Advertisement

A trend test for the analysis of multiple paternity

  • Markus NeuhäuserEmail author
  • Bernd Leisler
  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
Editor’s Invited Article

Abstract

The aquatic warbler, Acrocephalus paludicola, is one of a few species in which nestlings from a single nest can be sired by up to four different fathers. Data from a DNA fingerprinting study suggest that there is a trend: the larger the number of fathers in a brood the larger is the number of nestlings. However, the number of young within a single nest cannot be smaller than the number of fathers. This restriction causes an inherent trend and, consequently, can lead to a false-positive trend test result. For this nonstandard situation, we propose a trend test that differentiates between the inherent trend and a “real” trend, that is, a larger brood size through multiple paternity. Using DNA fingerprinting data, we performed a randomization test using the proposed new trend test statistic and obtained a significant result (P=0.047). This indicates that a larger number of fathers per brood is associated with a larger brood size. In addition, we consider an umbrella alternative, that is, a downturn in effect may occur after the optimal number of fathers per brood is exceeded. An appropriate test for this alternative also leads to a significance (P=0.011).

Key Words

DNA fingerprinting Jonckheere-Terpstra test Nonstandard situation Randomization test Umbrella alternative 

References

  1. Aquatic Warbler Conservation Team (1999), “World Population, Trends and Conservation Status of the Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola,” Vogelwelt, 120, 65–85.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, Y. I., and Wolfe, D. A. (1990), “A Study of Distribution-Free Tests for Umbrella Alternatives,” Biometrical Journal, 32, 47–57.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cytel Software Corporation (1998), StatXact 4 for Windows: User Manual, Cambridge, MA: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, A., Ross, D., O’Malley, S. L. C., and Burke, T. (1994), “Paternal Investment Inversely Related to Degree of Extra-Pair Paternity in the Reed Bunting,” Nature, 371, 698–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Good, P. I. (2000), Permutation Tests, (2nd ed.), New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Hollander, M., and Wolfe, D. A. (1999), Nonparametric Statistical Methods (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Manly, B. F. J. (1997), Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (2nd ed.), London: Chapman and Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Neuhäuser, M., Forstmeier, W., and Bretz, F. (2001), “The Distribution of Extra-Pair Young Within and Among Broods—A Technique to Calculate Deviations from Randomness,” Journal of Avian Biology, 32, 358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Neuhäuser, M., Liu, P.-Y., and Hothorn, L. A. (1998), “Nonparametric Tests for Trend: Jonckheere’s Test, A Modification and a Maximum Test,” Biometrical Journal, 40, 899–909.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Petrie, M., and Kempenaers, B. (1998), “Extra-Pair Paternity in Birds: Explaining Variation Between Species and Populations,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schulze-Hagen, K., Leisler, B., Schäfer, H. M., and Schmidt, V. (1999), “The Breeding System of the Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola—A Review of New Results,” Vogelwelt, 120, 87–96.Google Scholar
  12. Schulze-Hagen, K., Swatschek, I., Dyrez, A., and Wink, M. (1993), “Multiple Vaterschaften in Bruten des Seggenrohrsängers Acrocephalus paludicola Erste Ergebnissed es DNA-Fingerprintings,” Journal für Ornithologie, 134, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheldon, B. C. (1993), “Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Birds: Occurrence and Evolutionary Significance,” Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society London B, 339, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheldon, B. C., and Ellegren, H. (1999), “Sexual Selection Resulting from Extrapair Paternity in Collared Flycatchers,” Animal Behaviour, 57, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weller, E. A., and Ryan, L. M. (1998), “Testing for Trend With Count Data,” Biometrics, 54, 762–773.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Neuhäuser
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bernd Leisler
    • 2
  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Max Planck Research Center for OrnithologyVogelwarte RadolfzellRadolfzellGermany
  3. 3.Bioinformatic UnitUniversity of HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations