A bayesian approach to regional and local-area prediction from crop variety trials

  • Chris M. Theobald
  • Mike Talbot
  • Fabian Nabugoomu
Article

Abstract

The inclusion of covariates in models for analyzing variety × environmental data sets allows the estimation of variety yields for specific locations within a region as well as for the region as a whole. Here we explore a Bayesian approach to the estimation of such effects and to the choice of variety using a possibly incomplete variety × location × year data set that includes location × year covariates. This approach allows expert knowledge of the crop and uncertainty about local circumstances to be incorporated in the analysis. It is implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. An example is used to illustrate the approach and investigate its robustness.

Key Words

Bayesian inference Decision theory Local-area estimation Markov chain Monte Carlo Mixed-effects model Residual maximum likelihood Variety by environment data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, S. P. (1998), “Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method and Its Application,” The Statistician, 47, 69–100.Google Scholar
  2. Digby, P. G. N. (1979), “Modified Joint Regression Analysis for Incomplete Variety × Environment Data,” Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 93, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freeman, G. H., and Perkins, J. M. (1971), “Environmental and Genotype-Environmental Components of Variability. VIII. Relations Between Genotypes Grown in Different Environments and Measures of These Environments,” Heredity, 27, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelfand, A. E., Sahu, S. K., and Carlin, B. P. (1995), “Efficient Parametrisations for Normal Linear Mixed Models,” Biometrika, 82, 479–488.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilks, W., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, London: Chapman and Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardwick, R. C., and Wood, J. T. (1972), “Regression Methods for Studying Genotype-Environment Interactions,” Heredity, 28, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiniry, J. R., Ritchie, J. T., Musser, R. L., Flint, E. P., and Iwig, W. C. (1983), “The Photoperiod Sensitive Interval in Maize,” Agronomy Journal, 75, 687–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nabugoomu, F., Kempton, R. A., and Talbot, M. (1999), “Analysis of Series of Trials Where Varieties Differ in Sensitivity to Locations,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 4, 310–325.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Patterson, H. D. (1997), “Analysis of Series of Variety Trials,” in Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation, eds. R. A. Kempton and P. N. Fox, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 139–161.Google Scholar
  10. Piepho, H. P., Denis, J. B., and van Eeuwijk, F. A. (1998), “Predicting Cultivar Differences Using Covariates,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 151–162.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. G., and Gilks, W. (1996), BUGS: Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling (Ver. 0.5, ii), Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit.Google Scholar
  12. —, (1997), BUGS: Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling, Addendum to Manual (Ver. 0.6). Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit.Google Scholar
  13. Talbot, M. (1984), “Yield Variability of Crop Varieties in the U.K.,” Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 102, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Eeuwijk, F. A., Denis, J. B., and Kang, M. S. (1996), “Incorporating Additional Information on Genotypes and Environments in Models for Two-Way Genotype by Environment Tables,” in Genotype by Environment Interaction, eds. M. S. Kang and H. G. Gauch, Jr., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 15–50.Google Scholar
  15. Wood, J. T. (1976), “The Use of Environmental Variables in the Interpretation of Genotype-Environment Interaction,” Heredity, 37, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yates, F., and Cochran, W. G. (1938), “The Analysis of Groups of Experiments,” Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 28, 556–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Biometric Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris M. Theobald
    • 1
  • Mike Talbot
    • 2
  • Fabian Nabugoomu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghU.K.
  2. 2.Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandEdinburghU.K.
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations