Introduction

Carbon can occur throughout the near-surface regions of the Earth as well as deep within the Earth’s interior (Hazen et al. 2012). The mantle is thought to contain the Earth’s largest carbon reservoir, whereas the total estimated carbon concentration of the Earth’s core is still being debated (e.g., Chi et al. 2014; Dasgupta et al. 2013; Sleep and Zahnle 2001; McDonough 2003). The solubility of carbon in olivine and other major silicate-mantle minerals is extremely low (Shcheka et al. 2006), and this implies that the carbon must occur in the form of carbonates, graphite, diamond, or in C–H–O fluids, etc. Since these minerals have different oxidation states, their formation will depend on the pressure, temperature, and oxygen fugacity (fO2) in the mantle (e.g., Frost and Wood 1997; Kennedy and Kennedy 1976). According to these studies, carbon forms the minerals graphite or diamond under reducing conditions, which explains the prevalence of graphite/diamond in eclogites or peridotites from the lithosphere (e.g., Deines et al. 1991). The fO2 of the peridotitic mantle will remain in the graphite or diamond stability field to a depth of at least 100–150 km (Stagno and Frost 2010), implying that graphite or diamond would be the dominant host for carbon below 150-km depth, although Fe metal and carbides are also possible carbon hosts in the deep mantle.

Graphite attracts interest because it is thought to correspond with high levels of electrical conductivity in the mantle (e.g., Wang et al. 2013). In previous experimental studies concerning the influence of graphite on the electrical conductivity of a bulk aggregate, the graphite was prepared from graphite powders (Watson et al. 2010; Zhang and Yoshino 2017) and by coating a carbon film using a carbon coater (Yoshino and Noritake 2011). Wang et al. (2013) used diamond powder to form graphite, and this changed the morphology of graphite to thin disk-like shapes. According to Wang et al. (2013), a weight of more than 1% (~1.6 vol%) of graphite is needed to enhance electrical conductivity in the mantle. However, the estimated carbon concentration in the upper mantle is only 20–250 ppm (Hirschmann and Dasgupta 2009; Saal et al. 2002; Trull et al. 1993), and the critical carbon content proposed by Wang et al. (2013) is much higher than a realistic amount of graphite.

In this study, a new method for sintering pulverized natural crystals of olivine and clinopyroxene into graphite-bearing polycrystalline olivine and polycrystalline clinopyroxene is described. We successfully sintered samples and produced trace amounts of graphite (estimated to be a few hundred ppm), which presumably contains a realistic amount of graphite in the mantle. Although <1 wt% graphite may not play an important role in affecting the mantle’s electrical conductivity, carbon is considered to be a critical element in determining the rheological properties of the mantle, e.g., carbon affects the melting phase relationships of minerals in mantle rocks (Dasgupta and Hirschmann 2006). Our method might be useful for future measurements on the physical properties of graphite-bearing rocks such as grain-size-sensitive rheology or the seismic velocity of the Earth’s mantle.

Experimental methods

The materials used for the experiment were a crystal of San Carlos olivine with the composition Fo88–92Fa12–8: Mg1.76–1.84Fe0.16–0.24SiO4 from Arizona, USA, and a crystal of clinopyroxene from Badakhshan, Afghanistan, with the composition Di99Hed1: Ca0.92Na0.07Mn0.01Mg0.93Fe0.01Al0.06Si2O6. Each grain was crushed into millimeter-sized fragments using an iron mortar and then ground for >6 h using an automatic agate mortar. Finally, each sample was milled in high-purity ethanol or water with 0.5-mm zirconia beads using a nano-pulverizer (THINKY, Japan) to a particle size of <100 nm. Each mineral powder was dried at 90 °C for more than 12 h and then uniaxially pressed at ~150 MPa for 10 min into a small disk with a 6 mm diameter and 0.7–1.9 mm thickness. Sintering was conducted using a Siliconit tube furnace under the flow of 99.995% pure argon (N2 < 40.0 ppm, O2 < 10.0 ppm). Samples were placed on a nickel plate and sintered at various temperatures ranging from 1130 to 1350 °C for 2 h. The heating and cooling rates were maintained at 5 °C/min. After sintering, the samples were cut and mirror-polished using a diamond sheet and then thermally etched for 0.5 h at 50–150 °C lower than the sintering temperatures in argon. The reason for the etching was to expose grain boundaries.

The observation of microstructures was performed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; JEOL, JSM-7001F) with an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. The grain size was calculated from SEM images using ImageJ software. The samples appeared to be too small to achieve precise measurements via the Archimedes method; thus, porosity was estimated using a portion of the total pore volume on the SEM images. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed to identify the phases present using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku RINT-2500) with CuK α radiation. Raman spectra of olivine, clinopyroxene, and graphite were obtained via laser Raman microspectroscopy (Renishaw Raman imaging microscope). The Raman spectra of clinopyroxene exhibited a strong fluorescent background, and these were processed by background subtraction and subsequent smoothing with Wire v4.0 Raman software.

Results and discussion

Several typical examples of the microstructures of sintered olivine and sintered clinopyroxene from powders milled with ethanol are shown in Fig. 1. Grains of both samples have a homogeneous texture and a polygonal shape. The average axis ratios for olivine and clinopyroxene grains were in the range of 1.5–1.6 and 1.5–1.7, respectively. After sintering of 2 h, with increasing sintering temperature, the average grain size of sintered olivine increased from 0.2 to 1.4 µm (at 1130–1350 °C), and the grain size of sintered clinopyroxene increased from 0.1 to 2.4 µm (at 1130–1280 °C). Porosities varied from 2 to 5 vol% for olivine and from 3 to 4 vol% for clinopyroxene. The crystal size distribution (CSD) in each sample is plotted as the frequency of the normalized grain size (G/G m, G m is average grain size) in Fig. 2. Olivine has a broad CSD with peaks in the range of G/G m = 0.6–1.2, while clinopyroxene has a CSD demonstrating a unimodal peak at G/G m = 0.6–0.8. The grain-growth exponent n was not obtained in the different temperature experiments conducted over 2 h; therefore, the grain-growth mechanisms for olivine and clinopyroxene could not be estimated. The characteristics of CSD in the clinopyroxene aggregates suggest that the dominant grain-growth process might be controlled by coalescence (Takajo et al. 1984) or by the Ostwald ripening (Sugimoto 1978). Alternatively, olivine aggregates might not reach a steady-state grain-growth condition based on the differences in the peak locations and the broadness of the grain size distribution.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the sintered samples of a, c olivine and b, d clinopyroxene from powders milled with ethanol. In both samples, polished and thermal-etched cut sections are shown. Each sample was sintered for 2 h at different temperatures of a 1200 °C, b 1130 °C, c 1300 °C, and d 1280 °C. The small bright particles in the SEM images of sintered olivine were identified as magnetite from the thermal-etching processes via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Raman analysis

Fig. 2
figure 2

Crystal size distribution (CSD) of a olivine and b clinopyroxene obtained from the samples sintered for 2 h at different temperatures

Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the mineral powders and sintered samples of olivine and clinopyroxene from powders milled with ethanol. Most of the pattern peaks represent Bragg’s reflections for olivine and clinopyroxene in the aggregates. Figure 4 shows the Raman spectra for the mineral powders, the sintered samples of olivine and clinopyroxene milled with water, and the sintered samples of olivine and clinopyroxene milled with ethanol. In the spectra of sintered samples from powders milled with ethanol, original olivine or clinopyroxene peaks were detected along with two broad peaks at 1350 and 1580 cm−1, corresponding to sp2-bonded graphitic carbon. These graphite peaks were not observed in the surface samples but in a cut section of the samples, implying that surface carbon was at least oxidized under fO2 conditions in our experiments. It is also obvious from the Raman spectra that the intensity of graphite peaks decreases with increasing sintering temperature (Fig. 5). This feature is found in the spectra of both sintered olivine and sintered clinopyroxene. The XRD patterns of both sintered samples suggest that the content of graphite in the sintered samples is very low and below the XRD detection limit. Although electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) of carbon concentrations is quite difficult due to the contamination of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) on the sample surface, we compared the difference in EPMA values for carbon between the graphite-bearing sample and the “graphite-free” sample revealed by Raman analysis. The graphite content was not precisely analyzed, but the estimated carbon concentration is a few hundred ppm. As both starting materials did not contain any carbon-bearing minerals, there is a possibility that the ethanol solvent or carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could be responsible for the presence of graphite in the sintered samples. The powders that were milled with water rather than ethanol and then sintered did not exhibit a graphite Raman peak, and therefore, this might be significant in determining the presence of graphite.

Fig. 3
figure 3

X-ray diffraction patterns from the mineral powders and sintered samples of a olivine and b clinopyroxene from powders milled with ethanol. Olivine and clinopyroxene samples were sintered at 1300 and 1280 °C, respectively. The XRD patterns of both sintered samples did not exhibit graphite peaks (e.g., at a 2θ value of 26°)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Raman spectra of mineral powders and samples that were sintered at 1300 °C for a olivine and 1180 °C for b clinopyroxene. (i) Mineral powders. (ii) Sintered from powders milled with water. (iii) Sintered from powders milled with ethanol. Graphite peaks were not found in sintered samples where the powders were milled using water rather than ethanol

Fig. 5
figure 5

Raman spectra of sintered a olivine and b clinopyroxene. Samples were sintered for 2 h at different temperatures: 1130–1350 °C for olivine and 1130–1280 °C for clinopyroxene

As mentioned above, fO2 is an important parameter governing the carbon–mineral type. If the presence of remaining graphite within the inner part of the sample is considered, fO2 is estimated to be at most 10−4 Pa at the peak temperature (~1350 °C) of our experiments according to the Ellingham diagram for the formation of oxides as a function of temperature. This is quite significantly lower than the theoretical fO2 value of about 10−1 to 10−2 Pa calculated using the composition of argon gas. The nickel plate under the sample was partly oxidized after sintering, and therefore, nickel–oxygen reactions should have controlled fO2 in the furnace. Although the oxygen fugacity buffered by Ni–NiO (fO2 of 101 to 102 Pa at 1350 °C) is also above the fO2 stability of graphite, the nickel plate might have caused reduced fO2 close to the sample. The absence of graphite at the surface of the sample implies that the outer surface of sample was exposed to a more oxidizing environment. The reason for these ranges in fO2 is not well understood, but it could be related to the decreasing rate of the temperature. The fO2 stability of graphite decreases with increasing temperature, which may explain the gradual decrease in graphite in Raman bands with increasing sintering temperature. The results show that to obtain samples that have a constant quantity of graphite, sintering experiments should be performed at a much lower fO2 (<10−4 Pa) with a gas other than argon (e.g., CO/CO2 gas mixes) or under high-vacuum conditions (about <10−3 Pa).

The Raman spectrum of a highly crystalline graphite particle generally has only one peak at 1580 cm−1, known as the G band. However, in our sintered samples an additional D band occurs at 1350 cm−1, implying some structural disorder ascribed to impurities, edges, and other defects (Tuinstra and Koenig 1970; Pimenta et al. 2007). The ratio of the D and G band intensities (I D /I G ) can be used as a parameter for quantifying the disorder, and these values inversely vary with the crystallite size L a (in the direction of the graphite plane). The sintered samples exhibit a broad Raman spectral feature of D and G bands and a high I D /I G , implying a large amount of disorder or a very small crystallite size. Graphite particles were not identified in the sintered samples, when these samples were investigated via SEM and TEM, and therefore, graphite is expected to occur as less than few nanometer-sized particles. The crystallite size (L a ) of graphite in sintered olivine was estimated to be <15 nm. This is calculated by using the following empirical formula proposed by Cançado et al. (2006):

$$L_{a} \,\left( {\text{nm}} \right) = (2.4 \times 10^{ - 10} ) \, \lambda_{l}^{4} \left( {I_{D} /I_{G} } \right)^{ - 1}$$
(1)

where λ l is the laser line wavelength in nanometers. According to Graf et al. (2007), the relative intensity of the G and D′ bands (D′ band: the second-order band at around 2700 cm−1) is an indicator of the number of stacked layers in the graphite. Although the intensity of the D′ band was not precisely obtained due to the overlapping high-fluorescence background even in the case of olivine spectra, few-layers to multilayers of graphite are expected in sintered olivine.

Recently, nanocrystalline materials have received wide attention because they potentially influence creep behavior and earthquake rupture nucleation and propagation (Chen et al. 2013). For example, Koizumi et al. (2010) successfully obtained a highly dense and fine-grained aggregate of mantle composites that included olivine (porosity 0.65 vol%, 720 nm) and clinopyroxene (porosity 0.13 vol%, 1.1 µm). In their study, the olivine powder was vacuum sintered at 1240 °C (Fo90Fa10: Mg1.8Fe0.2SiO4) and the diopside powder (an end-member of Ca-pyroxene: CaMgSi2O6) was sintered at 1260 °C. We compared the sintered samples from this study with those of Koizumi et al. (2010) at temperatures closer to those in their experiments and obtained olivine aggregates of a similar grain size (690 nm) with 1200 °C sintering. However, the grain size of sintered clinopyroxene (2.4 µm) at 1280 °C in the present study was about twice as large as that in the study by Koizumi et al. (2010). This difference in grain size might be related to the content of impurities in our sample (e.g., Na2O, Al2O3, FeO, and MnO). It was not possible to obtain the highly dense samples that Koizumi et al. (2010) obtained, but we successfully obtained graphite-bearing polycrystalline olivine and polycrystalline clinopyroxene with a submicron to micron grain size. These graphite-bearing fine-grained aggregates may be useful for future measurements to understand the influence of graphite on grain-size-sensitive deformation behavior of the Earth’s mantle.

Conclusions

Polycrystalline olivine and polycrystalline clinopyroxene containing trace amounts of graphite were successfully sintered from natural crystals of olivine and clinopyroxene. Graphite was identified in the sintered samples using Raman spectroscopy but was only evident in samples that were sintered from powders milled with ethanol. The intensity of the graphite Raman peak decreased as the sintering temperature increased from 1130 to 1350 °C. The in-plane crystallite size of graphite in the sintered olivine was estimated to be <15 nm, and the number of stacked layers in the graphite was considered to range from few-layers to multilayers.