The results of fire suppression using fluorinated chemical gases
In the current work, five typical fluorinated chemical gases are employed to inhibit a fixed fire. Chemical gases are comprised of H-2402, H-1323, H-1301, H-37, and FK-5–1-12. It was observed that the fire suppression time of the above chemical gases is 9 s, 9 s, 9 s, 12 s, and 9 s, respectively. The description of fire suppression performed by FK-5-1-12 is shown in Fig. 2. After keeping a pool fire for 10 s (shown in Fig. 2a), FK-5-1-12 is injected from the sprayer. The flame was observed to be enlarged at the early stage (Fig. 2b). This is inferred to be consistent with a combustion promotion phenomenon reported previously [32]. The process of the action of fire extinguishing agent and flame can be divided into two parts: First, the fire extinguishing agent is decomposed into small molecules containing fluorine by heat, and then these inhibitory groups react with active free radicals. Taking H-37 as an example, first half or less of H-37 is decomposed by HF elimination reaction, and the remaining H-37 is decomposed by free radical induced reaction or homolytic reaction. Although fluorinated olefins account for a relatively small amount of fluorine-containing radical pools generated by decomposition, they are very important intermediates in the decomposition process of H-37. Due to the existence of double bonds in fluorinated olefins, the energy barriers for addition reactions with •H, •O, •OH, and O2 are very low, and fluorinated olefins can be decomposed very quickly through radical addition reactions. Obviously, the fluorine-containing radical pool generated by the thermal decomposition of hydrofluoroolefins accounts for a high proportion of small fluorine-containing olefin molecules. Therefore, in a flame where •H, •O, and •OH radicals exist in large quantities, the radical addition reaction will be greatly affected. Accelerate the decomposition of hydrofluoroolefins. Since most of the reactions between fluorine-containing small molecules and active free radicals are exothermic reactions, the overall heat release rate is accelerated. When the concentration of the extinguishing agent is insufficient, the amount of active free radicals captured by the inhibitor group has little effect on the combustion system, but it accelerates the release of heat, which leads to the strengthening of the overall combustion reaction. This is the combustion-promoting effect of hydrofluoroolefins main reason. Then the FK-5-1-12 diffused in the chamber surrounding the fixed flame, as shown in Fig. 2c. Finally, it is suppressed after flame fluctuation due to the inhibition of radical chain reaction. It is reported previously that most halogenated extinguishing agents added at sub-suppressing concentration result in a combustion enhancement and lead to an increase in both flame size and fluctuation. It is mainly because of the highly exothermic reactions between fluorine-containing groups and •H, •OH radicals [33]. High fire-extinguishing efficiency is able to provide good fire protection of historical items from fire. Therefore, the fire-extinguishing time is one of the critical indexes when the fluorinated chemical gas is used in the fire protection of the historic building.
In addition, a variety of gaseous products are yielded. It includes HF, CO, CO2, H2O, and so on. The description of main gas products varying test times is illustrated in Fig. 3. The composition of gas products is observed to vary greatly from fluorinated chemical gases. One of the corrosive gas products is HF. The peak of CO in gas products of fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5-1-12, H-1323 and H-1301 is 3034.08 mg/m3, 442.49 mg/m3, 3439.43 mg/m3, 4312.6 mg/m3 and 6199.47 mg/m3, respectively. The peak of CO2 yield in gas products of fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5-1-12, H-1323, and H-1301 is 1.2 vol %, 0.8 vol %, 1.1 vol %, 0.4 vol %, and 0.5 vol %, respectively. The total amount of CO2 during 50 min fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5–1-12, H-1323 and H-1301 is 27.5 vol %, 12.6 vol %, 21.9 vol %, 4.0 vol % and 9.4 vol %, respectively. The low yield of CO2 is obtained when H-1323 is used.
It is a fact that when HF gas is mixed with gaseous H2O, its corrosiveness is highly improved [34, 35]. Reduction of gaseous H2O is a potential method to lower the hazard impacted to the surrounding environment during fire suppression. Therefore, the H2O concentration is also under discussion of current work. The peak of H2O yield in gas products of fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5-1-12, H-1323 and H-1301 is 0.22 vol %, 0.60 vol %, 0.35 vol %, 0.44 vol % and 0.49 vol %, respectively. The total amount of H2O during 50 min fire suppression tests using H-37, H-2402, FK-5-1-12, H-1323, and H-1301 is 10.2 vol %, 9.4 vol %, 11.2 vol %, 8.5 vol %, and 13.8 vol %, respectively. The amount of H2O varies from 8.5 vol % to 11.2 vol %.
a CO and HF b CO2 and H2O.
It is reported that after pretreatment by HF, some morphological changes of wood were observed, indicating partial damage in biomasses structure although, their main framework was unchanged [36]. In addition, HF contribute to Si diminution [36, 37]. The reduction of HF is a continuous goal for various researches which lasts for many years. The HF history is summarized in Fig. 4a. The peak of HF yield in gas products of fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5–1-12, H-1323, and H-1301 are 1718.9 mg/m3, 208.4 mg/m3, 1233.8 mg/m3, 876.8 mg/m3, and 366.5 mg/m3, respectively. The total amount of HF during 50 min fire suppression test using H-37, H-2402, FK-5–1-12, H-1323 and H-1301 are 32,260.4 mg/m3, 2966.0 mg/m3, 29,512.9 mg/m3, 14,327.9 mg/m3 and 7696.8 mg/m3, respectively. It is clarified that the yield of HF is low when H-1301 and H-2402 are used. The final product of fluorinated chemical gases decomposed at high temperature contains HF. The concentration of HF generated is proportional to the weight of F in the molecular of the gases. Therefore, HF-37 and FK-5–1-12 have the most HF production. To avoid a high yield of HF, the H-37 is not recommended. It is believed that the experimental trend of HF amount differing from kinds of fire agents is consistent with theoretical value (Fig. 4b).
The colorimetric change analysis of samples after fire suppression
After the samples exposed to a fire suppression environment, the surface of the wooden samples had a dark color. The outlooks of the sample before and after fire suppression are illustrated in Fig. 5. The comparison of the colorimetric change in color coordinates (L*, a*, b*) is also shown in it. Regarding the Dao Talisman board, the averaged L*, a*, and b* are reduced by 12.6%, 19.4%, 21.8% after fire suppression using five fluorinated chemical gases, respectively. The fire suppression shows a significant impact on the value of b* (just as shown in Fig. 5a). It indicates that the surface becomes darkish, greenish, and bluish. Concerning painting papers, the averaged L*and b* are reduced by 14.3% and 17.0%, the averaged a* is increased by 4.4%. The fire suppression impacts a little on the value of a* and makes the surface turn darkish, reddish, and bluish (just as shown in Fig. 5b). For the traditional wooden chips (woodgrain is vertical), the averaged L*and b* are reduced by 17.6% and 9.6%, the averaged a* is increased by 0.5%. However, the averaged L*, a*, and b* of weathered wooden chips are reduced by 13.5%, 5.7%, 11.4% after fire suppression using five fluorinated chemical gases, respectively. The surface of wooden chips is darkish and bluish. The difference found in the value of a* is due to the color change of green. After weathering, the sample exposed to a fire suppression seems much easier to be greenish. The final product of fluorinated chemical gases decomposed at high temperature contains HF. The concentration of HF generated is proportional to the content of F atoms in the gas. The difference in HF concentration results in different colors of samples in different tests. High temperatures during thermal modification cause the degradation of hemicelluloses and lignin, resulting in the production of water, carbon dioxide, formic acid, acetic acid, and other substances that can be involved in condensation reactions, and chromophore groups are formed [38]. Different test samples have different types of wood, and their internal wood fiber structure is also different. Therefore, their color changes under high temperature treatment are also different.
Influence of HF amount on the change of surface color
It is reported that HF plays an essential role in the color change of materials due to its corrosion [39]. Here, the color change of wooden chips differing the peak of HF history and total HF during fire suppression are detailed, respectively. Both traditional and weathered wooden samples, including three kinds of woodgrain styles, are tested. The description of samples is listed in Fig. 6a. The section of the wooden column is woodgrain 1 and the beam is woodgrain 2, which is used widely in Chinese historic buildings. To discuss the influence of HF on the color change of weathered wooden chips could provide a deep understanding of fire suppression impacting the historic buildings. It is observed in Fig. 6b that the color change of wooden chips differing woodgrain styles. In general, the fire suppression impacting on the color change of wooden chips is ranked as woodgrain 2 > woodgrain 1 > woodgrain 3. However, a slight difference shows in each coordinate of the color value of L*, a*, and b* concerning both traditional and weathered wooden chips. After fire suppression using fluorinated chemical gases, the total color difference (ΔE*) of traditional chips is found to be sensitive to the peak of HF history and total HF. The HF amount shows a predominant influence on the color difference varying woodgrain styles. The total color difference of traditional samples after fire suppression is ranked as woodgrain 1 > woodgrain 2 > woodgrain 3.
When the weathered wooden chips are exposed to the fire suppression environment, the total color difference of samples before and after the fire suppression is smaller than the traditional samples (see Fig. 6c). In addition, both high yields of H2O and HF would result in a significant color difference, which is consistent with the results of H-37 and FK-5-1-12. Although the gaseous HF is highly yielded when the two above chemical gases are employed, the low concentration of H2O results in a slight color change. The reduction of H2O during fire suppression could be a good method to decrease the effects of acid gas on the color change of historic wooden buildings.
Influence of weathering process on color change of wooden chips
The observation of Fig. 6a shows that the color of weathered samples is much easier changed due to fire suppression. Regarding the traditional wooden chips, the averaged coordinate parameters L*, a*, and b* of samples with woodgrain 2are reduced by 12.6%, 2.1%, 0.1% after fire suppression using five fluorinated chemical gases, respectively. It is described in Fig. 7a. The averaged L*, a*, and b* of samples with woodgrain 1 are reduced by 17.6%, 0. 5%, 9.6%, respectively. The averaged L*, a*, and b* of samples with woodgrain 3 are reduced by 6.6%, 2.8%, 8.0%, respectively. The color change of traditional wooden chips with woodgrain 1, woodgrain 2, and woodgrain 3 are 12.8, 9.7, and 5.5, respectively.
Concerning the weathered samples, the averaged coordinate parameters L* and b* of samples with woodgrain 2 are reduced by 11.9% and 10.8%, a* of the sample with woodgrain 1 is increased by 11.1%. Figure 7b shows that the averaged L*, a*, and b* of samples with woodgrain 1 are reduced by 13.5%, 5.7%, 11.4%, respectively. The averaged L*, a*, and b* of samples with woodgrain 3 are reduced by 11.4%, 9.9%, 6.9%, respectively (see Fig. 7c). The color change of traditional wooden chips with woodgrain 1, woodgrain 2, and woodgrain 3 are 8.9, 9.0, and 7.8, respectively. The color change difference varying the total HF, H2O and total HF × H2O are illustrated in Fig. 7d, Fig. 7e, and Fig. 7f, respectively. The color change of samples is found to be consistent with the amount of total HF and HF × H2O. It is concluded that gaseous HF is playing a predominant role in the color change of wooden surfaces.
Comparing of the traditional and weathered samples with the same woodgrain style indicates that the value of L* of the traditional chip is much easier to reduce. The apparent difference is also found in the change of b*. The reduction of b* value of weathered samples is much larger than that of the traditional ones. It means the weathered chip suggests a color shift toward blue because of fire suppression. This phenomenon may be related to the different moisture content in the wood.
The surface investigation of weathered wooden chips
It is known to all that, high concentration of HF yield during fire suppression would show a danger to the surface of surrounding materials. Here, the weathered timbers are employed to be acting as the traditional Chinese historic building. Then the gaseous HF effects on the weathered samples could be clarified. During our test, the weathered timber chips are placed in the chamber during fire suppression, then the characteristic of the wooden surface is identified with the help of SEM at 50 μm. The preliminary results are shown in Fig. 8. It is observed that the surface of the wood is full of porous cells, especially after weathering by natural condition, the surface area would be highly enlarged. Much more gases would be absorbed by weathered surfaces. It is believable when the weathered wood surfaces (acting as a Chinese historic building) are exposed to a variety of corrosive gases, the deposition of HF and H2O would impact a significant hazard. The surfaces of materials would be corroded a little when they were treated with high concentration acid. In addition, the deposited F is hard to be removed since the wood or paper historic artwork is brittle during the repair process after fire suppression.
When the weathered timber chips were exposed to fire suppression, the element concentration distribution of the wooden surface is evaluated by EDX analysis of SEM. The results are summarized in Fig. 9. Figure 9a indicates the ratio of the main elements after fire suppression using HF-37 gases. It is observed the deposited F on wooden surface using H-37, H-2402, FK-5-1-12, H-1323 and H-1301 are found to be 1.6%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively. It is consistent with the total amount of HF generated during fire suppression, as illustrated in Fig. 9b. The amount of F-deposited on the wooden surface is positively correlated with a total amount of gaseous HF. The biggest amount of gaseous HF is generated by HF-37. An interesting relationship between the concentration of deposited F on the surface and total color change is found in Fig. 9c. It interfers that the color change mechanism of wooden surface is comprehensive, although the amount of HF is a leading factor. However, the long-time effects of deposited F on the surface change of historic buildings still need to be made for further analysis.