Milk samples
A total of 187 commercial cows' milk samples, consisting of 33 sterilized and 154 pasteurized products, from 24 Iranian dairy brands were randomly collected from the Shahre-kourd city market from January to July 2012. Sample size was determined based on the previously reported values of antibiotic contaminated milk samples in Iran (5–20 %) [12–15]. Also availability of the commercial brands in the market was considered in sampling. Samples were sent to the Food and Drink Quality Control laboratory of the Shahre-kourd University of Medical Science, and were examined for the presence of antimicrobials.
Screening test
Screening tests were conducted using a commercial kit (Eclipse 100-kit (Zeu. Inmunotec, Spain)) by which the presence of antimicrobial residues could be detected based on the inhibition of microbial activity. According to the manufacturing company, the sensitivity of the test for TETs is between 50–150 μg/kg. Positively detected milk samples were stored at −20°c until HPLC analysis.
Chemical and reagents
Analytical standards of tetracycline antibiotics, including tetracycline hydrochloride, oxytetracyclin hydrochloride, chlortetracyclin hydrochloride and doxycyclin hydrochloride, were provided from Alderck Company. Analytical grade chemicals including acetic acid, sodium chloride, oxalic acid, citric acid, ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) were provided from Merck, Germany. Methanol and Acetonitril of HPLC grade were also from Merck-Germany. Solid phase extraction cartridges (500 mg, 6 ml) were provided from Macherey-Nagel Company (Germany).
Preparation of standard curves
Stock solutions of tetracyclines in methanol (Merck-Germany) at the concentration of 100 μg/ml were prepared using pharmaceutical standards; working standards in methanol were made in the concentration rage of 50–400 ng/ml. The working standards were kept in refrigerator for less than one month [19].
Preparation milk samples
Two milliliters of 20 % TCA (trichloroacetic acid-Merck-Germany) and 20 ml of EDTA-McIlvaine buffer were added to 5 ml of milk sample. EDTA-McIlvaine was prepared using 11.8 g of citric acid monohydrate, 13.72 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate dehydrate, and 33.62 g of ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dissolved in 1 l of double-distilled water (0.01 M). The mixture was then mixed thoroughly and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min. The resultant supernatant was removed and then applied to the solid phase extraction (SPE HLB C18) cartridge that had been previously activated with 3 ml methanol followed by rinsing with 2 ml double-distilled water. After loading each sample, the cartridge was washed with 2 ml methanol solution (5 %) in double-distilled water, the analytics was eluted with 3 ml of pure methanol, instantly removed under a nitrogen stream, and the residue was resolved in 1 ml mobile phase. In each batch of injection, 10 μl of the given aliquot or standard was filtered through a 0.45-μm micro-filter and injected in to system [20].
Instruments and HPLC condition
The UHPLC-KUNAER system was used (model A69420, Germany) which was equipped with double pumps (model A60015, Germany), UV-vis detector (model MW-1 A61031, Germany) set at 355 nm and auto sampler (model AS-1 A63500, Germany). Separation was carried out under isocratic conditions using a C18 Column, 250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D., containing 5 μm particles. The mobile phase consisted of 0.01 M oxalic acid solution, methanol and acetonitril (60:25:15 v/v/v), and was filtered through a 0.45-μm micro-filter at an adjusted flow rate of 1 ml/min.
Validity parameters
Obtained validity parameters, including linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of qualification (LOQ), entry-day precision, and intra-day precision, are listed in Table 1. Calibration curves of mixed standard TETs were provided for five concentration levels (50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 ng/ml) in a blank milk sample.
Table 1 Validity parameters in analytical determination of tetracycline residues in milk
The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined based on signal to noise ratios. For the entry-day precision, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of four repeated measurements of a blank milk sample containing 500 ng/ml mix standard through a one-day experiment run was considered. For the determination of intra-day precision, the relative standard deviation of the repeated measurements of a milk sample containing 100 ng/ml standard mix in blank milk sample through four subsequent days was taken in to account. A recovery test was performed using the spiked blank milk in three concentration levels (100, 200, 300 ng/ml) of mix standard. The obtained recovery percentages are presented in Table 2. The highest and lowest recovery rates were obtained for tetracycline (88.78 %) and chlortetracyclin (64.68 %) respectively. Based on the European Commission, Regulation 2002/657/EC, the RSD should be lower than 15 % [21].
Table 2 Recovery (%) of tetracyclines spiked in different concentration levels
Exposure assessment of TETs residues in milk
Exposure assessment was performed using deterministic (point estimate) and probabilistic distribution-based or population-related) approaches for three target groups; infants, children and adults were included.
Per capita milk consumption was obtained from the official report released by the deputy head of Iran Dairy Industries Society (IDIS) [22] as 85–90 kg and used in the deterministic exposure assessment. The reported results of three recent Iranian nutrition surveys were used to derive the lowest, the highest and average milk intake among adults and children [23–25] in the probabilistic exposure estimation. The following equations were used to determine the risk associated with the TETs residue through milk intake:
$$ \mathrm{Intake}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{TETs}\ \mathrm{residue}\left(\upmu \mathrm{g}/\mathrm{day}\right) = \mathrm{Mean}\ \mathrm{residue}\ \mathrm{concentration}\left(\upmu \mathrm{g}/\mathrm{kg}\right) \times \mathrm{daily}\ \mathrm{milk}\ \mathrm{consumption}\left(\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{day}\right) $$
(1)
$$ \%\mathrm{A}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{I} = 100 \times \mathrm{I}\mathrm{ntake}\ \left(\upmu \mathrm{g}/\mathrm{day}\right)\ /\left[\left(\mathrm{A}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{I}\ \left(\upmu \mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{kg}}_{\mathrm{bw}}/\mathrm{day}\right) \times \mathrm{body}\ \mathrm{weight}\ \left(\mathrm{kg}\right)\right]\right. $$
(2)
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software Version-19 was used for data analysis using descriptive statistics.