Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS overweight/obese patients after controlled ovarian stimulation with the GnRH antagonist protocol and frozen embryo transfer

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 16, Article number: 36 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Overweight/obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk of subfertility and complications of pregnancy, compared with normal-weight women. To implement controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), the improved efficacy of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol has been demonstrated, as well as frozen embryo transfer (FET).

Objective

This retrospective study evaluated the pregnancy outcomes after combined GnRH-ant protocol and FET in overweight/obese women with PCOS, with reference to that of normal-weight women with PCOS.

Methods

Women with PCOS (n = 398) who underwent the GnRH-ant protocol for COH followed by FET, were stratified as normal-weight (BMI < 24 kg/m2) or overweight/obese (BMI ≥24 kg/m2). The outcomes of pregnancy were compared.

Results

The overweight/obese patients had significantly lower rates of embryo implantation (47.7%), live birth (47.8%), and live births of twins (10.9%) compared with the normal-weight group (58.4%, 60.8%, and 30.0%, respectively; P = 0.006, 0.015, and 0.000), while the rate of late abortion was significantly higher (11.0% cf. 3.8%, P = 0.030). BMI was the only significant factor affecting the probability of live birth.

Conclusion

The pregnancy outcomes of overweight/obese women with PCOS after COH via the GnRH-ant protocol and FET remained at a significant deficit compared with that of normal-weight women with PCOS.

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age [1]. PCOS is often concomitant with obesity, oligo- or amenorrhea, hormonal abnormality, and infertility [2, 3]. Obesity is also associated with complications of reproduction, including maternal mortality; stillbirth; neonatal and infant death; infant large-for-gestational age; fetal malformations; maternal diabetes; pregnancy-induced hypertension; pre-eclampsia; and Caesarean section [4,5,6]. Thus, obese women with PCOS are at increased risk of infertility and complications of pregnancy.

Patients with PCOS and infertility may resort, as final treatments, to assisted reproductive techniques, including controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and embryo transfer. COH implemented by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol requires less time and is more cost-effective than the standard GnRH agonist long protocol, and is also associated with a significantly lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [7, 8]. Thus, the GnRH-ant protocol is recommended for infertile women with PCOS. Furthermore, while fresh embryo transfer is standard for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), it has been demonstrated that pregnancies and live births that arise from frozen-thawed embryos have better obstetric and perinatal outcomes [9]. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial confirmed that women with PCOS who underwent fresh embryo transfer experienced a significantly lower rate of live births than did those who were given frozen embryo transfer (FET) [10]. Thus, it may be expected that assisted reproduction that includes a combination of COH via the GnRH-ant protocol and FET may help to ease the risk of reproduction complications in women with PCOS, including those who are overweight/obese.

The present retrospective analysis evaluated the pregnancy outcomes of overweight/obese women with PCOS after treatment by the GnRH-ant protocol for COH and FET, by comparison to the outcomes of normal-weight women with PCOS.

Methods

Study population

This retrospective analysis reviewed the results of IVF/ICSI-FET performed from January 2014 through December 2016 at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, China. The Ethics Committee of the hospital approved the study. Because this was a retrospective investigation, patients were not asked to participate in the analysis.

The inclusion criteria were: patients with PCOS who underwent their first IVF/ICSI cycles and then primary FET cycles; maternal age < 35 years; and use of the GnRH-ant protocol for COH. A total of 398 cycles (patients) were analyzed. For analysis, the pregnancy outcomes of patients with normal weight (N-W; n = 260) were compared with that of overweight/obese patients (O-O; n = 138), where the threshold was a body mass index (BMI) of 24 kg/m2 [11, 12].

The definition of PCOS was in accordance with the Rotterdam criteria [13], therefore fulfilling ≥2 of the following: oligo- or anovulation; clinical or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism; and polycystic ovaries and exclusion of other etiologies (i.e., congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting tumors, or Cushing’s syndrome).

Study procedures

All 398 patients received the GnRH antagonist protocol for COH, oocyte retrieval, and fertilization, followed by cryopreservation, freeze-thaw, and transfer of embryos.

Ovarian stimulation with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotrophin was initiated on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle. Doses were adjusted according to the ovarian response, as monitored via ultrasonography and measurement of serum sex steroids. For the fixed protocol, GnRH-ant (Cetrorelix, Mercerono) at a daily dose of 0.25 mg was initiated in the morning of day 5 or 6 of stimulation, and continued up to the day before triggering ovulation, to inhibit a premature surge in luteinizing hormone surge. For the flexible protocol, GnRH-ant at a daily dose of 0.25 mg was initiated, when the largest follicle exceeded 12-14 mm. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at a dose of 4000-10,000 IU was administered to induce oocyte maturation, when ≥2 follicles measured ≥18 mm. Oocyte retrieval was performed 34-36 h later.

Oocytes were inseminated approximately 4-6 h after follicular aspiration by IVF or ICSI, depending on sperm quality. Morphologic criteria were used for embryo scoring. After 3 to 6 days of culture, high-quality embryos were frozen by vitrification.

Endometrial preparation for every FET cycle was performed according to the natural cycle, artificial cycle, or induced ovulation cycle. For natural cycles, follicular growth was monitored by serum hormones and ultrasound beginning on cycle day 10. Endometrial thickness > 7 mm was chosen for embryo transfer. For patients with irregular menstrual cycles after ovarian stimulation, an artificial cycle or induced ovulation cycle was used. In the artificial cycle, oral estradiol valerate (Progynova, Delpharm Lille) was applied for endometrial preparation on day 2 or 3 of the second menstrual cycle, after oocyte retrieval. Intramuscular progesterone at a dose of 40 mg/d was applied when the endometrial thickness reached 7 mm. In the induced ovulation cycle, 75 IU/d of human menopausal gonadotrophin was utilized until the largest follicle exceeded 18 mm, 10,000 IU of hCG was injected at midnight to trigger ovulation.

In all FET cycles, one or 2 day 3–6 cryopreserved embryos were thawed and transferred. Luteal-phase support with estradiol valerate and intramuscular progesterone for endometrium preparation continued until 10 weeks after conception.

We identified the implanted embryos and defined clinical pregnancy via ultrasonography at 35 days after FET. All pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were assessed by a call back nurse, including live birth, birth weight, preterm birth, and pregnancy loss: ectopic pregnancy, early abortion (<12 weeks), and late abortion (bewteen 12 and 28 weeks).

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics Package (IBM SPSS Statistics 21; IBM, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and comparisons were performed using a 2-sample unpaired t-test (normal data distribution) or the Kruskal-Wallis H test (skewed data). Percentages were subjected to the paired chi-squared test. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors influencing live birth. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 398 cycles were included in this study. There were 260 and 138 couples in the N-W and O-O groups, respectively. For the wives, the two groups were similar with regard to mean age, and serum estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone (Table 1). The BMI of the O-O group was significantly higher than that of the N-W (P = 0.000). Compared with the N-W patients, the O-O cohort had significantly lower serum LH, prolactin, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and took significantly longer to conceive. For the husbands, the two groups were similar at sperm density, sperm motility and abnormal sprem rate.

Table 1 Characteristics of the patients at baseline
Full size table

Ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, and frozen embryo transfer

Compared with the N-W patients, the O-O group required significantly more days of ovarian stimulation, a higher total dose of gonadotrophin (Gn), and higher Gn/kg (Table 2). However, the applied doses of GnRH-ant did not differ significantly between the two patient groups.

Table 2 Outcomes of COH
Full size table

On the day of hCG trigger, the O-O and N-W groups were similar with regard to the number of follicles > 18 mm, serum luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and endometrial thickness; and also had similar numbers of oocytes retrieved and good-quality embryos on day 3. While the serum estradiol in O-O groups was significant lower than N-W group. The percentages of patients with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or underwent ICSI were similar between the 2 groups. At the time of FET, the serum luteinizing hormone, prolactin, endometrial thickness and quantity and grade of transferred frozen-thawed embryos of the 2 groups were similar. While the serum estradiol in O-O groups was significant lower than N-W group.

Pregnancy outcomes

Compared with the N-W patients, those in the O-O group had significantly lower rates of embryo implantation, live birth, and live birth of twins; and a significantly higher rate of late abortion (Table 3). The following rates of pregnancy-related outcomes of the 2 groups were similar: clinical pregnancy, live births of singletons, ectopic pregnancy, and early abortion. The birth weights of singleton and twins were also similar between the 2 groups.

Table 3 Live birth, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss
Full size table

Logistic regression analysis of independent factor with live birth

We conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the independent factors associated with live birth (Table 4). We found that the following were not important predictors of clinical outcomes: age; duration of attempt to conceive; number of days embryos were transferred; number of embryos transferred, and endometrial thickness before FET. However, BMI was a risk factor for lower probability of live birth.

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis potential factors associated with live birth
Full size table

Discussion

This study investigated the efficacy of CHO via the GnRH-ant protocol combined with FET for treatment of infertility in O-O women with PCOS. In a study population of 398 women with PCOS, the outcomes of pregnancy of 138 O-O women were retrospectively evaluated with reference to the outcomes of 260 N-W women. The results indicated that, compared with the N-W patients, the O-O group had significantly lower rates of embryo implantation, live birth, and live birth of twins, and a significantly higher rate of late abortion. The logistic regression analysis indicated that, of the factors analyzed, only BMI was an independent factor affecting the probability of live birth.

PCOS and overweight/obese are common metabolic disorders associated with subfertility [1,2,3,4,5,6], a recent study observed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates between patients with PCOS and those without this syndrome [14]. This appears to indicate that an overweight/obese condition supersedes PCOS as an important factor in female fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

In the year 1998, the World Health Organization determined the overweight and obesity BMI thresholds for Caucasian individuals as 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2, respectively [15]. In 2002, China’s Obesity Working Group proposed adult BMI thresholds of 24.0 and 28 kg/m2 to demarcate an overweight or obese status [11, 12]. In the current study with a Chinese population, we applied a BMI of 24.0 kg/m2 as the demarcation for analysis.

Women in N-W group (n = 265) are almost two times more than O-O group (n = 138) in our study. This result verified a global study showed the percentage of N-W women (63%) are twice as many as O-O women (32%) in China by 2010. While in high-income English-speaking countries and central Afria, the percentages of N-W and O-O are 37% versus 60% and 66% versus 26%, respectively [16]. The overweight/obese is linked to ethnicities, regions, and incomes.

A retrospective cohort study showed that an overweight BMI was no more associated with poor implantation or live-birth rates than normal BMI [17]. However, data regarding the outcomes of IVF/ICSI for patients with PCOS that consider BMI have been inconsistent. For example, O-O patients with PCOS have been reported to have fewer retrieved oocytes, increased rates of miscarriage rates, and lower rates of clinical pregnancy, compared with N-W PCOS patients [18,19,20].

Serum luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and AMH levels putatively reflect ovarian reserve, whereby decreases correlate with reduced quantity and quality of oocytes [21, 22]. In the present study, the GnRH-ant protocol was used to implement COH. Previous study indicated that there are follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and estradiol receptor (ER) localized on adipocyte [23, 24]. As a result, compared with the N-W group, the O-O women required significantly higher doses of Gn, and Gn/kg, and longer periods of ovarian stimulation to retrieve the same number of oocytes and good-quality embryos on day 3. The O-O women with significantly lower serum estradiol both on hCG trigger day and before FET. This result is similar to that of Orvieto et al. [19], in which under the GnRH-ant protocol, PCOS patients with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 used significantly fewer gonadotrophin ampoules to achieve similar periods of ovarian stimulation and numbers of oocytes retrieved.

In the current study, before FET endometrial preparation was performed under conditions of natural, artificial, or induced ovulation cycles. As Yuan et al. [25] discovered, endometrial thickness is an important and independent predictor of pregnancy outcomes after IVF/ICSI treatment. A meta-analysis also showed that an endometrial thickness cut-off of 7 mm (frequently used) correlates with lower chances of pregnancy [26]. In our data, the endometrial thickness before FET reached 8.4 mm, and was not significantly different between the 2 groups. This reduced the possibility that endometrial factors might have disturbed embryo implantation.

Other factors that influence pregnancy outcomes are quantity and quality of transferred embryos. A meta-analysis that compared blastocyst transfer with cleavage-stage embryo transfer showed that neither had an advantage with regard to rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, or live births [27]. In our current study, we transferred similar numbers of cleavage-stage or blastocyst frozen-thawed embryos between the 2 cohorts.

Although we found that the O-O patients had significantly lower rates of embryo implantation, live births, live birth twins, compared with the N-W patients, another Chinese scholar found that women with PCOS and BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 had lower clinical pregnancy rates but similar miscarriage and live birth rates [28]. That study used the standard long GnRH agonist protocol for COH with fresh embryo transfer. In the fresh transfer cycle, women were placed under excessive estrogen and prolactin, which results in ovarian stimulation and can also affect the embryo and endometrial receptivity [29]. In contrast, we chose the GnRH-ant protocol and transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. This is more suitable for patients with PCOS [7, 8], especially because the uterine environment is more natural in the frozen replacement cycle.

In our study, the rate of late abortion was higher in the O-O patients compared with the N-W. We consider that the O-O condition affects embryo implantation.

Our study has the following limitations. First, this is a retrospective study and our results need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials. Second, in this study we only measured endometrial thickness to evaluate its receptivity. However, to ensure best endometrial receptivity, additional indices such as endometrial patterns and endometrial blood flow should be included. The collection of detailed information regarding pregnancy and neonatal complications will allow us to analyze better the effects of being overweight or obese.

Conclusions

In conclusion, although for this population of PCOS patients we applied COH via the GnRH-ant protocol and transferred frozen-thawed embryos, the condition of being overweight or obese remained a risk factor of reduced rates of embryo implantation, live birth, and live birth of twins, and increased the risk of late abortion. These results show that weight loss is particularly important for patients with PCOS. Further studies are needed with larger sample sizes, and thorough follow-ups to assess the long-term safety for neonates.

References

  1. Azziz R, et al. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2745–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hull MG. Epidemiology of infertility and polycystic ovarian disease: endocrinological and demographic studies. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1987;1(3):235–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kjerulff LE, Sanchez-Ramos L, Duffy D. Pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):558. e1-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Legro RS. Obesity and PCOS: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30(6):496–506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cnattingius S, et al. Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):147–52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin JZ, et al. Obstetric complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Depalo R, et al. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:26.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lambalk CB, et al. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5):560–79.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maheshwari A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through invitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fert Steril. 2012;98(2):368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen ZJ, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou BF. Coorperative meta-analysis group of China obesity task, [predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference to risk factors of related diseases in Chinese adult population]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2002;23(1):5–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou B, Cooperative Meta-Analysis Group Of Working Group On Obesity in China. Prospective study for cut-off points of body mass index in Chinese adults. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2002;23(6):431–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotterdam, E.A.-S.P.c.w.g. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heijnen EM, et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(1):13–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. WHO. Obesity. Preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva: WHO; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Di CM, Bentham J, Stevens GA, et al. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Insogna IG, et al. Neutral effect of body mass index on implantation rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2017.

  18. Jungheim ES, et al. Morbid obesity is associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):256–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orvieto R, et al. Ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovary syndrome patients: the role of body mass index. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18(3):333–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozgun MT, et al. The influence of obesity on ICSI outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):245–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stracquadanio M, Ciotta L, Palumbo MA. Relationship between serum anti-Mullerian hormone and intrafollicular AMH levels in PCOS women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017:1–6.

  22. Borges E, et al. The predictive value of serum concentrations of anti-Mullerian hormone for oocyte quality, fertilization, and implantation. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(3):176–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dos SE, Dieudonné MN, Leneveu MC, et al. In vitro effects of chorionic gonadotropin hormone on human adipose development. J Endocrinol. 2007;194(2):313–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson LA, Mcternan PG, Barnett AH, et al. The effects of androgens and estrogens on Preadipocyte proliferation in human adipose tissue: influence of gender and site. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(10):5045.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan X, et al. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF-ICSI cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;33(2):197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasius A, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017.

  28. Huang K, et al. Effect of overweight/obesity on IVF-ET outcomes in chinese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(12):5872–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro BS, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Weiliang Zhang for data collection.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81270868, to XFX), the Innovation of Science and Technology Commission of Guangzhou, China (No.201604020075, to JQL) and the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong, China (No.2016A020218012, to JQL).

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People’s Republic of China

    Rui Chen, Shiping Chen, Manting Liu, Haiyan Xu, Hanyan Liu, Hongzi Du, Xuefeng Xia & Jianqiao Liu

  2. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, People’s Republic of China

    Rui Chen, Shiping Chen, Manting Liu, Haiyan Xu, Hanyan Liu, Hongzi Du, Xuefeng Xia & Jianqiao Liu

  3. Institute for Viral Hepatitis, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Education, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People’s Republic of China

    Hua He

  4. Houston Fertility Laboratory, Houston, TX, 77063, USA

    Weihua Wang

Authors
  1. Rui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manting Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hua He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haiyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hanyan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongzi Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Weihua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xuefeng Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jianqiao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RC designed research. RC, MTL, SPC, HYX, HYL, HZD WHW, XFX and JQL analyzed data. RC, SPC and HH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuefeng Xia or Jianqiao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Since this is a retrospective investigation, patients were not asked to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, R., Chen, S., Liu, M. et al. Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS overweight/obese patients after controlled ovarian stimulation with the GnRH antagonist protocol and frozen embryo transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 16, 36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0352-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0352-z

Keywords

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome
  • Overweight
  • Obesity
  • GnRH antagonist protocol
  • Frozen embryo transfer
  • Pregnancy outcomes