Peer review reports
From: Healthcare utilization and expenditures for chronic and acute conditions in Georgia: Does benefit package design matter?
Original Submission |
22 May 2014 |
Submitted |
Original manuscript
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
Resubmission - Version 2 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 2
|
Resubmission - Version 3 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 3
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
Resubmission - Version 4 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 4
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
Resubmission - Version 5 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 5
|
Resubmission - Version 6 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 6
|
Resubmission - Version 7 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 7
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
Resubmission - Version 8 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 8
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
|
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
Resubmission - Version 9 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 9
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
Resubmission - Version 10 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 10
|
|
Author responded |
Author comments
|
Resubmission - Version 11 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 11
|
Publishing |
19 Feb 2015 |
Editorially accepted |
|
4 Mar 2015 |
Article published |
10.1186/s12913-015-0755-x
|
Learn about peer review