Peer review reports
From: A qualitative study of participants’ views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jun 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kieran O'Doherty |
9 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jodyn Platt |
21 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Merle Spriggs |
20 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Mary Dixon-Woods |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12910-017-0182-0 |