Skip to main content

Approval rates for corneal donation and the origin of donor tissue for transplantation at a university-based tertiary referral center with corneal subspecialization hosting a LIONS Eye Bank

A Correction to this article was published on 24 January 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

With the increasing demand for corneas, eye banks must optimize the tissue donation, collection, and selection process. This retrospective monocentric study analyzed the approval rates for corneal donation and the origin of and reasons for discarding donor corneas from 2010 to 2019.

Methods

Data included the number of deceased, approval or rejection by the family for corneal donation and contraindications. Corneal grafts were included from all deceased persons who were full-body and multi-organ donors at the Saarland University Medical Center (UKS) and from external institutions. Additional analyzed parameters included endothelial cell count (ECC), blood sample serology for infections, and conjunctival swab testing .

Results

A total of 1748 corneoscleral buttons were harvested from 10,265 deceased persons (17% with no contraindication) at the UKS between 2010 and 2019, with a consent rate of 23.3%. The number of explants increased from 136 in 2010 (15% of the deceased, total = 925) to 251 in 2019 (21%, total = 1214). Both the general and department-specific data showed similar percentages for corneal donation over the years, with intensive care and palliative units recently providing the most corneas. The increase in the number of corneas processed by the cornea bank over the years (368 in 2010 compared with 857 in 2019) was linked both to a better internal supply in 2010 (262, 71.2% of the total) compared with 2019 (519, 60.6%) and to an external supply by reinforcement of cooperation with external hospitals, including Luxembourg in 2010 (106, 28.8% of the total) compared with 2019 (338, 39.4%). A total of 195 of 377 corneas (52%) were discarded in 2009 compared with 260 out of 715 (36%) in 2019. The main reasons for discarding were low ECC (36% of discarded corneas in 2009; 11% in 2019), positive conjunctival swab (11% in 2009; 13% in 2019), and blood sample serology (6% in 2009 and in 2019).

Conclusion

Despite an increasing number of donors, the demand for corneas is still rising. Improved cooperation with internal departments and with external clinics has led to an increasing number of explanted corneas. The main reason for discarding corneas was low ECC, followed by a positive conjunctival swab for fungal or bacterial contamination and serology. Increased donation rates and continued improvements in collection and selection processes are necessary to cover the high demand for corneas.

Peer Review reports

Background

Organ transplantation is better known to the public than tissue transplantation despite an increase in tissue transplantation frequency [1, 2]. Transplantable tissues include cardiovascular tissues, musculoskeletal tissues, placenta (amniotic membrane), cells of the pancreatic islets and the human cornea [3].

Keratoplasty, introduced by Zirm in 1905 [4], is the oldest, most common, and most successful tissue transplant worldwide [5]. According to the World Health Organization, globally 1 billion people suffer vision impairment from various causes, including 4.2 million people presenting with corneal opacities [6].

In Germany, the removal of organs and tissues after death is permitted only if the deceased persons have given consent during their lifetime, or if their relatives have given consent on their behalf, considering the presumed will of the deceased [7, 8].

Since the first German organ donation cards were issued in 1971, the number of cardholders in the country has risen continuously, from 12% in 2001 to 39% in 2020 [7]. In a 2020 nationwide representative survey run by the Federal Centre for Health Education (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung) in Germany, 82% of more than 4000 participants showed a positive attitude towards organ and tissue donation [9]. However, only 44% of participants had documented their decision on an organ donor card or in a living will (Fig. 1). An internet-based survey among members of the German Ophthalmological Society (Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft) concerning post-mortem corneal donation revealed that 79.4% of respondents would consent to corneal donation after death, but only 53.9% would be willing to obtain additional details on this subject [10]. In a different questionnaire among university hospital employees, 70.2% of the participants favored post-mortem corneal donation, whereas 57.4% said that they would appreciate more information [11]. Another multicenter survey of 5291 people questioned in various German cohorts showed that 65.2% expressed a willingness to donate [12].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Results of the 2020 nationwide representative survey “Knowledge, attitude and behavior of the general population (aged between 14 and 75 years) for organ and tissue donation” run by the Federal Centre for Health Education on 4001 persons asked in Germany concerning the documentation of the decision to donate organs and tissues [9]

According to the German Keratoplasty Registry, the frequency of performed keratoplasties has increased every year in Germany since 2000, with more than 9000 keratoplasties in 2019 [13] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Number of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties between 2008 and 2019 according to the German Keratoplasty Registry. Note: The term posterior lamellar keratoplasty includes both Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

According to the LIONS Eye Bank data, 609 corneas were transplanted in 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology of the UKS in Homburg/Saar and 652 were transplanted in 2020 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Total number of keratoplasties performed at the UKS Department of Ophthalmology between 2006 and 2020

In Germany, around 5000 patients are on the waiting list for keratoplasty. The demand for corneal tissue increases every year, making corneal donations crucial, but donations remain insufficient to meet need [14]. For this reason, eye banks must optimize the donation, collection, and selection processes for corneas. In this retrospective monocentric study, we analyzed approval rates for corneal donation and the origin of and reasons for discarding donor corneas from 2010 to 2019.

Methods

Settings and Design

In this retrospective, descriptive, monocentric study, we analyzed the approval rates for corneal donation, the origin of donor tissue for corneal transplantation and the cause for discarding corneas from 2010 to 2019 at the Klaus Faber Center, including the LIONS Eye Bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz, within the Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS) in Homburg/Saar, Germany.

LIONS Eye Bank of the UKS in Homburg/Saar (Germany)

The tasks of this institution are to obtain corneas from donors, ensure the quality of the tissue, and prepare the tissues for transplantation, including penetrating keratoplasty, posterior lamellar keratoplasty (including Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty [DMEK] and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty), and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Moreover, the Eye Bank is responsible for the acquisition and preparation of amniotic membranes, in cooperation with the UKS gynecology department, to be used as a graft, patch, or sandwich in cases of persistent epithelial defects and ocular surface inflammation [15].

Sources of donor tissue for transplantation

The corneas transplanted in our facility are derived from deceased persons, including full-body donors in the Department of Anatomy [16, 17], multi-organ donors, and donors from external institutions in Germany or other countries (Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Italy). To obtain corneas from the site of the UKS, the employees of the Eye Bank have a permanent internal access to online reports about the deceased, available since 2004 through the internal hospital information system, where deaths are reported in real time by each department According to the German Organ Transplantation Foundation (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation), relatives are asked about the presumed will of the deceased if there is no organ donation card. In the absence of objections to the corneal explantation, a medical employee of the Eye Bank calls the department or the primary care physician to ask about the patient’s health history and to fill out the donor anamnesis protocol to determine possible contraindications (Table 1) inhibiting corneal removal. If there are no contraindications, the 15-mm corneoscleral button can be removed up to 72 h after cardiac arrest, according to the German regulations. However, explantation of donor corneas is usually performed within 24 h in our department because of the necessity of simultaneous blood sampling. The so-called “brain death problem”, the age of the deceased and a history of cataract surgery do not present obstacles regarding corneal donation. The donor corneas are replaced by a plastic shell and the eyelids are closed, leaving the facial expression unchanged. During the corneal removal, a blood sample and conjunctival swab are taken for examination. Because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, a nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 also has been taken since March 2020 [18]. These procedures are applied on all days, including non-working days such as weekends and holidays.

Table 1 List of the contraindications to corneal explantation

The external facilities providing corneas included Luxembourg and collaborate clinics in Germany. Corneas were cultivated and prepared according to the protocol described below. To meet the demand for keratoplasties performed in our department, the Eye Bank also obtains corneas from cooperating Eye Banks from Aachen, Mainz, Venice, Rostock, the German Society for Tissue Transplantation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gewebetransplantation: DGFG), Bio Implant Services (BIS) in the Netherlands (human leukocyte antigen-matched corneas exclusively), and others. These tissues are ready for transplantation and are ordered on demand and availability.

Preparation of donor corneas for transplantation

After explantation, corneas were placed in an organ culture medium, in two sequentially used formulations. Medium I was isotonic (307 mOsmol/kg) and consisted of 10% minimal essential medium, antibiotics (1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% amphotericin B), 1% L-glutamine, 1.25% HEPES buffer, 3% NaHCO3, and 2% fetal calf serum. Medium II was formulated the same way but included the addition of a deswelling substance, e.g., dextran T500 6% (Arandal, Alchimia, Italy). The addition of dextran T500 6% alters the osmolarity of the organ culture medium from 307 mOsmol/kg to 353 mOsmol/kg, making the medium hyperosmotic .

At the time of explantation, the donor corneas were first placed into a transport medium, i.e., medium II. In the Eye Bank, corneas were transferred into organ culture medium I under strict sterile conditions, where they remained for a maximum of 28 days with medium exchange every 7 days. Before keratoplasty, corneas were transferred into organ culture medium II for deswelling for a maximum of 4 days. According to Hamon et al., corneas could be transplanted as soon as 12 to 24 h after transfer to medium II [19]. The corneas were stored at 34–37 °C. Endothelial cells were counted by specular microscopy, and slit lamp exams were performed twice during the cultivation period to detect scars or signs of previous surgeries. Information about cataract surgery, diabetes, chemotherapy, or causes of death such as sepsis in the donor history was obtained, although this information does not necessarily reduce the suitability of corneal donor tissue (Kramp et al. [20]). Sterile donor tomography has been routinely performed in donors corneas since 2018 to detect curvature abnormalities (e.g., keratoconus or status post-refractive surgery [21, 22]. After all of these procedures, tissues were approved to be transplanted.

Data collection

This study included 10,265 deceased persons considered by the Klaus Faber Center, including LIONS Eye Bank Saar-Lor-Lux Trier/Westpfalz as potential cornea donors. For all deceased persons, approval or rejection rates for donation were analyzed. In case of approval, we analyzed the origin of the donor tissue, the presence or absence of contraindications and the results of the Eye Bank screening for endothelial cell count (ECC), conjunctival swabs, and serological analysis. We compared these results for each year between 2010 and 2019. Trends in corneal discarding as well as numbers of corneas delivered by external facilities were also analyzed over the years.

Statistical analysis

The collected data included categorical variables, which are presented as absolute number and percentage.

Results

Development of approval rates

Between 2010 and 2019, a total of 1748 corneoscleral buttons (17%) were removed from 10,265 deceased persons in the UKS. The number of deceased persons increased from 925 in 2010 to 1214 in 2019 (Fig. 4). The numbers of consent, refusals, and donations grew proportionately, peaking at 251 explants of 1214 deceased in 2019 (21%), compared with 136 of 925 in 2010 (15%) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Number of deceased persons, refusals and approvals to the corneal donation and corneas removed (1 donor = 2 corneas) at the UKS in Homburg/Saar between 2010 and 2019

Fig. 5
figure 5

Percentage of cornea explantations, as well as contraindications and refusals to corneal donations in the years 2010–2019. The red line shows the percentage of consents of relatives to corneal explantation, including a small proportion of contraindications

Fig. 5 shows the number of consents and contraindications to the corneal explant. In some cases, contraindications for explantation existed despite approval, and these corneas were not explanted. The averaged values over this period were 23.3% for consent, 55.3% for refusal to donate, and 17% for removal itself. Both the general and department-specific data showed approximately the same percentages of corneal donation over the years. The pulmonology and cardiology, intensive care, neurology, and neurosurgery units, along with palliative ward (established in October 2016) had the most corneal donations. The trends among the departments are shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Data showing the units with most recorded corneal donations at the UKS – pulmonology and cardiology, intensive care, neurology, neurosurgery, and palliative wards. Note: The palliative unit exists since October 2016

Development of corneal donations and tissue rejection

The LIONS Eye Bank closely cooperates with other ophthalmological departments in Germany, Luxembourg (since 2013), Italy, Austria, and the Netherlands, as well as with the DGFG. Figure 7 presents the increasing number of donated corneas from the UKS, Luxembourg, and the external facilities, as well as corneas processed elsewhere since 2010 Fig. 8 shows the ratios of percentages of corneas obtained and processed at UKS together with corneas obtained from external facilities, including Luxembourg, in comparison with corneas processed in other eye banks and bought by the Eye Bank of the UKS Department of Ophthalmology during 2010–2019. The LIONS Eye Bank acquires processed ready-to-use corneal tissue from several facilities (Fig. 9).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Number of donated corneas from UKS, Luxembourg and the external facilities to our Eye Bank, as well as corneas processed in other Eye Banks and bought by the UKS Eye Bank from 2010 to 2019. Note: The official cooperation with Luxembourg did not exist before 2013

Fig. 8
figure 8

Percentage of the corneas obtained from UKS, and the corneas obtained from external facilities but processed in Homburg compared to the corneas processed in different Eye Banks and bought ready-to-use by the Eye Bank of the UKS in the years 2010–2019

Fig. 9
figure 9

Number of corneas ready-to-use that have been bought from external Eye Banks in the years 2010–2019. BIS = Bio Implant Services; GBM-V = Gewebebank, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Rostock; DGFG = German Society for Tissue Transplantation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gewebetransplantation). Note: BIS is responsible for the human leukocyte antigen-matched corneas exclusively; number 6 – Others – represents delivery facilities not mentioned before

Since 2009, we have collected data on the reasons for corneal discarding, e.g., insufficient endothelial cell count, positive conjunctival swab, or positive serology with 195 of 377 corneas (52%) discarded in 2009, compared with 260 of 715 (36%) in 2019. The highest number of transplants suitable for surgery – 301 of 453 corneas (66%) – was documented in 2015 (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Percentage and reasons for discarding corneas since 2009 – overall number of tissue contamination, endothelial cell count (ECC), conjunctival swab and serology being the main reasons for corneal rejection

Discussion

The number of keratoplasties increases every year, and the number of patients on the waiting list for corneal transplantation continues to rise. According to the LIONS Eye Bank data, 609 corneas were transplanted in 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology of the UKS in Homburg/Saar and 652 were transplanted in 2020 (Fig. 3). The number of deceased persons increased from 925 in 2010 to 1214 in 2019, while the proportion of consents has remained at around one quarter, resulting in 15–21% explantations over the last decade. In 2019, 359 people donated 715 corneas after their death, while there were 349 patients on the waiting list for a transplant in Homburg alone. Overall, around 5000 patients across Germany are still waiting for a donor cornea, and, the number of corneas donated at UKS obviously is not enough.

This situation explains why the trend is to acquire ready-to-use corneas bought from external facilities, as the percentage of corneas being prepared for transplantation by the Eye Bank has not kept pace. For various specific reasons, the department in Mainz was the major source of corneas at first, followed later by Aachen and DGFG, and most recently Rostock .

Several factors can influence the willingness to donate corneas and tissue suitability for transplantation. In the absence of a previously expressed wish for or against organ donation, the physician in charge of the treatment or a medical employee of the Eye Bank asks the deceased’s next of kin about the presumed will of the deceased. In a difficult situation of grief and despair, such a question can lead to additional stress, which may in turn influence the decision and result in the refusal of the corneal explant [11, 17]. In our study, an average of 23.3% of the family members of the deceased person agreed to the corneal donation, and 55.3% declined it. The emotionally difficult situation after the death of a close relative, together with limited knowledge about procedures for transplantation, brain death-related problems, and tissue suitability after the death of a potential donor, may lead to an unwillingness to donate [14].

A positive development is the much higher number of people with organ donor cards in Germany, at 39% in 2020 compared with 12% in 2004 [14]. Thus, an examination of decision trends in years is important. Of note, the willingness to donate may differ depending on socioeconomic group and country region, as analyzed by Uhlig et al. in three studies [10,11,12]. Their three separate analyses had something in common: most of the participants expressed an intention to donate corneas post-mortem as well as an interest in receiving additional information about donation and suggested the Internet as the most appropriate source of information on this subject.

As part of our selection process, we first obtained the consent of all potential donors and then clarified possible contraindications. This sequential procedure explains why not all corneas consented for harvest were harvested. Despite consent to corneal donation, we do not explant corneas after 24 h following death. German regulations, which are based on EU regulations, preclude taking the blood sample required for analysis after this time. Therefore, another factor in whether corneas are harvested can be a delayed report of a death to our Eye Bank, which would make the timely collection of the cornea impossible. For this reason, it is essential to continuously work on improving communication among different departments to avoid the loss of potential donors because of organizational problems.

All corneas were closely examined prior to their use in surgery. Examinations were done either at the LIONS Eye Bank or externally, depending on the tissue source. According to German regulations, the minimum ECC required is 2000 cells/mm2 for keratoplasty and 1000 cells/mm2 for urgent keratoplasty or anterior lamellar keratoplasty. In our ophthalmology department, we use only transplants with >2000 cells/mm2 for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty because of the risk of intraoperative endothelial perforation with the need to convert the operation to penetrating keratoplasty [23], and we use >2200 cells/mm2 for DMEK. Additional requirements for DMEK are no donor diabetes and a donor age > 55 years. Kramp et al. examined 4140 corneas for factors possibly influencing the suitability and, in some cases, leading to discarding of donor corneas [20]. Based on their findings, information about cataract surgery, diabetes, chemotherapy or causes of death such as sepsis in the donor history should be obtained, although this history does not necessarily reduce the suitability of corneal donor tissue. These conditions as well as the results of the conjunctival swab and serology will define the final suitability of the tissue.

The introduction in November 2010 of a quality management system at the LIONS Eye Bank had a major impact on the rate and reasons for discarding corneas, thanks to improved standards, protocols, and training [24]. After evaluation of 4140 corneas between 2006 and 2016, Laun, Kramp et al. reported that the rate of discarded corneas because of poor endothelial quality, contamination of the medium, or positive conjunctival swab decreased significantly from 50.1 to 39.7%. Similarly, we found that 52% of corneas were discarded in 2009, compared with 36% in 2019. The main reason for discarding of corneas tended to be an insufficient ECC, followed by a positive conjunctival swab for fungal rather than for bacterial contamination and finally by the serology. However, the endothelial quality as the main cause of tissue rejection has shown a downward trend over the last decade, with 36% being discarded in 2009 and only 11% in 2019. The reasons for this continuous decrease are multifactorial. One factor could be additional quality controls at the Eye Bank [24] that tended to improve graft quality but could have resulted in discarding of the cornea prior to ECC measurement. Better ECC may be attributable to improved eye surgery techniques (minimally invasive procedures, endothelial protection using viscoelastics for cataract surgery) or to Eye Bank procedures such as cooling of donor bodies before cornea collection, shorter time between death and collection (typically <12 h versus 3 days in 2009), and an improved cultivation process (cleanroom since 2019). It is also plausible that compared with 2009, from 2015 we were able to better assess donor endothelium with a new inverted specular microscope (Primovert, Co. Zeiss) and an analysis tool assisting technicians in evaluating endothelial cells (REA XDL, Co. Robin), potentially leading to fewer discarded corneas. In addition, regular training of Eye Bank technicians who had been continuously replaced over the decade and the predominance of these technicians in doing the harvesting rather than less experienced residents could have resulted in less endothelial damage and thus less ECC-based discarding.

The conjunctival swab for fungi became a part of the diagnostics in 2014, as did a more detailed serology examination, including testing for hepatitis B/C, HIV, and syphilis. These results show how important critical selection and additional testing are to ensure the best transplant quality .

Li et al. analyzed the correlation between positive conjunctival swabs and microbial contamination of the culture medium, where donor corneas are held prior to transplantation [25]. They found a significantly higher contamination rate of the culture medium in cases of contaminated conjunctival swabs, which was subsequently a reason for discarding the tissue, as we found in the current work. The timing of post-mortem blood sample collection, the time between death and corneoscleral button excision, and storage time all seem to be important factors as well [20, 26]. Kramp et al. found that when blood sample collection took place more than 12 h after death, corneas were discarded more often because of positive donor serology [20]. According to Röck et al., a prolonged time from storage and death to corneoscleral button explantation is associated with an increased risk of tissue unsuitability for transplantation. Because we remove corneoscleral buttons up to 24 h after cardiac arrest, it could be beneficial to consider tissue removal in the first 12 h after death [26].

Compared to the findings of Schaub et al. who reported 235 (5.1%) corneas from 4593 patients, donated after death from 2011 and 2015 [27], we found that 1748 (17%) corneoscleral buttons were donated from 10,265 deceased persons in the UKS between 2010 and 2019. The increasing absolute number of corneas explanted in our department seems to be quite favorable and promising. This observed growth in corneal explants also may have resulted from the practice of performing corneal explants daily, including on non-working days. Doctors on duty during weekends or holidays checked the routine online report of deceased persons every morning through the internal hospital information system and, in the absence of objections to the corneal explantation, ensured that corneas were obtained right away.

Conclusions

We found that 1748 corneoscleral buttons (17%) were taken from 10,265 deceased persons between 2010 and 2019 at UKS. The removed donor corneas were critically selected and tested for potential contamination before transplantation into people with eye injury or disease. The main reasons for discarding corneas were insufficient ECC, positive conjunctival swab and blood sample serology, with 52% of 377 corneas discarded in 2009 but only 36% of 715 in 2019. In addition, the number of excised donor corneas increased from 136 in 2010 (15%) to 251 in 2019 (21%). The demand for corneal tissue continues to grow, and making the choice to donate tissues post-mortem should be further popularised.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available on request to the corresponding author.

Change history

Abbreviations

BIS:

Bio Implant Services

DGFG:

German Society for Tissue Transplantation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gewebetransplantation)

DMEK:

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

ECC:

Endothelial cell count

GBM-V:

Gewebebank, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

UKS:

Saarland University Medical Center

References

  1. Seitz B, Naumann GOH. Transplantationen – Unerwähnt: Hornhauttransplantation. (Leserbrief). Dtsch Arztebl. 2001;47:A3114.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Act on the donation, removal and transfer of organs and tissues. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tpg/TPG.pdf (2007). Accessed 29 Sep 2020.

  3. German Society for Tissue Transplantation. Tissue donation. https://gewebenetzwerk.de/gewebespende/ (2019). Accessed 30 Sep 2020.

  4. Zirm EK. A successful total keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1906;64:580–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Health Resources and Services Administration. U.S. Government Information on Organ Donation and Transplantation. https://www.organdonor.gov/about/facts-terms/history.html (2019). Accessed 28 Sep 2020.

  6. World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment (2020). Accessed 28 Sep 2020.

  7. German Organ Transplantation Foundation. Organ donor card. https://www.dso.de/organspende/allgemeine-informationen/organspende-in-deutschland/ organspendeausweis (2020). Accessed 29 Sep 2020.

  8. Federal Centre for Health Education. Organ Donation. https://www.organspende-info.de/organspendeausweis-ja-oder-nein.html (2020). Accessed 28 Sep 2020.

  9. Federal Centre for Health Education. Nationwide representative survey 2020: “Knowledge, attitude and behavior of the general population (age of 14–75) for organ and tissue donation” https://www.bzga.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF/pressemitteilungen/ daten_und_fakten/Info-Blatt-16.-September-2020.pdf (2020). Accessed 30 Sep 2020.

  10. Uhlig CE, Promesberger J, Hirschfeld G, Koch R, Reinhard T, Seitz B. Results of an internet-based survey amongst members of the German Ophthalmological Society concerning postmortem cornea donation. Ophthalmologe. 2012;109:1198–206.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uhlig CE, Koch R, Promesberger J, Hirschfeld G, Schmidt H, Seitz B, et al. Attitudes toward postmortem cornea donation in Germany: a multicenter survey. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1955–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uhlig CE, Böhringer D, Hirschfeld G, Seitz B, Schmidt H. Attitudes Concerning Postmortem Organ Donation: A Multicenter Survey in Various German Cohorts. Ann Transplant. 2015;20:614–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flockerzi E, Maier P, Böhringer D, Reinshagen H, Kruse F, Cursiefen C, et al. Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seitz B, Blüthner K, Kruse F, Reinhard T, Sundmacher R. Hornhauttransplantation – Zu geringe Spendenbereitschaft. Dtsch Arztebl. 2004;101:A3326–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seitz B, Resch MD, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Sauer R, Kruse FR. Histopathology and Ultrastructure of Human Corneas After Amniotic Membrane Transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1487–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin C, Tschernig T, Hamon L, Daas L, Seitz B. Corneae from body donors in anatomy: valuable use for transplantation and experimental research. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tschernig T, Seitz B. The transplantation of corneae from cadavers can prevent blindness. Clin Anat. 2019;32:58–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamon L, Bayyoud T, Seitz B. Ocular Findings in Patients with COVID-19: Impact on Eye Banking [Letter]. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2051–2. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S317378.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamon L, Daas L, Mäurer S, Weinstein I, Quintin A, Schulz K, et al. Thickness and curvature changes of human corneal grafts in dextran-containing organ culture medium before keratoplasty. Cornea. Published ahead-of-print 30.12.2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002543.

  20. Kramp K, Suffo S, Laun D, Bischoff-Jung M, Huber M, Langenbucher A, et al. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Suitability of Donor Corneas in the LIONS Cornea Bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz from 2006 to 2016. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2020;237:1334–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mäurer S, Asi F, Rawer A, Damian A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Concept for 3D measurement of corneal donor tissue using a clinical OCT. Ophthalmologe. 2019;116:640–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Quintin A, Hamon L, Mäurer S, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Comparison of sterile donor tomography in the eye bank and graft tomography after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-020-01256-6 [Epub ahead of print].

  23. Daas L, Hamon L, Ardjomand N, Safi T, Seitz B. Excimer laser-assisted DALK: a case report from the Homburg Keratoconus Center (HKC). Ophthalmologe. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01342-3 [Epub ahead of print].

  24. Laun D, Suffo S, Kramp K, Bischoff-Jung M, Huber M, Langenbucher A, et al. Impact of the introduction of the Quality Management System on the rate and reasons for discarding human organ-cultured corneas at the LIONS eye bank Saar-Lor-Lux, Trier/Westpfalz from 2006 to 2016. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2021; online ahead of print.

  25. Li S, Bischoff M, Schirra F, Langenbucher A, Ong M, Halfmann A, et al. Correlation between microbial growth in conjunctival swabs of corneal donors and contamination of organ culture media. Ophthalmologe. 2014;111:553–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Röck T, Hofmann J, Thaler S, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Yoeruek E, et al. Factors that influence the suitability of human organ-cultured corneas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaub F, Simons HG, Enders P, Bachmann BO, Roters S, Cursiefen C, et al. Corneal donation: Dilemma between growing demand and declining donor rate. Ophthalmologe. 2016;113:1058–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BS conceived and designed the study. BS and AAW constructed the checklist. AAW, IW, LH, EF and BS wrote the manuscript. AAW created figures and a Table. IW, LH, LD, EF, SS and BS provided comments on and additions to the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agata Anna Wykrota.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Saarland University Medical Center as well as the local ethics committee (Ethikkomission des Ärztekammer des Saarlandes).

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations with an informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Following the publication of the original article, we were notified of a mistake in the Abstract: The phrase: "The number of keratoplasties increased from 136 in 2010 (15% of the deceased, total = 925) to 251 in 2019 (21%, total = 1214)."  Should read: "The number of explants increased from 136 in 2010 (15% of the deceased, total = 925) to 251 in 2019 (21%, total = 1214).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wykrota, A.A., Weinstein, I., Hamon, L. et al. Approval rates for corneal donation and the origin of donor tissue for transplantation at a university-based tertiary referral center with corneal subspecialization hosting a LIONS Eye Bank. BMC Ophthalmol 22, 17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02248-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02248-7

Keywords

  • Cornea
  • Eye bank
  • Organ donation
  • Organ donor card
  • Corneal transplantation
  • Keratoplasty