Peer review reports
From: How well did the consensus methods apply in the guideline development of traditional Chinese medicine: a web-based survey in China
Original Submission |
5 Jun 2023 |
Submitted |
Original manuscript
|
Resubmission - Version 2 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 2
|
Resubmission - Version 3 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 3
|
4 Sep 2023 |
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
7 Sep 2023 |
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
25 Sep 2023 |
Author responded |
Author comments - Yutong Fei
|
Resubmission - Version 4 |
25 Sep 2023 |
Submitted |
Manuscript version 4
|
25 Sep 2023 |
Author responded |
Author comments - Yutong Fei
|
Resubmission - Version 5 |
25 Sep 2023 |
Submitted |
Manuscript version 5
|
26 Sep 2023 |
Author responded |
Author comments - Yutong Fei
|
Resubmission - Version 6 |
26 Sep 2023 |
Submitted |
Manuscript version 6
|
9 Oct 2023 |
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
20 Oct 2023 |
Reviewed |
Reviewer Report
|
Resubmission - Version 7 |
|
Submitted |
Manuscript version 7
|
Publishing |
30 Oct 2023 |
Editorially accepted |
|
10 Nov 2023 |
Article published |
10.1186/s12874-023-02087-0
|
Learn about peer review