Peer review reports
From: Modelling of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay as a quality measure: a problematic exercise
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Dec 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deepak Bhonagiri |
8 Apr 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
28 Jun 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
22 Jul 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jul 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
31 Aug 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deepak Bhonagiri |
1 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
1 Sep 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Sep 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12874-023-02028-x |