Abstract
The rate of secular variation occasionally undergoes a sudden, sharp change, called a geomagnetic jerk. Such jerks have been detected in geomagnetic time series, centered—over the last four decades—around 1971, 1980, 1991, and 1999; others have been inferred from historical records. The geomagnetic jerks represent a reorganization of the secular variation, implying an internal origin, as established through spherical harmonic and wavelet analysis. However, some characteristics of jerks are not well understood. Here we estimate the occurrence dates for geomagnetic jerks, as they can be detected from a global geomagnetic model. This choice makes the present study novel, for two reasons. First, utilizing the comprehensive modelling approach allows for the use of a secular variation signal free of time-varying external fields and their corresponding induced counterpart, and observatory biases. Second, the model utilizes satellite data when available, in addition to observatory data. Indeed, POGO (1967 to 1971), MAGSAT (1979 to 1980), Ørsted (1999 to present time) and CHAMP (2000 to present time) satellite measurements help to separate the different magnetic sources. In this study the CM4 comprehensive model is used for a global search of geomagnetic jerks and their occurrence dates. Our first result indicates that found geomagnetic jerks might not have been worldwide in occurrence. Moreover, the obtained dates suggest that jerks detected in the CM4 model over the last four decades occurred not simultaneously but at slightly different times around 1971, 1980 and 1991.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrescu, M., D. Gibert, G. Hulot, J.-L. Le Mouël, and G. Saracco, Detection of geomagnetic jerks using wavelet analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12557–12572, 1995.
Alexandrescu, M., D. Gibert, G. Hulot, J.-L. Le Mouël, and G. Saracco, Worldwide analysis of geomagnetic jerks, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21975–21994, 1996.
Bloxham, J., S. Zatman, and M. Dumberry, The origin of geomagnetic jerks, Nature, 420, 65–68, 2002.
Chau, H. D., J. Ducruix, and J.-L. Le Mouël, Sur le caractère planétaire du saut de variation séculaire de 1969–1970, C. R. Acad. Sci. B, 298, 157–160, 1981.
Courtillot, V., J. Ducruix, and J.-L. Le Mouël, Sur une accélération récente de la variation séculaire du champ magnétique terrestre, C. R. Acad. Sci. D, 287, 1095–1098, 1978.
De Michelis, P., L. Cafarella, and A. Meloni, Worldwide character of the 1991 jerk, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 377–380, 1998.
Friis-Christensen, E., A. De Santis, A. Jackson, G. Hulot, A. Kuvshinov, H. Lühr, M. Mandea, S. Maus, N. Olsen, M. Purucker, M. Rothacher, T. Sabaka, A. Thomson, S. Vennerstrom, and P. Visser, Swarm. The Earth’s Magnetic Field and Environment Explorers, ESA SP-1279(6), 2004.
Jackson, A., A. Jonkers, and M. Walker, Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 358, 957–990, 2000.
Langel, R. A., T. J. Sabaka, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, The near-Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled, Phys. Earth Planet Inter., 98, 235–267, 1996.
Le Huy, M., M. Alexandrescu, G. Hulot, and J.-L. Le Mouël, On the characteristics of successive geomagnetic jerks, Earth Planets Space, 50, 723–732, 1998.
Mandea, M. and E. Dormy, Asymmetric behavior of magnetic dip poles, Earth Planets Space, 55, 153–157, 2003.
Mandea, M. and B. Langlais, Observatory crustal magnetic biases during MAGSAT and Ørsted satellite missions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL013693, 2002.
Mandea Alexandrescu, M., D. Gibert, J.-L. Le Mouël, G. Hulot, and G. Saracco, An estimate of average lower mantle conductivity by wavelet analysis of geomagnetic jerks, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 17735–17745, 1999.
Mandea, M., E. Bellanger, and J.-L. Le Mouël, A geomagnetic jerk for the end of 20th century?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 183, 369–373, 2000.
Nagao, H., T. Iyemori, T. Higuchi, S. Nakano, and T. Araki, Local time features of geomagnetic jerks, Earth Planets Space, 54, 119–131, 2002.
Nagao, H., T. Iyemori, T. Higuchi, and T. Araki, Lower mantle conductivity anomalies estimated from geomagnetic jerks, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B5), 2254, doi:10.1029/2002JB001786, 2003.
Sabaka, T. J. and R. T. Baldwin, Modeling the Sq magnetic field from POGO and MAGSAT satellite and contemporaneous hourly observatory data, HSTX/G&G-9302, Hughes STX Corp., 7701 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD, 1993.
Sabaka, T., N. Olsen, and R. A. Langel, A comprehensive model of the quiet-time, near-Earth magnetic field: phase 3, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 32–68, 2002.
Sabaka, T., N. Olsen, and M. E. Purucker, Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 521–547, 2004.
Stewart, D. N. and K. Whaler, Geomagnetic disturbance fields: An analysis of observatory monthly means, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 215–223, 1992.
Wessel, P. and W H. F, Smith, Free software helps map and display data. EOS Trans. AGU, 72, 445–446, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chambodut, A., Mandea, M. Evidence for geomagnetic jerks in comprehensive models. Earth Planet Sp 57, 139–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352558
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352558