Background

The unique and exemplary physical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have spurred interest in a wide range of applications including nanoelectronics, nanocomposites, and gas storage[1, 2]. Different growth techniques exist to synthesis the CNTs, such as arc discharge and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Large quantity, good quality, and high degree of control of the CNTs can be obtained by the catalytic CVD techniques[3]. Recently, scientific groups dealt with the mechanism of the formation of carbon nanotubes. The role of pretreatment[4, 5] and the size of catalyst nanoparticles have been particularly discussed[6, 7]. The study shows that the yield of CNT preparation significantly depends on metal particles on supported catalysts. Increase of catalyst nanoparticle loading and good dispersion are useful ways to obtain a high yield of CNTs[810].

According to the above points, in this study, we describe the effect of the sudden insertion of catalyst nanoparticles into the CVD reactor to produce CNTs for the first time. The aim was to enhance CNT productivity and to control their diameters. The resulting CNTs were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Philips, MAG 15 kV, ×30,000, SE detector microscope, (Philips Tecnai) FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (CM10, 100 kV, Philips).

Methods

The MgO-supported Co3O4 catalyst nanoparticles (Co3O4/MgO) was prepared by simple impregnation method. In the first step, 1g of MgO powder was dispersed in 50 ml of ethanol, sonicated for 30 min, and stirred at 75°C. The desired weight percent of Co(NO3)2.6H2O was then dissolved in 25 ml of ethanol and was then added dropwise (0.5 ml/min) to the above solution. After completion, the mixture was stirred for 1 h and dried at 120°C on a hot plate, and the sample was calcined in an oven under 550°C for 2 h. Co3O4/MgO catalytic substrates were prepared in four different concentrations of Co3O4 (10, 20, 30, and 40 wt.%).

CNTs were synthesized by the catalytic decomposition of acetylene at different temperatures (500°C to 975°C) over Co3O4/MgO using CVD method under atmospheric pressure. Next, 50 mg of catalyst powder was dispersed uniformly on a quartz boat. Two different procedures were used for this work. In the first method, the conventional method[4, 7, 11], the catalyst was placed in the center of a quartz tube. The CVD furnace was heated to a desired temperature in the atmospheric pressure. Subsequently, argon was fed at a flow rate of 300 sccm for 15 min. A mixture of acetylene (15 sccm) and carrier gas (150 sccm) was introduced into the quartz tube and maintained at the reaction temperature for 15 min before the furnace was cooled down to room temperature under Ar protection. In the second method (the focus of this work), while keeping constant Ar carrier gas flow at 150 sccm, temperature of the furnace was raised to a desired temperature for the growth of CNTs. The quartz boat (containing the catalyst powder) was then placed directly in the middle of the furnace as acetylene gas was flowing simultaneously (with a flow rate of 15 sccm), and synthesis process of CNTs started suddenly. The synthesis of CNTs was carried out by pyrolysis of the acetylene feed gas for 15 min.

Results and Discussion

In order to investigate the effect of the catalyst's sudden initiation to the reaction zone of the CVD furnace on the growth of CNTs, carbon yield in two different mentioned methods was compared. The carbon yield was calculated using the following equation:

Carbon yield = M Total - M Cat /M Cat ×100%
(1)

where MTotal is the total mass of the final catalyst and carbon products and MCat is the initial mass of catalyst. The results of four different weight percentages of Co3O4 are shown in Figure 1. Comparing Figure 1a with Figure 1b, it can be seen that carbon yield in the second method (sudden initiation of catalyst) is considerably higher than the first one (conventional method). This is an important point that other researchers did not pay attention to. On the other hand, for temperatures higher than 800°C and contents more than 30 wt.%, carbon yield decreases rapidly in the first method compared with that in the second one wherein higher carbon yield is achieved. This can be a result of thermal shock, caused by the sudden entrance of catalyst in the reaction zone with high temperature, which then crumbles the aggregated catalyst nanoparticles. This in fact increases the number of nanoparticles implied for CNT growth and the carbon yield, whereas in the first method, catalyst maintenance in that high temperature of furnace causes more aggregation of catalyst nanoparticles which then form bigger particles and therefore less carbon yield.

Figure 1
figure 1

Carbon yield (%) as a function of Co 3 O 4 loadings (wt.%) at different temperatures. (a) Synthesis of CNTs on calcined catalyst for 15 min (conventional method), and (b) the synthesis of CNTs that started suddenly.

SEM (Figure 2) studies reveal that CNTs were produced over Co3O4/MgO (20 and 40 wt.%) catalysts prepared under sudden initiation conditions cited above (magnification of all images is 1 μm). The existence of intertwined CNTs in Figure 2 indicates that 600°C is the appropriate temperature for the reduction of cobalt oxide nanoparticles, and the high catalyst activity for both weight percentages of catalyst (20 and 40 wt.%) is high. However, we cannot see any tubular structure such as fibers with abnormal and large diameters. As a conclusion from this result, we can suggest a uniformity of distribution in size of the initial catalyst nanoparticles. Results show that a lower temperature corresponds to thinner and less accessible CNTs, while a high temperature is for thicker diameter CNTs and increased carbon impurities because of the increase in size of nanoparticles and faster reaction rate. The reduced amount of CNTs was attributable to the catalyst partial surface deactivation. These results are in accordance with those reported by other researchers[12, 13]. In contradiction to reported literatures[8, 14], efficient CNT production can be achieved when pre-temperature procedure is not used. We believe that if we do not heat the nanoparticles before synthesis of CNTs, the production might improve by keeping Co3O4 nanoparticles active for nucleation. Using this process, a high percentage of catalysts resulted in CNTs with low diameters and high yield without any negative effects reducing the production rate, and this is what we were trying to achieve.

Figure 2
figure 2

The SEM images of synthesized CNTs under sudden initiation conditions. At 600°C (a 1 , a 2 ), 700°C (b 1 , b 2 ), 800°C (c 1 , c 2 ), and 900°C (d 1 , d 2 ) with C2H2over Co3O4/MgO for 20 wt.% (indexed by 1) and 40 wt.% (indexed by 2).

For more investigation, TEM analysis was used to observe the structure and diameter of CNTs. In Figure 3, the TEM image of nanotubes grown on 20 wt.% of Co3O4 at 600°C is shown. Their quality is high, and they show smooth walls with low impurity and by-product content. Also, most of the products have hollow structures, and they are CNTs; there is no fiber in the TEM image. In the TEM image, the diameter distribution of produced CNTs is in the range of 10 to 22 nm, and the average diameter is about 15 nm.

Figure 3
figure 3

TEM image of synthesized CNTs at 600°C with C 2 H 2 over Co 3 O 4 /MgO for 20 wt.%.

Figure 4 shows the scattered temperature-diameter data between 600°C and 900°C with C2H2 over Co3O4/MgO for different weight percentages of Co3O4. A wide range of CNT diameters can be effectively synthesized over a range of temperatures. This scattered temperature-diameter data had shown a positive diameter-temperature relationship between 600°C and 900°C. This happens because of the difference in the diffusion rate of catalyst nanoparticles into each other in different temperature ranges.

Figure 4
figure 4

The scattered temperature-diameter data from 600°C to 900°C over Co 3 O 4 /MgO. This is for(a) 10, (b) 20, (c) 30,and (d) 40 wt.%.

Conclusions

In this work, we used a novel strategy for the synthesis of CNTs with high carbon yield by a sudden initiation of catalyst in the CVD reactor that resulted from the rapid growth of CNTs taking place just before the new aggregation of crumbled catalyst nanoparticles under thermal shocking. However, we compare this new process with the conventional method for synthesis of CNTs.