Current evidence for predictive, preventive, and personalized strategy for endometrial hyperplasia
Women's health and gender-related pathology remain the priorities for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM) [1, 2]. Relevance of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) study is primarily due to a high risk for malignant transformation and the problems associated with menstrual irregularities, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, and anemia in women. Endometrial hyperplasia has a significant place in the structure of gynecological morbidity in women of reproductive age and is one of the most frequent causes of hospitalization in gynecology hospital (10% to 18%) [3].
Endometrial hyperplasia may cause endometrial cancer in up to 50% of cases [4]. The incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma, which ranks first among genital malignancies, not only has remained high but in recent years has tended to significantly increase in many countries, including Ukraine, and according to long-term prognosis, it will not diminish anytime soon [3, 5]. Endometrial cancers are the most common gynecologic cancers in developed countries [6]; therefore, careful search for malignancy, particularly in women with multiple risk factors, is advised by many researchers in daily practice [6, 7]. With the high rate of endometrial hyperplasia recurrence, the risks of malignancy require further improvement and new approaches to diagnosis and treat of this disease should be found [8]. Additional studies on histological features and immunohistochemical profiles are needed to find associations between endometrioid and high-grade endometrial carcinoma and endometrial pathology. Differences in the immunohistochemical expression of p53, B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), bax, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), progesterone receptor antagonists (PA), etc. should be properly assessed to find the most common diagnostic pitfalls and helpful morphological and immunohistochemical markers.
Endometrial hyperplasia in reproductive-aged women
The endometrium of reproductive-aged women undergoes cyclic developmental changes in response to the steroids - estrogen and progesterone.
The highest score of ERs and PRs is observed in the epithelial and stromal cells of the normal endometrial uterine at the early proliferative phase; then, throughout the secretory phase, the ER and PR scores decline. In typical endometriotic lesions, the ER and PR scores are constantly high, but they are independent of the menstrual cycle. The expression pattern of ER mRNA is reported mostly in parallel with that of ERs. In typical endometriosis, ERs and PRs are found in both glandular epithelial cells and in their surrounding stromal cells. Expression of ER mRNA was found in typical endometriotic peritonea and in the pelvic peritoneum with columnar epithelial cells, but not in the normal pelvic peritoneum (mesothelium). Estrogen receptors and PRs were found negative in the mesothelium but were positive in the nuclei of fibroblasts in the connective tissue [9].
Gregory et al. postulated that an increased in the coactivator expression may render the endometrium to be more sensitive to estrogen [10]. Specific coactivator expression patterns were found in the fertile endometrium and in anovulatory (proliferative) and clomiphene-induced ovulatory (secretory) women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), who have a higher likelihood of developing estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Women with PCOS exhibited elevated levels of amplified in breast cancer-1 (AIB1) and transcriptional intermediary factor-2 expression in both the epithelial and stromal cells [10]. Their receptors are regulated by steroid receptor coactivators of the p160 family, namely steroid receptor coactivator-1, AIB1, and transcriptional intermediary factor-2, in the human endometrium obtained prospectively from normal fertile women throughout the menstrual cycle. Glandular AIB1 increases in the late secretory phase [10]. The authors described an increased expression of ERα (an estrogen-induced gene product) during the menstrual cycle in the PCOS endometrium and overexpression of p160 in the endometrium of women with PCOS. These data explain the poor reproductive performance observed in PCOS and the increased incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer noted in this group of women.
The effects of estradiol (E), progesterone (P), and PA were studied on the endometrium of rhesus macaque [11]. Ovariectomized macaques were treated with implants of E and P to induce precisely controlled, artificial menstrual cycles. During these cycles, treatment with E alone induces an artificial endometrial epithelial cell proliferation and increased expression of stromal and epithelial ER and PR. Androgen receptor E in the endometrial stroma is also upregulated. Progesterone acts on the E-primed endometrium to induce secretory differentiation and causes suppression of epithelial and stromal ER, epithelial PR, and stromal AR in the functionalis zone. However, epithelial ER and PR are retained in the basalis zone during the secretory phase. When potent PA are administered acutely at the end of an E(2) + P-induced cycle, menses typically ensues similarly to P withdrawal at the end of the menstrual cycle. When PAs are administered chronically, there is significant blockage of all P-dependent effects including upregulation of ER, PR, and AR and suppression of glandular secretory function. However, chronic PA administration also inhibits estrogen-dependent endometrial cell proliferation and growth. This experimental data endometrial anti-proliferative effect is the basis of the clinical use of PA to control various diseases such as endometriosis [11].
Atypical endometrial hyperplasia
Atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) has the highest cancer threat; the prevalence of endometrial carcinoma in patients who had a community hospital biopsy diagnosis of AEH was high (42.6%). When considering management strategies for women who have a biopsy diagnosis of AEH, clinicians and patients should take into account the considerable rate of concurrent carcinoma [12]. Malignant tumors after AEH diagnosis demonstrate features of good prognosis with endometrioid morphology, lower grade, and early stage, although the overall positive predictive value of AEH is expected at 37% to 48% in the current routine practice [13].
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial cancer is frequently seen in women with post-menopausal bleeding and endometrial hypertrophy in ultrasound examination, especially when the endometrial image is non-homogenous and irregular. However, the rarest endometrial cancers were affirmed in post-menopausal women with the ultrasound image of fluid in the uterine cavity with thin endometrium [14].
Endometrial cancers are classified into types I and II based on light microscopic appearance, clinical behavior, and epidemiology. This classification of endometrial cancers considers genetic analysis, and histologic subtypes are underscored by systematic changes in a limited set of genes. Common genetic changes in endometrioid endometrial cancers include, but are not limited to, microsatellite instability or specific mutation of PTEN, K-ras,12,22-28, and β-catenin genes [15].
Type I comprises 70% to 80% of newly diagnosed cases of endometrial cancer, is associated with unopposed estrogen exposure, and is often preceded by a pre-malignant disease.
Type II of endometrial cancers has a non-endometrioid histology (usually papillary serous or clear cell) with an aggressive clinical course. Hormonal risk factors have not been identified, and there is no readily observed pre-malignant phase. Combined molecular, histomorphometric, and clinical outcome analysis of premalignant lesions has provided a clearer multidisciplinary definition of endometrial pre-cancers, known as EIN. Genetic and endocrine disease mechanisms have been integrated into a multistep model for oncogenesis in which hormonal exposures act as selection factors for mutated endometrial cells [15].
The findings of Kounelis et al. [16] indicate the differences in immunohistochemical profiles of endometrioid and serous carcinomas. Thus, uterine papillary serous adenocarcinomas (UPSA) show a significantly higher p53 expression than uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas; there is no significant difference in Bcl-2 and bax expression between both histologic types. Overexpression of p53 is associated with high-grade endometrioid carcinoma and advanced-stage tumors, while ER and PR expressions were associated with low-grade and early-stage tumors. Bcl-2 immunopositivity is more common in low-grade, early-stage adenocarcinomas rather than in high-grade, advanced-stage adenocarcinomas, but the difference was not statistically significant. Bax immunopositivity is associated with well-differentiated and early-stage tumors. There was a significant inverse relationship between bax and p53 reactivity, especially in tumors of endometrioid type [16, 17]. Early detection of p53 nuclear accumulation may help to identify precursor lesions of UPSA. Bcl-2 persistence is frequently associated with endometrial carcinoma, and failure to inactivate Bcl-2 expression probably is related to the development of endometrial carcinoma [17].
The presence of testosterone receptors in estrogen receptor-positive endometrial carcinomas may be involved in the mechanism of cell proliferation in these tumors. The strong staining reaction for testosterone receptors in the endometrial glands can be considered one of the features of invasive malignancy [18].
Bartoschet et al. [19] suggest differential diagnosis between the different subtypes of endometrial carcinomas including (1) endometrioid versus serous glandular carcinoma, (2) papillary endometrioid (not otherwise specified, villoglandular and non-villous variants) versus serous carcinoma, (3) endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cells, hyalinization, and heterologous components versus malignant mixed Müllerian tumor, (4) high-grade endometrioid versus serous carcinoma, (5) high-grade endometrioid carcinoma versus dedifferentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma, (6) endometrioid carcinoma with clear cells versus clear cell carcinoma, (7) clear cell versus serous carcinoma, (8) undifferentiated versus neuroendocrine carcinoma, (9) carcinoma of mixed cell types versus carcinoma with ambiguous features or variant morphology, (10) Lynch syndrome-related endometrial carcinomas, and (11) high-grade or undifferentiated carcinoma versus non-epithelial uterine tumors. As carcinomas in the endometrium are not always primary, this becomes the differential diagnosis between endometrial carcinomas and other gynecological, as well as with extra-gynecologic metastases.
Breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen (Tam) are at an increased risk for developing endometrial carcinomas, possibly due to the partial estrogenic effect of Tam on endometrial cells. Progestational therapy has not routinely been included in Tam regimens. The consistent finding of ER and PR expression in the endometria of post-menopausal women receiving Tam further supports the suspected estrogenic effect exerted by Tam on endometrial cells. Progestational therapy could be beneficial in the prevention of Tam-induced abnormal endometrial proliferations [20].
Mutter et al. showed that 43% of histologically normal pre-menopausal endometria contain rare glands that fail to express the PTEN tumor suppressor gene because of mutation and/or deletion. This persists between menstrual cycles. Histopathology of PTEN-null glands is initially unremarkable, but with progression, they form distinctive high-density clusters. These data are consistent with a progression model in which initial mutation is not rate limiting [21].
A physiologic process of apoptosis involved in the cyclic growth of normal endometrium [22, 23] can be induced by extrinsic factors such as chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation [24]; the oncoprotein Bcl-2 is a well-known regulator of cellular apoptosis, inhibiting physiologic process [25]. Progestin-induced apoptosis may occur during the early period of treatment for endometrial hyperplasia [26]. Fas-Fas binding plays a fundamental role in the regulation of the immune system, triggers apoptosis, and may be involved in the development of endometrial hyperplasia [27]. Bax/Bcl-x may be the major control mechanisms of apoptosis in advanced carcinomas; other members of the Bcl-2 family may also be under hormonal control [28].
Fas-related apoptotic pathway is also involved in the regulation of apoptosis in the endometrial tissue and promotes the development and progression of endometrial neoplasia, considering a significant increase of Fas, caspase-3, and M30 expressions in carcinomas [29].
Transition of endometrial epithelium from hyperplasia to cancer seems to involve both increased apoptosis and decreased Bcl-2 expression. Flow cytometric evaluation of M30 and Bcl-2 expression levels, with SPF, in curettage specimens from post-menopausal patients complaining of bleeding provides a quantitative assessment of endometrial apoptosis, anti-apoptosis, and proliferation. Further studies are needed to determine the relationship among these three processes as indicators of the biological behavior of gynecological tumors [30].
Evidence for the existence of adult stem/progenitor cells in human and mouse endometrium is now emerging because functional stem cell assays are being applied to uterine cells and tissues [31].
Polyps
Polyps from the endometrium cause abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, and pelvic pain [32]. Endometrial polyps undergo cyclic changes in the expression of their proteins related to proliferation and apoptosis during the menstrual cycle, similar to those of the cycling endometrium [33].
The concentrations of ER and PR in the glandular epithelium were significantly higher in endometrial polyp than in the normal endometrium. The concentrations of these receptors in the glandular epithelium and stroma were similar in the post-menopausal and pre-menopausal patients [34].
Mittal et al. concluded that endometrial polyps may be a result of a decrease in ER and PR expression in stromal cells. Because of these receptor-negative stromal cells, endometrial polyps may relatively be insensitive to cyclic hormonal changes [32]; while the concentrations of ER and PR in glandular epithelium were higher in polyps than in the normal endometrium, the concentrations of these receptors in the glandular epithelium and stroma are similar in the post-menopausal and pre-menopausal patients. The study by Peng [35] that measured the expression of hormone receptors (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) in endometrial polyps and compared the results to surrounding endometrial tissue in women prior to menopause showed that the expression of estrogen receptor was higher whereas the expression of progesterone receptor was lower than that of the adjacent endometrial tissue. The results suggest that the abnormal expression of hormone receptor contributes to endometrial polyp formation. Fujishita et al. demonstrated the expression of ERs, ER mRNA, and PRs in the columnar cells of the pelvic peritonea and typical endometriosis, but not in the normal mesothelium. These results suggest that endometriosis may originate from the columnar cells with ERs and PRs in the pelvic peritoneal lining [9].
Endometrial polyps can appear in menopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy despite the presence of progestins to oppose the action of estrogens [36]. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) impacts on the expression of Ki-67, Bcl-2, and c-erb.B2 in endometrial polyps during menopause and may cause endometrial polyp involution by decreasing proliferation and stimulating apoptosis [37].
Vereide AB showed that proteins in the apoptotic cascade are regulated by gestagen; stromal Bcl-2 expression is a potential biomarker which can separate responders of gestagen treatment from non-responders after oral administration [38]. Part of the molecular mechanisms of progestin therapy for endometrial hyperplasia is through the upregulation of Fas/FasL expression [27]. Dysregulation of Fas/FasL expression in hyperplastic endometrium may be part of the molecular mechanisms for non-responders to progestin treatment. Intermittent, rather than continuous, progestin treatment may be more effective clinically for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.
Taylor et al. [39] demonstrated three significant differences found between the endometrium and the polyps. Polyps taken from the proliferative phase of the cycle displayed a significantly elevated expression of Bcl-2 and a weak or no expression of progesterone receptors. Secretory phase polyps displayed an elevated expression of estrogen receptors.
A localized increase in Bcl-2 expression and consequential decline or cessation of apoptosis are important mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of endometrial polyps. Elevated Bcl-2 expression results in failure of the polyp tissue from undergoing normal cyclical apoptosis during the late secretory phase [39–41]. This may mean that the polyp is not shed along with the rest of the endometrium during menstruation.
However, estrogen may have a role in the development of post-menopausal endometrial polyps, either by direct stimulation of localized proliferation or by stimulation of proliferation via other pathways, such as activation of Ki67 or through inhibition of apoptosis via Bcl-2. The c-erbB-2 is unlikely to play any role in the development of these lesions [42]. Ki-67 and c-erbB2 overexpressions are frequent in endometrial polyps in post-menopausal women [43].
Endometrial polyps in menopausal patients receiving HRT respond only to estrogens, but not to progestins. The unopposed estrogenic action on polyps may favor the development of pre-malignant hyperplasia and carcinoma [44].
Ultrasound
Ultrasound diagnosis has been successfully used to differentiate tumors of the uterus and appendages [45–52]. Transvaginal ultrasound is a cost-minimizing screening tool for perimenopausal and post-menopausal women with vaginal bleeding [45] and is preferred over uniform biopsy of post-menopausal women with vaginal bleeding because it (1) is a less invasive procedure, (2) is generally painless, (3) has no complications, and (4) may be more sensitive for detecting carcinoma than blind biopsy. Transvaginal sonography is rarely non-diagnostic. A limitation of ultrasound is that an abnormal finding is not specific: ultrasound cannot always reliably distinguish between benign proliferation, hyperplasia, polyps, and cancer; that should not be seen as a crucial limitation because tissue sampling is required in either case. Ultrasonography also may be used as a first-line investigation in other populations with abnormal uterine bleeding. In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 400 women with abnormal uterine bleeding by Davidson and Dubinsky [45], the investigators found that transvaginal sonography combined with Pipelle endometrial biopsy and outpatient hysteroscopy was as effective as inpatient hysteroscopy and curettage [45]. Occasionally (in 5% to 10% of cases), a woman's endometrium cannot be identified on ultrasound, and these women also need further evaluation.
Transvaginal ultrasonography has a poor positive predictive value but has a high negative predictive value for detecting serious endometrial diseases in asymptomatic post-menopausal women[46]. A limit of M-echo thickness at 8 mm [47] or 10 mm [48] was suggested for this category of patients, as the upper limit for normal thickness was also suggested on a value of 9 mm in women receiving treatments associated with thicker endometria (estrogen alone and cyclical combinations) [49–51].
The negative predictive value for ultrasonography was high (99%) when the threshold for endometrial thickness was 5 mm. This high negative predictive value is not a justification for the use of ultrasonography in screening since 53% of the women with normal biopsies were reported to have an endometrial thickness of at least 5 mm [46].
Nordic multicenter study showed that the risk of finding pathologic endometrium at curettage when the endometrium is <4 mm as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography is 5.5%. Thus, in women with post-menopausal bleeding and an endometrium <4 mm, it would seem justified to refrain from curettage [52]. According to Fleischer et al., the sampling rate of women with an endometrial thickness >6 mm was too low (45%) for confidence interval in the positive predictive value of 2%. Despite a high negative predictive value (99%), transvaginal ultrasonography may not be an effective screening procedure for the detection of endometrial abnormality in untreated post-menopausal women who are without symptoms [53].
Ultrasound imaging of endometrium with atypical hyperplasia in post-menopausal women was found non-homogenous and irregular, and the rarest was in the cases of affirmed fluid in uterine cavity [14].
According to statements of the Consensus of Society of Radiologists [54], the following recommendations were used to create an algorithm for evaluating women with post-menopausal bleeding:
-
Because post-menopausal bleeding is the most common presenting symptom of endometrial cancer, when post-menopausal bleeding occurs, clinical evaluation is indicated;
-
Either transvaginal sonography or endometrial biopsy could be used safely and effectively as the first diagnostic step. Whether sonography or endometrial biopsy is used initially depends on the physician's assessment of patient risk, the nature of the physician's practice, the availability of high-quality sonography, and patient preference. Similar sensitivities for detecting endometrial carcinoma are reported for transvaginal sonography, when an endometrial thickness >5 mm is considered abnormal, and for endometrial biopsy, when ‘sufficient’ tissue is obtained. Currently, with respect to mortality, morbidity, and quality-of-life end points, there are insufficient data to comment as to which approach is more effective [55–57].
A combination of transvaginal sonography, Pipelle endometrial biopsy, and outpatient hysteroscopy (1) has similar efficacy to inpatient hysteroscopy and curettage for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding; (2) hysteroscopy will detect some fibroids and polyps missed by a combination of transvaginal ultrasound and Pipelle endometrial sampling; (3) the quality of histological samples obtained by outpatient Pipelle were comparable to those obtained by formal inpatient curettage; and (4) outpatient procedures were well tolerated, with good patient acceptability [58].
Sonoelastography
Today, a new non-invasive method of examination, sonoelastography (SEG), which is based on the ultrasonic examination of tissues softness, is constantly developing. SEG as a tissue strain imaging was first described in 1991 [59]. The phenomenon is based on the fact on inverse scattering ultrasonic signal in mild compression and relaxed (i.e. approximately 2%) insonated tissue during the study. The main advantage of such a diagnosis is its high sensitivity. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding endometrial assessment using SEG. Thus, Preis et al. [60] in a group of 35 perimenopausal patients obtained a sensitivity value of sonoelastography for endometrium hyperplasia as high as 100%. However, the bigger group of patients has to be analyzed to confirm specificity and accuracy. Recently, we suggested the use of blue-green-red (BGR) sonoelastography artefact as a sign to indicate the presence of fluid content in cavities for predicting the liquid content and the possibility for puncture. Ovarian cyst sonoelastography can be effective for liquid detection and has an 88% positive predictive value [61].
Treatment
Taking into account the fact that the sensitivity to hormone therapy and prognosis of EH in women is largely determined by receptor status, which depends on the clinical stage and degree of histological differentiation of endometria, the aim of our study was to determine the characteristics of endometrial receptors using immunohistochemical methods [3, 8].
On the other hand, we are aware of a percentage of patients whose progestin treatment does not give the desired results; we believe that it is this category of patients that is subject to special individual approach to treatment and observation. After hormonal treatment, EH relapses occurred in 15%, 9% to 27%, and 2% of patients due to the morphological heterogeneity of endometrial proliferation. The sensitivity to therapy and prognosis are largely determined by the receptor status.
Existing methods such as cryosurgery, laser destruction and electrodestruction, and thermoablation may lead to irrevocable destruction of the endometrium. The practice of minimally invasive ablation made possible the removal of the endometrium basal layer.
Hysteroresection of the endometrium is considered to be the most reliable technique for the management of endometrial pathology and uterine bleeding because it provides information on the histologic characteristics of endometrium, removal of the tissue within a prescribed depth, and coagulation of bleeding sites.
Hysteroscopy is likely to become the new gold standard in the future because of its ability to visualize directly the endometrium and perform directed biopsies as indicated. As office-based hysteroscopy becomes more practical and widespread, the technique may become more cost effective. An evaluation plan using transvaginal sonography as the initial screening evaluation followed by endometrial biopsy or, more likely, hysteroscopy is likely to become the standard of care.
In recent years, with the introduction of new endoscopic technology, the range of surgical treatment methods for this category of patients has expanded, particularly for those patients with concomitant somatic pathology. One of these innovative treatments is endometrial ablation, the essence of which is the hysteroscopic removal of the basal layer in order to achieve amenorrhea [3]. Reliable visual control ensures efficiency of minimally invasive technologies in all spheres of gynecologic practices.
It remains unproven whether certain patients at higher risk for carcinoma should proceed directly to invasive evaluation. Patients on tamoxifen with persistent recurrent bleeding, those with significant risk factors for carcinoma, and patients with life-threatening hemorrhage comprise this group. Further studies are still necessary to evaluate high-risk patients and determine whether ultrasound or biopsy is really the most cost-effective initial test [45].
These facts confirm the need to determine a new integrative view assessing the state of receptor systems and sonography data for each case, to reach a personalized treatment strategy.
The aims of this strategy were as follows:
-
to assess the state of receptor systems in endometrial hyperplasia,
-
to evaluate the capabilities of ultrasound diagnostics and sonoelastography for diagnosis of endometrial pathology and control minimally invasive treatment,
-
to develop algorithm for personalized treatment for patients with endometrial hyperplasia with regard to age, integrative assessment of immunohistochemical, and radiology biomarkers.