Background

Idiopathic scoliosis is a 3D deformity of the trunk with detectable bony asymmetries and deformities, not only of the spine - the central axis - but also of the rib cage and other parts of the body. The thorax, like any other part of the skeleton, displays variations in dimensions and proportions [1]. The bony framework of the thorax changes so that the side to side width of the chest cavity exceeds progressively the anteroposterior length, while the ribs become structurally stronger as the child grows up [1–3]. Review of literature reveals that in IS the post-operative correction of the thoracic deformity after application of full transpedicular screw has never been compared to hybrid constructs, using the Rib-Index (RI) [4, 5].

The aim of this report is to study whether there is a difference of the post-operative RHD correction between these two constructs.

Methods and material

Sixteen patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) were operated using a full pedicle screw construct (group A) (Figure 1), while nine were treated using a hybrid construct (group B) (Figure 2). Fourteen out of the sixteen patients in group A had right and two had a left thoracic curve; seven curves were Lenke’s type 3C, six type 1A, two type 2A and one 6C. Among the 9 patients of the group B, 4 scoliotics had Lenke’s type 1A curves, 3 type 6C and 2 type 2A. The median age for group A was 15 years and for group B 17.2 years. The RHD was assessed on the lateral spinal radiographs using the RI, as it was described by Grivas et al 2002 [3]. Moreover the amount of RI correction was calculated by subtracting the post-operative RI from the pre-operative RI. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test, (IBM SPSSv.20 package). In order to access the data of the patients this study was approved by the Ethical & Scientific Committee for Clinical Research at "ATTIKON" Hospital.

Figure 1
figure 1

Patient group A The patients of this group were operated upon using a full pedicle screw construct.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Patient group B The patients of group B were operated upon using an hybrid construct.

Full size image

Results

In group A the mean pre-operative RI was 1.93 and the post-operative 1.37 (p<0.001) (Figure 3). Similarly in group B the mean pre-operative RI was 2.06, while the mean post-operative 1.51, (p=0.008) (Figure 4). However, between group A and B the post-operative correction RI mean values were not statistically significant (p=0.803) (Figure 5).

Figure 3
figure 3

Pre and Post-operative RI of the group A The following charts show the pre- and post-operative RI of the patients of group A.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

Pre- and Post- operative RI of the group B The following charts show the pre- and post-operative RI of the patients of group B.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Correlation of post-operative RI correction between groups A and B. The correlation of the post-operative RHD correction between the two groups was not statistically significant different. The following boxplot depicts the lack of statistical significance.

Full size image

Discussion

The scoliosis surgery techniques evolved from the Harrington era and the advent of new technologies proved to be promising. A challenging question is what type of surgical instrumentation offers better rib-hump correction: a full screw or an hybrid construct? The full screw construct is more powerful and therefore frequently used. However this study reveals that whatever the type of instrumentation used, there was no statistically significant post-operative difference in correction between the two groups, in terms of RHD. The RHD more likely seems to result from the asymmetric rib growth than from vertebral rotation.

There are certain limitations in this study that is its retrospective nature, the limited number of patients involved and the relative heterogeneity of the curve types.

Conclusions

Although the pre- and post-operative RI correction was significant within the two studied groups of patients, none of the two constructs used offered better RHD correction. Provided that the full screw construct is powerful, the post-operative derotation and the RHD correction should have been better corrected than with an hybrid construct, yet this was not the case in this study. This discordance between the ribcage and the spine behavior after surgery could be attributed to a different scoliogenic course and this could have potential aetiological implications. It seems likely that the thoracic deformity contributes to RHD more than the potential vertebral rotation.

This is the extended abstract of IRSSD 2014 program book [6].

Consent

The ethical & scientific committee of "ATTIKON" Hospital has approved the use of patients data and imaging respecting their privacy, for the purpose of the retrospective clinical study titled <Rib hump deformity assessment using the rib index in adolescent idiopathic scoliotics treated with full screw or hybrid constructs: aetiological implications>. Patients were informed prior medical services or admission to the University Hospital "ATTIKON" that imaging and other medical data could be used in teaching and academic purposes.