Background
HTLV-1 proviral load (PVL) is considered a risk marker for diseases.
Methods
Quantification of HTLV-1 PVL was performed in 151 samples of 38 asymptomatic carriers (AC) collected at different times during follow-up (6.1 to 14.8 years, mean 10) and in samples of five individuals who developed HAM/TSP during follow-up (2.6 to 11.3 years, mean 7.2). We used SYBR Green and number of proviral copies/10,000 cells. Fluctuation of proviral load level was defined at 0.5 log or more.
Results
PVL was stable in 52.6% (20/38) and floated in 47.4% (18/38) subjects. In AC, the median of PVL in the 1st sample was 85 and in the last 59 (p = 0.59). Among those individuals with low PVL who showed fluctuation, it remained low (£1%) in 77.8%. In 60% with high PVL who showed fluctuation, it remained high during follow-up. 10 patients developed HAM/TSP during the follow-up, and PVL was quantified before and after in 5 cases. Median of PVL in the 1st sample was 445, and in the last sample 98 (p = 0.56). In all cases, PVL was higher in the asymptomatic period, declining after onset of HAM/TSP.
Conclusions
PVL reaches a plateau, characteristic of each individual; high PVL appears to be followed by decrease and stabilization in lower levels. Although PVL is supposedly a risk marker for HAM/TSP, it had modest prognostic value in our cohort; changes in clinical status and PVL did not coincide, besides occurrence of high stable PVL in AC. Hemominas/FAPEMIG/DECIT/MS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, P.C., Freitas, G.S., Romanelli, L.C. et al. Follow-up of HTLV-1 positive individuals in the GIPH cohort (1997-2013): Proviral load was not a prognostic marker for HAM/TSP. Retrovirology 11 (Suppl 1), P23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-11-S1-P23
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-11-S1-P23