Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
24 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John LaManca |
14 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
24 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Donath |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
4 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
28 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-91 |