Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Grabenstein |
4 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Hortal |
10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Postma |
18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jon Kim Andrus |
8 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Grabenstein |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Postma |
11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
13 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
13 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
12 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-53 |