Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
2 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero |
10 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer |
17 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh |
15 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
25 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fernando Ferrero |
25 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nader Shaikh |
29 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Wyer |
14 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
14 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
23 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
23 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
23 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
23 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-10 |