1 Introduction

The generalized Laguerre polynomials are defined by

exp ( x t 1 t ) ( 1 t ) α + 1 = n = 0 L n α (x) t n (αQ with α>1).
(1.1)

From (1.1), we note that

L n α (x)= r = 0 n ( 1 ) r ( n + α n r ) x r r ! ( see [1–3] ) .
(1.2)

By (1.2), we see that L n α (x) is a polynomial with degree n. It is well known that Rodrigues’ formula for L n α (x) is given by

L n α (x)= x α e x n ! ( d n d x n ( e x x n + α ) ) ( see [1–3] ) .
(1.3)

From (1.3) and a part of integration, we note that

0 x α e x L m α (x) L n α (x)dx= Γ ( α + n + 1 ) n ! δ m , n ,
(1.4)

where δ m , n is a Kronecker symbol. As is well known, Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

t e t 1 e x t = e B ( x ) t = n = 0 B n (x) t n n ! ( see [1–29] ) ,
(1.5)

with the usual convention about replacing B n (x) by B n (x).

In the special case, x=0, B n (0)= B n are called the n th Bernoulli numbers. By (1.5), we get

B n (x)= l = 0 n ( n l ) B n l x l ( see [1–29] ) .
(1.6)

The Euler numbers are defined by

E 0 =1, ( E + 1 ) n + E n =2 δ 0 , n ( see [27, 28] ) ,
(1.7)

with the usual convention about replacing E n by E n .

In the viewpoint of (1.6), the Euler polynomials are also defined by

E n (x)= ( E + x ) n = l = 0 n ( n l ) E n l x l ( see [11–24] ) .
(1.8)

From (1.7) and (1.8), we note that the generating function of the Euler polynomial is given by

2 e t + 1 e x t = e E ( x ) t = n = 0 E n (x) t n n ! ( see [15–29] ) .
(1.9)

By (1.5) and (1.9), we get

2 e t + 1 e x t = 1 t ( 2 2 2 e t + 1 ) ( t e x t e t 1 ) =2 n = 0 ( l = 0 n E l + 1 l + 1 ( n l ) B n l ( x ) ) t n n ! .
(1.10)

Thus, by (1.10), we see that

E n (x)=2 l = 0 n ( n l ) E l + 1 l + 1 B n l (x).
(1.11)

By (1.7) and (1.8), we easily get

t e t 1 e x t = t 2 ( 2 e x t e t + 1 ) + ( t e t 1 ) ( 2 e x t e t + 1 ) .
(1.12)

Thus, by (1.12), we see that

B n (x)= k = 0 , k 1 n ( n k ) B k E n k (x).
(1.13)

Throughout this paper, we assume that αQ with α>1. Let P n ={p(x)Q[x]|degp(x)n} be the inner product space with the inner product

p ( x ) , q ( x ) = 0 x α e x p(x)q(x)dx,

where p(x),q(x) P n . From (1.4), we note that { L 0 α (x), L 1 α (x),, L n α (x)} is an orthogonal basis for P n .

In this paper, we give some interesting identities on Bernoulli and Euler polynomials which can be derived by an orthogonal basis { L 0 α (x), L 1 α (x),, L n α (x)} for P n .

2 Some identities on Bernoulli and Euler polynomials

Let p(x) P n . Then p(x) can be generated by { L 0 α (x), L 1 α (x),, L n α (x)} in P n to be

p(x)= k = 0 n C k L k α (x),
(2.1)

where

p ( x ) , L k α ( x ) = C k L k α ( x ) , L k α ( x ) = C k 0 x α e x L k α ( x ) L k α ( x ) d x = C k Γ ( α + k + 1 ) k ! .
(2.2)

From (2.2), we note that

C k = k ! Γ ( α + k + 1 ) p ( x ) , L k α ( x ) = k ! Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 1 k ! 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) p ( x ) d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) p ( x ) d x .
(2.3)

Let us take p(x)= m = 0 , m 1 n ( n m ) B m E n m(x) P n . Then, from (2.3), we have

C k = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) m = 0 , m 1 n ( n m ) B n E n m ( x ) d x = ( 1 ) k Γ ( α + k + 1 ) m = 0 , m 1 n k l = k n m ( n m ) ( n m l ) B m E n m l l ! ( l k ) ! 0 x l + α e x d x = ( 1 ) k Γ ( α + k + 1 ) m = 0 , m 1 n k l = k n m ( n m ) ( n m l ) B m E n m l l ! ( l k ) ! Γ ( l + α + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k m = 0 , m 1 n k l = k n m ( n m ) ( n m l ) B m E n m l l ! ( l k ) ! ( l + α ) ( l + α 1 ) α ( α + k ) ( α + k 1 ) α = ( 1 ) k n ! m = 0 , m 1 n k l = k n m B m m ! E n m l ( n m l ) ! ( l + α l k ) .
(2.4)

Therefore, by (2.1) and (2.4), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1 For n Z + , we have

From (1.13), we can derive the following corollary.

Corollary 2.2 For n Z + , we have

B n (x)=n! k = 0 n ( 1 ) k ( m = 0 , m 1 n k l = k n m B m m ! E n m l ( n m l ) ! ( l + α l k ) ) L k α (x).

Let us take p(x)= l = 0 n ( n l ) E l + 1 l + 1 B n l (x). By the same method, we get

C k = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) l = 0 n ( n l ) E l + 1 l + 1 B n l ( x ) d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) l = 0 n k m = 0 n l ( n l ) ( n l m ) E l + 1 l + 1 B n l m 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) x m d x = ( 1 ) k Γ ( α + k + 1 ) l = 0 n k m = k n l ( n l ) ( n l m ) E l + 1 l + 1 B n l m m ! ( m k ) ! Γ ( m + α + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k l = 0 n k m = k n l ( n l ) ( n l m ) m ! ( m k ) ! E l + 1 ( l + 1 ) B n l m ( α + m ) ( α + m 1 ) α ( α + k ) ( α + k 1 ) α = ( 1 ) k n ! l = 0 n k m = k n l ( α + m m k ) E l + 1 ( l + 1 ) ! B n l m ( n l m ) ! .
(2.5)

Therefore, by (1.11), (2.1), and (2.5), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3 For n Z + , we have

E n ( x ) 2 =n! k = 0 n ( 1 ) k ( l = 0 n k m = k n l ( α + m m k ) E m + 1 ( m + 1 ) ! B n m l ( n m l ) ! ) L k α (x).

For nN with n2 and m Z + with nm0, we have

B n m ( x ) B m ( x ) = r { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } B 2 r B n 2 r ( x ) n 2 r + ( 1 ) m + 1 ( n m ) ! m ! n ! B n P n ( see [8] ) .
(2.6)

Let us take p(x)= B n m (x) B m (x) P n . Then p(x) can be generated by an orthogonal basis { L 0 α (x), L 1 α (x),, L n α (x)} in P n to be

p(x)= k = 0 n C k L k α (x).
(2.7)

From (2.3), (2.6), and (2.7), we note that

C k = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) p ( x ) d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) r = 0 [ n 2 ] { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } × B 2 r n 2 r 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) B n 2 r ( x ) d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) r = 0 [ n 2 ] { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } B 2 r n 2 r × l = 0 n 2 r ( n 2 r l ) B n 2 r l 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) x l d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) r = 0 [ n 2 ] l = 0 n 2 r { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } ( n 2 r l ) × B 2 r B n 2 r l n 2 r 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) x l d x = ( 1 ) k Γ ( α + k + 1 ) r = 0 [ n k 2 ] l = k n 2 r { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } ( n 2 r l ) × B 2 r B n 2 r l l ! ( n 2 r ) ( l k ) ! Γ ( α + l + 1 ) .
(2.8)

It is easy to show that

Γ ( α + l + 1 ) Γ ( α + k + 1 ) ( l k ) ! = ( α + l ) ( α + l 1 ) α Γ ( α ) ( α + k ) ( α + k 1 ) α Γ ( α ) ( l k ) ! = ( α + l ) ( α + l 1 ) ( α + k + 1 ) ( α k ) ! = ( α + l l k ) .
(2.9)

By (2.8) and (2.9), we get

C k = ( 1 ) k r = 0 [ n k 2 ] l = k n 2 r { ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) } × ( n 2 r l ) ( α + l l k ) l ! B 2 r B n 2 r l ( n 2 r ) .
(2.10)

Therefore, by (2.7) and (2.10), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.4 For nN with n2 and m Z + with nm0, we have

B n m ( x ) B m ( x ) = k = 0 n ( 1 ) k { r = 0 [ n k 2 ] l = k n 2 r ( ( n m 2 r ) m + ( m 2 r ) ( n m ) ) × ( n 2 r l ) ( α + l l k ) l ! B 2 r B n 2 r l ( n 2 r ) } L k α ( x ) .

It is easy to show that

t 2 e t ( x + y ) ( e t 1 ) 2 =(x+y1) t 2 e t ( x + y 1 ) e t 1 t 2 d d t ( e t ( x + y 1 ) e t 1 ) .
(2.11)

From (2.11), we have

k = 0 n ( n k ) B k (x) B n k (y)=(1n) B n (x+y)+(x+y1)n B n 1 (x+y) ( see [11] ) .
(2.12)

Let x=y. Then by (2.12), we get

k = 0 n ( n k ) B k (x) B n k (x)=(1n) B n (2x)+(2x1) B n 1 (2x).
(2.13)

Let us take p(x)= k = 0 n ( n k ) B k (x) B n k (x) P n . Then p(x) can be generated by an orthogonal basis { L 0 α (x), L 1 α (x),, L n α (x)} in P n to be

p(x)= k = 0 n ( n k ) B k (x) B n k (x)= k = 0 n C k L k α (x).
(2.14)

From (2.3), (2.13), and (2.14), we can determine the coefficients C k ’s to be

C k = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) p ( x ) d x = 1 Γ ( α + k + 1 ) { ( 1 n ) 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) B n ( 2 x ) d x + n 0 ( d k d x k x k + α e x ) ( 2 x 1 ) B n 1 ( 2 x ) d x } .
(2.15)

By simple calculation, we get

(2.16)

and

(2.17)

Therefore, by (2.13), (2.14), (2.15), (2.16), and (2.17), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.5 For n Z + , we get