# Analysis and experimental evaluation of rate adaptation with transmit buffer information

- 2.8k Downloads

## Abstract

In hardware, packet loss may happen due to overflow at a finite-depth transmit buffer in addition to the packet corruption in the channel. To reduce such losses and further improve spectral efficiency via rate selection, we exploit either statistical or instantaneous knowledge of transmit buffer occupancy and source packet distribution in IEEE 802.11-based systems, which have highly variable frame durations. We consider a traditional method of rate adaptation based on channel quality information and evaluate the throughput gain in hardware when the buffer occupancy and source packet distribution information are known. Our optimization objective is to maximize the throughput with constant transmit power since most wireless standards (e.g., 802.11, Bluetooth, ZigBee) operate in this manner. We study both cases with and without probe packets during the transmission. By evaluating the effect of diverse buffer sizes with different packet arrival distributions, both our theoretical analysis and our experimental results show that the throughput can be improved as much as 35% when the source packet distribution and buffer status information are exploited.

## Keywords

Rate adaptation Transmit buffer information Markov chain SNR FPGA Implementation## 1 Introduction

Rate adaptation is widely used to increase spectrum efficiency in time-varying wireless channels. Packet loss/success-based rate adaptation protocols have been well studied and widely implemented in the past decade[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. This kind of protocol uses packet loss/success statistics to select the perceived best rate to transmit data packets. However, packet-level information is coarse-grained and usually takes tens of transmissions to get a reasonable estimate of the channel quality. As a result, the performance of loss-based rate adaptation protocols is known to degrade as the Doppler shift increases. To enable rate adaptation with high mobility, a variety of SNR-based rate adaptation protocols have been developed that can adapt to fast-fading channels[6, 7, 8, 9]. However, the SNR is not always an accurate indicator of packet error rate (PER) for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems in frequency-selective channels. To address this problem, soft information from SISO (soft-in soft-out) decoders has been used to determine the best rate, which has a much better performance in multi-path channels[8]. Additional improvements have come from a novel effective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) metric for rate adaptation, achieving better performance than protocols that are solely based on SNR[9]. These SNR-based schemes have yet to be widely used in commercial systems.

Traditional rate adaptation protocols usually assume a fully backlogged transmit buffer. However, in real hardware, the buffer depth is always finite and the buffer occupancy is time-varying. The packet loss in a system without retransmissions results from either packet overflow at the transmit buffer, receive buffer, or packet corruption in the channel. Note that the wired network connected to the receiver usually has a much higher capacity than the wireless channel, which could prevent packet overflow at the receive buffer. Consequently, using both transmit buffer information and channel information for rate adaptation may achieve superior performance[10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. These works use either statistical or instantaneous information of the buffer occupancy and channel quality to adaptively change the transmission rate, which allows significant performance gain. However, all of these works aforementioned leverage simulation to illustrate the importance of buffer status information without implementation in hardware, which may lead to a less accurate evaluation of the system’s complexity and channel activity. Moreover, each work assumes a constant frame duration, within which various packet numbers and/or sizes are sent for different rates to equalize the frame duration. Since the packet arrival probability and channel state transition probability during one frame highly depend on the frame duration, in these constant-frame-duration systems, both the packet arrival probability and the channel state transition probability are much simpler than variable-frame-duration system. For HSPA (high-speed packet access) and DO (data optimized) systems in 3G networks, transmit buffer information and channel quality information of the users are jointly used for user scheduling by the base station[15, 16]. However, to the best of our effort, no publication was found considering buffer status information for rate adaptation in HSPA and DO systems. We acknowledge that proprietary buffer-assisted rate adaptation for HSPA could exist and be in operation in commercial devices. However, we are unable to implement and/or directly compare rate decisions of such schemes to our own.

In reality, many protocols use variable frame durations (e.g., IEEE 802.11, HIPERLAN/2, IEEE 802.15.3, ZigBee, and IEEE 802.16), which have been widely used in commercial applications. In these systems, only one packet is transmitted in each frame slot with a given packet size according to the application. As a result, the frame duration in these protocols varies for different packet sizes and transmission rates. In this system model, the channel state transition probability varies with different frame slot durations, and the frame slot duration depends on the buffer status. The packet arrival probability is also a variable for different frame slots. The variable channel state transition probability and variable packet arrival probability are essentially different from the existing constant-frame-duration systems. Therefore, we are not able to apply the optimization model of constant-frame-duration systems to variable-frame-duration systems. We will discuss such a variable-frame-duration mechanism based on the IEEE 802.11 PHY standard in this paper, and the method and result described can be directly applied to other variable-frame-duration systems. Moreover, for many devices and low-cost transceivers, packet-level power adaptation is not available. Thus, we only discuss rate adaptation with constant transmit power in this work.

In this paper, we optimize rate adaptation strategies with either statistical or instantaneous buffer information. For statistical buffer information, we use knowledge of offered load distribution, buffer size, and fading channel model, and leverage a steady-state analysis of a joint buffer and channel quality Markov chain to obtain the optimal set of rate adaptation thresholds. For instantaneous buffer information, we use the instantaneous occupancy information and offered load information and derive the packet loss rate (including both packet overflow at the transmit buffer and packet corruption in the channel) for each rate to obtain the optimal rate adaptation threshold set for each buffer status. Then, before selecting the transmit rate, the transmitter first selects the threshold set according to the instantaneous buffer status and decides the optimal rate based on the instantaneous channel gain and selected threshold set.

- 1.
We formulate and analyze a cross-layer rate adaptation system with variable frame durations, which is the prevalent scenario in commercial wireless networks.

- 2.
We provide solutions for rate adaptation with the knowledge of either statistical buffer information or instantaneous buffer information. Furthermore, we also analyze systems either with or without packets which probe the channel quality, in combination with either statistical or instantaneous buffer status. We achieve as much as 7% throughput improvement in cases with probe packets, and a much larger improvement of 35% in cases without probe packets.

- 3.
We use Matlab to obtain one set of optimal thresholds based on our proposed model and use real hardware experiments to achieve another set of optimal thresholds empirically. We show that both sets of thresholds converge to nearly identical thresholds for rate adaptation in the same scenario.

- 4.
We experimentally evaluate the throughput performance and empirically verify the theoretical analysis on a diverse set of wireless channels. With buffer status information, we show the throughput improvement as much as 35% compared to systems without buffer status information.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents a system model based on the IEEE 802.11 PHY standard and theoretically analyzes the methodology to choose the rate adaptation thresholds to optimize the throughput. The methodology for both statistical and instantaneous buffer information is provided. The experimental evaluation system settings are introduced in Section 3. Compared to purely link-layer rate adaptation systems, we experimentally show that far better performance can be achieved by considering either statistical or instantaneous buffer information in Sections 4 and 5, respectively. Related work is presented in Section 6. Finally, in Section 7, some concluding remarks and suggestions for future research are presented.

## 2 System model

In this paper, we use a constant transmission power, although there are several works that consider power adaptation[12, 17, 18]. Our results are applicable in the low-cost transmitters that usually use the default power settings and do not change the transmit power at a packet level.

### 2.1 Dynamic transmit rate

*L*bytes. In the data symbols, there are 16-b service data and six convolutional code tail bits. Let

*R*

_{ n }denote the number of data bits that can be transmitted in one OFDM symbol at rate

*n*, as shown in Table1[19]. The transmitter sends one packet every frame slot. The packet length could be from 1 to 2,047 B. The number of symbols in a frame is

**Transmission rate parameters for IEEE 802.11 a/g systems**

Rate index | Constellation | Code rate | |
---|---|---|---|

0 | BPSK | 1/2 | 24 |

1 | BPSK | 3/4 | 36 |

2 | QPSK | 1/2 | 48 |

3 | QPSK | 3/4 | 72 |

4 | 16QAM | 1/2 | 96 |

5 | 16QAM | 3/4 | 144 |

6 | 64QAM | 2/3 | 192 |

7 | 64QAM | 3/4 | 216 |

*T*

_{s}denote the duration of one OFDM symbol. In this paper, we assume a constant payload size. Moreover, if there are no packets in the buffer, the transmitter may still send probe frames that only include the preamble and header symbol to enable the receiver to continue to measure the channel quality. The frame slot duration,

*T*

_{f}, is

where *T*_{d} is a fixed-time delay including demodulation, decoding, and feedback. The number of packets in the buffer equals *m*.

*γ*, for rate

*n*is denoted by PER

_{ n }(

*γ*). Since it is challenging to get a closed form expression of PER

_{ n }in a coded system, we use the following approximation from[14] to denote the PER as

*a*

_{ n }and

*g*

_{ n }are the parameters to describe PER for rate

*n*, and

*γ*is the SNR value. The parameters for packet length

*L*= 1,024 B are shown in Table2.

**PER approximation parameters for each rate in our system model**

Rate | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1.2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 6 |

| 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2 | 2.8 | 7 | 20 | 50 |

### 2.2 Diverse offered load

*λ*packets per second. In one time interval

*t*, the probability of

*k*packets arriving,

*p*

_{ K }(

*K*=

*k*|

*t*), is given by[21]

*n*, if there are

*m*packets in the buffer, the probability of

*k*packets arriving,

*p*

_{ K }(

*K*=

*k*|

*m*,

*n*), is given by

### 2.3 Dynamic channel quality

*γ*denote the received SNR. The distribution of

*γ*can be expressed as[22]

where$\stackrel{\u0304}{\gamma}$ is the expected value of SNR.

We divide the whole SNR region into *N* non-overlapping regions. The number of feasible rates in which packets can be transmitted is also *N*. We define the thresholds as *γ*_{0} = 0 < *γ*_{1}⋯ < *γ*_{ N } = *∞*. If the instantaneous SNR falls into the region between *γ*_{ n } and *γ*_{n+1}, we say the channel is in state *n* and we use rate *n* to transmit.

*γ*

_{ n },

*γ*

_{n+1}). We can calculate${p}_{{\gamma}_{n}}$ using (6) as

*C*

_{ i }denote the channel state in the

*i*th frame slot with a duration

*T*. The channel keeps the current state or changes to the adjacent states according to the following crossover probability (as in[23, 24]), which is suitable for slow-fading wireless channels.

*N*

_{ n }is the level-cross-rate of the fading channel, denoted as[24]

where the Doppler shift *f*_{d} = *v*^{′}/*λ*^{′} represents the ratio of the relative velocity between the transmitter and the receiver and the carrier wavelength.

*f*

_{d}≪

*T*

_{f}(

*m*,

*n*)

^{-1}, for any

*m*,

*n*.

### 2.4 Rate adaptation with statistical buffer information

In this section, we investigate the offered load distribution, buffer size, and fading channel model. To do so, we leverage a steady-state analysis of a joint buffer and channel quality Markov chain to get the optimal rate adaptation thresholds and apply this threshold set for rate adaptation. We model the buffer state transition as a queue service process. If we assume that the buffer is able to accommodate *M* packets, the buffer state *B*_{ i } ∈ {0,1,...,*M*}. We assume (*B*_{ i },*C*_{ i }) is the joint buffer and channel state. We then define a transition matrix *P*, as in (12), where the element *p*_{(m,n) → (s,t)} denotes *p*(*B*_{i+1} = *s*,*C*_{i+1} = *t*|*B*_{ i } = *m*,*C*_{ i } = *n*), the transition probability from state (*B*_{ i } = *m*,*C*_{ i } = *n*) to state (*B*_{i+1} = *s*,*C*_{i+1} = *t*).

*π*

_{i,j}denote the probability of buffer state

*i*and channel state

*j*and define the row vector

*π*as

*p*(

*B*

_{i+1}=

*s*|

*B*

_{ i }=

*m*,

*C*

_{ i }=

*n*). If the buffer is empty, the next state can be any state from 0 to

*M*, and the buffer state transition only depends on the packet arrival process, as described by (5). If the incoming packets exceed M, all subsequent packets will be dropped due to overflow. However, if there is at least one packet in the buffer, there will be one packet transmitted when a new transmission starts. As a result, the next state can be any state from

*m*- 1 to

*M*. Since the system can transmit at most one data packet in one frame, there is a constraint of

*s*-

*m*≥ -1. The transition probability of the buffer states is:

*N*- 1, it can go to state

*N*- 2 or stay in the current state. For the simplicity of the model, we assume that the channel can only stay in the current state or change to the adjacent states in other cases. We have the following transition probability:

*v*is the available packet space in the buffer and can be described as

*p*

_{f}(

*n*) is the average PER of the transmission in channel state

*n*, which can be expressed as

*q*

_{m,n}is the average number of slots in state (

*m*,

*n*) per second. When the buffer is empty, we only send probe packets. As a result, there is only the packet overflow probability without packet corruption in the channel. In other states, packets suffer from both buffer overflow and channel corruption.

*γ*

_{1},…,

*γ*

_{N-1}to minimize the total packet loss:

This problem can be solved using any numerical optimization tools. In our research, we rely on Matlab to achieve the best threshold set for rate adaptation by the following methods: (i) We first sample the SNR with a step of 3 dB within the measured SNR range. (ii) We exhaustively take each combination of the SNR samples as the rate adaptation threshold and calculate the packet loss rate to obtain the optimal set of thresholds. (iii) The threshold search window is narrowed down to 6 dB (a range of 6 dB around the coarse-grained optimal threshold obtained in step ii as the center, based on the fact that the packet loss rate is a convex function of SNR). Then, we apply a finer-grained step (e.g. 1 dB) to the optimal threshold searching window obtained in step iii. We repeat this process till we achieve the expected SNR resolution for the thresholds.

Moreover, similar to the Matlab method, we also empirically search the corresponding threshold set for rate adaptation on an FPGA-based platform with repeatable controlled channel. The difference between the two methods is that in Matlab, we apply the Markov model to calculate the packet loss rate. In hardware experiments, we directly measure the throughput to determine the optimal threshold. However, we show that the results from the two methods converge.

### 2.5 Rate adaptation with instantaneous buffer information

*n*, the packet loss rate,${P}_{\text{loss}}^{n}$, is expressed as follows:

Here, the first term is the packet overflow at the buffer, and the second term accounts for the packet corruption over the channel.

*γ*, the packet loss rate,

*P*

_{loss}, is expressed as

*γ*

_{1},…,

*γ*

_{N-1}to minimize the total packet loss:

*v*, we obtain a set of

*γ*

_{1}to

*γ*

_{N-1}. As a result, we achieve a two-dimensional threshold matrix

*γ*

_{v,n}for the transmitter to decide which rate to use with the given channel gain and buffer status.

## 3 Experiment settings

The FPGA-based platform we use for our experimental evaluation is the Wireless Open-Access Research Platform (WARP). WARP is a useful wireless communication system supporting a fully customized cross-layer design[13]. WARP is used by a number of academic and industrial research labs for protocol implementation. Mainly, the physical layer implementation is in the FPGA logic fabric, and the higher layers exist as code on an embedded PowerPC.

In contrast to the commonly used reference design for WARP, which heavily leverages Xilinx System Generator (Xilinx, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) for the physical layer implementation, we use Verilog HDL to design and implement a full OFDM transceiver according to the IEEE 802.11g standard. Systems designed with Verilog can be simulated and processed using most of the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software and can be transplanted across most digital devices and platforms. The design operates in real time, transmitting and receiving wide band signals. Per the 802.11g standard, we use OFDM as the underlying modulation technique for our physical layer design. We implement complete real-time signal processing, synchronization, and control systems in the fabric of the FPGA on WARP. Many of the functional blocks in both the transmitter and the receiver are common to any OFDM implementation. These blocks include FEC encoding, digital modulation, IFFT, and output filtering in the transmitter and input filtering, FFT, channel estimation, equalization, digital demodulation, and FEC decoding in the receiver[19, 25].

In our evaluation, we set the packet length *L* = 1,024 B. Note that it is easy to find the optimal parameters for other packet lengths by following the process in Section 2. In order to cover all the SNR regions for all 8 rates, we set up a Rayleigh fading channel with an average SNR$\stackrel{\u0304}{\gamma}=15$ dB and a Doppler frequency of 10 Hz. We generate the distribution of a packet source according to Poisson random process with three different average packet rates, *λ* ∈ {244,977,3906} packets per second, corresponding to {2.0,8.0,32.0} Mbps, respectively. For easy illustration, in the analytical model, we set the buffer size to 2 and 8 packets (2,048 and 8,192 B), respectively, to examine the effect of different buffer sizes. In order to show the practical impact of this work, we also experimentally evaluated a normal buffer size of 256 packets (2 Mb) and showed the results. For a given offered load and rate adaptation scheme, we define the *throughput efficiency* as the throughput with a certain threshold normalized by the throughput with the optimal threshold.

## 4 Experimental results with statistical buffer information

In this section, we show how the statistical buffer information and offered load distribution affect the rate adaptation strategy and the resulting throughput.

### 4.1 Experimental evaluation of rate adaptation with probe packets

In this section, we evaluate the system performance when probe packets are used. The transmitter keeps sending probe packets when there are no data packets in the buffer. Probe packets can provide more accurate and updated channel status information but induce additional overhead into the system.

#### 4.1.1 Effect of diverse offered load

**The 8-rate adaptation thresholds**

Offered load | Buf. size (byte) | Adaptation threshold (dB) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | ||

2 Mbps | 2,048 | 10.0(9.8) | 11.0(11.0) | 12.0(12.8) | 14.0(15.0) | 18.0(18.2) | 20.0(21.2) | 22.5(22.2) |

8,192 | 11.0(10.4) | 12.0(11.8) | 14.5(13.6) | 15.0(14.2) | 19.0(18.2) | 22.0(21.4) | 23.0(22.4) | |

8 Mbps | 2,048 | 6.0(5.8) | 8.0(8.0) | 10.0(9.2) | 13.0(12.6) | 16.0(14.8) | 20(19.4) | 22.5(21.2) |

8,192 | 6.5(6.2) | 9.0(8.4) | 11.0(10.0) | 14.0(13.2) | 17.0(16.4) | 22.0(20.2) | 23.0(21.6) | |

32 Mbps | 2,048 | 4.0(4.4) | 5.5(5.4) | 8.0(7.6) | 11.5(10.8) | 14.5(13.6) | 19.0(18.4) | 22.5(21.8) |

8,192 | 4.5(4.4) | 6.0(5.6) | 8.5(8.0) | 12.0(11.4) | 15.0(14.0) | 19.5(18.8) | 23.0(22.2) | |

No buf./load info. | 4.0(4.2) | 5.3(5.2) | 8.0(7.8) | 11.2(10.8) | 14.6(13.8) | 19.3(18.6) | 22.7(21.4) |

**The 4-rate adaptation thresholds (between rates 0, 2, 4, and 6)**

Offered load | Buffer size (bytes) | Adaptation threshold (dB) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|

| | | ||

2 Mbps | 2,048 | 10.0(9.2) | 15.0(14.6) | 19.0(17.8) |

8,192 | 12.0(10.8) | 14.5(14.4) | 20.0(18.2) | |

8 Mbps | 2,048 | 6.5(6.2) | 12.5(11.4) | 19.0(17.8) |

8,192 | 7.5(7.0) | 13.5(12.8) | 20.5(17.6) | |

32 Mbps | 2,048 | 5.0(5.0) | 10.0(9.8) | 18.5(16.8) |

8,192 | 5.0(5.2) | 11.0(10.4) | 19.0(17.2) | |

No buffer/load information | 4.7(4.6) | 10.5(10.0) | 18.6(16.6) |

**The 2-rate adaptation thresholds (between rate 0 and rate 4)**

Offered load | Buffer size (bytes) | Adaptation threshold (dB) |
---|---|---|

| ||

2 Mbps | 2,048 | 12.5(12.2) |

8,192 | 14.0(13.6) | |

8 Mbps | 2,048 | 11.5(11.2) |

8,192 | 12.0(11.8) | |

32 Mbps | 2,048 | 10.0(9.6) |

8,192 | 10.5(10.0) | |

No buffer/load information | 10.0(9.8) |

#### 4.1.2 Effect of diverse buffer size

#### 4.1.3 Performance evaluation

### 4.2 Experimental evaluation of rate adaptation without probe packets

Although probe packets can provide more accurate and updated channel status information for the transmitter to select the proper transmit rate, it costs more energy and time resources compared to the case without probe packets. In this section, we evaluate the system performance, when the transmitter remains idle when there are no packets in the buffer, and compare it with the system with probe packets.

## 5 Experimental results with instantaneous buffer information

## 6 Related work

Dynamic resource allocation (e.g., transmit power and transmit rate) has been shown to be an effective solution to improve system performance in wireless networks[26, 27]. Rate adaptation has been studied using loss-based and channel-quality-based mechanisms. The problem of combining finite buffer and rate adaptation has also been addressed in several papers. In[10], the authors considered a constant-frame-duration system in which the number of packets transmitted during one PHY frame is different for different transmission rates. Moreover, the authors formulated the system based on a Markov chain to reduce the packet loss rate. In[11], the authors analyzed the buffer-assisted rate adaptation problem with the constraint of a constant total power consumption. The authors found that in a correlated fading channel, the structure of the optimal buffer and channel adaptive transmission policies can be in sharp contrast to the water-filling strategy. The author of[12] also discussed rate adaptation with transmit buffer information in the system with partial channel information at the transmitter along with no transmitter buffer information, statistical transmit buffer information, and instantaneous transmit buffer information at the receiver, respectively. All the works above aim to maximize the total throughput with the constraint of a maximum average transmit power, which tends to add more delay to save power.

In[14], the authors relaxed the maximum average transmit power constraint and generally analyzed the procedure of buffer-assisted rate adaptation in a constant-frame-duration system, studying the packet loss rate. The complexity of this algorithm is low. However, this method cannot guarantee optimal levels of throughput. Moreover, they did not consider the idle time when there are no packets in the buffer. In contrast to that algorithm, we consider and analyze a variable-frame-duration system and jointly consider every threshold to directly find the set of thresholds to get the optimal throughput[28].

## 7 Conclusion

In this paper, we analyzed buffer-assisted packet transmission based on the IEEE 802.11a/g physical layer standard. Different from prior work, we used a variable-frame-duration model, which is practical for IEEE 802.11-related communication systems and many other systems as mentioned in Section 1. Our objective is to maximize the system throughput, with a constant transmit power. We proposed the process to calculate the rate adaptation thresholds with the knowledge of either statistical or instantaneous buffer information. We experimentally evaluated the theoretical optimal rate adaptation thresholds for systems with and without probe packets. We showed substantial improvement with the consideration of offered load distribution and buffer information in the system.

In future work, extension to variable packet length and multi-user scenarios could be considered. For multi-user rate adaptation, the optimization objective will be maximizing the throughput of the entire network, which requires a different strategy compared to the single-user system. Moreover, evaluation of both power and rate adaptation is challenging but important for mobile devices in the future.

## Notes

## Supplementary material

## References

- 1.Bicket JC: Bit-rate selection in wireless networks. MS Thesis, MIT,. 2005.Google Scholar
- 2.Wong S, Lu S, Yang H, Bharghavan V: Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks. In
*Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom ‘06)*. Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2006:146-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Lacage M, Hossein M, Turletti T: IEEE 802.11 rate adaptation: a practical approach Master’s Thesis,. 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.Kamerman A, Monteban L: WaveLAN II: a high-performance wireless LAN for the unlicensed band.
*Bell Labs Techn. J*1997, 118-133.Google Scholar - 5.Kim J, Kim S, Choi S, Qiao D: CARA: collision-aware rate adaptation for IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In
*Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2006)*. Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain; 2006:1-11.Google Scholar - 6.Sadeghi B, Kanodia V, Sabharwal A, Knightly E: Opportunistic media access for multirate ad hoc networks. In
*Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Network (MobiCom ‘02)*. Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2002:24-35.Google Scholar - 7.Holland G, Vaidya N, Bahl P: A rate-adaptive MAC protocol for multi-hop wireless networks,. In
*Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Network (MobiCom ‘01)*. Rome, Italy; 2001:236-251.Google Scholar - 8.Vutukuru M, Balakrishnan H, Jamieson K: Cross-layer wireless bit rate adaptation.
*SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev*2009, 39(4):3-14. 10.1145/1594977.1592571CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Halperin D, Hu W, Sheth A, Wetherall D: Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements.
*SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev*2010., 41(4):Google Scholar - 10.Yang H-C, Sasankan S: Analysis of channel-adaptive packet transmission over fading channels with transmit buffer management.
*IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech*2008, 57(1):404-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Hoang AT, Motani M: Cross-layer adaptive transmission: optimal strategies in fading channels.
*IEEE Trans. Comm*2008, 56(5):799-807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Rajan D: Exploiting transmit buffer information at the receiver in block-fading channels.
*EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process*2009, 2009: 235-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Camp J, Knightly E: Modulation rate adaptation in urban and vehicular environments Cross-layer implementation and experimental evaluation.
*IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw*2010, 18(6):1949-1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.Liu Q, Zhou S, Giannakis GB: Queuing with adaptive modulation and coding over wireless links: cross-layer analysis and design.
*IEEE Trans. Wireless Comm*2005, 4(3):1142-1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Tapia JP, Liu J, Karimli Y, Feuerstein M:
*HSPA Performance and Evolution: A Practical Perspective, 1st edn*. USA: Wiley; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.HSPA (03/04/2014) http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/99-hspa
- 17.Goldsmith AJ, Chua S-G: Variable-rate variable-power MQAM for fading channels.
*IEEE Trans. Comm*1997, 45(10):1218-1230. 10.1109/26.634685CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Goldsmith AJ, Chua S-G: Adaptive coded modulation for fading channels.
*IEEE Trans. Comm*1998, 46(5):595-602. 10.1109/26.668727CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.IEEE 802.11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE-SA. 12 Jun 2007Google Scholar
- 20.Karagiannis T, Molle M, Faloutsos M, Broido A: A nonstationary Poisson view of internet traffic. In
*Proceedings of the twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2004)*. Hong Kong; 2004:1558-1569.Google Scholar - 21.Leon-Garcia A:
*Probability and Random Process for Electrical Engineering, 2nd edn*. Addison-Wesley; 1994.Google Scholar - 22.Stuber GL:
*Principles of Mobile Communications, 2nd edn*. Norwell: Kluwer; 2000.Google Scholar - 23.Wang HS, Moayeri N: Finite-state Markov channel-a useful model for radio communication channels.
*IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech*1995, 44(1):163-171. 10.1109/25.350282CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Razavilar J, Liu KJR, Marcus SI: Jointly optimized bit-rate/delay control policy for wireless packet networks with fading channels.
*IEEE Trans. Comm*2002, 50(3):484-494. 10.1109/26.990910CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Murphy PO: Design, implementation and characterization of a cooperative communications system. PhD Thesis, Rice University,. 2010.Google Scholar
- 26.Lopez-Perez D, Chu X, Vasilakos AV, Claussen H: On distributed and coordinated resource allocation for interference mitigation in self-organizing LTE networks.
*IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw*2013, 21(4):1145-1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.Lopez-Perez D, Chu X, Vasilakos AV, Claussen H: Power minimization based resource allocation for interference mitigation in OFDMA femtocell networks.
*IEEE J. Sel. Area Comm*2014, 32(2):333-344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.Du Y, Rajan D, Camp J: Analysis and experimental evaluation of rate adaptation with transmit buffer information. In
*Proceedings of the 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC 2013)*. Cagliary, Sardinia, Italy; 2013:194-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.