Peer review reports
From: A critical re-evaluation of the regression model specification in the US D1 EQ-5D value function
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Norman |
9 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Oppe |
21 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
29 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Norman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
11 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kim Rand-Hendriksen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1478-7954-10-2 |