Peer review reports
From: Concordance and robustness of quality indicator sets for hospitals: an analysis of routine data
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Gilthorpe |
11 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd |
12 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - john wright |
15 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gary McLean |
10 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd |
5 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Ghali |
5 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
15 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
15 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
18 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-106 |