Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rik Crutzen |
22 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Balazs |
6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donata Woitas-Slubowska |
7 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Teye Doku |
16 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edit Paulik |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edit Paulik |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rik Crutzen |
21 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Balazs |
1 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Teye Doku |
3 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donata Woitas-Slubowska |
3 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Edit Paulik |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
17 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Edit Paulik |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
17 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
20 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-60 |