Peer review reports
From: Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donna Stroup |
17 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting |
26 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donna Stroup |
6 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting |
31 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting |
9 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
25 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting |
11 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
11 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
19 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Whiting |
30 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
30 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
11 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
11 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
12 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Beverley Shea |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
12 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
13 Jun 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jun 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-27 |