Peer review reports
From: Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
15 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
16 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
6 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Morris |
28 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
9 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Thomas |
28 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
25 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Zachary Munn |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
25 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
10 Sep 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108 |