Background
The effectiveness and accuracy of aligning short reads to genomes have an important impact on many applications that rely on next-generation sequencing data. The computational requirements and material cost for aligning large-scale short reads to genomes is also expensive. To prevent wasted time and resources for aligning short reads, we investigated the different measures of genome complexity[1] that correlated best to the performance of alignment to propose a linear model for each aligning method[2].
Materials and methods
We demonstrated that repeats in genomic DNA could affect greatly the performance of short-read aligners. Exploring several different measures of genome complexity, we showed that there was a high correlation between our proposed-measure of genome complexity and, respectively, alignment accuracy and chromosomal coverage. The result was validated using 9 state-of-the-art aligners (Bowtie2[3], BWA-SW[4], Cushaw2, Masai[5], mrFast, SeqAlto, SHRiMP2[6], Smalt, and SOAP2[7]) and two different data sets. The first dataset, which consists of 100 genomic sequences including bacteria, plants and eukaryotes, was used to correlate complexity and alignment accuracy. The second dataset, which consisted of all 24 chromosomes of human, 20 chromosomes of soybean, and 10 chromosomes of corn, was used to correlate complexity and chromosomal coverage. High correlation between alignment performance and complexity enabled us to build linear regression models that could predict alignment accuracy and chromosomal coverage.
Results
We demonstrated the utility of this method by showing how to use linear models to predict accuracy of aligners simply based on the complexity of genomes without using any reads for alignment. This can potentially help reduce experimental costs. Further, we showed how to use linear models to predict chromosomal coverage of genomes based on the expected coverage. This ability can also help reduce experimental costs as it allows researchers to predict how much a given number of reads will effectively cover chromosomes of interest. A visualization of genome complexity along chromosomes will also help to visually identify chromosomal regions that are potentially difficult to be covered by reads.
Availability
Software to compute measures of genome complexity is available at https://github.com/vtphan/shortread-alignment-prediction
References
Lynch M, Conery JS: The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003, 302: 1401-1404. 10.1126/science.1089370.
Kärkkäinen J, Sanders P, Burkhardt S: Linear work suffix array construction. Journal of the ACM (JACM). 2006, 53: 918-936. 10.1145/1217856.1217858.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL: Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012, 9: 357-359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923.
Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 589-595. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698.
Siragusa E, Weese D, Reinert K: Fast and accurate read mapping with approximate seeds and multiple backtracking. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013, 41: e78-e78. 10.1093/nar/gkt005.
David M, et al: SHRiMP2: sensitive yet practical short read mapping. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 1011-1012. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr046.
Li R, et al: SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24: 713-714. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025.
Acknowledgements
This work is partly supported by the National Science Foundation [CCF-1320297 to V.P.]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Tran, Q., Gao, S., Vo, N.S. et al. A linear model for predicting performance of short-read aligners using genome complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 16 (Suppl 15), P17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S15-P17
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S15-P17