1 Introduction

Let U={z:|z|<1} be the unit disk in the complex plane ℂ, and let B denote the set of bounded analytic functions a satisfying |a(z)|<1 in U. Also let B 0 denote its subclass consisting of aB with a(0)=0. A logharmonic mapping f defined in U is a solution of the nonlinear elliptic partial differential equation

f z ¯ ¯ f ¯ =a f z f ,

where the second dilatation function a lies in B. Thus the Jacobian

J f =| f z | 2 ( 1 | a | 2 )

is positive, and all non-constant logharmonic mappings are therefore sense-preserving and open in U. If f is a non-constant logharmonic mapping that vanishes only at z=0, then f admits the representation

f(z)= z m | z | 2 β m h(z) g ( z ) ¯ ,
(1)

where m is a nonnegative integer, Reβ>1/2, while h and g are analytic functions in U satisfying g(0)=1 and h(0)0 (see [1]). The exponent β in (1) depends only on a(0) and is given by

β= a ( 0 ) ¯ 1 + a ( 0 ) 1 | a ( 0 ) | 2 .

Note that f(0)0 if and only if m=0, and that a univalent logharmonic mapping in U vanishes at the origin if and only if m=1, that is, f has the form

f(z)=z | z | 2 β h(z) g ( z ) ¯ ,

where Reβ>1/2 and 0(hg)(U). This class has been studied extensively in recent years, for instance, in [18], and [9].

In this case, F(ζ)=logf( e ζ ) is a univalent harmonic mapping of the half-plane {ζ:Re(ζ)<0}. Studies on univalent harmonic mappings can be found in [1016], and [17]. Such mappings are closely related to the theory of minimal surfaces [18, 19].

In this work, emphasis is given on univalent and sense-preserving logharmonic mappings in U with respect to a B 0 . These mappings are of the form

f(z)=zh(z) g ( z ) ¯ ,
(2)

and the class consisting of such mappings is denoted by S L h . Also let S L h denote its subclass of univalent starlike logharmonic mappings. The classical family S of univalent analytic starlike functions is evidently a subclass of S L h . The representation in (2) is essential to the present work as it allows the treatment of logharmonic mappings f through their associated analytic representations h and g (see [35], and [6]). For example, Abdulhadi and Abu Muhanna [5] established a connection between starlike logharmonic mappings of order α and starlike analytic functions of order α.

It follows from (2) that the functions h, g and the dilatation a satisfy

z g ( z ) g ( z ) =a(z) ( 1 + z h ( z ) h ( z ) ) .
(3)

Given an analytic function φ with a specified geometric property and a B 0 , a common method to construct a logharmonic mapping f(z)=zh(z) g ( z ) ¯ is to solve for h and g via the equations

z h ( z ) g ( z ) =φ(z)and z g ( z ) g ( z ) 1 + z h ( z ) h ( z ) =a(z).

Thus the solution is f(z)=zh(z) g ( z ) ¯ with

g(z)=exp 0 z a ( s ) 1 a ( s ) φ ( s ) φ ( s ) dsandh(z)= φ ( z ) g ( z ) z .

In this paper, a new logharmonic mapping with a specified property is constructed by taking product combination of two functions possessing the given property. Specifically, if f 1 (z)=z h 1 (z) g 1 ( z ) ¯ with respect to a 1 B 0 , and f 2 (z)=z h 2 (z) g 2 ( z ) ¯ with respect to a 2 B 0 , we construct a new univalent logharmonic mapping F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, with respect to μ B 0 . Sufficient conditions are obtained on f 1 and f 2 for the product combination F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z) to be starlike. We close the work by giving several examples of univalent starlike logharmonic mappings constructed from this product.

2 Product of logharmonic mappings

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in ℂ containing the origin. Then Ω is said to be α-spirallike, π/2<α<π/2, if wexp(t e i α )Ω for all t0 whenever wΩ. Evidently, Ω is starlike (with respect to the origin) if α=0.

The following result from [6] will be needed in the sequel.

Lemma 1 Let f(z)=zh(z) g ( z ) ¯ be logharmonic in U with 0hg(U). Then f S L h if and only if φ(z)=zh(z)/g(z) S .

Theorem 1 Let f(z)=zh(z) g ( z ) ¯ S L h with respect to a B 0 , and let γ be a constant with Reγ>1/2. Then F(z)=f(z) | f ( z ) | 2 γ is an α-spirallike logharmonic mapping with respect to

a ˆ (z)= 1 + γ ¯ 1 + γ a ( z ) + γ ¯ 1 + γ ¯ 1 + a ( z ) γ 1 + γ = ( 1 + γ ¯ ) a ( z ) + γ ¯ 1 + γ + γ a ( z ) ,

where α= tan 1 (2Imγ/(1+2Reγ)).

Proof The function F=f | f | 2 γ = f 1 + γ f ¯ γ is logharmonic with respect to a ˆ =( F z ¯ ¯ / F ¯ )/( F z /F). Indeed,

a ˆ ( z ) = ( 1 + γ ¯ ) a ( z ) f z f + γ ¯ ( f ¯ z ¯ f ¯ ) ¯ ( 1 + γ ) f z f + γ f z ¯ ¯ f ¯ = ( 1 + γ ¯ ) a ( z ) f z f + γ ¯ f z f ( 1 + γ ) f z f + γ a ( z ) f z f = 1 + γ ¯ 1 + γ a ( z ) + γ ¯ 1 + γ ¯ 1 + a ( z ) γ 1 + γ .

Thus

| a ˆ (z)|=| a ( z ) + γ ¯ 1 + γ ¯ 1 + a ( z ) γ 1 + γ |<1

provided | γ | 2 < | 1 + γ | 2 , which evidently holds since Reγ>1/2.

Also F=f | f | 2 γ = f 1 + γ f ¯ γ =z | z | 2 γ h 1 + γ g γ h γ ¯ g 1 + γ ¯ ¯ . Let H= h 1 + γ g γ , G= h γ ¯ g 1 + γ ¯ , and ψ(z)=zH(z)/G ( z ) e 2 i α . Then

e i α z ψ ( z ) ψ ( z ) = e i α + ( ( 1 + γ ) e i α γ ¯ e i α ) z h ( z ) h ( z ) ( ( 1 + γ ¯ ) e i α γ e i α ) z g ( z ) g ( z ) .

The condition on α ensures that

( 1 + γ ) e i α γ ¯ e i α cos α = ( 1 + γ ¯ ) e i α γ e i α cos α =1.

Also Lemma 1 shows that φ(z)=zh(z)/g(z) S . Thus

Re ( e i α z ψ ( z ) ψ ( z ) ) =(cosα)Re ( z φ ( z ) φ ( z ) ) >0,

and it follows from [[6], Theorem 2.1] that F is α-spirallike logharmonic whose dilatation is a ˆ (z). □

Remark 1 Observe that F in Theorem 1 is starlike if and only if γ>1/2.

Theorem 2 Let f k (z)=z h k (z) g k ( z ) ¯ S L h (k=1,2) with respect to the same a B 0 . Then F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping with respect to the same a.

Proof Let μ=( F z ¯ ¯ / F ¯ )/( F z /F). It follows from (3) that

μ = λ f 1 z ¯ ¯ f 1 ¯ + ( 1 λ ) f 2 z ¯ ¯ f 2 ¯ λ f 1 z f 1 + ( 1 λ ) f 2 z f 2 = λ g 1 g 1 + ( 1 λ ) g 2 g 2 λ ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) = λ a ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) a ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) λ ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) = a .
(4)

Hence |μ(z)|<1 in U, which implies that F is a locally univalent logharmonic mapping.

Next F is shown to have the form (2). Since f 1 =z h 1 g 1 ¯ , and f 2 =z h 2 g 2 ¯ , then

F ( z ) = f 1 λ ( z ) f 2 1 λ ( z ) = ( z h 1 ( z ) g 1 ( z ) ¯ ) λ ( z h 2 ( z ) g 2 ( z ) ¯ ) 1 λ = z h 1 λ h 2 1 λ g 1 λ ( z ) g 2 1 λ ( z ) ¯ = z h ( z ) g ( z ) ¯
(5)

with h= h 1 λ h 2 1 λ and g= g 1 λ g 2 1 λ .

Since f k is starlike, that is, each φ k =z h k / g k satisfies the condition Rez φ k (z)/ φ k (z)>0 in U, direct computations show that

arg ( F ( r e i θ ) ) θ = Re ( z F z F z ¯ F z ¯ F ) = λ Re ( z f 1 z f 1 z ¯ f 1 z ¯ f 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) Re ( z f 2 z f 2 z ¯ f 2 z ¯ f 2 ) = λ Re ( z φ 1 ( z ) φ 1 ( z ) ) + ( 1 λ ) Re ( z φ 2 ( z ) φ 2 ( z ) ) > 0 .

Thus F is starlike. □

The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorem 2.

Corollary 1 Let f k (z)=z h k (z) g k ( z ) ¯ S L h (k=1,2,,n) with respect to the same a B 0 . Then F= f 1 λ 1 f 2 λ 2 f n λ n is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping with respect to the same a, where 0 λ k 1 and λ 1 + λ 2 ++ λ n =1.

Theorem 3 Let f k (z)=z h k (z) g k ( z ) ¯ S L h (k=1,2) with respect to a k B 0 . Suppose also that

Re(1 a 1 a 2 ¯ ) ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) ( ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) ) ¯ 0.

Then F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping.

Proof The argument is similar to the proof of Theorem 2. From (5), evidently F has the form (2).

Let ( F z /F)μ(z)= F z ¯ ¯ / F ¯ . Since | a k |<1, it follows from (3) and (4) that

| μ ( z ) | = | λ g 1 g 1 + ( 1 λ ) g 2 g 2 λ ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) | = | λ a 1 ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) a 2 ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) λ ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) | .
(6)

By assumption,

| λ ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) | 2 | λ a 1 ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) + ( 1 λ ) a 2 ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) | 2 = λ 2 ( 1 | a 1 | 2 ) | ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) | 2 + ( 1 λ ) 2 ( 1 | a 2 | 2 ) | ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) | 2 + 2 λ ( 1 λ ) Re ( ( 1 a 1 a 2 ¯ ) ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) ( ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) ) ¯ ) > 0 ,

whence |μ(z)|<1, which implies that F is locally univalent.

Now the associated analytic function for F is given by φ=(z h 1 λ h 2 1 λ )/( g 1 λ g 2 1 λ ). Let φ(U)=Ω. From Lemma 1, φ k =z h k / g k S , and thus

Re ( z φ ( z ) φ ( z ) ) =λRe ( z φ 1 ( z ) φ 1 ( z ) ) +(1λ)Re ( z φ 2 ( z ) φ 2 ( z ) ) >0.

Hence Ω is a starlike domain, and we deduce that F is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping. □

Theorem 4 Let f k =z h k g k ¯ S L h with respect to a k B, k=1,2, satisfying z h k g k =z. Then F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping.

Proof Since

( z h k ) ( z h k ) + g k g k = 1 z ,

it follows from (3) that

( z h k ) ( z h k ) = 1 z ( 1 + a k ) .
(7)

With F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), (6) and (7) readily yield

|μ(z)|=| λ a 1 + ( 1 λ ) a 2 + a 1 a 2 1 + ( 1 λ ) a 1 + λ a 2 |.

Evidently |μ(z)|<1 is equivalent to ψ(λ)=|1+(1λ) a 1 +λ a 2 | 2 |λ a 1 +(1λ) a 2 + a 1 a 2 | 2 >0.

Now

ψ ( λ ) = 2 λ ( ( 1 | a 1 | 2 ) Re a 2 ( 1 | a 2 | 2 ) Re a 1 ( | a 1 | 2 | a 2 | 2 ) ) + ( 1 | a 2 | 2 ) | 1 + a 1 | 2

is a continuous monotonic function of λ in the interval [0,1]. Since

ψ(0)= ( 1 | a 2 | 2 ) |1+ a 1 | 2 >0

and

ψ(1)= ( 1 | a 1 | 2 ) |1+ a 2 | 2 >0,

we deduce that ψ(λ)>0 for all λ[0,1], and thus F is locally univalent.

With φ k =z h k / g k , then

Re ( z φ k ( z ) φ k ( z ) ) =Re ( ( 1 a k ) z ( z h k ) ( z h k ) ) =Re ( 1 a k 1 + a k ) >0.

Hence φ k is starlike univalent, and from Lemma 1, f k (z)=z h k (z) g k ( z ) ¯ is starlike univalent logharmonic.

The associated analytic function for F is given by φ(z)=(z h 1 λ h 2 1 λ )/( g 1 λ g 2 1 λ ). Further

Re ( z φ ( z ) φ ( z ) ) =λRe ( z φ 1 ( z ) φ 1 ( z ) ) +(1λ)Re ( z φ 2 ( z ) φ 2 ( z ) ) >0,

and thus F is starlike. □

The proof of Theorem 4 evidently gives the following result of [[6], Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.2].

Corollary 2 Let f k =z h k g k ¯ S L h (k=1,2) with respect to a k B 0 , and suppose that z h k g k =z. Then φ(z)=z ( h k ( z ) ) 2 S .

3 Examples

We give several illustrative examples in this section.

Example 1 Let

f(z)=z ( 1 z ¯ 1 z ) .

Then f is a univalent logharmonic mapping with respect to a(z)=z, and it maps U onto U [6].

Now the function F(z)=f(z) | f ( z ) | 2 γ is an α-spirallike logharmonic mapping with respect to

a ˆ (z)= 1 + γ ¯ 1 + γ z + γ ¯ 1 + γ ¯ 1 z γ 1 + γ ,

where α= tan 1 (2Imγ/(1+2Reγ)). In particular, if γ=i, then α= tan 1 (2)=0.352π, and

a ˆ (z)= i ( 1 i ) z 1 + i i z .

The image of circles in the unit disk under f is shown in Figure 1, and Figure 2 shows the image of the radial slits in U by F.

Figure 1
figure 1

Graph of circles in U by f(z)= z ( 1 z ¯ ) 1 z .

Figure 2
figure 2

Graph of radial slits by F(z)=f(z) | f ( z ) | 2 i , f(z)= z ( 1 z ¯ ) 1 z .

Example 2 Consider the functions

f 1 (z)=z ( 1 z ¯ 1 z ) exp { Re 4 z 1 z } and f 2 (z)=z ( 1 + z ¯ 1 + z ) .

Since φ 1 (z)=z/ ( 1 z ) 2 and φ 2 (z)=z/ ( 1 + z ) 2 are starlike analytic functions, it follows from [[5], Theorem 1] that f 1 and f 2 are starlike logharmonic mappings with respect to a(z)=z. Theorem 2 shows that F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, is a starlike univalent logharmonic mapping.

The image of F is shown in Figure 3 for λ=1/3.

Figure 3
figure 3

Graph of circles in U by F(z)=z ( 1 z ¯ 1 z exp { Re 4 z 1 z } ) 1 / 3 ( 1 + z ¯ 1 + z ) 2 / 3 .

Example 3 In this example, let

f 1 (z)=z ( 1 z ¯ ) ( 1 z ) and f 2 (z)=z ( 1 z ¯ ) ( 1 z ) exp { Re 4 z 1 z } ,

and

F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z),0λ1.

Simple calculations show that f 1 and f 2 are respectively starlike logharmonic with dilatations a 1 (z)=z and a 2 (z)=z. Also F is logharmonic with respect to μ(z)=z((12λ)+z)/(1+(12λ)z).

Since

Re ( ( 1 a 1 a 2 ¯ ) ( z h 1 ) ( z h 1 ) ( ( z h 2 ) ( z h 2 ) ) ¯ ) = Re ( ( 1 + | z | 2 ) 1 z ( 1 z ) 1 + z ¯ z ¯ ( 1 z ¯ ) 2 ) = ( 1 + | z | 2 ) | z | 2 | 1 z | 2 Re 1 + z 1 z > 0 ,

the conditions of Theorem 3 are satisfied, and thus F is starlike univalent.

The image of circles in U under F for λ=1/3 is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4
figure 4

Graph of F(z)=z ( 1 z ¯ 1 z ) 1 / 3 ( 1 z ¯ 1 z exp { Re 4 z 1 z } ) 2 / 3 .

Example 4 Let f 1 (z)=z h 1 (z) g 1 ( z ) ¯ , where z h 1 (z) g 1 (z)=z, a 1 (z)=z, and

h 1 (z)= 1 1 + z , g 1 (z)=1+z.

Thus

f 1 (z)= z ( 1 + z ¯ ) ( 1 + z ) .

Further, let f 2 (z)=z h 2 (z) g 2 ( z ) ¯ , where z h 2 (z) g 2 (z)=z, a 2 (z)= z 2 , and

h 2 (z)= 1 1 + z 2 , g 2 (z)= 1 + z 2 .

In this case,

f 2 (z)= z 1 + z ¯ 2 1 + z 2 .

Since f 1 and f 2 satisfy the conditions of Theorem 4, we deduce that F(z)= f 1 λ (z) f 2 1 λ (z), 0λ1, is a univalent starlike logharmonic mapping. The image of U under F for λ=1/3 is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5
figure 5

Graph of F(z)=z ( 1 + z ¯ 1 + z ) 1 / 3 ( 1 + z ¯ 2 1 + z 2 ) 2 / 3 .