Application of plant extracts as inducers to challenge leaf rust of wheat
- 168 Downloads
Five plant extracts, i.e., henna, Lawsonia inermis; acalypha, Acalypha wilkesiana; chinaberry, Melia azedarach; pomegranate, Punica granatum; and lantana, Lantana camara, were tested as inducers to protect wheat against leaf rust infection caused by Puccinia triticina Eriks. The plant extracts were applied pre-infection on susceptible wheat cultivar "Gemmiza-7" under field conditions during two growing seasons (2016/2017 and 2017/2018). All the tested plant extracts were found to be effective against the leaf rust infection. They significantly reduced the coefficient of infection (ACI) to be ranging 7.50 to 20.00, compared to the non-treated control (ACI = 75.00). Lantana extract was the most effective one (efficiency = 88.88%), which was very close to the fungicide “diniconazole” (efficiency = 89.92%). Henna extract ranked second (80.00%), followed by chinaberry (76.00%), acalypha (72.00%), and pomegranate (68.00%). However, wheat yield components were significantly increased by all the tested treatments, especially lantana extract and the fungicide. Similarly, biochemical analyses revealed a significant increase in the plant contents of chlorophyll a and b, total phenolics, and oxidative enzymes activities (POX and PPO) at all the tested treatments. Results indicated that the tested plant extracts could induce wheat resistance to leaf rust.
KeywordsWheat leaf rust Puccinia triticina Induced resistance Plant extracts Triticum aestivum
Leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina Eriks is one of the most serious constraints in wheat production in many wheat-growing regions. In Egypt, the fungus causes a severe yield loss reached up to 50% (Abdel-Hak et al. 1980 and Draz et al. 2015). Disease management is usually based on the use of resistant cultivars (Draz et al. 2015) and application of synthetic fungicides (Barro et al. 2017). The leaf rust fungus can form new races that are capable to breakdown the plant resistance. Besides, the negative environmental impacts of fungicides are intensively increasing every day. Thus, the alternative methods for reducing fungicides’ use are being developed including plant extracts, as one of the effective methods that incorporate natural antifungal substances. Some plants contain certain components that are toxic to plant pathogens, namely, botanical pesticides or botanicals (Dubey et al. 2008). In fact, natural products have proved to be potential sources of environmentally safe antimicrobial agents, which could be useful in plant protection and plant disease control (Wang et al. 2004).
Resistance can be systemically induced in some susceptible plants by the application of certain chemical substances as well as the pre-inoculation with pathogenic or nonpathogenic microorganisms (Kuc 1982). In this subject, botanical extracts have been found to effectively control a wide range of plant pathogens through inducing a defense response in the infected plants (Chakraborty and Chakraborty 2010 and Srivastava et al. 2011). Studies on the antifungal activity of botanical extracts to protect plants from diseases have received much attention (Morsy et al. 2011 and Bhuvaneshwari et al. 2015). The mode of action of abiotic inducers against plant pathogens might occur as a secondary messenger enhancing the host defense mechanisms (Geetha and Shetty 2002), either by increasing the activity of peroxidase (POX), by the synthesis of new peroxidase isozymes (POD) isoforms, by the accumulation of the phenolic compounds (Hassan et al. 2007), or through inhibition of some antioxidant enzymes and catalases, thereby leading to the production of elevated amounts of H2O2 (Radwan et al. 2008). In addition, abiotic inducers also enhance resistance through direct effects on the development and survival of the pathogens or indirect effects on plant metabolism with subsequent effects on the pathogen-food supply (Khan et al. 2003).
The aim of this study was to investigate the prior applications of some plant extracts for inducing resistance of wheat against leaf rust caused by P. triticina under field conditions.
Materials and methods
Plant extracts of five plant species, including leaves of henna (Lowsonia inermis), acalypha (Acalypha wilkesiana), chinaberry (Melia azedarach), and lantana (Lantana camara) and fruit peel of pomegranate (Punica granatum) were tested to determine their efficiency as inducer materials to resist leaf rust infection of wheat under Egyptian field conditions. Fresh and healthy leaves of lantana, acalypha, and chinaberry were collected from the Experimental Farm of Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. Pomegranate and henna were obtained from the local market. Plant samples were washed by tap water to remove dust, then dried in refresh air for 4 days. Dried samples were kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C till use.
Preparation of plant extracts
The plant extracts were prepared according to the method described by Hussain et al. (2012). In which, the used part of plants was grinded individually to semi-powder, using a grinder (LG BL 999SP). Briefly, 10 g of ground sample was extracted by 100 ml of sterilized distilled water in a conical flask and kept for 8 h at room temperature. The filtrate was separated from the solid residue by filtering through Whatman no. 1 filter paper. The process was repeated three times, and the obtained extracts were pooled. A stock solution of each extract was kept in the refrigerator at − 4 °C until use.
The experiment was carried out at the Experimental Farm of Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, ARC, Egypt, during two growing seasons (2016/2017 and 2017/2018). Grains of the susceptible wheat cv. “Gemmeiza-7” were sown in random plots (3 × 2 m2) at the rate of 40 g/plot. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replicates. The plant extracts were prepared at concentrations of (10,000 mg/l) and applied on leaves, using a hand sprayer until wetness of plants. The chemical fungicide, Fungshow (diniconazole) at 0.15 g/l, served as a comparable control. The plants were sprayed at booting plant growth stage, prior to the artificial inoculation of plants, by urediniospores powder mixture of P. triticina isolates (one volume of fresh urediniospores, 20 volume of talcum powder) according to Tervet and Cassel (1951). The plants were moisturized by a fine spray with water then dusted with urediniospores powder mixture of P. triticina isolates. Dusting was carried out at sunset before dew onset. Inoculation was done during the second half of February at the 7–8th growth stages adopted by Large (1954). The non-treated control plots were sprayed with distilled water.
Disease assessment was done based on the infection types of wheat leaf rust according to Johnston and Browder (1966), where immune (0) = no uredia or other macroscopic sign of infection, resistant (R) = small uredia surrounded by necrosis, moderately resistant (MR) = small to medium uredia surrounded by chlorosis or necrosis, moderately susceptible (MS) = medium-sized uredia that may be associated with chlorosis, and susceptible (S) = large uredia without chlorosis or necrosis. Disease severity was expressed as the percentage coverage of leaves as described by Peterson et al. (1948). The average coefficient of infection (ACI) was calculated according to Saari and Wilcoxson (1974) by multiplying of disease severity and constant values of infection types. The constant values for infection types were used based on the following: R = 0.2, MR = 0.4, MRMS = 0.6, MS = 0.8, and S = 1.0.
where C = infection in the control and T = infection in the treatment.
At harvest, the effects of treatments on grain yield components in terms of spike weight, 1000-kernel weight, and volume weight were estimated.
Biochemical changes in the wheat leaves treated with plant extracts were estimated at the Laboratory of Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. Leaf samples representing each treatment and controls were collected from plants at the 1st, 3rd, and 15th days after spraying to determine their effects on some of the biochemical components such as chlorophyll, phenols, and oxidative enzymes.
Estimation of chlorophyll contents
The contents of the total chlorophylls (a + b) were determined according to Dere et al. (1998). Fresh leaves (0.1 g) were cut into small fragments (1 × 1 mm) and immersed for 24 h at 4 °C in 20 ml methanol (96%) and then filtered through Whatman 47 mm GF/C filter paper. The absorbance of each filtrate was measured against a blank of 96% methanol at wavelengths of 666 and 653 nm for chlorophyll a and b, respectively. Results were expressed as mg g−1 fresh weight and calculated, using the following formulas (Lichtenthaler and Wellburn 1983):
Chlorophyll (Chl.) a = (15.65 A666 − 7.34 A653)
Chlorophyll (Chl.) b = (27.05 A653 − 11.21 A666)
Total chlorophyll = Chl. a + Chl. b
Estimation of phenol content
Total phenol content was estimated according to the method described by Malik and Singh (1980); 0.5 g of fresh leaves was ground by 10 ml of 80% ethanol and stored in a dark bottle at 4 °C for 72 h. Extracts were combined and filtered for determination, using Unico UV-2100 Spectrophotometer. The total phenol was measured by Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent, and the absorbance was read at 650 nm. The total phenol was expressed in mg g−1 fresh weight.
Estimation of oxidative enzyme activity
Peroxidase (POX) activity was directly determined according to a typical procedure proposed by Hammerschmidt et al. (1982). Polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity was determined according to the method described by Malik and Singh (1980), in which, 0.5 g leaf material was homogenized at 0–4 °C in 3 ml of 50 Mm TRIS buffer (PH 7.8), containing 1 mM EDTA-Na2 and 7.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone. The homogenates were centrifuged (12,000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C), and the total soluble enzyme activities were measured spectrophotometrically in the supernatant. Measurements were carried out at 25 °C, using a spectrophotometer (model UV-160A, Shimadzu, Japan). The enzyme assays were tested three times. Changes in absorbance at 470 nm for POX activity and 495 nm for PPO activity were recorded at 30-s intervals for 3 min. Enzyme activity was expressed as the increase in absorbance min−1 g−1 fresh weight.
Obtained data were subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), using the Statistical Analysis System package SAS software v.9.2 (SAS Institute 2010). Means were separated, using the least significant difference (LSD) test at P ≤ 0.05 (Steel and Torrie 1980).
Results and discussion
Effect of plant extracts on wheat leaf rust disease severity
Effect of the tested plant extracts on the average coefficients of infection (ACI) of wheat (cv. Gemmeiza-7) leaves by the leaf rust fungus, Puccinia triticina, and on the wheat yield components, under field conditions
Spike weight (g)
1000-kernel weight (g)
The findings showed that the prior application of the plant extracts of henna, acalypha, chinaberry, pomegranate, and lantana were good defense inducers for protecting wheat plants from the disease P. triticina, under field conditions. Similar results were found by Shabana et al. (2017) who reported a significant reduction in the leaf rust infection of wheat plants, using some plant extracts (garlic, clove, garden quinine, Brazilian pepper, anthi mandhaari, black cumin, white cedar, and neem), sprayed pre-infection on wheat seedlings. In vivo assay, methanol extract of Curcuma zedoaria rhizomes exhibited a strong activity against P. triticina. When the C. zedoaria methanol extracts were partitioned by various solvents, the layers of nhexane, methylene chloride, and ethyl acetate showed disease control values of (100, 80, and 43%), respectively (Han et al. 2017). Kumar et al. (2017) reported that the foliar spray of potato plants with Lantana camara extract, as an inducer before the inoculation with Alternaria solani, led to decrease the disease severity. Foliar spraying of plant extracts (pomegranate, eucalyptus, cactus, garlic and neem) significantly decreased leaf rust severity of wheat (Abd El-Malik and Abbas 2017). Antifungal activity of volatile components extracted from stem, leaf, and flower extracts, prepared from L. camara, showed a strong inhibitory effect against A. solani, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae, F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum, Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Verticillium dahlia (Boughalleb et al. 2005). Neem oil was found to give a significant protection against rust and downy mildew of alfalfa when applied as plant spraying (Morsy et al. 2011).
Data in Table 1 revealed that all the tested plant extracts significantly increased yield components of wheat plants infected with P. triticina in terms of spike weight, 1000-kernel weight, and volume weight (L), compared to the non-treated control. Lantana and henna extracts gave the highest spike weight (3.83 and 3.43 g, respectively) and 1000-kernel weight (46 and 43.24 g, respectively). However, acalypha and pomegranate gave the lowest values of these parameters. The highest volume weight (L) was also obtained by lantana extract (724.30 g), followed by henna (718.10 g), chinaberry (711.25 g), acalypha (705.84 g), and pomegranate (705.10 g). Lantana and henna were the best treatments in increasing the yield parameters of the P. triticina-infected wheat plants and superimposed the fungicide “Fungshow” in this respect (Table 1). These results show that yield components of wheat could be improved through treating by the plant extracts tested in this study, that increase spike weight, 1000-kernel weight, and volume weight. Obtained findings are in agreement with those reported by Shabana et al. (2017) who reported that the 1000-kernel weight of leaf rust-infected wheat sprayed with Brazilian pepper extract was improved by 15.73% than the untreated control, followed by white cedar (13.81%) and garlic (13.02%). They also found that the test weight increased by 4.48% when treated with garden quinine extract, followed by garlic (4.13%) compared to untreated. Abd El-Malik and Abbas (2017) reported that the foliar spraying of plant extracts (pomegranate, eucalyptus, cactus, garlic, and neem) significantly increased wheat yield components, including 1000-kernel weight and spike weight.
Biochemical analysis of wheat leaves treated with plant extracts
Induced resistance is environmentally friendly and confers to long-lasting protection against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens, diseases, bacteria, fungi, oomycetes, and nematode (Durrant and Dong 2004). Induced resistance is generally characterized by the increased synthesis of the chemical compounds in plant that can prevent pathogen’s growth and development, due to the gradual activity in antioxidant enzymes, then in biochemical increase (chlorophyll and phenol) in 3 times or systemic acquired resistance until the last time of sample taken (Agrios 2005).
Plants have the ability to synthesize aromatic secondary metabolites, like phenols, phenolic acids, quinones, flavones, flavonoids, flavonols, tannins, and coumarins (Cowan 1999). The components with phenolic structures, like carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol, are highly active against pathogens. Obtained findings are in agreement with Karavaev et al. (2002) who reported that the aqueous extracts from bird cherry tree Padus avium, aspen Populus tremula, and celandine Chelidonium majus effectively suppressed the P. triticina and antifungal activity was attributed to the high content of phenolic compounds in the leaves of these plants.
Oxidative enzyme activity
The underlying mechanisms of disease suppression by plant extracts are not clearly understood, but the involvement of induced resistance is considered (Fokkema 1993). In the present work, significant increases in POX and PPO recorded at the plant extract treatments were supported by Kumar et al. (2017). Karavaev et al. (2002) recorded a high POX activity in the wheat leaves treated with the aqueous extracts from bird cherry tree, Padus avium, aspen Populus tremula, and celandine Chelidonium majus, to suppress the P. triticina. Kumar et al. (2017) recorded the maximum PPO activity in L. camara-treated potato leaves. Also, willow aqueous extracts reduced the disease incidence of Fusarium wilt in tomato seedlings by inducing the activities of antioxidant defensive enzymes and decreasing the level of lipid peroxidation after 3 and 7 days of infection (Farag et al. 2011).
The phenomenon of inducing resistance in plants by abiotic compounds includes plant extracts that are more environmentally approached for crop protection against infection with many diseases (Morsy et al. 2011). Swamy et al. (2015) mentioned that extract of L. camara contained 32 bioactive components as revealed by GC-MS study. Satya Prasad et al. (2015) reported that the extract of A. indica has high antioxidant activity on phytochemicals, low LC50 value, and the presence of carbohydrates, amino acids, proteins, tannins, flavonoids, anthocyanins and Î2-cyanins, quinones, glycosides, and phenols in aqueous, methanol, and chloroform extracts. Awe et al. (2013) analyzed the leaf extract of A. wilkesiana and revealed a high presence of tannins and glycoside, a moderate presence of saponin, flavonoids, phylobatanins, and glycosides and slight presence of alkaloids and cardiac glycosides. These groups of compounds serve as plant defense mechanisms against leaf rust of wheat. The plant extracts are nonpolluting, cost-effective, and non-hazardous and can be prepared with available materials in the field.
It may be concluded from the present findings that prior-infection treatments with the plant extracts (henna, lantana, chinaberry, acalypha, and pomegranate) gave an evidence to play an important role as inducers to resist the leaf rust of wheat caused by P. triticina. The tested plant extracts decreased disease severity through biochemical changes in wheat leaves resulting in increased chlorophyll, phenol contents, and oxidative enzymes activities of POX and PPO that are responsible for protecting wheat from leaf rust infection. Prior application of plant inducers to challenge inoculation sensitized the plants to produce an elevated level of defense-related enzymes like peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
All authors conceived the presented idea, developed the theory, and performed the analysis. Elkhwaga AA carried out the experiments under supervision by co-authors. Draz IS verified the analytical methods, investigated the findings, and wrote the manuscript with input from co-authors. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript
Draz I.S., Wheat Disease Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt. Elkhwaga A.A. and Ismail A.A., Department of Integrated Control, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt. Elzaawely A.A. and El-Zahaby H.M., Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Abd El-Malik NI, Abbas IK (2017) Evaluation of certain plant extracts for the control of wheat leaf rust disease. Egypt J Biol Pest Cont 27(1):23–33Google Scholar
- Abdel-Hak TM, El-Sherif NA, Bassiouny AA, Shafik II, El-Daoudi YH (1980) Control of wheat leaf rust by systemic fungicides. Proc. of the Fifth European and Mediterranean Cereal Rusts Conf. Bari, Italy, pp 255–266Google Scholar
- Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology. 5th Edn. Academic press, New York USA. 952 pagesGoogle Scholar
- Awe FA, Giwa-Ajeniya AO, Akinyemi AA, Ezeri GNO (2013) Phytochemical analysis of Acalypha wilkesiana, Leucaena leucocephala, Pepper omia pellucida and Sena alata leaves. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES) 2(9):41–44Google Scholar
- Bhuvaneshwari V, Amsaveni R, Kalaiselvi M, Rajeshwari V, Paul PK (2015) Induced resistance by neem extracts in plants. International Journal of Biosciences and Nanosciences 2(12):221–224Google Scholar
- Boughalleb N, Débbabi N, Jannet HB, Mighri Z, Mahjoub M (2005) Antifungal activity of volatile components extracted from leaves, stems and flowers of four plants growing in Tunisia. Phytopathol Mediterr 44:307–312. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-1806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dere S, Gunes T, Sivaci R (1998) Spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll A, B and total carotenoid contents of some algae species using different solvents. Tr J Botany 22:13–17Google Scholar
- Dubey NK, Srivastava B, Kumar A (2008) Current status of plant products as botanical pesticides in storage pest management. Journal of Biopesticides 1(2):182–186Google Scholar
- Geetha HM, Shetty HS (2002) Induction of resistance in pearl millet against mildew disease caused by Sclerospora graminicola using benzothiadiazole, calcium chloride and hydrogen peroxide – a comparative evaluation. Crop Prot 21:601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00150-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Han JW, Shim SH, Jang KS, Choi YH, Dang QL, Kim H, Choi GJ (2017) In vivo assessment of plant extracts for control of plant diseases: a sesquiterpene ketolactone isolated from Curcuma zedoaria suppresses wheat leaf rust. J Environ Sci Health B 53(2):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1397448 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassan MEM, Abd El-Rahman SS, El-Abbasi IH, Mikhail MS (2007) Change in peroxidase activity due to resistance induced against faba bean chocolate spot disease. Egypt J Phytopathol 35:35–48Google Scholar
- Hussain AI, Chatha SAS, Noor S, Khan ZA, Arshad MU, Rathore HA, Sattar MZ (2012) Effect of extraction techniques and solvent systems on the extraction of antioxidant components from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Hulls. Food Anal Methods 5:890–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-011-9325-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnston CO, Browder LE (1966) Seventh revision of the international register of physiologic races of Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis Rep 50:756–760Google Scholar
- Karavaev VA, Solntsev MK, Kuznetsov AM, Polyakova IB, Frantsev VV, Yurina EV, Yurina TP, Taborsky V, Polak J, Lebeda A, Kudela V (2002) Plant extracts as the source of physiologically active compounds suppressing the development of pathogenic fungi. Plant Protect Sci 38:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malik CP, Singh MB (1980) Plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p 286Google Scholar
- Morsy K.M., Abdel-Monaim, M. F. and Mazen, M. M. 2011. Use of abiotic and biotic inducers for controlling fungal diseases and improving growth of alfalfa. World J Agric Sci, 7 (5): 566–576Google Scholar
- Rewal HS, Jhooty JS (1985) Differential response of wheat varieties to systemic fungicides applied to Ustilago tritici (Pers.). Rostr IndianJ Agric Sci 55:548–549Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc (2010) SAS® 9.2 companion for windows, second edition. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- Satya Prasad M, Suman Joshi DSD, Narendra K, Srinivas K, Srilakshmi Bai J, Lakshmi Chandana M, Krishna Satya A (2015) Phytochemical and pharmacological evaluation of Euphorbiaceae family plant leaves-Acalypha indica L., Croton bonplandianum Baill. Mintage Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences 4(3):17–22Google Scholar
- Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics, Second edn. Mc Graw Hill Book Company, New York, p 633Google Scholar
- Swamy MK, Sinniah UR, Akhtar MS (2015) In vitro pharmacological activities and GC-MS analysis of different solvent extracts of Lantana camara leaves collected from tropical region of Malaysia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015(Article ID 506413):9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/506413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tervet I, Cassel RC (1951) The use of cyclone separation in race identification of cereal rusts. Phytopathology 41:282–285Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.