Advertisement

Characterization of antioxidative peptide purified from black eelpout (Lycodes diapterus) hydrolysate

  • Jung Kwon Lee
  • Hee-Guk ByunEmail author
Open Access
Research article
First Online:
  • 201 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Marine Biotechnology

Abstract

The functional peptides from protein hydrolysates of various fishery sources have been identified such as antioxidant activity. The main intention of this study was purification and characterization of antioxidative peptide from black eelpout muscle. The antioxidative peptides were purified from black eelpout (Lycodes diapterus) muscle using different proteases. Antioxidant activity of black eelpout hydrolysates was evaluated using DPPH radical scavenging activity. Among six hydrolysates, the pepsin hydrolysate had the highest antioxidant activity compared to the other hydrolysates. Therefore, it was further purified and a peptide with seven amino acid residues of DLVKVEA (784 Da) was identified by amino acid sequence analysis. The EC50 value for scavenging DPPH radicals by purified peptide was 688.77 μM. Additionally, the purified peptide exhibited protective effect against DNA damage induces by oxidation in mouse macrophages (RAW 264.7 cells). The results of this study suggest that black eelpout muscle protein hydrolysate could potentially contribute to development of bioactive peptides in basic research.

Keywords

Antioxidant DPPH radical scavenging Peptide Hydrolysates Pepsin Black eelpout muscle 

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

BHA

Butylated hydroxyanisole

BHT

Butylated hydroxytoluene

CAT

Catalase

DAD

Diode array detector

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

DPPH

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate

ESI-MS

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

GR

Glutathione reductase

GSH-Px

Glutathione peroxidase

H2O2

Hydrogen peroxide

O2−

Superoxide anion

•OH

Hydroxyl radical

Q-TOF

Quadrupole time-of-flight

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

RP-HPLC

Reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography

SEM

Scanning electron microscope

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

SPSS

Statistical package for the social sciences

TBHQ

Tbutylhydroquinone

TFA

Trifluoroacetic acid

Background

Free radicals are highly reactive species with their single and unbalanced electrons. The oxidation by free radicals in the body may cause many chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders (Dong et al. 2008). Fatty acids and lipids oxidation induced by free radicals deteriorate the food quality (Liceaga-Gesualdo and Li-Chan 1999).

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) (O2− (superoxide anion), •OH (hydroxyl radical), and H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide)) are metabolic by-products of normal aerobic metabolism (Castro and Freeman 2001). Nevertheless, the body is supported with several antioxidant defense systems where they can scavenge and transform ROS or free radicals into harmless species (Yeung et al. 2002). The antioxidant defense system includes catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione reductase (GR). Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants team up to scavenge and eradicate the oxidative stress (McCord 1993). Steady-state maintenance of ROS/antioxidant ratio is vital for avoiding oxidative stress (Somani and Rybak 1996). Synthetic antioxidants (butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), tbutylhydroquinone (TBHQ), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and propyl gallate) have been widely used as food preservatives as they delay the discoloration and deterioration caused by oxidation (Wanita and Lorenz 1996). So, the use of these synthetic antioxidants has been limited in some countries due to their potential health hazard (Becker 1993).

Recently, enzymatic hydrolysis with proteases has garnered much attention. Protein hydrolysates or peptides affect health-related functions such as antioxidant function (Clemente 2000). Therefore, various antioxidant peptides have been isolated from marine organisms through enzymatic hydrolysis, including abalone muscle (Haliotis discus hannai Ino) and scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) (Zhou et al. 2012), threadfin bream surimi (Wiriyaphan et al. 2012), croaker (Otolithes ruber) muscle (Nazeer et al. 2012), sand eel (Lee et al. 2011a, 2011b), sardinelle (Sardinella aurita) (Bougatef et al. 2010), tuna liver (Je et al. 2009), marine rotifer (Byun et al. 2009), and algae protein waste (Sheih et al. 2009).

Enzymatic hydrolysates exhibited several advantages when incorporated into foods, by improving water-binding ability, solubility of protein, emulsifying stability, heat stability of myofibrillar protein, and the nutritional quality of foods. Thus, enzymatic hydrolysis has become an appreciated tool for modifying the applicability of proteins (Korhonen et al. 1998). Normally, bioactive peptides remain inactive within the parent protein molecule until they are released by hydrolysis. Most of bioactive peptides are composed with 2–20 amino acids. Amino acids arrangement of the peptides plays a critical role in its bioactivity (Himaya et al. 2012).

The black eelpout, Lycodes diapterus, is distributed in the Northwest Pacific/North of central East Sea of Korea and the Sea of Okhotsk and inhabits sand and mud bottoms in deep water of 150–200 m depth. Black eelpout is a traditional food that is rich in protein, essential amino acids, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamins. In the present study, we investigated the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) radical scavenging activity of enzymatically prepared black eelpout muscle protein hydrolysate to isolate a potent antioxidant peptide. And the protective effect of the purified peptide against deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) oxidation induced by the hydroxyl radical was verified further.

Materials and methods

Materials

Fresh samples of black eelpout (Lycodes diapterus) were obtained from East Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Gangneung, South Korea. The bones and viscera were removed from the black eelpout. Then the separated muscle was stored at − 80 °C until use. Several commercial enzymes, such as α-chymotrypsin, papain, pepsin, and trypsin, were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Alcalase and Neutrase enzymes were obtained from Novo Co. (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). DPPH was obtained from Wako Chemical Co. All other reagents used in this study were reagent grade chemicals.

Analysis of proximate compositions

Crude protein content of black eelpout was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Auto Kjeldahl system, Buchi B-324/435/412, Switzerland). Ether extraction method was used to determine the crude lipid content. Moisture content was determined by oven drying at 105 °C for 24 h. Ash content was determined by a muffler furnace at 550 °C for 4 h (Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) 2000). Amino acids were analyzed using an automatic analyzer (Hitachi Model 835-50, Japan) with a C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Watchers, MA). The reaction was carried out at 38 °C, with the detection wavelength at 254 nm and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. All analyses were carried out in triplicate.

Preparation of black eelpout muscle hydrolysates

To prepare black eelpout muscle hydrolysates, enzymatic hydrolysis was performed using various enzymes (Alcalase, α-chymotrypsin, Neutrase, papain, pepsin, and trypsin) at their optimal conditions. Black eelpout muscle was hydrolyzed separately using various enzymes with a substrate to enzyme ratio of 1:100 for 6 h, under optimum pH and temperature conditions (Table 1). At the end of 6 h, hydrolysates were filtered by glass filter and lyophilized and stored at − 80 °C until use. The yield of hydrolysate from black eelpout muscle was calculated as follows:
$$ \mathrm{Yield}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{weight}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{black}\ \mathrm{eelpout}\ \mathrm{hydrolysates}}{\mathrm{weight}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{black}\ \mathrm{eelpout}}\times 100 $$
Table 1

Optimal conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis of various enzymes

Enzyme

Buffer

pH

Temperature (°C)

Alcalase

50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4

7.0

50

α-Chymotrypsin

50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4

7.0

37

Neutrase

50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4

7.0

50

Papain

50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4

7.0

37

Pepsin

20 mM HCl

2.0

37

Trypsin

50 mM Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4

7.0

37

Determination of DPPH radical scavenging activity

DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA) was assessed by using the method of Yen and Hsieh (1995) with minor modifications. The sample was mixed with 120 μL of methanol and 40 μL of 0.15 mM DPPH in methanol was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (JASCO, Japan). The control sample was prepared in the same manner where methanol was used instead of the 40 μL sample volume. DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
$$ \mathrm{RSA}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{\left({A}_{\mathrm{control}}-{A}_{\mathrm{sample}}\right)}{A_{\mathrm{control}}}\times 100 $$
where Asample is the absorbance of sample and Acontrol is the absorbance of the control. The EC50 value is defined as an effective concentration of peptide that is required to scavenge 50% of radical activity.

Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides

The black eelpout muscle hydrolysate was dissolved in distilled water and loaded onto a Sephadex G-25 gel filtration column (2.5 × 70 cm) which had been previously equilibrated with distilled water. The column was then eluted with distilled water at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min (fraction volume 7.5 mL) and separated fractions were monitored at 215 nm, collected at a volume of 7.5 mL, and measured for DPPH radical scavenging activity. Highest active fraction was injected into a preparative reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) column (Grom-Sil 120 ODS-5ST, ø 10 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Grom™, Germany) and was separated using linear gradient of acetonitrile (0–20% v/v) containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) on an RP-HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, USA). Elution peaks were monitored at 280 nm on diode array detector (DAD). The purified fractions from preparative column were monitored at 280 nm and purified by RP-HPLC on a C18 analytical column (ø 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using an acetonitrile gradient of 5–30% (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min for 40 min. Finally, the fraction with the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity was collected and lyophilized followed by the amino acid sequence identification.

Determination of molecular weight and amino acid sequence

Molecular weight and amino acid sequence of purified peptide from black eelpout muscle protein were determined by quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometry (Micromass, Altrincham, UK) coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The purified peptide dissolved in methanol/water (1:1, v/v) was infused into the ESI source and the molecular mass was determined by doubly charged (M+ 2H)2+ state in the mass spectrum. Following molecular mass determination, the peptide was automatically selected for fragmentation and sequence information was obtained by tandem MS analysis.

Protective potential by the hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage

To assess the protective effects of the hydrolysate against DNA damage caused by hydroxyl radicals, the reaction was induced by placing the following reagents in an Eppendorf tube: 5 μL of genomic DNA (RAW 264.7 cell line), 2 mM FeSO4, and various concentrations of the purified peptide from black eelpout hydrolysate. The mixture was then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by the addition of 4 μL of 10 mM H2O2 (Dávalos et al. 2004). Finally, the mixture was subjected to 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA bands were stained with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed for statistical significance using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software (version 14). All values obtained from three different experiments were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation (SD).

Results and discussion

Proximate composition of black eelpout muscle

Proximate composition of black eelpout muscle showed the 20.81% moisture content, 8.63% lipid content, 4.09% ash, 2.46% carbohydrate, and 64.02% protein content (Table 2). The protein content was the highest among all the composition contents. However, the low lipid and ash content suggests that the extraction processes by enzymatic hydrolysis of biofunctional peptide is effective. The most abundant amino acids in black eelpout muscle were glycine, alanine, lysine, and leucine which accounted for 20.82%, 17.13%, 8.1%, and 6.24%, respectively (Table 3). Generally, fish and other mammalian skin have higher percentage of Gly, Leu, and Pro compared to muscle proteins (Gomez-Guillen et al. 2002).
Table 2

Proximate compositions of black eelpout muscle

Components

Content (%)

Moisture

20.81

Protein

64.02

Lipid

8.63

Ash

4.09

Carbohydrate

2.46

Table 3

Amino acid contents of black eelpout muscle

Amino acids

Contents (%)

Tau

0.78

Asp

6.08

Thr

4.07

Ser

3.93

Glu

2.21

Gly

20.82

Ala

17.13

Val

3.61

Cys

0.34

Met

1.96

Ile

2.43

Leu

6.24

Try

1.71

Phe

2.33

Lys

8.10

His

1.80

Arg

5.13

Total

100.00

Antioxidant activity of black eelpout muscle hydrolysates

Black eelpout muscle protein hydrolysates were prepared by using commercial proteases including Alcalase, α-chymotrypsin, Neutrase, papain, pepsin, and trypsin. The hydrolysis yields were 68.28%, 66.85%, 66.14%, and 58.76% for papain, Alcalase, pepsin, and trypsin, respectively (Table 4). Among six hydrolysates, pepsin hydrolysate exhibited the greatest DPPH radical scavenging activity relative to the other hydrolysates. In terms of the DPPH radical scavenging activation (Fig. 1), the lowest EC50 value was exhibited by the pepsin hydrolysate at 0.83 mg/mL. Thus the pepsin hydrolysate may contain bioactive compounds that could react with free radicals to transform them into more stable products and terminate the radical chain reaction. Peptides with antioxidative activity have been obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis of various marine organisms (Je et al. 2007). Several studies have suggested that the variation of antioxidant activity of a peptide is due to its amino acid sequence and length (Kim et al. 2001). However, DPPH radical scavenging activity of pepsin hydrolysate was lower than that of synthetic antioxidants BHA and BHT. The next stage in analysis required the use of HPLC for purifying the antioxidant peptide from pepsin hydrolysate of black eelpout muscle.
Table 4

Yields of various hydrolysates from black eelpout muscle

Hydrolysates

Yields (%)

Alcalase

66.85

α-Chymotrypsin

51.30

Neutrase

39.47

Papain

68.28

Pepsin

66.14

Trypsin

58.76

Fig. 1

EC50 values for DPPH radical scavenging activity of black eelpout muscle hydrolysates. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA

Purification of antioxidant peptide

To identify the antioxidant peptide from pepsin hydrolysate of black eelpout muscle, the use of different chromatographic techniques is required. As shown in Fig. 2, chromatographic profiles were obtained during different purification steps of black eelpout muscle hydrolysate. In the first step, pepsin hydrolysate was separated into four fractions (A–D) on a Sephadex G-25 chromatography column (Fig. 2I). Among separated fractions, the B fraction had the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity at 0.65 mg/mL (Fig. 2I). Sephadex G-25 column chromatography separates according to molecular-size, where the primary fractions contain large-molecular-size peptides, and secondary fractions contain small-molecular-size peptides. According to Pihlanto (2000), numerous bioactive peptides are found between 2 and 20 amino acids in length with a small-molecular-size. Therefore, the secondary fractions were assumed to have the greatest potential bioactivity. Fraction B was further separated by RP-HPLC using an ODS column and subsequently fractionated into three fractions (F1–F3) (Fig. 2II). Among separated fractions, the fraction F1 showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity with the EC50 value of 87.45 μg/mL (Fig. 2II). Fraction F1–1, with the strongest DPPH radical scavenging activity was purified further by using RP-HPLC on the C18 analytical column a linear gradient of acetonitrile (5–30%) for 40 min at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min (Fig. 2III). The EC50 value of the purified peptide was 51.12 μg/mL, 16.24–fold compared to the pepsin hydrolysate (0.83 mg/mL) using the three-step purification procedure (Table 5). A single peptide fraction that demonstrated DPPH radical scavenging activity was purified on an analytical HPLC column and their amino acid sequences were determined by N-terminal sequencing analysis.
Fig. 2

Steps for the purification of DPPH radical scavenging activity peptide from black eelpout muscle hydrolysate. I Sephadex G-25 Gel filtration chromatogram of hydrolysates. Gel filtration chromatogram of hydrolysates prepared with black eelpout muscle. Separation was performed with 1.5 mL/min and collected at a fraction volume of 7.5 mL. The fractions isolated by Sephadex G-25 Gel column were separated (A–D) and DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined as upper panel. II, III Reverse phase-HPLC chromatograms of the potent DPPH radical scavenging activity fractions from the previous steps. The lower panels of each pair show the chromatography results of separated fractions while the top panels of each pair represent the DPPH radical scavenging activity of separated fractions in terms of their EC50 values expressed in mg/mL (I) or μg/mL (II, III). Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA

Table 5

Purification of antioxidant peptide from black eelpout muscle hydrolysate by pepsin treatment

Purification step

EC50 value (μg/mL)

Purification folda

Pepsin hydrolysate

830.01 ± 0.05

1.00

Sephadex gel filtration (B)

650.32 ± 0.14

1.28

RP−HPLC (F1)

87.45 ± 0.05

9.49

Purified peptide (F1–1)

56.12 ± 0.01

16.24

aRelative value of reciprocal of DPPH radical scavenging activity by EC50

Characterization of purified antioxidant peptide

The purified fraction F1–1 was analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) for molecular mass determination and ESI-MS/MS for the peptide characterization. Amino acid sequence of purified antioxidant peptide was identified as Asp-Leu-Val-Lys-Val-Glu-Ala with EC50 value and molecular weight of 688.77 μM and 784 Da, respectively (Fig. 3). These results support for the general finding that short peptides with 2–10 amino acids demonstrate greater bioactive properties such as antioxidant activity compared to their parent native proteins or large polypeptides (Li et al. 2007). In this study, the purified antioxidant peptide was found to have a similar sequence with the other reports, including the sardinelle (Sardinellaaurita) (Gly-Ala-Trp-Ala, RSA = 52 ± 1.44% at 150 μg/mL) (Bougatef et al. 2010), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) (Asp-Pro-Ala-Leu-Ala-Thr-Glu-Pro-Asp-Pro-Met-Pro-Phe, IC50 = 8.82 μM) (Ngo et al. 2010), black pomfret (Parastromateus niger) (Ala-Met-Thr-Gly-Leu-Glu-Ala, RSA = 78.6%) (Jai Ganesh et al. 2011), and croaker (Gly-Asn-Arg-Gly-Phe-Ala-Cys-Arg-His-Ala) (Samaranayaka and Li-chan 2011) (Lee et al. 2011a, 2011b). According to previous reports, the antioxidant peptides possess some metal chelation or hydrogen/electron donating activity, thereby allowing them to interact with free radicals and to terminate the radical chain reaction or prevent their formation (Ren et al. 2008; You et al. 2010). Amino acid constituents and sequence of peptides are vital for their antioxidant activity. Hydrophobic amino acids and one or more residues of cysteine, methionine, histidine, tyrosine, tryptophan, proline, and phenylalanine have been identified to enhance the activities of the antioxidant peptides (Ren et al. 2008; Je et al. 2007; You et al. 2010). As it has been confirmed, functional peptides rely on amino acid sequence and structure (Elias et al. 2008). Li et al. (2007) reported that the antioxidant activity of histidine-containing peptides was accredited to the proton-donation ability of the histidine imidazole group. Also, histidine and proline take part in the antioxidant activity of designed peptides tests, among Pro-His-His exhibited the greatest antioxidant activity (Tsuge et al. 1991). As reported by Dávalos et al. (2004), among amino acids, tyrosine, tryptophan, and methionine exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, followed by histidine, cysteine, and phenylalanine. The antioxidant activity of peptides containing histidine has been accredited to the chelating and lipid radical-trapping ability of the imidazole ring (Murase et al. 1993; Park et al. 2001). However, the active peptide in our study did not have hydrophobic amino acids. Since, our peptide yielded larger EC50 values.
Fig. 3

Identification of molecular mass and amino acid sequence of the purified peptides from black eelpout muscle hydrolysate by HPLC. MS/MS experiments were performed on a Q-TOF tandem mass spectrometer equipped with a nano-ESI source

Prevention of oxidation-induced DNA damage by a black eelpout peptide

We evaluated the protective activity of purified antioxidant peptide against hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage in in vitro studies by using RAW 264.7 cell line. As shown in Fig. 4, the purified peptide had a protective effect against DNA oxidation induced by hydroxyl radical with increasing peptide concentrations ranging from 50 to 200 μM. These results indicate that black eelpout peptide purified, exerted adequate protective effects on radical-mediated DNA damage. Furthermore, our results clearly explain the fact that purified peptide can inhibit oxidative damage to DNA when exposed to OH radical generated by Fe(II)/H2O2. Fe2+ catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to OH radical in physical systems. The OH radical highly reacted leading to damage of both the purine and pyrimidine base and also deoxyribose backbone lesion for DNA (Ngo et al. 2009). DNA is another sensitive bio-target for ROS-mediated oxidative damage (Martinez et al. 2003) as it is known to initiate carcinogenesis or pathogenesis in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, ROS, a hydroxyl radical, has been recognized as a DNA-damaging agent of physiological significance (You et al. 2002). Bioactive peptides with various biological activities such as antioxidative activity can be utilized in order to develop pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products in industrial scale (Abuine et al. 2019).
Fig. 4

Protective effect on oxidation-induced DNA damage of purified peptide from black eelpout at various concentrations. Blank: untreated sample and H2O2, FeSO4. Control: distilled water instead of sample. Sample: Treated sample, H2O2, and FeSO4. (+, treatment; −, not treatment)

Conclusion

In this study, black eelpout muscle protein was hydrolyzed using enzymatic hydrolysis with various enzymes. The antioxidant activity of the different enzyme hydrolysates was determined and compared. Pepsin hydrolysate showed the highest antioxidant activity and thus it was further purified using chromatography. A seven-amino acid residue peptide with antioxidant activity was identified from the pepsin hydrolysate of black eelpout muscle. Collectively, the results of this study suggest that black eelpout muscle protein hydrolysate could potentially contribute to development of bioactive peptides in basic research.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from Marine Bioprocess Research Center of the Marine Biotechnology Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime, Republic of Korea.

Authors’ contributions

HGB and LJK conceived and designed the study and helped to draft the manuscript and revised the manuscript. LJK performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and writing of the manuscript were funded by a grant from Marine Bioprocess Research Center of the Marine Biotechnology Program funded by the Ministry of Land.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abuine R, Rathnayake AU, Byun HG. Biological activity of peptides purified from fish skin hydrolysates. Fish Aquat Sci. 2019;22:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemist; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Becker GL. Preserving food and health: antioxidants make functional, nutritious preservatives. Food Process. 1993;12:54–6.Google Scholar
  4. Bougatef A, Nedjar-Arroume N, Manni L, Ravallec R, Barkia A, Guillochon D, et al. Purification and identification of novel antioxidant peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of sardinelle (Sardinella aurita) by-products proteins. Food Chem. 2010;118:559–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byun HG, Lee JK, Park HG, Jeon JK, Kim SK. Antioxidant peptides isolated from the marine rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis. Process Biochem. 2009;44:842–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro L, Freeman BA. Reactive oxygen species in human health and disease. Nutrition. 2001;170:161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemente A. Enzymatic protein hydrolysates in human nutrition. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2000;11:254–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dávalos A, Miguel M, Bartolome B, López-Fandino R. Antioxidant activity of peptides derived from egg white proteins by enzymatic hydrolysis. J Food Prot. 2004;67:1939–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong S, Zeng N, Wang D, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Yang H. Antioxidant and biochemical properties of protein hydrolysates prepared from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Food Chem. 2008;107:1485–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elias RJ, Kellerby SS, Decker EA. Antioxidant activity of proteins and peptides. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008;48:430–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomez-Guillen MC, Yurnay J, Fernandez-Diaz MD, Ulmo N, Lizarbe MA, Montero P. Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from different marine species: a comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. 2002;16:25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Himaya SWA, Ngo DH, Ryu BM, Kim SK. An active peptide purified from gastrointestinal enzyme hydrolysate of Pacific cod skin gelatin attenuates angiotensin-1 converting enzyme (ACE) activity and cellular oxidative stress. Food Chem. 2012;132:1872–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jai Ganesh R, Nazeer RA, Sampath kumar NS. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptide from black pomfret, Parastromateus niger (Bloch, 1975) viscera protein hydrolysate. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2011;20:1087–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Je JY, Lee KH, Lee MH, Ahn CB. Antioxidant and antihypertensive protein hydrolysates produced from tuna liver by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Res Int. 2009;42:1266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Je JY, Qian Z, Byun HG, Kim SK. Purification and characterization of an antioxidant peptide obtained from tuna backbone protein by enzymatic hydrolysis. Process Biochem. 2007;42:840–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim SK, Kim YT, Byun HG, Nam KS, Joo DS, Shahidi F. Isolation and characterization of antioxidative peptides from gelatin hydrolysate of Alaska Pollack skin. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:1984–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korhonen M, Pihlanto-Leppala A, Tupasela T. Impact of processing on bioactive proteins and peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1998;9:307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee WS, Jeon JK, Byun HG. Characterization of a novel antioxidative peptide from the sand eel Hypoptychus dybowskii. Process Biochem. 2011b;46:1207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee WS, Kim YT, Byun HG. Antioxidant activities of steamed extract from squid (Todarodes pacificus) muscle. J Food Sci Nutr. 2011a.Google Scholar
  20. Li B, Chen F, Wang X, Ji B, Wu Y. Isolation and identification of antioxidative peptides from porcine collagen hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2007;102(4):1135–43.Google Scholar
  21. Liceaga-Gesualdo AM, Li-Chan ECY. Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysate from herring (Clupea harengus). J Food Sci. 1999;64:1000–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martinez GR, Loureiro AP, Marques SA, Miyamoto S, Yamaguchi LF, Onuki J. Oxidative and alkylating damage in DNA. Mutat Res. 2003;554:115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCord JM. Human disease. Free radicals, and the oxidant/antioxidant balance. Clin Biochem. 1993;26:351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murase H, Nagao A, Terao J. Antioxidant and emulsifying activity of N-(longchain-acyl) histidine and N-(long-chain-acyl) carnosine. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41:1601–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nazeer RA, Sampath Kumar NS, Jai GR. In vitro and in vivo studies on the antioxidant activity of fish peptide isolated from the croaker (Otolithes ruber) muscle protein hydrolysate. Peptides. 2012;35:261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ngo DH, Qian ZJ, Ryu BM, Park JW, Kim SK. In vitro antioxidant activity of a peptide isolated from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) scale gelatin in free radical-mediated oxidative systems. J Funct Foods. 2010;2:107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ngo DN, Lee SH, Kim MM, Kim SK. Production of chitin oligosaccharides with different molecular weights and their antioxidant effect in RAW 264.7 cells. J Funct Foods. 2009;1:188–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park PJ, Jung WK, Nam KS, Shahidi F, Kim SK. Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptides from protein hydrolysate of lecithin free egg yolk. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;78:651–6.Google Scholar
  29. Pihlanto L. Bioactive peptides derived from bovine whey proteins: opioid and ace-inhibitory. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2000;11:347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ren J, Zhao M, Shi J, Wang J, Jiang Y, Cui C, et al. Purification and identification of antioxidant peptides from grass carp muscle hydrolysates by consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2008;108:727–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samaranayaka AGP, Li-chan ECY. Food derived peptidic antioxidants: a review of their production, assessment, and potential applications. J Funct Foods. 2011;3:229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheih IC, Wu TK, Fang TJ. Antioxidant properties of a new antioxidative peptide from algae protein waste hydrolysate in different oxidation systems. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:3419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Somani SM, Rybak LP. Comparative effects of exercise training on transcription of antioxidant enzyme and the activity in old rat heart. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996;40:205–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuge N, Eikawa T, Nomura Y, Yamamoto M, Sugisawa K. Antioxidative activity of peptides prepared by enzymatic hydrolsis of egg-white albumin. Nippon Nogeik Kaishi. 1991;65:1635–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wanita A, Lorenz K. Antioxidant potential of 5-npentadecylresorcinol. J Food Process Pres. 1996;20:410–29.Google Scholar
  36. Wiriyaphan C, Chitsomboon B, Yongsawadigul J. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates derived from threadfin bream surimi byproducts. Food Chem. 2012;132:104–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yen GC, Hsieh PP. Antioxidative activity and scavenging effects on active oxygen of xylose-lysine Maillard reaction products. J Sci Food Agric. 1995;67:415–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeung SY, Lan WH, Huang CS, Lin CP, Chan CP, Chang MC, et al. Scavenging property of three cresol isomers against H2O2, hypochlorite, superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40:1403–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. You HJ, Oh DH, Choi CY, Lee DG, Hahm KS, Moon AR. Protective effect of metallothionein-III on DNA damage in response to reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys. 2002;1573:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. You L, Zhao M, Regenstein JM, Ren J. Purification and identification of antioxidative peptides from loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) protein hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Food Res Int. 2010;43:1167–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou DY, Tang Y, Zhu BW, Qin L, Li DM, Yang JF, et al. Antioxidant activity of hydrolysates obtained from scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) and abalone (Haliotis discus hannai Ino) muscle. Food Chem. 2012;132:815–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine BiotechnologyGangneung-Wonju National UniversityGangneungRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer InstituteUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations