Advertisement

JA Clinical Reports

, 5:28 | Cite as

Prolonged neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal after sugammadex administration in cesarean section under general anesthesia: a case report

  • Kuniaki Moriwaki
  • Kenji KayashimaEmail author
Open Access
Case report
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Background

We present a rare case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal after sugammadex administration in a pregnant patient being treated with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old woman at 34 weeks gestation, weighing 42.5 kg, and receiving magnesium sulfate 94 mg/kg for preeclampsia and nifedipine 20 mg, underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia for abruptio placentae. Her trachea was intubated after administering rocuronium 0.94 mg/kg. Postoperatively, sugammadex 4.7 mg/kg was administered at post-tetanic count 2, 163 min after rocuronium administration. However, 9 min after sugammadex administration, the train-of-four ratio only reached 0.7. Fifteen min after sugammadex administration, extubation was successfully performed when the train-of-four ratio reached 0.9 after administration of atropine 0.5 mg and neostigmine 1.0 mg.

Conclusions

Caution is required in pregnant women on high-dose magnesium sulfate with nifedipine, which may cause prolongation of neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal.

Keywords

Pregnancy Cesarean section General anesthesia Neuromuscular blockade 

Abbreviations

BMI

Body mass index

C-section

Cesarean section

PTC

Post-tetanic count

TOF

Train-of-four

Background

Rocuronium, a neuromuscular blocking agent, provides excellent to good intubating conditions in Cesarean section (C-section) patients, and is safe for both the mother and the fetus [1]. Rapid injection of an intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate 60 mg/kg administered before rocuronium was shown to significantly prolong recovery from neuromuscular blockade [2]. In the experimental setting, administration of a high dose of magnesium 87 mg/kg caused the twitch height to decrease to 33% of the baseline value [3]. Data on onset of rocuronium action with magnesium are available in non-pregnant [4], but not in pregnant patients.

Sugammadex provides rapid and dose-dependent reversal of profound neuromuscular blockade induced by high-dose rocuronium (1.0 or 1.2 mg/kg) in adult surgical patients [5]. Pre-treatment with magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg was observed to not significantly affect the recovery time of moderate neuromuscular blockade facilitated by sugammadex [6]. Combination of magnesium sulfate with a calcium-antagonist in patients undergoing C-section under general anesthesia may or may not prolong the neuromuscular blockade [7, 8].

We present here a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal after sugammadex administration in a non-obese pregnant patient being treated with a high-loading dose of magnesium sulfate 94 mg/kg and nifedipine, a calcium-antagonist, who underwent C-section under general anesthesia.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old woman, at 34 weeks of pregnancy (144 cm height; 42.5 kg body weight), and body mass index (BMI) 20.5 kg/m2, underwent C-section under general anesthesia for abruptio placentae. Written informed consent was obtained for publication of the case. The patient had associated gestational diabetes; preeclampsia, treated with magnesium sulfate maintenance infusion at 1 g/h after loading infusion at 4 g/20 min; and hypertension, which was being treated with oral nifedipine 20 mg, the last dose of which was taken 5 h before anesthesia induction. Magnesium sulfate infusion was stopped 10 min before anesthesia induction. Its serum concentration was 4.4 mg/dl, measured about 6 h before anesthesia induction, which was within the target concentration for preeclampsia (4.2–8.4 mg/dl [9]) during maintenance of infusion. Before anesthesia induction, a neuromuscular transmission mechanosensor incorporated in the neuromuscular transmission module (Datex-Ohmeda S/5, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the tips of the left thumb and left index finger; electrodes were attached for stimulating the left ulnar nerve. Neuromuscular monitoring was started with automatic calibration before rocuronium administration. Before rocuronium administration, the train-of-four (TOF) ratio was 1.0. General anesthesia was induced with propofol 100 mg and rocuronium 40 mg (0.94 mg/kg in actual body weight). Laryngoscopy yielded Cormack and Lehane grade 1 view, and the trachea was intubated 40 s after rocuronium administration (TOF count 0). Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1.0–1.5%, remifentanil 0.1–0.2 mcg/kg/min, and fentanyl 200 mcg, without maintenance with rocuronium. The post-tetanic count (PTC) was 0 postoperatively, 95 min after the induction dose of rocuronium was administered. PTC was performed after an interval of at least 2 min on the monitoring setting. We also used another neuromuscular monitoring method for comparison to detect monitoring failure: the accelerometer of a TOF Watch® (Nippon Koden Co., Tokyo, Japan) attached to the tip of the right thumb with a hand adaptor; electrodes were attached for stimulating the right ulnar nerve. We could not calibrate the TOF Watch®, as there were no muscle contractions. Sugammadex 200 mg (4.7 mg/kg in actual body weight) was administered when PTC 2 was confirmed, 163 min after administration of the induction dose of rocuronium. Atropine 0.5 mg and neostigmine 1.0 mg were administered when the TOF ratio was 0.7, 9 min after sugammadex administration. TOF ratio exceeded 0.9 at 15 min after sugammadex administration. Sevoflurane was turned off 5 min after atropine and neostigmine administration, and the trachea was extubated. The patient recovered uneventfully.

Discussion

In our case, prolonged neuromuscular blockade and insufficient reversal of neuromuscular blockade were probably due to ongoing treatment with a high loading dose of magnesium 94 mg/kg, or the combination of magnesium sulfate with a calcium antagonist.

The trachea was intubated 40 s after rocuronium administration, which is a short interval. In the emergency department setting, the mean time to onset of paralysis was observed to be 45 s with a mean rocuronium dose of 1.0 mg/kg [10]. Prior administration of magnesium sulfate in non-pregnant patients did not increase the speed of onset of action of rocuronium in a study [2], but reduced the onset time in another [11].

The incidence of failed intubation in pregnant patients has been reported to be high (1 in 300) [12]. Good intubating conditions after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg administration are not always achieved in patients undergoing C-section under general anesthesia [1, 13]. Rocuronium bromide 1 mg/kg can be safely used for rapid sequential induction in C-sections [14]. The correct dose of rocuronium for rapid sequential induction in an obstetric patient has been suggested as 1.0 mg/kg [15]. The lower the BMI, the shorter the duration of recovery from rocuronium-induced blockade at the initial and additional doses determined by the actual body weight in adult patients with BMI less than 25  kg/ m2 [16]. Thus, administration of rocuronium at 0.94 mg/kg seemed appropriate in our patient with a BMI of 20.5 kg/m2.

Rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade is known to last about 1.1 times (45.7 min vs 40.6 min) longer in women in their second trimester compared to non-pregnant women [17]. Rocuronium 0.9–1.2 mg/kg has a duration of action of approximately 60 min, which is acceptable for C-section [11]. However, in our patient, in whom rocuronium 0.94 mg/kg was administered, the time to achieve PTC 2 was 163 min, which may not be acceptable for a surgical time of 95 min. In patients with diseases such as cirrhosis [18] or renal failure [19], recovery from rocuronium-induced blockade is prolonged; however, our patient did not have any of these conditions.

Magnesium sulfate has been shown to prolong the total time to recovery from a rocuronium-induced blockade by about 25% [11] and 60% [14] in non-pregnant patients. Magnesium sulfate 30 mg/kg accelerated the onset and improved operating conditions of low-dose rocuronium without prolongation of action [4]. Pre-treatment with magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg did not significantly affect the recovery time of moderate neuromuscular blockade facilitated by sugammadex [6]. Rapid administration of an intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate 60 mg/kg injected before rocuronium had no influence on the speed of onset but significantly prolonged the neuromuscular block [2]. In the experimental setting, administration of magnesium 87 mg/kg caused the twitch height to decrease to 33% of the baseline value [3]. Loading infusion of magnesium sulfate 94 mg/kg in our patient could have led to prolonged time to recovery from the neuromuscular block.

Calcium-antagonists can potentiate the toxicity of magnesium considerably [20], which may enhance the effects of muscle relaxants [21]. By contrast, one study reported no clinically significant interaction between magnesium sulfate and calcium-antagonists among women with suspected preeclampsia, particularly with respect to neuromuscular weakness or other serious magnesium sulfate-related adverse effects [8]. In another study, in a woman receiving magnesium sulfate and a calcium-antagonist and undergoing C-section under general anesthesia, prolonged and deep neuromuscular blockade induced by vecuronium (6 mg) was antagonized 3 h later with neostigmine [7].

Sufficiently large doses of sugammadex (more than about 1 mg/kg) eliminate the possibility of muscle relaxation rebound [22]. However, in a case report of an obese pregnant patient, sugammadex 2.3 mg/kg failed to reverse neuromuscular blockade [23]. Pre-treatment with magnesium sulfate did not significantly affect the time for a sugammadex-mediated reversal of moderate blockade induced by rocuronium [6]. However, after raising the magnesium concentration of the buffer by 3.5 to 4.1 mmol/L (resulting in a decrease of twitch height to 65% of baseline values), much higher concentrations of sugammadex were required to reverse the block [3]. Reversal of rocuronium-induced blockade by sugammadex is influenced by the degree of the residual blockade at the time the reversal drug is administered [24]. TOF ratio over 0.9 was achieved finally 15 min after administration of sufficiently large doses of sugammadex in our patient because higher rocuronium levels might have been present in the circulating blood and other compartments. We chose atropine and neostigmine because we had already administered sufficiently large doses of sugammadex and the TOF ratio was 0.7 [25].

Succinylcholine remains the neuromuscular blocking drug of choice for obstetric anesthesia because of its rapid onset and short duration of action [26]. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of a combination of rocuronium and sugammadex can increase the safety and quality of care in obstetric patients; thus, the use of succinylcholine in C-sections might no longer be indicated [27].

One of the limitations in our approach to the case was those serum concentrations of rocuronium and magnesium sulfate was not measured during the prolonged blockade; the concentrations of the drugs could have played an important role in the prolongation of neuromuscular blockade.

In conclusion, caution must be exercised when administering high doses of magnesium sulfate treatment relative to body weights in combination with a calcium-antagonist, as it may prolong neuromuscular blockade and cause an insufficient reversal in pregnant women.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage for English language editing.

Funding

No funding declared.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current report.

Authors’ contributions

MK anesthetized the patient, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final version. KK supervised the anesthesia, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate are not applicable to this article.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Abouleish E, Abboud T, Lechevalier T, Zhu J, Chalian A, Alford K. Rocuronium (org 9426) for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:336–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kussman B, Shorten G, Uppington J, Comunale ME. Administration of magnesium sulphate before rocuronium: effects on speed of onset and duration of neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bom A, Hope F, Rutherford S, Thomson K. Preclinical pharmacology of sugammadex. J Crit Care. 2009;24:29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi ES, Jeong WJ, Ahn SH, Oh AY, Jeon YT, Do SH. Magnesium sulfate accelerates the onset of low-dose rocuronium in patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017;36:102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pühringer FK, Rex C, Sielenkämper AW, Claudius C, Larsen PB, Prins ME, et al. Reversal of profound, high-dose rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex at two different time points: an international, multicenter, randomized, dose-finding, safety assessor-blinded, phase II trial. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Germano Filho PA, Cavalcanti IL, Barrucand L, Verçosa N. Effect of magnesium sulphate on sugammadex reversal time for neuromuscular blockade: a randomised controlled study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:956–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berdai MA, Labib S, Harandou M. Prolonged neuromuscular block in a preeclamptic patient induced by magnesium sulfate. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;25:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magee LA, Miremadi S, Li J, Cheng C, Ensom MH, Carleton B, et al. Therapy with both magnesium sulfate and nifedipine does not increase the risk of serious magnesium-related maternal side effects in women with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Euser AG, Cipolla MJ. Magnesium sulfate treatment for the prevention of eclampsia: a brief review. Stroke. 2009;40:1169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, Panacek EA. Rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation of emergency department patients. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:611–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Czarnetzki C, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramèr MR. Time course of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block after pre-treatment with magnesium sulphate: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Clavisi OM, Scott KL. ANZCA trials group. Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17:292–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pühringer FK, Kristen P, Rex C. Sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in caesarean section patients: a series of seven cases. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:657–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abu-Halaweh SA, Massad IM, Abu-Ali HM, Badran IZ, Barazangi BA, Ramsay MA. Rapid sequence induction and intubation with 1 mg/kg rocuronium bromide in cesarean section, comparison with suxamethonium. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1393–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McGuigan PJ, Shields MO, McCourt KC. Role of rocuronium and sugammadex in rapid sequence induction in pregnancy. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:418–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takahata O, Takahoko KI, Sasakawa T, Inagaki Y, Takahoko H, Kunisawa T. Duration of the action of rocuronium in patients with BMI of less than 25. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:863–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jun IJ, Jun J, Kim EM, Lee KY, Kim N, Chung MH, et al. Comparison of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in second trimester pregnant women and non-pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018;34:10–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khalil M, D'Honneur G, Duvaldestin P, Slavov V, De Hys C, Gomeni R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with cirrhosis. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:1241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson EN, Driessen JJ, Booij LH. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with and without renal failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Snyder SW, Cardwell MS. Neuromuscular blockade with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:35–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    James MF. Magnesium in obstetric anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eleveld DJ, Kuizenga K, Proost JH, Wierda JM. A temporary decrease in twitch response during reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation with a small dose of sugammadex. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:582–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kayashima K, Sozen R, Okura D. Insufficient sugammadex effect in an obese pregnant woman undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 2014;63:188–90.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    White PF, Tufanogullari B, Sacan O, Pavlin EG, Viegas OJ, Minkowitz HS, et al. The effect of residual neuromuscular blockade on the speed of reversal with sugammadex. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:846–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kopman AF. Neostigmine versus sugammadex: which, when, and how much? Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1010–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rollins M, Lucero J. Overview of anesthetic considerations for cesarean delivery. Br Med Bull. 2012;101:105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carlos RV, Torres MLA, de Boer HD. Is there still an indication for the use of succinylcholine in cesarean section? The answer is no. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017;67:552–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia, Japan Community Health Care OrganizationKyushu HospitalFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations