Reconstruction of the orbital wall using superior orbital rim osteotomy in a patient with a superior orbital wall fracture
- 210 Downloads
Fractures of the orbital wall are mainly caused by traffic accidents, assaults, and falls and generally occur in men aged between 20 and 40 years. Complications that may occur after an orbital fracture include diplopia and decreased visual acuity due to changes in orbital volume, ocular depression due to changes in orbital floor height, and exophthalmos. If surgery is delayed too long, tissue adhesion will occur, making it difficult to improve ophthalmologic symptoms. Thus, early diagnosis and treatment are important. Fractures of the superior orbital wall are often accompanied by skull fractures. Most of these patients are unable to perform an early ocular evaluation due to neurosurgery and treatment. These patients are more likely to show tissue adhesion, making it difficult to properly dissect the tissue for wall reconstruction during surgery.
This report details a case of superior orbital wall reconstruction using superior orbital rim osteotomy in a patient with a superior orbital wall fracture involving severe tissue adhesion. Three months after reconstruction, there were no significant complications.
In a patient with a superior orbital wall fracture, our procedure is helpful in securing the visual field and in delamination of the surrounding tissue.
KeywordsSuperior orbital wall reconstruction Tissue adhesion Diplopia
Fractures of the superior orbital wall are relatively rare compared to other facial fractures, and traffic accidents, assault, and falls have been reported as the main causes of such fractures [1, 2, 3, 4]. Resulting from these causes, fractures of the superior orbital wall are usually accompanied by other head and facial fractures and occur most commonly with fractures of the frontal bone and the other orbital wall [2, 4]. Though the management of an orbital superior wall fracture is usually performed without surgical treatment in cases with minimal displacement of the fracture fragment, early surgical reconstruction is necessary if the displacement of the fracture fragment is severe and ophthalmologic or neurological symptoms appear [5, 6]. However, if the patient’s general condition is poor or neurosurgical procedures take priority, reconstructive surgery should be performed after these other problems have been resolved.
In patients with fractures of the orbital wall with skull fracture, early ocular evaluation is often not performed due to the prioritization of neurosurgical procedures and treatment. Patients who undergo delayed surgery due to neurosurgical treatment develop tissue adhesion, making it difficult to properly dissect the tissue for the reconstruction of the orbital wall during surgery. This case demonstrates a successful orbital reconstruction through a superior orbital rim osteotomy in a patient with severe tissue adhesions and is reported along with a review of the literature.
In the left superior orbital wall fracture where the tissue adhesion was not severe, tissue dissection was completed without an osteotomy of the superior orbital wall rim. The titanium mesh was placed and fixed through conventional methods. After fixation of the fracture fragment, which had been obtained from the craniotomy site, the surgical site was closed.
We could confirm the improvement of the exophthalmos immediately following surgery (Fig. 4d) as the CT scan taken immediately after the operation showed that the brain parenchyma that had been protruding into the orbit returned to its normal position (Fig. 1c). Postoperative diplopia and exophthalmos were improved, and the patient was discharged without complications. At 3 months after surgery, further improvements in diplopia and exophthalmos with no limitation of ocular motility were found (Fig. 2b, d).
The treatment of an orbital wall fracture does not require surgery when there is no or minimal displacement of the fracture, but surgical treatment is necessary if ocular or neurologic symptoms accompany the displacement. Known ophthalmic complications include blindness, ocular motility limitations, diplopia, decreased visual acuity, exophthalmos, and ocular depression. Neurological complications include headache, brain damage, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage .
In the present case, there were no ophthalmologically significant symptoms immediately after the injury, but the patient complained of diplopia after undergoing an open reduction and internal fixation of the depressed temporal bone. This suggests that the elevated intracranial pressure after brain surgery may have led to both the displacement of the fracture fragment into the orbit and the herniation of the brain parenchyma. Similarly, in a previous report, ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with orbital wall defects was reported to cause enophthalmos . It is thought that the orbital contents herniated into the intracranial space due to decreased intracranial pressure after surgery, and the symptoms improved after reconstructing the orbital wall. Therefore, it should be noted that even if there are no significant ocular symptoms and neurological symptoms, there is a possibility that orbital reconstruction may become necessary after neurosurgery.
When a fracture fragment is significantly displaced and associated with ophthalmologic and neurological symptoms, it is ideal to perform surgery as early as possible, ideally immediately after the injury occurs. Early reconstructive surgery can prevent additional or persistent orbital contents or brain damage, is less likely to result in infection by reconstructive materials, and is less likely to cause severe tissue adhesion, as observed in this case [9, 10]. Early reconstruction has also been reported to prevent the worsening of both ophthalmic and neurological complications [11, 12]. When the patient is generally in good condition following injury, it is advisable to perform orbital reconstruction at the same time as neurosurgery.
In addition to the timing of surgery, anatomic reconstruction is one of the important considerations in the management of orbital wall fractures. In this case, we reconstructed the superior orbital wall using a customized titanium mesh that was prepared using a skull model preoperatively. When reconstruction is performed without a customized titanium mesh, it may be difficult to do anatomic reconstruction during surgery. In addition, improperly positioned reconstruction material may pressurize structures passing through the optic nerve or superior orbital fissure and may require additional surgery. In order to solve this problem, a titanium mesh can be contoured preoperatively to be suitable for each individual patient using the patient’s skull model [13, 14]. However, a limitation of this approach is that operations that rely on the patient’s skull model to preoperatively contour the mesh for reconstruction cannot be performed immediately, because it takes time to prepare a skull model using CT and the titanium mesh.l
In patients with orbital wall fractures, it is optimal to perform reconstruction of the orbital wall as early as possible using customized reconstructive materials. However, due to various limitations, tissue adhesion often occurs when the operation is delayed after injury, resulting in difficulties during surgery. In this patient, we used a method to remove the superior orbital rim that resulted in the successful dissection of the tissue and reconstruction of the orbital wall. This method can be used more frequently in future patients with severe tissue adhesion.
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
JJHeo wrote the manuscript. JHC, JJHan, and SJ helped in the drafting of the manuscript. MSK and HKO were involved in the revising of the manuscript. HJP carefully reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The patient consented to the publication of this case report.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.