Transient ionization of the mesosphere during auroral breakup: Arase satellite and ground-based conjugate observations at Syowa Station
KeywordsAurora Mesosphere X-rays Energetic electrons
High-energy electron experiments
The Program of the Antarctic Syowa Mesosphere Stratosphere Troposphere Incoherent Scatter Radar
Particle and heavy ion transport code system
Extremely high-energy electron experiment
Significant ionization of the mesosphere has long been documented during substorms. One of the most prominent phenomena is found near the onset and is referred to as “absorption spikes,” which are observed by ground-based riometers (Parthasarathy and Berkey 1965; Nielsen and Axford 1977). The absorption spike events are found in a vast majority of substorms (Hargreaves et al. 1997; Aminaei et al. 2006; Spanswick et al. 2006) and are often associated with energetic electron bursts in the inner magnetosphere (Baker et al. 1981; Kremser et al. 1982; 1988). In pulsating auroras, the mesospheric ionization is due to the precipitation of energetic electrons of a few hundred keV (Brown et al. 1976; Sandahl et al. 1980; Miyoshi et al. 2015; Oyama et al. 2017). Atmospheric ionization that results from this energetic particle precipitation in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere plays an essential role in linking the space and terrestrial environments via the generation of odd nitrogen and odd hydrogen (Codrescu et al. 1997; Daae et al. 2012; Isono et al. 2014; Seppala et al. 2015; Tomikawa 2017), and, thus, it is important to quantitatively evaluate the fundamental factors that lead to such deep ionization scenarios to understand its mechanisms and characteristics better.
In 2017, the Arase satellite began full in situ observation of energetic particles and electromagnetic waves in the inner magnetosphere in an effort to understand the dynamics of radiation belts and the inner magnetosphere better (Miyoshi et al. 2018). The energetic particles precipitating from the inner magnetosphere deposit their energy in the atmosphere, and this is improving our understanding of the associated atmospheric response, which has also been an important objective of the Arase satellite project.
The Program of the Antarctic Syowa Mesosphere Stratosphere Troposphere Incoherent Scatter Radar (PANSY) at Syowa Station, in the Antarctic (− 69.00°S, 39.58°E; − 70.46° magnetic latitude) has been in operation continuously since September 2015 at an observation frequency of 47 MHz (Sato et al. 2014). It is accompanied by a suite of important ground-based instruments, including a high-speed auroral imager, a meridian scanning photometer, and imaging riometer. The PANSY radar system detects polar mesosphere winter echoes, which are caused by neutral turbulence in the weakly ionized atmosphere at an altitude of 55–85 km (Czechowsky et al. 1989; Brattli et al. 2006; Lübken et al. 2007). Recent observations revealed that the sudden intensification of mesospheric echoes around 65 km was caused by electron density enhancements in the D region during a solar proton event (Nishiyama et al. 2018), implying that intensified mesospheric echoes may serve as a proxy of electron density variations at mesospheric altitudes.
There have been several occasions when the ionospheric footprint of the Arase satellite has passed through the field of view of the all-sky auroral imagers in operation at Syowa Station. As expected, the Arase satellite, PANSY radar, and other ground-based conjugate instruments simultaneously observed an isolated substorm at Syowa Station on June 30, 2017. The purpose of this study is to report on a rare comprehensive data set from these cutting-edge conjugate observation instruments and discuss the transient mesospheric ionization associated with auroral breakup, combined with a general-purpose Monte Carlo particle transport simulation code particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS). In this study, the EGS5 mode (Hirayama et al. 2005) in PHITS version 3.02 (Sato et al. 2018) was employed.
Interestingly, the echo was also enhanced at an altitude of 65–70 km as the auroral breakup began from 2220 to 2226 UT, regardless of the dominant presence of low-energy auroral electrons. It is not possible to rule out the possible role of the direct injection of > 100 keV energetic electrons, even if the auroral electrons were predominantly soft, because the flux of such energetic electrons would be significantly lower than the auroral electrons, and their impact on the auroral emission is negligible.
More specifically, the echo enhancements at altitudes < 70 km were confirmed at only two successive time intervals, specifically 22:21:26–22:22:47 UT and 22:24:44–22:26:05 UT. In the next time frame of 22:28:02–22:29:23 UT, the echo enhancement disappeared at altitudes < 70 km. The signals were clearer at the zenith, and in south/east beams (i.e., poleward beams) compared with those associated with the north/west beams, where auroral emission is also intensified, which was observed in all-sky images (Additional file 1: Movie A1). The altitude range of the transient echo enhancement was found to be broader than the narrow echo band noted during the pulsating auroras.
Broadband noise was observed during the auroral breakup from ~ 2220 to 2230 UT, while continuum emissions from the plasmapause were observed during the pulsating auroras from ~ 2230 to 2400 UT. Note that the Arase satellite traversed across the plasmapause at L = 6.6 at ~ 2150 UT, which was also detected by HFA (not shown), implying that this event was observed just outside the plasmapause. The Arase satellite did not observe electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves nor chorus waves during the 2-h event.
The mesospheric ionization is quantitatively evaluated using PHITS (Sato et al. 2018). The following hypothesis is proposed as an explanation for the transient ionization of the mesosphere. Note that X-rays are emitted from the soft auroral electrons of < 10 keV by bremsstrahlung emission at an altitude of ~ 100 km, and these X-rays can penetrate deep into the mesosphere and deposit their energy. Altitude profiles of the local auroral energy deposition due to electrons and X-rays can be calculated by well-established methods (Rees 1964; Berger and Seltzer 1972; Luhmann 1977). In this paper, we use PHITS (Sato et al. 2018) to simulate three ionization models, including the auroral breakup model A (soft electrons and high flux), the pulsating aurora model B (hard electrons and low flux), and the energetic electron model C. In this study, the MSISE-90 model (Hedin 1991) was employed for simulating the neutral atmosphere over Syowa Station at 2200 UT on June 30, 2017.
Then, the resultant riometer response was calculated to quantitatively test the above hypothesis. We calculated the cosmic noise absorption by the formulation of 4.6 × 10−5 νω−2 q0.5 a−0.5 dB m−1, where q is the ion pair production rate. The recombination coefficient a was obtained from Gledhill (1986), and the collision frequency ν was obtained from Aggarwal et al. (1979). The observation frequency ω of the riometer was 38.2 MHz. The height integrated intensities of cosmic noise absorption were estimated to be only 0.016 dB and 0.005 dB for models A and B, respectively, which are an order of magnitude smaller than the observed values, as shown in Fig. 3. From the above results, we expect an order of magnitude larger ionization than those of the soft and hard auroral electrons to take place in the mesosphere during the event investigated in this study.
The result of the PHITS simulation for model C is represented by the black lines in Fig. 5b. Comparing model C to models A and B, ionization that was 2–3 orders of magnitude larger was obtained at an altitude of 50–80 km. The integrated cosmic noise absorption intensity of model C was 0.053 dB, which represents a more reasonable value to explain the riometer observations. Additional contributions from the omitted populations of less energetic electrons < 100 keV, which cannot reach to a 65 km altitude, can fill the gap of simulated and observed cosmic noise absorption intensities. Based on the above PHITS simulations, we concluded that the precipitation of energetic electrons of > 100 keV, rather than X-rays from the auroral electrons, played a dominant role in the transient and deep mesospheric ionization during the auroral breakup.
The possible cause of the precipitation of energetic electrons is discussed as follows. The possible pitch angle scattering of energetic electrons > 100 keV from the inner magnetosphere is generally attributed to either electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves or chorus waves (e.g., Miyoshi et al. 2008, 2015). However, the Arase satellite did not observe electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves or chorus waves. In general, electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves should be found in the equatorial region. By contrast, the resonance energy of chorus waves depends on the off-equatorial magnetic latitude in the magnetosphere, and even MeV electrons can precipitate into the atmosphere when the chorus waves propagate at higher latitudes (Horne and Thorne 2003; Miyoshi et al. 2015). It is also possible that during this particular event the Arase satellite was not in the correct position to observe the chorus wave activity. Meredith et al. (2012) conducted a statistical survey of chorus waves using multiple satellites and found that between magnetic latitudes of 15°–30° on the nightside, chorus intensities drop off significantly compared to those in the equatorial region. Chorus waves that reach higher latitudes were found to be restricted to dayside. Thus, it is possible that the Arase satellite was outside of the region where one would expect to see the chorus waves or electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves.
Finally, we briefly discuss the transient timescale of the appearance and disappearance of the echo, as shown in Fig. 2. Note that both the horizontal and vertical appearance and disappearance of radar echoes in the wintertime mesosphere have been known to depend on a complex interplay of both ionizing sources and possibly turbulence, in addition to non-ionizing radiation, such as daylight, ion-chemistry and the charging behavior of dust or smoke layers (Kirkwood 2007; Lübken et al. 2006; Kirkwood et al. 2015; Nishiyama et al. 2018). It is important to note that during the present spike event the deep ionization disappeared rather quickly. At a nighttime altitude of 65 km, the recombination rate was 10−9 m3 s−1 (Friedrich et al. 2004), and the electron density from the results of model C was on the order of 107 m−3. Therefore, the timescale is ~ 102 s, which is consistent with the spike appearance. However, the estimated electron density at 65 km was not large enough by itself to generate detectable mesospheric echoes (Lübken et al. 2006; Nishiyama et al. 2018). Therefore, the observed transient echo seems to have been caused by ionization due to electron precipitations and strong neutral turbulence and/or meteor smoke particles. Unfortunately, we have no mesospheric wind information during this period, and a vertical wind profile behind the echo layer cannot be examined. Ion-chemistry, including charging behavior of meteor smoke particles, also plays an important role in forming mesospheric echo layers in the VHF range. Electron density variations related to dust and smoke particles, especially during geomagnetically disturbed periods, should be taken into account in future research efforts.
The transient mesospheric ionization was identified at an altitude of around 65–70 km over Syowa Station during the auroral breakup that occurred from 2220 to 2226 UT on June 30, 2017, when the footprint of the Arase satellite was located close to Syowa Station. Instruments onboard the Arase satellite observed the rapid flux enhancement of several hundred keV electrons at the same time. Such energetic electrons, which represent a different population from auroral electrons, precipitated to transiently ionize the deep mesosphere during the auroral breakup.
RK conducted the overall data analysis and prepared the manuscript. TN, YT, and AK provided their observational results of Syowa station. HAU, YE, and EKM helped the observation of high-speed imager at Syowa station. YT, MT, and KS helped the interpretation of PANSY data. YM, KS, SK, YK, MO, KH, SM, IS, TT, TH, NH, and TM helped the interpretation of Arase data. TS conducted PHITS simulation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
RK thanks Y. Hirasima and H. Yamagishi for the discussions about auroral X-rays. The authors thank M. Shoji and R. Nomura for their efforts to create the EMIC database of the Arase satellite. Gratitude is also due to F. Tsuchiya and A. Kumamoto for providing the electron density data of the Arase satellite. PANSY is a multi-institutional project with a core comprising the University of Tokyo and National Institute of Polar Research. The PANSY radar is operated by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE). Observations at Syowa Station were carried out by JARE-58. The authors are also grateful all the members of JARE-58. The preparation of this paper was supported by an NIPR publication subsidy.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The present study used the PWE/HFA data of v03, PWE/OFA-SPEC L2 data v01.01, MGF-L2-v01.00, and XEP L2-omniflux v00_00. HEP L2-omniflux v01_02. Science data of the ERG (Arase) satellite were obtained from the ERG Science Center operated by ISAS/JAXA and ISEE/Nagoya University (http://ergsc.isee.nagoya-u.ac.jp/). The Arase satellite data will be publicly available via ERG Science Center on a project-agreed schedule. The PANSY radar observation data are available upon request (contact: Kaoru Sato). These data were downloaded and analyzed using the SPEDAS software (http://spedas.org) with the IUGONET and ERG plugins. The redistribution of the ground-based observational data has been supported by the IUGONET (Inter-university Upper atmosphere Global Observation NETwork) project (http://www.iugonet.org/).
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
RK and YM are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (15H05815). RK, KS, MO, and YM are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (16H06286). RK, AK, and YT are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (15H02628). YK is supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (16H04056). SM is supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (14J02108). IS is supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (17H06140). KH and YM are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (15H05747).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Hargreaves JK, Browne S, Ranta H, Ranta A, Rosenberg TJ, Detrick DL (1997) A study of substorm-associated nightside spike events in auroral absorption using imaging riometers at South Pole and Kilpisjarvi. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 59(8):853–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(96)00061-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirayama H, Namito Y, Bielajew AF, Wilderman SJ, Nelson WR (2005) The EGS5 code system, SLAC-R-730 and KEK report 2005-8. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, TsukubaGoogle Scholar
- Kasaba Y, Ishisaka K, Kasahara Y, Imachi T, Yagitani S, Kojima H, Matsuda S, Shoji M, Kurita S, Hori T, Shinbori A, Teramoto M, Miyoshi Y, Nakagawa T, Takahashi N, Nishimura Y, Matsuoka A, Kumamoto A, Tsuchiya F, Nomura R (2017) Wire probe antenna (WPT) and Electric field detector (EFD) of plasma wave experiment (PWE) aboard Arase: specifications and initial evaluation results. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0760-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kasahara Y, Kasaba Y, Kojima H, Yagitani S, Ishisaka K, Kumamoto A, Tsuchiya F, Ozaki M, Matsuda S, Imachi T, Miyoshi Y, Hikishima M, Katoh Y, Ota M, Shoji M, Matsuoka A, Shinohara I (2018) The plasma wave experiment (PWE) on board the Arase (ERG) satellite. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0842-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumamoto A, Tsuchiya F, Kasahara Y, Kasaba Y, Kojima H, Yagitani S, Ishisaka K, Imachi T, Ozaki M, Matsuda S, Shoji M, Matsuoka A, Katoh Y, Miyoshi Y, Obara T (2018) High frequency analyzer (HFA) of plasma wave experiment (PWE) onboard the Arase spacecraft. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0854-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matsuda S, Kasahara Y, Kojima H, Kasaba Y, Yagitani S, Ozaki M, Imachi T, Ishisaka K, Kumamoto A, Tsuchiya F, Ota M, Kurita S, Miyoshi Y, Hikishima M, Matsuoka A, Shinohara I (2018) Onboard software of plasma wave experiment aboard Arase: instrument management and signal processing of waveform capture/onboard frequency analyzer. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0838-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi Y, Oyama S, Saito S, Kurita S, Fujiwara H, Kataoka R, Ebihara Y, Kletzing C, Reeves G, Santolik O, Clilverd M, Rodger CJ, Turunen E, Tsuchiya F (2015) Energetic electron precipitation associated with pulsating aurora: EISCAT and Van Allen Probe observations. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120:2754–2766. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi Y, Shinohara I, Takashima T, Asamura K, Higashio H, Mitani T, Kasahara S, Yokota S, Kazama Y, Wang S-Y, Tam S, Ho P, Kasahara Y, Kasaba Y, Yagitani S, Matsuoka A, Kojima H, Katoh Y, Shiokawa K, Seki K (2018) Geospace exploration project ERG. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0862-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama T, Sato K, Nakamura T, Tsutsumi M, Sato T, Kohma M, Nishimura K, Tomikawa Y, Ejiri MK, Tsuda TT (2015) Height and time characteristics of seasonal and diurnal variations in PMWE based on 1-year observations by the PANSY radar (69.0°S, 39.6°E). Geophys Res Lett 42:2100–2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama T, Sato K, Nakamura T, Tsutsumi M, Sato T, Tanaka Y, Nishimura K, Tomikawa Y, Kohma M (2018) Simultaneous observations of polar mesosphere winter echoes and cosmic noise absorptions in a common volume by the PANSY radar (69.0°S, 39.6°E). J Geophys Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA024717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ozaki M, Yagitani S, Kasahara Y, Kojima H, Kasaba Y, Kumamoto A, Tsuchiya F, Matsuda S, Matsuoka A, Sasaki T, Yumoto T (2018) Magnetic search coil (MSC) of plasma wave experiment (PWE) aboard the Arase (ERG) satellite. Earth Planets Space. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0837-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spanswick E, Donovan E, Liu W, Wallis D, Aasnes A, Hiebert T, Jackel B, Henderson M, Frey H (2006) Substorm associated spikes in high energy particle precipitation. In: Pulkkinen TI, Tsyganenko NA, Friedel RHW (eds) The inner magnetosphere: physics and modeling, vol 155. Geophysical monograph series. American Geophysical Union, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1029/155gm24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsyganenko NA (1996) Effects of the solar wind conditions on the global magnetospheric configuration as deduced from data-based field models. In: ESA SP-389. European Space Agency Publication, Paris, p 181Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.