Advertisement

Heritage Science

, 7:2 | Cite as

Colouring of Pacific barkcloths: identification of the brown, red and yellow colourants used in the decoration of historic Pacific barkcloths

  • T. H. Flowers
  • M. J. SmithEmail author
  • J. Brunton
Open Access
Research article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

Barkcloth textiles made in the Pacific islands and collected by western explorers in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries form part of many museum collections worldwide. Here high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) were used on cloths that were highly coloured or pigmented specifically focussing on identifying the red, yellow and brown colorants. The cloths studied came from collections held at the Hunterian, University of Glasgow, the Economic Botany Collection, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and the Centre for Textile Conservation and Technical Art History, University of Glasgow. HPLC analysis was carried out following a sequential extraction procedure to minimise changes to the colorants during extraction. A portable XRF was used so no invasive sampling was required. A small number of plant derived colorants were found, Morinda citrifolia, noni (morindin or morindone), Rubia tinctorum (madder), tree tannins and Curcuma longa (turmeric) plus an inorganic colorant, iron oxide. For 40 samples a single colorant was found while in the remaining 12 samples combinations of up to three colorants were found. Madder was found in only 2 samples on the same cloth. The morindone coloured samples were all red whereas morindin samples were both red and yellow. Morindin was used predominantly in combination with other colouring agents. A combination of iron ochre and organic colorant was found in 4 samples. These findings show that despite the numerous potential colorant sources for red, brown and yellow shades listed in the many accounts of historic barkcloth making, only five types of plant colourant and one inorganic pigment were found. There are a number of potential reasons for these findings. Some colours may have faded and so no longer appear coloured. It is also possible that, as some of these cloths were prepared specifically as gifts for visitors or for ceremonial uses, the makers used materials that they knew would retain their integrity over time. Perhaps, like artisans worldwide, experience had taught them that some colorants, although initially bright and vivid, faded over time.

Keywords

Pacific barkcloth Pigments Dyes HPLC XRF Colorants Identification 

Abbreviations

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

XRF

X-ray fluorescence

MS

mass spectrometer

LC–MS

liquid chromatography mass spectrometer

UV–visible

ultra violet–visible

HCl

hydrochloric acid

M

molar

Introduction

Barkcloth (tapa) is one of the most distinctive products of cultures originating from the Pacific islands. Barkcloth is a non-woven material made from beaten inner bark and often referred to as a bast fibre. Tapa production was central to providing clothing and bedding, as well as for decoration and ceremonial purposes [1]. The name tapa, now a universal term for Pacific barkcloth, derives from the Samoan term tapa for the uncoloured border of a piece of barkcloth. In Hawaii kappa describes a range of different types of barkcloth. Tapa is constructed from different types of plant, most commonly Broussonetia papyrifera (paper mulberry), Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit), Ficus prolia (banyan) or Pipturis albidus (mamaki), producing a matted, strong and fibrous structure, beaten to resemble a paper-like material or textile. Varied approaches to making tapa are noted within different Pacific cultures, but these are variations based on a central methodology [2].

Traditionally, the colourants used to dye plain barkcloth were obtained from plants, trees and earth pigments. When different cultures met through trading, especially in the Tonga–Fiji–Samoa region, different patterns on barkcloth became identifiers of where they originated. The arrival of missionaries and other Westerners during the nineteenth century saw a change in the materials used to produce barkcloth, with imported materials sometimes used.

Whilst the number of different types of plants recorded as being used to provide differing colours is large and varied [3] the literature on the analysis of the various types of dyes found to be present in backcloths remains narrow [4, 5]. A comprehensive review on the materials used in barkcloth production by Larson [6] listed only a few sources of plant colorants and inorganic pigments as commonly used. There has been very little scientific analysis carried out on the colourants on these cloths excepting work by Bisulca et al. [4] and the published literature on the materials used and their manufacture for the most part comes from historic accounts of early missionaries or explorers. Research carried out to determine the colorants used on Hawaiian barkcloth noted that there are over 10 plant species documented as historic red dyestuffs, however from the barkcloth pieces analysed for red colouring all came from noni (Morinda citrifolia). In cases where the red design was not organic, the red colourant was found to be an iron oxide pigment [4].

The findings presented here focus on the analysis of organic and inorganic colourants used on cloths and detail extraction protocols which minimise damage to colorants under study and also reduce the number of steps used in the process. In this study cloths from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries from 3 collections are used to determine the variation and/or similarities of these colourants by carrying out analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) on cloths that were highly coloured or pigmented specifically focussing on identifying the red, yellow and brown colorants.

Materials and methods

Barkcloths

The 54 historic cloths analysed came from three collections, The Hunterian, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (33), the Economic Botany Collection (EBC), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, (16) and a sample book at the Centre for Textile Conservation and Technical Art History, University of Glasgow (5). These are detailed in Table 1. The Hunterian acquired its collection from several collectors including William Hunter who acquired barkcloths collected during Captain Cook’s voyages during the 1760 s and 1770 s. Alexander Angus donated a collection of Hawaiian and Tahitian cloths in 1810 and George Turner lived in Samoa for many years from 1841 and donated his collection. The EBC barkcloths came from a number of donors mainly in the second half of the nineteenth century. A sample book at the CTCTAH states on the first page that the samples within it were ‘collected during the three voyages of Captain Cook to the Southern Hemisphere’ which took place between 1768 and 1780. It consists of 30 samples of various types of cloths. The origins of the cloths given in Table 1 are based on current curatorial records of each collection.
Table 1

Details of the size, descriptions and areas of backcloths sampled

Accession number

Origin (tentative)

Length (mm)

Width (mm)

Description (mm)

Colours sampled HPLC

Colours sampled XRF

CTCTAH sample book

CTCSB2016 No.10

Tahiti

209

131

Plain yellow

Yellow

 

CTCSB2016 No.18

Tahiti

89

52

Red/yellow/black pattern

Yellow

CTCSB2016 No.20

Hawaii

71

54

Plain red

Red

CTCSB2016 No.23

Tahiti

200

128

Plain red

Red

CTCSB2016 No. 29

Tonga

67

49

Red/yellow/black pattern

Yellow

Hunterian museum

E417/2

Samoa

2150

1865

Black/yellow pattern on undyed background

Yellow

 

E417/5

Fiji

2200

590

Black with red border

Red

E417/11

Tonga

1570

710

Red zigzags on black background

Red

Red

E457/3

Hawaii

1650

1350

Red and yellow stripes on undyed background

Yellow

 

E458/1

Samoa or Cook Islands

1840

900

Yellow/black pattern on undyed background

Yellow

 

E458/2

Hawaii

950

750

Thin red stripes on yellow background

Yellow

 

E458/3

Fiji

2120

1800

Brown line pattern on undyed background red/black border

Brown, red

 

E458/4

Tahiti or Marquesas Islands

3930

1480

Plain red-brown

Red-brown

 

E458/6

Tonga

3530

1580

Plain brown and brown/yellow pattern

Brown

 

E591/4

Polynesia

1220

950

Undyed cloth

Undyed

 

E594/2

Tahiti

1310

430

Undyed cloth

Undyed

 

E594/8

Tahiti

810

360

Undyed cloth

Undyed

 

E595

Tonga

2930

1590

Red with undyed spots

Red

Red

E595/1

Tahiti

1960

1090

Red pattern on yellow background

Red, yellow

 

E596/1

Tahiti or Hawaii

440

250

Undyed cloth

 

Undyed

E596/5

Tahiti

415

290

Undyed cloth

 

Undyed

E596/6

Tahiti

300

140

Undyed cloth

Undyed

 

E596/7

Fiji

1550

954

Undyed cloth

 

Undyed

E596/8

Tahiti

173

153

Undyed cloth

 

Undyed

E598/1

Hawaii

233

172

Red/yellow/black/undyed stripe pattern

Red, yellow

Red, yellow, undyed

E598/2

Hawaii

198

160

Red/black pattern

Red

Red

E598/3

Hawaii

443

113

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Red

E598/4

Hawaii

350

247

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Red

Hunterian museum

E599

Tahiti or Hawaii

1300

1050

Dark brown flaking coating

Dark brown

Dark brown, bare

E600

Tahiti or Hawaii

945

440

Red border stripe on undyed cloth

Red

Red, undyed

E601

Hawaii

910

755

Red, grey and undyed stripes

Red, undyed

 

E602

Hawaii

780

500

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red, yellow

Red, yellow

E603

Tahiti

1100

670

Plain red-brown cloth

Red-brown

 

E606

Cook Islands

522

175

Plain red and undyed blocks

Red, undyed

Red, undyed

E608

Tahiti

530

510

Plain yellow

Yellow

 

E610

Fiji

1545

890

Undyed cloth

 

Undyed

E611/3

Hawaii

2100

1200

Mottled grey

 

Grey

E667

Hawaii

990

860

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

 

Kew EBC

42853A

Hawaii

110

85

Plain red cloth

Red

Red

42861

Samoa

2340

950

Poncho red/black/undyed pattern

 

Red, undyed

42863

Samoa

2045

1950

Stripe and leaf pattern on undyed background

Red-brown, Yellow

 

42885H

Hawaii

560

230

Plain dark brown cloth

Dark brown

 

42947A

Hawaii

2190

955

Red handprints on yellow background

Red, yellow

 

42947B

Hawaii

1550

1340

Red stripes on yellow background

Red, yellow

Red, yellow

42958A

Hawaii

1760

1713

Red pattern on yellow background

Yellow

 

42958B

Hawaii

1350

1180

Brown and fine red pattern on undyed background

Brown, light brown

 

42958C

Hawaii

1374

938

Red leaf pattern on yellow background

Red, yellow

 

42965

Hawaii

2732

2117

Undyed cloth

Undyed

 

42966

Hawaii

3455

2340

Mottled red on undyded background

Red

 

42967

Hawaii

3308

2576

Red/purple mottles in triangular pattern

Red, purple

 

42979

South Sea Islands

1983

1905

Plain glossy red coating

Red

 

67802A

Unknown

159

133

Red/yellow stripe pattern

Red

Red

73329

Tahiti

2340

1570

Brown pattern/tassles on undyed background

Brown

 

98041

Unknown

2915

945

Plain red-brown

Red-brown

Red-brown

Extraction and HPLC analysis

Samples were taken from the edges of cloths or from damaged areas, from regions of uniform colour. Not all colours could be sampled if they did not appear at edges or the areas were too small or the cloths themselves were small. Depending on the availability of material 1–5 mg samples were used for HPLC analysis. Because the colorants frequently only lightly coat the surface of the barkcloth fibres the weight of cloth sampled is not a good indicator of the weight of dye present.

The extraction method was based on the findings of Wouters et al. [7] who investigated the use of mild extractants for textiles and paints to minimise changes to the dyes during extraction. Acetone was omitted from their mildest extractant (oxalic acid/methanol) to eliminate the need to evaporate the extract to dryness and redissolve to prevent interference in the UV detection by acetone. For more acidic extractions we substituted hydrofluoric acid–methanol with hydrochloric acid–methanol on safety grounds. A sequential extraction procedure was used to enable extractants of increasing acidity to be used with a single barkcloth sample.

The tapa sample (1–5 mg) was placed in a 500 µL polypropylene microcentrifuge tube and 250 µL of the initial extracting solution added. A small hole was made in the tube lid to prevent pressure build up and the tube placed in a water bath as follows. Extraction 1: 60% methanol 0.002 M oxalic acid 80 °C 20 min; Extraction 2: 50% methanol 0.1 M HCl 80 °C 20 min; Extraction 3: 50% methanol 1 M HCl 90 °C 30 min. After each extraction the extract was made back up to the nominal volume with the appropriate extracting solution and filtered through a 4 mm 0.2 µm Teflon syringe filter into a 300 µL fixed insert autosampler vial. A further 50 µL of extracting solution was used to rinse the tube and filter into the autosampler vial. The sample was then extracted with the next extracting solution.

Analysis was carried out using a gradient high pressure chromatography (HPLC) system with a UV diode array detector. The Merck-Hitachi HPLC system comprised: L-7200 autosampler, L-7100 gradient pump, Jones Chromatography Genesis C18 4 µm 250 by 4.6 mm column, L-7350 column oven, L-4500 diode array detector and L-7000 HPLC system manager software. The extracts were analysed using acetonitrile:water gradient elution (30% to 98% acetonitrile over 30 min) with 0.1% phosphoric acid (Table 2). Spectra were collected from 200 to 600 nm and a chromatogram extracted at 425 nm. Where tannins were present a second HPLC gradient was used (10% to 95% acetonitrile over 25 min) with 0.25% phosphoric (Table 2). Spectra were collected from 200 to 600 nm and a chromatogram extracted at 275 nm. 59 samples were tested from 47 cloths (Table 1).
Table 2

HPLC gradients

Time (min)

Water (%)

Acetonitrile (%)

5% H3PO4 (%)

HPLC gradient 1

0

68

30

2

25

0

98

2

30

0

98

2

30.1

68

98

2

35

68

98

2

HPLC gradient 2

0

85

10

5

25

0

95

5

25.1

85

10

5

30

85

10

5

Components were identified primarily on the basis of their UV–visible spectra and retention time. A subset of barkcloth sample extracts were analysed using a Shimadzu LC2010A HT LC system and LCMS2010EV Mass spectrometer HPLC–MS system using the same Genesis column and water:acetonitrile gradient 1 with 0.1% formic acid. UV detection was at 370 nm and MS detection was in negative ion mode to confirm the UV based component identity by the mass of the molecular ion. A soft ionisation was used to preserve the molecular ion.

Because of the scarcity of available standards to generate reference UV–visible spectra and retention times, an in-house spectrum library was generated using methanol extracts of plant materials. Peak identification was based on literature references of the major components present, their relative retention characteristics and their UV–visible data [5]. Confirmation of peak identity was obtained from the mass of the molecular ion using LC–MS.

XRF analysis

XRF analysis was carried out using a Niton XL3t GOLDD + handheld XRF in mining mode (Main range 15 s, Low range 15 s, High range 10 s, Light range 20 s). XRF analysis could be carried out anywhere on a cloth but required a uniform area with a minimum diameter of 4 mm. 28 samples (9 undyed controls, 19 dyed samples) were tested from 21 cloths (Table 1).

Results and discussion

HPLC

Seven very light yellow/brown barkcloth samples all yielded chromatograms with no peaks suggesting that this represents the varying colours of the undyed barkcloth. A further two similarly coloured samples showed the presence of turmeric. The 49 coloured samples where chromatographic peaks were obtained produced organic dyes from 4 plant sources: noni (Morinda citrifolia), turmeric (Curcuma longa), madder (Rubia tinctorum) and non-specific tannins. Identification of the plant sources was based on the presence of their major characteristic peaks. In the case of noni it is generally accepted that the presence of morindin and/or morindone is sufficient [5] even though the mixture of anthraquinones present as minor constituents may be more complex. Noni was found in two forms, dominated by either the glycoside morindin (Fig. 1a shows a typical chromatogram) or the aglycone morindone (Fig. 1b). Many of the anthraquinone plant dyes are present in the plant as glycosides where the coloured anthraquinone molecule is bound to one or more sugar molecules. During dye manufacture the glycosides can be hydrolysed by heat or acid or by the enzymes present in the plant extract. The noni based dyes (morindin and morindone) are naturally yellow but the colour is pH dependent, red above pH 10 [8], and burnt lime can be used to create a red dye [6]. Strongly acid extracting solutions can hydrolyse the glycosides releasing the aglycone anthraquinone and further degrade the molecule thus losing information on the exact nature of the dye molecule and the dye manufacturing process [9]. A review paper by Degano et al. [10] discusses the effects of acidic methanol used for the extraction of dyes in historic paint and textiles samples. Weaker acid extractions using oxalic acid or hydrofluoric acid have been recommended for paint samples to avoid hydrolysis of the dye molecules [7, 11]. The dyes used on barkcloths are frequently present as a surface coating on the barkcloth fibre without use of a mordant and are not strongly bound to the fibres. A weakly acid extracting solution can successfully extract many of the dyes while preserving the glycosides and the information they provide. A sequential extraction procedure with increasing acidity allow extraction of labile weakly bound dyes as well as the more strongly bound dyes.
Fig. 1

Typical chromatograms of barkcloth sample extracts. a Untreated noni; b treated noni; c turmeric

Fig. 2

Typical chromatograms of barkcloth sample extracts. a madder; b tannins using HPLC gradient 1; c tannins using HPLC gradient 2

The chromatogram of turmeric showed 3 characteristic peaks: bisdemethoxycurcumin, demethoxycurcumin and curcumin (Fig. 1c). Some cloths coloured with turmeric which had faded with age often appeared similar in colour to the undyed cloths but these 3 compounds could be detected. The madder chromatogram showed peaks for alizarin and purpurin (Fig. 2a). The tannins produced a broad shoulder on the injection noise at about 4 min (Fig. 2b) which was resolved into a broad peak at about 10 min using HPLC gradient 2 (Fig. 2c). In the 1 M HCl extracts there was some hydrolysis to produce anthocyanidins but it was not possible to fingerprint the plant source. A more detail examination of the tannins could perhaps be achieved by digesting the extracts to hydrolyse the tannins or by use of a different chromatographic column. Tamburini et al. [5] also used a C18 column but it has been reported that an amide column [12] might be more effective. This was, however, beyond the scope of this work.

Morindin, morindone, curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bis demethoxycurcumin and tannins were readily extracted in the first oxalic acid:methanol extraction. Alizarin and purpurin showed most clearly in the 0.1 M HCl:methanol and and M HCL:methanol extractions. UV–visible spectra of these components are shown in Fig. 3. The identity of these components was confirmed by HPLC–MS using the mass of the negatively charged molecular ion.
Fig. 3

UV–Vis spectra of a major noni components; b turmeric components; c madder components

The use of the milder method extraction 1 prevented the decomposition of glycosides allowing for a better understanding of the how these colourants were prepared for use. This suggests that the noni root was prepared in different ways for barkcloth decoration although no correlation to the island of origin was observable in this study. The ease of extraction of most of the colorants points to the lack of traditional metallic mordenting.

XRF

The results are shown in Table 3. Iron oxide was the only inorganic pigment detected and elevated titanium was associated with the high iron content. The 9 undyed control samples all showed low undetectable background Fe levels < 0.002%. Of the 19 coloured samples tested 13 were negative and 6 positive for iron. Of these 6 samples 4 also had an organic pigment present (2 tannin and 2 traces of turmeric) and only 1 contained iron alone. The poncho Kew 42861 (Fig. 5c) could not be sampled for HPLC extraction. Calcium was present in both coloured and uncoloured cloths up to 1.7%. These levels could be due to the manufacturing process where some cloths would have been polished using shells (calcium carbonate) or inherent in the bark fibres. Burnt coral (calcium hydroxide) can be used to produce the red dyes from noni but XRF would not distinguish the form of calcium.
Table 3

Results of XRF analysis

ID No

Al (%)

Si (%)

P (%)

S (%)

Cl (%)

K (%)

Ca (%)

Ti (%)

Fe (%)

Coloured

E417/11

Red

0.63

2.29

0.21

0.15

0.34

0.69

0.57

0.939

1.773

E595

Red

5.28

6.64

0.08

0.06

0.32

0.47

0.46

0.272

4.172

E598/1

Red

0.19

0.76

0.27

1.30

1.13

0.41

0.97

0.017

0.053

E598/1

Yellow

0.21

0.70

0.18

1.22

1.02

0.47

0.94

0.018

0.049

E598/2

Red

0.26

1.14

0.38

1.28

0.75

0.42

0.92

0.016

0.057

E598/3

Red

0.17

0.62

0.24

1.14

1.17

0.21

1.03

0.013

0.033

E598/4

Red

0.19

0.77

0.31

1.07

0.84

0.34

1.23

0.010

0.017

E599

Dark brown

0.12

0.41

0.11

0.23

0.06

0.04

1.62

0.046

0.333

E600

Red

0.18

0.60

0.30

0.81

0.30

0.04

1.10

0.021

0.046

E602

Red

1.08

3.04

0.50

0.52

0.39

0.45

0.44

0.330

1.031

E602

Yellow

0.57

1.71

0.38

0.49

0.69

0.38

0.46

0.193

0.602

E606

Red

< LOD

0.29

0.08

0.50

0.06

0.11

1.15

< LOD

< LOD

E611/3

Grey

< LOD

0.07

0.03

0.33

0.97

0.05

0.46

< LOD

< LOD

42853A

Red

0.11

0.22

0.17

0.95

1.37

0.21

0.69

< LOD

< LOD

42861

Red

0.42

1.37

0.24

0.23

0.18

0.58

0.39

0.459

1.149

42947B

Red

< LOD

0.06

0.15

0.29

0.44

1.00

1.69

< LOD

< LOD

42947B

Yellow

< LOD

< LOD

0.16

0.16

0.37

1.08

0.99

0.005

< LOD

67802A

Red

< LOD

0.31

0.19

0.42

1.13

0.12

1.74

< LOD

< LOD

98041

Red-brown

< LOD

0.07

0.07

0.24

0.03

1.01

1.32

< LOD

< LOD

Uncoloured

Average (n = 9)

 

0.02

0.26

0.04

0.53

0.29

0.10

0.55

0.003

0.006

Max

 

0.190

0.858

0.289

1.499

1.185

0.463

1.042

0.022

0.048

Min

 

< LOD

< LOD

< LOD

0.026

0.029

< LOD

0.102

< LOD

< LOD

LOD

 

0.057

0.034

0.013

0.020

0.008

0.021

0.051

0.005

0.010

The degree of weathering of the ochres indicated by the ratios of immobile elements (Al and Ti) to more mobile elements (Si and Fe) might be useful in identifying the sources of the iron ochre [13] but would require a much larger dataset than here.

Analysis summary

A table of all the cloths and the colourants found on them is shown in Table 4 and a summary of all the coloured cloths is shown in Table 5. From all the analysis carried out on the coloured cloths listed in Table 4 a small group of 5 plant derived colourants and 1 inorganic pigment were all that were found. For 40 samples a single colourant was found while in the remaining 12 samples a combination of up to three colourants were detected. Madder was found in only two samples on the same cloth. The noni (morindone) samples were all red whereas the noni (morindin) were both red and yellow. Noni (morindin) was used predominantly in combination with other colouring agents. A combination of iron ochre and organic dyes was found in 4 samples. The ease of extraction of most of the colorants points to the lack of traditional metallic mordenting. However, historically tree tannins were used as mordents [14]. Our findings show (Table 5) that although tannins were found as a single colorant in 11 cloths they were also found in combination with other colorants in 9 cloths where they may have been acting as a mordent.
Table 4

Colorants found by HPLC and XRF

Accession number

Description

Colours sampled

Colourant found

CTCTAH sample book

CTCSB2016 No. 10

Plain yellow

Yellow

Turmeric

CTCSB2016 No. 18

Red/yellow/black pattern

Yellow

Turmeric

CTCSB2016 No. 20

Plain red

Red

Noni(T)

CTCSB2016 No. 23

Plain red

Red

Noni(T), tannin

CTCSB2016 No. 29

Red/yellow/black pattern

Yellow

Turmeric

Hunterian museum

E417/2

Black/yellow pattern on undyed background

Yellow

Turmeric

E417/5

Black with red border

Red

Tannin

E417/11

Red zigzags on black background

Red

Tannin, iron oxide

E457/3

Red and yellow stripes on undyed background

Yellow

Turmeric

E458/1

Yellow/black pattern on undyed background

Yellow

Noni(U)

E458/3

Red/brown/black pattern

Light brown

Tannin

  

Red

Tannin

E458/2

Thin red stripes on yellow background

Yellow

Tannin

E458/4

Plain red-brown r

Red-brown

Tannin

E458/6

Plain brown and brown/yellow pattern

brown

Tannin

E595

Red with undyed spots

Red

Iron oxide

E595/1

Red pattern on yellow background

Red

Noni(U), tannin

  

Yellow

Noni(U)

E598/1

Red/yellow/black/undyed stripe pattern

Red

Noni(T)

E598/2

Red/black pattern

Red

Noni(T)

E598/3

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Noni(T)

E598/4

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Noni(T)

E599

Dark brown flaking coating

Dark brown

Tannin, iron oxide

E600

Red border stripe on undyed cloth

Red

Noni(T)

E601

Red, grey and undyed stripes

Red

Noni(T)

E602

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Iron oxide, trace turmeric

  

Yellow

Iron oxide, trace turmeric

E603

Plain red-brown cloth

Red-brown

Tannin

E606

Plain red and undyed blocks

Red

Tannin

E608

Plain yellow

Yellow

Turmeric

E667

Red/yellow/black pattern

Red

Noni(T)

Kew EBC

Kew 42853/2

Plain red cloth

Red

Noni(T)

Kew 42861

Poncho red/black/undyed pattern

Red

Iron oxide

Kew 42863

Multi-coloured stripe and leaf pattern on undyed background

Red-brown

Turmeric, tannin

  

Yellow

Turmeric

Kew 42885

Plain dark brown cloth

Dark brown

Tannin

Kew 42947/1

Red handprints on yellow background

Red

Noni(U), tannin

  

Yellow

Turmeric

Kew 42947/2

Red stripes on yellow background

Red

Noni(U)

  

Yellow

Turmeric

Kew 42958(1)

Red pattern on yellow background

Yellow

Turmeric

Kew 42958(2)

Red/brown pattern on undyed background

Brown

Noni(U), tannin

  

Light brown

Noni(U)

Kew 42958(3)

Red leaf pattern on yellow background

Red

Noni(U), tannin, turmeric

  

Yellow

Noni(U), turmeric

Kew 42966

Mottled red on undyed background

Red

Noni(T)

Kew 42967

Red/purple mottles in triangular pattern

Red

Madder

  

Purple

Madder

Kew 42979

Plain glossy red coating

Red

Tannin

Kew 67802

Red/yellow stripe pattern

Red

Noni(T)

Kew 73329

Brown pattern on undyed background, brown tassles

Brown

Noni(U), tannin

Kew 98041

Plain red-brown

Red-brown

Tannin

Table 5

Summary of colorants found in all barkcloth samples

Colorant

Number of barkcloth samples

Single

Madder

2

Noni(morindin)

4

Noni(morindone)

11

Tannin

11

Turmeric

10

Iron oxide

2

Combination

Noni(morindin) tannin

4

Noni(morindone) tannin

1

Noni(morinidin)turmeric

1

Noni(morindin) tannin turmeric

1

Tannin turmeric

1

Tannin iron oxide

2

Turmeric iron oxide

2

The reasons for the small number of colorants found could be that some of these cloths were prepared specifically as gifts for visitors and the colours and materials that the makers knew would retain their integrity over time were chosen; these colourants were used in prestigious cloths which were always intended to be gifts or for ceremonial uses and crucially like artisans worldwide experience had taught them that some colourants although initially bright and vivid quickly faded and so were rarely used after this discovery. The sequential extraction procedure showed that noni root was used to produce colourants based on morindin and morindone. The colour produced from noni is a stable and true red as opposed to the more brown/red produced from tree bark tannins and therefore noni has been frequently used to create a red colour.

Some colours may have faded so the cloths no longer appeared coloured and perhaps for that reason they were not sampled. In other cases the dye residue may not have been detectable. A number of cloths produced no evidence of colorant but some which appeared pale cream/yellow and seemed uncoloured when analysed showed the presence of turmeric. This may be because of a low application level or the instability of turmeric which is known to fade significantly due to light [15]. Anthocyanins, a widely suggested group of colorants, produce a variety of vivid colours but their colour is also known to fade. Zaffino et al. [16] reported that analysis of anthocyanin samples artificially aged and thus faded could still be detected.

Case studies

In this section 6 cloths have been chosen as case studies as they represent the variations in colorants used in the cloths studied and also the way in which a colorant derived from the same source can have its colour changed by the addition of other compounds. Where details of their origins and donation date to the collections are known this is included. Figure 3 shows 6 cloths.

EBC 42863

The red-brown lines on this leaf patterned cloth (Fig. 4a, i), attributed to Samoa, were too thin to sample but samples were taken from a filled in red-brown leaf (Fig. 4a, ii) and the broad yellow stripe. Both samples showed the presence of turmeric with the red-brown area also containing tannin.
Fig. 4

Images of the case studies cloths: EBC 428633 a (i) and (ii). E595/1 b (i) and (ii). EBC 42947A c (i), (ii) and (iii)

Hunterian E595/1

Figure 4b (i) shows a cloth, attributed to Tahiti where a red pattern has been painted on a yellow background. It has considerable areas of soiling perhaps caused by it being folded and the top surface left uncovered. The yellow background is coloured with noni (morinidin) and the red with noni (morindin) plus tannin, detail shown Fig. 4b (ii). This is the only cloth amongst those analysed that used noni to create both the red and yellow colour.

EBC 42947(a)

The yellow background of this ‘handprints’ cloth is turmeric (Fig. 4c, i). It is attributed to Hawaii and donated to the EBC in 1874 by HRH the Duke of Edinburgh. Samples obtained from the curved red stripe in the corner found it was painted with noni (morindin). Although no trace of turmeric was detected suggesting these red curves were painted separately and not over the yellow background from the cloth it is difficult to see how this was done (Fig. 4c, ii). It was not possible to sample the red from the hands (Fig. 4c, iii) but detailed study of the area round them suggests that the red was added on top of the yellow background.

EBC 42967

This cloth (Fig. 5a, i) attributed to Hawaii and donated to the EBC in 1874 by HRH Duke of Edinburgh. The purple and red areas both showed the presence of alizarin and purpurin indicating natural madder, Fig. 5a (ii). Light microscopy of an area (Fig. 5a, iii) shows the presence of coloured fibres not associated with barkcloth fibres. In the nineteenth century the introduction of dyed cloths to the Pacific Islands through trading enabled makers to incorporate these dyed cloths into the beaten barkcloths. “Turkey cloth” and “Turkey red” are cited as a favoured material used in kapamaking [17, 18]. Arthur et al. [17] describes how the Turkey red cotton fabric was shredded and then beaten into bark fibres resulting in a mottled red cloth which was then cut into shapes and beaten into the top layer of the tapa.
Fig. 5

Images of the case studies cloths: EBC 42967 a (i), (ii) and (iii). E602 b (i) and (ii). EBC 42861 c (i)

Turkey red cloth is a specific type of cotton cloth dyed with madder and mordented with alum and oil; this process was used by European dyers as early as the late eighteenth century [19]. Extraction solution 2 was used for this sample as the dye was likely to contain a mordant and extraction 1 was not sufficiently strong.

Hunterian E602

Figure 5b (i) shows this red, yellow and black diamond patterned cloth and Fig. 5b (ii) shows the pattern in more detail. The red and yellow is produced by differing concentrations of iron oxide. There is a trace of turmeric present in both coloured areas. This cloth is attributed to Hawaii whose geology has red earth (ochre). There was no indication that tannins had been used to create mixtures here as HPLC only detected turmeric in very low levels.

EBC 42861

Figure 5c shows a poncho/coat type garment ‘worn as a garment by the natives of Samoa’ (http://apps.kew.org/ecbot/specimen/42861), on which the red and black areas contain aluminosilicate, titanium and iron indicating the presence of an iron ochre pigment. The elevated P in the black diamonds and black area may be indicative of soot. Various nuts such as kukui (Aleurites moluccana) are burnt and the soot used to create black [6], the soot can be mixed with water, oil or bark tannins. It was not possible to sample this cloth for HPLC analysis so the presence of any additional dye components could not be investigated.

Conclusions

The findings show that despite the numerous colourant sources for the red, brown and yellow shades listed in the many accounts of historic barkcloth making (Kooijman) only 5 types of plant colorants and 1 inorganic pigment used singly or in combination were identified. A similar finding was reported by Bisulca et al. who examined 150 cloths from the Bishop Museum (Hawaii). The mild analytical extraction procedure prevented decomposition of glycosides allowing for a better understanding of the how these colourants were prepared for use. The case studies show the variations in colour that were achieved by the use of these few colourants, either singularly or in combination.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

HF developed the methodology for the sequential extraction for the HPLC analysis of samples and carried out the HPLC analysis. He also carried out XRF analysis. Collaborated in the writing. MS planned the research, sampled the cloths, carried out light microscopy and assisted with the HPLC and XRF analysis. Collaborated in the writing. JF carried out sampling, light microscopy, assisted with the XRF and contributed to the writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Margaret Smith and Jennifer Brunton were funded by AHRC (Grant Number AH/M00886X/1). Situating Pacific Barkcloth in Time and Place) http://www.tapa.ac.uk. The authors wish to thank Misa Tamura, the project conservation researcher, for her help in sampling and contributing her knowledge on the materials of barkcloth. Fiona Inches of the Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh for suppling plant materials. We are very grateful to Aisling Macken and Marika Kesler of the CTCTAH for photographing the cloths. We also wish to thank Ken Granger of Niton UK Ltd for training and loan of the XRF.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

Margaret Smith and Jennifer Brunton was funded by AHRC (Grant Number AH/M00886X/1).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrow T. Art and life in polynesia. London: Pall Mall Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neich R, Pendergrast M. Traditional tapa: textiles of the Pacific. London: Thames and Hudson; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kooijman S. Tapa in Polynesia. In: Bernice P, editor. Bishop museum bulletin. Hawaii: Bishop Museum Press; 1972.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bisulca C, Schattenburg-Raymond L, DuPreez K. Hawaiian Barkcloth from the bishop museum collections: a characterization of materials and techniques in collaboration with modern practitioners to effect preservation of a traditional cultural practice. In: Vandiver P, Li CM, Sciau P, editors. Symposium PP: materials issues in art and archaeology. Boston: Materials Research Society; 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tamburini D, Cartwright CR, Melchiorre Di Crescenzo M, Rayner G. Scientific characterisation of the dyes, pigments, fibres and wood used in the production of Barkcloth from Pacific islands. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0745-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen AW. Evolution of Polynesian bark cloth and factors influencing cultural change. J Anthropol. 2011;30(2):116–34.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wouters J, Grzywacz CM, Claro A. A comparative investigation of hydrolysis methods to analyze natural organic dyes by HPLC-PDA nine methods, twelve biological sources, ten dye classes, dyed yarns, pigments and paints. Stud Conserv. 2011;56(3):231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aobchey P, Sriyam S, Praharnripoorab W, Lhieochaiphant S, Phutrakul S. Production of red pigment from the root of Morinda angustifolia Roxb. var. scabridula Craib. by root cell culture. Chiang Mai Univ J. 2002;1(1):66–78.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derksen GCH, Naayer M, van Beek TA, Capelle A, Haaksman IK, van Doren HA, de Root AE. Chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis of anthraquinone glycosides from madder roots. Phytochem Anal. 2003;14(3):137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Degano I, Ribechini E, Modugno F, Colombini MP. Analytical methods for the characterization of organic dyes in artworks and in historical textiles. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2009;44(5):363–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanyova J. Mild extraction of dyes by hydrofluoric acid in routine analysis of historical paint micro-samples. Microchim Acta. 2008;162(3–4):361–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Degano I, La Nasa J. Trends in high performance liquid chromatography for cultural heritage. Top Curr Chem. 2016;374(2):20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faithful J. Curator of mineralogy and petrology, Hunterian Museum. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2018 (Personal Communication).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnett JR, Miller S, Pearce E. Colour and art: a brief history of pigments. Opt Laser Technol. 2006;38:445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoshizumi K, Crews PC. Characteristics of fading of wool cloth dyed with selected natural dyestuffs on the basis of solar radiant energy. Dyes Pigm. 2003;58(3):197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaffino C, Bruni S, Russo B, Pilu R, Lago C, Colonna GM. Identification of anthocyanins in plant sources and textiles by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). J Raman Spectrosc. 2016;47(3):269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arthur L. Cultural authentication of hawaiian quilting in the early 19th century. Cloth Text Res J. 2011;29(2):103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Firnhaber N, Erhardt D. Recent advances in the conservation and analysis of artifacts. In: Jubilee Conservation Conference, London 6–10 July 1987. National Museums of Artifacts, 1986). p. 178–85.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peel RA. Turkey red dyeing in scotland its heyday and decline. J Soc Dye Colour. 1952;68:496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Textile Conservation and Technical Art History School of Culture and Creative Arts University of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations