Advertisement

Infliximab for treatment-refractory transverse myelitis following immune therapy and radiation

  • Victoria A. Chang
  • Daniel R. Simpson
  • Gregory A. Daniels
  • David E. PiccioniEmail author
Open Access
Case report
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Case Reports

Abstract

Background

Neurologic toxicities with immune therapy are rare, but can cause devastating and often permanent injury when they occur. Although there is increasing interest in the potential synergism between immune therapy and radiation, it is possible that such combinations may lead to a greater number or increased severity of immune-related adverse events. We present here a case of extensive and progressive transverse myelitis following combined therapy, which did not improve until treatment with infliximab. This case highlights the unmet need for treatment of adverse events that are refractory to consensus recommendations, and may ultimately require further study and incorporation into future published guidelines.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 68-year-old with metastatic melanoma, who developed transverse myelitis in the setting of immune checkpoint blockade and spinal irradiation for vertebral metastases. Despite management according to published consensus guidelines: cessation of immune therapy, high-dose steroids, and plasmapheresis, he continued to deteriorate neurologically, and imaging revealed a progressive and ascending transverse myelitis. The patient was then treated with infliximab, and demonstrated dramatic imaging and modest clinical improvement following the first treatment cycle.

Conclusions

This is the first report describing the successful use of infliximab in immune therapy and radiation-related transverse myelitis that was not responding to recommended therapy. Evaluation of additional treatment options such as infliximab for high-grade immune-related neurologic toxicities is warranted, and may be needed earlier in the disease process to prevent significant morbidity. The adverse effects of immune therapy when used in combination with radiation also require further investigation.

Keywords

Transverse myelitis Infliximab Immune-related adverse events Checkpoint inhibitor Radiation 

Abbreviations

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT

Computed tomography

CTLA-4

Cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-antigen-4

ED

Emergency department

Gy

Gray

HTLV

Human T-lymphotropic virus

ICI

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

IVIG

Intravenous immunoglobulin

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

PD-1

Programmed death protein-1

PET

Positron emission tomography

SRS

Stereotactic radiosurgery

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, producing durable responses in both skin and solid organ malignancies [1]. The currently approved ICIs are monoclonal antibodies targeting the programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) or the cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-antigen-4 (CTLA-4) [2] pathways which normally limit immune responses. With this shift in the natural balance of the immune system toward its effector arm, immune-related adverse effects are to be expected. Indeed, immune-related toxicities have been demonstrated in nearly every organ system. For severe toxicities (grade 3 or higher according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute), current guidelines suggest management escalation in the following order: ICI cessation, high-dose steroids, other T cell suppressive medications and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis [3, 4, 5]. In many organ systems, toxicities unresponsive to standard management have also been shown to benefit from immunosuppressive drugs such as tocilizumab and infliximab [6]. Tocilizumab may lead to resolution of ICI-induced cytokine release syndrome [7], arthritis [8], pneumonitis [9], and myocarditis [10]. Infliximab has demonstrated benefit in management of immunotherapy-induced colitis [11, 12] and scleritis [13]. It is unclear if the combination of radiation with ICIs contributes to additional immune related adverse events, although small studies of either systemic or intracranial radiation with ICIs did not report increased toxicity [14, 15].

High-grade central and peripheral nervous system toxicity from ICIs is rare and occurs most commonly in the form of encephalopathies, meningoradiculoneuritis, Guillain-Barre like syndromes, and myasthenic syndromes [16]. Not only are neurologic toxicities rare, but their management when refractory to standard treatment is based on limited reports. Here, we describe a patient who developed transverse myelitis in the setting of ICI therapy and vertebral radiation for metastatic melanoma. His transverse myelitis failed to resolve with standard treatment outlined in published guidelines. In this case report, administration of infliximab produced both clinical and imaging improvement.

Case presentation

A man in his late 60s with a history of Stage I melanoma of the upper thigh, for which he had undergone wide local excision and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy 2 years prior, presented with new metastatic disease. On imaging, he was found to have lesions of the lung, liver, vertebrae, and brain. Fine needle aspiration of a thoracic lymph node confirmed metastatic melanoma. Next generation sequencing was notable for BRAF V600E mutation.

The patient started treatment with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab. While undergoing immunotherapy, the patient also received radiation to his T7-T10 vertebral metastases (30 Gray (Gy) in 10 fractions) and had stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to 16 brain metastases. Spinal irradiation was performed with a 3D conformal technique using opposed anterior-posterior/ posterior-anterior fields. The maximum dose to the spinal canal was 33.5 Gy.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain following SRS showed marked treatment response. Re-staging computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, performed 2 months after his initial staging scans, also showed major systemic response. Prior to starting his fourth cycle of ipilimumab and nivolumab, the patient noted the onset of intermittent numbness and tingling of the soles of his feet, with gradual ascension to his knees over the next 2 months.

MRI brain 1 month later showed a new punctate cerebellar metastasis, which was treated using SRS. Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT demonstrated resolution of numerous hyper-metabolic lesions with a remaining area of increased focal uptake in the left ischial tuberosity (Fig. 1). Given evidence of disease progression in the ischial tuberosity but not other systemic areas, the patient transitioned to pembrolizumab and received radiation to his ischial lesion. Approximately 2 weeks after starting pembrolizumab, the patient noted gait instability and ataxia, and further ascension of numbness to the level of his hips. At that time, he was still able to ambulate independently with the assistance of walking sticks. One month after starting pembrolizumab, the patient presented to the emergency department (ED) with 1 day of urinary retention and fecal incontinence. A spinal MRI was performed which showed T2 signal abnormality and patchy enhancement in the thoracic spinal cord (T5 to T10) concerning for myelitis or radiation necrosis without evidence of tumor or malignant cord compression. The T2 signal abnormality corresponded with the thoracic spinal radiation field (Fig. 2). Given that the lesion was enhancing and initially confined to the radiation field, radiation necrosis was favored at that time.
Fig. 1

Coronal positron emission tomography images of patient before (a) and 5 months after (b) initiation of ICI demonstrating complete resolution of widespread hypermetabolic lesions in the lungs, liver, skeleton and mediastinum with the exception of a residual lesion in the left ischium

Fig. 2

Sagittal images of the (a) radiation treatment fields used for palliative spinal radiation extending from thoracic vertebral level T7-T10 and (b) follow-up spinal MRI obtained 6 months after radiation therapy showing T2 signal abnormality (white arrows) within the region of previous radiation therapy. The dark blue, yellow, and cyan lines in panel A correspond to the 95, 100, 105% isodose lines, respectively

The patient’s immunotherapy was discontinued, steroids (dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily) were initiated, and two doses of bevacizumab (for possible radiation necrosis) were administered, without improvement. Lumbar puncture was deferred due to recent bevacizumab. Given the lack of improvement to optimal therapy for radiation necrosis, transverse myelitis was then favored. Results of serologic evaluation of metabolic (vitamin B12, thyroid stimulating hormone), infectious (human immunodeficiency virus, rapid plasma reagin), and autoimmune (anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-Ro/La, aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) etiologies of transverse myelitis were normal. The patient was trialed on high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (1000 mg daily for 5 days) for transverse myelitis. His lower extremity numbness and gait instability progressed and he started plasmapheresis.

Following 15 sessions of plamapheresis, a dose of cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 was added but the patient continued to decline with worsening urinary retention, bilateral lower extremity spasticity, and complete loss of lower extremity sensation to T5. He did not have upper extremity involvement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis at that time was remarkable for elevated protein (total protein, 99 mg/dL; institutional normal range, 15–45 mg/dL) and negative for malignant cells. Myelin basic protein was elevated at 31.6 ng/mL (normal < 5.5), and oligoclonal bands were matched in the serum and CSF, consistent with an ongoing systemic immune reaction. CSF albumin index was mildly elevated, suggestive of slight impairment of the blood-CSF barrier. Serum studies for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) I and II, and a paraneoplastic panel (anti-NR1, anti-GAD65, anti-alpha 3AChR, anti-LGI1, anti-VGCC, anti-VGKC, anti-CASPR2, anti-amphiphysin, anti-CV2, anti-Hu, anti-Ma, anti-Ta, anti-recoverin, anti-Ri, anti-Yo, anti-Zic4) were negative. A serum IL-6 level was normal. A serum TNF-alpha level was not obtained. MRI of the brain demonstrated two new intracranial metastases. MRI of the spine showed progression of transverse myelitis from T3 to T11 (Fig. 3c), now clearly outside the radiation field. Body PET/CT revealed worsening osseous metastatic lesions; therefore the patient began dabrafenib and trametinib. Given his ascending transverse myelitis despite optimal therapy other options including tocilizumab and infliximab were considered. Based on the low IL-6 level, the patient was started on infliximab. Spinal MRI 3 weeks after the first dose of infliximab showed a dramatic reduction of the level of the T2 cord signal abnormality back to T6 to T10 (Fig. 3d) with corresponding improvement in sensory level and muscle spasms. Continued treatment with infliximab led to additional incremental gains on imaging but without further clinical improvement. He subsequently developed systemic progression on dabrafenib and tremetinib (but with stable central nervous system disease) and ultimately succumbed to his disease.
Fig. 3

T2-weighted sagittal MRI images of thoracic spine. The 7th thoracic vertebrae is marked for reference. Arrow indicates the superior border of the transverse myelitis. a before initiation of therapy, no intrinsic spinal cord lesion. b 6 months after radiation, with cord changes around T7. c 11 months after radiation, with progressive symptoms and ascending transverse myelitis despite therapy. d Three weeks after initiation of infliximab, with significant improvement. e. Two months after infliximab, still with some cord abnormality around T7

Discussion and conclusions

We describe a patient with metastatic melanoma who developed progressive transverse myelitis following combination therapy with ICIs and spinal irradiation. His sensory symptoms first manifested approximately 3 months after starting ipilimumab/nivolumab and radiation therapy, and acutely worsened when he was transitioned to pembrolizumab. Our patient was unresponsive to the standard of care recommended by several consensus groups (discontinuation of immunotherapy, high dose steroids, and extensive plasmapheresis treatments), but demonstrated modest clinical and significant imaging improvement with infliximab. To our knowledge, this case represents the first report of successful treatment of ICI-induced transverse myelitis with infliximab. While most cases can be managed with the discontinuation of immunotherapy and steroids, the optimal steroid dosing for transverse myelitis and immunotherapy-related toxicities has not been prospectively defined. Per the American Academy of Neurology guidelines, the recommended dose and duration of steroids for TM is 1 g IV methylprednisolone daily for 3 to 7 days [17]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for immunotherapy-related transverse myelitis suggest at least 2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone and to strongly consider 1 g daily for 3–5 days. The next recommended steps for unresponsive cases are IVIG or plasmapheresis. There is no consensus on how to proceed following the failure of plasmapheresis. A recent case of ICI-related encephalitis also showed durable response to infliximab [18]. That case, along with the case presented here, suggest that infliximab may be beneficial for refractory cases of neurologic ICI adverse events.

Causality is particularly challenging to attribute in this case because the patient received immunotherapy and radiation treatment concurrently, and the area of involvement starts within the radiation field. Several features suggest a combined effect of radiation and immune therapy. First, the dose of radiation that this patient received (30 Gy in 10 fractions) is well below the tolerance dose of the spinal cord and highly unlikely to cause myelopathy in isolation [19, 20, 21]. Second, the time course of his symptom progression is inconsistent with classically described forms of spinal cord radiation toxicity, which is typically a late complication that develops more than 6 months following RT [22]. Third, the acute worsening of his symptoms 2 weeks after starting pembrolizumab and the extension outside the radiation field further suggests an autoimmune contribution. Lastly, lack of improvement with bevacizumab, which has been shown to be helpful in radiation-induced myelitis, versus response to infliximab is consistent with a component of immune dysregulation.

Thus, the development of a spinal cord lesion of this severity was likely the consequence of the combined impact of RT and immunotherapy. Immune therapy can lead to adverse autoimmune complications, but typically responds to discontinuing the offending agent, steroids and plasmapheresis. The intensity of the reaction in our patient provides caution in applying overlapping therapies of radiation and immune modulation. As more patients receive combined radiation and immunotherapy, clinicians must be vigilant for adverse events, and may need additional therapies such as infliximab early in the disease process for patients not responding to steroids, IVIG or plasmapheresis, in order to prevent significant toxicity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank our patient and his family, who supported the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed.

Authors’ contributions

VAC and DEP contributed to the planning, organization, data collection, and writing of the manuscript. DRS contributed to figure design. DRS and GAD reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Drake CG, Lipson EJ, Brahmer JR. Breathing new life into immunotherapy: review of melanoma, lung and kidney cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(1):24–37  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camacho LH. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: biology, safety, efficacy, and future considerations. Cancer Med. 2015;4(5):661–72  https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(17):1714–68 http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, Bingham CO, Brogdon C, Dadu R, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) toxicity management working group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, Andrews S, Armand P, Davies M, et al. Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities (immune checkpoint inhibitor-related toxicities) version 2.2018. NCCN. 2018 [updated 2018 Aug 19]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/immunotherapy.pdf
  6. 6.
    Mir R, Shaw HM, Nathan PD. Immunosuppressive agents and their role in managing immunotherapy toxicities in melanoma. Clin Ski Cancer. 2017;2(1–2):18–23  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsc.2017.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rotz SJ, Leino D, Szabo S, Mangino JL, Turpin BK, Pressey JG. Severe cytokine release syndrome in a patient receiving PD-1-directed therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(12):1–4  https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim ST, Tayar J, Trinh VA, Suarez-Almazor M, Garcia S, Hwu P, et al. Successful treatment of arthritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors with tocilizumab: a case series. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):2061–4  https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stroud CRG, Hegde A, Cherry C, Naqash AR, Sharma N, Addepalli S, et al. Tocilizumab for the management of immune mediated adverse events secondary to PD-1 blockade. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017;0(0):1–7  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155217745144.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asnani A. Cardiotoxicity of immunotherapy: incidence, diagnosis, and Management. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018;20(6):44  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0690-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnston RL, Lutzky J, Chodhry A, Barkin JS. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody-induced colitis and its management with infliximab. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(11):2538–40  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0641-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minor DR, Chin K, Kashani-sabet M. Infliximab in the treatment of anti-CTLA4 antibody (ipilimumab) induced immune-related colitis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009;24(3):321–5  https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2008.0607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doctor P, Sultan A, Syed S, Christen W, Bhat P, Foster CS. Infliximab for the treatment of refractory scleritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):579–83  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.150961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luke JJ, Lemons JM, Karrison TG, Pitroda SP, Melotek JM, Zha Y, et al. Safety and clinical activity of Pembrolizumab and multisite stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1611–8 http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McBride SM, Sherman EJ, Tsai CJ, Baxi SS, Aghalar J, Eng J, et al. A phase II randomized trial of nivolumab with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus nivolumab alone in metastatic (M1) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; abstr 6009). http://abstracts.asco.org/214/AbstView_214_223041.html.
  16. 16.
    Cuzzubbo S, Javeri F, Tissier M, Roumi A, Barlog C, Doridam J, et al. Neurological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2017;73:1–8  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scott TF, Frohman EM, De Seze J, Gronseth GS, Weinshenker BG. Evidence-based guideline: Clinical evaluation and treatment of transverse myelitis. Neurology 2011;77(24):2128 LP – 2122134. http://n.neurology.org/content/77/24/2128Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia CA, El-Ali A, Rath TJ, et al. Neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with adjuvant ipilimumab: report of two cases. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(83) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117978/.
  19. 19.
    Abbatucci JS, Delozier T, Quint R, Roussel ABD. Radiation myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord: time, dose and volume factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978;4(3–4):239–48  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(78)90144-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirkpatrick JP, Van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE. Radiation dose-volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl 1):S42–9  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong CS, Van Dyk J, Milosevic MLN. Radiation myelopathy following single course of radiotherapy and retreatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30(3):575–81  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(92)90943-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong CS, Fehlings MG, Sahgal A. Pathobiology of radiation myelopathy and strategies to mitigate injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:574–80  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San Diego, Moores Cancer CenterLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Hematology & OncologyUniversity of California San Diego, Moores Cancer CenterLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of NeurosciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations