Advertisement

Epidemiology and management of hepatitis C virus infections in immigrant populations

  • Nicola CoppolaEmail author
  • Loredana Alessio
  • Lorenzo Onorato
  • Caterina Sagnelli
  • Margherita Macera
  • Evangelista Sagnelli
  • Mariantonietta Pisaturo
Open Access
Scoping Review

Abstract

Background

At present, there is a continuous flow of immigrants from the south of the world to north-western countries. Often immigrants originate from areas of high-prevalence of viral hepatitis and pose a challenge to the healthcare systems of the host nations. Aims of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and virological and clinical characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in immigrants and the strategies to identify and take care of the immigrants infected with HCV.

Main body

We conducted an electronic literature search in several biomedical databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, using different combinations of key words: “HCV infection; chronic hepatitis C, immigrants; low-income countries”. We included studies written in English indicating the epidemiological data of HCV infection in the immigrant population, studies that assessed the clinical presentation, clinical management and treatment with directly acting antiviral agent in immigrants,

HCV infection is unevenly distributed in different countries, with worldwide prevalence in the general population ranging from 0.5 to 6.5%. In Western countries and Australia this rate ranges from 0.5 to 1.5%, and reaches 2.3% in countries of south-east Asia and eastern Mediterranean regions, 3.2% in China, 0.9% in India, 2.2% in Indonesia and 6.5% in Pakistan; in sub-Saharan Africa the prevalence of HCV infection varies from 4 to 9%. Immigrants and refugees from intermediate/high HCV endemic countries to less- or non-endemic areas are more likely to have an increased risk of HCV infection due to HCV exposure in their countries of origin. Because of the high HCV endemicity in immigrant populations and of the high efficacy of directly acting antiviral agent therapy, a campaign could be undertaken to eradicate the infection in this setting.

Conclusions

The healthcare authorities should support screening programs for immigrants, performed with the help of cultural mediators and including educational aspects to break down the barriers limiting access to treatments, which obtain the HCV clearance in 95% of cases and frequently prevent the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Keywords

HCV infection Chronic hepatitis C, immigrant Directly acting antiviral agent Low-income country 

Abbreviations

DAA

Directly acting antiviral agents

HBV

Hepatitis B virus

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV

Hepatitis C virus

HIV

Human immunodeficiency virus

NS3

Non-structural 3 region

NS5A

Non-structural protein 5A

NS5B

Non-structural protein 5B

peg-IFN

Pegylated-interferon-α

RBV

Ribavirin

SVR

Sustained virological response

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the five official working languages of the United Nations.

Background

Since ancient times, the history of humanity has been greatly influenced by numerous migratory phenomena that have determined the current ethnic composition of nations. At present, there is a continuous flow of immigrants from the south of the world to north-western countries, due to the inability to achieve economic and social development in geographical areas where dictatorial regimens have been responsible for wars between states, civil wars and tribal clashes that have impoverished the population and sown hatred and famine. The immigrants are motivated to leave their native countries for a variety of reasons, including political issues, escaping conflict or natural disaster, a desire for economic prosperity or family re-unification.

Often immigrants originate from areas of high-prevalence of viral hepatitis and pose a challenge to the healthcare systems of the host nations. The lack of universal standards for screening, vaccination and treatment of viral hepatitis causes a continuous increase in the burden of chronic liver disease among immigrant populations globally.

Studies have identified patient factors such as lack of knowledge, late presentation and poor adherence to follow-up and fear of the side effects of treatment as major barriers for effective treatment of viral hepatitis [1, 2]. The identification of barriers to treatment is critical since studies show that improving sustained virological response (SVR) rates is not enough to improve hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication rates without a concurrent increase in treatment uptake [3]. Therefore, even if the cost-effectiveness of universal screening of immigrants for HCV has not been clearly established, since HCV prevalence varies widely among host nations and immigrant groups and is likely to depend on the expected HCV prevalence, treatment uptake rates, and expected SVR [4], efforts to increase case identification and treatment among immigrants should be made.

In this review the authors try to outline the management of immigrants with chronic HCV infection, one of the most frequent and serious health problems both in immigrant and host populations. Today, new treatments with directly acting antiviral agents (DAAs), expensive drugs of good tolerability, obtain HCV clearance in 95% of cases and frequently prevent the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). So, in this study the authors evaluated the prevalence and virological and clinical characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the immigrant population and the strategies to identify and take care of the immigrants infected with HCV; the immigrants were defined as subjects from endemic areas for HCV infection, mostly the south of the world, to less- or non-endemic areas, mostly north-western countries. In the DAA era it is important to recognize the immigrants with HCV infection to eradicate it.

Search strategy

We conducted an electronic literature search in several biomedical databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, using different combinations of key words: “HCV infection; chronic hepatitis C, immigrants; low-income countries”.

We included studies written in English indicating the epidemiological data of HCV infection in the immigrant population, studies that assessed the clinical presentation, clinical management and treatment with DAAs in immigrants, excluding those that presented the data only in autochthonous patients of host nations and those not written in the English language.

Among the 569 potentially relevant articles identified from the search of electronic databases, we found the studies included in the text and in the tables.

Main text

Global trend in immigration

According to the 2017 data by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) report, 258 million people are living out of their country of origin, with a 49% increase in the last 15 years [5], a figure not including the undocumented immigrants who account for 10–15% of the immigration flow worldwide [6]. In 2017, 74% of immigrants were of working age (between 20 and 64 years of age), a percentage higher than that of the global population (57%), and women comprise 48.4% of all immigrants [5, 7]. Most immigrants move from the south of the world to north and western countries, especially Europe and North America.

In 2016, the immigrants living in the 28 countries of the European Union were 37 million, accounting for 7.3% of the total population, mainly distributed in 5 countries: Germany (23.4%), United Kingdom (15.3%), Italy (13.6%), Spain (12%) and France (11.9%) [8].

The countries of origin of the immigrants have a high or intermediate endemicity for several parenteral infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; instead, the hosting countries have a low or no endemicity for these infections. The immigrant population meets several obstacles in accessing the essential healthcare services in the host country, including cultural and language barriers, lack of inclusive health policies for immigrants and the illegal status for undocumented immigrants. These obstacles have a disruptive impact on the well-being of the immigrant population since they reduce the possibility of obtaining satisfactory results in terms of public health, such as the control and prevention of HIV, HCV, HBV infection, tuberculosis, malaria and human influenza. The high morbidity and mortality rates of these infections raise critical health concerns that deserve attention by the Healthcare Authorities.

HCV infection

Virological and epidemiological characteristics

Hepatitis C virus is a hepatotropic member of the Flaviridae family. Seven main genotypes (with 30–35% variation at the nucleotide level) and 67 subtypes (with less than 15% difference at the nucleotide level) have so far been described, each composed of a myriad of viral quasi-species [9, 10, 11, 12]. Discovered in 1989, HCV has been considered responsible for more than half of the cases of chronic liver disease worldwide [13].

Exposure to infected blood or blood products (intravenous drug use, iatrogenic exposure, tattooing, piercing) and risky sexual habits (multiple partners, anal sex, presence of genital lesions) are the risk factors most frequently associated to HCV transmission [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Perinatal transmission from HCV-infected mothers to their newborn babies has a limited epidemiologic role since it occurs in less than 5% of the cases, a prevalence increased in the case of HCV/HIV coinfection [19]. Needlestick is a frequent event in health care workers, but its epidemiologic role is limited most probably because of the low quantity of blood usually carried by contaminated needles [20].

Global epidemiology of HCV infection

The WHO estimated that 71 million people were living with HCV infection in 2015, accounting for 1% of the world population. The infection is unevenly distributed in different countries, with a prevalence in the general population ranging from 0.5 to 6.5%. In Western countries and Australia this rate ranges from 0.5 to 1.5%; it reaches 2.3% in countries of south-east Asia and in eastern Mediterranean regions [21], 3.2% in China, 0.9% in India, 2.2% in Indonesia and 6.5% in Pakistan [22].

The global distribution of each HCV genotype varies in different geographical regions. HCV genotype 1 is the most prevalent worldwide and has a widespread geographical distribution, representing 46% of all HCV infections. HCV genotype 3 is the second most prevalent genotype and accounts for 30% of global infections, and is more common in south Asia, Australia, and in some countries in Europe. HCV genotypes 2 and 4 represent 9–13% of HCV infections with a more limited geographical distribution; HCV genotype 2 prevalence is higher in Asia and West Africa, while a high incidence of HCV genotype 4 infection occurs in central and eastern sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa, and the Middle East. HCV genotypes 5, 6, and 7 are the most restricted in geographical distribution, with genotype 5 common in South Africa and genotype 6 prevalent in east and south-east Asia, while genotype 7 infection has been reported in a small number of individuals from the Democratic Republic of Congo [10, 11].

Clinical aspects

After HCV infection has been acquired, nearly 35% of subjects clear the virus spontaneously or after a self-limited asymptomatic acute hepatitis, whereas the remaining 65% progress to chronicity, usually identified by the persistence of HCV RNA in the serum after 6 months [23].

The natural history of chronic HCV infection is extremely variable, ranging from a long-term persistence of minimal liver changes with an indolent progression of liver fibrosis to a rapid transition to liver cirrhosis and the development of severe complications such as portal hypertension, liver failure and HCC [24, 25]. In most cases, however, liver fibrosis shows a slow progression and liver cirrhosis develops in about 20% of patients within 20 years [24, 25]. Several factors may speed the progression of liver disease, including old age at the time of infection, concomitant alcohol abuse, a presence of diabetes or other metabolic disorders, an impaired host immune response of different nature, including coinfection with HIV and coinfection with HBV [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28].

Therapeutic management

The combination of pegylated interferon-alpha (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) was the treatment of choice for HCV-related chronic infection for more than a decade, providing a sustained HCV clearance in half of the patients infected with HCV-genotype 1, in around 75% of those with HCV-genotype 2 and in around 60% of those with HCV-genotype 3. However, a non-satisfactory therapeutic response and the high frequency and severity of side effects of interferon-based treatments have urged pharmaceutical companies to develop more effective and better-tolerated drugs [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], termed directly acting antivirals (DAAs), which have revolutionized the treatment of HCV infection. Interferon-free treatment with DAAs provides excellent chances for a sustained HCV elimination and can prevent the progression of the liver disease. According to guidelines there are different treatment schedules, depending on the HCV genotype and sub-type and on the presence or absence of cirrhosis (Table 1). These new oral interferon-free DAA regimens provide an SVR in nearly 95% of patients treated [34, 35].
Table 1

directly acting antiviral agent (DAA) regimens and specific indication according to HCV genotype and severity of liver disease

DAA regimen

HCV regions covered

HCV Genotype

Pill/day

Duration in weeks

Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir

NS3 + NS5A + NS5B

1,4

4

 

 - Non cirrhosis

   

8a

 - Cirrhosis

   

12

Elbasvir/grazoprevir

NS3 + NS5A

1,4

1

12b

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir

NS5A + NS5B

1-6

1

12

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir

NS3 + NS5A

1-6

3

 

 - Non cirrhosis

   

8

 - Cirrhosis

   

12

a genotype 1b; NS3 non-structural 3 region, NS5A non-structural protein 5A, NS5B non-structural protein 5B

b16 weeks for GT1a with high viral load and/or NS5A RASs

HCV infection in immigrant populations

Risk factors for HCV infection in immigrant populations

Immigrants from the south of the world are at a particularly high risk for HCV infection because they come from countries with a high or intermediate endemicity; moreover, they have scanty knowledge of this infectious disease and of the routes of transmission due to the lack of access to healthcare and to the difficulty in obtaining healthcare information from the media. Other important points to evaluate are that they are mostly young, sexually active and have been subjected to tribal rituals that may favor the parenteral spread of this infection.

Whereas the improvement in blood screening and in the sterilization of medical devices has produced a decline in HCV transmission in western Europe and North America, where HCV is currently transmitted mostly through the injection of illicit drugs [36], iatrogenic exposure and tribal rituals remain the major route of transmission in developing countries [37].

A retrospective cohort study [38] conducted in Canada from 1998 to 2007 compared 1821 immigrants and 18 318 non-immigrants, all HCV-positive and hospitalized. Compared with immigrants, non-immigrants showed a higher proportion of males and a higher rate of intravenous drug users and HCV/HIV coinfection. A US study group compared the prevalence and correlates of alcohol abuse among US foreign-born versus US-natives by race-ethnicity, experiencing that the foreign-born had lower rates of alcohol abuse than the US-born, but some variations were noted by race-ethnicity. The risk of alcohol abuse could be due to stressful and traumatic experiences of war, torture, and potentially traumatic migration journeys [39, 40, 41].

The Greenaway group [42] reported that HCV immigrants presented a mean delay in diagnosis and linkage to care of almost 10 years after arrival, which could explain, together with a high rate of HIV coinfection, the higher incidence of HCC in this group.

Prevalence of HCV infection in immigrant populations

The prevalence of HCV infection in the immigrant populations varies according to the countries of origin. Table 2 shows data of HCV seroprevalence, comparing in each country/region the prevalence of HCV in the general population vs immigrant population [43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52].
Table 2

Prevalence of HCV infection in immigrant populations according to the area of origin and prevalence of HCV infection in the indigenous population

Author, year

Country/ HCV-Ab prevalence in general population (ECDC) [43]

Number of patients

Enrolment period

Area of origin

n (%)

HCV-Ab- positive

n (%)

HCV-RNA- positive

n (%)

Tafuri, 2010 [50]

Italy

2.1–8%

529

May–July 2008

Africa: 510 (96.4)

Total: 24 (4.5)

Not reported

Asia 19 (3.6)

Bottecchia, 2011 [45]

Spain

1.1–2%

1718

January 2007– December 2008

Africa: 1322 (77); Latin America: 378 (22)

Total: 212 (12.3)

Not reported

Asia: 18 (1)

Urbanus, 2011 [47]

Netherlands

<  0.5%

5580

2003–2009

Western countries: 720 (22.9)

2 (0.3)

2 (0.3)

Non-western countries: 4860 (87.1)

34 (0.7)

28 (0.6)

Rivas, 2013 [46]

Spain

1.7%

1493

January 2002– December 2008

Equatorial Guinea: 1220 (81.6)

234 (19.2)

141 (11.6)

Other sub-Saharan countries: 276 (18.4)

2 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

Stornaiuolo, 2013 [51]

Italy

2.1–8%

2681

1999–2009

North Africa: 101 (3.8%)

10 (9.9)

Not reported

Sub-Saharan Africa: 2202 (82.3%)

54 (2.5)

Eastern Europe: 211 (7.9%)

15 (7.1)

Asia: 115 (4.3%)

4 (3.5)

Coppola, 2013 [48]

Italy

2.1–8%

882

January 2012– June 2013

Northern Africa: 80 (9.1)

2 (2.5)

Not reported

Sub-Saharan Africa: 444 (50.3)

17 (3.8)

Eastern Europe: 198 (22.5)

12 (6.1)

India-Pakistan area: 126 (14.3)

9 (7.1)

Daw, 2016 [44]

Libya

1.2%

14 205

2013–2015

Central Africa: 2557 (18.0)

146 (5.7)

Not reported

West Africa: 4993 (35.1)

405 (8.1)

Horn of Africa: 3524 (24.8)

296 (8.4)

North Africa: 3131 (22.1)

314 (10.0)

Sagnelli, 2018 [49]

Italy

2.1–8%

1727

2012–2017

Northern Africa: 94 (5.4)

2 (2.2)

1 (1.1)

Sub-Saharan Africa: 1084 (62.8)

35 (3.6)

9 (0.9)

Eastern Europe: 261 (15)

15 (5.7)

11 (4.2)

India-Pakistan area: 371 (21.5)

16 (4.3)

9 (2.4)

Other countries: 29 (1.7)

2 (6.9)

1 (3.4)

Jablonka, 2017 [52]

Germany

<  0.5%

604

August–September 2015

European Region: 41 (6.8)

5 (1.0)

Total: 4 (0.6)

African Region: 55 (9.1)

1 (2.4)

Eastern Mediterranean Region: 482 (79.8)

1 (1.8)

South East Asia: 7 (1.2)

0 (0.0)

Unknown: 19 (3.1)

0 (0.0)

ECDC European center for diseases prevention and control

Bottecchia et al. [45] screened for HCV, HBV and HIV 1718 consecutive immigrants referring to a Spanish institution in 2007–2008, of whom 77% were from sub-Saharan Africa, and found a seroprevalence of 12.3, 7 and 7.9%, respectively. The same authors evaluated the prevalence of HCV infection in a cohort of 1220 subjects from Equatorial Guinea living in Spain in 2002–2008 and detected anti-HCV positivity in 19.2% and HCV-RNA positivity in 11.6% of cases [46]. In 2011, Urbanus and colleagues [47] reported the data of four HCV seroprevalence surveys enrolling either heterosexual patients referring to the sexually-transmitted-infections clinics in Amsterdam, randomly selected pregnant women, a randomly selected sample of inhabitants in Amsterdam or a randomly selected sample of inhabitants of the Netherlands, for a total of 4860 non-Western and 9329 Western participants. Worthy of note, the HCV seroprevalence ranged from 0.7 to 2.3% in non-Western first-generation immigrants from different countries and from 0 to 1.6% in the second-generation of non-Western immigrants. Our research group found a 4% anti-HCV seroprevalence in 882 undocumented immigrants/low-income refugees from different countries and living in the urban areas of Naples and Caserta in southern Italy in 2012–2013 [48], and, more precisely, in 2.5% of immigrants from north Africa, in 6.1% of those from Eastern Europe and in 7.1% of those from the India-Pakistan subcontinent. Updated results of this study regarded 1727 immigrants screened from 2012 to 2015 [49], of whom 70 (4.1%) were anti-HCV-positive. Of these 70, 31 (44.3%) were HCV-RNA-positive with a mean viral load of 2.2 × 107. This anti-HCV prevalence is similar to those reported by other authors in southern Italy: 4.5% by Tafuri et al. [50] in 529 refugees observed in 2008 in the Apulia region and 3.6% found by Stornaiuolo et al. [51] in 2681 immigrants enrolled between 1999 and 2009 in the Campania region.

A meta-analysis published in 2015 by Greenaway and co-workers [53] included 50 studies reporting the HCV seroprevalence in immigrants born in low-income areas and living in developed countries with a low/intermediate HCV prevalence. Out of the 38 635 subjects investigated, 1.9% were anti-HCV-positive (0.63% in the pediatric and 2.34% in the adult population); this rate was 0.77% in immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean, 4.39% in those from sub-Saharan Africa and 4.76% in those from southern Asia. HCV RNA was determined only in six of the 50 studies considered, accounting for 13% of the 38 635 immigrants.

Interesting are also the data from a retrospective database study describing the epidemiology of HCV-infected patients in the Maccabi Healthcare Services, a health maintenance organization in Israel. The highest prevalence was found among males and in patients aged 35–54 years; two thirds of HCV-infected patients were immigrants from the former Soviet Union [54].

All of these studies highlight the need for systematic screening directed to immigrants from low-income endemic areas, who, despite a high prevalence of cases with HCV chronic infection, are often unaware of their clinical condition [42], as sometimes occurs even among the native population [41].

Management of HCV chronic infection and associated diseases in immigrant populations

Different types of barriers hinder the access of immigrants to optimal health care services, such as patient-physician communication, language problems, beliefs, traditional medicine, ethnic disparities and inadequacies arising from socioeconomic problems including lack of family support [55, 56, 57, 58]. Villagran et al. observed that beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine are negatively related to medical adherence in Mexican immigrants in Texas [59]. Immigrants usually lack adequate knowledge on HCV infection, correlated diseases and treatment [56] and the HCV-infected remain undiagnosed and untreated [57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. Left untreated, approximately 20% of individuals with chronic HCV infection progress to liver cirrhosis, which may lead to an end-stage liver disease and HCC development [61, 62]. Immigrants from an endemic area and/or at risk of having acquired HCV, HBV or HIV infection and seen for a consultation at a clinical centre of the National Healthcare System or of a charity organization should be informed of ways to prevent the transmission of infections, on the related clinical events and treatments and on the advantage of a free-of-charge anonymous screening.

Screening programs

The organization of adequate and functional screening programs for infectious diseases in immigrants is complicated as they cannot easily access National Healthcare Systems; the literature does not contain much research on this topic. Furthermore, in some countries there are no screening programs for immigrants. In the US, the immigration medical examination does not include tests for viral hepatitis [63]. Similarly, universal testing for viral hepatitis is not mandated in Canada, even in patients originating from countries with high prevalence [64]. Instead, the immigration medical screening policies in the EU region are country-specific [55]. Hepatitis screening is currently not required as a condition of entry into the EU region, but some countries have developed programs to screen pregnant mothers from high prevalence regions for HBV infection considering the high risk of maternal-fetal transmission, and then vaccinate their newborns [65, 66].

Our research group screening for HBV, HCV and HIV infection in 2032 undocumented immigrants and low-income refugees was performed in 2012–2013 in southern Italy, involving primary-care outpatient’s clinics in hospitals of the National Healthcare System or of international charity organizations [48, 49, 67, 68, 69]. The immigrants seen for a clinical consultation were made aware of the importance of these infections by the physician in care with the help of a cultural mediator and asked to undergo screening for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, offered free of charge and in anonymity. As regards HCV infection, 70 (4.1%) were anti-HCV-positive, all unaware of their serological condition, of whom 31 (44.3%) were HCV-RNA-positive.

Treatment and management of HCV infected immigrants

Few studies have been published at present on the care and treatment outcome of HCV-positive immigrants treated with oral interferon-free DAA therapies, possibly because of the unavailability of drugs in some countries and of the numerous barriers impeding successful treatment, such as a scanty possibility of screening, poor knowledge of one’s clinical condition, fear of side effects of treatment, late submission to a clinical center authorized for the free administration of drugs and poor adherence to treatment follow-up. [70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78].

In our experience, the 31 HCV-RNA-positive migrants were included in a clinical therapeutic follow-up at a third-level unit of infectious diseases, assisted by a cultural mediator [49]. At that time, following the instructions of the Italian Healthcare Authorities, an oral interferon-free DAA regimen was reserved for cirrhotic patients, whereas those at high risk of developing cirrhosis were to be treated with an Interferon-based treatment and those at low risk of progression left untreated in a waiting list for future interferon-free treatment, once licensed. Of the 31 HCV-RNA-positive immigrants, two had liver cirrhosis, received an interferon-free DAA regimen (one with sofosbuvir + ledipasvir + ribavirin for 3 months and the other with sofosbuvir + daclatasvir + ribavirin for 6 months) and achieved an SVR; 18 had chronic hepatitis, six of whom at high risk of progression to cirrhosis received interferon-based therapy, with SVR in four, and 12 at a low risk of progression were put on a waiting list for future interferon-free treatment [49].

Similarly, in Israel, where the HCV population is comprised of a majority of immigrants, rapid access to DAAs was provided and high SVR rates were achieved [79, 80].

To this regard, it should be stressed that since the DAA regimen may be different for different HCV genotypes that may vary in different countries, it is important to identify the HCV genotype in anti-HCV-positive immigrants. Table 3 shows the distribution of HCV genotypes according to the geographical areas (Table 3). Depending on the distribution of HCV genotypes in the host and origin countries, the migratory flows may modify the genotypic distribution of HCV in Western Europe [37, 81], especially in the case of prolonged migratory flows, as currently occurs from Africa to Europe [82, 83]. In north Africa HCV-genotype 1 and 2 predominate, except for Libya and Egypt where genotype 4 is the most commonly detected [84, 85, 86]. The distribution of HCV genotypes in sub-Saharan African is varied. In good agreement with previous studies [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89], immigrants from West Africa predominantly carry genotypes 2, 3, and 1, those from the horn of Africa genotypes 4, 2, 5 and 1 and those from Chad genotypes 4, 5, and 3.
Table 3

Distribution of HCV genotype in African and Asian geographical areas

Country

Prevalent HCV genotype

References

North Africa

1 and 2

83–87

Libya and Egypt

4

84–87

Central Africa

4, 5, and 3

88–89

West Africa

2, 3, and 1

90

Horn of Africa

4, 2, 5, and 1

85

South Asia

3

91–93

Thailand

1

92

Vietnam and Japan

1

93

China

1b, 2a, 3 and 6

94

HCV genotype 3 predominates in southern Asian [90, 91, 92, 93, 94], except Thailand [91], Vietnam and Japan [92] where genotype 1 is prevalent. HCV subtypes 1b and 2a predominated in China, but more recently genotype 3 and 6 have spread from southern and western China all over the country [90, 91, 92, 93].

Moreover, in immigrants the therapeutic management is complicated. In fact, when the clinical staging of chronic hepatitis is carried out and treatment is started, a whole series of problems related to clinical, biochemical and virological monitoring begin.

For these reasons, treatment of HCV-RNA-positive subjects should be monitored by physicians with extensive professional experience since immigrants are 2–5 times more likely to die from liver disease [60] than the autochthonous individuals and 2–3 fold more likely to develop HCC [61, 62], with HCC-related mortality higher in the immigrant than in the native-born cohorts [59].

To remove such barriers each HCV-RNA-positive subject should receive a culturally appropriate education program, including the use of brochures in the immigrant’s language and the help of a cultural mediator. For example, the program performed in Ontario, the province in Canada with the largest immigrant population, underlines the short duration, good tolerability and high efficacy of the DAAs. In fact, a similar SVR was observed in immigrant and native DAAs recipients (93% in Canadian-born and 98% in immigrants) [95, 96].

Conclusions

The burden of chronic liver disease in developed countries is now being borne by immigrants who may not have good access to healthcare systems, so despite the extremely high cost of the new DAAs, achieving eradication of HCV infection in immigrants has economic implications and a public health impact. This is also mandatory to obtain the ambitious WHO target of “eradicating” HCV as a public health problem by 2030.

Routine screening of migrants for viral hepatitis is not being performed in the majority of host nations and we think that the Healthcare Authorities should support dedicated screening programs for immigrants, performed with the help of cultural mediators to break down the barriers limiting access to treatments. This may be obtained by using educational brochures and video materials written in the language of the country of origin of the immigrants, explaining in a simple way how HCV is transmitted, how such transmission could be prevented, the clinical progression in time of the associated illness to liver cirrhosis and HCC and how this progression could be prevented by DAA treatments. Once on treatment, adherence to DAA therapy should be accompanied by frequent controls and by the support of a cultural mediator and of skilled physicians. Patients should also be investigated for co-morbidities (HBV coinfection, HIV coinfection, diabetes, mellitus and arterial hypertension) and treated if necessary. For patients with cirrhosis, close monitoring of complications and of HCC development is mandatory even after an SVR has been achieved, including ultrasound examination and liver biochemistry, according to current international guidelines; in addition, monitoring of portal hypertension and other complications is required for cirrhotic patients.

Attention must also be extended to the family nucleus and to the lifestyle of the immigrants with HCV infection, to be of help in the resolution of health and bureaucratic problems; in doing so the role of the cultural mediator is essential.

Notes

Funding

This work was financially supported by Gilead for the study “Evaluation of an innovative model to eliminate HCV infection in a high-risk population of undocumented migrants and low-income refugees” (EUDRACT: 2017–001024-21).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed supporting the findings of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

NC, LA and MP in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript; LO, MM and CS participated in literature review and analysis; ES participated in drafting, critical revision and editing of the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

40249_2019_528_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (612 kb)
Additional file 1: Multilingual abstracts in the five official working languages of the United Nations. (PDF 612 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    McGowan CE, Fried MW. Barriers to hepatitis C treatment. Liver Int. 2012;32:151–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malespin M, Wong S, Siqueira F, Luc B, Ravaee B, Vainder C, et al. Barriers to treatment of hepatitis B in an urban Chinatown community. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:e66–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas DL. Curing hepatitis C with pills: a step toward global control. Lancet. 2010;376:1441–2.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swinkels H, Pottie K, Tugwell P, Rashid M, Narasiah L. Canadian collaboration for immigrant and refugee health (CCIRH). Development of guidelines for recently arrived immigrants and refugees to Canada: Delphi consensus on selecting preventable and treatable conditions. CMAJ. 2011;183:E928–32.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The International Migration Report 2017 (Highlights), 18 December 2017 https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/international-migration-report-2017.html.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    International Migration 2013: Age and sex distribution. Population Facts 2013 https://esa.un.org/unmigration/documents/PF_age_migration_FINAL_10.09.2013.pdf.
  8. 8.
    OECD. International Migration Outlook 2015. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2015-en.
  9. 9.
    Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, Overby LR, Bradley DW, Houghton M. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral-hepatitis genome. Science. 1989;244:359–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith DB, Bukh J, Kuiken C, Muerhoff AS, Rice CM, Stapleton JT, Simmonds P. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology. 2014;59:318–27.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014;61:S45–57.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coppola N, Minichini C, Starace M, Sagnelli C, Sagnelli E. Clinical impact of the hepatitis c virus mutations in the era of directly acting antivirals. J Med Virol. 2016;88:1659–71.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558–67.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniels D, Grytdal S, Wasley A. Surveillance for acute viral hepatitis United States, 2007, vol. 58. 58th ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. p. 1–27.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santantonio T, Medda E, Ferrari C, Fabris P, Cariti G, Massari M, et al. Risk factors and outcome among a large patient cohort with community-acquired acute hepatitis C in Italy. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1154–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corey KE, Ross AS, Wurcel A, Schulze Zur Wiesch J, Kim AY, Lauer GM, et al. Outcomes and treatment of acute hepatitis C virus infection in a United States population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1278–82.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Esteban JI, Sauleda S, Quer J. The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Europe. J Hepatol. 2008;48:148–62.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martinez-Bauer E, Forns X, Armelles M, Planas R, Solà R, Vergara M, et al. Spanish Acute HCV Study Group. Hospital admission is a relevant source of hepatitis C virus acquisition in Spain. J Hepatol. 2008;48:20–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benova L, Mohamoud YA, Calvert C, Abu-Raddad LJ. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:765–73.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiyosawa K, Sodeyama T, Tanaka E, Nakano Y, Furuta S, Nishioka K, et al. Hepatitis C in hospital employees with needlestick injuries. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:367–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report, 2017. 2017. ISBN: 978–92-4-156545-5 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255016/1/9789241565455-eng.pdf?ua=1.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petruzziello A, Marigliano S, Loquercio G, Cozzolino A, Cacciapuoti C. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: An up-date of the distribution and circulation of hepatitis C virus genotypes. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(34):7824–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alter MJ, Margolis HS, Krawczynski K, Judson FN, Mares A, Alexander WJ, et al. The natural history of community-acquired hepatitis C in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1899–905.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poynard T, Ratziu V, Benmanov Y, Di Martino V, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: detection and significance. Semin Liver Dis. 2000;20:47–55.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P. Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Lancet. 1997;349:825–32.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alter HJ, Seeff LB. Recovery, persistence, and sequelae in hepatitis C virus infection: a perspective on long-term outcome. Semin Liver Dis. 2000;20:17–35.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coppola N, Zampino R, Bellini G, Macera M, Marrone A, Pisaturo M, et al. Association between a polymorphism in cannabinoid receptor 2 and severe necroinflammation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:334–40.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coppola N, Zampino R, Cirillo G, Stanzione M, Macera M, Boemio A, et al. TM6SF2 E167K variant is associated with severe steatosis in chronic hepatitis C, regardless of PNAPLA3 polymorphism. Liver Int. 2015;35:1959–63.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Italian Association for the Study of the Liver; Italian Society of Infectious, Tropical Diseases; Italian Society for the Study of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Practice guidelines for the treatment of hepatitis C: recommendations from an AISF/SIMIT/SIMAST Expert Opinion Meeting. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:81–91.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335–74.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coppola N, Pisaturo M, Zampino R, Macera M, Sagnelli C, Sagnelli E. Hepatitis C virus markers in infection by hepatitis C virus: in the era of directly acting antivirals. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:10749–59.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coppola N, Pisaturo M, Tonziello G, Sagnelli C, Sagnelli E, Angelillo IF. Efficacy of Pegylated interferon α-2a and α-2b in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:357.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coppola N, Pisaturo M, Sagnelli C, Sagnelli E, Angelillo IF. Peg-interferon plus ribavirin with or without boceprevir or telaprevir for HCV genotype 1: a meta-analysis on the role of response predictors. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94542.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    HCV Guidance: Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. AASLD-IDSA. https://www.hcvguidelines.org.
  35. 35.
    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2016. J Hepatol. 2017;66:153–94.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Williams IT, Bell BP, Kuhnert W, Alter MJ. Incidence and transmission patterns of acute hepatitis C in the United States, 1982-2006. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:242–8.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma S, Carballo M, Feld JJ, Janssen HL. Immigration and viral hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:515e22.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kamstra R, Azoulay L, Steele R, Klein MB, Greenaway C. Hospitalizations in immigrants and nonimmigrants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection in Québec. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1439–48.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Szaflarski M, Cubbins LA, Ying J. Epidemiology of alcohol abuse among US immigrant populations. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011;13(4):647–58.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kirmayer LJ, Narasiah L, Munoz M, Rashid M, Ryder A, Guzder J, Hassan G, et al. Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: general approach in primary care. CMAJ. 2011;183(12):E959–67.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Greenaway C, Azoulay L, Allard R, Cox J, Tran VA, Abou Chakra CN, et al. A population-based study of chronic hepatitis C in immigrants and non-immigrants in Quebec, Canada. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:140.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rotermann M, Langlois K, Andonov A, Trubnikov M. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections: results from the 2007 to 2009 and 2009 to 2011 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep. 2013;24(11):3–13.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ECDC SCIENTIFIC ADVICE. Systematic review on hepatitis B and C prevalence in the EU/EEA: ECDC; 2016. ISBN: 978–92-9193-982-4; TQ-02-16-837-EN-NGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM. In association with the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus and genotype distribution in immigrants crossing to Europe from north and sub-Saharan Africa. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14(5):517–26.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bottecchia M, Madejón A, Puente S, García-Samaniego J, Rivas P, Herrero D, et al. Detection of hepatitis B virus genotype A3 and primary drug resistance mutations in African immigrants with chronic hepatitis B in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:641–4.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rivas P, Herrero MD, Poveda E, Madejón A, Treviño A, Gutiérrez M, et al. Hepatitis B, C, and D and HIV infections among immigrants from Equatorial Guinea living in Spain. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:789–94.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Urbanus AT, van de Laar TJ, van den Hoek A, Zuure FR, Speksnijder AG, Baaten GG, et al. Hepatitis C in the general population of various ethnic origins living in the Netherlands: should non-Western migrants be screened? J Hepatol. 2011;55:1207–14.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Coppola N, Alessio L, Gualdieri L, Pisaturo M, Sagnelli C, Caprio N, et al. Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus infection in undocumented migrants and refugees in southern Italy, January 2012 to June 2013. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:30009.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sagnelli E, Alessio L, Sagnelli C, Gualdieri L, Pisaturo M, Minichini C, et al. Clinical findings of HCV chronic infection in undocumented immigrants and low-income refugees in three areas of southern Italy. Ann Hepatol. 2018;17:47–53.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tafuri S, Prato R, Martinelli D, Melpignano L, De Palma M, Quarto M, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B, C, HIV and syphilis markers among refugees in Bari, Italy. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:213.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stornaiuolo G, Cuniato V, Cuomo G, Nocera E, Brancaccio G, De Rosa M, et al. Active recruitment strategy in disadvantaged immigrant populations improves the identification of human immunodeficiency but not of hepatitis B or C virus infections. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:62–6.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jablonka A, Solbach P, Wöbse M, Manns MP, Schmidt RE, Wedemeyer H, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies and antigens against hepatitis A-E viruses in refugees and asylum seekers in Germany in 2015. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(8):939–45.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Greenaway C, Thu Ma A, Kloda LA, Klein M, Cnossen S, Schwarzer G, et al. The seroprevalence of hepatitis C antibodies in immigrants and refugees from intermediate and high endemic countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141715.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Weil C, Nwankwo C, Friedman M, Kenet G, Chodick G, Shalev V. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in a large Israeli health maintenance organization. J Med Virol. 2016;88(6):1044–50.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Owiti JA, Greenhalgh T, Sweeney L, Foster GR, Bhui KS. Illness perceptions and explanatory models of viral hepatitis B & C among immigrants and refugees: a narrative systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:151.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ku L, Matani S. Left out: immigrants access to healthcare and insurance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:247–56.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Papatheodoridis G, Tsochatzis E, Hardke S, Wedemeyer H. Barriers to care and treatment for patients with chronic viral hepatitis in Europe: a systematic review. Liver Int. 2014;34:1452–63.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Villagran M, Hajek C, Zhao X, Peterson E, Wittenberg-Lyles E. Communication and culture: predictors of treatment adherence among Mexican immigrant patients. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(3):443–52.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Singh GK, Miller BA. Health, life expectancy, and mortality patterns among immigrant populations in the United States. Can J Public Health. 2004;95:I14–21.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    DesMeules M, Gold J, McDermott S, Cao Z, Payne J, Lafrance B, et al. Disparities in mortality patterns among Canadian immigrants and refugees, 1980-1998: results of a national cohort study. J Immigr Health. 2005;7:221–32.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chen W, Tomlinson G, Krahn M, Heathcote J. Immigrant patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis have a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19:574–80.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chang ET, Keegan THM, Gomez SL, Le GM, Clarke CA, So SK, et al. The burden of liver cancer in Asians and Pacific islanders in the greater San Francisco Bay Area, 1990 through 2004. Cancer. 2007;109:2100–8.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC technical instructions for civil surgeons. http://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/exams/ti/civil/technical-instructions-civil-surgeons.html.
  64. 64.
    Canada I. Immigration medical examination instructions. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/partner/pp/.
  65. 65.
    Van Damme P, Leuridan E, Hendrickx G, Vorsters A, Theeten H, Leino T, et al. Should Europe have a universal hepatitis B vaccination programme? BMJ. 2013;347:f4057.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kretzschmar M, Mangen MJ, van de Laar M, de Wit A. Model based analysis of hepatitis B vaccination strategies in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2009;27:1254–60.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Coppola N, Alessio L, Gualdieri L, Pisaturo M, Sagnelli C, Minichini C, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in undocumented immigrants or refugees in southern Italy: demographic, virological and clinical features. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(1):33.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sagnelli C, Ciccozzi M, Coppola N, Minichini C, Lo Presti A, Starace M, et al. Molecular diversity in irregular or refugee immigrant patients with HBV-genotype-E infection living in the metropolitan area of Naples. J Med Virol. 2017;89(6):1015–24.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sagnelli E, Alessio L, Sagnelli C, Gualdieri L, Pisaturo M, Minichini C, et al. Hepatitis B virus genotype, epidemiological characteristics, and clinical presentation of HBV chronic infection in immigrant population living in Southern Italy. Hepat Mon. 2017;17(8):e13260.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    World Health Organization. New recommendations in the updated WHO guidelines for the screening, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis C infection. Geneva: WHO; 2016. http://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/hepatitis-c-guidelines-2016/en/.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Giordano C, Druyts EF, Garber G, Cooper C. Evaluation of immigration status, race and language barriers on chronic hepatitis C virus infection management and treatment outcomes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21(9):963–8.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yilmaz H, Yilmaz EM, Leblebicioglu H. Barriers to access to hepatitis C treatment. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10(4):308–16.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Perumalswami PV, Factor SH, Kapelusznik L, Friedman SL, Pan CQ, Chang C. Hepatitis outreach network: a practical strategy for hepatitis screening with linkage to care in foreign-born communities. J Hepatol. 2013;58:890–7.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Perumalswami PV, DeWolfe MF, Orabee H, Regab A, Adams M, Kapelusznik L, et al. Hepatitis C screening beyond CDC guidelines in an Egyptian immigrant community. Liver Int. 2014;34:253–8.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Richter C, Ter Beest G, Gisolf EH, VAN Bentum P, Waegemaekers C, Swanink C, et al. Screening for chronic hepatitis B and C in migrants from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, the former soviet republics, and Vietnam in the Arnhem region, The Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;142:2140–6.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Henry L, Nader F, Younossi Y, Hunt S. Adherence to treatment of chronic hepatitis C: from interferon containing regimens to interferon and ribavirin free regimens. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(28):e4151.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Veldhuijzen IK, Wolter R, Rijckborst V, Mostert M, Voeten HA, Cheung Y, Boucher CA, Reijnders JG, de Zwart O, Janssen HL. Identification and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Chinese migrants: results of a project offering on-site testing in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J Hepatol. 2012;57:1171–6.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee S, Zhai S, Zhang GY, Ma XS,  Lu X,  Tan Y, Siu P, Seals B, Ma GX. Factors associated with hepatitis C knowledge before and after an educational intervention among Vietnamese Americans. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2015;8:45–53. Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Avisar N, Heller Y, Weil C, Ben-Baruch A, Potesman-Yona S, Oren R, et al. Multi-disciplinary patient-centered model for the expedited provision of costly therapies in community settings: the case of new medication for hepatitis C. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017;6(1):46.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Weil C, Mehta D, Koren G, Pinsky B, Samp JC, Chodick G, Shalev V. Sustained virological response to ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir treatment for hepatitis C: real-world data from a large healthcare provider. J Viral Hepat. 2018;25(2):144–51.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Magiorkinis G, Magiorkinis E, Paraskevis D, Ho SY, Shapiro B, Pybus OG, et al. The global spread of hepatitis C virus 1a and 1b: a phylodynamic and phylogreographic analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000198.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lancet T. Migrant crisis in the mediterranean. Lancet. 2015;385:1698.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Daw MA, El-Bouzedi A, Dau AA. Geographic distribution of HCV genotypes in Libya and analysis of risk factors involved in their transmission. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:367.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Abdel-Ghaffar TY, Sira MM, El Naghi S. Hepatitis C genotype 4: the past, present, and future. World J Hepatol. 2015;7:2792e810.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pybus OG, Drummond AJ, Nakano T, Robertson BH, Rambaut A. The epidemiology and iatrogenic transmission of hepatitis C virus in Egypt: a bayesian coalescent approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20:381–7.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kamal SN, Nasser IA. Hepatitis C genotype 4: what we know and what we don’t yet know. Hepatology. 2008;47:1371–83.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Abreha T, Woldeamanuel Y, Pietsch C, Maier M, Asrat D, Abebe A, et al. Genotypes and viral load of hepatitis C virus among persons attending a voluntary counseling and testing center in Ethiopia. J Med Virol. 2011;83:776e82.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Agwale SM, Tanimoto L, Womack C, Odama L, Leung K, Duey D, et al. Prevalence of HCV coinfection in HIV-infected individuals in Nigeria and characterization of HCV genotypes. J Clin Virol. 2004;31(1):S3–6.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Zeba MTA, Sanou M, Bisseye C, Kiba A, Nagalo BM, Djigma FW, et al. Characterization of hepatitis C virus genotype among blood donors at the regional blood transfusion centre of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Blood Transfus. 2014;12:s54e7.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chowdhury A, Santra A, Chaudhuri S, Dhali GK, Chaudhuri S, Maity SG, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in the general population: a community-based study in West Bengal, India. Hepatology. 2003;37:802–9.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tokita H, Okamoto H, Luengrojanakul P, Vareesangthip K, Chainuvati T, Iizuka H, et al. Hepatitis C virus variants from Thailand classifiable into five novel genotypes in the sixth (6b), seventh (7c, 7d) and ninth (9b, 9c) major genetic groups. J Gen Virol. 1995;76:2329–35.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Shinji T, Kyaw YY, Gokan K, Tanaka Y, Ochi K, Kusano N, et al. Analysis of HCV genotypes from blood donors shows three new HCV type 6 subgroups exist in Myanmar. Acta Med Okayama. 2004;58:135–42.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rong X, Xu R, Xiong H, Wang M, Huang K, Chen Q, et al. Increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus subtype 6a in China: a comparison between 2004-2007 and 2008-2011. Arch Virol. 2014;159:3231–7.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Morice Y, Cantaloube JF, Beaucourt S, Barbotte L, De Gendt S, Goncales FL, et al. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus subtype 3a in injecting users. J Med Virol. 2006;78:1296–303.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, Dion D, Murata G, Deming P, et al. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment–extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52:1124–33.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cooper CL, Thavorn K, Damian E, Corsi DJ. Hepatitis C virus infection outcomes among immigrants to Canada: a retrospective cohort analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16:720–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Coppola
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Loredana Alessio
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Onorato
    • 1
  • Caterina Sagnelli
    • 1
  • Margherita Macera
    • 1
  • Evangelista Sagnelli
    • 1
  • Mariantonietta Pisaturo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious DiseasesUniversity of CampaniaNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Infectious Diseases UnitAORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano di CasertaCasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations