Advertisement

Numerical model of fiber wetting with finite resin volume

  • Michael Yeager
  • Suresh G Advani
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Integrated Computational Engineering of Composites

Abstract

The partial wetting of cylindrical surfaces is encountered in many industrial applications such as composites manufacturing, MEMS, hair care products, and textile engineering. Understanding the impact of key parameters such as resin and fiber surface interaction properties and the geometric arrangement of the fibers on wetting would lead to tailoring a desired interface between the resin and the fiber surface. A three-dimensional model of resin wetting a single fiber is presented. This model is then extended to study a finite volume of resin wetting fibers in square and triangular packing arrangements. The impact of changing wetting properties and fiber volume fraction is examined for each packing arrangement.

Keywords

Wetting Contact angle Computational multiphase flow Composites 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-12-2-0022. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

References

  1. 1.
    Lavi B, Marmur A (2004) The exponential power law: partial wetting kinetics and dynamic contact angles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 250(1–3):409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carroll BJ (1976) The accurate measurement of contact angle, phase contact areas, drop volume, and Laplace excess pressure in drop-on-fiber systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 57(3):488–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mchale G, Newton M (2002) Global geometry and the equilibrium shapes of liquid drops on fibers. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206(1–3):79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu X-F, Dzenis YA (2006) Droplet on a fiber: geometrical shape and contact angle. Acta Mech 185(3–4):215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eral HB, De Ruiter J, De Ruiter R, Jung Min O, Semprebon C, Brinkmann M, Mugele F (2011) Drops on functional fibers: from barrels to clamshells and back. Soft Matter 7(11):5138–5143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bedarkar A, Xiang-Fa W, Vaynberg A (2010) Wetting of liquid droplets on two parallel filaments. Appl Surf Sci 256(23):7260–7264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vega M-J, Seveno D, Lemaur G, Adão M-H, De Coninck J (2005) Dynamics of the rise around a fiber: experimental evidence of the existence of several time scales. Langmuir 21(21):9584–9590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slawig, Thomas (2006) PDE-constrained control using COMSOL Multiphysics – control of the Navier–Stokes equations. Tech. no. 2005/26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osher S, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79(1):12–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olsson E, Kreiss G (2005) A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J Comput Phys 210(1):225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    COMSOL Inc., COMSOL Microfluidics User’s Guide. 2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lafaurie B, Nardone C, Scardovelli R, Zaleski S, Zanetti G (1994) Modelling merging and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER. J Comput Phys 113(1):134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Gennes P-G, Brochard-Wyart F, Quéré D (2004) Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernet N, Bourban P-E, Maanson J-AE (2000) On the characterization of wetting and adhesion in glass fiber-PA12 composites. J Thermoplastic Compos Mater 13(6):434–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hocking LM (1976) A moving fluid interface on a rough surface. J Fluid Mech 76(04):801–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andrienko D, Dünweg B, Vinogradova OI (2003) Boundary slip as a result of a prewetting transition. J Chem Phys 119(24):13106–13112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Yeager and Advani; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Center for Composite MaterialsUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations