Advertisement

Bioremoval of reactive dye Remazol Navy by kefir grains

  • Ali Osman Erdoğdular
  • Dilek Kılıç AparEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

Potential use of living and non-living kefir grains (small, gelatinous white/yellow irregularly shaped masses consist of live bacteria and yeasts) on removal of reactive dye Remazol Navy RGB from aqueous solutions were investigated. Experiments were carried out under different process conditions in order to optimize and model the bioremoval processes. At all conditions the living kefir grains exhibited higher dye removal efficiencies than the non-living grains. In 180 min, 96.3% and 79.4% dye removal was obtained with living and non-leaving kefir grains respectively, at pH 2, 25 °C for 100 mg/L initial dye concentration by using 2.4 g/L kefir grain. Maximum adsorption capacities by living and inactivated kefir grains were obtained at 400 mg/L initial dye concentration as 134.59 and 56.92 mg/g respectively. Consecutive batch studies show that the living kefir grains could be reused over at least 5 cycles with high dye removal efficiency without any nutrition supplement. The biosorption kinetics both for living and non-living kefir grains were best described with pseudo-first-order kinetic model. On the other hand the biosorption equilibrium for living and non-living kefir grains were better defined by Temkin and Langmuir isotherm models respectively. Results suggest that the kefir grains could be used efficiently, eco-friendly and economically for removal of dyes from aqueous solutions.

Keywords

Bioaccumulation Biosorption Kefir grain Kinetic Reactive dye 

List of symbols

bT

Temkin isotherm constant related to the heat of adsorption (J g/mol mg)

C

constant (mg/g)

Ce

equilibrium dye concentration (mg/L)

C0

initial dye concentration (mg/L)

Ct

dye concentrations at processing time t (mg/L)

k1

pseudo first order rate constant (1/min)

k2

pseudo second order rate constant (g/mg min)

kp

intraparticle rate constant (mg/g min1/2)

KF

Freundlich constant (mg1−1/n L1/n/g)

KL

Langmuir constant (L/mg)

KT

Temkin constant (L/mg)

n−1

Freundlich constant related to adsorption intensity (–)

α

initial adsorption rate (mg/g min)

β

Elovich constant (g/mg)

M

weight of dry kefir grains (g)

qe

amount of dye removed per unit mass of kefir grains at equilibrium (mg/g)

qm

maximum dye removal capacity (mg/g)

qt

amount of dye removed per unit mass of kefir grains at time t (mg/g)

R

gas constant (J/mol K)

R2

coefficient of determination (–)

R%

percentage dye removal (–)

s

standard error (–)

t

time (min)

T

temperature (K)

V

volume (L)

Introduction

Dyes are synthetic chemical compounds widely used in dyestuff, textile, leather, paper, plastic, cosmetics, food and pharmaceutical industries. Worldwide production of dyes are approximately 700,000 tons/year and due to inefficiencies of the colouring processes most of the dyes are lost in the effluents of the mentioned industries. For instance, approximately 280,000 tons of the dyes are emitted annually from the textile industry [1, 2, 3]. The pollution by dyes leads to reduction of sunlight penetration in waters and decrease photosynthetic activity and dissolved oxygen concentration for aquatic life. Moreover, most of dyes and their breakdown products are toxic, carcinogenic, or allergenic [4, 5, 6]. Hence it is necessary to remove the dyes and their breakdown pollutants from wastewaters to safeguard the environment and living organisms.

Several physical or chemical treatment processes have been used with varying degree of success for removal of dyes from wastewater. Recently, studies focused on microbial biomass as treatment by microorganisms is eco-friendly and cost effective [4, 7]. Several bacteria [2, 8, 9, 10, 11], yeast [12, 13, 14, 15, 16], algae [1, 4, 17, 18, 19] and fungi [6, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] have been used for dye removal from waste water and reported as potential bioadsorbents/biodegraders for toxic compounds. A summary of the most recent studies on reactive dye removal that performed with various microorganisms was presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Recent studies on reactive dye removal by various microorganisms

References

Microorg.

Dye

Parameters

Percentage dye removal/results

[11]

Bacterial consortium

Reactive Green 19

Dye conc.: 100 mg/L

Temperature: 25–45 °C

pH: 5–10

Contact time: 24 h

Additional source: glucose and yeast extract, 0–2.5% (weight/volume), pH7.2, 25–45 °C

97.1% in 24 h at optimum conditions: 32.04 °C, pH 8.3, 1.16 mg/100 ml yeast extract conc

[15]

Waste beer yeast slurry

Reactive Red 239

Reactive Black B

Direct Blue 85

Adsorbent dosage : 0.63–3.12 g/L

pH: 2–10

Temperature: 30 °C

Dye conc.: 100–350 mg/L

Contact time: 0–140 min

Max.96, 99 and 100% for DB85, RR239 and RBB respectively at pH2, 100 mg/L dye conc., 3.12 g biomass/L

Equilibrium times: 30 min for RR239 and RBB and 60 min for DB85 at pH2, 100 mg/L dye conc., with 0.63 g biomass/L

Max adsorption capacity: 139 and 160.8 mg/g for DB85 and RR239 at 250 mg/L dye conc. and 158.7 mg/g for RBB at 300 mg/L dye conc. at pH2, with 0.63 g biomass/L

[16]

Candida boidinii MM 4035

Reactive Black 5

Dye conc: 200 mg/L

Temperature: 25 °C

Adsorbent dosage: 10% (v)

Contact time: 24 h

Carbon sources: 0.8 g/L, glucose, sucrose, glycerol

NitrogenSources: 0.05 g/L, (NH4)2SO4, urea, NH4NO3

Culture media components:

glucose, yeast extract, urea, KH2PO4, MgSO4·7H2O

Optimum dye removal and biomass production with glucose as carbon/energy source

No significant effect of nitrogen sources

Significant effect of tested culture components on decoloration:

 100% in 24 h with 3% glucose, 0.0565% urea, 0.125% yeast extract, 0.25% KH2PO4, 0.025% MgSO4·7H2O

 Max biomass production 9.07 g/L at 24 h with 3% glucose, 0.1695% urea, 0.125% yeast extract, 0.75% KH2PO4, 0.025% MgSO4·7H2O

[19]

Nannochl. oceanica

Reactive Violet 5

Adsorbent dosage: 50 mg(wet)/20 ml

Temperature: 10–40 °C

pH:8

Contact time:72 h

Max. adsorption capacity: 115 mg/g at 40 °C

[26]

Panus tigrinus

Reactive Blue 19

Dye conc.: 50–150 mg/L

Contact time: 30–90 min

Temperature: 26 °C

pH: 2–6

Adsorbent dosage:15 g/L

Max. 83.12% at 50 mg/L dye conc., pH2, in 90 min

Min 13.18% at 50 mg/L dye conc., pH6, in 30 min

[27]

Aspergillus fumigatus

Reactive Blue 268

Culture age: 3–12 days

Temperature: 27–45 °C

pH: 3–9

Dye conc:0.025–0.150 g/L

Carbon source: 10 g/L, glucose, dextrose, sucrose, starch

Nitrogen source: 2 g/L, yeast extract, peptone,

beef extract, ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate

Max. appx.95% with 6-day-old fungal inoculums

Max. appx. 99% at pH 6, 30 °C, after 4 days

Among the carbon sources max decolorization (appx 96%) with sucrose, among the nitrogen sources 100% with ammonium chloride (after 4 day, 30 °C, pH 6)

Complete decolorization within 2 days at optimized conditions

65% decolorization with dead biomass at an adsorbent dose of 10 g/L within 6 days

[28]

Marasmius sp.

BBKAV79

Reactive

Blue 171

Dye conc.: 50–200 mg/L at 40 °C

pH: 3–9 at 50 mg/L dye cons.

Temperature: 30–50 °C

Carbon source: maltose, sucrose, glucose, lactose at 40 °C, 50 mg/L dye cons.

Nitrogen source: peptone, yeast extract, urea, ammonium chloride at 40 °C, 50 mg/L dye cons.

Contact time: 24 h

91.25% at 50 mg/L dye cons.

97.27% at pH5

95.12% at 40 °C

100% with sucrose

75.68% with glucose

35.14% with maltose

25.86% with lactose

100% with peptone

55.68% with yeast extract

0% with urea and ammonium chloride

[29]

Phlebia sp. and Paecilomyces formosus

Reactive Blue19

Reactive Black 5

Dye conc: 0.1 g/L

Temperature: 28 °C

Contact time: 15 days

On solid-medium:

 91% for RB19 and 100% for RB5 with Phlebia sp.

 75% for RB19 and 97% for RB5 with P. formosus

In liquid-medium:

 79% for RB19 and 91% for RB5 with Phlebia sp.

 15% for RB19 and 92% for RB5 with P. formosus

The kefir grains (starter culture for the probiotic fermented milk drink kefir) are small, gelatinous white/yellow irregularly shaped masses consist of live bacteria (lactic acid bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and acetic acid bacteria) and yeasts (consist of Kluyveromyces, Candida, Saccharomyces and Pichia) in a slimy polysaccharide matrix and are responsible for lactic acid and alcoholic fermentation. Traditional production of kefir drink involves inoculation of milk with a variable amount of grains and fermentation at 20–25 °C for a period between 18 and 24 h [30, 31]. During the fermentation kefir grains increases and in a few day the amount get excess for a specified amount of beverage production and require to remove the excess amount in order to standardization of the product. For instance, the kefir biomass increase was reported as 1294% and 1226% for 10 day consecutive fermentation in 100 ml milk and whey respectively [30]. Whey is a dairy liquid waste which is produced in large quantities throughout the world. Production of kefir-like whey beverages has been reported in several works. Hence whey can be used to produce kefir grains, so it can be converted to added value products while the kefir grains are produced cheaply [30, 32]. As a result, as a side product (or waste) the excess amount of kefir biomass obtained from milk or whey fermentation can be evaluated in different areas.

As mentioned, potential use of many bacteria and yeast for removing the dyes from aqueous solutions have been investigated. Although kefir grains consist of several live bacteria and yeasts together, and could be easily produced with a very low cost or obtained as a waste from kefir-beverage industries, their potential use on dye removal has not been reported yet. Therefore in the present work the potential use of living and non-living kefir grains on the removal of reactive dye Remazol Navy RGB were investigated. Experiments were carried out under different process conditions to optimize the dye removal processes. The reuse potentials of the living and non-living grains were examined. Also modelling studies were performed to determine the most appropriate biosorption kinetic and isotherm models.

Materials and methods

Kefir grains and growth conditions

Kefir grains, used as starter culture was obtained from Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dairy Technology Department (Izmir/Turkey). The grains was grown in whey solution, at room temperature. Whey solution prepared to contain 5% lactose (as the milk which is the natural culturing medium consist of 5% lactose) by using whey powder which was obtained from Maybi Company, (Tekirdağ/Turkey). During the study the propagation medium was changed daily. In order to obtain non-living kefir grains, the bacteria and yeast in kefir grains were inactivated by thermal treatment with leaving the grains in an oven at 70 °C for 5 h.

Dyes and chemicals

Reactive dye Remazol Navy RGB was obtained from DyStar (Istanbul, Turkey). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Istanbul, Turkey).

Effect of different process conditions

Experiments were carried out in batch mode to investigate the effect of various parameters such as initial pH (2–8), temperature (18–39 °C) and initial dye concentration (50–400 mg/L). 100 ml working dye solution was heated up to the desired temperature and after the pH of the solution was adjusted (with 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH solutions) the flask is kept in temperature controlled shaker. Then dye removal process is initiated by the addition of kefir grains. The shaking rate was kept constant at 120 rpm. During the treatments samples were taken from the solution at timed intervals to determine the residual dye concentration.

Reuse of kefir grains

0.24 g kefir grains was added into 100 ml dye solution (initial dye concentration: 100 mg/L, initial pH = 2) in Erlenmayer flask and kept in temperature controlled shaker at 120 rpm and 25 °C. After 24 h treatment, dye concentration was measured and solution was discharged while used kefir grains were retained. New dye solution was added into the flask for next biosorption batch. Consecutively seven batches were carried out.

Analytical methods

Residual dye concentration was determined by analysis of samples absorbance using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-150-02). The absorbance of samples was measured at λmax of the dye which is 616 nm. The absorbance values were converted to the concentrations according to the calibration curve that constructed by preparing reactive dye samples in the concentration range from 0 to 100 mg/L and measuring their absorbance values at 616 nm. As a result of linear regression analysis, to convert the absorbance values to the concentrations the following equation was obtained with the coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.9998.
$$C_{t} \,\left( {{\text{mg}}/{\text{L}}} \right) = 33.259 \times \left( {\text{Absorbance}} \right) \times {\text{Dilution}}\,{\text{Factor}}$$
(1)
Percentage dye removal (R%) and biosorption capacity (qt) of kefir grains were determined by the following equations:
$${\text{R\% }} = \frac{{{\text{C}}_{0} - {\text{C}}_{\text{t}} }}{{{\text{C}}_{0} }} \times 100$$
(2)
$${\text{q}}_{\text{t}} = \frac{{{\text{V}}\left( {{\text{C}}_{0} - {\text{C}}_{\text{t}} } \right)}}{\text{M}}$$
(3)

Characterisation of kefir grains

A zetasizer (Malvern, ZS MPT2) was used to determine the zeta potential of kefir grains. After drying at 45 °C for 24 h, the kefir grains were grinded and dispersed in 10 ml water and insert in ZS MPT2. The auto titration was carried out with 0.025 M HCl, 0.25 M HCl and 0.25 M NaOH for 2–10 pH range by 0.5 step increases.

Morphological properties of kefir grains before and after biosorption was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss EVO LS 10). For observations samples were coated with Pt after drying at 45 °C for 24 h.

Modelling studies

In order to determine the kinetics of the dye removal processes the kinetic data obtained were analyzed using pseudo first order (Eq. 4), pseudo second order (Eq. 5), intraparticle diffusion (Eq. 6) and Elovich (Eq. 7) kinetic models.
$$q_{t} = q_{e} \left[ {1 - \exp \left( { - k_{1} t} \right)} \right]$$
(4)
$$\frac{\text{t}}{{{\text{q}}_{\text{t}} }} = \frac{ 1}{{{\text{k}}_{ 2} {\text{q}}_{\text{e}}^{ 2} }}{ + }\frac{ 1}{{{\text{q}}_{\text{e}} }}{\text{t}}$$
(5)
$$q_{t} = k_{p} t^{1/2} + C$$
(6)
$$q_{t} = \frac{1}{\beta }\ln \left( {\alpha \beta } \right) + \frac{1}{\beta }\ln t$$
(7)
To further explore the mechanism of dye biosorption the experimental data were analysed by Langmuir (Eq. 8), Freundlih (Eq. 9) and Temkin (Eq. 10) isotherm models.
$$\frac{1}{{{\text{q}}_{\text{e}} }} = \frac{1}{{{\text{q}}_{\text{m}} }} + \left( {\frac{1}{{q_{m} K_{L} }}} \right)\frac{1}{{C_{e} }}$$
(8)
$${ \ln }q_{e} = { \ln }K_{F} + \frac{1}{n} lnC_{e}$$
(9)
$$q_{e} = \frac{RT}{{b_{T} }}\ln K_{T} + \frac{RT}{{b_{T} }}\ln C_{e}$$
(10)

Results and discussion

Optimization of biosorption

The point of zero charge (PZC) or isoelectric point of adsorbent is the pH that cause a net zero charge on the adsorbent surface. The PZC of kefir grains is obtained as pH 4.46 by measuring zeta potentials at various pH levels (results are available as Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

The effect of initial pH on removal of reactive dye Remazol Navy by living and inactivated kefir grains were presented in Fig. 1a. Maximum dye removal by living and inactivated kefir grains were obtained at pH 2 as 96.3% and 79.4% respectively. The removal of the dyes by living and inactivated grains drastically decreased to 11.38% and 1.03% as pH was increased to 8. Kefir is an acidic, viscous, lightly carbonated dairy beverage and it is known that the living kefir grains are stable in a wide pH range, since during the fermentation the pH of the milk decrease from 6.8 up to 3.3 [30]. As the decrease in dye removal efficiency was also observed with non-living kefir grains it can be stated that these decrease is not related with the inactivation of the active microflora of kefir grains. This effect is related to the electrostatic interaction of the dye molecules with the adsorbent surface. The PZC of kefir grains was obtained as pH 4.46. Hence below pH 4.46 the surface of grains positively charged that was favourable for attracting the anionic dye. As the pH of the medium increases the number of positively charged sites decreases on the adsorbent surface that render the dye adsorption less favourable. Similar pH trends were reported for removal of Reactive Red 198 by Potamogeton crispus [7], Reactive Blue 49 by waste beer yeast [12], Reactive Blue 19 by Panus tigrinus [26] and Reactive Red 239, Reactive Black B, Direct Blue 85 by waste beer yeast [15].
Fig. 1

Dye removal % by kefir grains: a at different pH values (Cdye = 100 mg/L, CKefir = 2.4 g/L, T = 25 °C), b at different temperatures (Cdye = 100 mg/L, CKefir = 2.4 g/L, pH = 3), c at different initial dye concentrations (CKefir = 1.2 g/L, T = 25 °C, pH = 2), d in consecutive batch processes (CKefir = 2.4 g/L, Cdye = 100 mg/L, T = 25 °C, pH = 2)

Higher dye removal percentages were obtained at all pH values with living kefir grains as compared with the inactivated ones. This result may be attributed to the active microflora of the living kefir.

The effect of temperature on the biosorption of Remazol Navy by living and inactivated kefir grains were presented in Fig. 1b.

A significant change on dye removal due to the temperature increase was not observed in temperature range 18–32 °C with living kefir grains. The percentage dye removal by living grains in this range were obtained appx. as 42%. But with a further increase on temperature from 32 to 39 °C, the percentage dye removal was significantly rise to 70%. On the other hand, the increase on temperature, from 32 to 39 °C, does not effect the efficiencies of the inactivated kefir grains and almost the same results were obtained at all temperatures examined. The different temperature trends obtained with living and inactivated grains support the idea the active microflora of the living kefir grains contributes to dye removal.

Initial dye concentration is an important parameter in adsorption as the concentration difference is the driving force to overcome the mass transfer resistances between the solid and liquid phases. The effect of initial dye concentration on the biosorption was investigated in the range from 50 to 400 mg/L at pH 2 at 25 °C by using 1.2 g (dry weight)/L kefir grains. The results were presented in Fig. 1c.

Percentage dye removal by living and inactivated grains decreased while the adsorption capacities increased as the initial dye concentration increased. The biosorption capacities by living and inactivated kefir grains respectively reached maximum values of 134.59 mg/g and 56.92 mg/g at 400 mg/L initial dye concentration. The biosorption capacity increased with the increase of dye concentration as the mass transfer driving force increased. The decrease in the percentage dye removal with increasing dye concentration might be caused by the saturation of the binding sites on the biomass surface.

Reuse potential

Figure 1d shows the results of consecutive batch biosorption processes of Remazol Navy by living and inactivated kefir grains. The dye removal efficiency of the living kefir grains for 4 cycles maintained at a high level (above 90%) and in subsequent 3 cycles decreased to 76.01, 59.73 and 42.02% while the efficiency of the inactivated grains decreased gradually in 3 cycles. At the end of the 7th cycle the living kefir grains were cultured and it was observed that they maintain their vitality and growth ability. The results obtained from consecutive batch studies are promising since the experiments were carried out without any nutrition supplement for living kefir grains or regeneration for inactivated ones and indicate that the reusability of kefir grains can be improved and feasible for long term usage.

Kinetics of dye removal

The kinetic data obtained at different process conditions were presented in Fig. 2. Pseudo first order, pseudo second order, intraparticle diffusion and Elovich kinetic models were tested to determine the kinetics of the dye removal processes. The coefficient of determination (R2) is a measure of the degree of fit. The high values of the determination coefficients R2 (> 0.90) indicate a high degree of correlation between the experimental and model values. The experimental data (except for experiments carried out at pH 6 and pH 8 with inactivated kefir grains) showed well compatibility with the pseudo first order (0.93 < R2 < 0.99), pseudo second order (0.82 < R2 < 0.99) and Elovich kinetic (0.92 < R2 < 0.99) models but did not fit well to intraparticle diffusion model (0.69 < R2 < 0.99). However, as the obtained data for the models were evaluated as a whole for different experimental conditions, it was seen that the pseudo first order kinetic model provided the best fits (based on R2 values) among the three models. The plots of the first order kinetic model were shown on the Fig. 2 (the solid lines on the figures represents the model). The constants (pseudo first order rate constants, k1 and theoretical values of amount of dye removed per unit mass of kefir grains, qe) and statistical data (coefficient of determinations, R2 and standard deviations, s) obtained for the model were given in Table 2.
Fig. 2

Kinetic data (points represent experimental data, solid lines represent pseudo-first-order model data) of removal of Remazol Navy: at different pHs by a living and b inactivated grains (Cdye = 100 mg/L, CKefir = 2.4 g/L, T = 25 °C); at different temperatures by c living and d inactivated granis (Cdye = 100 mg/L, CKefir = 2.4 g/L, pH = 3); at different initial dye concentrations by e living and f inactivated grains (CKefir = 1.2 g/L, T = 25 °C, pH = 2)

Table 2

Pseudo-first-order kinetic model parameters for removal of Remazol Navy by kefir grains at different process conditions

 

Living grains

Inactivated grains

k1 (min−1)

qe (mg/g)

s

R2

k1 (min−1)

qe (mg/g)

s

R2

pH

        

 pH2

0.0263

39.936

0.8725

0.9981

0.0266

31.252

1.7494

0.9869

 pH2.5

0.0143

29.995

1.0343

0.9942

0.0119

22.318

0.8509

0.9923

 pH3

0.0250

16.217

1.1072

0.9810

0.0186

17.225

0.9280

0.9873

 pH4

0.0378

11.005

0.7914

0.9793

0.0956

3.993

0.4647

0.9307

 pH6

0.0396

6.828

0.3660

0.9886

0.5485

1.171

0.2371

0.8187

 pH8

0.0598

4.852

0.3431

0.9809

0.1146

0.055

0.2028

0.6590

Temp.

 18 °C

0.0363

15.520

1.0143

0.9826

0.0260

15.3778

0.8574

0.9869

 25 °C

0.0250

16.217

1.1072

0.9810

0.0186

17.2250

0.9280

0.9873

 32 °C

0.0293

16.175

1.1348

0.9796

0.0265

16.1644

0.7997

0.9899

 39 °C

0.0241

27.738

1.0280

0.9946

0.0297

14.8776

0.9772

0.9817

Dye conc.

 50 mg/L

0.0181

40.987

1.1384

0.9969

0.0099

32.8742

2.0170

0.9832

 75 mg/L

0.0122

58.928

2.0451

0.9952

0.0089

43.890

2.6351

0.9829

 100 mg/L

0.0124

69.707

3.0545

0.9922

0.0090

46.6072

2.7159

0.9846

 200 mg/L

0.0162

92.763

6.1896

0.9809

0.0112

48.3197

3.3129

0.9794

 400 mg/L

0.0214

123.417

8.5246

0.9792

0.0123

52.4215

4.5461

0.9656

The well compatibility of the experimental data with three models suggest that the biosorption of Remazol Navy by kefir grains are complex and may involve more than one mechanism. As a result of the highest compatibility of the experimental data with the pseudo-first-order kinetic model it could be concluded that the rate of occupation of sorption sites is proportional to the amount of available active sites on the kefir grains. Since the experimental data did not show well compatibility with the intraparticle diffusion model, the intraparticle diffusion is not the rate controlling step and the adsorption kinetics may be controlled by two or more steps. Further the compatibility of the experimental data with the Elovich kinetic model suggest that chemisorption might also be the controlling step during the biosorption processes.

Biosorption isotherm

Adsorption isotherms investigate the interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent at equilibrium and help to understand the mechanism of the adsorption process. In the present study, the experimental data were modelled with the Langmuir, Freundlih and Temkin isotherms. The results were presented in Fig. 3. Although all models showed high compliance with the experimental data, based on R2 values it can be concluded that the biosorption of reactive dye onto living grains is better defined by Temkin model while its biosorption onto inactivated grains is better defined by the Langmuir model.
Fig. 3

Linearized form of isotherm models; a Langmuir, b Freundlich, c Temkin

The high compatibility of the experimental data with the Langmuir model suggested the occurrence of monolayer biosorption of reactive dye on homogeneous biomass surface. The determined KL values, fell within 0–1, indicates favourable adsorption of Remazol Navy onto the kefir grains. The Freundlih model also provided reasonably good fit with the experimental data suggested heterogeneous adsorbent surface. Since the experimental data showed well compatibility with both models it can be concluded that the surface of kefir grains are made up of homogenous and heterogeneous adsorption patches. The determined values of exponents, n, for the Freundlich model are between 1 and 10, indicating dyes were favourably adsorbed onto kefir grains. On the other hand the good representation of equilibrium data with the Temkin model suggested that adsorption heat of all molecules in the layer decreases linearly with coverage.

The surface of the kefir grains was characterized by SEM before and after the biosorption. The SEM images were shown in Fig. 4. As seen from the images the surface of the kefir grains is rough and has macro and micro pores and after biosorption the surface of the grains became less rough since the reactive dye was diffused into pores and was completely covered the grain surface.
Fig. 4

SEM images of kefir grains a before and b after biosorption

The result of UV–Vis spectral scan of dye solutions before and after 180 min treatment with living and inactivated grains (results are available as Additional file 1: Fig. S2) showed that the main peak in visible region at 612 nm in untreated dye solution disappeared in living kefir grain treated solution and decreased in inactivated kefir grain treated solution. These results indicate the dye removal is mainly through biosorption. On the other hand the minor peak observed at 286 nm in untreated dye solution shift to 263 in living kefir treated one which indicates the decolourization may also include biodegradation.

Kefir grains were used for dye removal for the first time in this study. Effects of various parameters on removal of reactive dye Remazol Navy by living and inactivated kefir grains were evaluated. The living kefir grains exhibited higher dye removal efficiencies compared with the inactivated grains. 96.3% dye removal was obtained with living grains in a relatively short contact time of 180 min. The results of consecutive batch biosorption processes show that the living kefir grains are reusable and their reusability can be improved further. Kefir grains offered great potential as an efficient, eco-friendly and cost effective adsorbent for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions. The present results in this study will encourage the further studies of decolourization ability of kefir grains.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

DKA designed the study. AOE performed 90% of the experiments. DKA performed 10% of the experiments. Both authors analyzed the data. DKA wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13765_2019_429_MOESM1_ESM.docx (255 kb)
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Point of zero charge of kefir grains. Fig. S2. UV-Vis spectra of dye solutions before and after 180 minutes treatments.

References

  1. 1.
    Kousha M, Daneshvar E, Sohrabı MS, Koutahzadeh N, Khataee AR (2012) Optimization of CI Acid Black 1 biosorption by Cystoseira indica and Gracilaria persica biomasses from aqueous solutions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 67:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mona S, Kaushik A, Kaushik CP (2011) Biosorption of reactive dye by waste biomass of Nostoc linckia. Ecol Eng 37:1589–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ooi J, Lee LY, Hiew BYZ, Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, Lim SS, Gan S (2017) Assessment of fish scales waste as a low cost and eco-friendly adsorbent for removal of an azo dye: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 245:656–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Esmaeli A, Jokar M, Kousha M, Daneshvar E, Zilouei H, Karimi K (2013) Acidic dye wastewater treatment onto a marine macroalga, Nizamuddina zanardini (Phylum: Ochrophyta). Chem Eng J 217:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cengiz S, Tanrıkulu F, Aksu S (2012) An alternative source of adsorbent for the removal of dyes from textile waters: Posidonia oceanica (L.). Chem Eng J 189:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esmaeli A, Kalantari M (2012) Bioremoval of an azo textile dye, Reactive Red 198, by Aspergillus flavus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 8:1125–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulnaz O, Sahmurova A, Kama S (2011) Removal of Reactive Red 198 from aqueous solution by Potamogeton crispus. Chem Eng J 174:579–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du LN, Zhao M, Li G, Zhao XP, Zhao YH (2012) Highly efficient decolorization of Malachite Green by a novel Micrococcus sp strain BD15. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:2898–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saratale RG, Gandhi SS, Purankar MV, Kurade MB, Govindwar SP, Oh SE, Saratale GD (2013) Decolorization and detoxification of sulfonated azo dye C.I. Remazol Red and textile effluent by isolated Lysinibacillus sp. RGS. J Biosci Bioeng 115:658–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Araghi MS, Olya ME, Marandi R, Siadat SD (2016) Investigation of enhanced biological dye removal of colored wastewater in a lab-scale biological activated carbon process. Appl Biol Chem 59(3):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Das A, Mishra S (2017) Removal of textile dye reactive green-19 using bacterial consortium: process optimization using response surface methodology and kinetics study. J Environ Chem Eng 5:612–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang B, Guo X (2011) Reuse of waste beer yeast sludge for biosorptive decolorization of Reactive Blue 49 from aqueous solution. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1297–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu YH, Hu Y, Xie ZW, Feng SX, Li B, Mi XM (2011) Characterization of biosorption process of Acid Orange 7 on waste Brewery’s Yeast. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163:882–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim TY, Lee JW, Cho SY (2015) Application of residual brewery yeast for adsorption removal of Reactive Orange 16 from aqueous solution. Adv Powder Technol 26:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castro KC, Cossolin AS, Reis HCO, Morais EB (2017) Biosorption of anionic textile dyes from aqueous solution by yeast slurry from brewery. Braz Arch Biol Technol 60:e1716010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martorell MM, Pajot HF, Ahmed PM, Figueroa LIC (2017) Biodecoloration of Reactive Black 5 by the methylotrophic yeast Candida boidinii MM 4035. J Environ Sci 53:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El-Kassas HY, Sallam LA (2014) Bioremediation of the textile waste effluent by Chlorella vulgaris. Egypt J Aquat Res 40:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vafaei F, Khataee AR, Jannatkhah M (2013) Biosorption of three textile dyes from contaminated water by filamentous green algal Spirogyra sp.: kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 83:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zuorro A, Maffei G, Lavecchia R (2017) Kinetic modeling of azo dye adsorption on non-living cells of Nannochloropsis oceanica. J Environ Chem Eng 5:4121–4127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaushik P, Malik A (2011) Process optimization for efficient dye removal by Aspergillus lentulus FJ172995. J Hazard Mater 185:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gül UD, Dönmez G (2012) Effects of dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide surfactant on decolorization of Remazol Blue by a living Aspergillus versicolor strain. J Surfactants Deterg 15:797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin Y, He X, Han G, Tian Q, Hu W (2012) Removal of Crystal Violet from aqueous solution using powdered mycelial biomass of Ceriporia lacerata P2. J Environ Sci 23:2055–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xin B, Zhang Y, Liu C, Chen S, Wu B (2012) Comparison of specific adsorption capacity of different forms of fungal pellets for removal of Acid Brilliant Red B from aqueous solution and mechanisms exploration. Process Biochem 47:1197–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Almeida EJR, Corso CR (2014) Comparative study of toxicity of azo dye Procion Red MX-5B following biosorption and biodegradation treatments with the fungi Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus. Chemosphere 112:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taha M, Adetutu EM, Shahsavari E, Smith AT, Ball AS (2014) Azo and anthraquinone dye mixture decolourization at elevated temperature and concentration by a newly isolated thermophilic fungus, Thermomucor indicae-seudaticae. J Environ Chem Eng 2:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mustafa MM, Jamal P, Alkhatib MF, Mahmod SS, Jimat DN, Ilyas NN (2017) Panus tigrinus as a potential biomass source for Reactive Blue decolorization: isotherm and kinetic study. Electron J Biotechnol 26:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karim E, Dhar K, Hossain T (2017) Co-metabolic decolorization of a textile reactive dye by Aspergillus fumigatus. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vantamuri AB, Kaliwa BB (2017) Decolourization and biodegradation of Navy blue HER (Reactive Blue 171) dye from Marasmius sp. BBKAV79. 3. Biotech 7(48):1–7Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bulla LMC, Polonio JC, Brito Portela-Castro AL, Kava V, Azevedo JL, Pamphile JA (2017) Activity of the endophytic fungi Phlebia sp. and Paecilomyces formosus in decolourisation and the reduction of reactive dyes’cytotoxicity in fish erythrocytes. Environ Monit Assess 189(2):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Apar DK, Demirhan E, Ozel B, Ozbek B (2017) Kefir grain biomass production: influence of different culturing conditions and examination of growth kinetic models. J Food Process Eng 40:e12332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leite AMO, Miguel MAL, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS, Silva JT, Paschoalin VMF (2013) Microbiological, technological and therapeutic properties of kefir: a natural probiotic beverage. Braz J Microbiol 44:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Magalhães KT, Pereira MA, Nicolau A, Dragone G, Domingues L, Teixeira JA, De Almeida Silva JB, Schwan RF (2010) Production of fermented cheese whey-based beverage using kefir grains as starter culture: evaluation of morphological and microbial variations. Bioresour Technol 101:8843–8850CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentYıldız Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations