Advertisement

Boundary Value Problems

, 2019:9 | Cite as

Some existence results of positive solutions for p-Laplacian systems

  • Peng Wang
  • Yuanfang RuEmail author
Open Access
Research
  • 216 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we establish several new existence theorems for positive solutions of systems of \((2n,2m)\)-order of two p-Laplacian equations. The results are based on the Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem and mainly complement those of Djebali, Moussaoui, and Precup.

Keywords

p-Laplacian Positive solution Fixed point theorem 

1 Introduction

Quasilinear elliptic systems have been used in a great variety of applications, and existence results and a priori estimates of positive solutions for quasilinear elliptic systems have been broadly investigated. For instance, D’Ambrosio and Mitidieri [1] studied Liouville theorems for a class of possibly singular quasilinear elliptic equations and inequalities in the framework of Carnot groups, and their results are new even in the canonical Euclidean setting. In [2] the authors proved a priori estimates for the solutions of elliptic systems involving quasilinear operators in divergence form in an open set \(\varOmega \subset R^{N}\) and, as a consequence, obtained theorems on nonexistence of positive solutions in the case \(\varOmega =R ^{N}\). More related results can be found in [3, 4, 5]. Equations of the p-Laplacian form occur in the study of non-Newtonian fluid theory and the turbulent flow of a gas in a porous medium. To our best knowledge, there are many papers devoted to the study of differential equations with p-Laplacian. We refer the readers to [6] (one-dimensional p-Laplacian), [7, 8, 9, 10] (fourth-order p-Laplacian), and [11] (2nd-order p-Laplacian). Most of these results are based upon the quadrature method, topological degree, the fixed point theorem on a cone, or the lower and upper solution method. Especially, Djebali et al. [12] have shown some existence results for the fourth-order p-Laplacian nonlinear system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} {[\varphi _{p}({u'')}]}{''} =h_{1}(u,v),\quad t\in (0,1), \\ {[ \varphi _{p}(v'')]}'' =h_{2}(u,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad i=0,1, \\ v^{(2j)}(0)=v^{(2j)}(1)=0, \quad j=0,1. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
The first existence result is obtained via the classical Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem of cone compression and expansion under the following notation and assumptions.
  1. (H1)
    For \(i = 1, 2\), there exist nonnegative constants \(h_{i}^{0}\) and \(h_{i}^{\infty }\) defined as
    $$ h_{i}^{0}=\lim_{u+v\rightarrow 0}\frac{h_{i}(u,v)}{(u+v)^{p-1}} \quad \text{and}\quad h_{i}^{\infty }=\lim_{u+v\rightarrow \infty } \frac{h_{i}(u,v)}{(u+v)^{p-1}}. $$
     
The second existence result is obtained via the vector versions of the Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem [13] under the following notation and assumptions.
  1. (H2)
    For \(\lambda = 0\) or \(\lambda = +\infty \), there exist nonnegative constants \(H_{1}^{\lambda }\) and \(H_{2}^{\lambda }\) defined as
    $$\begin{aligned}& H_{1}^{\lambda }=\lim_{u\rightarrow \lambda } \frac{h_{1}(u,v)}{u^{p-1}} \quad \text{uniformly with respect to } v \text{ on compact subsets of } R^{+}, \\& H_{2}^{\lambda }=\lim_{v\rightarrow \lambda } \frac{h_{2}(u,v)}{v^{p-1}} \quad \text{uniformly with respect to } u \text{ on compact subsets of } R^{+}. \end{aligned}$$
     
A comparison of the obtained results to those from the literature is provided.
In addition, there are some papers concerned with the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of systems of \((2n,2m)\)th-order equations under assumption (H1); see [14, 15, 16, 17]. The proof is based on the classical Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem of cone compression and expansion [14, 15, 17], fixed point index arguments and upper and lower solutions method [16]. However, in [12, 14, 15, 16, 17] the uniqueness of positive solutions is not considered. Therefore, via the classical Krasnosel’skii fixed point theorem of cone compression and expansion, the results we are going to present reveal how the behavior of the functions \(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) at zero and infinity have a profound effect on the existence, uniqueness, and multiplicity of a positive solution of the following system:
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{n} {[\varphi _{p}({u^{(2n_{1})})}]}^{({2n_{2}})} =f_{1}(t,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ (-1)^{m}{[ \varphi _{p}(v^{(2m_{1})})]}^{(2m_{2})} =f_{2}(t,u), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad i=0,1,\ldots,n-1, \\ v^{(2j)}(0)=v^{(2j)}(1)=0, \quad j=0,1,\ldots,m-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(1.1)
where \(n_{1}+n_{2}=n\), \(m_{1}+m_{2}=m\), \(n, m\in {\mathbf{N}}\), \(n,m\geq 2\). Here \(\varphi _{p}(s)=s{|s|}^{p-2}\) (\(p>1\)) refers to the p-Laplacian, and \(f_{i}:[0,1]\times R^{+}\rightarrow R^{+}\) are continuous (\(i=1,2\)) with \(f_{2}(t,0)=0\).
Furthermore, in Sect. 4, we consider the existence of positive solutions of the system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{n} {[\varphi _{p}({u^{(2n_{1})})}]}^{({2n_{2}})} =f(u,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ (-1)^{m}{[ \varphi _{p}(v^{(2m_{1})})]}^{(2m_{2})} =g(u,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad i=0,1,\ldots,n-1, \\ v^{(2j)}(0)=v^{(2j)}(1)=0, \quad j=0,1,\ldots,m-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(1.2)
under the following assumption:
  1. (H3)
    there exist two pairs of nonnegative functions \(F_{1}\), \(F_{2}\) and \(G_{1}\), \(G_{2}\) such that
    $$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} F_{1}(v)\leq f(u,v)\leq F_{2}(v) \quad \text{for all } u\in [0,+\infty ], \\ G_{1}(u)\leq g(u,v)\leq G_{2}(u) \quad \text{for all }v\in [0,+\infty ], \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
     
or
(\(\widetilde{\text{H}}\)3)
there exist two pairs of nonnegative functions \(F_{1}\), \(F_{2}\) and \(G_{1}\), \(G_{2}\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} F_{1}(u)\leq f(u,v)\leq F_{2}(u), \quad \text{for all }v\in [0,+\infty ], \\ G_{1}(v)\leq g(u,v)\leq G_{2}(v), \quad \text{for all }u\in [0,+\infty ]. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
At the end of Sect. 4, we also give examples where \(f(u,v)\) and \(g(u,v)\) satisfying assumption (H3) do not satisfy assumptions (H1) and (H2).

2 Preliminaries

Let \(G_{n}(t,s)\) be the Green function of the linear boundary value problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{(n)}\omega ^{(2n)}(t)=0, \quad t\in [0,1], \\ \omega ^{(2i)}(0)=\omega ^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad 0\leq i\leq n-1. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
By induction the Green function \(G_{n}(t,s)\) can be expressed as (see[15])
$$ G_{i}(t,s)= \int _{0}^{1}G(t,\xi)G_{i-1}(\xi,s)\,d\xi, \quad 2\leq i\leq n, $$
where
$$ G_{1}(t,s)=G(t,s)= \textstyle\begin{cases} t(1-s), & 0\leq t\leq s\leq 1, \\ s(1-t), & 0\leq s\leq t\leq 1. \end{cases} $$

Lemma 2.1

([15])

The function\(G_{n} (t,s)\)has the following properties:
  1. (1)

    \(G_{n}(t,s)>0\), \((t,s)\in (0,1)\times (0,1)\).

     
  2. (2)

    For any\((t,s)\in [0,1]\times [0,1]\), \(G_{n}(t,s)\leq \frac{1}{6^{n-1}}s(1-s)\).

     
  3. (3)
    If\(\delta \in (0,\frac{1}{2})\), then for any\((t,s)\in [\delta,1- \delta ]\times [0,1]\),
    $$\begin{aligned} G_{n}(t,s) \geq &\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}s(1-s) \\ \geq & 6^{n-1}\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}\max_{0\leq t\leq 1}G_{n}(t,s). \end{aligned}$$
     

Lemma 2.2

For any\(m,n\in \mathbf{N^{+}}\)and\(h\in C[0,1]\)with\(h(t)\geq 0\), the solution of the boundary value problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{n} {[\varphi _{p}({u^{(2n)})}]}^{({2m})}=h(t), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad 0\leq i\leq n-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
can be expressed by\(u(t)=\int _{0}^{1} G_{n}(t,s)\varphi _{q}(\int _{0} ^{1} G_{m}(s,\tau)h(\tau)\,d\tau)\,ds\), where\(\varphi _{q}\)stands for the inverse function\(\varphi _{q}=\varphi ^{-1}_{p}\)with conjugatesp, q, that is, \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\). Moreover, the solution satisfies the estimate
$$ \min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}u(t)\geq 6^{n-1}\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4 \delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}\Vert u\Vert , $$
where\(\|u\|=\max_{t\in [0,1]}|u(t)|\), the norm of\(C[0,1]\).

Proof

For \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) =& \int _{0}^{1} G_{n}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1} G_{m}(s,\tau)h( \tau)\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &\max_{t\in [0,1]} \int _{0}^{1} 6^{n-1}\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4 \delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}G_{n}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl({ \int _{0}^{1}} G_{m}(s,\tau)h(\tau)\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &6^{n-1}\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}\max_{t\in [0,1]} \int _{0}^{1} G_{n}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( { \int _{0}^{1}} G_{m}(s,\tau)h(\tau)\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ =&6^{n-1}\delta ^{n} \biggl(\frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1} \Vert u\Vert . \end{aligned}$$
 □

Definition 2.3

Let K be a cone in a real Banach space X. With some positive \(u_{0}\in K\backslash \{0\}\), \(A:K \rightarrow K\) is called \(u_{0}\)-sublinear if
  1. (a)

    for any \(x>0\), there exist \(\theta _{1}>0\) and \(\theta _{2}>0\) such that \(\theta _{1}u_{0}\leq Ax \leq \theta _{2}u_{0}\);

     
  2. (b)

    for any \(\theta _{1}u_{0}\leq x \leq \theta _{2}u_{0}\) and \(t\in (0,1)\), there exists \(\eta =\eta (x,t)>0\) such that \(A(tx) \geq (1+\eta)tAx\).

     

Lemma 2.4

([14], Theorem 2.2.2)

An increasing and\(u_{0}\)-sublinear operatorAhas at most one positive fixed point.

Lemma 2.5

([18])

LetEbe a Banach space, and let\(K\subset E\)be a cone inE. Let\(\varOmega _{1}\)and\(\varOmega _{2}\)be open subsets ofEwith\(0\in \varOmega _{1}\)and\(\overline{\varOmega }_{1} \subset \varOmega _{2}\), and let\(A:K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{2}\setminus \varOmega _{1})\rightarrow K\)be a completely continuous operator such that either
  1. (i)

    \(\|Au\|\leq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{1}\), and\(\|Au\|\geq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{2}\); or

     
  2. (ii)

    \(\|Au\|\geq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{1}\), and\(\|Au\|\leq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{2}\).

     
ThenAhas a fixed point in\(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{2}\setminus \varOmega _{1})\).
At the end of this section, for any \(\alpha _{i}\), \(\tilde{\alpha } _{i}\), \(\beta _{i}\), \(\tilde{\beta }_{i}\in R^{+}\) (\(i=1,2\)), we give some notations:
$$\begin{aligned}& \underline{\varphi}_{i}^{0}=\liminf_{c\rightarrow 0^{+}} \min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}\frac{f_{i}(t,c)}{c^{\alpha _{i}}},\qquad \overline{ \varphi }_{i}^{0}=\limsup_{c\rightarrow 0^{+}}\max _{t\in [0,1]}\frac{f _{i}(t,c)}{c^{\alpha _{i}}}, \\& \underline{\psi }_{i}^{\infty }=\liminf_{c\rightarrow \infty } \min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}\frac{f_{i}(t,c)}{c^{\beta _{i}}}, \qquad \overline{ \psi }_{i}^{\infty }=\limsup_{c\rightarrow \infty }\max _{t\in [0,1]}\frac{f _{i}(t,c)}{c^{\beta _{i}}}, \\& \underline{F}_{1}^{0}=\liminf_{c\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{F_{1}(c)}{c ^{\alpha _{1}}},\qquad \overline{F}_{2}^{\infty }= \limsup _{c\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{F_{2}(c)}{c^{\beta _{1}}}, \\& \underline{G}_{1}^{0}=\liminf_{d\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{G_{1}(d)}{d ^{\alpha _{2}}},\qquad \overline{G}_{2}^{\infty }= \limsup _{d\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{G_{2}(d)}{d^{\beta _{2}}}, \\& \underline{F}_{1}^{\infty }=\liminf_{c\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{F _{1}(c)}{c^{\widetilde{\alpha }_{1}}},\qquad \overline{F}_{2}^{0}= \limsup _{c\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{F_{2}(c)}{c^{\tilde{\beta }_{1}}}, \\& \underline{G}_{1}^{\infty }=\liminf_{d\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{G _{1}(d)}{d^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}}},\qquad \overline{G}_{2}^{0}= \limsup _{d\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{G_{2}(d)}{d^{\tilde{\beta }_{2}}}. \end{aligned}$$
For any \(\alpha,\beta,\sigma \in R^{+}\) and \(m,n,l\in \mathbf{N^{+}}\), let
$$\begin{aligned}& \varGamma = \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }t(1-t)\,dt,\qquad \theta _{n}(\delta)=\delta ^{n} \biggl( \frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n-1}, \\& \sigma (n)=6^{n-1}\theta _{n}(\delta),\qquad L(m,n)= \frac{1}{6^{m}}\frac{1}{6^{n(q-1)}}, \\& S(m,n,l,\alpha)=\theta _{m}(\delta)\theta _{n}^{q-1}( \delta)\sigma (l)^{ \alpha (q-1)}\varGamma ^{q}. \end{aligned}$$

3 Main results of Problem (1.1)

Define the mapping \(A: C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1]\) by
$$ A(u) (t)=A_{1}\circ A_{2}(u) (t), $$
where
$$\begin{aligned}& A_{1}(v) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds, \\& A_{2}(u) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Let \(P=\{u\in C[0,1], u\geq 0\}\). The pair \((u,v)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a positive solution of (1.1) if and only if \((u,v)\) belongs to \(P\setminus \{0\}\times P\setminus \{0\}\) and satisfies \(u=A_{1}v\), \(v=A_{2}u\). If \(u\in P\setminus \{0\}\) is a fixed point of A, then define \(v=A_{2}u\). Then \(v\in P\setminus \{0\}\), so that \((u,v)\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) solves (1.1). So our main goal is to look for nonzero fixed points of A in the subcone
$$ K=\Bigl\{ u(t)\in P:\min_{\delta \leq t\leq 1-\delta }u(t)\geq \sigma (n _{1}) \Vert u\Vert \Bigr\} . $$
Since \(u(t)\in K\) with \(u(t)\geq 0\), this means that the corresponding solutions of (1.1) are nonnegative.
For any given \(r>0\), let
$$\begin{aligned}& \varOmega _{r}=\bigl\{ u\in C[0,1]:\Vert u\Vert < r\bigr\} , \\& \partial \varOmega _{r}=\bigl\{ u\in C[0,1]:\Vert u\Vert =r\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 3.1

For any\(0< r< R\), the operator\(A:K\cap (\overline{ \varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\rightarrow K\)is completely continuous.

Proof

For any \(u(t)\in K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R} \setminus \varOmega _{r})\), by Lemma 2.2 we get
$$\begin{aligned} \min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}A(u) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &6^{n_{1}-1}\delta ^{n_{1}} \biggl( \frac{4\delta ^{3}-6\delta ^{2}+1}{6} \biggr)^{n_{1}-1} \\ &{}\times \max_{t\in [0,1]} \int _{0}^{1} G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl({ \int _{0}^{1}} G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&\sigma (n_{1})\bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert , \end{aligned}$$
which implies that \(A:K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\rightarrow K\).

Now, we verify that A is completely continuous.

First, for the continuity of A, we only need to prove that \(\|A(u_{n})-A(u)\|\rightarrow 0\) if \(u_{n}\rightarrow u\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). Let us consider
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert A(u_{n}) (t)-A(u) (t)\bigr\vert =&\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u_{n}) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ &{}- \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr\vert \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\biggl\vert \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u_{n}) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr) \\ &{}-\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) ( \tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr) \biggr\vert \,ds. \end{aligned}$$
From the continuity of \(f_{1}\) and \(f_{2}\) it follows that \(\|A(u_{n})-A(u) \|\rightarrow 0\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \).
Second, we show that the operator A is uniformly bounded. For any \(u(t)\in K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\), by Lemma 2.1(2) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert A(u) (t)\bigr\vert =&\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr\vert \\ \leq &\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1} \frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl({ \int _{0}^{1}} \frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) ( \tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$
Since \(f_{1}\) and \(f_{2}\) are continuous, it is clear that \(A(u)(t)\) is uniformly bounded on \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\).
Finally, we show the equicontinuity of the operator A. From the expression of \(G(t,s)\) we easily obtain that
$$ \frac{\partial G(t,\tau)}{\partial t}= \textstyle\begin{cases} 1-s, & 0\leq t\leq s\leq 1, \\ -s, & 0\leq s\leq t\leq 1, \end{cases} $$
which implies that \(|\frac{\partial G(t,\tau)}{\partial t}|\) is bounded. There exists a constant \(M>0\) such that \(|\frac{\partial G(t, \tau)}{\partial t}|< M\). For any \(u(t)\in K\cap (\overline{\varOmega } _{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\), \(t_{1},t_{2}\in [0,1]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \bigl\vert A(u) (t_{2})-A(u) (t_{1})\bigr\vert \\& \quad =\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{2},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\& \qquad {}- \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{1},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr\vert \\& \quad =\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{2},\xi) \biggl[ \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}-1}(\xi,s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr]\,d\xi \\& \qquad {}- \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{1},\xi) \biggl[ \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}-1}(\xi,s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr]\,d\xi \biggr\vert \\& \quad =\biggl\vert \int _{0}^{1}\frac{\partial G(t,\tau)}{\partial t}(t_{2}-t_{1}) \biggl[ \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}-1}(\xi,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr]\,d\xi ]\biggr\vert \\& \quad \leq K \int _{0}^{1}\biggl[ \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}-1}(\xi,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \biggr]\,d\xi ]\vert t_{2}-t_{1}\vert , \end{aligned}$$
which implies that A is equicontinuous. By the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem we get that \(A:K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\rightarrow K\) is compact. Consequently, it follows that \(A:K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\rightarrow K\) is completely continuous. □

Theorem 3.2

Assume that\(\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2\)) with
$$ \alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2},\qquad \beta _{1}\beta _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2}. $$
In addition, let the functions\(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumptions:
$$ \overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}< +\infty,\qquad \overline{ \varphi }_{2}^{0}=0,\qquad \underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }>0,\qquad \underline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=+ \infty. $$
Then (1.1) has at least one positive solution.

Proof

On one hand, from the assumption \(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}<+\infty \) we have that there exist \(\varepsilon >0\) and \(\widehat{r}\in (0,1)\) such that
$$ f_{1}(t,v)\leq \bigl(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+ \varepsilon\bigr)v^{\alpha _{1}}\quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], v\in [0, \widehat{r}]. $$
Furthermore, from the assumption \(\overline{\varphi }_{2}^{0}=0\) we have that there exist \(\varepsilon _{1}>0\) and \(\overline{r}\in (0,\widehat{r})\) such that
$$ f_{2}(t,u)\leq \varepsilon _{1}u^{\alpha _{2}} \quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], u \in [0,\overline{r}], $$
where \(\varepsilon _{1}\) satisfies
$$\begin{aligned}& \varepsilon _{1}^{q-1}L(m_{1},m_{2})\leq \widehat{r}, \\& \varepsilon _{1}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)^{2}}L^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2})L(n _{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+ \varepsilon\bigr)^{q-1}\leq \widehat{r}. \end{aligned}$$
Set \(r=\bar{r}\). Then for any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) =&A_{2}(u) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}}}\varphi _{q}\biggl(\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}}}\biggr) \varphi _{q}\bigl( \varepsilon _{1}\Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}}\bigr) \\ =&\varepsilon _{1}^{q-1}L(m_{1},m_{2}) \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}\leq 1. \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}(\tau,v)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau) \bigl( \overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+ \varepsilon\bigr)v^{\alpha _{1}}( \tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\bigl(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+\varepsilon \bigr)^{q-1}\frac{1}{6^{n _{1}}}\varphi _{q}\biggl( \frac{1}{6^{n_{2}}}\biggr)\varphi _{q}\bigl(\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}}\bigr) \\ \leq &\bigl(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+\varepsilon \bigr)^{q-1}L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl\Vert \varepsilon _{1}^{q-1}L(m_{1},m_{2})\Vert u \Vert ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}\bigr\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)} \\ =&\varepsilon _{1}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)^{2}}L^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2})L(n _{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}+ \varepsilon\bigr)^{q-1} \Vert u\Vert ^{ \alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}} \\ \leq & \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}}\leq \Vert u\Vert , \end{aligned}$$
that is, \(\|A(u)(t)\|\leq \|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r}\).
On the other hand, from the assumptions \(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{ \infty }>0\) and \(\underline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=+\infty \) it follows that there exist \(C_{1}>0\) and \(\overline{R}>1\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}& f_{1}(t,v)\geq \bigl(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }- \varepsilon\bigr) v^{\beta _{1}} \quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], v\geq \overline{R}, \\& f_{2}(t,u)\geq C_{1} u^{\beta _{2}} \quad \text{for } t \in [0,1], u\geq \overline{R}, \end{aligned}$$
where \(C_{1}\) satisfies
$$\begin{aligned}& C_{1}^{q-1}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \beta _{2})\geq 1, \\& C_{1}^{\beta _{1}(q-1)^{2}}\bigl(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }- \varepsilon\bigr)^{q-1}S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \beta _{1})S^{\beta _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2},n _{1},\beta _{2})\geq 1. \end{aligned}$$
Set \(R=\max \{\frac{\overline{R}}{\sigma },\overline{R}^{\frac{1}{ \beta _{1}(q-1)}}\}\). Then for any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\), we have \(u(t)\geq \sigma R\geq \sigma \frac{\overline{R}}{\sigma }= \overline{R}\) for \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), and
$$\begin{aligned} v(t)=A_{2}(u) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)C _{1}\sigma ^{\beta _{2}}(n_{1})\Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{2}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &C_{1}^{q-1}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \beta _{2})\Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{2}(q-1)} \\ \geq & \Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{2}(q-1)}=R^{\beta _{2}(q-1)}\geq \overline{R}. \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, for \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we also get
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}(\tau,v)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau) \bigl(\underline{ \psi }_{1}^{\infty }-\varepsilon\bigr) \sigma ^{\beta _{1}}(m_{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{ \beta _{1}}\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &\bigl(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }-\varepsilon\bigr) ^{q-1}S(n_{1},n _{2},m_{1},\beta _{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{\beta _{1}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Then from the above inequalities, for \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t) \geq & C_{1}^{q-1}S(n_{1},n_{2},n_{1}, \beta _{1})\varGamma ^{q}\bigl\Vert C _{2}^{q-1}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \beta _{2})\varGamma ^{q}\Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{2}(q-1)} \bigr\Vert ^{\beta _{1}(q-1)} \\ =&C_{1}^{\beta _{1}(q-1)^{2}}\bigl(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }- \varepsilon\bigr) ^{q-1}S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \beta _{1})S^{\beta _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2},n _{1},\beta _{2}) \Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{1}\beta _{2}(q-1)^{2}} \\ \geq & \Vert u\Vert ^{\beta _{1}\beta _{2}(q-1)^{2}}\geq \Vert u\Vert , \end{aligned}$$
which yields that \(\|A(u)(t)\|\geq \|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\).

Therefore, by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\). □

Theorem 3.3

Assume that\(\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2\)) with
$$ \alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2},\qquad \beta _{1}\beta _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2}. $$
In addition, let the functions\(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumptions:
$$ \underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}>0,\qquad \underline{\varphi}_{2}^{0}=+ \infty, \qquad \overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }< +\infty,\qquad \overline{ \psi }_{2}^{\infty }=0. $$
Then (1.1) has at least one positive solution.

Proof

On one hand, from the assumptions \(\underline{ \varphi }_{1}^{0}>0\) and \(\underline{\varphi}_{2}^{0}=+\infty \) we have that there exist \(C_{3}>0\) and \(0<\overline{r}<1\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}& f_{1}(t,v)\geq \bigl(\underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}- \varepsilon \bigr) v^{\alpha _{1}} \quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], 0\leq v\leq \overline{r}, \\& f_{2}(t,u)\geq C_{3} u^{\alpha _{2}}\quad \text{for } t \in [0,1], 0\leq u \leq \overline{r}, \end{aligned}$$
where \(C_{3}\) satisfies
$$ C_{3}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)^{2}}\bigl(\underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}- \varepsilon \bigr)^{q-1}S(n _{1},n_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{1})S^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{2}) \geq 1. $$
Since \(f_{2}\) is continuous and \(f_{2}(t,0)=0\), there exists \(\widehat{r}\in (0,\overline{r})\) such that
$$ f_{2}(t,u)\leq \overline{r}^{p-1} \quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], u\in [0, \widehat{r}]. $$
Set \(r=\widehat{r}\). For any \(u(t)\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} v(t)=A_{2}(u) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &L(m_{1},m_{2})\varphi _{q}\bigl( \overline{r}^{p-1}\bigr)\leq \overline{r}. \end{aligned}$$
Then, for \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}(\tau,v)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau) \bigl(\underline{ \varphi }_{1}^{0}-\varepsilon \bigr) \sigma ^{\alpha _{1}}(m_{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}}\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \bigl(\underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}-\varepsilon \bigr)^{q-1}S(n_{1},n_{2},m _{1},\alpha _{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} v(t)=A_{2}(u) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)C _{3}\sigma ^{\alpha _{2}}(n_{1})\Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &C_{3}^{q-1}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{2})\Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
From these inequalities we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \geq A(u) (t)\vert _{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]} \geq & \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}}\geq \Vert u\Vert \quad \text{for } u(t)\in K \cap \partial \varOmega _{r}. \end{aligned}$$
On the other hand, by the assumptions \(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }<+ \infty \) and \(\overline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=0\) there exist \(\varepsilon _{2}>0\) and \(\overline{R}>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned}& f_{1}(t,v)\leq \bigl(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }+ \varepsilon\bigr)v^{\beta _{1}} \quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], v\geq \overline{R}, \\& f_{2}(t,u)\leq \varepsilon _{2}u^{\beta _{2}}\quad \text{for } t\in [0,1], u \geq \overline{R}, \end{aligned}$$
where \(\varepsilon _{2}\) satisfies \(\varepsilon _{2}^{\beta _{1}(q-1)^{2}}(\overline{ \psi }_{1}^{\infty }+\varepsilon)^{q-1}L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\beta _{1}(q-1)}(m _{1},m_{2})<1\). Since \(f_{i}\) is continuous, let
$$\begin{aligned}& N_{1}=\max \bigl\{ f_{1}(t,v):0\leq t\leq 1, 0\leq v\leq \overline{R}\bigr\} , \\& N_{2}=\max \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1,0\leq u\leq \overline{R}\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
Then we have the estimates
$$ f_{1}(t,v)\leq \bigl(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }+ \varepsilon\bigr)v^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1},\qquad f_{2}(t, u) \leq \varepsilon _{2}u^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2}. $$
Via some computations we obtain the inequalities
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t) =&A_{1}\circ A_{2} (u) (t) \\ =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \bigl(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }+\varepsilon\bigr) \bigl(A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1}\bigr]\,d\tau \biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\bigl(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }+\varepsilon\bigr) \bigl(A_{2}(u) ( \tau)\bigr)^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1}\bigr) \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2} (u) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \varepsilon _{2}u(\tau))^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2}\bigr]\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(m_{1},m_{2})\varphi _{q}\bigl(\varepsilon _{2}u^{\beta _{2}}(\tau)+N_{2}\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
It is clear that the term with the highest index is
$$ \varepsilon _{2}^{\beta _{1}(q-1)^{2}}\bigl(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }+ \varepsilon\bigr)^{q-1}L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\beta _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2})u^{ \beta _{1}\beta _{2}(q-1)^{2}}< u^{\beta _{1}\beta _{2}(q-1)^{2}}. $$
Thus there exists a sufficiently large \(R>0\) such that
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \leq \Vert u\Vert , \quad u(t)\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}. \end{aligned}$$

Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\). □

Theorem 3.4

Assume that the functions\(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumptions:
  1. (i)

    \(f_{i}(t,c)\)is nondecreasing oncuniformly for\(t\in [0,1]\);

     
  2. (ii)
    there exist four positive constants\(k_{1}< k_{2}\), \(l_{1}< l_{2}\)such that
    $$\begin{aligned}& k_{1}v^{\alpha _{1}}\leq f_{1}(t,v)\leq k_{2} v^{\alpha _{1}} \quad \textit{uniformly in } t\in [0,1], v\in [0,+\infty); \\& l_{1}u^{\alpha _{2}}\leq f_{2}(t,u)\leq l_{2} u^{\alpha _{2}}\quad \textit{uniformly in } t\in [0,1], u\in [0,+\infty). \end{aligned}$$
     
  3. (iii)
    there exist two positive constants\(\alpha _{1}\), \(\alpha _{2}\)with\(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}<(p-1)^{2}\)such that
    $$ f_{i}(t,\xi c)\geq \xi ^{\alpha _{i}} f_{i}(t,c) \quad \textit{for all } \xi \in (0,1). $$
     
Then (1.1) has a unique positive solution.

Proof

First, we give the existence result. On one hand, for \(u\in K\) and \(t_{0}\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)k ^{\alpha _{1}}\sigma ^{\alpha _{1}}(m_{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1},\alpha _{1})k_{1}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
In the similar way, we also have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert v(t)\bigr\Vert \geq& A_{2}(u) (t_{0}) = \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau)\biggr)f\bigl( \tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq &S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1},\alpha _{2})l^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}_{1}\Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Combining these inequalities, for \(u\in K\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \geq S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \alpha _{1})S^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}(m _{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{2}) k_{1}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}l^{\alpha _{1} \alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}}_{1} \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
Since \(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}<(p-1)^{2}\), there exists a sufficiently small \(r>0\) such that \(\|A(u)(t)\|>\|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r}\).
On the other hand, for \(u\in K\),
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)v^{\alpha _{1}}(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}(q-1)}}k_{2}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)} \Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
In a similar way, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert v(t)\bigr\Vert =&\bigl\Vert A_{2}(u) (t)\bigr\Vert =\max_{t\in [0,1]} \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}(q-1)}}l_{2}^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)} \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Combining these inequalities, for \(u\in K\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \leq L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2})k_{2} ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}l_{2}^{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}} \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}(q-1)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
Since \(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}<(p-1)^{2}\), there exists a sufficiently large \(R>0\) such that \(\|A(u)(t)\|<\|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\).
Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\). Finally, we prove that A has at most one fixed point in \(P\setminus \{ 0 \} \). It is easy to see that \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\) are increasing operators with respect to the partial order induced by K. So is \(A=A_{1}A_{2}\). By Lemma 2.4 we only need to verify that A is \(u_{0}\)-sublinear for some positive \(u_{0}\in C[0,1]\). Take \(u_{0}=t(1-t)\). Set \(M=\max_{t\in [0,1]}F(t)\), where
$$\begin{aligned} F(t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}-1}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau) \\ &{}f_{1}\biggl(\tau, \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(\tau,\nu)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}G_{m_{2}}(\nu, \mu)f_{2}\bigl(,\mu, u(\mu)\bigr)\,d\mu\biggr)\,d\nu\biggr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Then we have
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)F(s)\,ds\leq M \int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)\,ds = \frac{M}{2} t(1-t). \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we have
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G(t,s)F(s)\,ds\geq \int _{0}^{1} C G(t,t)G(s,s)F(s)\,ds= \int _{0}^{1} C G(s,s)F(s)\,ds G(t,t). \end{aligned}$$
So we can choose \(\theta _{1}=\int _{0}^{1} C G(s,s)F(s)\,ds\) and \(\theta _{2}=\frac{M}{2}\).

From the above discussion we know that \(A=A_{1}A_{2}\) satisfies (a) of Definition 2.3. The proof is complete if A satisfies (b) of Definition 2.3. To this end, let \(\theta _{1}u_{0}\leq u\leq \theta _{2}u_{0}\), \(\xi \in (0,1)\). Then a direct calculation gives \(A_{2}(\xi u)= \xi ^{\frac{\alpha _{2}}{p-1}}A_{2}(u)\), \(A_{1}(\xi v)= \xi ^{\frac{\alpha _{1}}{p-1}}A_{1}(v)\). Since \(\xi \in (0,1)\) and \(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}<(p-1)^{2}\), we get \(A(\xi u)=A_{1}( \xi ^{\frac{\alpha _{2}}{p-1}}A_{2}(u))= \xi ^{\frac{\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}}{(p-1)^{2}}}A(u)\geq (1+\eta)\xi A(x)\) for some \(\eta >0\). □

Theorem 3.5

Assume that\(\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2\)) with
$$ \alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2},\qquad \beta _{1}\beta _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2}. $$
In addition, let the functions\(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumptions::
  1. (i)

    \(\underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}>0\), \(\underline{\varphi}_{2}^{0}=+ \infty \), \(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }>0\), \(\underline{\psi }_{2} ^{\infty }=+\infty\);

     
  2. (ii)
    there existssuch that\(\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}}} \varphi _{q}(\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}}})\varphi _{q}(N^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}) \leq \widetilde{R}\), where
    $$\begin{aligned}& N^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}=\max \bigl\{ f_{1}(t,v):0\leq t\leq 1,0\leq v\leq L(m _{1},m_{2})\varphi _{q} \bigl(N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr)\bigr\} , \\& N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}=\max \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1,\sigma (n_{1}) \widetilde{R}\leq u\leq \widetilde{R}\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
     
Then (1.1) has at least two positive solutions.

Proof

For any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{\widetilde{R}}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) =&A_{2} (u) (t) = \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ =&L(m_{1},m_{2})\varphi _{q} \bigl(N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we get
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t) =&A_{1}\circ A_{2} (u) (t) \\ =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)N^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(n_{1},n_{2})\varphi _{q} \bigl(N^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr)\leq \widetilde{R}, \end{aligned}$$
that is, \(\|A(u)(t)\|\leq \|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{\widetilde{R}}\).

Since \(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2}\), \(\beta _{1}\beta _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2}\), \(\underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}>0\), \(\underline{\varphi}_{2}^{0}=+\infty \), \(\underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }>0\), and \(\underline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=+\infty \), from the proofs of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3 it follows that there exist \(r>0\) (sufficiently small) and \(R>0\) (sufficiently large) such that \(\|A(u)(t)\|\geq \|u \|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r} \), and \(\|A(u)(t)\|\geq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\). Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least two fixed points in \(K\cap (\overline{ \varOmega }_{\widetilde{R}}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\) and \(K\cap (\overline{ \varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{\widetilde{R}})\). □

Theorem 3.6

Assume that\(\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2\)) with
$$ \alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2},\qquad \beta _{1}\beta _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2}. $$
In addition, let the functions\(f_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumptions:
  1. (i)

    \(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}<+\infty \), \(\overline{\varphi } _{2}^{0}=0\), \(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }<\infty \), \(\overline{ \psi }_{2}^{\infty }=0\);

     
  2. (ii)
    there existssuch that\(S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1},0) \varphi _{q}(K^{1}_{\widehat{R}})\geq \widehat{R}\), where
    $$\begin{aligned}& K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}=\min \bigl\{ f_{1}(t,v):\delta \leq t \leq 1-\delta, \\& \hphantom{K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}=}{}S(m _{1},m_{2},n_{1},0)\varphi _{q}\bigl(K^{2}_{\widehat{R}}\bigr)\leq v\leq L(m_{1},m _{2})\varphi _{q}\bigl(N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}} \bigr)\bigr\} , \\& N^{2}_{\widehat{R}}=\max \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1,\sigma (n_{1}) \widetilde{R}\leq u\leq \widetilde{R}\bigr\} , \\& K^{2}_{\widehat{R}}=\min \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):\delta \leq t \leq 1-\delta, \sigma (n_{1}) \widetilde{R}\leq u\leq \widetilde{R} \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
     
Then (1.1) has at least two positive solutions.

Proof

For any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{\widehat{R}}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) =&A_{2} (u) (t) = \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)f_{2}\bigl(\tau,u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ =&L(m_{1},m_{2})\varphi _{q} \bigl(N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
For \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\),
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) =&A_{2}(u) (t) = \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)f _{2}(\tau,u)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1},0)\varGamma ^{q}\varphi _{q}\bigl(K^{2}_{\widehat{R}} \bigr). \end{aligned}$$
Thus, for \(t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]\), we have the estimates
$$ S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1},0)\varphi _{q} \bigl(K^{2}_{\widehat{R}}\bigr)\leq v(t)\leq L(m _{1},m_{2}) \varphi _{q}\bigl(N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr) $$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A(u) (t) =&A_{1}\circ A_{2} (u) (t) \\ =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)f_{1}\bigl(\tau,A_{2}(u) (\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)f _{1}(\tau,v)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq &S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1},0)\varphi _{q}\bigl(K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}\bigr), \end{aligned}$$
that is, \(\|A(u)(t)\|\geq \|u\|\) for \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{\widetilde{R}}\).

Since \(\alpha _{1}\alpha _{2}\geq (p-1)^{2}\), \(\beta _{1}\beta _{2}\leq (p-1)^{2}\), \(\overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}<+ \infty \), \(\overline{\varphi }_{2}^{0}=0\), \(\overline{\psi }_{1}^{ \infty }<\infty \), and \(\overline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=0\), from the proof of Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3 it follows that there exist \(r>0\) (sufficiently small) and \(R>0\) (sufficiently large) such that \(\|A(u)(t) \|\leq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r} \), and \(\|A(u)(t)\| \leq \|u\|\), \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\). Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least two fixed points in \(K\cap (\overline{ \varOmega }_{\widehat{R}}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\) and \(K\cap (\overline{ \varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{\widehat{R}})\). □

Example 1

Assume that \(\alpha,\beta >0\). Then for the problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{n} {[\varphi _{p}({u^{(2n_{1})})}]}^{({2n_{2}})} =v^{\alpha }(t), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ (-1)^{m}{[ \varphi _{p}(v^{(2m_{1})})]}^{(2m_{2})} =u^{\beta }(t), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad i=0,1,\ldots,n-1, \\ v^{(2j)}(0)=v^{(2j)}(1)=0, \quad j=0,1,\ldots,m-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.1)
we have the following existence, uniqueness, and nonexistence results:
  1. (I)

    If \(\alpha \beta \neq (p-1)^{2}\), then (3.1) has at least a positive solution.

     
  2. (II)

    If \(\alpha \beta <(p-1)^{2}\), then (3.1) has a unique positive solution.

     
  3. (III)

    If \(\alpha \beta =(p-1)^{2}\), then (3.1) has no positive solutions.

     

Proof

First, we give the proof of existence results.

(I), (II) On one hand, for \(u\in K\) and \(t_{0}\in [\delta,1- \delta ]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s, \tau)v^{\alpha }(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau) \sigma ^{\alpha }(m_{1})\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha }\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1},\alpha)\Vert v \Vert ^{\alpha (q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
In a similar way, we also have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert v(t)\bigr\Vert \geq& A_{2}(u) (t_{0}) = \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)u^{\beta }(\tau)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq &S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1},\beta)\Vert u \Vert ^{\beta (q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Combining these inequalities, for \(u\in K\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \geq S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \alpha)S^{\alpha (q-1)}(m_{1},m _{2},n_{1},\beta) \Vert u\Vert ^{\alpha \beta (q-1)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)
On the other hand, for \(u\in K\),
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s, \tau)v^{\alpha }(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1- \tau)v^{\alpha }(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}(q-1)}}\Vert v\Vert ^{\alpha (q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
In a similar way, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert v(t)\bigr\Vert =&\bigl\Vert A_{2}(u) (t)\bigr\Vert =\max_{t\in [0,1]} \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s, \tau)u^{\beta }(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq &\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}(q-1)}}\Vert u\Vert ^{\beta (q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Combining these inequalities, for \(u\in K\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \leq L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\alpha (q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2}) \Vert u\Vert ^{ \alpha \beta (q-1)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.3)

We take into account the following two cases.

Case 1: If \(\alpha \beta <(p-1)^{2}\), then from Theorem 3.4 it follows that (3.1) has only a positive solution.

Case 2: If \(\alpha \beta >(p-1)^{2}\), then from (3.2) it follows that there exists \(R>1\) such that, for any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{R}\),
$$ \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \geq S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \alpha)S^{\alpha (q-1)}(m_{1},m _{2},n_{1},\beta) \Vert u\Vert ^{\frac{\alpha \beta }{(p-1)^{2}}}>\Vert u\Vert . $$
By (3.3) there exists \(0< r<1\) such that, for any \(u\in K\cap \partial \varOmega _{r}\)
$$ \bigl\Vert A(u) (t)\bigr\Vert \leq L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\alpha (q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2}) \Vert u\Vert ^{\frac{ \alpha \beta }{(p-1)^{2}}}< \Vert u\Vert . $$
Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\).
(III) We only need to show that A has no positive fixed point in K. On the contrary, if A has a positive fixed point \(u^{*}\in K\), then we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert u^{*}\bigr\Vert =&\bigl\Vert A\bigl(u^{*} \bigr) (t)\bigr\Vert \\ \leq& \frac{1}{6^{n_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}(q-1)}}\biggl[ \frac{1}{6^{m_{1}}}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}(q-1)}}\bigl\Vert u^{*}\bigr\Vert ^{\beta (q-1)}\biggr]^{ \alpha (q-1)} \\ =&L(n_{1},n_{2})L^{\alpha (q-1)}(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigl\Vert u^{*}\bigr\Vert ^{\frac{ \alpha \beta }{(p-1)^{2}}} \\ < & \bigl\Vert u^{*}\bigr\Vert ^{\frac{\alpha \beta }{(p-1)^{2}}}=\bigl\Vert u^{*}\bigr\Vert , \end{aligned}$$
which yields a contradiction. □

Example 2

If \(p=3\) and \(n_{1}=n_{2}=m_{1}=m_{2}=1\), then (1.1) is related to the fourth-order system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} {[\varphi _{3}({u''(t))}]}{''} =f_{1}(t,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ {[ \varphi _{3}(v''(t))]}'' =f_{2}(t,u), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u(0)=u(1)=u''(0)=u''(1)=0, \\ v(0)=v(1)=v''(0)=v''(1)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.4)
where \(f_{1}(t,v)=tv^{2}\) and \(f_{2}(t,u)=tu+tu^{3}\). Choosing \(\alpha _{1}=2\), \(\alpha _{2}=\frac{3}{2}\), \(\beta _{1}=2\), \(\beta _{2}= \frac{5}{2}\), and \(\delta =\frac{1}{4}\), it is easy to verify that
$$\begin{aligned}& \underline{\varphi}_{1}^{0}=\liminf_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \min_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]} \frac{f_{1}(t,v)}{v^{\alpha _{1}}}=\liminf_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{ \frac{1}{4}v^{2}}{v^{2}}=1, \\& \underline{\varphi}_{2}^{0}=\liminf_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \min_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]} \frac{f_{2}(t,u)}{u^{\alpha _{2}}}=\liminf_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{ \frac{1}{4}(u+u^{3})}{u^{\frac{3}{2}}}=+\infty, \\& \underline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }=\liminf_{v\rightarrow \infty } \min_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]}\frac{f_{1}(t,v)}{v^{\beta _{1}}}= \liminf_{v\rightarrow \infty } \frac{\frac{1}{4}v^{2}}{v^{2}}=1, \\& \underline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=\liminf_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \min_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]}\frac{f_{2}(t,u)}{u^{\beta _{2}}}= \liminf_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{\frac{1}{4}(u+u^{3})}{u^{ \frac{5}{2}}}=+\infty, \end{aligned}$$
which implies that (i) of Theorem 3.5 holds.
Choosing \(\widetilde{R}=46{,}000\), via some computations we can get
$$\begin{aligned}& N^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}=\max \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1,\sigma \widetilde{R}\leq u\leq \widetilde{R}\bigr\} =\widetilde{R}+\widetilde{R} ^{3}, \\& N^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}=\max \biggl\{ f_{1}(t,v):0\leq t\leq 1,0\leq v\leq \frac{1}{6}\varphi _{\frac{3}{2}}\biggl(\frac{1}{6} \biggr)\varphi _{\frac{3}{2}}\bigl(N ^{2}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr)\biggr\} =\biggl(\frac{1}{6}\biggr)^{3}\bigl(\widetilde{R}+ \widetilde{R} ^{3}\bigr), \\& \frac{1}{6}\varphi _{\frac{3}{2}}\biggl(\frac{1}{6}\biggr)\varphi _{\frac{3}{2}}\bigl(N ^{1}_{\widetilde{R}}\bigr)=\biggl( \frac{1}{6}\biggr)^{3}\bigl(\widetilde{R}+\widetilde{R} ^{3}\bigr)^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq \widetilde{R}, \end{aligned}$$
which yields that (ii) of Theorem 3.5 holds. Therefore (3.4) has at least two positive solutions.

Example 3

If \(p=2\), \(n_{1}=m_{1}=1\), and \(n_{2}=m_{2}=1\), then (1.1) is related to the second-order system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} u^{(4)}(t) =f_{1}(t,v), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ v^{(4)}(t) =f_{2}(t,u), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u(0)=u(1)=u''(0)=u''(1)=0, \\ v(0)=v(1)=v''(0)=v''(1)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.5)
where \(f_{1}(t,v)=(t+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}})v^{2}\) and
$$f_{2}(t,u)=\textstyle\begin{cases} tu^{3}, & 0\leq u\leq 1; \\ tu^{\frac{1}{8}}, & 1\leq u. \end{cases} $$
Choosing \(\alpha _{1}=2\), \(\alpha _{2}=\frac{3}{2}\), \(\beta _{1}=2\), \(\beta _{2}=\frac{1}{4}\), and \(\delta =\frac{1}{4}\), it is easy to verify that
$$\begin{aligned}& \overline{\varphi }_{1}^{0}=\limsup_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \max_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]} \frac{f_{1}(t,v)}{v^{\alpha _{1}}}=\limsup_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{( \frac{3}{4}+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}})v^{2}}{v^{2}}= \frac{3}{4}+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}, \\& \overline{\varphi }_{2}^{0}=\limsup_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \max_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]} \frac{f_{2}(t,u)}{u^{\alpha _{2}}}=\limsup_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{ \frac{3}{4}(u^{3})}{u^{\frac{3}{2}}}=0, \\& \overline{\psi }_{1}^{\infty }=\limsup_{v\rightarrow \infty } \max_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]}\frac{f_{1}(t,v)}{v^{\beta _{1}}}= \limsup_{v\rightarrow \infty } \frac{(\frac{3}{4}+ \frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}})v^{2}}{v^{2}}=\frac{3}{4}+\frac{2^{58} \cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}, \\& \overline{\psi }_{2}^{\infty }=\limsup_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \max_{t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]}\frac{f_{2}(t,u)}{u^{\beta _{2}}}= \limsup_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{\frac{3}{4}(u^{\frac{1}{8}})}{u ^{\frac{1}{4}}}=0, \end{aligned}$$
which implies that (i) of Theorem 3.6 holds.
Now, we will show that there exists a such that (ii) of Theorem 3.5 holds. For convenience, choose \(\widehat{R}<1\). Via some computations we can get
$$\begin{aligned}& \theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)=\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)= \frac{1}{4},\qquad \theta _{n_{2}}^{q-1}(\delta)=\theta _{m_{2}}^{q-1}(\delta)= \frac{1}{4}, \qquad \sigma = \frac{1}{4} ,\qquad \varGamma ^{q}=\biggl(\frac{11}{96} \biggr)^{2}, \\& K^{2}_{\widehat{R}} =\min \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):\delta \leq t\leq 1-\delta, \sigma \widehat{R}\leq u\leq \widehat{R}\bigr\} \\& \hphantom{K^{2}_{\widehat{R}}}=\min \biggl\{ f_{2}(t,u):\frac{1}{4}\leq t\leq \frac{3}{4},\frac{1}{4} \widehat{R}\leq u\leq \widehat{R}\biggr\} \\& \hphantom{K^{2}_{\widehat{R}}}=\min \biggl\{ tu^{3}:\frac{1}{4}\leq t\leq \frac{3}{4},\frac{1}{4} \widehat{R}\leq u\leq \widehat{R}\biggr\} = \biggl(\frac{1}{4}\biggr)^{4} \widehat{R}^{3}, \\& N^{2}_{\widehat{R}} =\max \bigl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1,\sigma \widehat{R}\leq u\leq \widehat{R}\bigr\} \\& \hphantom{N^{2}_{\widehat{R}}}=\max \biggl\{ f_{2}(t,u):0\leq t\leq 1, \frac{1}{4} \widehat{R}\leq u \leq \widehat{R}\biggr\} \\& \hphantom{N^{2}_{\widehat{R}}}=\max \biggl\{ tu^{3}:0\leq t\leq 1,\frac{1}{4} \widehat{R}\leq u\leq \widehat{R}\biggr\} =\widetilde{R}^{3}, \\& K^{1}_{\widehat{R}} =\min \biggl\{ f_{1}(t,v):\delta \leq t\leq 1-\delta, \theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)\theta _{m_{2}}^{q-1}( \delta)\varGamma ^{q}\varphi _{q}\bigl(K^{2}_{\widehat{R}} \bigr)\leq v\leq \frac{1}{6^{m_{1}}}\varphi _{q}\biggl( \frac{1}{6^{m _{2}}}\biggr)\varphi _{q}\bigl(N^{2}_{\widehat{R}} \bigr)\biggr\} \\& \hphantom{K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}}= \min \biggl\{ f_{1}(t,v):\frac{1}{4}\leq t\leq \frac{3}{4}, \frac{1}{4^{2}}\biggl(\frac{11}{96} \biggr)^{2}\frac{1}{4^{4}} \widehat{R}^{3} \leq v\leq \frac{1}{6^{2}}\widehat{R}^{3}\biggr\} \\& \hphantom{K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}}=\min \biggl\{ \biggl(t+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}\biggr)v^{2}: \frac{1}{4}\leq t \leq \frac{3}{4},\frac{1}{4^{2}}\biggl( \frac{11}{96}\biggr)^{2}\frac{1}{4^{4}} \widehat{R}^{3} \leq v\leq \frac{1}{6^{2}}\widehat{R}^{3}\biggr\} \\& \hphantom{K^{1}_{\widehat{R}}}=\biggl(\frac{1}{4}+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}\biggr) \frac{1}{4^{12}}\biggl( \frac{11}{96}\biggr)^{4} \widehat{R}^{6}. \end{aligned}$$
Choosing \((\frac{\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}}{\frac{1}{4}+\frac{2^{58} \cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}})^{\frac{1}{5}}<\widehat{R}<1\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)\theta _{n_{2}}^{q-1}(\delta) \varGamma ^{q}\varphi _{q}\bigl(K^{1}_{\widehat{R}} \bigr) =& \frac{1}{4^{2}}\biggl(\frac{11}{96}\biggr)^{2} \biggl( \frac{1}{4}+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}\biggr)\frac{1}{4^{12}} \biggl( \frac{11}{96}\biggr)^{4}\widehat{R}^{6} \\ =&\biggl(\frac{1}{4}+\frac{2^{58}\cdot 3^{6}}{11^{6}}\biggr)\frac{11^{6}}{2^{58} \cdot 3^{6}} \widehat{R}^{6}\geq \widehat{R}, \end{aligned}$$
which yields that (ii) of Theorem 3.6 holds. Therefore (3.5) has at least two positive solutions.

4 Main results of Problem (1.2)

Theorem 4.1

Assume that (H3) or (\(\widetilde{\textrm{H}}\)3) holds. In addition, assume that the functions\(F_{i}\), \(G_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following condition:

there exist\(\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}>0\) (\(i=1,2\)) with\(\alpha _{i} \leq (p-1)\)and\(\beta _{i}\leq (p-1)\)such that
$$ \underline{F}_{1}^{0}=\underline{G}_{1}^{0}=+ \infty \quad \textit{and}\quad \overline{F}_{2}^{\infty }= \overline{G}_{2}^{\infty }=0. $$
Then (1.2) has at least one positive solution.

Proof

Let E denote the Banach space \(C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) with norm \(\|(u,v)\|= \max \{|u(t)|_{1}, |v(t)|_{1}\}\), where \(|u|_{1}=\max_{t\in [0,1]}|u(t)|\). Define the mapping \(A: E\rightarrow E\) by
$$ A(u,v) (t)=\bigl(A_{1}(u,v) (t),A_{2}(u,v) (t)\bigr), $$
where
$$\begin{aligned}& A_{1}(u,v) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s,\tau)f\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds, \\& A_{2}(u,v) (t)= \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m _{2}}(s,\tau)g\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Let \(P=\{u\in C[0,1], u\geq 0\}\), and let K be its subcone defined by
$$ K=\Bigl\{ u\in P:\min_{\delta \leq t\leq 1-\delta }u(t)\geq \sigma (n_{1}) \vert u\vert _{1} \Bigr\} \times \Bigl\{ v:\min_{\delta \leq t\leq 1-\delta }v(t) \geq \sigma (m_{1})\vert v\vert _{1} \Bigr\} . $$
As in the proof of Lemma 3.1, it is clear that \(A : K\rightarrow K\) is completely continuous.
On one hand, from the assumption \(\overline{F}_{2}^{\infty }= \overline{G}_{2}^{\infty }=0\) it follows that there exist \(\varepsilon >0\) and \(\overline{R}>0\) such that
$$ F_{2}(v)\leq \varepsilon v^{\beta _{1}} \quad \text{for } v\geq \overline{R} \quad \text{and} \quad G_{2}(u)\leq \varepsilon u^{\beta _{2}}\quad \text{for } u \geq \overline{R}, $$
where ε satisfies
$$ \varepsilon ^{q-1}\max \bigl\{ L(n_{1},n_{2}),L(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigr\} < 1. $$
For given , let
$$ N_{1}=\max_{0\leq v\leq \overline{R}}F_{2}(v),\qquad N_{2}= \max_{0\leq u\leq \overline{R}}G_{2}(u). $$
Then we have
$$ f(u,v)\leq F_{2}(v)\leq \varepsilon v^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1}, \qquad g(u,v)\leq G _{2}(u)\leq \varepsilon u^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2} \quad \text{for } u,v\geq 0. $$
Furthermore, we have the the estimates
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(u,v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{n_{2}}(s,\tau)f\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \varepsilon v^{\beta _{1}}(\tau)+N _{1}\bigr]\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert v\vert _{1}^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1}\bigr)^{q-1} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(u,v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s,\tau)g\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \varepsilon u^{\beta _{2}}(\tau)+N _{2}\bigr]\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert u\vert _{1}^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2}\bigr)^{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, combining them with the assumption \(\beta _{i}\leq p-1\), we get that there exists a sufficiently large \(R>0\) such that, for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{R}\cap K\),
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert A(u,v)\bigr\Vert \leq &\max \bigl\{ L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert v\vert _{1}^{\beta _{1}}+N _{1} \bigr)^{q-1},L(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert u\vert _{1}^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2}\bigr)^{q-1} \bigr\} \\ \leq & \max \bigl\{ L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon R^{\beta _{1}}+N_{1}\bigr)^{q-1},L(m _{1},m_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon R^{\beta _{2}}+N_{2}\bigr)^{q-1}\bigr\} \leq R. \end{aligned}$$
On the other hand, from the assumption \(\underline{F}_{1}^{0}= \underline{G}_{1}^{0}=+\infty \) it follows that there exist \(M>0\) and \(r<1\) such that
$$ F_{1}(v)\geq M v^{\alpha _{1}}\quad \text{for } 0\leq v\leq r\quad \text{and}\quad G_{1}(u)\geq M u^{\alpha _{2}} \quad \text{for } 0\leq u\leq r, $$
where M satisfies
$$ M^{(q-1)}\min \bigl\{ S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \alpha _{1}),S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{2})\bigr\} \geq 1. $$
Then for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{r}\cap K\) and \(t_{0}\in [ \delta,1-\delta ]\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s,\tau)f\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)F _{1}\bigl(v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)M \sigma ^{\alpha _{1}}(m_{1})\vert v\vert _{1}^{\alpha _{1}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & M^{(q-1)}S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \alpha _{1})\vert v\vert _{1}^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}> \vert v \vert _{1} ^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
In a similar way, we also have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau)\biggr)g \bigl(u(\tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq & M^{(q-1)}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \alpha _{2})\vert u\vert _{1}^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}> \vert u \vert _{1} ^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \max \bigl\{ A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}),A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0}) \bigr\} >&\max \bigl\{ \vert v\vert _{1}^{ \alpha _{1}(q-1)}, \vert u\vert _{1}^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}\bigr\} \\ =&\max \bigl\{ r^{\alpha _{1}(q-1)},r^{\alpha _{2}(q-1)}\bigr\} \geq r. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{r}\cap K\), we have \(\|A(u,v)\|>\|(u,v)\|\).

Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\). □

Theorem 4.2

Assume that (H3) or (\(\widetilde{\textrm{H}}\)3) holds. In addition, let the functions\(F_{i}\), \(G_{i}\) (\(i=1,2\)) satisfy the following assumption:
  • there exist \(\tilde{\alpha }_{i}, \tilde{\beta }_{i}>0\) with \(\tilde{\alpha }_{i}\geq (p-1)\) and \(\tilde{\beta }_{i}\geq (p-1)\) such that
    $$ \underline{F}_{1}^{\infty }=\underline{G}_{1}^{\infty }=+ \infty,\qquad \overline{F}_{2}^{0}=\overline{G}_{2}^{0}=0. $$
Then (1.2) has at least one positive solution.

Proof

On one hand, from the assumption \(\overline{F}_{2} ^{0}=\overline{G}_{2}^{0}=0\) it follows that there exist \(\varepsilon >0\) and \(r<1\) such that
$$ F_{2}(v)\leq \varepsilon v^{\tilde{\beta }_{1}}\quad \text{for } 0\leq v \leq r \quad \text{and}\quad G_{2}(u)\leq \varepsilon u^{\tilde{\beta }_{2}} \quad \text{for } 0\leq u\leq r, $$
where ε satisfies
$$ \varepsilon ^{q-1}\max \bigl\{ L(n_{1},n_{2}),L(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigr\} < 1. $$
Then, for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{r}\cap K\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(u,v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{n_{2}}(s,\tau)f\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{n_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \varepsilon v^{\tilde{\beta } _{1}}(\tau)\bigr]\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(n_{1},n_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert v\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\beta }_{1}}\bigr)^{q-1} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(u,v) (t) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t,s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G _{m_{2}}(s,\tau)g\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \leq & \int _{0}^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{1}-1}}s(1-s)\varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0} ^{1}\frac{1}{6^{m_{2}-1}}\tau (1-\tau)\bigl[ \varepsilon u^{\tilde{\beta } _{2}}(\tau)\bigr]\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ =&L(m_{1},m_{2}) \bigl(\varepsilon \vert u\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\beta }_{2}}\bigr)^{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, combining these inequalities with the assumption \(\tilde{\beta }_{i}\geq p-1\), we have
$$ \bigl\Vert A(u,v)\bigr\Vert < \max \bigl\{ \vert v\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\beta }_{1} (q-1)}, \vert u\vert _{1}^{ \tilde{\beta }_{2}(q-1)} \bigr\} \leq r. $$
On the other hand, from the assumption \(\underline{F}_{1}^{\infty }= \underline{G}_{1}^{\infty }=+\infty \) it follows that there exist \(M>0\) and \(\overline{R}>r\) such that
$$ F_{1}(v)\geq M v^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}} \quad \text{for } v\geq \overline{R} \quad \text{and}\quad G_{1}(u)\geq M u^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}} \quad \text{for } u\geq \overline{R}, $$
where M satisfies
$$ M^{(q-1)}\min \bigl\{ S(n_{1},n_{2},n_{1}, \tilde{\alpha }_{1}),S(m_{1},m _{2},m_{1}, \tilde{\alpha }_{2})\bigr\} \geq 1. $$
Set \(R=\max \{\frac{\overline{R}}{\sigma (n_{1})}+1,\frac{ \overline{R}}{\sigma (m_{1})}+1\}\). Let
$$ D_{1}=\min_{0\leq u \leq R}F_{1}\bigl(v(\tau) \bigr),\qquad D_{2}=\min_{0\leq u \leq R}G_{1} \bigl(u(\tau)\bigr). $$
Then, for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{R}\cap K\) and \(t_{0}\in [ \delta,1-\delta ]\), we consider two cases.
Case i: If \(\|(u,v)\|=|v|_{1}=R\), then \(\min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}v(t)\geq \sigma (m_{1})|v|_{1}>\overline{R}\), and we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s,\tau)f\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)F _{1}\bigl(v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{n_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)M \sigma ^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}}(m_{1})\vert v\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & M^{(q-1)}S(n_{1},n_{2},m_{1}, \tilde{\alpha }_{1})\vert v\vert _{1}^{ \tilde{\alpha }_{1}(q-1)}> \vert v\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}(q-1)} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau)\biggr)g \bigl(u(\tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m _{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)G_{1}\bigl(u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m _{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)D_{2}\,d\tau)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& \max \bigl\{ A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}),A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0})\bigr\} \\& \quad > \max \biggl\{ \vert v\vert _{1}^{ \tilde{\alpha }_{1}(q-1)}, \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)D_{2}\,d\tau)\,ds\biggr\} \\& \quad \geq \vert v\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}(q-1)}=R^{\tilde{\alpha }_{1}(q-1)} \geq R. \end{aligned}$$
Case ii: If \(\|(u,v)\|=|u|_{1}=R\), then \(\min_{t\in [\delta,1-\delta ]}u(t)\geq \sigma (n_{1})|u|_{1}>\overline{R}\), and we have
$$\begin{aligned} A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{mn{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s,\tau)\biggr)f \bigl(u(\tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)F_{1}\bigl(v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n _{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)D_{1}\,d\tau)\,ds \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0}) =& \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{m_{2}}(s,\tau)g\bigl(u( \tau),v(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)G _{1}\bigl(u(\tau)\bigr)\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{1}}(\delta)s(1-s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{\delta }^{1-\delta }\theta _{m_{2}}(\delta)\tau (1-\tau)M \sigma ^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}}(n_{1})\vert u\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}}\,d\tau\biggr)\,ds \\ \geq & M^{(q-1)}S(m_{1},m_{2},n_{1}, \tilde{\alpha }_{2})\vert u\vert _{1}^{ \tilde{\alpha }_{2}(q-1)}> \vert u\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& \max \bigl\{ A_{1}(u,v) (t_{0}),A_{2}(u,v) (t_{0})\bigr\} \\& \quad > \max \biggl\{ \int _{0}^{1}G _{n_{1}}(t_{0},s) \varphi _{q}\biggl( \int _{0}^{1}G_{n_{2}}(s,\tau) \biggr)D_{1}\,d\tau)\,ds, \vert u\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}(q-1)} \biggr\} \\& \quad \geq \vert u\vert _{1}^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}(q-1)}=R^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}(q-1)} \geq R. \end{aligned}$$
So, for any \((u,v)\in \partial \varOmega _{R}\cap K\), we have \(\|A(u,v)\|> \|(u,v)\|\).

Therefore by Lemma 2.5 the operator A has at least one fixed point in \(K\cap (\overline{\varOmega }_{R}\setminus \varOmega _{r})\). □

Example 4

Let \(\alpha,\beta >0\) and \(p=4\). Then, for the problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{n} {[\varphi _{4}({u^{(2n_{1})})}]}^{({2n_{2}})} =(\sin (u+v)+1)v^{\alpha }(t), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ (-1)^{m}{[ \varphi _{4}(v^{(2m_{1})})]}^{(2m_{2})} =(e^{-v}+\arctan (u+1))u ^{\beta }(t), \quad t\in (0,1), \\ u^{(2i)}(0)=u^{(2i)}(1)=0, \quad i=0,1,\ldots,n-1, \\ v^{(2j)}(0)=v^{(2j)}(1)=0, \quad j=0,1,\ldots,m-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
it is obvious that
$$\begin{aligned}& F_{1}(v)=v^{\alpha }(t)\leq f(u,v)=\bigl(\sin (u+v)+1 \bigr)v^{\alpha }(t)\leq F _{2}(v)= 2v^{\alpha }(t), \\& G_{2}(u)=\frac{\pi }{4}u^{\beta }(t)\leq g(u,v)= \bigl(e^{-v}+\arctan (u+1)\bigr)u ^{\beta }(t)\leq G_{2}(u)=\biggl(1+\frac{\pi }{2}\biggr)u^{\beta }(t). \end{aligned}$$

We choose \(\alpha _{1}=\widetilde{\alpha }_{1}=3\), \(\alpha _{2}= \tilde{\alpha }_{2}=\frac{\beta +3}{2}\), \(\beta _{1}=\tilde{\beta } _{1}=\frac{3\alpha +3}{4}\), \(\beta _{2}=\tilde{\beta }_{2}=\frac{4 \beta +3}{5}\).

Case I. If \(\alpha, \beta <3\), then it is easy to verify that
$$\begin{aligned}& \underline{F}_{1}^{0}=\liminf_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{F_{1}(v)}{c ^{\alpha _{1}}}=\liminf_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{v^{\alpha }}{v^{3}}=+ \infty, \\& \overline{F}_{2}^{\infty }=\limsup_{v\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{F_{2}(v)}{v ^{\beta _{1}}}=\limsup_{v\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{v^{\alpha }}{v^{\frac{3 \alpha +3}{4}}}=0, \\& \underline{G}_{1}^{0}=\liminf_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{G_{1}(u)}{u ^{\alpha _{2}}}=\liminf_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{u^{\beta }}{u^{\frac{ \beta +3}{2}}}=+\infty, \\& \overline{G}_{2}^{\infty }=\limsup_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{G _{2}(u)}{u^{\beta _{2}}}=\limsup_{u\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{u^{ \beta }}{u^{\frac{4\beta +3}{5}}}=0. \end{aligned}$$
So by Theorem 4.1 the problem has at least one positive solution.
Case II. If \(\alpha, \beta >3\), then it is easy to verify that
$$\begin{aligned}& \underline{F}_{1}^{\infty }=\liminf_{v\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{F _{1}(v)}{v^{\widetilde{\alpha }_{1}}}=\liminf_{v\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{v ^{\alpha }}{v^{3}}=+\infty, \\& \overline{F}_{2}^{0}=\limsup_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{F_{2}(v)}{v ^{\tilde{\beta }_{1}}}=\limsup_{v\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{v^{\alpha }}{v ^{\frac{3\alpha +3}{4}}}=0, \\& \underline{G}_{1}^{\infty }=\liminf_{u\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{G _{1}(u)}{u^{\tilde{\alpha }_{2}}}=\liminf_{u\rightarrow +\infty }\frac{u ^{\beta }}{u^{\frac{\beta +3}{2}}}=+\infty, \\& \overline{G}_{2}^{0}=\limsup_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{G_{2}(u)}{u ^{\tilde{\beta }_{2}}}=\limsup_{u\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{u^{\beta }}{u ^{\frac{4\beta +3}{5}}}=0. \end{aligned}$$
So by Theorem 4.2 the problem has at least one positive solution.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referee for his/her valuable comments and helpful suggestions, which have led to an improvement of the presentation of this paper.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors were supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (No. 2018B58614).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    D’Ambrosio, L., Mitidieri, E.: Quasilinear elliptic equations with critical potentials. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 6(2), 147–164 (2017) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Ambrosio, L., Mitidieri, E.: Quasilinear elliptic systems in divergence form associated to general nonlinearities. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 7(4), 425–447 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Djellit, A., Tas, S.: Quasilinear elliptic systems with critical Sobolev exponents in \(R^{N}\). Nonlinear Anal. 66, 1485–1497 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aghajnt, A., Shamshiri, J.: Multiplicity of positive solutions for quasilinear elliptic p-Laplacian systems. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 111 (2012) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papageorgiou, N., Radulescu, V., Repovs, D.: Modern Nonlinear Analysis – Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2019) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lakmeche, A., Hammoudi, A.: Multiple positive solutions of the one-dimensional p-Laplacian. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 317, 43–49 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bai, Z., Huang, B., Ge, W.: The iterative solutions for some fourth-order p-Laplace equation boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Lett. 19, 8–14 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, J., Yang, Z.: Positive solutions for a fourth order p-Laplacian boundary value problem. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 2612–2623 (2011) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, X., Liu, L.: Positive solutions of fourth-order four point boundary value problems with p-Laplacian operator. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 336, 1414–1423 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, X., Liu, L.: A necessary and sufficient condition for positive solutions for fourth-order multi-point boundary value problems with p-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 68, 3127–3137 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, X.: Positive solutions for a 2nth-order p-Laplacian boundary value problems involving all derivatives. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 36 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Djebali, S., Moussaoui, T., Precup, R.: Fourth-order p-Laplacian nonlinear systems via the vector version of Krasnosel’skii’s fixed point theorem. Mediterr. J. Math. 6, 447–460 (2009) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Precup, R.: A vector version of Krasnosel’skii’s fixed point theorem in cones and positive periodic solutions of nonlinear systems. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2, 141–151 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prasad, K., Kameswararao, A.: Positive solutions for the system of higher order singular nonlinear boundary value problem. Math. Commun. 18, 49–60 (2013) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ru, Y., An, Y.: Positive solutions for 2p-order and 2q-order nonlinear ordinary differential systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 324, 1093–1104 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, X.: Existence of positive solutions for 2m-order nonlinear differential systems. Nonlinear Anal. 61, 77–95 (2005) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang, P., Xu, J., Wei, Z.: Positive solutions for 2p-order and 2q-order systems of singular boundary value problems with integral boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 72, 2767–2786 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krasnosel’skii, M.A.: Positive Solution of Operator Equations. Noordhoff, Groningnen (1964) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General EducationArmy Engineering University of PLANanjingP.R. China
  2. 2.College of ScienceChina Pharmaceutical UniversityNanjingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations