Advertisement

Lyapunov-type inequalities for nonlinear fractional differential equations and systems involving Caputo-type fractional derivatives

  • Mohamed Jleli
  • Bessem SametEmail author
  • Yong Zhou
Open Access
Research
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

A Lyapunov-type inequality is derived for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem involving Caputo-type fractional derivative. The obtained inequality provides a necessary condition for the existence of nontrivial solutions to the considered problem. Next, we extend our study to the case of systems.

Keywords

Lyapunov-type inequalities Caputo-type fractional derivative Systems 

MSC

26D10 34A08 26A33 

1 Introduction

In this paper, we are concerned with the nonlinear fractional boundary value problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + \varphi (t,u)=0, \quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(1.1)
where \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), \(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\), \({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\) is the (left-sided) Caputo-type fractional derivative of order α and \(\varphi : [a,b]\times C([a,b]) \to \mathbb{R}\) is a given function. We establish a Lyapunov-type inequality for the considered problem. Such inequality provides a necessary condition for the existence of nontrivial solutions to (1.1). Next, we study the system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + \varphi (t,u,v)=0, \quad a< t< b, \\ ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(t) + \psi (t,u,v)=0, \quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(1.2)
where \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), \(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\) and \(\varphi , \psi : [a,b]\times C([a,b])\times C([a,b])\to \mathbb{R}\) are given functions. Let us mention some motivations for studying problems as in (1.1) and (1.2).
The classical Lyapunov inequality [23] is related to the second order linear differential equation
$$ u''(t)+q(t)u(t)=0,\quad a< t< b, $$
(1.3)
under the boundary conditions
$$ u(a)=u(b)=0, $$
(1.4)
where \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(a< b\) and \(q\in C([a,b])\). It shows that if (1.3)–(1.4) admits a nontrivial solution \(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\), then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \,dt> \frac{4}{b-a}. $$
(1.5)
Inequality (1.5) has found many practical applications in the theory of differential equations (see, for example, [2, 5, 22, 32, 34] and the references therein). For more improvements and generalizations of (1.5), we refer to [1, 4, 6, 10, 13, 24, 28, 29, 30, 33] and the references therein. On the other hand, due to the great attention which has been given in these last years to fractional calculus, several results related to the study of Lyapunov-type inequalities for fractional differential equations were obtained. The first work in this direction is due to Ferreira [11], where the standard derivative \(u''\) in (1.3) is replaced by \(D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u\), the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative of order \(1<\alpha <2\) of u. Next, in [12], the same author studied the fractional boundary value problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}^{C} D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + q(t)u(t) =0,\quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(1.6)
where \(1<\alpha <2\), \({}^{C} D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\) is the Caputo fractional derivative of order α and \(q\in C([a,b])\). The main result in [12] is the following: Let \(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\) be a nontrivial solution to (1.6), then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \,dt > \frac{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[( \alpha -1)(b-a)]^{\alpha -1}}. $$
(1.7)
Note that in the limit case \(\alpha \to 2^{-}\), (1.6) reduces to (1.3). Moreover, observe that in the limit case \(\alpha \to 2^{-}\), (1.7) reduces to (1.5). For other contributions related to Lyapunov-type inequalities for fractional differential equations, we refer to [3, 7, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 26, 27] and the references therein. Motivated by the above cited works, a study of Lyapunov-type inequalities for problems (1.1) and (1.2) is performed in this paper.

The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we provide some preliminary results related to fractional calculus and operator theory. In Sect. 3, a Lyapunov-type inequality is established for problem (1.1) and some particular cases are discussed. In Sect. 4, we derive a Lyapunov-type inequality for system (1.2) and discuss some special cases.

2 Preliminaries

Let \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\) be such that \(0< a< b\). We refer the reader to Samko et al. [31] for the following concepts.

Definition 2.1

Let \(\theta >0\). The (left-sided) Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order θ of a function \(f\in C([a,b])\) is given by
$$ \bigl(I_{a^{+}}^{\theta }f \bigr) (t)=\frac{1}{\varGamma (\theta )} \int _{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\theta -1} f(s) \,ds,\quad a \leq t\leq b, $$
where Γ is the Gamma function.

Definition 2.2

Let \(n-1<\alpha <n\), where \(n\geq 1\) is a natural number. The (left-sided) Caputo fractional derivative of order α of a function \(f\in C^{n}([a,b])\) is given by
$$ \bigl({}^{C}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \bigl(I_{a^{+}}^{n- \alpha }f^{(n)} \bigr) (t),\quad a\leq t\leq b, $$
i.e.,
$$ \bigl({}^{C}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \frac{1}{\varGamma (n- \alpha )} \int _{a}^{t} (t-s)^{n-\alpha -1} f^{(n)}(s) \,ds,\quad a \leq t\leq b. $$

In [20] (see also [21]), Katugampola introduced the following fractional integral operator, which depends on a certain parameter \(\rho >0\).

Definition 2.3

Let \(\rho >0\) and \(\theta >0\). The (left-sided) Katugampola fractional integral of order θ of a function \(f\in C([a,b])\) is given by
$$ \bigl({}^{\rho }I_{a^{+}}^{\theta }f \bigr) (t)= \frac{\rho ^{1-\theta }}{\varGamma (\theta )} \int _{a}^{t} s^{\rho -1} \bigl(t^{\rho }-s^{\rho }\bigr)^{ \theta -1} f(s) \,ds,\quad a\leq t \leq b. $$

Using the above definition, D.S. Oliveira and E.C. de Oliveira [25] introduced a Caputo-type fractional derivative operator as follows.

Definition 2.4

Let \(\rho >0\) and \(n-1<\alpha <n\), where \(n\geq 1\) is a natural number. The (left-sided) Caputo-type fractional derivative of order α of a function \(f\in C^{n}([a,b])\) is given by
$$ \bigl({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \biggl({}^{ \rho }I_{a^{+}}^{n-\alpha } \biggl(t^{1-\rho } \frac{d}{dt} \biggr)^{n} f \biggr) (t),\quad a\leq t\leq b, $$
i.e.,
$$ \bigl({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \frac{ \rho ^{1-n+\alpha }}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )} \int _{a}^{t} s^{\rho -1} \bigl(t ^{\rho }-s^{\rho }\bigr)^{n-\alpha -1} \biggl(s^{1-\rho } \frac{d}{ds} \biggr) ^{n} f(s) \,ds,\quad a\leq t\leq b. $$
Observe that for \(\rho =1\) we have
$$ {}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f={}^{C}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f. $$
Moreover, we have (see [25])
$$ \lim_{\rho \to 0^{+}} \bigl({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \bigl({}^{\mathrm{CH}}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t), \quad a\leq t\leq b, $$
(2.1)
where \({}^{\mathrm{CH}}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\) is the Caputo–Hadamard fractional derivative of order α given by
$$ \bigl({}^{\mathrm{CH}}D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)=\frac{1}{\varGamma (n- \alpha )} \int _{a}^{t} \biggl(\ln \frac{t}{s} \biggr)^{n-\alpha -1} \biggl(s\frac{d}{ds} \biggr)^{n} f(s) \,ds, \quad a\leq t\leq b. $$
(2.2)
Further, let us fix \(\rho >0\). We introduce the mapping
$$ T: C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\to C\bigl(\bigl[a^{\rho },b^{\rho }\bigr] \bigr) $$
defined by
$$ (Tf) (z)=f \bigl(z^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr),\quad a^{\rho } \leq z \leq b^{\rho }, $$
(2.3)
for all \(f\in C([a,b])\). Observe that the mapping T is invertible and its inverse is the mapping
$$ T^{-1}: C\bigl(\bigl[a^{\rho },b^{\rho }\bigr]\bigr)\to C \bigl([a,b]\bigr) $$
defined by
$$ \bigl(T^{-1}g \bigr) (t)=g \bigl(t^{\rho } \bigr),\quad a\leq t \leq b, $$
(2.4)
for all \(g\in C([a^{\rho },b^{\rho }])\).

The following lemma will play an essential role in the proofs of our main results.

Lemma 2.1

Let\(n-1<\alpha <n\), where\(n\geq 1\)is a natural number. For any function\(f\in C^{n}([a,b])\), we have
$$ \bigl({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t)= \rho ^{\alpha } \bigl({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }Tf \bigr) \bigl(t^{\rho }\bigr), \quad a\leq t\leq b. $$

Proof

For \(a\leq s\leq b\), let us consider the change of variable
$$ \widetilde{s}=s^{\rho }. $$
Using the chain rule, we get
$$ \frac{d}{ds}=\frac{d}{d\widetilde{s}} \frac{d\widetilde{s}}{ds}= \rho s^{\rho -1} \frac{d}{d\widetilde{s}}. $$
Hence, for \(a\leq t\leq b\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }f \bigr) (t) =&\frac{ \rho ^{1-n+\alpha }}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )} \int _{a}^{t} s^{\rho -1} \bigl(t ^{\rho }-s^{\rho }\bigr)^{n-\alpha -1} \biggl(s^{1-\rho } \frac{d}{ds} \biggr) ^{n} f(s) \,ds \\ =&\frac{\rho ^{\alpha }}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )} \int _{a^{\rho }}^{t^{ \rho }} \bigl(t^{\rho }-\widetilde{s} \bigr)^{n-\alpha -1} \biggl(\frac{d}{d \widetilde{s}} \biggr)^{n} f \bigl( \widetilde{s}^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,d\widetilde{s} \\ =& \frac{\rho ^{\alpha }}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )} \int _{a^{\rho }}^{t^{ \rho }} \bigl(t^{\rho }-\widetilde{s} \bigr)^{n-\alpha -1} \biggl(\frac{d}{d \widetilde{s}} \biggr)^{n} (Tf) ( \widetilde{s}) \,d\widetilde{s} \\ =& \rho ^{\alpha } \bigl({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }Tf \bigr) \bigl(t ^{\rho }\bigr). \end{aligned}$$
 □

The proof of the following lemma can be found in [12].

Lemma 2.2

Let\(h\in C([A,B])\), where\(A,B\in \mathbb{R}\), \(A< B\). Let\(v\in C ^{2}([A,B])\)be a solution to the fractional boundary value problem
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}^{C} D_{A^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(t) + h(t)=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ v(A)=v(B)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
where\(1<\alpha <2\). Then
$$ v(t)= \int _{A}^{B} G(t,s) h(s) \,ds,\quad A\leq t\leq b, $$
where
$$\begin{aligned} G(t,s)=\frac{1}{\varGamma (\alpha )} \textstyle\begin{cases} \frac{(t-A)(B-s)^{\alpha -1}}{B-A}-(t-s)^{\alpha -1},& A\leq s \leq t\leq B, \\ \frac{(t-A)(B-s)^{\alpha -1}}{B-A},& A\leq t\leq s\leq B. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
Moreover, we have
$$ \bigl\vert G(t,s) \bigr\vert \leq \frac{[(\alpha -1)(B-A)]^{\alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha } \varGamma (\alpha )},\quad (t,s)\in [A,B]\times [A,B]. $$
(2.5)

Further, let us recall some notions of operator theory that will be used later (see, for example, [9, 19]).

Let \(N\geq 1\) be a given natural number. We introduce in \(\mathbb{R} ^{N}\) the partial order \(\preceq _{N}\) defined by
x = ( x 1 x 2 x N ) N y = ( y 1 y 2 y N ) x i y i , i = 1 , 2 , , N . Open image in new window
The zero vector of \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\) is denoted by \(0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\). We denote by \(\|\cdot \|_{N}\) the Euclidean norm in \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\), i.e.,
x N = ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + + x N 2 ) 1 2 , x = ( x 1 x 2 x N ) R N . Open image in new window

Lemma 2.3

Let
x = ( x 1 x 2 x N ) , y = ( y 1 y 2 y N ) R N Open image in new window
be such that
$$ 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\preceq _{N} \vec{x}\preceq _{N} \vec{y}. $$
Then
$$ \Vert \vec{x} \Vert _{N}\leq \Vert \vec{y} \Vert _{N}. $$
Let \(\mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R})\) be the set of square matrices of size N with entries in \(\mathbb{R}\). We denote by \(\mathcal{M}_{N}( \mathbb{R}_{+})\) the subset of \(\mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R})\) with positive entries. We endow \(\mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R})\) with the subordinate matrix norm
$$ \Vert A \Vert _{\mathcal{M}_{N}}= \sup_{\vec{x}\in \mathbb{R}^{N},\vec{x}\neq 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}} \frac{ \Vert A\vec{x} \Vert _{N}}{ \Vert \vec{x} \Vert _{N}},\quad A\in \mathcal{M}_{N}( \mathbb{R}). $$
Given \(A\in \mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R})\), we denote by \(r(A)\) its spectral radius, i.e.,
$$ r(A)=\max \bigl\{ \bigl\vert \lambda _{i}(A) \bigr\vert : i=1,2,\dots ,N\bigr\} , $$
where \(\lambda _{i}(A)\), \(i=1,2,\dots ,N\), are the (real or complex) eigenvalues of matrix A.

Lemma 2.4

Let\(A\in \mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R})\). Then
$$ r(A)< 1\quad \Longleftrightarrow\quad \lim_{n\to \infty } \bigl\Vert A^{n} \bigr\Vert _{\mathcal{M} _{N}}=0. $$

Further, we shall prove the following property, which will be used later.

Lemma 2.5

Let\(A\in \mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R}_{+})\)and\(\vec{x}\in \mathbb{R} ^{N}\), \(\vec{x}\neq 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\). If
$$ 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\preceq _{N} \vec{x} \preceq _{N} A \vec{x}, $$
(2.6)
then
$$ r(A)\geq 1. $$
(2.7)

Proof

Using (2.6) and the fact that \(A\in \mathcal{M}_{N}(\mathbb{R} _{+})\), for all natural numbers \(n\geq 1\), we obtain
$$ 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\preceq _{N} \vec{x} \preceq _{N} A^{n} \vec{x}. $$
Therefore, by Lemma 2.3, we have
$$ \Vert \vec{x} \Vert _{N}\leq \bigl\Vert A^{n}\vec{x} \bigr\Vert _{N} \leq \bigl\Vert A^{n} \bigr\Vert _{\mathcal{M} _{N}} \Vert \vec{x} \Vert _{N},\quad n\geq 1. $$
Since \(\vec{x}\neq 0_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\), dividing by \(\|\vec{x}\|_{N}\), we get
$$ \bigl\Vert A^{n} \bigr\Vert _{\mathcal{M}_{N}}\geq 1,\quad n\geq 1. $$
Finally, using Lemma 2.4, (2.7) follows. □
In the sequel, the functional space \(C([a,b])\) is equipped with the norm
$$ \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }=\max_{a\leq t\leq b} \bigl\vert u(t) \bigr\vert ,\quad u\in C\bigl([a,b]\bigr). $$

3 A Lyapunov-type inequality for problem (1.1)

Problem (1.1) is investigated under the following assumption: The function
$$ \varphi : [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\to \mathbb{R} $$
is continuous and satisfies
$$ \bigl\vert \varphi (t,h) \bigr\vert \leq w(t) \Vert h \Vert _{\infty },\quad (t,h)\in [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr), $$
(3.1)
where \(w\in C([a,b])\).

Observe that by (3.1), the zero function is a solution to (1.1).

Our main result in this section is the following.

Theorem 3.1

Let\(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (1.1). Then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} w(t)t^{\rho -1} \,dt\geq \frac{\rho ^{\alpha -1} \alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}. $$
(3.2)

Proof

Let \(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\) be a nontrivial solution to (1.1). Let us introduce the function \(v\in C^{2}([a^{\rho },b^{\rho }])\) given by
$$ v=Tu, $$
where T is the mapping defined by (2.3). Using Lemma 2.1, we deduce that v is a solution to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} \rho ^{\alpha } ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(t ^{\rho }) + \varphi (t,T^{-1}v)=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ v(a^{\rho })=v(b^{\rho })=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
where \(T^{-1}\) is given by (2.4). Using the change of variable \(z=t^{\rho }\), \(a\leq t\leq b\), we deduce that v is a solution to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(z) + \rho ^{- \alpha }\varphi (z^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1}v)=0,\quad a^{\rho }< z< b ^{\rho }, \\ v(a^{\rho })=v(b^{\rho })=0. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.2 with \(A=a^{\rho }\), \(B=b^{\rho }\), we obtain
$$ v(z)=\rho ^{-\alpha } \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} G(z,s) \varphi \bigl(s ^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1}v\bigr) \,ds,\quad a^{\rho }\leq z\leq b^{\rho }. $$
Further, (2.5) and (3.1) yield
$$ \bigl\vert v(z) \bigr\vert \leq \rho ^{-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \biggl( \int _{a^{\rho }} ^{b^{\rho }} w \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \bigl\Vert T^{-1}v \bigr\Vert _{\infty },\quad a^{\rho }\leq z\leq b^{\rho }, $$
i.e.,
$$ \bigl\vert u \bigl(z^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \bigr\vert \leq \rho ^{-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{ \alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \biggl( \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w \bigl(s ^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \Vert u \Vert _{\infty },\quad a^{ \rho }\leq z\leq b^{\rho }, $$
i.e.,
$$ \bigl\vert u(t) \bigr\vert \leq \rho ^{-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \biggl( \int _{a^{\rho }} ^{b^{\rho }} w \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \Vert u \Vert _{\infty },\quad a\leq t\leq b. $$
Hence, we get
$$ \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }\leq \rho ^{-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a ^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \biggl( \int _{a ^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }. $$
Since u is nontrivial, dividing by \(\|u\|_{\infty }\), we obtain
$$ \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \geq \frac{\rho ^{\alpha }\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b ^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}. $$
Finally, using the change of variable \(t=s^{\frac{1}{\rho }}\), \(a^{\rho }\leq s\leq b^{\rho }\), (3.2) follows. □

Further, we list some consequences following from Theorem 3.1.

Corollary 3.1

Let\(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\), \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), be a nontrivial solution to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + q(t) \vert u(t) \vert ^{ \lambda } \ln (1+ \vert u(t) \vert ^{1-\lambda })=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.3)
where\(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\), \(0<\lambda <1\)and\(q\in C([a,b])\). Then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} t^{\rho -1} \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \,dt \geq \frac{\rho ^{\alpha -1} \alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}. $$
(3.4)

Proof

Observe that (3.3) is a special case of (1.1) with
$$ \varphi (t,h)=q(t) \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{\lambda } \ln \bigl(1+ \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{1-\lambda }\bigr), \quad (t,h)\in [a,b]\times C \bigl([a,b]\bigr). $$
Moreover, using the inequality
$$ \ln (1+x)\leq x,\quad x\geq 0, $$
for all \((t,h)\in [a,b]\times C([a,b])\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \varphi (t,h) \bigr\vert \leq & \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{\lambda } \ln \bigl(1+ \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{1- \lambda }\bigr) \\ \leq & \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{\lambda } \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert ^{1-\lambda } \\ =& \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert h(t) \bigr\vert \\ \leq & \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \Vert h \Vert _{\infty }. \end{aligned}$$
Hence, function φ satisfies (3.1) with
$$ w(t)= \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert ,\quad a\leq t\leq b. $$
(3.5)
Therefore, using Theorem 3.1 with w given by (3.5), (3.4) follows. □

Corollary 3.2

(The case of a nonlocal source term)

Let\(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\), \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), be a nontrivial solution to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + \frac{q(t)}{ \varGamma (\theta )}\int _{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\theta -1} u(s) \,ds =0,\quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)
where\(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\), \(\theta >0\)and\(q\in C([a,b])\). Then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} t^{\rho -1} (t-a)^{\theta } \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \,dt \geq \frac{ \rho ^{\alpha -1}\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\theta +1) \varGamma (\alpha )}{[( \alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}. $$
(3.7)

Proof

Observe that (3.6) is a special case of (1.1) with
$$ \varphi (t,h)=\frac{q(t)}{\varGamma (\theta )} \int _{a}^{t} (t-s)^{ \theta -1} h(s) \,ds,\quad (t,h)\in [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr). $$
Moreover, for all \((t,h)\in [a,b]\times C([a,b])\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \varphi (t,h) \bigr\vert \leq & \Vert h \Vert _{\infty }\frac{ \vert q(t) \vert }{\varGamma (\theta )} \int _{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\theta -1} \,ds \\ =& \frac{(t-a)^{\theta } \vert q(t) \vert }{\varGamma (\theta +1)} \Vert h \Vert _{\infty }. \end{aligned}$$
Hence, function φ satisfies (3.1) with
$$ w(t)=\frac{(t-a)^{\theta } \vert q(t) \vert }{\varGamma (\theta +1)},\quad a\leq t \leq b. $$
(3.8)
Therefore, using Theorem 3.1 with w given by (3.8), (3.7) follows. □
Note that in the limit case \(\theta \to 0^{+}\), (3.6) reduces to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + q(t)u(t) =0, \quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.9)
Therefore, passing to the limit as \(\theta \to 0^{+}\) in (3.7), we obtain the following result.

Corollary 3.3

Let\(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (3.9). Then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} t^{\rho -1} \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert \,dt \geq \frac{\rho ^{\alpha -1} \alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}. $$
(3.10)

Remark 3.1

For \(\rho =1\), (3.9) reduces to (1.6). Therefore, taking \(\rho =1\) in (3.10), we obtain (1.7) (with a large inequality).

In the limit case \(\rho \to 0^{+}\), by (2.1), (3.9) reduces to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}^{\mathrm{CH}} D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + q(t)u(t)=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)
where \({}^{\mathrm{CH}} D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }\) is the Caputo–Hadamard fractional derivative of order α given by (2.2) with \(n=2\). Therefore, passing to the limit as \(\rho \to 0^{+}\) in (3.10), we obtain the following result.

Corollary 3.4

Let\(u\in C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (3.11). Then
$$ \int _{a}^{b} \frac{ \vert q(t) \vert }{t} \,dt\geq \frac{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma ( \alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(\ln b-\ln a)]^{\alpha -1}}. $$

4 A Lyapunov-type inequality for system (1.2)

System (1.2) is investigated under the following assumptions:
(A1)
The function
$$ \varphi : [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\to \mathbb{R} $$
is continuous and satisfies
$$ \bigl\vert \varphi (t,g,h) \bigr\vert \leq w_{11}(t) \Vert g \Vert _{\infty }+w_{12}(t) \Vert h \Vert _{ \infty }, \quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr), $$
where \(w_{11},w_{12}\in C([a,b])\) are positive functions.
(A2)
The function
$$ \psi : [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\to \mathbb{R} $$
is continuous and satisfies
$$ \bigl\vert \psi (t,g,h) \bigr\vert \leq w_{21}(t) \Vert g \Vert _{\infty }+w_{22}(t) \Vert h \Vert _{\infty }, \quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr), $$
where \(w_{21},w_{22}\in C([a,b])\) are positive functions.

We say that \((u,v)\in C^{2}([a,b])\times C^{2}([a,b])\) is a nontrivial solution to (1.2) if \((u,v)\) satisfies (1.2) and \((u,v)\not \equiv (0,0)\), where 0 is the zero function. Observe that by (A1) and (A2), \((0,0)\) is a solution to (1.2).

Our main result in this section is the following.

Theorem 4.1

Let\((u,v)\in C^{2}([a,b])\times C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (1.2). Then
$$ \begin{aligned}[b] &\sqrt{ \biggl( \int _{a}^{b} \bigl(w_{11}(t)-w_{22}(t) \bigr)t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr) ^{2}+4 \biggl( \int _{a}^{b} w_{21}(t)t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr) \biggl( \int _{a}^{b} w_{12}(t)t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr)} \\ &\quad {}+ \int _{a}^{b} \bigl(w_{11}(t)+w _{22}(t)\bigr)t^{\rho -1} \,dt\geq \frac{2\rho ^{\alpha -1}\alpha ^{\alpha } \varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}. \end{aligned} $$
(4.1)

Proof

Let \((u,v)\in C^{2}([a,b])\times C^{2}([a,b])\) be a nontrivial solution to (1.2). We introduce the functions \((\bar{u},\bar{v})\in C^{2}([a ^{\rho },b^{\rho }])\times C^{2}([a^{\rho },b^{\rho }])\) given by
$$ \bar{u}=Tu \quad \text{and}\quad \bar{v}=Tv. $$
Using Lemma 2.1, we deduce that \((\bar{u},\bar{v})\) is a solution to the system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} \rho ^{\alpha } ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }\bar{u} )(t ^{\rho }) + \varphi (t,T^{-1}\bar{u},T^{-1}\bar{v})=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ \rho ^{\alpha } ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }\bar{v} )(t ^{\rho }) + \psi (t,T^{-1}\bar{u},T^{-1}\bar{v})=0,\quad a< t< b, \\ \bar{u}(a^{\rho })=\bar{u}(b^{\rho })=\bar{v}(a^{\rho })=\bar{v}(b ^{\rho })=0. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
Using the change of variable \(z=t^{\rho }\), \(a\leq t\leq b\), we deduce that \((\bar{u},\bar{v})\) is a solution to
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }\bar{u} )(z) + \rho ^{-\alpha }\varphi (z^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1}\bar{u},T^{-1} \bar{v})=0,\quad a^{\rho }< z< b^{\rho }, \\ ({}^{C}D_{{a^{\rho }}^{+}}^{\alpha }\bar{v} )(z) + \rho ^{-\alpha }\psi (z^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1}\bar{u},T^{-1}\bar{v})=0, \quad a^{\rho }< z< b^{\rho }, \\ \bar{u}(a^{\rho })=\bar{u}(b^{\rho })=\bar{v}(a^{\rho })=\bar{v}(b ^{\rho })=0. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.2 with \(A=a^{\rho }\), \(B=b^{\rho }\), we obtain
$$ \bar{u}(z)=\rho ^{-\alpha } \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} G(z,s) \varphi \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1} \bar{u},T^{-1}\bar{v}\bigr) \,ds,\quad a^{\rho } \leq z\leq b^{\rho } $$
and
$$ \bar{v}(z)=\rho ^{-\alpha } \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} G(z,s) \psi \bigl(s ^{\frac{1}{\rho }},T^{-1}\bar{u},T^{-1}\bar{v}\bigr) \,ds,\quad a^{\rho } \leq z\leq b^{\rho }. $$
Further, (2.5) and (A1) yield
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \bar{u}(z) \bigr\vert \leq & \rho ^{-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a ^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \\ &{}\times \biggl[ \biggl( \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w_{11} \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{ \rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \bigl\Vert T^{-1}\bar{u} \bigr\Vert _{\infty }+ \biggl( \int _{a ^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w_{12} \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \bigl\Vert T^{-1}\bar{v} \bigr\Vert _{\infty } \biggr], \end{aligned}$$
for \(a^{\rho }\leq z\leq b^{\rho }\), i.e.,
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert u \bigl(z^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \bigr\vert \leq & \rho ^{- \alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}{ \alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \\ &{}\times \biggl[ \biggl( \int _{a^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w_{11} \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{ \rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \bigl\Vert T^{-1}\bar{u} \bigr\Vert _{\infty }+ \biggl( \int _{a ^{\rho }}^{b^{\rho }} w_{12} \bigl(s^{\frac{1}{\rho }} \bigr) \,ds \biggr) \bigl\Vert T^{-1}\bar{v} \bigr\Vert _{\infty } \biggr], \end{aligned}$$
for \(a^{\rho }\leq z\leq b^{\rho }\), which implies that
$$ \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }\leq A_{11} \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }+A_{12} \Vert v \Vert _{\infty }, $$
(4.2)
where
$$ A_{1j}=\rho ^{1-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \int _{a}^{b} w_{1j}(t) t ^{\rho -1} \,dt,\quad j=1,2. $$
Using (A2) and a similar argument as above, we get
$$ \Vert v \Vert _{\infty }\leq A_{21} \Vert u \Vert _{\infty }+A_{22} \Vert v \Vert _{\infty }, $$
(4.3)
where
$$ A_{2j}=\rho ^{1-\alpha } \frac{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{ \alpha -1}}{\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )} \int _{a}^{b} w_{2j}(t) t ^{\rho -1} \,dt,\quad j=1,2. $$
Further, combining (4.2) with (4.3), we obtain
$$ 0_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}\preceq _{2} \vec{x}\preceq _{2} A \vec{x}, $$
where \(A=(A_{ij})_{1\leq i,j\leq 2} \in \mathcal{M}_{2}(\mathbb{R} _{+})\) and x = ( u v ) Open image in new window. Since \((u,v)\) is a nontrivial solution to (1.2), we have \(\vec{x}\neq 0_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}\). Therefore, by Lemma 2.5, we have
$$ r(A)\geq 1. $$
(4.4)
Let \(P_{A}\) be the characteristic polynomial of the matrix A, i.e.,
$$ P_{A}(\lambda )=\lambda ^{2}-\operatorname{tr}(A)\lambda +\det (A), \quad \lambda \in \mathbb{C}, $$
where \(\operatorname{tr}(A)\) is the trace of A and \(\det (A)\) is its determinant. Then the discriminant of \(P_{A}\) is given by
$$ \Delta (P_{A})= (A_{11}-A_{22} )^{2} +4 A_{21}A_{12}. $$
Note that since \(A \in \mathcal{M}_{2}(\mathbb{R}_{+})\), we have \(\Delta (P_{A})\geq 0\). Therefore, the eigenvalues of the matrix A are given by
$$ \lambda _{1}(A)=\frac{A_{11}+A_{22}+\sqrt{ (A_{11}-A_{22} ) ^{2} +4 A_{21}A_{12}}}{2} $$
and
$$ \lambda _{2}(A)=\frac{A_{11}+A_{22}-\sqrt{ (A_{11}-A_{22} ) ^{2} +4 A_{21}A_{12}}}{2}. $$
Observe that \(\lambda _{1}(A)\geq \lambda _{2}(A)\). We discuss two cases.

Case 1. \(A_{11}A_{22}\geq A_{21}A_{12}\).

In this case, we have \(\lambda _{2}(A)\geq 0\), which yields
$$ r(A)=\lambda _{1}(A). $$

Case 2. \(A_{11}A_{22}< A_{21}A_{12}\).

In this case, we have
$$ \lambda _{1}(A)\geq \bigl\vert \lambda _{2}(A) \bigr\vert =\frac{\sqrt{ (A_{11}-A_{22} ) ^{2} +4 A_{21}A_{12}}-A_{11}-A_{22}}{2}, $$
which implies that
$$ r(A)=\lambda _{1}(A). $$
Therefore, we proved that in both cases, we have
$$ r(A)=\frac{A_{11}+A_{22}+\sqrt{ (A_{11}-A_{22} )^{2} +4 A _{21}A_{12}}}{2}. $$
(4.5)
Finally, combining (4.4) with (4.5), (4.1) follows. □

Further, we list some special cases following from Theorem 4.1.

Let us consider the system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + \mu (t) u(t)+ \nu (t)v(t) =0,\quad a< t< b, \\ ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(t) + \chi (t) u(t)+ \mu (t) v(t),\quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(4.6)
where \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), \(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\) and \(\mu ,\nu ,\chi \in C([a,b])\). Observe that (4.6) is a special case of (1.2) with
$$ \varphi (t,g,h)=\mu (t) g(t)+\nu (t) h(t),\quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b] \times C \bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr) $$
and
$$ \psi (t,g,h)=\chi (t) g(t)+\mu (t) h(t),\quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b]\times C \bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr). $$
Note that the function φ satisfies (A1) with
$$ w_{11}= \vert \mu \vert \quad \text{and}\quad w_{12}= \vert \nu \vert . $$
Moreover, the function ψ satisfies (A2) with
$$ w_{21}= \vert \chi \vert \quad \text{and}\quad w_{22}=w_{11}. $$
Hence, using Theorem 4.1, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 4.1

Let\((u,v)\in C^{2}([a,b])\times C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (4.6). Then
$$ \sqrt{ \biggl( \int _{a}^{b} \bigl\vert \chi (t) \bigr\vert t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr) \biggl( \int _{a}^{b} \bigl\vert \nu (t) \bigr\vert (t)t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr)} + \int _{a}^{b} \bigl\vert \mu (t) \bigr\vert t ^{\rho -1} \,dt\geq \frac{\rho ^{\alpha -1}\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma ( \alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{\rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}. $$
Let us consider the system
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }u )(t) + \mu (t) u(t)+ \nu (t)v(t) =0,\quad a< t< b, \\ ({}_{*}^{\rho }D_{a^{+}}^{\alpha }v )(t) + \chi (t) v(t), \quad a< t< b, \\ u(a)=u(b)=v(a)=v(b)=0, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(4.7)
where \(a,b\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< a< b\), \(\rho >0\), \(1<\alpha <2\) and \(\mu ,\nu ,\chi \in C([a,b])\). Observe that (4.7) is a special case of (1.2) with
$$ \varphi (t,g,h)=\mu (t) g(t)+\nu (t) h(t),\quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b] \times C \bigl([a,b]\bigr)\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr) $$
and
$$ \psi (t,g,h)=\chi (t) h(t),\quad (t,g,h)\in [a,b]\times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr) \times C\bigl([a,b]\bigr). $$
Note that the function φ satisfies (A1) with
$$ w_{11}= \vert \mu \vert \quad \text{and}\quad w_{12}= \vert \nu \vert . $$
Moreover, the function ψ satisfies (A2) with
$$ w_{21}\equiv 0 \quad \text{and}\quad w_{22}= \vert \chi \vert . $$
Hence, using Theorem 4.1, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 4.2

Let\((u,v)\in C^{2}([a,b])\times C^{2}([a,b])\)be a nontrivial solution to (4.7). Then
$$ \biggl\vert \int _{a}^{b} \bigl( \bigl\vert \mu (t) \bigr\vert - \bigl\vert \chi (t) \bigr\vert \bigr)t^{\rho -1} \,dt \biggr\vert + \int _{a}^{b} \bigl( \bigl\vert \mu (t) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert \chi (t) \bigr\vert \bigr)t^{\rho -1} \,dt\geq \frac{2 \rho ^{\alpha -1}\alpha ^{\alpha }\varGamma (\alpha )}{[(\alpha -1)(b^{ \rho }-a^{\rho })]^{\alpha -1}}. $$

5 Conclusions

In this contribution, nonlinear fractional differential equations involving Caputo-type fractional derivatives have been considered. Necessary conditions for the existence of nontrivial solutions to the considered problems have been obtained. We have discussed both cases: the case of an equation and the case of a coupled system. For each case, a Lyapunov-type inequality has been established. We expect that the proposed approaches and techniques used in this paper can be adapted to study other fractional boundary value problems.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The second author extends his appreciation to Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) at King Saud University (Saudi Arabia). The third author acknowledges the support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671339).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally in this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by DSFP at King Saud University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, R.P., Jleli, M., Samet, B.: On de la Vallée Poussin-type inequalities in higher dimension and applications. Appl. Math. Lett. 86, 264–269 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borg, G.: On a Liapunoff criterion of stability. Am. J. Math. 71, 67–70 (1949) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabrera, I., Lopez, B., Sadarangani, K.: Lyapunov type inequalities for a fractional two-point boundary value problem. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 3409–3414 (2017) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cañada, A., Villegas, S.: Lyapunov inequalities for Neumann boundary conditions at higher eigenvalues. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 12, 163–178 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahiya, R.S., Singh, B.: A Liapunov inequality and nonoscillation theorem for a second order nonlinear differential-difference equations. J. Math. Phys. Sci. 7, 163–170 (1973) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Das, A.M., Vatsala, A.S.: Green function for nn boundary value problem and an analogue of Hartman’s result. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 51, 670–677 (1975) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dhar, S., Kong, Q., McCabe, M.: Fractional boundary value problems and Lyapunov-type inequalities with fractional integral boundary conditions. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2016, 43 (2016) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhar, S., Kong, Q.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for α-th order fractional differential equations with \(2<\alpha \leq 3\) and fractional boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2017, 203, 1–15 (2017) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dym, H.: Linear Algebra in Action. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 78. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2007) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eliason, S.B.: A Liapunov inequality for a certain second order nonlinear differential equation. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 461–466 (1970) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferreira, R.A.C.: A Lyapunov-type inequality for a fractional boundary value problem. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 16(4), 978–984 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferreira, R.A.C.: On a Lyapunov-type inequality and the zeros of a certain Mittag-Leffler function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 412, 1058–1063 (2014) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jleli, M., Kirane, M., Samet, B.: On Lyapunov-type inequalities for a certain class of partial differential equations. Appl. Anal. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2018.1484909 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jleli, M., Kirane, M., Samet, B.: Hartman-Wintner-type inequality for a fractional boundary value problem via a fractional derivative with respect to another function. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2017, 5123240 (2017) (8 pages) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jleli, M., Nieto, J., Samet, B.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for a higher order fractional differential equation with fractional integral boundary conditions. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2017, 16 (2017) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jleli, M., Ragoub, L., Samet, B.: A Lyapunov-type inequality for a fractional differential equation under a Robin boundary condition. J. Funct. Spaces 2015, 468536 (2015) (5 pages) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jleli, M., Samet, B.: Lyapunov type inequalities for a fractional differential equation with mixed boundary value problems. Math. Inequal. Appl. 18, 443–451 (2015) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jleli, M., Samet, B.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for fractional boundary-value problems. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2015, 88 1–11 (2015) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jleli, M., Samet, B.: Existence of positive solutions to a coupled system of fractional differential equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 38, 1014–1031 (2015) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katugampola, U.N.: New approach to a generalized fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(3), 860–865 (2011) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katugampola, U.N.: A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 6(4), 1–15 (2014) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kwong, M.K.: On Lyapunov’s inequality for disfocality. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 83, 486–494 (1981) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lyapunov, A.M.: Problème geńeŕal de la stabilité du mouvement. Ann. Fac. Sci. Univ. Toulouse Sci. Math. Sci. Phys. 2, 203–407 (1907) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Napoli, P.L., Pinasco, J.P.: Estimates for eigenvalues of quasilinear elliptic systems. J. Differ. Equ. 227, 102–115 (2006) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oliveira, D.S., de Oliveira, E.C.: On a Caputo-type fractional derivative. Adv. Pure Appl. Math. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1515/apam-2017-0068 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Regan, D., Samet, B.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for a class of fractional differential equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 247 (10 pages) (2015) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rong, J., Bai, C.Z.: Lyapunov-type inequality for a fractional differential equations with fractional boundary value problems. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2015, 82 (10 pages) (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pachpatte, B.G.: On Liapunov-type inequalities for certain higher order differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 195, 527–536 (1995) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parhi, N., Panigrahi, S.: Liapunov-type inequality for higher order differential equations. Math. Slovaca 52(1), 31–46 (2002) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reid, W.T.: Interrelations between a trace formula and Liapunov inequalities. J. Differ. Equ. 23, 448–458 (1977) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Samko, S.G., Kilbas, A.A., Marichev, O.I.: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Gordon & Breach, Yverdon (1993) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wintner, A.: On the nonexistence of conjugate points. Am. J. Math. 73, 368–380 (1951) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang, X.: On Liapunov-type inequality for certain higher-order differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 134, 307–317 (2003) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, M., Li, W.: A Lyapunov-type stability criterion using \(L^{\alpha }\) norms. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 130, 3325–3333 (2002) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Faculty of Information TechnologyMacau University of Science and TechnologyMacauChina
  3. 3.Faculty of Mathematics and Computational ScienceXiangtan UniversityXiangtanChina

Personalised recommendations