Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 12:135 | Cite as

Magnitude and correlates of cognitive impairment among major depressive disorder patients in Addis Ababa: institution based cross-sectional study

  • Abebe Ambaw
  • Getachew Tesfaw DesalegnEmail author
Open Access
Research note
  • 122 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Cognitive impairments are now widely recognized and emerging as an important therapeutic target in a patient with a major depressive disorder (MDD). It associated with a more deteriorating course of illness among MDD patients. Therefore, understanding the level of cognitive impairment and associated factors is crucial to provide optimal care for MDD patients.

Result

The proportion of cognitive impairment among MDD patients was found to be 54.4% (95%, CI (49.6, 59.3). Factors significantly associated with having cognitive impairment were age adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.00, 95%, confidence interval (CI): (1.49, 6.03), educational status, (AOR = 5.36, 95% CI 2.16, 13.26), employment status (AOR = 3.63, 95 CI 1.99, 6.62), duration of the illness (AOR = 3.16, 95% CI 1.31, 7.64), having co-morbid psychiatric illnesses (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.26, 3.71), and illness relapse (AOR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.54, 5.73).

Keywords

Cognitive impairment Major depressive disorder Mini Mental Status Examination 

Abbreviations

AD

antidepressant

AMSH

Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital

CI

cognitive impairment

DSM

Diagnostic Statistical Manual of four and five

MDD

major depressive disorders

UOG

University of Gondar

WHO

World Health Organization

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental illnesses with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 16.6%. More than 350 million people estimated to have MDDs globally [1].

The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Burden of Disease study ranked that depression is the most serious disorder in the world for total disability-adjusted years among people in the middle years of life [2]. Major depressive disorders can negatively affect cognitive function and cognitive loss after the onset of illness [3, 4].

Cognitive impairment (CI) is when a person has trouble concentrating, remembering, learning new things, or making decision that affect every day life [5]. And different factors could play a role in the development of CI secondary to depression. These include length of the depression, being female, the number of hospitalizations, education, duration of illness, and genetic [6, 7, 8].

Cognitive dysfunction is a core component of MDD [9, 10, 11, 12]. But its prevalence is high inpatient setting than outpatient [13]. Almost half of the MDD patients have been affected by CI [14].

In MDD, the most commonly impaired cognitive domains are attention, memory, executive function, and it had been estimated to occur in about two-thirds of depressed patients [15, 16]. Executive and attention dysfunctions typical features in MDD patients [17]. And its functional impairment has been started from the first episode to recurrent episode [7, 17, 18]. Which in turn difficulty in concentration, and impaired decision making during actual patients’ examination [17, 19].

Although it was first thought that CI in MDD was state-related, there was increasing evidence suggesting that its abnormalities persist beyond depressive episode [20]. Different studies showed that adults experiencing their first major depressive episode performed were significantly high CI such as attention, visual memory, verbal fluency, and cognitive flexibility, with small to moderate effect sizes [21, 22]. Between one-third and one-half of remitted depressed patients were thought to be affected by cognitive dysfunction [16]. It is a common feature of MDD, contributing to the serious decline in patients’ quality of life difficult to concentrate, to make decisions, and “forget everything” [5, 23].

Persistent cognitive dysfunction influences therapeutic compliance, coping capacities, and therapeutic relationship [24]. Recurrent depression had been worse cognitive performance and executive function [25, 26]. Cognitive dysfunction in MDD is a relevant contributing factor inpatient clinical and functional outcomes [27]. The management of CI remains an uncover need in the treatment of MDD [28]. And it is associated with MDD. Therefore, it is becoming a key target of treatment in its own right and future studies [29].

Although this area of research is still emerging, it is important to consider these problem as possible treatment targets and growing evidence of significant impairment in cognitive functioning in MDD [30]. The emphasis on MDD collectively has left a gap in the research [31].

However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no published study done on CI and associated factors among MDD in Africa and Ethiopia. This study is therefore aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of CI among MDD patients at AMSH with a view of informing the development of the appropriate interventions.

Main text

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at AMSH from May to July 2017, Addis Ababa Ethiopia. It is the only mental health hospital in Ethiopia and has a total of 300 beds. Currently, 1746 MDD patients are monthly on follow up.

All patients with MDD who were on follow up at AMSH at the outpatient department who were available during data collection period. Those MDD patients critically ill were excluded from the study. Sample size was calculated by using the single population proportion formula involving the using Epi-info version 7 with a 95% CI, 5% margin of error and the total of 421 MDD patients were recruited randomly by using systematic sampling technique.

Data were collected using a pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire, which contains CI as the dependent variable and other several explanatory variables.

The Mini-Mental Status Examination was used to measure CI among MDD patients and young adults whose age range from 18 to 85 years [32, 33].

Cognitive impairment was measured by using by MMSE test with the cutoff points ≤ had CI [34]. Social support was assessed by using Oslo 3-item social support scale and the sum score scale ranges from 3 to 14 with three broad categories: “Poor support” 3–8, “moderate support” 9–11 and “strong support” 12–14, respectively [35].

Data were entered to Ep-data software after checking completeness and imported SPSS version 21 for analysis. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to see the association of each independent variable with the outcome variable. Those variables having a p-value less than 0.2 were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model to identify the effect of each independent variable with the outcome variable. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant and AOR with 95% CI was calculated to determine association. We followed the methods of the previous study was done in Ethiopia [36].

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

From a total of 421 participants recruited for this study 395 completed the survey making a response rate 93.3%. The mean age of the participants was 37.2 (± 10.72) years. About half of respondents (50.4%) were females and 192 (48.6%) were married. Around one-third (28.9%) attended primary school, Orthodox religion followers accounted for 48.4% and 240 (60.8%) were currently working (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of MDD patients by demographic factors among MDD patients at AMSH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017 (n = 395)

Variable

Frequency

Percent

Sex

 Male

196

49.6

 Female

199

50.4

Age

 18–25

102

25.8

 26–40

150

38.0

 41–59

143

36.2

Religions

 Orthodox

191

48.4

 Muslim

143

36.2

 Othersa

61

15.4

Marital status

 Single

163

41.3

 Married

192

48.6

Othersb

40

10.1

Educational status

 Unable to read and write

94

23.8

 Primary

114

28.9

 Secondary

108

27.3

 Tertiary

79

20

Occupational status

 Currently working

240

60.8

 Not working

155

39.2

aProtestant, catholic and adventist

bWidowed, separated and divorced

Clinical and psychosocial characteristics

Among the participants, 274 (69.4%) developed MDD after the age of 25 years and three-forth 75.2% had been with the illness for more than 10 years. About half (50%) of the respondents had co-morbid psychiatric disorders and 139 (35.2%) of them had been hospitalized for MDDs (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of clinical and psychosocial factors among MDD patients at AMSH Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017 (n = 395)

Variable

Frequency

Percent

Co-morbidity

 Yes

198

50.1

No

197

49.9

Drug

 Antidepressant

217

54.9

 Antidepressant, antipsychotic and others

178

45.1

Frequency of medication

 One time per day

226

57.2

 Two times per day and three times per day

169

42.8

Duration of the illness (years)

 < 5

43

10.9

 5–10

55

13.9

 > 10

297

75.7

First illness (in the year)

 < 25

121

30.6

 > 25

274

69.4

Treatment duration (years)

 < 6

242

61.3

 > 6

153

38.7

Relapse

 Yes

172

43.5

 No

223

56.5

Previous hospitalization

 Yes

139

35.2

 No

256

64.8

Social support

 Strong

51

12.9

 Moderate

166

42.0

 Poor

178

45.1

Substance-related factors

Regarding substance use 31.9% and 28.9% of the participants were lifetime and currently substance users (Additional file 1).

Prevalence of cognitive impairment

This study showed that the prevalence of CI among study participants was found to be 54.4% with 95% CI (49.6, 59.3).

Factors associated with cognitive impairment

Among variables, sex, age, education, and occupational status, having co-morbid psychiatric illnesses, duration of treatment, previous hospitalization, relapse and duration of the illness were found to have a p-value less than 0.2 from bi-variable logistic regression and were considered for the multivariable logistic regression model.

A multivariate analysis suggest that, participants who did not read and write were 5.4 times more likely to have CI as compared to patients who achieved college and above level of education (95% CI 2.16, 13.26). Respondents who were not working 3.63 times more likely to develop CI than who were working (95% CI: 1.99, 6.62).

Participants whose age ranges between 41 and 59 years were increased risk of CI by three times (95% CI 1.49, 6.03) as compared to whose age ranges between 18 and 25 years. Furthermore, co-morbid psychiatric disorders two times increased CI as compared to no psychiatry co-morbid illnesses (95% CI 1.26–3.59). Similarly, respondents who had longer duration of treatment 3.16 times more likely to have CI than who had short duration of treatments (95% CI 1.31–7.64). Finally, having relapse were increased CI by 3.13 times (95%, CI (1.57–6.25) as compared to who did not have relapse history. On the other hand, sex, previous hospitalization and treatment duration had not associated with cognitive impairment (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors associated with cognitive impairment among MDD patients at AMSH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 395)

Variables

Categories

Cognitive impairment

COR, CI (95%)

AOR, CI (95%)

No

Yes

Sex

Male

104

92

1

1

Female

76

123

1.83 (1.23, 2.73)

1.65 (0.93, 2.93)

Age

18–25

67

35

1

1

26–40

74

76

1.96 (1.17, 3.30)

1.43 (0.73, 2.79)

41–59

39

104

5.11 (3.87, 12.57)

3:00 (1.49, 6.03)***

Presence of occupation

Yes

142

98

1

1

No

38

117

4.46 (2.85, 6.98)

3.13 (1.76, 5.59)***

Education

Can’t read and write

14

80

7.56 (3.68, 15.56)

5.92 (2.45, 14.28)***

1–8 grade

51

63

1.64 (0.92, 2.92)

1.49 (0.72, 3.13)

9–12 grade

70

38

0.72 (0.39, 1.30)

0.68 (0.34, 1.48)

Diploma and above

45

34

1

1

Co-morbidity

Yes

71

127

2.22 (1.48, 3.32)

2.16 (1.26, 3.71)*

No

109

88

1

1

Treatment duration (years)

< 6

128

114

1

1

< 6

52

101

2.18 (1.43, 3.32)

1.53 (0.69, 3.39)

Relapse history

Yes

56

116

2.59 (1.72, 3.93)

2.97 (1.54, 5.73)**

No

124

99

1

1

Duration of illness (years)

< 5

28

15

1

1

5–10

45

10

0.42 (0.16, 1.05)

0.48 (0.15, 1.54)

< 10

107

190

3.32 (1.69, 6.48)

3.16 (1.31, 7.64)**

Previous hospitalization

Yes

48

104

2.58 (1.68, 3.94)

1.28 (0.66, 2.49)

No

132

111

1

1

* p-value significant at p < 0.05, ** p-value is significant at p < 0.01, *** p-value is significant at p < 0.001 and p-value from Hosmer and Lemeshow test was 0.745

Discussion

The prevalence of a current study is consistent with a study reported a meta-analysis in the USA 58% to acutely depressed and remitted patients [37]. Half of the Asian patients with MDD had all domains of cognitive dysfunction by assessing perceived deficit questionnaire-depression [14].

On the other hand, the prevalence of the current study is lower than studies done in British 83% [38] and USA 76.6% [24]. The variation of the prevalence might be due to used different study design, sample size difference, socio-cultural differences between those countries and Ethiopia, and measurement tools variation. In the USA cohort study design was used by assessing the psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaires and in British was used systematic review study.

In addition to the above variation, the study time, at which the current data was collected, could be considered as a source of variation.

However, the current study finding was higher than a study carried out in Canada, in which the prevalence were reported to be 44% [39] and China 12.6% [40]. The possible reason could be different in measurement tools, study design, and age. In Canada, cognitive impairment was conducted by using prospective study design and it was screened by using Composite International Diagnostic Interview tool for 3-year residual symptoms and in China elderly people age greater than sixty. Another variation might be due to a year of study and the socio-cultural difference might account for the difference.

Regarding associated factors, the risk of CI for patients who did not read and write was increased by five times as compared to patients who achieved level of Education College and above. This is supported with other similar study conducted a meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode MDD were lower level of educational status the risk of severe deficits in cognitive functioning [21] and having a low level of education among elderly people of China [40].

Participants whose age late adulthood was three times exposed CI as compared to that of younger adults. It might be due to natural processing of age, they are vulnerable to medical and psychiatric co-morbidity and they took treatment for a longer period of time might contribute to cognitive impairment. Which was supported other studies done in Asian elderly people who had an age range between 21 and 40 years was highly cognitive impairment than 41–60 years old and in Egypt age one of the factors for cognitive dysfunction [14, 19].

Respondents who were not working were 3.63 times more likely to develop CI than those who were working which was consistent with studies conducted among Canada and British MDD patients. One-quarter the impact of MDD on work loss and low work performance was directly attributable to self-reported cognitive complaints and all depressed patients had the negative consequence of their work functioning [38, 41].

Participants having history of relapse were three times risk of to develop CI as compared to participants who did not have relapse, this was supported by studies were done with CI and residual symptoms among MDD patients were associated with higher rates of relapse and recurrence due to CI [26, 39, 42, 43, 44]. The recurrent episode or relapse of depression leads to more impaired their CI than a single episode of depressed patients [26] and in France multiple episodes of depression leads cognitive dysfunction [17].

Having co-morbid illness had two times more likely to develop CI as compared with those who had not co-morbidity among participants who had MDD with a psychotic feature. This is consistent with a study conducted in Denmark. The presence of co-morbid disorders had been shown to be a predictor of poor cognitive performance in depression which leads to cognitive dysfunction among depressed patients [45]. Participants who had a longer duration of illness 3.2 times to experienced CI as compared to patients who had with short duration illness. This is also supported by a study conducted in the University of Texas and Columbia to treatment resistance contributes to longer episodes [46] and another study in Chicago longer duration of illness was worsen the cognitive dysfunction [8].

Conclusion

This study revealed that the prevalence of CI among major depressive disorder patients was high. Having relapses, being in late adulthood, inability to read and write, not currently working, long-term duration of illness and having co-morbid psychiatric illness were significantly associated with CI. Further research on risk factors for CI should be conducted to strengthen and broaden these findings.

Limitation

This is a cross-sectional study; it is difficult to determine the temporal relationship between explanatory and outcome variables. This finding likely only hints at the complex interactions between CI and explanatory variables. Another most important limitation of this study is the MMSE scale was not validated in Ethiopia although it is widely used in USA and European countries as a screening tool of CI for geriatric patients but culture, education and age alterations in low income country like Ethiopia was considered.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

AA conceived the study and was involved in the study design, reviewed the article, analysis, report writing and drafted the manuscript and GT were involved in the study design, analysis and drafted the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia for funding the study. The authors appreciate the respective study institutions and the study participants for their cooperation in providing the necessary information.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRR) of the University of Gondar and Amanuel Mental Specialized hospital. Individuals who agreed to participate gave written consent. For those who were not literate, the independent witness was invited to sign to indicate that the information had been read out correctly. Non-literate participants then gave a thumbprint to indicate consent. Confidentiality was maintained by an anonymous questionnaire. All participants were given an information sheet and were only included in the study after providing informed consent. Those who had to severe cognitive impairment with their permission were referred to the geriatric clinic and clinical psychologist for better intervention and treatment.

Funding

The study was funded by the University of Gondar and the funders only involved by giving the funding for the design of a study, data collection, analysis and interpretation only.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13104_2019_4184_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Additional file 1. Distributions of substance-related factors among MDD patients at AMSH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017 (n = 395).

References

  1. 1.
    Kessler RC, Akiskal HS, Ames M, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, et al. Prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of US workers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1561–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy-lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996;274(5288):740–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McBride AM, Abeles N. Depressive symptoms and cognitive performance in older adults. Clin Gerontol. 2000;21(2):27–47.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schatzberg AF. Major depression: causes or effects? Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(7):1077–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Psychiatric Publications. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Philadelphia: American Psychiatric Publications; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott R. The neuropsychological profile in unipolar depression. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2(11):447–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ngampramuan S, Tungtong P, Mukda S, Jariyavilas A, Sakulisariyaporn C. Evaluation of autonomic nervous system, saliva cortisol levels, and cognitive function in major depressive disorder patients. Depress Res Treat. 2018;2018:7343592.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7343592.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peters AT, Jacobs RH, Crane NA, Ryan KA, Weisenbach SL, Ajilore O, et al. Domain-specific impairment in cognitive control among remitted youth with a history of major depression. Early Intervent Psychiatry. 2017;11(5):383–92.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arts B, Jabben N, Krabbendam L, Van Os J. Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives. Psychol Med. 2008;38(6):771–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Austin M-P, Mitchell P, Goodwin GM. Cognitive deficits in depression: possible implications for functional neuropathology. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178(3):200–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bora E, Yücel M, Pantelis C, Berk M. Meta-analytic review of neurocognition in bipolar II disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;123(3):165–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinrichs RW, Zakzanis KK. Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology. 1998;12(3):426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Douglas KM, Gallagher P, Robinson LJ, Carter JD, McIntosh VV, Frampton CM, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in major depression and bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorders. 2018;20(3):260–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manit S, Ming MY, Kuang YY, Herng-Nieng C, Constantine D, Zainal NZ, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in Asian patients with depression (COG DAD): a cross-sectional study. Clin Pract Epidemiol Mental Health. 2017;13:185–99.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brüne M, Bullmore ET, Carter CS, Clayton NS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2012;11(2):141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abas MA, Sahakian BJ, Levy R. Neuropsychological deficits and CT scan changes in elderly depressives. Psychol Med. 1990;20(3):507–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Darcet F, Gardier A, Gaillard R, David D, Guilloux J-P. Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder. A translational review in animal models of the disease. Pharmaceuticals. 2016;9(1):9.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen C, Jiang W-H, Wang W, Ma X-C, Li Y, Wu J, et al. Impaired visual, working, and verbal memory in first-episode, drug-naive patients with major depressive disorder in a Chinese population. PloS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0196023.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aal MKA, Molokhia TK, El Kholy OA, Sheshtawy HA. Cognitive dysfunction profile in a sample of Egyptian patients experiencing major depressive disorder. Egypt J Psychiatry. 2018;39(2):66.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hasselbalch BJ, Knorr U, Kessing LV. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1–3):20–31.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee RS, Hermens DF, Porter MA, Redoblado-Hodge MA. A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2012;140(2):113–24.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McIntyre RS, Cha DS, Soczynska JK, Woldeyohannes HO, Gallaugher LA, Kudlow P, et al. Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30(6):515–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gonda X, Pompili M, Serafini G, Carvalho AF, Rihmer Z, Dome P. The role of cognitive dysfunction in the symptoms and remission from depression. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015;14(1):27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaynes BN, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani G, Spencer DC, et al. Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(2):126–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grant MM, Thase ME, Sweeney JA. Cognitive disturbance in outpatient depressed younger adults: evidence of modest impairment. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(1):35–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kessing LV. Cognitive impairment in the euthymic phase of affective disorder. Psychol Med. 1998;28(5):1027–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vita A, Mussoni C, Deste G, Ferlenghi G, Turrina C, Valsecchi P. Psychopharmacological treatment of cognitive deficits in Schizophrenia and mood disorders. J Psychopathol. 2018;24:62–72.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bortolato B, Miskowiak KW, Köhler CA, Maes M, Fernandes BS, Berk M, et al. Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? BMC Med. 2016;14(1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MacQueen GM, Memedovich KA. Cognitive dysfunction in major depression and bipolar disorder: assessment and treatment options. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;71(1):18–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Russo M, Mahon K, Burdick KE. Measuring cognitive function in MDD: emerging assessment tools. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(4):262–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG, Benedict KB. Neurocognition in depression: patients on and off medication versus healthy comparison subjects. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;18(2):217–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alpert JE, Uebelacker LA, McLean NE, Abraham M, Rosenbaum JF, Fava M. The Mini-Mental State Examination among adult outpatients with major depressive disorder. Psychother Psychosom. 1995;63(3–4):207–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burt DB, Zembar MJ, Niederehe G. Depression and memory impairment: a meta-analysis of the association, its pattern, and specificity. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(2):285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baiyewu O, Bella AF, Jegede RO. The effect of demographic and health variables on a modified form of mini-mental state examination scores in nigerian elderly community residents. Int J Geriat Psychiatry. 1993;8(6):503–10.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bøen H. Characteristics of senior centre users—and the impact of a group programme on social support and late-life depression. Norsk epidemiologi. 2012;22(2):261–69.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tesfaw G, Ayano G, Awoke T, Assefa D, Birhanu Z, Miheretie G, et al. Prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety among patients with HIV on-follow up at Alert Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):368.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gualtieri CT, Morgan DW. The frequency of cognitive impairment in patients with anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder: an unaccounted source of variance in clinical trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(7):1122–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Evans VC, Chan SS, Iverson GL, Bond DJ, Yatham LN, Lam RW. Systematic review of neurocognition and occupational functioning in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatry. 2013;3(1):97.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Conradi H, Ormel J, De Jonge P. Presence of individual (residual) symptoms during depressive episodes and periods of remission: a 3-year prospective study. Psychol Med. 2011;41(6):1165–74.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Giri M, Chen T, Yu W, Lü Y. Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment and depression among elderly people in the world’s fastest growing city, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1091–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McClintock SM, Husain MM, Greer TL, Cullum CM. Association between depression severity and neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder: a review and synthesis. Neuropsychology. 2010;24(1):9–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nierenberg A, Husain M, Trivedi M, Fava M, Warden D, Wisniewski S, et al. Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with citalopram and risk of relapse: a STAR* D report. Psychol Med. 2010;40(1):41–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Majer M, Ising M, Künzel H, Binder E, Holsboer F, Modell S, et al. Impaired divided attention predicts delayed response and risk to relapse in subjects with depressive disorders. Psychol Med. 2004;34(8):1453–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fossati P, Ergis A, Allilaire J. Executive functioning in unipolar depression: a review. L’encéphale. 2002;28(2):97–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baune BT, McAfoose J, Leach G, Quirk F, Mitchell D. Impact of psychiatric and medical comorbidity on cognitive function in depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;63(3):392–400.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gibel A, Ritsner MS. Neurocognitive effects of ziprasidone and related factors in patients with chronic schizophrenia undergoing usual care: a 12-month, open-label, flexible-dose, naturalistic observational trial. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008;31(4):204–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jugol Referral HospitalHarraEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of GondarGondarEthiopia

Personalised recommendations