Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 12:130 | Cite as

Association between the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus and the presence of superantigen genes in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

  • Hamed Tahmasebi
  • Sanaz Dehbashi
  • Mohammad Reza ArabestaniEmail author
Open Access
Research note
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cause to a variety of hard to cure infections. MRSA isolates also, produce an arsenal of virulence factors contribute to severe infections. The aim of this study was to find out the relationship between agr locus and presence of S. aureus superantigens (SAgs).

Results

Clinical isolates in two groups from two different states of Iran were collected. Antibiotic resistance patterns, agr typing, and virulence factor genes prevalence were identified and relationship between them was analyzed using SPSS software version16. Most of the samples were collected from wound 39 isolates in Group 1 and 61 isolates in Group 2. Frequency of MRSA strains was 38.1% in Group 1 and 52.1% in Group 2. Also, the most common resistance among both groups was to penicillin. agr positive isolates were detected in 132 isolates of Group 1 and 104 isolates of Group 2. In Conclusion, a significant relationship between the SAgs frequency and agr locus in both groups has been indicated. The production of superantigens in S. aureus plays an important role in the classification of agr locus, and this locus can affect differently in methicillin-resistant strains.

Keywords

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Superantigens Virulence factors agr locus 

Abbreviations

agr

accessory gene regulator

MRSA

methicillin resistant S. aureus

SAgs

superantigens

PBP2A

penicillin binding protein

SCCmec

the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette

VISA

vancomycin intermediate-level resistant

VRSA

vancomycin resistant isolates

PVL

Panton-Valentine leukocidin

TSST-1

toxic shock syndrome toxin-1

MGEs

mobile generic elements

CLSI

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute

Introduction

Inappropriate use of antibiotics to treat S. aureus infections have led to the development of antibiotic resistant strains. The first cases of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were identified in the 1960s, shortly after its introduction into clinical practice [1, 2]. Methicillin resistance is conferred by the mecA gene, which encodes a novel penicillin binding protein (PBP2A) [3, 4]. This protein has a reduced affinity for β-lactam antibiotics. The mecA gene is carried on a mobile genetic element known as the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec), which can be horizontally transferred between Staphylococcal strains [5].

Staphylococcus aureus encodes toxin and superantigens like hemolysins, enterotoxins, exotoxins, exfoloative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) and leukotoxins such as the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). Different S. aureus strains encode different toxins. Exfoliative toxins, TSST-1 and PVL are presented only in some clones [6]. Reduced toxicity can hide the bacteria from the immune system, therefore, facilitate more stable and successful colonization in the host [7]. However, there are a number of undescribed genes in the MRSA strains, which encode virulence factors associated with infections in animals and human. Global regulators such as the accessory gene regulator (agr) system, Staphylococcal accessory regulator (Sar) and S. aureus exoprotein expression (Sae), have been well characterized which could help bacteria to adapt to a hostile environment [8, 9].

The production of S. aureus virulence factors is directly related to methicillin resistance. The mecA gene indirectly activates Autoinducer peptides (AIPs), which play an important role in the production of some regulatory factors, biofilms and quorum-sensing (QS) [9]. Beceiro et al. state that methicillin resistance induces cell wall alterations that affect the agr quorum-sensing system of the bacteria and consequently reduced virulence in a murine model of sepsis [9, 10].

In this research, MRSA and non-MRSA strains were examined with the aim of investigating the relationship between agr regulatory system and virulence factors.

Main text

Methods

Isolation and identification of S. aureus

This cross-sectional study was designed to measure the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients and healthcare workers (three hospitals, four clinical laboratories, and two healthcare centers) in Hamadan (Group 1) and Sistan and Baluchistan (Group 2) during July 2015 and August 2016. A multistage sampling method was used to select areas with different climate. Based on the distribution patterns of antibiotic resistance and different characteristics of the 28 states, the two states with the most differences in climate were selected. Sampling was done by considering the temperature variation index in different seasons and analyzing this index. Clinical specimens were inoculated on sheep blood agar (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and mannitol salt agar (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubated at 35–37 °C for 18 to 24 h aerobically. Biochemical tests were implicated to confirm the suspected isolates [11].

Detection of MRSA and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility profile of each isolate

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2017 on Muller Hinton agar (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany). The following drugs were used to determine the antibiotic susceptibility: penicillin (10 U), tetracycline (30 μg), clindamycin (30 μg), gentamicin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), rifampin (5 μg), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (10 μg) and linezolid (30 μg). All antibiotic disks were obtained from MAST ® Company, U K. Methicillin susceptibility was determined using the cefoxitin E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) and oxacillin E-test (AB BIODISK, Sweden). S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as negative control and S. aureus ATCC43300 was used as positive control.

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted by Cinnaclon DNA extraction kit (Cinnaclon, Iran) based on manufacturer’s instruction. DNA was yielded and investigated by spectrophotometry using the Nanodrop (ThermoFishers, USA).

PCR for superantigen genes and screening for strains

The superantigen genes were amplified with specific primers listed by Schlievert and et al. [12] and Jarraud et al. [13] studies.

agr typing

Classification of agr system groups was based on the hyper variable domain of agr locus according to Soares et al. [14]. Duplex PCR was performed to type groups based on their product size.

Statistical analysis

Data were organized and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 16. The correlation between phenotypic antibiotic pattern and agr locus, phenotypic antibiotic pattern and superantigens genes, superantigens genes and agr locus, sources of samples and agr locus in S. aureus isolates was evaluated by the Chi-square test and T-test. Statistical significance was set as a p-value of ≤ 0.05.

Results

Prevalence of clinical isolates

Totally, 1009 clinical samples were collected from patients in Hamedan (Group 1) and Sistan and baluchistan (Group 2). 160 isolates were collected from Group 1 and 190 isolates were collected from Group 2. In Group 1, the most prevalent isolates were collected from blood 58 (36.25%). Also, in Group 2; most of the samples were isolated from wound 61 (31.10%) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

 Distribution of different samples between Group 1 and Group 2 Staphylococcus aureus

Antibiotic resistance profiles and MIC

In Group 1, the most prevalent resistance was detected to penicillin (129, 80.62%) and to chloramphenicol (97 isolates, 60.62%). In addition, according to the results of of E-test strips, 2 (1.2%) isolates intermediate-resistance to vancomycin ≥ 3 µ/ml, 59 (36.87%) isolates resistant to oxacillin ≥ 4 µ/ml and 61 isolates (38.12%) resistant to cefoxitin ≥ 8 µ/ml were identified. Also, 61 (38.12%) MRSA strains were isolated from the clinical and screening samples.

In Group 2, penicillin and ciprofloxacin indicated as the highest resistance, 88.94% (169) and 63.68% (121) isolates, respectively. Moreover, based on the results of E-test strips, 4 (2.1%) isolates showed intermediate-resistance to vancomycin ≥ 3 µ/ml, 98 (51.50%) isolates resistant to oxacillin ≥ 4 µ/ml and 99 isolates (52.10%) isolates resistant to cefoxitin ≥ 8 µ/ml were identified. Also, 99 (52.10%) MRSA strains were isolated from the clinical and screening samples.

In Group 1, most of the MRSA samples were isolated from blood 66.66% (26 isolates) and wound 55.17% [32]. Whereas 0% (0 isolates) and 16.66% [1] of MSSA strains were detected in aspiration and sputum respectively. In Group 2, the most prevalent MRSA isolates were detected in blood 72.13% (44) and wound 46.34% [19], whereas MSSA isolates were identified in aspiration 26.66% [4] and sputum 10% [9] respectively, Table 1.
Table 1

Antimicrobial resistance profiles of MRSA, MSSA, and S. aureus isolates

Antibiotics

Group1

Group2

S. aureus

MRSAa

(n = 61)

MSSAb

(n = 99)

MRSA

(n = 99)

MSSA

(n = 91)

Group 1

(n = 160)

Group 2

(n = 190)

Rc

Id

Se

R

I

S

R

I

S

R

I

S

R

I

S

R

I

S

Penicillin

61

0

0

68

0

31

99

0

0

70

0

21

129

0

31

169

0

21

Tetracycline

58

2

1

21

9

69

64

2

33

40

9

42

79

11

70

104

11

75

Clindamycin

49

4

8

35

9

55

69

4

26

28

2

61

84

13

63

97

6

87

Gentamicin

59

0

2

32

8

59

79

11

9

9

8

74

91

8

61

88

19

83

Ciprofloxacin

55

5

1

33

12

54

94

2

3

27

1

63

88

17

55

121

3

66

Erythromycin

47

3

11

22

9

71

58

6

35

50

0

41

50

9

82

108

6

76

Chloramphenicol

57

0

4

40

11

48

83

7

9

15

4

72

97

11

52

98

11

81

Linezolid

4

0

57

0

0

99

6

0

93

1

0

90

4

0

156

7

0

183

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

27

3

31

22

1

76

37

6

56

14

3

74

49

4

107

51

9

130

Rifampicin

7

0

54

4

0

95

8

0

91

1

0

90

11

0

149

9

0

181

MIC (µg/ml)

 Vancomycin

0

2

59

0

0

99

0

4

95

0

0

91

0

2

158

0

4

186

 Oxacillin

59

2

0

0

0

99

98

1

0

0

0

91

59

9

92

98

4

88

 Cefoxitin

61

0

0

0

0

99

99

0

0

0

0

91

61

11

88

99

5

86

Superantigens genes profiles

Out of 190 S. aureus isolates of Sistan and baluchistan, 96 (50.5%) of Zahedan, 30 (15.7%) of Khash and 64 (33.6%) isolates of Iranshahr was collected. Also, out of 190 Sistan and baluchistan isolates, seq had the highest frequency and edinB had the lowest frequency, which were positive in 29 (15.2%) and 3 (1.5%) isolates, respectively. Moreover, out of 160 S. aureus isolates of Hamedan, the seq gene found in 22 (13.75%) isolates was more abundant. None of the isolates of S. aureus isolated from Hamadan had etD, etA, etB, lukF-PV and lukE-lukD genes. The prevalence of SAgs in female patients was higher than male patients. In addition, MDR strains also had the highest frequency of SAgs genes, Table 2.
Table 2

Prevalence of SAgs genes in S. aureus isolates from patients of Group 1 and Group 2

SAgs and toxins

Group 1

(n = 160)

Group 2

(n = 190)

MRSA

MSSA

Total in Group 1

Total in Group 2

Female

Male

Female

Male

Group 1

Group 2

Group 1

Group 2

SEA

5

12

11

14

11

20

6

6

17

26

SEB

1

10

9

10

7

11

4

8

11

19

SEC

3

2

5

16

6

19

0

2

5

21

SED

11

2

1

16

9

13

4

7

13

17

SEE

4

11

6

13

6

16

9

3

15

19

SEl-G

0

2

8

8

2

11

0

5

2

16

SEl-H

1

5

3

13

5

9

1

7

6

16

SEI

4

3

7

13

6

15

1

5

7

20

SEl-J

5

6

2

9

7

16

4

2

11

14

SEl-K

1

6

1

6

6

11

1

2

7

13

SEl-L

4

5

2

7

4

19

5

2

9

21

SEl-M

2

9

5

6

10

17

1

9

11

26

SEl-N

5

7

5

7

9

11

3

8

12

19

SEl-O

9

13

7

15

16

23

6

6

22

29

SEl-Q

8

13

9

12

19

17

2

2

21

19

TSST-1

0

1

4

10

1

9

0

5

1

14

etA

0

0

3

8

0

9

0

3

0

11

etB

0

0

3

6

0

8

0

1

0

9

lukS-PVL

0

2

2

4

2

5

0

3

2

8

lukF-PV

0

0

3

8

0

5

0

6

0

11

lukE-lukD

0

0

2

4

0

6

0

0

0

6

edinA

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

edinB

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

edinC

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

mecA

49

12

67

32

61

99

0

0

61

99

agr typing

In Group 1 out of 160 isolates of S. aureus, 104 (65%) agr positive and 56 (35%) agr negative were detected. The frequency of agr locus was identified as 27 (25.96%) agrA, 49 (47.11%) isolates agrB, 17 (16.34%) agrC and 11 (10.57%) agrD. In Group 2, among 190 isolates of S. aureus, 132 (69.47%) were positive for agr and 58 (30.52%) negative for agr. Also, the frequency of agr locus was detected as follows: agrA in 39 (29.54%) agrB in 55 (41.66%), agrC in 29 (21.96%) and agrD in 9 (6.81.96%), Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2.

Statistical analysis

In this study, using t-test and Chi2, there was a significant relationship between the SAgs and agr locus frequency. And also, a significant relationship was found between phenotypic antibiotic resistance and mecA.

Discussion

Staphylococcus aureus as a threatening agent in hospitals and societies has a diverse range of strategies including antibiotic resistance, virulence factors and precise regulatory systems which accurately control and synchronize pathogenicity [15]. Therefore, in order to find the relationship among agr types, superantigens production and resistance in MRSA strains, we investigated clinical isolates collected from two different regions of Iran, Hamadan (Group 1) and Sistan and Baluchistan (Group 2).

Among 160 isolates of Group 1 and 190 isolates of Group 2, agrII was the most prevalent type. Strains with agr typeII indicated the highest superantigens production in both groups (p < 0.05). SEl-Q, SEl-O and SEB showed the highest prevalence in Group 1 whereas in Group 2 SEl-O and SEA were observed as the most widespread ones. Also, TSST-1, exfoliative toxins and pantone valentine toxins were detected only in Group 2. As a common feature between both groups, superantigen production is more prevalent in MRSA strains than MSSA ones (p < 0.05).

Regarding to the different frequency of antibiotic resistant and pathogenic strains in Groups 1 and 2, it is suggested that different climate conditions may cause extensive changes in resistance and pathogenicity of the bacterium. As MacFadden et al. [16], Singer et al. [17], and Kurenbach et al. [18] studies prove this notion, differences in the patterns of climate can lead to widespread changes in antibiotic resistance patterns. Consistent with our results, Zhang et al. [19] demonstrated the effects of various environmental conditions on antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in bacteria. Agr typing as a convenient virulence typing method could contribute to a more precise understanding of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of staphylococcal infections [20]. Consistent with Collery, Nowrouzian and Chini, superantigen production in S. aureus is directly correlated to agr type of isolates. In so-called studies, the most prevalent superantigens were observed in agr types I and III, while in our study agrII was the predominant one [21, 22, 23, 24]. To explain, clonal differences of strains collected from different regions should be regarded. Based on Guijarro and khelissa studies, environmental clues influences on evolution processes of the organisms and consequently variety in characteristics of strains occurs [25, 26, 27]. Moreover, in MRSA strains mecA gene leads to some changes in virulence factors of the organism [28]. The activity of this gene affects some structural proteins such as agr, and agr-regulated SAgs such as TSST-1 and SEs, ETs and PVL are influenced [13]. As it is demonstrated in this study, there was a significant association between MRSA prevalence and superantigen production and interestingly superantigens which are regulated by agr system were predominated in Group 2. To illustrate, based on many studies, there is a direct relationship between presence of the mecA gene and the bacterial phenotypic resistance [29, 30, 31]. Studies by Vitali et al. [32], Duran et al. [33] have shown that the presence of the mecA gene could affect Staphylococcus aureus strains in terms of antibiotic resistance patterns. The results of antimicrobial resistance studies conducted in Group 2 were shown a high prevalence of resistance to antibiotics. Although multi-drug resistance strains were detected in both groups, MDR strains predominated in Group 2. As well, vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains in Group 2 were observed more than Group 1. Several factors could be involved in this difference containing age, gender, climatic conditions, food type and regional culture. According to Lundgren et al. [34], Norris et al. [35] and Wushouer et al. [36] which concluded that, cultural factor is one of the most important causes of antibiotic resistance. Consistent with the above mentioned studies, patients in Group 2 were more interested in taking different drugs, and patients in Group 1 showed less willingness to take medication.

In conclusion: a significant relationship between the SAgs frequency and agr locus in both groups has been indicated. Also, a substantial relevance has been found among phenotypic antibiotic resistance and mecA gene (p < 0.05). The production of superantigens in S. aureus plays an important role in the classification of agr locus, and this locus can affect differently in methicillin-resistant strains.

Limitations

The results of this study suggest that the activity of various promoters and operons (PII, PIII and egc operon) in S. aureus is directly related to agr locus. It seems that SAgs play a role as checkpoints of dissemination. In the current study, collaboration of antibiotic resistance with superantigen production has been proved (p < 0.05). However, the accurate mechanism of such a relationship should be unraveled.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

HT and SD performed microbiological and molecular tests and write the manuscript. MA supervised all of the stages of designing the study, conducting the research and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors of this article are grateful to Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for their financial support in conducting the research.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting the findings is contained within the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Code No: IR.UMSHA.REC.1395.757).

Funding

This Article was conducted on financial support of vice- chancellor for research of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. The role of the funding was to supply the acquisition of the necessary materials for the research. There isn’t any funding in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13104_2019_4166_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of the agr allelic profiles of Group 1 S. aureus. Table S2. Characteristics of the agr allelic profiles of Group 2 S. aureus.

References

  1. 1.
    Mino MJ, Ortiz RT, Randad P, Moffatt LT, Jordan MH, Shupp JW. Localization of superantigen virulence factors in kidney tissue of animals with Staphylococcus aureus-infected burn wounds. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34(1):142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vafaee Mehr M, Alikhani M, Tahmasebi H, Arabestani M. Identification and determination of the relationship between ccr alleles and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2017;19(12):28–35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardete S, Tomasz A. Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(7):2836–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleer A, Hemels MA, Paauw A, Krediet TG. Reduced expression of PBP-2A by neonatal mecA-positive coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) blood isolates: beta-lactams are useful first-line agents for the treatment of neonatal CoNS sepsis, restricting the use of vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(7):1616–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tahmasebi H, Zeiyni B, Dehbashi S, Motamedi H, Vafaeifar M, Keramat F, et al. The study of blaZ and mecA gene expression in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and the relationship between the gene expression patterns. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2017;35(443):1062–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deodhar D, Varghese G, Balaji V, John J, Rebekah G, Janardhanan J, et al. Prevalence of toxin genes among the clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and its clinical impact. J Glob Infect Dis. 2015;7(3):97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solanki LS, Srivastava N, Singh S. Superantigens: a brief review with special emphasis on dermatologic diseases. Dermatol Online J. 2008;14(2):3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuffs SW, James DBA, Bestebroer J, Richards AC, Goncheva MI, O’Shea M, et al. The Staphylococcus aureus superantigen SElX is a bifunctional toxin that inhibits neutrophil function. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(9):e1006461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dehbashi S, Tahmasebi H, Zeyni B, Arabestani M. The relationship between promoter-dependent quorum sensing induced genes and methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci. 2018;26(116):75–87.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beceiro A, Tomás M, Bou G. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: a successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(2):185–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bokaeian M, Tahmasebi H. Molecular identification of genes responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides and methicillin in clinical samples of Staphylococcus aureus. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2017;19(3):38–46.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schlievert PM, Case LC, Strandberg KL, Tripp TJ, Lin Y-C, Peterson ML. Vaginal Staphylococcus aureus superantigen profile shift from 1980 and 1981 to 2003, 2004, and 2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2704–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002;70(2):631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soares BS, Melo DA, Motta CC, Marques VF, Barreto NB, Coelho SMO, et al. Characterization of virulence and antibiotic profile and agr typing of Staphylococcus aureus from milk of subclinical mastitis bovine in State of Rio de Janeiro. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2017;69:843–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thompson TA, Brown PD. Association between the agr locus and the presence of virulence genes and pathogenesis in Staphylococcus aureus using a Caenorhabditis elegans model. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;54:72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacFadden DR, McGough SF, Fisman D, Santillana M, Brownstein JS. Antibiotic resistance increases with local temperature. Nat Clim Change. 2018;8(6):510–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer AC, Shaw H, Rhodes V, Hart A. Review of antimicrobial resistance in the environment and its relevance to environmental regulators. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurenbach B, Hill AM, Godsoe W, van Hamelsveld S, Heinemann JA. Agrichemicals and antibiotics in combination increase antibiotic resistance evolution. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang L, Rogers TJ. Assessment of the functional regions of the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Toxins. 2013;5(10):1859–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mullarky IK, Su C, Frieze N, Park YH, Sordillo LM. Staphylococcus aureus agr genotypes with enterotoxin production capabilities can resist neutrophil bactericidal activity. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Collery MM, Smyth DS, Tumilty JJ, Twohig JM, Smyth CJ. Associations between enterotoxin gene cluster types egc1, egc2 and egc3, agr types, enterotoxin and enterotoxin-like gene profiles, and molecular typing characteristics of human nasal carriage and animal isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 1):13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Collery MM, Smyth DS, Twohig JM, Shore AC, Coleman DC, Smyth CJ. Molecular typing of nasal carriage isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from an Irish university student population based on toxin gene PCR, agr locus types and multiple locus, variable number tandem repeat analysis. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(Pt 3):348–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nowrouzian FL, Dauwalder O, Meugnier H, Bes M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F, et al. Adhesin and superantigen genes and the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to colonize the infantile gut. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(5):714–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chini V, Dimitracopoulos G, Spiliopoulou I. Occurrence of the enterotoxin gene cluster and the toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is related to clonal type and agr group. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(5):1881–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guijarro JA, Cascales D, García-Torrico AI, García-Domínguez M, Méndez J. Temperature-dependent expression of virulence genes in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khelissa SO, Jama C, Abdallah M, Boukherroub R, Faille C, Chihib N-E. Effect of incubation duration, growth temperature, and abiotic surface type on cell surface properties, adhesion and pathogenicity of biofilm-detached Staphylococcus aureus cells. AMB Express. 2017;7:191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Corredor Arias LF, Luligo Espinal JS, Moncayo Ortiz JI, Santacruz Ibarra JJ, Álvarez Aldana A. Relationship between super antigenicity, antimicrobial resistance and origin of Staphylococcus aureus isolated. Colomb Med. 2016;47(1):15–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suryadevara M, Clark AE, Wolk DM, Carman A, Rosenbaum PF, Shaw J. Molecular characterization of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection in central New york children: importance of two clonal groups and inconsistent presence of selected virulence determinants. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2013;2(1):30–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Otarigho B, Falade MO. Analysis of antibiotics resistant genes in different strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Bioinformation. 2018;14(3):113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yilmaz S, Kilic A, Karagoz A, Bedir O, Uskudar Guclu A, Basustaoglu AC. Investigation of various virulence factors among the hospital and community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates by real-time PCR method. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012;46(4):532–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cameron DR, Howden BP, Peleg AY. The interface between antibiotic resistance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus and its impact upon clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(6):576–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vitali LA, Petrelli D, Lamikanra A, Prenna M, Akinkunmi EO. Diversity of antibiotic resistance genes and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements in faecal isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14(1):106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Duran N, Ozer B, Duran GG, Onlen Y, Demir C. Antibiotic resistance genes & susceptibility patterns in staphylococci. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(3):389–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Touboul-Lundgren P, Jensen S, Drai J, Lindbæk M. Identification of cultural determinants of antibiotic use cited in primary care in Europe: a mixed research synthesis study of integrated design “Culture is all around us”. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Norris P, Chamberlain K, Dew K, Gabe J, Hodgetts D, Madden H. Public beliefs about antibiotics, infection and resistance: a qualitative study. Antibiotics. 2013;2(4):465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wushouer H, Zhang ZX, Wang JH, Ji P, Zhu QF, Aishan R, et al. Trends and relationship between antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China: based on a 3 year surveillance data, 2014–2016. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(3):339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamed Tahmasebi
    • 1
  • Sanaz Dehbashi
    • 2
  • Mohammad Reza Arabestani
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Microbiology Department, School of MedicineZahedan University of Medical SciencesZahedanIran
  2. 2.Microbiology Department, Faculty of MedicineHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
  3. 3.Department of Microbiology, School of MedicineUniversity of HamadanHamadanIran
  4. 4.Brucellosis Research CenterHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran

Personalised recommendations