Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 11:729 | Cite as

Reference intervals of thyroid hormones in Khartoum, Sudan

  • Imad R. Musa
  • Nagi I. Ali
  • Sittana A. Elseed
  • Osman E. Osman
  • Ishag Adam
Open Access
Research note

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to establish the reference intervals (RIs) of thyroid function test among the adult Sudanese population in Khartoum, Sudan. A multi-stage survey stratified sampling method was used. Total triiodothyronine (TT3), total thyroxine (TT4) level and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were measured using radioimmunoassay gamma counter (Riostad, Germany) to determine the reference intervals.

Result

A total of 390 adults aged 20–75 years (male: 40.5%, female: 59.5%) were recruited. The median (95% intervals) serum TSH, TT4 and TT3 levels were 1.2 (0.50–3.1) mIU/L, 103.0 (63.0–159.0) nmol/L and 1.4 (0.8–2.7) nmol/L respectively. Compared with males; females had significantly lower TSH level and significantly higher TT4 level, but there was no significant difference when the TT3 level was assessed. While there was no significant difference in the level of TSH and T3 in the age group, T4 levels have shown a progressive increase with age. In summary the RIs for TSH, TT4 and TT3 in this setting were different from the levels provided by the manufacturers. A significant different was observed in TSH and FT4 when considering gender issue. The RIs were not different in the different age groups except for FT4.

Keywords

Thyroid TSH T3 T4 Sudan Radioimmunoassay 

Abbreviations

IDD

iodine deficiency disorders

NACB

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry

RIs

reference intervals

TFT

thyroid function test

TT3

total triiodothyronine

TT4

total thyroxine

TSH

thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)

WHO

World Health Organization

Introduction

Thyroid hormones are considered routine biochemical indices to assess and to diagnose thyroid functional disorders. It includes thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), total triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (FT3), total thyroxine (T4) and free thyroxine (FT4) [1]. Among these hormones, TSH is the most sensitive marker for thyroid dysfunction with a very important index for diagnosing subclinical thyroid functional diseases [2]. Besides, it has an essential role in adjusting the dose for treating both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Likewise it has a prognostic importance for tumor recurrence [3]. Hence it is wise to maintain lower levels of TSH in order to reduce its stimulatory effects on thyroid tissue. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) has recently pointed to the influence of many factors that might affect thyroid function tests: physiological factors (age and pregnancy), pathological factors (hospitalization and comorbidities), medications and iodine nutritional status on thyroid test values [4, 5]. It is recommended to consider these factors when issuing these guidelines in clinical practice [4]. The laboratory methods used for processing thyroid function tests may affect the final result  [6]. In fact, most clinical laboratories are still using the reference intervals (RIs) as recommended by the commercial assay manufacturers, which is promoted as a major barrier for the accurate and high-quality diagnosis of thyroid functional diseases [7]. Iodine status has its own influence on RIs for TFT. The World Health Organization (WHO), reported that more than 2.2 billion people from 130 countries are at risk for iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) [8]. Sudan is not exempted from IDD despite the fact that IDD control programs were initiated as early as the mid1970s [9, 10].

There is a need for establishing national reference intervals for thyroid function tests. Different TSH cut-off limits have been reported in population-based studies conducted in various countries [11]. The common practice in Sudan is still adopting the reference intervals (RIs) of thyroid function tests as suggested by the commercial assay manufacturers. The current study was conducted to establish the RIs of thyroid hormones in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan and to set reference intervals for thyroid function tests which will improve accuracy of diagnosing thyroid functional disorders.

Main text

Methods

A multi-stage survey was conducted in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan. A total of 390 adults Sudanese participants aged 20–75 years (male: 40.5%, female: 59.5%) were recruited as reference population for this study with an estimated response rate above 80%. Subjects with a history of thyroid disease, pregnant or breastfeeding women, those with moderate-to-severe ill health and subjects who were receiving medication that may affect the thyroid function, such as estrogen, amiodarone, anti-epileptic drugs, aspirin, glucocorticoids and excess iodine ingestion were excluded.

After signing an informed consent, all participants filled out questionnaires, that requesting information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle risk factors, family history of diseases, personal medical history and proper clinical examination to exclude goiter or palpable thyroid nodule. Based on the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) criteria for biochemical tests, a venous blood samples (1992) were collected and allowed to clot in plain tubes (Ningbo Greetmed Medical Instruments Co., Ltd, Ningbo, 315040 China), and the serum stored at (− 20 °C) until analyzed for measurement of TSHT T3 and T4 using Radioimmunoassay gamma counter (Riostad, Germany) and kits provided by Beijing Isotope Nuclear Electronic Co., Beijing, China. The corresponding normal levels of serum TSH, TT4 and TT3, provided by the manufacturers were 0.7–5 mIU/L, 60–160 mmol/L, 0.8–3.0 mmol/L, respectively.

Statistics

Data were entered in computer using IBM SPSS version 20 for Windows for analyses. Tukey’s methods were used for detecting the outliers and were removed [12]. Normality was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and TSH, T4 and T3 levels were not normally distributed. As recommended before by The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) non-parametric approach to RIs was sued where the median and 95.0% intervals were used to express the values for TSH, T4 and T3 [13]. The level of TSH, T4 and T3 were compared between male and females and between the different age groups using (non-parametric tests) Mann–Whitney U and by Kruskal–Wallis H, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

After removing the outliers (56) the data of 390 subjects were analyzed. Of the 390, 232 (59.5%) were females. As mentioned above the level of all the three investigated hormones was not normally distributed.

The median (95% intervals) of serum TSH, T4 and T3 levels were 1.2 (0.50–3.1) mIU/L, 103.0 (63.0–159.0) nmol/L and 1.4 (0.8–2.7) nmol/L respectively, Table 1.
Table 1

Median (95% intervals) of serum TSH, T4 and T3 levels according to age and gender in Khartoum, Sudan

Age groups, in years

Number

TSH, mIU/L

T4, nmol/L

T3 mIU/L

20–30

63

1.3 (0.5–3.5)

71.0 (29.8–81.0)

1.4 (0.8– 2.6)

31–40

61

1.3 (0.5–3.3)

87.0 (82.0–91.0)

1.4 (0.8–2.3)

41–50

100

1.4 (0.5–3.1)

98.0 (92.0–106.9)

1.4 (0.8–2.7)

51–60

91

1.2 (0.4–2.8)

121.0 (109.0–130.0)

1.5 (0.8–2.7)

> 60

75

1.0 (0.4–2.8)

148.0 (132.8–185.2)

1.5 (0.9–2.5)

P

 

0.124

< 0.001

0.182

Gender

 Male

158

1.7 (0.5–3.4)

96.5 (62.0–148.2)

1.5 (0.8–2.9)

 Female

232

1.1 (0.5–3.0)

106.0 (63.0–165.0)

1.4 (0.8–2.4)

 P

 

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.161

 Total

390

1.2 (0.50–3.1)

103.0 (63.0–159.0)

1.4 (0.8–2.7)

While there was no significant difference in the T3 level between male and females; compared with males; females had significantly lower TSH levels and significantly higher T4 levels, Table 1, Fig. 1a and b.
Fig. 1

a, b Comparing TSH and T4 between males and females

While there was no significant difference in the level of TSH and T3 in the age group, T4 levels have shown a progressive increase with age, Table 1, Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

ComparingT4 between the different age groups

Discussion

A different median (95% intervals) of serum TSH, T4 and T3 levels were obtained in the current study which were 1.2 (0.50–3.1) mIU/L, 103.0 (63.0–159.0) nmol/L and 1.4 (0.8–2.7) nmol/L respectively. This goes with our recent study which was conducted in western Sudan and achieved new RIs for the thyroid function tests: TSH (0.50–3.0), T4 (72.0–161.0) and T3 (0.8–2.8) [14]. Surprisingly, both studies reported slightly higher TSH levels than that obtained among pregnant women in Sudan (TSH 0.079–2.177 IU/ml) [15]. The RIs for TSH in the current study (0.50–3.1) were different and lower than that was given by the manufacturer (TSH 0.7–5 mIU/L). The same findings were obtained in different population across the world for reference intervals of TSH; In China, Northeast Germany, Japan, Mexico and Finland, RIs for TSH were (0.43–5.51 mIU/L), (0.49 –3.29  mIU/l) (0.44–4.93 mIU/L), (0.71–4.88  mIU/l) and (0.4–3.4 mU/L) respectively [7, 16, 17, 18, 19]. In contrast to these findings, no significant difference was obtained regarding the mean serum TSH level in one clinical study [17]. Likewise, some clinical data documented a difference in reference intervals for TT3 and TT4 from that was recommended by the manufacturer although this was not obtained in the current study [7, 20, 21]. Iodine status is a major factor that has its own influence on thyroid function and may explained the variation in the reference intervals in different studies. Adding to this, the relationship between iodine intake and developing thyroid disease is U-shaped [22]. Hence both, iodine deficiency or iodine more than needed has potential effects on determining the reference intervals (RIs) of thyroid hormones among these subjects [7]. Subjects living in regions with iodine deficiency, tend to have lower reference intervals for serum TSH levels than those in regions where iodine is sufficient: large parts of Europe where most countries are inherently iodine deficient [23], reveal a considerable lower reference of internals [24, 25]. In contrast, to what is mentioned above, a higher reference of intervals for TSH, is observed in North America [26] and East Asia where iodine adequacy is observed [17, 27]. Moreover, racial variation may affect the reference intervals as supported by one study that showed that the median TSH value and reference limits were lower in African Americans and non-Hispanics than in white American [28]. Likewise, a shift towards higher TSH concentrations and reference limits with age were obtained in an Ashkenazi Jewish population, which were related to the presence of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the regulatory/enhancer region of the TSH receptor gene [29].

Our study also found no significant difference in the T3 level between males and females. Interestingly, females had significantly lower TSH levels and significantly higher T4 levels than males. This was supported by Cai et al. [7] who pointed to gender variation when they reported a higher mean FT3, FT4 and T3 levels but lower mean TSH levels (1.38 mIU/L vs. 1.69 mIU/L), in males than females. Another study, showed the reference range for serum TSH levels was 0.64–8.24 mIU/L in all subjects, 0.7–8.95 mIU/L in women, and 0.56–7.15 mIU/L in men [17]. Interestingly, a recent study from Sudan, documented no significant difference in RIs for TFT, when gender issue was considered [14]. The gender as a culprit for variation in the results may be explained by the fact that TSH levels are controlled by estrogen, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors [21, 30, 31]. Hence females are more vulnerable to autoimmune thyroid disorders than males. In contrast to these findings, gender associated differences in mean values were observed for Total T4, FT3, and Total T3, but not for TSH and FT4 [20]. On the other hand, some clinical data showed no significant difference was reported for mean values of all thyroid hormones, [14] or for TSH levels [18]. Furthermore, another study showed no definitive sex-specific differences, when both serum TSH and FT3 concentrations were assessed [25].

The current study reported no significant difference in the level of TSH and T3 in the age groups, but T4 levels showed a significant progressive increase with age. We have recently reported (in Western Sudan) a higher of TSH levels among younger cases (age 31–40); while both T3 and T4 increased with progress in age [14]. Cai et al. [7] reported no significant difference in the level of TSH. Surprisingly, another study showed that, with increased age, serum FT4 levels were slightly lower in men when were compared to women [25]. Generally the effect of age on TFT is controversial as some studies demonstrated an increase in serum TSH reference limits with increasing age, [32, 33, 34, 35] whereas in other studies serum TSH reference limits decreased with aging [25, 36]. The discrepant findings of thyroid hormones among different age groups could be explained by iodine status [25, 28, 32, 33] in the different settings [34] and genetic factor [29].

Conclusion

The RIs for TSH, T4 and T3 in this setting were different from the levels provided by the manufacturers. The RIs were different in the different age groups and no significant gender difference was document when considering TSH and TT3.

The limitations of the study

The total levels rather than free T3, free T4 were investigated. Thyroid antibodies and urinary iodine were not investigated. The clinical judgment and not the ultrasound was used for the evaluation of the thyroid gland.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

IRM, NIA and IA conceived and designed the study. SAE and OEO recruited the participants. NIA and OEO participated in the biochemical work. IRM, SAE, OEO and IA analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All contributive authors of this original manuscript authorized the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the subjects for participating in this study.

Competing interests

IA (senior and corresponding author) is a member of the editorial board (Associate Editor) of this journal.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received ethical clearance from the Research Board at the Sudan Federal Ministry of Health. The reference number is 2015/13. Written informed consent was obtained from the entire enrolled participant.

Funding

None received.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Brabant G, Beck-Peccoz P, Jarzab B, Laurberg P, Orgiazzi J, Szabolcs I, et al. Is there a need to redefine the upper normal limit of TSH? Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:633–7.  https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laurberg P, Andersen S, Carlé A, Karmisholt J, Knudsen N, Pedersen IB. The TSH upper reference limit: where are we at? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7:232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho JW, Lee Y, Lee YH, Hong SJ, Yoon JH. Dynamic risk stratification system in post-lobectomy low-risk and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;89:100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demers LM, Spencer CA. Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:138–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor PN, Razvi S, Pearce SH, Dayan CM. A review of the clinical consequences of variation in thyroid function within the reference range. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:3562–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arzideh F, Wosniok W, Haeckel R. Indirect reference intervals of plasma and serum thyrotropin (TSH) concentrations from intra-laboratory data bases from several German and Italian medical centres. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:659–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai J, Fang Y, Jing D, Xu S, Ming J, Gao B, et al. Reference intervals of thyroid hormones in a previously iodine-deficient but presently more than adequate area of Western China: a population-based survey. Endocr J. 2016;63:381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Standing Committee on Nutrition U. SCN News No 35.at. https://www.unscn.org/web/archives_resources/files/scnnews35.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2018.
  9. 9.
    Ahmed EBM. Iodine Deficiency in Shendi Area in River Nile State, Northern Sudan. Eur J Prev Med. 2015;3:193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medani AMMH, Elnour AA, Saeed AM. Endemic goitre in the Sudan despite long-standing programmes for the control of iodine deficiency disorders. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:121–6.  https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.075002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biondi B, Cooper DS. The clinical significance of subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:76–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B, Tukey JW. Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:991–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solberg HE. The IFCC recommendation on estimation of reference intervals. The RefVal program. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42:710–4.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2004.121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali NI, Alamoudi AO, Adam I. Reference intervals of thyroid hormones in a previously iodine-deficient area in Darfur, Sudan. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018818781299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elhaj ET, Adam I, Ahmed MA, Lutfi MF. Trimester-specific thyroid hormone reference ranges in Sudanese women. BMC Physiol. 2016;16:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12899-016-0025-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ittermann T, Khattak RM, Nauck M, Cordova CMM, Volzke H. Shift of the TSH reference range with improved iodine supply in Northeast Germany. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshihara A, Noh JY, Ohye H, Sato S, Sekiya K, Kosuga Y, et al. Reference limits for serum thyrotropin in a Japanese population. Endocr J. 2011;58:585–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flores-Rebollar A, Moreno-Castañeda L, Vega-Servín NS, López-Carrasco G, Ruiz-Juvera A. Determination of thyrotropin reference values in an adult Mexican population. Endocrinol y Nutr. 2015;62:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langén VL, Niiranen TJ, Mäki J, Sundvall J, Jula AM. Thyroid-stimulating hormone reference range and factors affecting it in a nationwide random sample. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:1807–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quinn FA, Tam MCM, Wong PTL, Poon PKW, Leung MST. Thyroid autoimmunity and thyroid hormone reference intervals in apparently healthy Chinese adults. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;405:156–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kratzsch J, Fiedler GM, Leichtle A, Brügel M, Buchbinder S, Otto L, et al. New reference intervals for thyrotropin and thyroid hormones based on national academy of clinical biochemistry criteria and regular ultrasonography of the thyroid. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zou S, Wu F, Guo C, Song J, Huang C, Zhu Z, et al. Iodine nutrition and the prevalence of thyroid disease after salt iodization: a cross-sectional survey in Shanghai, a Coastal Area in China. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zimmermann MB, Andersson M. Update on iodine status worldwide. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012;19:382–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schalin-Jäntti C, Tanner P, Välimäki MJ, Hämäläinen E. Serum TSH reference interval in healthy Finnish adults using the Abbott Architect 2000i Analyzer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011;71:344–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Völzke H, Alte D, Kohlmann T, Lüdemann J, Nauck M, John U, et al. Reference intervals of serum thyroid function tests in a previously iodine-deficient area. Thyroid. 2005;15:279–85.  https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2005.15.279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, Hannon WH, Gunter EW, Spencer CA, et al. Serum TSH, T4, and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:489–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li C, Guan H, Teng X, Lai Y, Chen Y, Yu J, et al. An epidemiological study of the serum thyrotropin reference range and factors that influence serum thyrotropin levels in iodine sufficient areas of China. Endocr J. 2011;58:995–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spencer CA, Hollowell JG, Kazarosyan M, Braverman LE. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-thyroperoxidase antibody relationships demonstrate that TSH upper reference limits may be skewed by occult thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4236–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Atzmon G, Barzilai N, Surks MI, Gabriely I. Genetic predisposition to elevated serum thyrotropin is associated with exceptional longevity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:4768–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valeix P, Dos Santos C, Castetbon K, Bertrais S, Cousty C, Hercberg S. Thyroid hormone levels and thyroid dysfunction of French adults participating in the SU.VI.MAX study. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2004;65:477–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kimura T, Van Keymeulen A, Golstein J, Fusco A, Dumont JE, Roger PP. Regulation of thyroid cell proliferation by TSH and other factors: a critical evaluation of in vitro models. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:631–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boucai L, Hollowell JG, Surks MI. An approach for development of age-, gender-, and ethnicity-specific thyrotropin reference limits. Thyroid. 2011;21:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Surks MI, Boucai L. Age- and race-based serum thyrotropin reference limits. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tanda M, Piantanida E, Lai A, Lombardi V, Dalle Mule I, Liparulo L, et al. Thyroid autoimmunity and environment. Horm Metab Res. 2009;41:436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vadiveloo T, Donnan PT, Murphy MJ, Leese GP. Age- and gender-specific TSH reference intervals in people with no obvious thyroid disease in Tayside, Scotland: the Thyroid Epidemiology, Audit, and Research Study (TEARS). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1147–53.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ittermann T, Thamm M, Schipf S, John U, Rettig R, Völzke H. Relationship of smoking and/or passive exposure to tobacco smoke on the association between serum thyrotropin and body mass index in large groups of adolescents and children. Thyroid. 2013;23:262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King Abdu Aziz Armed Forces Hospital at Air BaseDhahranKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Sudan Atomic Energy CommissionKhartoumSudan
  3. 3.Department of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging, College of Applied Medical SciencesMajmaah UniversityMajmaahSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Faculty of MedicineAlneelain UniversityKhartoumSudan
  5. 5.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of KhartoumKhartoumSudan

Personalised recommendations