Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 11:712 | Cite as

Limitations in the isolation and stimulation of splenic mononuclear cells in a dasyurid marsupial, Phascogale calura

  • C. Letendre
  • L. J. Young
  • J. M. Old
Open Access
Research note

Abstract

Objective

Marsupials suffer from an increasing number of stressors in this changing world. Functional studies are thus needed to broaden our understanding of the marsupial immune system. The red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura) is a small Australian marsupial previously used in descriptive immunological studies. Here, we aimed to develop functional assays by isolating and stimulating blood and spleen mononuclear cells in vitro.

Results

While peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) were relatively easy to isolate, only 105 mononuclear cells (> 90% purity and > 75% viability) could be recovered from the spleen, independently of the sex and age of the animal or the centrifugation time and speed tested. The pores of the mesh sieve used for tissue homogenization might have been too big to yield a single cell suspension. Nevertheless, in spite of the overall low number of cells recovered, PBMC and splenic mononuclear cells were successfully activated in preliminary trials with phytohemaglutinin. This activation state was evidenced by a change in shape and the presence of small cell aggregations in the mitogen-stimulated cultures. A non-radioactive colorimetric assay was also performed to confirm cell proliferation in these wells. This work highlights the importance of developing and reporting detailed methodological protocols in non-traditional research species.

Keywords

Marsupials Dasyurid Spleen PBMC Mononuclear cells Cell culture Mitogen Phytohemaglutinin 

Abbreviations

AM

alveolar macrophages

ConA

concanavalin A

CpG

CpG oligodeoxynucleotide

LL

lentil lectin

LN

lymph nodes

LNMC

lymph node mononuclear cells

LPS

lipopolysaccharides

M\(\upphi\)

macrophages

MC

mononuclear cells

PA

protein A

PBMC

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PHA

phytohemaglutinin

PMA

phorbol myristate acetate

PWM

pokeweed mitogen

RBC

red blood cells

WBC

white blood cells

Introduction

Marsupials suffer from environmental and anthropogenic stressors that pose pressure on their immune system [1, 2]. Functional immunological studies are thus needed to develop relevant conservation strategies. The marsupial immune system has long been regarded as ‘primitive’, with reports of weak or delayed adaptive responses compared to eutherians [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. However, these differences might simply be due to the use of suboptimal assay conditions. There is now a growing body of evidence suggesting that the marsupial immune system is just as intricate and complex as that of eutherians [14].

Lymphocytes proliferate and become activated in response to antigens encountered in secondary lymphoid organs (e.g. spleen). Activated lymphocytes (CD4+ T cells in particular) produce cytokines and these immune-regulatory molecules determine the type of response generated [14]. Although mitogen stimulation induces non-specific activation, these assays have been used extensively in marsupials to investigate lymphocyte ‘fitness’ and their proliferative capacities (Table 1). Mitogen stimulation assays can be conducted on total splenocytes. However, characterization of the lymphocyte cytokine profile in response to certain stimuli is facilitated by the use of isolated mononuclear cells. In eutherians, splenic mononuclear cells are commonly isolated by density gradient separation after mechanical disruption and passage on a mesh sieve [15]. While some work has been done with marsupial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), mononuclear cells have only been isolated occasionally from lymphoid tissues (Table 1). This is due in part to the ethical limitations associated with collecting tissues from threatened/endangered animals, but most importantly to the low variety of tools and protocols available for these species [14].
Table 1

Mitogen stimulation in marsupials

Species

Tissue or cell type

Cell stimulant

Application

Refs.

Dendrolagus matschiei

Whole blood

PHA, ConA, PWM

[3H]-thymidine

[8]

Didelphis virginiana

Blood leukocytes

PHA, ConA, PWM

[3H]-thymidine

[13]

Macropus eugenii

PBMC, spleen MC and LNMC

PHA

[3H]-thymidine and MTT

[25]

LNMC

PHA, ConA

RNA extraction

[26, 27]

PBMC, LNMC

Zimosan, PHA, LPS, PWM

RNA extraction

[28, 29, 30, 31]

Monodelphis domestica

PBMC

ConA, PHA, PWM

[3H]-thymidine

[32]

Whole blood, spleen, LN, thymus, peritoneal M\(\upphi\), skin

PHA, ConA, PWM, LPS

[3H]-thymidine

[33, 34]

Whole blood

ConA

[3H]-thymidine

[6]

Onychogalea fraenata

Spleen MC

PHA

RNA extraction

[31]

Perameles gunnii

PBMC

ConA, PHA, PWM, LPS

[3H]-thymidine

[35]

Phascolarctos cinereus

Whole blood, PBMC

PHA and ConA, PWM, LL, jacalin, PA and LPS

[3H]-thymidine

[9]

PBMC

Ionomycin, PMA

Flow cytometry

[36]

PBMC

PMA and ionomycin, PMA and PHA, ConA

RNA extraction

[37, 38]

PBMC

PMA and ionomycin, C. pecorum

RNA extraction

[39, 40, 41]

Sarcophilus harrisii

PBMC

ConA, PHA, PWM, LPS

[3H]-thymidine

[35, 42]

PBMC

Poly(I:C), LPS, flagellin, imiquimod, CpG, profiling

RNA extraction

[43]

Setonix brachyurus

PBMC

PHA

[3H]-thymidine

[44]

Blood leukocytes, spleen, thymus, LN

PHA, ConA, PWM

[3H]-thymidine

[45, 46, 47]

Trichosurus caninus

PBMC

Ionomycin, PMA

Flow cytometry

[36]

Trichosurus vulpecula

Spleen

PHA

[3H]-thymidine

[3, 4]

PBMC

PHA

[3H]-thymidine

[48]

PBMC, spleen, AM

M. bovis, LPS, LAM

[3H]-thymidine, RNA extraction

[49, 50, 51]

PBMC

Ionomycin, PMA

Flow cytometry

[36]

PBMC, spleen MC, LNMC

ConA

[3H]-thymidine, RNA extraction

[52]

AM alveolar macrophages, ConA concanavalin A, CpG CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, LL lentil lectin, LN lymph nodes, LNMC lymph node mononuclear cells, LPS lipopolysaccharides, Mϕ macrophages, MC mononuclear cells, PA protein A, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PHA phytohemaglutinin, PMA phorbol myristate acetate, PWM pokeweed mitogen

The red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura) is an Australian daysurid. This small carnivorous marsupial breeds in captivity, which makes it an ideal research model [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. The species is best known for its particular life history, where males die shortly after the breeding season [23]. In captivity, males survive over one year of age, but become infertile and develop signs of accelerated aging and immunosenescence ([24], unpublished results). Given the important role of lymphocytes in the coordination of adaptive immunity, we aimed to isolate and stimulate these cells in vitro. Here, we show the limitations encountered while standardizing a protocol for isolation and stimulation of phascogale splenic mononuclear cells. The end goal of this research is to investigate the type and magnitude of cytokines produced across different age-sex groups. Demonstration of an impaired lymphocyte function in captive adult males would pave the way for future studies of immunosenescence in marsupials.

Main text

Methods

Animals

Red-tailed phascogales were sourced from a captive breeding colony housed in the Western Sydney University (WSU) School of Science and Health Native Mammal Teaching and Research Facility, Richmond, NSW, Australia. Animal care was as per the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes and the New South Wales Animal Research Act and its Regulations [24]. Protocols were approved by the WSU Animal Care and Ethics Committee (A11197). All samples were collected opportunistically from clinically healthy animals euthanized during routine population management procedures.

Cell isolation

Blood and spleen were collected aseptically, immediately after euthanasia with CO2. Samples were carried to the laboratory in an insulated cooler and were processed within 30 min of collection.

Blood Blood was collected via heart puncture (about 1 ml/animal) and placed into sodium EDTA-coated tubes. PBMC were isolated on a density gradient [25]. Blood was diluted with phenol red-free, endotoxin-free Hanks balanced salt solution with calcium and magnesium (HBSS+) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The final 4 ml suspension was layered onto 2 ml Ficoll-Paque (GE LifeSciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (1.077 g/ml). PBMC were collected at the interface after centrifugation (400g, 25 min). To confirm isolation of mononuclear cells, smears were made for each layer of the gradient using 2-µl drops and Diff-Quik staining (Bacto Laboratories, Australia). PBMC were washed with HBSS+. A tris-buffered ammonium chloride solution (0.16 mol/l ammonium chloride, 0.01 mol/l tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), pH 7.3) was used for red blood cell (RBC) lysis. After additional washing steps, PBMC were resuspended in 100–200 µl culture medium (see below). Cell count and viability were evaluated manually by Trypan blue exclusion. Mononuclear cell purity was assessed on Diff-Quik stained smears.

Spleen The spleen was transported into HBSS+ containing 200 U/ml penicillin, 200 µg/ml streptomycin and 100 µg/ml gentamicin. It was placed on a sterile 60-mesh stainless-steel sieve (pore size 250 µm) onto a collector tube, perfused with culture medium, teased apart using micro-dissecting scissors, and gently pushed through the sieve using a syringe plunger. The final volume of the splenic suspension was 4 ml. Total WBC counts were determined on an aliquot using Türk’s solution (0.01% crystal violet, 1% glacial acetic acid), which lyses RBC and stains leukocytes to assist counting [53]. The splenic suspension was layered onto 2 ml Ficoll-Paque and mononuclear cells were recovered at the interface following centrifugation (see conditions tested in Table 2). Finally, cells were washed and counted as described for PBMC. The recovery rate (%) corresponds to (number of mononuclear cells isolated)/(total number of WBC) × 100.
Table 2

Conditions tested for isolation of splenic mononuclear cells

Date

Sex (number of individuals pooled)

Age (months)

Conditions tested

Spleen cells

Speed (g)

Time (min)

RBCL

WBC count

Recovery (%)

Viability (%)

18 April 2017

F (1)

9

400

25

No

3.5 × 107

0.5

86

2 May 2017

M (1)

10

400

20

Yes

8.9 × 107

0.2

97

22 May 2017

M (1)

10

400

25

Yes

1.7 × 107

0.6

76

M (1)

10

400

25

Yes

7.1 × 107

1.2

82

29 June 2017

F (1)

11

400

25

Yes

6.5 × 106

0.5

88

6 July 2017

M (2)

12

400

25

Yes

3.2 × 107

0.1

72

18 July 2017

F (3)

12

400

25

Yes

8.8 × 107

0.1

88

25 July 2017

F (2)

12

400

20

Yes

1.9 × 107

0.0

68

M (2)

12

400

20

Yes

5.0 × 107

0.1

88

1 Aug 2017

M (2)

13

350

20

Yes

1.4 × 107

0.3

88

M (2)

13

400

15

Yes

1.5 × 107

0.2

75

23 Aug 2017

F (2)

13

400

15

No

2.3 × 107

1.0

87

8 Sept 2017

F (2)

14

400

15

No

3.1 × 107

0.1

78

4 Oct 2017

F (1)

4

400

15

No

2.1 × 107

0.7

85

Cell culture and stimulation

Cells were diluted to the desired concentration in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) with GlutaMAX supplement, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 50 μg/ml gentamicin and 5–10% fetal calf serum (FCS; LifeTechnologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were plated in adherent, flat bottom, 96-well plates. Plates were incubated at 35 or 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24–72 h. Cells were visualized using an Olympus CKX41 microscope. Culture conditions yielding the best viability were selected for the mitogen stimulation assay. Cells were stimulated with phytohemaglutinin from Phaseolus vulgaris (PHA-M; 10, 25 or 50 µg/ml; Sigma), based on concentrations reported for other species [3, 9, 25, 34, 35].

Quick Cell Proliferation Assay

The Quick Cell Proliferation Assay kit II (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used to quantify cell proliferation and viability of mitogen-stimulated cells, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The plate was read at 450 nm using a multi-well spectrophotometer (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) after 4 h incubation.

Statistics

A one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of PHA concentration on PBMC proliferation, and a two-way ANOVA for the effect of cell density and PHA treatment. p-values were Bonferroni-adjusted. The effect of PHA stimulation on splenocyte proliferation was analyzed using an independent sample T-test. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics software (v.24). p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Data are mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated.

Results and discussion

Isolation of splenic mononuclear cells

The protocol used here for isolation of splenic mononuclear cells is based on previous work in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) [25, 53], but was found to be suboptimal in the phascogale. In this study, only about 105 mononuclear spleen cells (> 90% purity and > 75% viability) were routinely recovered, independently of the sex and age of the animal or the technical conditions tested (Table 2). The phascogale spleen is obviously much smaller than that of a wallaby, but the number of cells recovered was still low compared to a murine spleen of similar size ([15], personal observation). Marx et al. similarly reported a low cell density for the opossum (Didelphis virginiana) spleen compared to mice [12]. To determine whether the low cell numbers obtained in this study were due to an inherent low cellular density or rather to a suboptimal isolation technique, we evaluated the total number of white blood cells (WBC) in the splenic suspension prior to the density gradient separation. We found that the phascogale spleen contained on average 3.7 ± 0.7 × 107 WBC, which means that only 0.4 ± 0.1% of these cells were effectively recovered (Table 2). In comparison, > 10% PBMC were routinely recovered under similar conditions: centrifugation of whole blood yielded a clear white band at the interface of the density gradient, which facilitated the recovery of mononuclear cells. Meanwhile, only a diffuse smear in the lower phase of the gradient was obtained with the splenic suspension. Spleen cells are highly heterogeneous: they could vary in their buoyancy and separate non-uniformly on the density gradient. Interestingly though, the number of splenic mononuclear cells recovered remained low with shorter centrifugation times (Table 2; 1 August 2017). This persistent non-uniform cell distribution could be explained by an inadequate homogenization and separation of the splenic tissue on the sieve. A sieve with 200-μm pores is typically recommended in mice for preparation of lymphoid cell suspensions [15]. However, we used a 250-µm sieve as described in the wallaby [25]. The sieve pores were therefore possibly too big to yield a single cell suspension. In fact, cell clumps were often visualized in smears from the lower phase of the gradient. In contrast, no such clumps were visualized during PBMC isolation. While the pore size of the mesh sieve appears critical for preparation of single cell suspensions, this information is rarely mentioned in the marsupial literature and should be included in future publications. At this stage, it also remains unclear whether the mononuclear cells of the phascogale and wallaby differ in their buoyancy, but this type of interspecies variation is well documented in eutherians [54]. Finally, since most RBC were removed by centrifugation, RBC lysis was eventually eliminated from the protocol to avoid any further cell loss and unnecessary damage (Table 2).

Culture of splenic and peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Given the low number of cells routinely recovered, the conditions tested for splenic mononuclear cells were based on those determined in pretrials with PBMC. Early standardization work was carried out as a series of small experiments testing only one variable at a time. Temperature was found to affect cell viability in vitro. It was drastically impaired when cells were incubated at 37 °C (15% after 24 h) compared to 35 °C (92% after 48 h, and 76% after 72 h). Lymphoid cells from another dasyurid, the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), have been cultured similarly at 35 °C [43]. Marsupials typically have a lower body temperature (by 1.0–3.0 °C) and a lower basal metabolic rate (by 30%) than eutherians [55]. However, marsupial cells are still generally cultured at 37 °C [4, 9, 25, 32, 36, 46]. The reasons for these interspecies variations remain unclear but may depend on the culture medium/buffer. Moreover, cell viability was density-dependent: good viability was obtained after 48–72 h with relatively high cell densities (0.5–1 × 106 cells/ml in 150–200 µl), as described in the wallaby [52]. Finally, different concentrations of FCS were tested [13], but viability remained unchanged at concentrations above 5% FCS.

Mitogen stimulation and assessment of proliferation

PBMC and splenic mononuclear cells progressively adopted an activated, Y-shaped morphology within 4–6 h of PHA stimulation [25]. Numerous small cell aggregations were also present after 24 h in mitogen-stimulated cultures. As accurate cell counts cannot be determined manually by Trypan blue exclusion when cells are aggregated, proliferation assays are routinely used (Table 1). The Quick Cell Proliferation Assay is a non-radioactive colorimetric approach where the amount of dye generated is proportional to the number of living cells [56]. Increased proliferation was observed both in PHA-stimulated PBMC and splenic mononuclear cell cultures (p = 0.020 and p = 0.023, respectively) (Fig. 1a, b). However, no dose–response was observed with increasing concentrations of PHA (p = 0.190). The strongest effect of mitogen stimulation was observed at high cell densities (p < 0.0005) (Fig. 1b). Similar results were obtained with splenic mononuclear cells, although only selected conditions could be tested with this cell type.
Fig. 1

Cell proliferation in response to stimulation with phytohemaglutinin (PHA). 2 × 105 PBMC were stimulated with different concentrations of PHA (final volume = 150 µl). After 48 h, reagent from the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay kit was added to each well and absorbance of the dye solution was measured at 450 nm after an additional 4 h of incubation. The graph shows the dose–response curve obtained for two individuals (a). 0.5–1.5 × 105 PBMC or 1 × 105 splenic mononuclear cells were stimulated with PHA (25 µg/ml; final volume = 150 µl) and proliferation was assessed after 48 h using the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay kit, as described in a. Work was performed in duplicates and data are expressed as mean ± SEM (b). Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (*p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.0005)

Limitations and conclusions

This work highlights the importance of developing rigorous methodological protocols in non-traditional research species as suboptimal assay conditions are likely to yield biased comparisons with other species. Technical details for isolation of lymphoid cells (sieve pore size, centrifugation time and speed) should be consistently reported in future publications to ensure repeatability across studies. Here, we offer preliminary results showing successful lymphocyte activation and proliferation in response to mitogen stimulation in the phascogale. Future studies investigating the impact of age and sex on lymphocyte function in this species will depend on the capacity to further increase the recovery of mononuclear cells. FACS sorting based on cell size and granularity might be a promising alternative.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

CL, LJY and JMO designed the research and analyzed the data; CL performed the experiments; CL and JMO wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mark Emanuel for technical assistance.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal care was in accordance with the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes and the New South Wales Animal Research Act and its Regulations. All protocols were approved by the WSU Animal Care and Ethics Committee (A11197).

Funding

The School of Science and Health provided financial support for the Small Native Mammal Teaching and Research Facility and the WSU Animal Care and Ethics Committee approved the animal research authorities. CL was supported by Higher Degree Research Funds allocated by WSU School of Science and Health and was the recipient of a Ph.D. Award granted by the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Duffus AL. Effects of environmental change on wildlife health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1534):3429–38.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hing S, Narayan E, Thompson RA, Godfrey S. A review of factors influencing the stress response in Australian marsupials. Conserv Physiol. 2014;2:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moriarty KM. A possible deficiency of cell-mediated immunity in the opossum, Trichosurus vulpecula, in relation to tuberculosis. N Z Vet J. 1973;21(8):167–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moriarty KM, Thomas MJ. Absence of lymphokine-enhanced macrophage migration in vitro in the Australian brush-tailed opossum, Trichosurus vulpecula. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1986;13(4):365–70.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jansen AM, Leon L, Machado GM, da Silva MH, Souza-Leão SM, Deane MP. Trypanosoma cruzi in the opossum Didelphis marsupialis: parasitological and serological follow-up of the acute infection. Exp Parasitol. 1991;73(3):249–59.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stone WH, Brunn DA, Foster EB, Manis GS, Hoffman ES, Saphire DG, VandeBerg JL, Infante AJ. Absence of a significant mixed lymphocyte reaction in a marsupial (Monodelphis domestica). Lab Anim Sci. 1998;48(2):184–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilkinson R, Kotlarski I, Barton M. Koala lymphoid cells: analysis of antigen-specific responses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1992;33(3):237–47.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montali RJ, Bush M, Cromie R, Holland SM, Maslow JN, Worley M, Witebsky FG, Phillips TM. Primary Mycobacterium avium complex infections correlate with lowered cellular immune reactivity in Matschie’s tree kangaroos (Dendrolagus matschiei). J Infect Dis. 1998;178(6):1719–25.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkinson R, Kotlarski I, Barton M, Phillips P. Isolation of koala lymphoid cells and their in vitro responses to mitogens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1992;31(1–2):21–33.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor DL, Burrell R. The immunologic responses of the North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana). J Immunol. 1968;101(6):1207–16.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rowlands DT. The immune response of adult opossums (Didelphis virginiana) to the bacteriophage f2. Immunology. 1970;18(2):149–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marx JJ, Burrell R, Fisher SQ. A study of the afferent and efferent limbs of the immune response in opossums. J Immunol. 1971;106(4):1043–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fox DH, Rowlands DTJ, Wilson DB. Proliferative reactivity of opossum peripheral blood leukocytes to allogeneic cells, mitogens, and specific antigens. Transplantation. 1976;21(2):164–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belov K, Miller RD, Old JM, Young LJ. Marsupial immunology bounding ahead. Aust J Zool. 2013;61(1):24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kruisbeek AM. Isolation of mouse mononuclear cells. Current Protocols in Immunology. 2000;39(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Old JM, Carman RL, Fry G, Deane EM. The immune tissues of the endangered red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura). J Anat. 2006;208(3):381–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borthwick CR, Old JM. Histological development of the immune tissues of a marsupial, the red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura). Anat Rec. 2016;299(2):207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borthwick CR, Young LJ, McAllan BM, Old JM. Identification of the mRNA encoding interleukin-6 and its receptor, interleukin-6 receptor alpha, in five marsupial species. Dev Comp Immunol. 2016;65:211–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hermsen EM, Young LJ, Old JM. Major histocompatibility complex Class II in the red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura). Aust Mamm. 2016;39(1):28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ong OTW, Green-Barber JM, Kanuri A, Young LJ, Old JM. Antimicrobial activity of red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura) serum. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;51:41–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ong OTW, Young LJ, Old JM. Sequences and expression of pathway-specific complement components in developing red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura). Dev Comp Immunol. 2016;65:314–20.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ong OTW, Young LJ, Old JM. Detection of an active complement system in red-tailed phascogales (Phascogale calura). Comp Clin Pathol. 2015;24(6):1527–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bradley AJ. Stress and mortality in the red-tailed phascogale, Phascogale calura (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1987;67(1):85–100.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stannard HJ, Borthwick CR, Ong O, Old JM. Longevity and breeding in captive red-tailed phascogales (Phascogale calura). Aust Mamm. 2013;35(2):217–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young LJ, Deane EM. Culture and stimulation of tammar wallaby lymphocytes. Vet Res Commun. 2007;31(6):685–701.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young LJ, Harrison GA. Molecular characterization of interleukin-1Beta in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). J Vet Med Sci. 2010;72(11):1521–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Young L. Expressed sequence identification and characterization of the cDNA for interleukin-4 from the mitogen-stimulated lymphoid tissue of a marsupial, Macropus eugenii. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011;140(3–4):335–40.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alsemgeest J, Old JM, Young LJ. Molecular characterisation and expression of Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-6Δ2 in the Tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii). Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;155(1–2):139–45.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alsemgeest J, Old JM, Young LJ. Further characterisation of cytokines in macropod marsupials: IL-10 and IL-10Δ3. Cytokine. 2016;88:37–44.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alsemgeest J, Old JM, Young LJ. The macropod type 2 interferon gene shares important regulatory and functionally relevant regions with eutherian IFN-γ. Mol Immunol. 2015;63(2):297–304.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suthers AN, Old JM, Young LJ. The common gamma chain cytokine interleukin-21 is expressed by activated lymphocytes from two macropod marsupials, Macropus eugenii and Onychogalea fraenata. Int J Immunogenet. 2016;43(4):209–17.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Infante AJ, Samples NK, Croix DA, Redding TS, VandeBerg JL, Stone WH. Cellular immune response of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica. Dev Comp Immunol. 1991;15(3):189–99.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brozek CM, Ley RD. Production of interleukin-1 in a South American opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Dev Comp Immunol. 1991;15(4):401–12.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brożek CM, Kaleta EW, Kusewitt DF, Ley RD. Proliferative responses of lymphocytes to mitogens in the gray, short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1992;31(1):11–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stewart NJ, Bettiol SS, Kreiss A, Fox N, Woods GM. Mitogen-induced responses in lymphocytes from platypus, the Tasmanian devil and the eastern barred bandicoot. Aust Vet J. 2008;86(10):408–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Higgins DP, Hemsley S, Canfield PJ. Assessment of anti-bovine IL4 and IFN gamma antibodies to label IL4 and IFN gamma in lymphocytes of the koala and brushtail possum. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2004;101(3–4):153–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maher IE, Griffith JE, Lau Q, Reeves T, Higgins DP. Expression profiles of the immune genes CD4, CD8beta, IFNgamma, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 in mitogen-stimulated koala lymphocytes (Phascolarctos cinereus) by qRT-PCR. PeerJ. 2014;2:e280.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maher IE, Higgins DP. Altered immune cytokine expression associated with KoRV B infection and season in captive koalas. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0163780.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mathew M, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Preliminary characterisation of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-10 responses to Chlamydia pecorum infection in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e59958.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mathew M, Waugh C, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Interleukin 17A is an immune marker for chlamydial disease severity and pathogenesis in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Dev Comp Immunol. 2014;46(2):423–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mathew M, Pavasovic A, Prentis PJ, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. Molecular characterisation and expression analysis of interferon gamma in response to natural Chlamydia infection in the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus. Gene. 2013;527(2):570–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kreiss A, Fox N, Bergfeld J, Quinn SJ, Pyecroft S, Woods GM. Assessment of cellular immune responses of healthy and diseased Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii). Dev Comp Immunol. 2008;32(5):544–53.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Patchett AL, Latham R, Brettingham-Moore KH, Tovar C, Lyons AB, Woods GM. Toll-like receptor signaling is functional in immune cells of the endangered Tasmanian devil. Dev Comp Immunol. 2015;53(1):123–33.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ashman R, Keast D, Stanley NF, Waring H. The in vitro response to phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) of leucocytes from intact and thymectomized quokkas. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1972;50(3):337–45.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ashman R, Keast D. The development of mitogen responses in the quokka, Setonix brachyurus. In: Proceedings of an international symposium on the phylogeny of T and B cells: 1–3 June 1976; New Orleans, Louisiana. 1976. p. 257–66.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ashman RB, Holmes RM, Keast D. The in vitro response to phytomitogens of marsupial leukocytes. Lab Anim Sci. 1976;26(5):777–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ashman RB, Holmes RM, Keast D. The effect of neonatal thymectomy on the ontogeny of mitogen responses in the quokka (Setonix brachyurus). Dev Comp Immunol. 1977;1(1):47–57.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baker ML, Gemmell E, Gemmell RT. Physiological changes in brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, transferred from the wild to captivity. J Exp Zool. 1998;280(3):203–12.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wedlock DN, Aldwell FE, Buddle BM. Molecular cloning and characterization of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) from the Australian common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. Immunol Cell Biol. 1996;74(2):151–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wedlock DN, Aldwell FE, Buddle BM. Nucleotide sequence of a marsupial interleukin-10 cDNA from the Australian brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). DNA Seq. 1998;9(4):239–44.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Buddle BM, Aldwell FE, Pfeffer A, de Lisle GW. Experimental Mycobacterium bovis infection in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula): pathology, haematology and lymphocyte stimulation responses. Vet Microbiol. 1994;38(3):241–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Young LJ, Cross ML, Duckworth JA, Flenady S, Belov K. Molecular identification of interleukin-2 in the lymphoid tissues of the common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. Dev Comp Immunol. 2012;36(1):236–40.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Young LJ. Cellular immune responses of marsupials: family macropodidae. Penrith: University of Western Sydney; 2002. http://p8081-handle.uws.edu.au.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/1959.7/12869. Accessed 22 Oct 2016.
  54. 54.
    Pertoft H, Laurent TC. Sedimentation of cells in colloidal silica (Percoll). In: Pretlow TG, Pretlow TP, editors. Cell separation: methods and selected applications. New York: Academic Press, Inc.; 1982. p. 115–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gaughan JB, Hogan LA, Wallage A. Thermoregulation in marsupials and monotremes. In: Klieve A, Hogan L, Johnston S, Murray P, editors. Marsupials and monotremes Nature’s enigmatic mammals. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2015. p. 85–144.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Alessio N, Del Gaudio S, Capasso S, Di Bernardo G, Cappabianca S, Cipollaro M, Peluso G, Galderisi U. Low dose radiation induced senescence of human mesenchymal stromal cells and impaired the autophagy process. Oncotarget. 2015;6(10):8155–66.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and HealthWestern Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations