Genome Medicine

, 10:24 | Cite as

Local adaptation in European populations affected the genetics of psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits

  • Renato Polimanti
  • Manfred H. Kayser
  • Joel Gelernter
Open Access
Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Disease Neurogenomics

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have used genome-wide data to investigate evolutionary mechanisms related to behavioral phenotypes, identifying widespread signals of positive selection. Here, we conducted a genome-wide investigation to study whether the molecular mechanisms involved in these traits were affected by local adaptation.

Methods

We performed a polygenic risk score analysis in a sample of 2455 individuals from 23 European populations with respect to variables related to geo-climate diversity, pathogen diversity, and language phonological complexity. The analysis was adjusted for the genetic diversity of European populations to ensure that the differences detected would reflect differences in environmental exposures.

Results

The top finding was related to the association between winter minimum temperature and schizophrenia. Additional significant geo-climate results were also observed with respect to bipolar disorder (sunny daylight), depressive symptoms (precipitation rate), major depressive disorder (precipitation rate), and subjective well-being (relative humidity). Beyond geo-climate variables, we also observed findings related to pathogen diversity and language phonological complexity: openness to experience was associated with protozoan diversity; conscientiousness and extraversion were associated with language consonants.

Conclusions

We report that common variation associated with psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits was affected by processes related to local adaptation in European populations.

Keywords

Evolution Natural selection Genetic diversity GWAS Polygenicity Psychiatry 

Abbreviations

BD

Bipolar disorder

DS

Depressive symptoms

eQTL

Expression quantitative trait locus

FDR

False discovery rate

GGH

Gamma-glutamyl hydrolase

GIDEON

Global Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Online Network

GO

Gene Ontology

GWAS

Genome-wide association study

LD

Linkage disequilibrium

MDD

Major depressive disorder

NOIA

Natural and Orthogonal InterAction

OPEN

Openness to experience

PRS

Polygenic risk score

SCZ

Schizophrenia

WinMaxTemp

Winter maximum temperature

WinMinTem

Winter minimum temperature

Background

Recent studies have used genome-wide data to investigate evolutionary mechanisms related to behavioral phenotypes, identifying widespread signals of positive selection (i.e., variants with beneficial effects on individual fitness increase in population frequency) in the predisposition to psychiatric disorder and behavioral traits [1, 2, 3]. Brain-related phenotypes have undergone polygenic adaptation (adaptation that occurs by simultaneous selection on variants at many loci) during different phases of human evolutionary history [4] including to the present day [5]. This is consistent with several other investigations that found evidence of polygenic adaptation for predisposition to a wide range of complex traits [6, 7, 8, 9]. These genome-wide signals of positive selection are the signatures of adaptation processes that occurred in response to environmental pressures. Single-variant analyses identified loci affected by local adaption (i.e., adaptation in response to selective pressure related to the local environment) to diet, pathogens, and geo-climate variables [10, 11]. Polygenic mechanisms have also been observed in response to local environments. The observed difference in height between northern and southern Europeans appears to be related to a highly polygenic mechanism [12]. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for height, skin pigmentation, body mass index, type 2 diabetes, Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis were tested with respect to geo-climate variables in worldwide populations, with the discovery of putative signals of local adaptation [9]. However, a recent analysis demonstrated that PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on populations of European descent generate biased results when applied to non-European samples [13]. PRS analysis should thus be limited to training and target datasets with the same ancestry backgrounds; we were therefore able to investigate local adaption only in European populations. To investigate whether molecular mechanisms at the basis of psychiatric/behavioral traits (Table 1) were affected by local-adaptation processes that occurred during the colonization of Europe [14], we conducted a PRS analysis based on GWASs of psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (Table 1) from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium [15, 16, 17], the Genetics of Personality Consortium [18, 19, 20], and the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium [21] in a sample of 2455 individuals from 23 European populations. Then, we conducted a Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis based on PRS results to provide information regarding the specific molecular mechanisms involved in the polygenic signatures of local adaptation observed.
Table 1

GWASs of psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits used to generate polygenic risk scores

Consortium

Trait

Abbreviation

Sample size

Publication year

Link

Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

Autism spectrum disorder

ASD

5305 cases

2015

https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/results-and-downloads

Bipolar disorder

BD

7481 cases

2011

Major depressive disorder

MDD

9240 cases

2013

Schizophrenia

SCZ

36,989 cases

2014

Genetics of Personality Consortium

Neuroticism

gpcNEURO

63,661

2015

http://www.tweelingenregister.org/GPC/

Extraversion

EXTRA

63,030

2016

Openness to experience

OPEN

17,375

2012

Agreeableness

AGREE

17,375

2012

Conscientiousness

CONS

17,375

2012

Social Science Genetic Association Consortium

Subjective well-being

SWB

298,420

2016

https://www.thessgac.org/data

Depressive symptoms

DS

161,460

2016

Neuroticism

ssgacNEURO

170,911

2016

Methods

Study population

The cohort used in the present study was previously investigated to analyze the genetic structure of European populations [22]. The sample included individuals from 23 different sampling sites located in one of 20 different European countries (Additional file 1: Table S1). The GeneChip Human Mapping 500K Array Set (Affymetrix) was used to genotype 500,568 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer as reported previously [22]. The analysis of identity-by-state values permitted us to exclude the possibility of the presence of related individuals (i.e., individuals who were genetically more similar than expected to another member of the same subpopulation) and outliers (i.e., individuals who were far less genetically similar than expected to the rest of the subpopulation). We used this genotype information for imputation to maximize a consistent SNP panel between this cohort and the GWAS summary statistics used for the PRS analysis. Pre-imputation quality control criteria were minor allele frequency ≥ 1%, missingness per marker ≤ 5%, missingness per individual ≤ 5%, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p > 10−4. We used SHAPEIT [23] for pre-phasing, IMPUTE2 [24] for imputation, and the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel [25]. We retained imputed SNPs with high imputation quality (genotype call probability ≥ 0.8), minor allele frequency ≥ 1%, missingness per marker ≤ 5%, and missingness per individual ≤ 5%. After applying the post-imputation quality control criteria, we retained information regarding 3,416,230 variants in a final sample of 2455 individuals. Principal component analysis of the final sample was conducted using PLINK 1.9 [26] after linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruning (R2 < 0.2) of the genotyped data. Principal components derived from genetic information were included in the regression model to adjust the analysis for population genetic background, which reflects the demographic history of European populations [27]. In line with previous PRS analyses [28, 29, 30, 31, 32], the initial analysis was conducted including the top 10 principal components. To verify whether residual population stratification affected our analysis, the top 20 principal components were included as covariates to confirm the reliability of the significant findings.

Local-adaptation variables

We extracted information regarding local adaptation by considering the location of the 23 sampling sites used to recruit the cohort investigated. Specifically, we considered three different types of variables: geo-climate (geographical coordinates, temperature, daylight, precipitation rate, and humidity), pathogen diversity (bacteria, protozoa, and virus), and language phonological complexity (consonants, segments, and vowels) (Table 2). Geo-climate information was extracted from ClimaTemps (available at http://www.climatemps.com/), which contains more than 12.5 million climate comparison reports providing information for more than 4000 locations worldwide. Data regarding pathogen diversity were extracted from the GIDEON (Global Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Online Network) database (available at https://www.gideononline.com/). This includes information regarding 350 infectious diseases and 1700 microbial taxa in 231 countries. Information about the phonological complexity of European languages was extracted from PHOIBLE Online (available at http://phoible.org/), which is a repository of cross-linguistic phonological inventory data including 2155 inventories that contain 2160 segment types found in 1672 distinct languages [33]. Correlations among local-adaptation variables were estimated using Spearman’s correlation test.
Table 2

Variables related to local adaptation tested

Category

Variable

Abbreviation

Source

Link

Geo-climate

Latitude

LAT

ClimaTemps

http://www.climatemps.com/

Longitude

LON

Altitude

ALT

Summer temperature

(Max-Min)

SumMaxTemp

SumMinTemp

Winter temperature (Max-Min)

WinMaxTemp

WinMinTemp

Precipitation rate (Max-Min)

MaxPrecipRate

MinPrecipRate

Relative humidity (Max-Min)

MaxRelHumidity

MinRelHumidity

Sunny daylight (Max-Min)

MaxSunnyDaylight

MinSunnyDaylight

Pathogen diversity

Virus

VirusDiversity

GIDEON

https://www.gideononline.com/

Bacteria

BacteriaDiversity

Protozoa

ProtozoaDiversity

Language phonological complexity

Segments

Segments

PHOIBLE

http://phoible.org/

Vowels

Vowels

Consonants

Consonants

Polygenic risk score analysis

We conducted a PRS analysis using PRSice software [34] (available at http://prsice.info/). For polygenic profile scoring, we used summary statistics generated from multiple large-scale GWASs of psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (Table 1) conducted by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium [15, 16, 17], the Genetics of Personality Consortium [18, 19, 20], and the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium [21]. None of the GWASs used in the present study showed evidence of inflation due to population stratification or other possible confounders. Since none of the samples included in our target dataset was used in the GWAS considered to generate the PRS, no systematic overlap is expected between training and target datasets. We considered multiple association p-value thresholds (PT = 5 × 10−8, 10−7, 10−6, 10−5, 10−4, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1) for SNP inclusion and calculated multiple PRSs for each trait investigated. The PRSs were calculated after using p-value-informed clumping with an LD cutoff of R2 = 0.3 within a 500-kb window, and excluding the major histocompatibility complex region of the genome because of its complex LD structure. The PRSs that were generated were fitted in regression models with adjustments for the top 10 ancestry principal components. Before being entered into the analysis, local-adaptation variables were normalized using appropriate Box-Cox power transformations to avoid biases due to the distribution of the phenotypes tested. We applied a false discovery rate (FDR) correction (q < 0.05) to correct for the multiple testing for the psychiatric/behavioral PRS × local-adaptation variables tested [35]. To verify that no systematic bias inflated our analyses, we also conducted a permutation analysis. Specifically, considering the significant datasets, we performed 10,000 permutations of the PRSs with respect to their associated variables and verified whether the observed differences were significantly different from the null distribution of the permuted results. To estimate the genetic correlation among psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits, we considered the information provided by LD Hub v1.3.1 [36] (available at http://ldsc.broadinstitute.org/ldhub/) and used the LD score regression method [37] for the missing pair-wise comparisons. Heritability statistics of the GWAS considered are reported in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis

To provide information regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in the signatures of local adaptation in psychiatric and behavioral traits, a GO enrichment analysis was conducted based on the PRS results; the variants included in the significant PRS and with nominally significant concordant direction with PRS direction were considered in the enrichment analysis. A description of the GO analysis based on PRS results was reported in previous studies [28, 29, 30]. Variants were then entered in the enrichment analysis performed using eSNPO [38]. This method permits one to conduct enrichment analysis based on information related to expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) rather than physical positions of SNPs and genes, integrating the eQTL data and GO, constructing associations between SNPs and GO terms, and then performing functional enrichment analysis. An FDR correction was applied to the enrichment results for multiple testing (q < 0.05). To validate the results further, we conducted a permutation analysis based on the variants obtained from the major depressive disorder (MDD)-altitude result (the one that gave the highest number of significant GO enrichments). Based on this SNP set, we generated 100 SNP sets using SNPsnap (available at https://data.broadinstitute.org/mpg/snpsnap/match_snps.html) [39] and the following matching criteria: minor allele frequency ± 5%, gene density ± 50%, distance to nearest gene ± 50%, LD independence (R2 = 0.3) ± 50%. The SNP sets generated were entered in the eSNPO analysis and the distribution of their results compared with those obtained from the SNP sets from the PRS analyses.

Natural and Orthogonal InterAction (NOIA) model

The NOIA model [40] was applied to validate the results related to single-locus and oligogenic signals identified by our PRS analysis. NOIA is able to estimate the interaction between genes (or epistasis), which is a key process in determining the effect of genomic variants in complex diseases and the adaptation and evolution of natural populations [41]. We performed NOIA analysis testing the genotypes of the variants included in the significant PRSs with respect to local-adaptation variables identified. The NOIA analysis was conducted using the R package noia (available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/noia/index.html).

Data sources

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its additional files. GWAS summary association data used to calculate PRSs in this study were obtained from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (available at https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/results-and-downloads/), the Genetics of Personality Consortium (available at http://www.tweelingenregister.org/GPC/), and the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium (available at https://www.thessgac.org/data).

Results

As expected, the set of variables related to the local environment were strongly intercorrelated (Fig. 1; Additional file 3: Table S3). Similarly, psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits showed strong genetic correlations (Fig. 2; Additional file 4: Table S4). We considered multiple GWAS significance thresholds to test PRSs [34], investigating both oligogenic and polygenic mechanisms (i.e., local-adaptation processes affecting few and many loci, respectively). To adjust our analysis for population genetic background, which reflects the demographic history of European populations [27], we included the top 10 principal components reflecting population ancestry variation as covariates in the regression models. This approach was considered on the basis of the experience of many GWAS and PRS analyses conducted on samples containing populations of different European descents. The use of 10 principal components is generally considered a standard approach to adjust within ancestry population stratification. However, to demonstrate that our findings are not due to the genetic relationships among European populations, we recalculated the significant PRS results (Table 3) considering 20 principal components in the regression models, and then tested for differences with respect to the original model: we did not observe significant differences between the two models (Additional file 5: Table S5).
Fig. 1

Correlations (Spearman’s rho) among variables related to local adaptation (left). Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. Additional file 3: Table S3 reports details of the correlation analysis. Asterisks (*) indicate correlations surviving Bonferroni multiple testing correction. Yellow, purple, and cyan colors indicate variables related to geo-climate, pathogen diversity, and language phonological complexity, respectively. Hierarchical clustering based on Spearman’s rho was generated considering absolute correlation distances

Fig. 2

Genetic correlation (linkage disequilibrium score regression rg) among psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (right). Additional file 4: Table S4 reports details of the correlation analysis. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. Asterisks (*) indicate correlations surviving Bonferroni multiple testing correction. Green and orange colors indicate psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits, respectively. Hierarchical clustering based on genetic correlation was generated considering absolute correlation distances

Table 3

Top significant associations of psychiatric and behavioral polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with the 13 local-adaptation variables identified. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2

Local-adaptation variable

PRS

PT

SNP N

R 2

Z score

p value

q value

MaxSunnyDaylight

BD

0.01

2833

0.09%

−2.93

3.42 × 10−3

0.043

Consonants

CONS

0.5

60,620

0.28%

−2.97

2.98 × 10−3

0.043

Latitude

DS

10−7

1

0.09%

3.47

5.38 × 10−4

0.029

SumMaxTemp

0.12%

−3.40

6.91 × 10−4

0.029

MinPrecipRate

0.05

12,832

0.27%

−3.29

1.03 × 10−3

0.029

MaxPrecipRate

MDD

0.3

39,390

0.31%

−3.21

1.33 × 10−3

0.034

Altitude

1

97,481

0.31%

−3.13

1.79 × 10−3

0.037

ProtozoaDiversity

OPEN

10−6

2

0.18%

3.56

3.82 × 10−4

0.029

SumMinTemp

5 × 10−8

1

0.18%

2.7

3.02 × 10−3

0.043

WinMinTemp

SCZ

0.5

104,106

0.40%

3.84

1.28 × 10−4

0.029

Longitude

0.13%

−3.29

1.01 × 10−3

0.029

WinMaxTemp

0.12%

2.96

3.09 × 10−3

0.043

MinRelHumidity

SWB

10−6

4

0.21%

−2.95

3.22 × 10−3

0.043

Considering the results that survived FDR multiple testing correction (q < 0.05; Additional file 6: Table S6), we observed 13 variables related to local adaptation: 11 geo-climate variables, one related to pathogen diversity, and one related to language phonological complexity. Table 3 reports the top associations that survived FDR multiple testing correction for each of these 13 local-adaptation variables. Figure 3 reports full visualization of the results for all comparisons (psychiatric/behavioral PRS × local-adaptation variables). We confirmed the reliability of the significant results empirically by generating a null distribution from 10,000 permutations of the original datasets and comparing the permuted results with the observed ones (Additional file 7: Figure S1). Since polygenic signatures of local adaptation have previously been reported in height genetics of European populations [12], we used this trait as a positive control for our approach. With this analysis, we replicated the presence of adaptation signals in the genetics of this trait (p < 0.05; Additional file 8: Table S7).
Fig. 3

PRS results (Z scores) for psychiatric/behavioral traits × local-adaptation variables. Positive and negative associations are indicated in blue and red, respectively (bright shade q < 0.05, light shade p < 0.05). White cells indicate associations with p > 0.05. Color schemes for local-adaptation variables and psychiatric/behavioral traits are reported in the legends of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. Additional file 6: Table S6 reports the summary statistics of the PRS analysis

The strongest result was observed between the schizophrenia (SCZ) PRS and winter minimum temperature (WinMinTemp): higher WinMinTemp correlates with increased SCZ genetic risk (SNP N = 104,106, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.40%, Z = 3.84, p = 1.28 × 10−4, q = 0.029). Higher WinMinTemp was also associated with increased MDD PRS (SNP N = 8160, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.30%, Z = 3.34, p = 8.46 × 10−4, q = 0.029) and increased extraversion PRS (SNP N = 7, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.26%, Z = 3.14, p = 1.75 × 10−3, q = 0.037). While the MDD result is concordant with the SCZ-MDD genetic correlation, the extraversion finding seems to be independent of the SCZ and MDD results. The SCZ PRS was also associated with winter maximum temperature (WinMaxTemp) and longitude; the three environmental variables are highly correlated, and the results are driven by the same mechanism related to winter temperature. Covarying these three local-adaptation variables, WinMaxTemp appears to be the driving signal among the correlated results (p < 0.05; Additional file 9: Table S8).

To understand better the molecular processes involved in this association, we conducted a GO enrichment analysis based on the PRS result. We observed 16 GOs that survived FDR multiple testing correction (q < 0.05; Additional file 10: Table S9). Among the other significant PRS associations, we observed significant GO enrichments (N = 54; Additional file 11: Table S10) in the negative association between altitude and MDD PRS (SNP N = 97,481, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.31%, Z = −3.13, p = 1.79 × 10−3, q = 0.037) only. Five GO enrichments are significant in both SCZ and MDD analyses (GO:0008285~negative regulation of cell proliferation, GO:0017147~Wnt-protein binding, GO:2000041~negative regulation of planar cell polarity pathway involved in axis elongation, GO:0071481~cellular response to X-ray, and GO:0090244~Wnt signaling pathway involved in somitogenesis); two of these are related to the Wnt signaling pathway. To confirm empirically that these enrichment results are not false positives, we conducted a permutation analysis: we generated 100 random sets of LD-independent variants derived from the SNPs included in the MDD analysis (which was the one that gave the highest number of GO enrichments), considering minor allele frequency, gene density, distance to nearest gene, and LD independence as matching criteria. There was no permuted set with more than two significant GO enrichments (i.e., the empirical probability to observe a random set with more than two significant GO enrichments is p < 0.01; Additional file 12: Figure S2); the overall probability to observe a significant GO enrichment from a permuted set is p = 6.69*10−5 (Additional file 13: Figure S3); and none of the four GOs shared by SCZ and MDD results resulted in significance in the permuted sets (q > 0.18).

Among the psychiatric disorders investigated, MDD and depressive symptoms (DS) showed a very strong genetic correlation (rg = 1, p = 1.77 × 10−36). In accordance with this genetic overlap, we observed a convergence in the local-adaptation findings that survived multiple testing correction. The MDD and DS PRS showed concordant negative associations with precipitation rate (PR): maximum PR (SNP N = 39,390, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.31%, Z = −3.21, p = 1.33 × 10−3, q = 0.034) and minimum PR (SNP N = 12,832, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.27%, Z = −3.29, p = 1.03 × 10−3, q = 0.029), respectively. The same DS PRS also nominally replicated the negative association with maximum PR (SNP N = 12,832, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.16%, Z = −2.28, p = 0.022).

An additional polygenic signature of local adaptation was observed between bipolar disorder (BD) and maximum sunny daylight, where increased daylight is associated with reduced BD genetic risk (SNP N = 2833, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.09%, Z = −2.93, p = 3.42 × 10−3, q = 0.043).

The results discussed above are related to highly polygenic local-adaptation mechanisms (i.e., thousands of variants involved). However, we also observed some instances of local adaptation involving few loci. Among them, the strongest signal was the positive association between protozoa diversity and openness-to-experience (OPEN) score including the top two associated variants (rs1477268 and rs10932966; SNP N = 2, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.18%, Z = 3.56, p = 3.82 × 10−4, q = 0.029). An OPEN score including only rs1477268 showed a positive association with summer minimum temperature (SNP N = 1, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.18%, Z = 2.7, p = 3.02 × 10−3, q = 0.043). Another single-locus result was observed between rs6992714, which is associated with DS risk, and latitude (SNP N = 1, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.09%, Z = 3.47, p = 5.38 × 10−4, q = 0.029) and summer maximum temperature (SNP N = 1, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.12%, Z = −3.40, p = 6.91 × 10−4, q = 0.029). According to GTEx data [42], rs6992714 is associated with GGH (gamma-glutamyl hydrolase) gene expression (beta = −0.13, p = 3.3 × 10−5; Additional file 14: Figure S4). NOIA analysis confirmed the presence of additive effects in the models based on the single-locus and oligogenic PRS with respect to the local-adaptation variables identified as significant (p < 0.05; Additional file 15: Table S11).

Finally, we observed a genetic association with respect to language phonological complexity: the number of consonants in European languages is positively associated with genome-wide PRS of conscientiousness (SNP N = 60,620, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.28%, Z = −2.97, p = 2.98 × 10−3, q = 0.043) and extraversion (SNP N = 3261, Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.26%, Z = 2.87, p = 4.13 × 10−3, q = 0.049).

Discussion

There are many datasets available with information regarding positive selection signatures in reference European populations [43, 44]. We previously used these available data, observing a significant enrichment for positive selection in the genetics of psychiatric disorders [1]. Comparable results have been observed by independent groups using different approaches [2, 3]. Our current analysis provides novel data with respect to local-adaptation differences among European populations. Indeed, considering positive selection signals in a reference European population, the signatures of positive selection are those shared by European populations and those specific for that particular population. With local-adaptation analysis, we are investigating the differences in selective pressures among a set of distinct European populations. Thus, the signals detected in the reference population may not overlap with those related to the local-adaptation mechanisms. To be able to use tests for positive selection (e.g., haplotype-based methods), we would need a larger sample in each of the populations considered.

Our PRS analysis identified 20 associations that survived FDR multiple testing correction (Additional file 5: Table S5). The specific characteristics of the sample investigated may generate false positive results due to several factors (e.g., different sample sizes at the different populations and non-random spatial sampling). However, our permutation analysis of the significant PRS results (i.e., we permuted the genetic scores with respect to the environmental variables) indicated that there is little possibility of bias due to the composition of the sample investigated.

Our findings appear to indicate that psychiatric and behavioral traits are not necessarily the outcomes selected by evolutionary pressures; some of the molecular pathways involved in their predisposition were affected by local adaptation. We observed some convergence between our local-adaptation findings and known epidemiological evidence. However, our findings should be related to evolutionary forces that acted on a population level, while epidemiological evidence should be due to mechanisms that acted on an individual level. We hypothesize that evolutionary forces shaped the genetic diversity of European populations, while individual-level changes should be due to post-genetic changes (e.g., epigenetic modifications) or the interaction of social-psychological risk factors on loci affected by local adaptation.

The strongest result observed between the SCZ PRS and WinMinTemp is in line with previous epidemiological studies. Season of birth is a widely recognized SCZ risk factor, where there is significantly increased risk associated with winter birth [45]. Our current finding may justify a molecular hypothesis: loci associated with increased SCZ risk may have undergone local adaptation related to winter conditions. The same environmental pressure may be responsible for the winter-birth risk through epigenetic mechanisms in line with the convergence between regional DNA methylation changes and signals of local adaptation reported for other loci [46]. Our GO enrichment analysis highlighted Wnt signaling as one of the molecular processes affected by this local-adaptation mechanism. This biological pathway is well studied in relation to both psychiatric disorders and human evolution; synaptic Wnt signaling is implicated as a possible contributor to several major psychiatric disorders due its involvement in neural differentiation processes [47]. Signatures of positive selection were reported in relation to the Wnt signaling pathway in multiple species [48]. Our present findings indicate that risk loci for psychiatric disorders involved in this molecular pathway could have been under local adaptation in European populations.

Another result in line with a known epidemiological association is the negative association between maximum sunny daylight period and BD (bipolar disorder) PRS. Seasonality of BD symptoms is common and, in particular, light exposure during early life may have important consequences for those who are susceptible to bipolar disorder [49]. More generally, lack of daylight is implicated in mood change in seasonal affective disorder [50]. Our finding indicates that daylight may have acted as a local selective pressure with respect to molecular pathways involved in BD pathogenesis.

As mentioned above, we also observed some instances of local adaptation involving oligogenic and single-locus signals. Although top results from GWASs of psychiatric and behavioral traits do not explain a large percentage of the variance, loci surviving stringent significance cutoffs usually show larger effect sizes, suggesting that they may be involved in key mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the traits investigated. Among the oligogenic signals, the strongest finding is the association of OPEN PRS, including the top two associated variants (rs1477268 and rs10932966), with protozoa diversity and summer minimum temperature. These two results appear concordant with the strong positive correlation between summer minimum temperature and protozoa diversity (Spearman’s rho = 0.75, p = 4.51 × 10−5), which is consistent with the relationship between temperature and pathogen diversity [51]. rs1477268 is located near RAS1, which was implicated by previous studies as being involved in pathogen response [52]. From GTEx data [42], rs10932966 is significantly associated with RP11-16P6.1 gene expression in multiple human tissues (Additional file 16: Table S12), but no information regarding its function is available. We hypothesize that these loci have been under local selective adaption in response to pathogen-related selective pressure. This is in line with the consistent literature regarding the role of selective pressures induced by pathogen diversity in shaping human genome diversity [6].

Another single-locus result was observed between rs6992714, which is associated with DS risk, with latitude and summer maximum temperature. This genetic variant is associated with GGH gene expression, which was previously implicated as involved in the pathogenesis of tropical sprue, a malabsorption syndrome commonly found in tropical regions [53]. According to our data, GGH may have been under local adaptation in relation to selective pressures induced by summer temperatures. The associations discussed appear to be related to the effect of selective pressures induced by geo-climate and pathogen-related variables on the human genome.

The relationship between genetic and language diversities has been investigated from several perspectives [54], and genetic associations with language phonological complexity require careful consideration. Our data indicate that there is at least a partial relationship between genetic variation and language diversity that is not driven by their shared association with human demographic history (which should be reflected by the genetic diversity accounted for by the adjustment for principal components derived from genetic data). This supports two possible converse scenarios: (1) genetic variation may have contributed to shape European language diversity; (2) European language diversity may have been a local selective pressure that shaped the genetics of behavioral traits. Although it is not possible to establish causality or a mechanism based on our current data, phonological working memory appears to be associated with extraversion and conscientiousness [55], in agreement with the relationship highlighted by our results.

Conclusions

We report the first evidence regarding the role of local adaptation in shaping the genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits. We hypothesize that most of our findings are due to the effects of local selective pressure on molecular pathways involved in the predisposition to these complex traits. Due to the presence of pervasive pleiotropy among them, some of the “evolutionary selected” pathways (e.g., the Wnt signaling pathway identified in the present study) are shared by multiple traits. Although our analysis was adjusted for human demographic history through principal components, we cannot exclude that genes involved in behavioral traits may have had a role in population migrations. Further analyses will be needed to explore this hypothesis. The main limitation of our current investigation is the impossibility of investigating local-adaptation mechanisms in non-European populations due to the general lack of large GWASs in individuals of African, Middle Eastern, Central Asian, East Asian, Native American, and Oceanic descents. Additionally, larger target cohorts with more individuals per population and more populations may permit one to detect further signals of local adaptation in the genetics of psychiatric and behavioral traits.

Notes

Acknowledgements

All volunteers included in the cohort of individuals of European descent are gratefully acknowledged for sample donation. We thank Oscar Lao for his useful comments on the manuscript. The authors are also grateful to the research groups of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, the Genetics of Personality Consortium, and the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium for their publicly available GWAS summary statistics.

Funding

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 DA12690, R01 AA017535, P50 AA012870, U01 MH109532, and R21 AA024404, the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Mental Illness Research Education Clinical Centers of Excellence, a National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator (NARSAD) Award from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, and an Explorer Grant from the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

RP and JG were involved in the study design. MHK was involved in cohort ascertainment and recruitment. RP carried out the statistical analysis. RP wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Contributing studies provided individual-level genotype data or summary statistics consistent with their institutional review board-approved protocols.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13073_2018_532_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Details of the European samples investigated. (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM2_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S2. Heritability statistics (LD score regression) of the GWASs considered. (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM3_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Additional file 3: Table S3. Correlations (Spearman’s rho, upper triangular; p value, lower triangular) among variables related to local adaptation. p values surviving Bonferroni multiple testing correction are reported in red. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 16 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM4_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Additional file 4: Table S4. Genetic correlation (rg, upper triangular; p value, lower triangular) among psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits. p values surviving Bonferroni multiple testing correction are reported in red. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 14 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM5_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Additional file 5: Table S5. Comparisons of regression models including 10 principal components (10PC) vs. 20 principal components (20PC). The 10PC model is the model tested in the main analysis and included as covariates 10 principal components derived from genetic information. The 20PC model was run on the top significant findings and included as covariates 20 principal components derived from genetic information. P10vs20 is the p value calculated testing the difference between these two models. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 13 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM6_ESM.docx (28 kb)
Additional file 6: Table S6. Best associations for each of the PRS × local-adaptation variables tested. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 27 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM7_ESM.docx (135 kb)
Additional file 7: Figure S1. Null distribution generated from 10,000 random permutations of the significant PRS datasets. Blue lines represent the observed results. Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 135 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM8_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Additional file 8: Table S7. Association between height PRS and local-adaptation variables. Abbreviations are reported in Table 2. (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM9_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Additional file 9: Table S8. Covariate analysis of SCZ PRS with respect to winter minimum temperature (WMinTemp), winter maximum temperature (WMaxTemp), and longitude (LON). We report top PRS cutoff and cutoff obtained from the main analysis. (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM10_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Additional file 10: Table S9. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment in the SCZ-WinMinTemp (Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2) result that survived FDR multiple testing correction (q < 0.05). (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM11_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Additional file 11: Table S10. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment in the MDD-altitude result that survived FDR multiple testing correction (q < 0.05). Abbreviations are reported in Table 1 and Table 2. (DOCX 14 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM12_ESM.docx (226 kb)
Additional file 12: Figure S2. Distribution of the results of GO enrichment analysis from 100 random sets. Orange line represents q < 0.05. (DOCX 225 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM13_ESM.docx (70 kb)
Additional file 13: Figure S3. Overall distribution of q values generated from the GO enrichment analysis of 100 random sets. The red line represents q < 0.05. (DOCX 69 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM14_ESM.docx (141 kb)
Additional file 14: Figure S4. Significant association of rs6992714 with GGH gene expression. (DOCX 140 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM15_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Additional file 15: Table S11. Addictive effects in variants included in single-locus and oligogenic PRS from NOIA analysis. (DOCX 12 kb)
13073_2018_532_MOESM16_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Additional file 16: Table S12. Significant associations of rs10932966 with RP11-16P6.1 gene expression in multiple tissues. (DOCX 11 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Polimanti R, Gelernter J. Widespread signatures of positive selection in common risk alleles associated to autism spectrum disorder. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006618.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu K, Schadt EE, Pollard KS, Roussos P, Dudley JT. Genomic and network patterns of schizophrenia genetic variation in human evolutionary accelerated regions. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:1148–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Srinivasan S, Bettella F, Mattingsdal M, Wang Y, Witoelar A, Schork AJ, Thompson WK, Zuber V, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium TIHGC, Winsvold BS, et al. Genetic markers of human evolution are enriched in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80:284–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beiter ER, Khramtsova EA, van der Merwe C, Chimusa ER, Simonti C, Stein J, Thompson P, Fisher S, Stein DJ, Capra JA, et al. Polygenic selection underlies evolution of human brain structure and behavioral traits. bioRxiv. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1101/164707.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mullins N, Ingason A, Porter H, Euesden J, Gillett A, Olafsson S, Gudbjartsson DF, Lewis CM, Sigurdsson E, Saemundsen E, et al. Reproductive fitness and genetic risk of psychiatric disorders in the general population. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15833.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daub JT, Hofer T, Cutivet E, Dupanloup I, Quintana-Murci L, Robinson-Rechavi M, Excoffier L. Evidence for polygenic adaptation to pathogens in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1544–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen ME, Hunt SC, Stone RC, Horvath K, Herbig U, Ranciaro A, Hirbo J, Beggs W, Reiner AP, Wilson JG, et al. Shorter telomere length in Europeans than in Africans due to polygenetic adaptation. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:2324–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polimanti R, Yang BZ, Zhao H, Gelernter J. Evidence of polygenic adaptation in the systems genetics of anthropometric traits. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berg JJ, Coop G. A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hancock AM, Witonsky DB, Gordon AS, Eshel G, Pritchard JK, Coop G, Di Rienzo A. Adaptations to climate in candidate genes for common metabolic disorders. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polimanti R, Piacentini S, Iorio A, De Angelis F, Kozlov A, Novelletto A, Fuciarelli M. Haplotype differences for copy number variants in the 22q11.23 region among human populations: a pigmentation-based model for selective pressure. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:116–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turchin MC, Chiang CW, Palmer CD, Sankararaman S, Reich D, Genetic Investigation of ATC, Hirschhorn JN. Evidence of widespread selection on standing variation in Europe at height-associated SNPs. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1015–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin AR, Gignoux CR, Walters RK, Wojcik GL, Neale BM, Gravel S, Daly MJ, Bustamante CD, Kenny EE. Human demographic history impacts genetic risk prediction across diverse populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100:635–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Key FM, Fu Q, Romagne F, Lachmann M, Andres AM. Human adaptation and population differentiation in the light of ancient genomes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Large-scale genome-wide association analysis of bipolar disorder identifies a new susceptibility locus near ODZ4. Nat Genet. 2011;43:977–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium, Ripke S, Wray NR, Lewis CM, Hamilton SP, Weissman MM, Breen G, Byrne EM, Blackwood DH, Boomsma DI, et al. A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014;511:421–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Moor MH, Costa PT, Terracciano A, Krueger RF, de Geus EJ, Toshiko T, Penninx BW, Esko T, Madden PA, Derringer J, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:337–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van den Berg SM, de Moor MH, Verweij KJ, Krueger RF, Luciano M, Arias Vasquez A, Matteson LK, Derringer J, Esko T, Amin N, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for extraversion: findings from the Genetics of Personality Consortium. Behav Genet. 2016;46:170–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Genetics of Personality Consortium, de Moor MH, van den Berg SM, Verweij KJ, Krueger RF, Luciano M, Arias Vasquez A, Matteson LK, Derringer J, Esko T, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism, and the polygenic association with major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:642–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okbay A, Baselmans BM, De Neve JE, Turley P, Nivard MG, Fontana MA, Meddens SF, Linner RK, Rietveld CA, Derringer J, et al. Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nat Genet. 2016;48:624–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lao O, Lu TT, Nothnagel M, Junge O, Freitag-Wolf S, Caliebe A, Balascakova M, Bertranpetit J, Bindoff LA, Comas D, et al. Correlation between genetic and geographic structure in Europe. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1241–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Delaneau O, Marchini J, Zagury JF. A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nat Methods. 2011;9:179–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howie B, Marchini J, Stephens M. Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3 (Bethesda). 2011;1:457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galinsky KJ, Bhatia G, Loh PR, Georgiev S, Mukherjee S, Patterson NJ, Price AL. Fast principal-component analysis reveals convergent evolution of ADH1B in Europe and East Asia. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98:456–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Polimanti R, Amstadter AB, Stein MB, Almli LM, Baker DG, Bierut LJ, Bradley B, Farrer LA, Johnson EO, King A, et al. A putative causal relationship between genetically determined female body shape and posttraumatic stress disorder. Genome Med. 2017;9:99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Polimanti R, Chen CY, Ursano RJ, Heeringa SG, Jain S, Kessler RC, Nock MK, Smoller JW, Sun X, Gelernter J, Stein MB. Cross-phenotype polygenic risk score analysis of persistent post-concussive symptoms in U.S. Army soldiers with deployment-acquired traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:781–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polimanti R, Kaufman J, Zhao H, Kranzler HR, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC, Stein MB, Gelernter J. Trauma exposure interacts with the genetic risk of bipolar disorder in alcohol misuse of US soldiers. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137:148–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou H, Polimanti R, Yang BZ, Wang Q, Han S, Sherva R, Nunez YZ, Zhao H, Farrer LA, Kranzler HR, Gelernter J. Genetic risk variants associated with comorbid alcohol dependence and major depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:1234–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang Q, Polimanti R, Kranzler HR, Farrer LA, Zhao H, Gelernter J. Genetic factor common to schizophrenia and HIV infection is associated with risky sexual behavior: antagonistic vs. synergistic pleiotropic SNPs enriched for distinctly different biological functions. Hum Genet. 2017;136:75–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moran S, McCloy D, Wright R. PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; 2014.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Euesden J, Lewis CM, O'Reilly PF. PRSice: polygenic risk score software. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1466–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng J, Erzurumluoglu AM, Elsworth BL, Kemp JP, Howe L, Haycock PC, Hemani G, Tansey K, Laurin C, Early G, et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:272–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh PR, ReproGen C, Psychiatric Genomics C, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control C, Duncan L, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1236–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li J, Wang L, Jiang T, Wang J, Li X, Liu X, Wang C, Teng Z, Zhang R, Lv H, Guo M. eSNPO: An eQTL-based SNP ontology and SNP functional enrichment analysis platform. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pers TH, Timshel P, Hirschhorn JN. SNPsnap: a Web-based tool for identification and annotation of matched SNPs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:418–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alvarez-Castro JM, Carlborg O. A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait loci analysis. Genetics. 2007;176:1151–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harris RA, Alcott CE, Sullivan EL, Takahashi D, McCurdy CE, Comstock S, Baquero K, Blundell P, Frias AE, Kahr M, et al. Genomic variants associated with resistance to high fat diet induced obesity in a primate model. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:580–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pybus M, Luisi P, Dall'Olio GM, Uzkudun M, Laayouni H, Bertranpetit J, Engelken J. Hierarchical boosting: a machine-learning framework to detect and classify hard selective sweeps in human populations. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3946–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Field Y, Boyle EA, Telis N, Gao Z, Gaulton KJ, Golan D, Yengo L, Rocheleau G, Froguel P, McCarthy MI, Pritchard JK. Detection of human adaptation during the past 2000 years. Science. 2016;354:760–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB, Westergaard T, Wohlfahrt J, Ewald H, Mors O, Andersen PK, Melbye M. Effects of family history and place and season of birth on the risk of schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:603–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Racimo F, Gokhman D, Fumagalli M, Ko A, Hansen T, Moltke I, Albrechtsen A, Carmel L, Huerta-Sanchez E, Nielsen R. Archaic adaptive introgression in TBX15/WARS2. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:509–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Okerlund ND, Cheyette BN. Synaptic Wnt signaling—a contributor to major psychiatric disorders? J Neurodev Disord. 2011;3:162–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Holstein TW. The evolution of the Wnt pathway. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a007922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bauer M, Glenn T, Alda M, Andreassen OA, Angelopoulos E, Ardau R, Baethge C, Bauer R, Baune BT, Bellivier F, et al. Influence of light exposure during early life on the age of onset of bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;64:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dauphinais DR, Rosenthal JZ, Terman M, DiFebo HM, Tuggle C, Rosenthal NE. Controlled trial of safety and efficacy of bright light therapy vs. negative air ions in patients with bipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 2012;196:57–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cohen JM, Civitello DJ, Brace AJ, Feichtinger EM, Ortega CN, Richardson JC, Sauer EL, Liu X, Rohr JR. Spatial scale modulates the strength of ecological processes driving disease distributions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E3359–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xie JL, Grahl N, Sless T, Leach MD, Kim SH, Hogan DA, Robbins N, Cowen LE. Signaling through Lrg1, Rho1 and Pkc1 governs Candida albicans morphogenesis in response to diverse cues. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tomkins A. Tropical malabsorption: recent concepts in pathogenesis and nutritional significance. Clin Sci (Lond). 1981;60:131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Creanza N, Ruhlen M, Pemberton TJ, Rosenberg NA, Feldman MW, Ramachandran S. A comparison of worldwide phonemic and genetic variation in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:1265–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moyer A. Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: the critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Appl Linguist. 2014;35:418–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renato Polimanti
    • 1
  • Manfred H. Kayser
    • 2
  • Joel Gelernter
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryYale School of Medicine and VA CT Healthcare CenterWest HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Genetic IdentificationErasmus University Medical Center, RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands
  3. 3.Departments of Genetics and NeuroscienceYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations