Advertisement

BMC Chemistry

, 13:30 | Cite as

Crystalline characteristics of annealed AlN films by pulsed laser treatment for solidly mounted resonator applications

  • H. K. LinEmail author
  • Y. J. Huang
  • W. C. Shih
  • Y. C. Chen
  • W. T. Chang
Open Access
Research article
  • 141 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Materials and Macromolecular Chemistry

Abstract

AlN films were deposited on Si substrates using a reactive RF magnetron sputtering process and then the films were annealed by using different laser powers and wavelengths (355 nm, 532 nm and 1064 nm). For all three laser systems, the (002) peak intensity was obviously improved following laser irradiation. The improvement in the crystalline property was particularly obtained in the AlN film processed at 355 nm. In particular, given the use of the optimal laser power (0.025 W), the (002) peak intensity was 58.7% higher than that of the as-deposited film. The resonant frequency and 3 dB bandwidth of a SMR filter with an unprocessed AlN film were found to be 2850 MHz and 227.81 MHz, respectively. Following laser treatment with a wavelength of 1064 nm and a power of 0.25 W, the resonant frequency changed from 2850 to 2858 MHz. Moreover, 3 dB bandwidth changed from 227.81 to 202.49 MHz and the return loss of the filter reduced from 17.28 to 16.48 dB. Overall, the results thus show that the frequency response of the SMR filter can be adjusted and the return loss reduced by means of laser treatment with an appropriate wavelength.

Keywords

Laser Acoustic wave device AlN Annealing 

Introduction

Acoustic wave devices are widely used in the wireless communication field. Surface acoustic wave filters (SAWFs) [1, 2, 3] and film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) [4, 5, 6] have attracted particular attention as a means of achieving high operating frequencies (exceeding gigahertz) in radio frequency (RF) communications. In realizing such devices, the acoustic wave is confined to resonate as a standing wave using either air gap isolated resonators or solidly mounted resonators (SMRs) [7, 8, 9]. SMRs typically consist of a Bragg reflector and a piezoelectric film sandwiched between two electrodes.

The performance of acoustic wave filters is highly dependent on the crystalline quality of the piezoelectric layer. Of the various piezoelectric materials available, single crystal aluminum nitride (AlN) is one of the most commonly used in the optoelectronic, sensor and wireless communication fields due to its wide bandgap (6.2 eV), favorable thermal conductivity (> 100 W/mk) and high dielectric constant (~ 8.5) [10, 11, 12]. AlN piezoelectric films can be deposited using various methods, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [13], reactive sputtering [14], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [15], and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [16]. However, irrespective of the method used, the quality of the AlN film (and hence the device performance) is strongly dependent on the nitrogen concentration and the processing parameters [15]. Various studies have shown that the crystalline structure of AlN films can be improved through post-deposition plasma, laser, or rapid thermal annealing (RTA) treatment [12, 17, 18]. Lee also reported that an excellent return loss of the solidly mounted resonator-type film bulk acoustic wave resonator devices were observed after the post annealing process [19]. High crystallinity AlN films were obtained by modulating the growth temperature and thermal annealing conditions. High thermal annealing temperature and short annealing time further improve the crystallinity and also preserve the smooth surface [20]. For (10-1-3) and (11-22) AlN layers grown on m-plane sapphire, the crystal quality improved with increasing annealing temperature up to 1700 °C because the density of basal plane stacking faults reduced. These results indicate that the thermal annealing technique offers a new way of fabricating highly efficient semipolar UV LEDs on sapphire substrates [21]. Moreover, laser annealing has been applied in various fields, including active-matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED), metallic glass thin films, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), and thin film bulk acoustic wave (TFBAR) [22, 23]. Compared to these traditional annealing techniques, laser annealing has advantages including faster actuation response, rapidly cooling rate and controllable penetration depth into the substrate. It is beneficial for a uniform concentration, lower defect density and local heating area [24]. Cheng [25] reported that laser treatment results in an effective improvement in the c-axis preferred orientation of ZnO films and is thus beneficial in reducing the return loss of ZnO-based longitudinal mode FBARs.

In the present study, the SMR device is consisted by Bragg reflector, AlN thin films and electrode. Firstly, the Bragg reflector is fabricated on Si substrate, and then the bottom electrode is fabricated on Bragg reflector through DC sputter combined with lithography process technology. Secondly, the AlN thin films are deposited on the bottom electrode using reactive RF magnetron sputter. Finally, top electrode is constructed on the AlN thin films by lithography process technology; the SMR device is then completed. The AlN films are then treated by laser irradiation using various laser powers and wavelengths. The effects of the laser processing parameters on the crystalline quality, optical transmittance, resonant frequency and return loss properties of the AlN films are then examined and compared.

Experiment

As shown in Fig. 1, the SMR devices fabricated in this study consisted of a Si substrate, a Bragg reflector, an AlN piezoelectric layer, bottom and top electrodes. The AlN film was deposited on the Si substrate using a reactive RF magnetron sputtering system with an Al target. The sputtering process was performed using a N2/(N2 + Ar) flow of 60%, a base pressure of 5 × 10−7 Torr, and a working pressure of 10 mTorr. In addition, the substrate was maintained at a temperature of 300 °C and the sputtering power was set as 230 W.
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of SMR filter device

Following the deposition process, the AlN films were treated using three different laser systems, namely a near infrared laser (SPI G3) with a wavelength of 1064 nm, a Green laser (Coherent MATRIX 532-7-30) with a wavelength of 532 nm, and a UV laser (Coherent AVIA 355–7000) with a wavelength of 355 nm. In laser patterning processes, the diameter of the laser spot, D0, can be calculated as
$$D_{0} = 1.22 \times \left( {\frac{\lambda \times F}{{n \times W_{d} }}} \right) \times M^{2} ,$$
(1)
where λ is the laser wavelength, F is the focal length, n is the refractive index of the working material, Wd is the diameter of the incident laser beam, and M2 is the laser quality factor. For the NIR laser, M2 was equal to 1.3, F was 163 mm, and Wd was 7.2 mm. Meanwhile, for the Green laser, M2, F and Wd were equal to 1.3, 330 mm and 5.8 mm, respectively. Finally, for the UV laser, M2 was equal to 1.3, F was 100 mm, and Wd was 3.5 mm. The spot diameters for the three laser systems were thus equal to 40, 50 and 17 μm, respectively. For each system, the laser power was set in the range of 0.01–1.5 W and the scanning speed was fixed at 5 mm/s.
The relative enhancement in the XRD peak intensity, IR, can be quantified as
$${\text{I}}_{\text{R}} = \left( {{\text{I}} - {\text{I}}_{\text{o}} } \right)/{\text{I}}_{\text{o}} ,$$
(2)
where IR is the relative enhancement in the XRD peak intensity, I is the intensity following laser treatment, Io is the initial intensity.

The surface morphologies of the various samples were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JSM-7600F). Moreover, the microstructures of the samples were examined using an X-ray Diffractometer (Bruker D8) with Cu-Ka radiation. The optical transmittance was measured using a UV–VIS-IR spectrophotometer (Lambda 35). Finally, the frequency response of the SMR filters was measured using a network analyzer (E5071C) and a CASCADE high-frequency probe (RHM-06/V + GSG 150).

Results and discussions

Figure 2 presents a cross-sectional SEM image of the as-deposited AlN film. As shown, the film has a thickness of approximately 1.3 μm. Figure 3 shows the XRD spectra of the as-deposited AlN film and the film annealed by these laser systems. It is seen that the preferred (002) orientation of the AlN film is obtained in both samples. However, it is evident that the annealing process results in a significant increase in the (002) peak intensity. The UV annealing process increases the (002) peak intensity by 58.7% compared to that of the as-deposited AlN sample. The relative improvement for the Green and NIR system is seen to be 16.8% and 36.8%, respectively.
Fig. 2

SEM cross-sectional image of as-deposited AlN film

Fig. 3

XRD profiles of as-deposited AlN film and AlN film annealed using three laser systems: a UV, b green and c NIR

Figure 4 shows the relative enhancement in the (002) peak intensity as a function of the laser power for all three laser systems. It is apparent that the effectiveness of the different laser systems in improving the crystal quality of the AlN film is extremely sensitive to the processing power. From inspection, the optimal powers of the UV (355 nm), Green (532 nm) and NIR (1064 nm) laser systems are equal to 0.025 W, 0.15 W and 0.25 W, respectively. Given these values of the laser power, the relative improvement in the (002) peak intensity is seen to be 58.7%, 16.8% and 36.8%, respectively. Figure 5 presents SEM images of the as-deposited AlN film and the AlN films processed by the UV laser with various powers. For laser powers lower than 0.05 W, the AlN film has a dense microstructure with a strong c-axis orientation. In other words, a recrystallization of the as-deposited film occurs following the laser treatment process. However, for powers greater than 0.1 W, the AlN films have a cracked and rough surface due to the ablation effect caused by the higher thermal input energy. As a result, the (002) peak intensity of the AlN film is significantly reduced, as shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Relative improvement in (002) peak intensity as function of laser power for laser systems with different wavelengths

Fig. 5

SEM images of as-deposited and UV-annealed AlN films: a as-deposited, b 0.025 W, c 0.05 W and d 0.1 W

Figure 6 shows the reflectance spectrum of the as-deposited AlN film. From inspection, the reflectance values of the AlN films processed using the NIR, Green and UV laser systems are 61, 51 and 46%, respectively. In other words, the absorption of the AlN film increases with a decreasing wavelength. It is noted that this finding is consistent with the results presented in Fig. 4, which show that the optimal power (0.025 W) for the UV system (wavelength 355 nm) is lower than that (0.25 W) of the NIR laser system (wavelength 1064 nm). Figure 7 shows the center frequency response of two SMR filters containing an as-deposited AlN film and an AlN film annealed using the NIR laser system with a power of 0.25 W, respectively. The SMR filter containing an unprocessed AlN film has a resonant frequency of 2850 MHz. However, following laser irradiation, the resonant frequency increased to 2858 MHz, while the frequency of 3 dB bandwidth changes from 227.81 to 202.49 MHz. In addition, the return loss of the SMR filter decreases from 16.48 dB in the untreated condition to 17.28 dB in the annealed condition as a result of the improved crystalline quality of the AlN film. Overall, the results show that the resonant frequency and return loss of the SMR filter can both be adjusted through the use of an appropriate laser treatment process.
Fig. 6

Reflectance spectrum of the as-deposited AlN film

Fig. 7

Resonant frequency of SMR filters with as-deposited and annealed AlN films

Conclusions

AlN films have been deposited on Si substrates using a reactive sputtering process. The AlN films have been laser annealed with various laser powers and wavelengths. The XRD results have shown that the laser annealing process yields an effective improvement in the (002) peak intensity of the AlN film. For irradiation wavelengths of 355, 532 and 1064 nm, the optimal laser power has been found to be 0.025, 0.15 and 0.25 W, respectively. The corresponding enhancement in the (002) peak intensity is equal to 58.7%, 16.8% and 36.8%, respectively. For a SMR filter with an as-deposited AlN film, the resonant frequency is equal to 2850 MHz and the 3 dB bandwidth is 227.81. Following laser treatment with a wavelength of 1064 nm and a power of 0.25 W, the resonant frequency increases to 2858 MHz. In addition, the 3 dB bandwidth reduces to 202.49 MHz and the return loss reduces from 17.28 to 16.48 dB. In other words, the resonant frequency of the SMR filter can be tuned and the return loss reduced through the use of a laser irradiation process with appropriate wavelength and power settings.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

HKL conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and drafted the manuscript. YJH carried out the laser and film studies. WCS prepared the AlN film and solidly mounted resonators. YCC participated in the design of the resonator and helped to draft the manuscript. WTC did some microstructure experiments. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Nos. MOST 105-2221-E-020-007 and 104-2221-E-020-007.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Colin KC (1989) Applications of surface acoustic and shallow bulk acoustic wave devices. Proc IEEE 77:1453–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lange K, Rapp BE, Rapp M (2008) Surface acoustic wave biosensors: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 391(5):1509–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Afzal A, Iqbal N, Mujahid A, Schirhagl R (2013) Advanced vapor recognition materials for selective and fast responsive surface acoustic wave sensors: a review. Anal Chim Acta 787:36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Serhane R, Abdelli-Messaci S, Lafane S, Khales H, Aouimeur W, Hassein-Bey A, Boutkedjirt T (2014) Pulsed laser deposition of piezoelectric ZnO thin films for bulk acoustic wave devices. Appl Surf Sci 288:572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang X, Xu WC, Chae J (2011) Temperature effects on a high Q FBAR in liquid. Sensor Actuators A Phys 166(2):264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin RC, Chen YC, Chang WT, Cheng CC, Kao KS (2008) Highly sensitive mass sensor using film bulk acoustic resonator. Sens Actuators A 147(2):425–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma G, Liljeholm L, Enlund J, Bjurström J, Katardjiev I, Hjort K (2010) Fabrication and characterization of a shear mode AlN solidly mounted resonator-silicone microfluidic system for in-liquid sensor applications. Sens Actuators A 159(1):111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen D, Xu Y, Wang J, Zhang L, Wang X, Liang M (2010) The AlN based solidly mounted resonators consisted of the all-metal conductive acoustic Bragg reflectors. Vacuum 85(2):302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    García-Gancedo L, Pedrós J, Iborra E, Clement M, Zhao XB, Olivares J, Capilla J, Luo JK, Lu JR, Milne WI, Flewitt AJ (2013) Direct comparison of the gravimetric responsivities of ZnO-based FBARs and SMRs. Sens Actuators B Chem 183:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong HS, Chung GS (2010) Humidity sensing characteristics of Ga-doped zinc oxide film grown on a polycrystalline AlN thin film based on a surface acoustic wave. Sens Actuators B Chem 150(2):681–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kale A, Brusa RS, Miotello A (2012) Structural and electrical properties of AlN films deposited using reactive RF magnetron sputtering for solar concentrator application. Appl Surf Sci 258(8):3450–3454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phan DT, Chung GS (2011) The effect of geometry and post-annealing on surface acoustic wave characteristics of AlN thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering. Appl Surf Sci 257(20):8696–8701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Claudel A, Blanquet E, Chaussende D, Boichot R, Doisneau B, Berthomé G, Crisci A, Mank H, Moisson C, Pique D, Pons M (2011) Investigation on AlN epitaxial growth and related etching phenomenon at high temperature using high temperature chemical vapor deposition process. J Cryst Growth 335(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stan GE, Botea M, Boni GA, Pintilie I, Pintilie L (2015) Electric and pyroelectric properties of AlN thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering on Si substrate. Appl Surf Sci 353:1195–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu B, Gao J, Wu KM, Liu C (2009) Preparation and rapid thermal annealing of AlN thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Solid State Commun 149:715–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacquot A, Lenoir B, Dauscher A, Verardi P, Cracium F, Stolzer M, Gartner M, Dinescu M (2002) Optical and thermal characterization of AlN thin films deposited by pulsed laser deposition. Appl Surf Sci 186:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kar JP, Bose G, Tuli S (2005) Influence of rapid thermal annealing on morphological and electrical properties of RF sputtered AlN films. Mater Sci Semicond Process 8(6):646–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vergara L, Olivares J, Iborra E, Clement M, Sanz-Hervás A, Sangrador J (2006) Effect of rapid thermal annealing on the crystal quality and the piezoelectric response of polycrystalline AlN films. Thin Solid Films 515(4):1814–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee E, Ruirui Z, Yoon G (2011) Nitrogen [N]-incorporated ZnO piezoelectric thin films and their application for ultra-small film bulk acoustic wave resonator device fabrication. J Appl Phys 110:074101–074101.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin CH, Yamashita Y, Miyake H, Hiramatsu K (2017) Fabrication of high-crystallinity a-plane AlN films grown on r-plane sapphire substrates by modulating buffer-layer growth temperature and thermal annealing conditions. J Cryst Growth 468:845–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jo M, Itokazu Y, Kuwaba S, Hirayama H (2019) Improved crystal quality of semipolar AlN by employing a thermal annealing technique with MOVPE. J Cryst Growth 507:307–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ababneh A, Schmid U, Hernando J, Sánchez-Rojas JL, Seidel H (2010) The influence of sputter deposition parameters on piezoelectric and mechanical properties of AlN thin films. Mater Sci Eng B 172(3):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin HK, Cheng KC, Huang JC (2015) Effects of laser annealing parameters on optical and electrical properties of ITO/metallic glass alloy Bi-layer films. Nanoscale Res Lett 10(1):982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sadrnezhaad SK, Yasavol N, Ganjali M, Sanjabi S (2012) Property change during nanosecond pulse laser annealing of amorphous NiTi thin fil. Bull Mater Sci 35:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng CC, Lin RC, Lin HK, Kao KS, Chen YC (2016) Frequency modulation and device repaired by laser surface treatment in film bulk acoustic filters. J Laser Micro/Nanoeng 11(1):13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. K. Lin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Y. J. Huang
    • 1
  • W. C. Shih
    • 2
  • Y. C. Chen
    • 2
  • W. T. Chang
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Materials EngineeringNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyPingtungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational Sun Yat-Sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  3. 3.Metal Industries Research & Development CentreKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations