The model of local axon homeostasis - explaining the role and regulation of microtubule bundles in axon maintenance and pathology
Axons are the slender, cable-like, up to meter-long projections of neurons that electrically wire our brains and bodies. In spite of their challenging morphology, they usually need to be maintained for an organism's lifetime. This makes them key lesion sites in pathological processes of ageing, injury and neurodegeneration. The morphology and physiology of axons crucially depends on the parallel bundles of microtubules (MTs), running all along to serve as their structural backbones and highways for life-sustaining cargo transport and organelle dynamics. Understanding how these bundles are formed and then maintained will provide important explanations for axon biology and pathology. Currently, much is known about MTs and the proteins that bind and regulate them, but very little about how these factors functionally integrate to regulate axon biology. As an attempt to bridge between molecular mechanisms and their cellular relevance, we explain here the model of local axon homeostasis, based on our own experiments in Drosophila and published data primarily from vertebrates/mammals as well as C. elegans. The model proposes that (1) the physical forces imposed by motor protein-driven transport and dynamics in the confined axonal space, are a life-sustaining necessity, but pose a strong bias for MT bundles to become disorganised. (2) To counterbalance this risk, MT-binding and -regulating proteins of different classes work together to maintain and protect MT bundles as necessary transport highways. Loss of balance between these two fundamental processes can explain the development of axonopathies, in particular those linking to MT-regulating proteins, motors and transport defects. With this perspective in mind, we hope that more researchers incorporate MTs into their work, thus enhancing our chances of deciphering the complex regulatory networks that underpin axon biology and pathology.
KeywordsDrosophila neurodegeneration axons actin cytoskeleton microtubules
ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities
Actin cross-linking factor 7
Adenomatous polyposis coli
Calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein
type 1 congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles
End binding protein 1
Exchange factor for ARF6
ɣ-tubulin ring complex
type 6 hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy
induced pluripotent stem cell
Kinesin heavy chain
Kinesin family member
Kinesin light chain
Microtubule inner proteins
Microtubule elimination domain
MT organising centres
Plakin repeat region
Reactive oxygen species
Spastin-linked spastic paraplegia
Stimulated emission depletion
Axons are the slender, cable-like extensions of nerve cells which form the nerves and nerve tracts that wire our brain and body, sending neuronal messages in highly regulated manners. With diameters of only 0.1-15μm , they extend over distances of up to a meter in humans. To adopt such a unique morphology and physiology, axons display many specialised features (Fig. 1).
Axons are indispensable for nervous system function, as illustrated by paralysis in spinal cord injury caused by the interruption of ascending and descending axon tracts [2, 3]. Axons are key lesion sites in injury-induced trauma and coma [4, 5, 6, 7], and axon decay is believed to be an important trigger for neuronal decay in ageing and many neurodegenerative disorders [8, 9]. Notably, most neurons cannot be replaced, and compensation of lost axons through collateral branching of intact neighbouring axons has obvious limitations [9, 10].
This means that most axons have to be maintained for an organism's life time, i.e. up to a century in humans; unsurprisingly, mammals tend to lose almost half their axon mass towards high age [11, 12]. This trend is severely enhanced in neurodegenerative disorders, as illustrated by gradually increasing paralysis in spastic paraplegia or motorneuron disease [13, 14].
Research into neurodegenerative disorders typically approaches the problem by describing observed phenotypes and unravelling the molecular mechanisms performed by proteins linked to the disease. However, this approach rarely leads to satisfactory explanations of the pathology . We believe that more profound understanding will arise when widening the scope from molecular to cellular mechanisms, by studying how proteins work within regulatory networks to underpin observable processes of axon biology - thus performing investigations at the same level of complexity at which pathology becomes manifest. Here we will illustrate this approach by focussing on the axonal cytoskeleton.
The importance of microtubule bundles for axon biology
Of the three cytoskeleton classes, intermediate filaments were suggested by anatomical, developmental and genetic studies to regulate axon diameters, and their axonal aggregation is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases [1, 27, 28, 29, 30]. However, intermediate filament aggregations are not necessarily the cause, but can be the consequence of axon decay [30, 31, 32]. Notably, Neurofilament-H-lacZ mutant mice or Quiver mutant quail completely lack axonal intermediate filaments, but develop and breed fairly normally [33, 34]. Furthermore, various arthropods form axons of defined diameters in the absence of any axonal intermediate filaments [35, 36, 37]. In contrast to the moderate roles of intermediate filaments, actin and microtubules (MT) are essential for all stages of neuronal development and maintenance [37, 38, 39]. This review will be dedicated to the role and regulation of MTs.
Roles of axonal MT bundles
(1) Axonal MT bundles serve as structural backbones, not dissimilar to the vertebral column of a snake. Since MTs in these bundles are discontinuous and expected to be interlinked via flexible connections (see Section on cross-linkers), they are ideally suited to respond to longitudinal stretch and compression (similar to a half-extended telescope ladder), but also to torsion and flexure (Fig. 2).
(2) Axonal MT bundles provide the highways for life-sustaining axonal transport between cell bodies and the axonal compartment. This transport is driven anterogradely by kinesins and retrogradely by the dynein/Dynactin complex; the cargoes include mRNAs, cytoplasmic proteins including signalling factors, vesicles delivering synaptic proteins, transmembrane proteins, neuropeptides and/or membrane lipids, as well as entire organelles including mitochondria (Fig. 3a-d [40–44]). Furthermore, local dynamics of organelles, such as fission or fusion of mitochondria, can be expected to require forces generated by MT-associated motor proteins (Fig. 3e ).
(3) Axonal MT bundles provide a source for readily available MTs that can be used for other purposes (curved arrows in Fig. 1); for example, splaying MTs can trigger axon extension processes in growth cones [26, 46, 47], induce branching through growth cone splitting  or collateral branch formation along the axon shaft [49–51], as well as support physiological changes at synapses .
From work in Drosophila to the integrated model of local axon homeostasis
Why use Drosophila?
The use of Drosophila neurons to study the neuronal cytoskeleton has a number of advantages that were detailed elsewhere . Key aspects are the high degree of evolutionary conservation of cytoskeletal proteins, regulators and dynamics, the experimental amenability of neurons in primary cell culture and in vivo [46, 77, 78], and the relative ease of genetic manipulation based on available resources and efficient combinatorial genetics . The power of combinatorial genetics is rooted in the relative ease, speed and cost effectiveness with which genes can be manipulated and functionally analysed, facilitating also combined analyses of multiple factors in the same animals or cells [46, 70, 80]. Drosophila's combinatorial genetics has been extremely successful in overcoming problems of redundancy, and in generating new conceptual understanding of co-operative networks of neuronal MT regulation that underlie phenomena at the cellular level (see main text). This has similarly been demonstrated for C. elegans [81–83]. Such depth of understanding at the cellular level can hardly be achieved through isolated work on individual genetic factors.
As an attempt to explain the occurrence of this MT phenotype across mutant conditions and animal groups, we developed the model of 'local axon homeostasis' [37, 89], based on two fundamental elements:
(1) The model proposes that MTs in axons show a strong bias to become disorganised and curl up. As detailed further below, this is most likely induced by the force-generating motor proteins that drive transport of large cargoes in the narrow axonal environment crowded with physical obstacles posed by organelles and protein complexes (Fig. 1, 'A-E' in Fig. 3). Once MT disorganisation occurs, e.g. through off-track polymerisation or buckling ('4' and 'd' in Fig. 3), it can form a seed that gradually develops into pathological axon swellings.
(2) The model further proposes that this risk is contained through the actions of different classes of MT-associating and -regulating proteins, which co-operate and complement each other to form robust machinery that 'tames' MTs into bundles ('1-17' in Fig. 3).
In this model, each axon segment uses locally acting MT regulators to maintain its MT bundles (hence 'local axon homeostasis'). Hereditary or acquired loss of single regulators would be expected to weaken this machinery and increase the statistical risk of MT disorganisation. Such heightened probability might explain why many axonopathies affect primarily long axons , and why certain disorders linked to MT regulators display late onset of axon decay .
In the next two sections, we discuss potential causes explaining the bias of axonal MTs to become disorganised. We will then summarise experimentally demonstrated MT bundle-maintaining mechanisms, and speculate about further mechanisms based on existing knowledge of known classes of axonal MT-regulating proteins.
Understanding the unusual curling behaviours of MTs in axons
Furthermore, MTs are structurally active: their physical properties can change when proteins bind to them (e.g. kinesins, see below) or when the 'tubulin code' is altered. The tubulin code is determined by the incorporation of different existing isotypes of α- and ß-tubulin into the MT lattice, and the addition of a range of distinct post-translational modifications (Fig. 6b [103, 104, 105, 106]). Some modifications influence the interaction with MT-binding proteins (e.g. poly-glutamylation attracts spastin and tau [107, 108]). Others are believed to structurally protect MTs from damage or depolymerisation: for example, poly-aminations on various residues stabilises against depolymerisation , or acetylation of luminal lysine 40 makes MTs more flexible and break-resistant (Fig. 6b; [110, 111, 112, 113, 114]). Notably, site-directed mutation of lysine 40 in Drosophila α1-tubulin was able to demonstrate that intraluminal MT acetylation is physiologically relevant [115, 116]. In addition, the MT lumen may contain MIPs (MT inner proteins) that likely also modify MT stability .
These intrinsic or acquired physical properties are likely to determine how MTs respond to external forces - and we can expect such forces to be highly enriched in axons (see next section). Some ideas about how forces may impact on axonal MTs can be derived from in vitro experiments. For example, MTs in flow chambers that are anchored at one end, will bend when applying flow and rapidly return to straight confirmation when flow is stopped; if certain shaft-binding proteins (e.g. doublecortin or non-motile kinesin-1) are added, MTs become locked in bent conformation and fail to re-straighten [118, 119, 120].
MT loop or spool formation in gliding assays under different conditions. Footnotes: a) Primarily the lower range of mentioned diameters is listed; b) not clear from experimental section; c) measured from images. Abbreviations: CW, clockwise; CCW, counter-clockwise; polym, polymerisation; SA, streptavidin; tub, tubulin. References: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , (5) , (6) , (7) , (8) , (9) , (10) , (11) , (12) . Note that a number of mathematical models were put forward to describe loop or spool dynamics in gliding assays [141, 156, 157, 414, 416, 417]
diameters of curvature [μm] a
standard tub, 10-20 μm taxol (after?) b polym.
waves and curls upon pinning
standard tub, 50 μM taxol during & after polym.; high MT density (2.5 MTs/μm2)
loops form through collision; loop duration frequently >5 min; strong increase in loops at high MT concentration; decreasing loop radius with increasing contour
rhodamine-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; exposing to air bubble or n-heptane
1.1 (heptane), 1.8 (air)
MTs become reversibly unstable in non-polar conditions: 50% of MTs form loops as long as close to air bubble; effect absolutely requires kinesins
rhodamine-tub, 10 μM taxol after polym.
left-handed supertwist favours CCW rotation of loops; CCW rotation is preserved in spools
biotin-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked
1-12.6, mean 3.9
biotin-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked
1-5, mean 2.3
up to 25 μm long straight bundles; pinning of tip induces spools or fishtailing; occasional “unspooling” events
biotin-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked; 1600, 870, 270 and 90 kinesins/μm2
highest spool density & lowest spool diameter @ highest kinesin density; pinning as main cause for spool formation
biotin-GTP-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked
5.7 (@ 10.8 μm length), 3 (@ 3,7 μm)
spool diameters increase with MT length per condition; spool diameters: GMP-MTs (taxol) < GMPCPP-MTs (no taxol) < GMPCPP-MTs (taxol)
biotin-GMPCPP-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked
18.8 (@ 10.3 μm length), 5.8 (@ 3.4 μm)
biotin-GMPCPP-tub, no taxol; SA-linked
8.2 (@ 10 μm length), 4.3 (@ 3.4 μm)
biotin-GTP-tub, 10 μm taxol (after?)b polym.; SA-linked
3.2 μm (@ 6μm length)
live imaging: pinning & collisions (simultaneous sticking) cause spool formation; spool formation is not activated by a Brownian ratchet type process
biotin-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-linked; microfluidic device
2.7 (pinning), 6.2 (collisions)
live imaging: pinning & collisions (simultaneous sticking) cause spools of different diameters; pinning more frequent in flow cells than microfluidic device
biotin-tub, (taxol?)b polym.; SA-quantum dot-linked
1.2, mean 3.4
left/right-handed super-twist: CCW/CW rotation; rings form intertwined wreath-like structures; tendency to disassemble involving MT breakage, kinesins pulling (blocked by AMP-PNP), counteracted by SA (enhanced by biotin)
biotin-tub, 10 μm taxol after polym.; SA-quantum dot-linked; patterned kinesin carpets
1-5.3 and 3.1
smallest spool diameters on constrained carpets: 1-5.3 μm on 5 μm stripes, 3.1 μm on 2 μm wide squares
axonemal dynein carpet
Cy3-tub, 10μM taxol
forming vortices in mm range
If MTs on kinesin carpets are reversibly cross-linked with biotin-streptavidin, they coalesce into bundles containing dozens of MTs which frequently curl up into spools with inner diameters similar to those of loops (details in Table 3). Spools can take on similar appearances as looped MT bundles observed in growth cones of fly or mammalian neurons [77, 130, 131]. Furthermore, single MTs can escape from spools which may trigger spool disassembly [130, 132, 133], bearing some resemblance with off-track MTs leaving axonal bundles ('4' in Fig. 3).
Parameters known to influence loops and spools in vitro might provide mechanistic insights into similar behaviours of MTs in axons (details in Table 3). Firstly, loop formation is favoured by high density of MTs and/or kinesins [134, 135], i.e. conditions that are clearly given in axons. Potential explanations are offered by reports that kinesins directly impact on the structural properties of MTs (see below), but they can also cause pinning events in gliding assays, which could be seen as a potential proxy for the abundant obstacles faced by extending or sliding MTs in the narrow axons. Secondly, higher MT rigidity results in larger diameter curls and spools in gliding assays . Thirdly, right- versus left-handed supertwist of the MTs involved in gliding assays determines whether curls and spools have a clockwise or counter-clockwise directionality (Fig. 6d; [132, 137]). Furthermore, exposure to non-polar interfaces (e.g. n-heptane or air bubbles) induces strong curling , and this may be relevant in axons: changes in physical and chemical parameters of neurons upon ageing or in degenerative diseases promote liquid-liquid phase separation ; liquid compartments likely are of low polarity  and might therefore influence the curling bias of MTs. All these parameters observed in vitro can be expected to apply also in axons and might contribute to the observed curling behaviours (Fig. 5).
MT loops in gliding assays can be surprisingly stable (frequently >5 mins, as reported in ). To explain this, it has been proposed that tubulin-heterodimers on the concave side of the tube take on a shorter conformation than those on the convex side, and that this asymmetric distribution can be maintained as an energetically favoured state (Fig. 6f, bottom right ). Conformational length variations underlying this model were observed in non-hydrolysed GMPCPP-MTs where tubulins are 1-3% longer than hydrolysed GDP-tubulin; taxol added after (but not during) polymerisation achieves a similar elongation (Fig. 6f; [142, 143, 144, 145, 146]). Notably, this conformational length change seems physiologically relevant, as its suppression by the T238A mutation in yeast ß-tubulin stabilises MTs in vivo and causes mitotic defects [147, 148].
Such intrinsic properties of MTs may contribute to MT curling in axons, further influenced by MT lattice-associating proteins, such as tau, doublecortin or kinesin-1 which were reported to bind differently to curved versus straight MTs [118, 119, 120, 149, 150, 151]. In particular kinesins-1 was shown to extend MT lattices to similar degrees as taxol  through mechanisms that involve local compaction of tubulin different from taxol- or GMPCPP-induced effects [152, 153]. Since kinesin-1 has a preference for convex MT surfaces and was reported to undergo cooperative binding, this may lead to a curvature-enhancing and -stabilising snowball effect with an estimated diameter of curvature of 3.2 μm [120, 154, 155]. In this way, kinesin carpets in gliding assays might induce stable yet reversible curling, as has been suggested by mathematical modelling (top right in Fig. 6f, [156, 157]).
Naturally, current models are in their infancy and further findings need to be incorporated. For example, MTs behave as elastic cylinders (comparable to a garden hose) and can undergo softening through cross-sectional flattening when strongly bent (Fig. 6e [158, 159]). In this same vein, conformational changes of MTs upon kinesin-1 binding were reported to soften MTs locally . If confirmed, this would have important implications for any existing models; together with the kinesin-induced tubulin compaction (yellow asterisks in Fig. 6f), it might be a mechanism to absorb energy and reduce the shear force load on MTs. Notably, softening of MTs is also observed upon taxol application (usually used in gliding assays; Table 3 ) or MT acetylation (abundant in axons [111, 114]), and might be a common prerequisite for curling behaviours.
To conclude, loop and spool formation in gliding assays are considered processes of 'active self-organisation' . We strongly feel that this term might apply also to the formation of MT disorganisation in axons, and that potential mechanisms underlying MT curling in axons can be learned from in vitro assays. Notably, motor proteins, in particular kinesins, are being highlighted as key factors in both gliding and flow chamber assays. In the next section we will therefore summarise roles of kinesins during axon pathology.
The intricate relationship between MTs and their associated motor proteins
Several kinesins display direct roles in MT regulation : they may promote MT polymerisation (kinesin-2, -5 [162, 163, 164]), drive MT depolymerisation (kinesin-8, -13 ), stabilise MT-minus ends (kinesin-14 ), cross-link MTs (kinesin-5, -6, -12; see section on bundling), and regulate MT orientation as a feature of neuronal polarity [167, 168, 169].
However, in axons most attention is usually given to cargo and organelle transport/dynamics (Fig. 3a-e; see section on axonal cytoskeleton) driven retrogradely by the minus end-directed dynein/Dynactin complex, and anterogradely by plus-end directed kinesins (primarily kinesin-1, -2, and -3 [40, 170]). The forces imposed by these dynamics and/or the size of cargoes moved in the constrained environment of axons rich in physical obstacles, poses an obvious challenge to MT bundles  and might be an important factor leading to MT disorganisation.
Clearly, there is an intricate mutual regulatory relationship and finely tuned balance between the amount of transport and the structural properties of MT bundles as the transport highways [23, 171]. Thus, MT bundle properties influence transport: firstly, MT density is higher in small calibre axons than in large axons, with MT numbers and densities ranging to enormous degrees (4-130 MTs per axon, ~4-150 MTs/μm2); correlative studies and mathematical modelling suggest that higher MT numbers promote axonal transport ([172, 173, 174] and references therein). How MT numbers are so precisely controlled is an important but entirely unresolved issue that likely involves the nucleation machinery (see section on nucleation/polymerisation). Secondly, MT length correlates with transport rates . Thirdly, the tubulin isotype composition of MTs, their posttranslational modifications, and the physical presence of certain MT-binding proteins influence motor protein dynamics ('a' in Fig. 3; [149, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180]).
Vice versa, transport affects MT bundles: for example, binding of kinesin changes the physical properties of MTs (see previous section), and binding and buckling through motor proteins cause damage to the MTs they walk on, triggering maintenance responses including MT repair or potentially even replacement ('14' in Fig. 3; [120, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185]). Close links between MT organisation and transport are also illustrated by charge-changing mutations in the H12 helix of C. elegans α-tubulin, reported to impact on axon transport whilst causing MT bundle aberrations .
Tipping the balance in this mutual relationship can easily be imagined to cause reciprocal deficiencies in transport rate and MT bundle organisation. For example, disorganisation or partial breakage of MTs has been reported to cause pathological transport deficits (option '1' in Fig. 4; [7, 67]). Furthermore, the space required for large cargo movements is likely generated through dynamic rearrangements of local MT-MT crosslinking networks (see section on cross-linkage); in this scenario, deviating from the right amount of cross-linkers may be a path to bundle aberration. Vice versa, demyelination upon immunological lesioning [186, 187], was reported to initially cause transport defects, which were then followed by MT disorganisation ('2' in Fig. 4; ). Analogously, we observe that loss of certain transport kinesins (Kinesin heavy chain/Khc/Kif5A or B, Unc-104/Kif1A) causes severe MT disorganisation in Drosophila primary neurons (Y.T.L. and A.V., unpublished data; Khc shown in Fig. 5e).
How loss of these kinesins may cause MT disorganisation can currently only be hypothesised. There are potential biomechanical and/or biochemical explanations. For example, it has been reported for dendrites that kinesin-1 migrates on acetylated and kinesin-3 on tyrosinated MTs . Provided the same is true in axons, the loss of kinesin-1 would relieve acetylated MTs, but tyrosinated MTs would still bear their full transport load - and vice versa. Such imbalances in transport distribution within MT bundles could lead to shear forces that buckle MTs and seed MT disorganisation. Similar mechanisms may explain why MT disorganisation was observed at the axon initial segment upon directional changes in motor traffic caused by deficiency of the dynein regulator NDEL1 .
The intricate relationship between MTs and axonal organelles
MTs and cellular organelles display important and complex interdependencies. This becomes immediately apparent when considering that meaningful dynamics of any organelles will depend on MTs and their associated motor proteins (Fig. 3C and D). Vice versa, organelles play crucial roles in cellular physiology directly or indirectly relevant for MTs, as outlined in the following for mitochondria:
(1) Mitochondria are the main source for ATP , required to fuel multiple processes relevant for MT dynamics and regulation (red stippled arrows in Fig. 3); these include actin assembly and dynamics [196, 197], phosphorylation of MT regulators , GTP production required for signalling events and MT polymerisation [37, 199, 200], MT severing , as well as MT-motor protein dynamics (; but note that vesicular transport uses local glycolysis to generate its own ATP; [202, 203]; yellow star in Fig. 3 A).
(3) Mitochondria cooperate with endoplasmic reticulum in the regulation of intracellular free calcium (yellow cloud in Fig. 3; [205, 206]) which has direct impact on MT regulators (e.g. spectraplakins, tau, kinesins [207, 208]; or even on MTs themselves ).
(4) Mitochondria collaborate with peroxisomes in the regulation of reactive oxygen species ('ROS' in Fig. 3; [210, 211]), which have known effects on MT regulation . If excessive amounts of the wrong ROS species are produced upon transport-induced mitochondrial damage or dysregulation of the mitochondria-peroxisome system, this causes oxidative stress as a major path to axon pathology [67, 211, 213]. Causative relationships between MTs and oxidative stress can be demonstrated experimentally: for example the MT-stabilising drug epothilone B rescues pathology caused by oxidative stress caused by peroxisome transport deficiencies in a human iPSC (induced pluripotent stem cell) model of SPG4 (spastin-linked spastic paraplegia 4; ), suggesting that MTs might be the cause for the transport deficit in the first place.
Also other organelles impact on MTs. For example, the endoplasmic reticulum has multiple roles in lipidogenesis and protein synthesis but also calcium homeostasis , and the endo-lysosomal and proteasome-ubiquitination systems are required for proteostasis known to be relevant for MTs and axonal transport [215–217].
Functional interdependencies between transport and MT organisation provide potential explanations for a number of observations. For example, they may explain why axonal swellings induced by senile plaques in the Tg-swAPPPrp mouse (overexpressing an amyloid precursor protein carrying a familial Alzheimer's disease-linked mutation ) were strongly enhanced when removing one copy of the KLC1 gene (kinesin light chain; a linker required for kinesin-1 mediated veciscular transport) - and this effect is conserved in Drosophila . They may explain why different types of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or hereditary spastic paraplegias can be caused through motor proteins as well as regulators of membranous compartments [191, 192]. They may also explain why MT-stabilising drugs can be beneficial in animal models of neurodegeneration as diverse as SPG4 (Table 4) and Alzheimer's disease [193, 194].
Naturally, the argumentative framework presented here is highly speculative, given the enormous complexity of the relationships between MT bundle organisation, motor protein activity and organelle-dependent systemic factors. But we hope that these reflections will motivate experimenters to have a closer look at MTs in future studies of axon biology and pathology, and include statements in their reports as to whether MTs are affected. More data are urgently needed, which does often not require more than analysing neuronal morphology with antisera against tubulin (rather than restricting to intermediate filaments), or having a closer look at MTs in ultrastructural studies by increasing the resolution. In the following sections we will explore the mechanisms that are potentially used to form and maintain MT bundles against the odds of motor-induced aberration or damage.
MT nucleation and polymerisation as fundamental requirements for bundle maintenance
The de novo formation of MT bundles during developmental, plastic or regenerative axon growth ('8' in Fig. 3) requires MT nucleation and polymerisation. Also in axons of mature and fully grown neurons, MTs undergo nucleation and polymerisation [37, 218], for example to drive MT repair and/or turn-over in order to maintain a steady state and prevent MT senescence ('14' in Fig. 1; [183, 184]). A well-regulated machinery of MT nucleation/polymerisation and disassembly is therefore needed to keep the numbers of healthy axonal MTs in balance with the transport load (see previous section; ).
Mechanisms of MT nucleation have long been known to be independent of centrosomes [219, 220] and should therefore involve cytoplasmic assembly or non-centrosomal MTOCs (MT organising centres; [221, 222]). For example, tau was reported to form condensations on MTs in vitro [179, 180], and such condensed phases of tau could theoretically have nucleation capacity [223, 224]. Furthermore, new MTs could arise from MT fragments (see Section on severing proteins below), potentially anchored via CAMSAP (calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein)/Patronin to polymerise in the accurate direction towards the axon tip [113, 225]. Best demonstrated so far are mechanisms dependent on ɣTuRC (ɣ-tubulin ring complexes) and their anchorage via augmin/HAUS complexes to MTs ('17' in Fig. 3): depletion of either ɣ-tubulin or different HAUS proteins causes severe axon shortening and reduction in MT density; in addition, HAUS depletion causes polarity defects reflected in frequent MT polymerisation events towards the soma [226, 227, 228], suggesting that regulated nucleation is doubly important for axonal MT bundle maintenance. As the underlying mechanism it has been proposed that the augmin/HAUS complex anchors ɣTuRC to other MTs and points them distally ('17' in Fig. 3), and such a view is consistent with live imaging in Drosophila S2 cells .
The machinery of MT de-/polymerisation (blue stippled arrows in Fig. 3) requires at least three sub-machineries : (1) dynamic protein complexes at the MT plus end that directly regulate polymerisation (blue balls, 'Eb1' in Fig. 3); (2) a complex regulatory network that supplies mature α/β-tubulin heterodimers as building blocks and that is closely co-regulated with MT dynamics ('B' in Fig. 3; [230, 231, 232]); (3) proteins binding or post-translationally modifying MT lattices that have impact on plus end dynamics, for example by stabilising MTs against depolymerisation or by promoting rescue ('7' in 'Fig. 3).
Biomechanical models of axon growth
The net rate of axonal growth has been proposed to be regulated through a balance between MT- and actin-dependent forces [47, 240, 241]. In axons, “actin is under tension supported in part by microtubules under compression” [234, 242]. Tension is provided by the pull of the growth cone [243–245] and the active contraction of acto-myosin, potentially the actin rings in the axon shaft (Fig. 1; [241, 246]; the stiff nature of cross-linked MT bundles is well suited to oppose compressive forces up to a certain threshold ([240, 247]; Fig. 2).
In such a balanced system, manipulations such as externally imposed pulling forces [248–251] or genetic/pharmacological destabilisation of acto-myosin [234, 235, 252–255] clearly modulate axon length or growth. Part of this response is expected to be due to changes in MT assembly, as was found when applying external forces to non-neuronal cells . MTs are not only responders in this context, but can generate forces themselves through dis-/assembly or motor-based sliding [91, 252, 257, 258].
How forces are sensed and translated into compensatory force generation and/or changes in axonal length or growth, remains an important question (see also the last section on cortical anchorage). Potential mechano-responsive mechanisms might involve conformational changes of MTs (single MTs polymerise faster when being pulled in vitro) or changes in the activity status of polymerases such as XMap215 [91, 259]. Furthermore, good experimental support exists for roles of mechano-sensitive calcium channels in axon growth control [260–262] and it remains to be seen whether this occurs through changing MT assembly/disassembly processes.
Maintaining MT bundles through cortical guidance and elimination of polymerising MTs
Whilst MT nucleation and polymerisation are essential for axon formation and maintenance, they also pose a risk: for example, extending MTs may be obstructed by the abundant organelles or protein complexes in axons, thus causing accidental 'off-track' MTs that project out of the bundle towards the cortex ('4' in Fig. 3). Apart from MT buckling, off-track MTs may therefore be a second cause for axonal MT disorganisation.
A key factor preventing this from happening is Eb1 (end binding protein 1; Figs. 3 and 5b; ). Eb1 directly binds at extending MT plus ends where it promotes polymerisation  and serves as a scaffold for many other proteins . Upon absence of Eb1 in Drosophila primary neurons, MTs are severely disorganised, indicating important roles in MT bundle maintenance (Fig. 5B ). One underlying mechanism is the guidance of polymerising MTs through binding of Eb1 to Short stop (Shot); Shot is a well-conserved spectraplakin, able to cross-link cortical actin, MTs and Eb1 ('5' in Fig. 3), thus guiding polymerising MTs in parallel to the axonal surface and laying them out into parallel bundles . Accordingly, also loss of Shot causes severe MT disorganisation in fly axons (Fig. 5e) - and the same is true for functional loss of its two mammalian homologues ACF7 and dystonin in culture and in vivo [57, 59, 87, 90]. Of these, dystonin mutations link to the axonopathy HSAN6 (type 6 hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy ).
Cortical guidance is complemented by at least one quality control mechanism : MTs that have (accidentally) left their bundled arrangements and extend towards the cortex in Drosophila neurons, get inhibited by Efa6 (exchange factor for ARF6; '4' in Fig. 3). Efa6 is a cortical collapse factor that associates with the axonal membrane via its C-terminal plekstrin homology domain and blocks MT polymerisation via its N-terminal MTED (MT elimination domain); when Efa6 is absent, off-track MTs outside axonal MT bundles persist for longer and are higher in number. Consistent with the known roles of off-track MTs in axon growth, branching and MT disorganisation (see Table 1 and above), fly neurons in culture and in vivo lacking Efa6 display longer axons, more branches and prominent MT disorganisation (Fig. 5d ).
Our model would predict that mutant phenotypes caused by loss of Shot and Efa6 should enhance each other because they are caused through complementary mechanisms of MT bundle regulation. Accordingly, we found enhanced MT disorganisation when removing both Shot and Efa6, and over-expression of Shot could rescue Efa6 mutant phenotypes . We propose therefore that Shot and Eb1 keep MTs away from the membrane, whereas Efa6 acts as a quality control factor inhibiting occasional accidental off-track MTs. This elimination seems to occur in moderate, well-balanced amounts so that 'intended' off-track MTs required for axon growth and branching can persist and perform their function.
Interestingly, the cortical collapse function of fly Efa6 is not conserved in vertebrates . Nevertheless, the concepts derived from Efa6 studies appear relevant, because loss of the unrelated neuronal cortical collapse factor KIF21A (kinesin family member 21A; a type 4 kinesin) causes analogous phenotypes in mammalian neurons. Thus, KIF21A mutations linked to the neurodevelopmental disorder CFEOM1 (type 1 congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles) affect axon growth and axonal branching just like Efa6 [74, 263] - and might as well cause MT disorganisation, but no data are currently available.
However, guidance along cortical actin seems not the only mechanism through which Eb1 and Shot keep MTs on track. This is illustrated by the simple fact that MT disorganisation observed upon loss of Shot or Eb1 in primary fly neurons (Fig. 5b, e) does not occur when removing actin from axon shafts [21, 75, 77]. This suggests that both factors perform additional, actin-independent functions or interactions to promote MT bundles.
For example, the unusual Shot-PH isoform, which is highly enriched in the nervous system and harbours a plakin repeat region (PRR; conserved in mammalian spectraplakins), is a likely candidate for such roles that still await investigation ('11' in Fig. 3; [79, 90]). Apart from spectraplakins, Eb proteins have a long list of further interactors , and some of them might associate with MTs and guide extending plus ends along pre-existing bundles ('9' in Fig. 3); for example, APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) or GAS2-LIKE family members are good candidates, known to bind both MTs and Eb1 in mammals and Drosophila [264, 265, 266]. In this context, Eb1-APC-kinesin complexes were already suggested to contribute to MT guidance [169, 267]. Furthermore, MT guidance through septins might offer new explanations for axonal growth defects observed upon septin deficiencies [268, 269, 270].
Potential roles of severing proteins and MT-destabilising kinesins in MT bundle maintenance
Apart from cortical MT elimination, also MT severing and/or depolymerisation in the cytoplasm may play important roles in maintaining axonal MT bundles. This is supported by axonal MT disorganisation observed upon the losses of Drosophila katanin (Y.T.L., unpublished results) or mammalian spastin [62, 63, 64, 65].
As explained in the previous section, MTs leaving the bundled conformation can drive axonal growth, branching and MT disorganisation, and cortical collapse factors negatively regulate all three processes. In line with this argumentation, also Kif2A (a MT-depolymerising kinesin-13 family member; ) and MT severing proteins (spastin, katanin and fidgetin) were reported to inhibit neurite growth and/or branching [272, 273, 274]. However, other studies of spastin, katanin and fidgetin led to contradictory findings, describing them as promoters rather than inhibitors of neurite growth and branching [63, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282]. Such stark, potentially context-dependent deviations reflect the complex regulation of these proteins.
Spastin, katanin and fidgetin are all members of the superfamily of AAA proteins (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities; [201, 283, 284]), but their severing activity is differentially regulated through their individual responses to (a) posttranslational MT modifications (in particular acetylation and poly-glutamylation; [107, 274, 285, 286, 287, 288]), (b) competition with other MT shaft-binding proteins such as tau ('15' in Fig. 3; [275, 289, 290]), or (c) spatial recruitment through specifically localised proteins such as CAMSAP ('13' in Fig. 3 ). Furthermore, katanin has the ability to depolymerise MTs in an ATP-independent manner .
Through this context-dependent spatiotemporal regulation of their activities, severing proteins can have two diametrically opposed outcomes: they either eliminate MTs, or they break them up into stable fragments that may serve as seeds for MT amplification [113, 201, 293]. In the following, we will briefly speculate how either of these outcomes could be used to prevent MT disorganisation:
First, MT severing proteins could complement roles of cortical collapse factors ('4' in Fig. 3) by serving as quality control factors that eliminate disorganised MTs within the cytoplasm ('6' in Fig. 3). For example, katanin in plant cells was reported to localise and sever preferentially at MT cross-points, which can be used to take out non-aligned MTs .
Second, MT shortening functions of katanin are required at MT minus ends. Thus, in both mammals and Drosophila, the minus-end capper CAMSAP/Patronin protects against MT disassembly, and recruits katanin to counterbalance against uncontrolled minus-end polymerisation ('13' in Fig. 3; [225, 291, 294]); uncontrolled minus end extension upon katanin deficiency may cause MTs to go off-track or potentially buckle through extra forces produced. Note that CAMSAP3 also plays roles in maintaining non-acetylated MTs, thus further complicating interpretations .
Third, MT elimination functions could prevent MT bundle senescence. For example, MTs suffer from damage through tear-and-wear [120, 181, 182, 183, 185], which might cause bundle aberration by abrogating interactions with MT-binding proteins (red cross at '16' in Fig. 3). MT fractures or holes can be repaired through mechanisms involving katanin or spastin [183, 232, 293, 296, 297]. However, more subtle features of senescence (e.g. irreversible modifications, loss of tubulin C-tails) might require selective elimination of ageing MTs through severing factors (as similarly suggested for kinesin-8 or -13 ) which could then trigger compensatory polymerisation ('14' in Fig. 3). For example, spastin deficiency in the SpΔ mouse model caused a drop in MT polymerisation (potentially reflecting reduced turn-over) accompanied by a rise in MT disorganisation (potentially caused by precocious MT senescence; ).
However, the MT phenotypes observed in the SpΔ mouse model could likewise be explained through the opposite role of spastin in promoting MT multiplication through generating nucleation seeds: in the absence of such a function, MT numbers might gradually decline and cause transport interruptions and eventually axonal pathology (see section on motor proteins; [214, 299]). Curiously, axon swellings in the SpΔ mouse model were reduced with low doses of MT-stabilising or -destabilising drugs , thus failing to provide any clues as to whether spastin works through MT turn-over or amplification in this context.
Understanding spastin is important because it is by far the most prominent factor linking to spastic paraplegias worldwide [300, 301], and axonal swellings are a hallmark of the disease [192, 302]. Most SPG4-linked mutations lie within the AAA-ATPase domain , suggesting that MT severing is key to the disease pathology. However, point mutations might generate versions of spastin, which either act as dominant negative alleles (forming dysfunctional complexes that titrate out other spastin-interacting factors), or acquire gain-of-function qualities by diffusing away to perform very different roles. One such MT-independent role of spastin is the isoform-specific regulation of the endoplasmic reticulum ('e' in Fig. 3), including its shape, its interaction with the endosome and its production of lipid droplets [304, 305, 306, 307]. It is therefore difficult to exclude that at least part of those SPG4-linked mutations triggers axon decay through other routes than the direct induction of MT aberrations ('2' or '3' versus '1' in Fig. 4).
Potential roles of MT-MT cross-linkage in MT bundle maintenance
MT-MT cross-linkage appears an obvious means of suppressing MT disorganisation ('12' in Fig. 3) and is likely the oldest mechanistic concept put forward by neurobiologists to explain MT bundles [16, 308, 309]. Mathematical models support MT-MT cross-linkage as an important structural feature of axons (e.g. [310, 311, 312, 313]), and physical cross-linking strands of varying length between axonal MTs were observed decades ago [16, 314]. Such MT-MT cross-linkers would be expected to detach upon super-threshold pull or compression, and re-attach thereafter (Fig. 2; slip-bonds), giving axons properties approximating those of active fluids (K. Miller, personal communication). However, the molecular players mediating MT-MT cross-linkage in axons remain surprisingly controversial to this day , as briefly explained in the following.
First, showing that a neuronal linker expressed in non-neuronal cells induces MT bundling, is insufficient proof: MT bundling can even be achieved through expression of isolated MT-binding domains, or the application of the MT-stabilising drug taxol; intriguingly, taxol-induced bundles display ultrastructural cross-bridges that are indistinguishable from those induced by tau or MAP 2 [308, 316, 317, 318, 319]. As a further example, dynamin is linked to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and has been shown to bundle MTs in vitro; however, the physiological relevance of this is questionable, because dynamin in vivo seems to bind primarily membranes [320, 321, 322].
Second, neurofilaments were reported to fill spaces between MTs especially in larger diameter axons and to form lateral extension that link to MTs around them . However, as mentioned in the second section, lack of neurofilaments is not a lethal condition, suggesting that cross-linking roles of intermediate filaments are not crucial in axons.
Third, MAP 1B appears an ideal cross-linker at first sight, because it possesses an N- and a C-terminal MT-binding domain, but it is not a convincing bundler when expressed in non-neuronal cells  - although the Drosophila homologue Futsch was reported to promote MT spools at synaptic terminals . We are aware of only two reports mentioning axonal bundle defects upon loss of MAP 1B or Futsch [326, 327] and another where loss of Futsch reduces the spacing between axonal MTs . Rather than MT bundle structure, most insights into MAP 1B/Futsch functions concern axon development, which likely reflects its major role [324, 329, 330, 331]. Another candidate with N- and C-terminal MT-binding domains is MTCL1 (microtubule cross-linking factor 1) which displays prominent bundling activity when expressed in non-neuronal cells and is prominently expressed at the AIS (axon initial segment) of cerebellar Purkinje cells [317, 332, 333]. Ultrastructural analyses of a range of neuron types have revealed that MTs at AISs are not distributed throughout the axonal lumen as observed along axon shafts, but are grouped up into parallel sheet-like arrangements cross-linked by ~25nm long spacers ('Axon' chapter in ). In Purkinje cells, these parallel arrangements are affected upon loss of MTCL1, as is in agreement with its proposed role as cross-linker . However, due to its limited expression in the cerebellum, MTCL1 cannot explain similar sheet-like arrangements in the AISs of other neuron types. A more likely candidate is TRIM-46 (tripartite motif-containing protein 46) which is expressed in AISs in many nervous tissues, contains only one central MT-binding domain, can induce sheet-like arrangements when expressed in non-neuronal cells, localises to the cross-bridges, and its knock-down in cultured neurons causes reduced cross-linkage [335, 336].
Fifth, the conserved linker candidate tau, has one central MT-binding region and seems to achieve physical MT-MT linkage through N-terminal dimerisation [337, 338, 339]. However, its dwell time on MTs is very short [150, 340]. Similar to MAP 1B/Futsch, we are aware of only rare reports of fairly mild bundle aberration upon loss of tau [83, 341], and most tau-deficient phenotypes concern neuro-developmental defects instead .
Pinpointing roles of tau or MAP 1B/Futsch in axonal MT-MT cross-linkage is enormously complicated by the fact that both proteins seem to perform a whole array of further molecular functions relevant for MT dynamics. For example, tau can protect MTs from severing by katanin , bind tubulin hetero-dimers , switch between bundled and single MT states , cross-link MTs with actin or the cortex [344, 345, 346, 347], stabilise MTs [315, 348], maintain labile domains along MT shafts [290, 349], regulate end-binding proteins , compete with kinesins or regulate their traffic [179, 180, 351], and promote MT nucleation and polymerisation [331, 352]. A similarly broad functional pleiotropy has been reported for MAP 1B .
Gaining experimental proof for MT-MT cross-linking activities in axons is also complicated by functional redundancies. For example, enhanced phenotypes are observed when mutations of MAP1B and tau or of spectraplakins and tau are combined in the same neurons, or when Futsch and Tau are co-expressed. Such functional redundancies likely extend to further potential cross-linkers. For example, kinesin-5 (KIF11), kinesin-6 (KIF23, Pavarotti in Drosophila) and kinesin-12 (KIF15) slide anti-parallel MTs in the mitotic spindle ; since axonal MTs are arranged in parallel, these kinesins seem therefore to inhibit sliding in this cellular compartment [355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360], suggesting that they cross-link MTs. In support of this idea, we observe that loss of Pavarotti causes axonal MT disorganisation in Drosophila primary neurons which might reflect potential linker function (Y.T.L., unpublished data).
In conclusion, MT-MT cross-linkage is a long proposed concept, but pinpointing the responsible molecular factors in axons remains a key challenge. We seem to have come a step closer at the AIS, but are far from understanding the situation in the axon shaft. We even cannot fully exclude a model where MT bundles are held together by the corset of contractile cortical actin rings (Fig. 1), and cross-linkers merely separate MTs to generate space for transport [241, 309]. It is therefore pivotal to decipher the true molecular nature of MT-MT spacing/cross-linkage in axons; overcoming functional redundancies between different classes of linker candidates might be an important strategy to this end.
Does MT bundle maintenance involve their anchorage to the axonal surface?
Apart from cross-linking MTs within axonal bundles, they might also be anchored to the axon wall, as a further means to prevent MT buckling and bundle deformation caused by the enormous forces imposed by axonal cargo transport. For example, axolinin in squid giant axon has been discussed as a potential MT-cortex linker . Certainly, large ankyrin isoforms can anchor MTs to the cortex at the AIS of mammalian neurons [25, 362, 363] and along axon shafts in Drosophila . In the case of Drosophila it was proposed that MT-cortex linkage through ankyrin combined with spacer function of the MAP 1B homologue Futsch (which contains an unusual central domain of 60 repeats with neurofilament homology ) form networks that sustain a large axon diameter, thus replacing roles of neurofilaments in mammals (see above).
Relevant in this context is the phenomenon of slow (ca. 0.5-5mm/day) somatofugal flow of MTs in developing axons, first observed in 1940 using axonal constrictions  and later confirmed in vertebrates and flies alike [365, 366, 367, 368]. Forces contributing to this process could be derived from an increase in MT volume through polymerisation along the axon shaft , pulling forces in the rear of growth cones , thermal motion of MT-MT cross-linkers , kinesins actively sliding MTs along other MTs ('B' in Fig. 3; ), or dyneins sliding MTs along cortical F-actin ('10' in Fig. 3; [88, 258, 371, 372]).
Potential MT sliding along cortical actin would represent one form of tethering MT bundles to the axonal surface. Such anchorage is also suggested by observed co-drift of the axolemma with the axon core [248, 251, 373]. But anchorage would not have to be static; for example, it might involve an interface of slip-bonds, as similarly suggested for actin networks that flow across, whilst dynamically anchoring to, stable focal adhesion sites . MTs could anchor to cortical actin (Fig. 1; '2' in Fig. 3; ) or to membrane-associated or transmembrane proteins including ion channels, ion transporters or adhesion factors (Fig. 1; '3' in Fig. 3). Links to transmembrane proteins could be used as mechano-sensing modules  that measure local shear forces generated between MT bundles and the axonal environment (Fig. 1). Such mechano-sensing properties could explain local regulation phenomena: for example, net rates of mitochondrial movement along the axon are fairly constant, but the slow transport component (driven by MT bundle flow) is low in proximal and high in distal axon segments; this gradual increase in the amount of slow transport is compensated for by inverse proportional amounts of fast transport (high proximal, low distal ). This well-balanced regional amount of fast mitochondrial transport could potentially be regulated by mechano-sensing, i.e. measuring the local MT drift rate relative to the outer axonal environment in each axon segment.
Apart from dynein (see above), other potential anchoring mechanisms can be deduced from the literature. For example, spectraplakins are good candidates, as suggested by distal shift of axonal MTs in fly neurons lacking the Drosophila spectraplakin Shot and treated with the MT-stabilising drug taxol . Three distinct mechanisms could account for spectraplakin-mediated MT anchorage: Firstly, spectraplakins could directly cross-link actin and MTs ('2' and '5' in Fig. 3). Secondly, they could link to membrane-associated proteins; for example, the mammalian spectraplakin dystonin can link to ß4-integrin and transmembrane collagen XVII ('3' in Fig. 3; ), and Drosophila Shot is able to regulate the axonal localisation of the cell adhesion molecule Fasciclin 2, potentially cross-linking Fasciclin 2 to MT bundles [376, 377]. Thirdly, spectraplakins were shown, in non-neuronal cells of fly and mammals, to anchor MT minus ends to the cortex ('1' in Fig. 3; [225, 378, 379]); this mechanism requires interaction with the MT minus end-stabilising factor CAMSAP/Patronin, a factor that is known to be relevant for neuronal morphology .
Also other MT-binding proteins, such as tau, MAP1B, APC and dynamin, might be involved in anchorage since they were also reported to bind to actin or to the cortex ('2' in Fig. 3; [324, 344, 346, 347, 381, 382, 383, 384]). Potential MT-actin cross-linkage in the axon may not only occur at the cortex, but as well at central longitudinal actin trails (Fig. 1; [17, 24]), thus further contributing to the intricate cross-linking networks expected to stabilise MT bundles. Deciphering MT bundle cross-linkage, internally or with the axonal surface, stays a major challenge for future research, but its understanding will teach us important lessons about axon biology and pathology.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Here we have presented a conceptual view by describing our vision of a functional interactome of cross-regulatory networks acting at the local level in axons. This model sits right at the interface of research into molecular mechanisms and modern bioinformatics approaches of functional network analysis. We propose that there has to be a fine balance between damaging effects inflicted by life-sustaining motor movements ('associated', 'A-E' in Fig. 3) and those factors that maintain the highways required for this movement (MT-'taming' mechanisms; '1-17' in Fig. 3); both are fine-tuned through a number of cross-regulatory mechanisms ('a-e' in Fig. 3).
Our model integrates a broad range of findings from the literature. But its original foundations are derived from our own work in Drosophila neurons, as a consistent cellular system in which it is feasible to study a wide range of genetic factors in parallel and in combination, as a means to understand redundancies, hierarchies and cooperation [46, 70, 72]. This offers unique possibilities to tackle the daunting task of disentangling the enormous complexity of axonal MT bundle regulation. For this, the model of local axon homeostasis could provide a useful basis, helping to develop testable working hypotheses; a good starting point might be to break down the local axon homeostasis machinery into classifiable sub-machineries, like those discussed in the different sections of this review.
This approach also means that we need to recognise the value of incremental long-term approaches that gradually assemble known and newly discovered molecular mechanisms into an integrated understanding of how axon biology is orchestrated at the cellular level, i.e. the organisation level at which axonopathies become manifest. As B.A. Cohen put it: "Research that results in models that reliably and quantitatively predict the outcomes of genetic, biochemical, or pharmacological perturbations should be valued highly, and rewarded, regardless of whether such models invoke novel phenomena" .
For the studies of MTs in neurons, we need to take into consideration that knowledge derived from non-neuronal cells might only partly apply . Furthermore, the interactome shown in Fig. 3 makes clear that we will need quantitative approaches: we know increasingly well how factors bind to MTs and partly understand how they might compete with each other. But how crowded can a single MT be, how many molecules are there in its surrounding at any time point, and how much dynamic exchange is taking place? Computational modelling will be an unavoidable means to make sense of existing data and make reasonable predictions to inform experimentation [386, 387].
Integrated understanding of axon biology will also improve our knowledge of the next higher level of complexity, i.e. the signalling networks and systemic factors (e.g. second messengers, ATP, ROS, the 'tubulin code' [104, 113, 212, 388]) that govern axon homeostasis and that maintain balance even during phases of change (e.g. when switching from growth to differentiation, or during stress, injury, regeneration) - or that tip the balance and induce degeneration in disease or ageing. Also the roles of glial cells, likely acting as important external influencers of such systemic processes , will become clearer.
Finally, MTs have been recognised as promising therapeutic targets [302, 390, 391], and urgently needed advance on this translational path will be facilitated by a better understanding of the axonal MT homeostasis system. A larger focus of the research community on MTs and, in turn, an improved availability of MT-related data that can be incorporated into our understanding, would be a key prerequisite to make such progress.
Work underpinning this article was made possible through support by the BBSRC to A. P (BB/I002448/1, BB/P020151/1, BB/L000717/1, BB/M007553/1), by parents to Y.-T.L., by the Leverhulme Trust to I.H. (ECF-2017-247). The Manchester Bioimaging Facility microscopes used in this study were purchased with grants from the BBSRC, The Wellcome Trust and The University of Manchester Strategic Fund. The Fly Facility has been supported by funds from The University of Manchester and the Wellcome Trust (087742/Z/08/Z). We thank Anthony Brown for introducing A.P. to the arguments that support a role of intermediate filaments in axon diameter, Anna Akhmanova as well as Casper Hoogenraad and his group for constructive and helpful feedback that has hopefully been well addressed in our last version, and Kyle Miller for major contributions to the contents of Table 5.
AP has done most of the writing and designed all figures, IH and BCG have contributed substantially to the writing, AV and YTL have contributed unpublished data shown in Fig. 4. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
All sources of funding for the research reported are declared in the acknowledgement section.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Bichenback J. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. WHO, ISCOS: Switzerland; 2013.Google Scholar
- 7.Tang-Schomer MD, Johnson VE, Baas PW, Stewart W, Smith DH. Partial interruption of axonal transport due to microtubule breakage accounts for the formation of periodic varicosities after traumatic axonal injury. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:364–72 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22079153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Salvadores N, Sanhueza M, Manque P, Court FA. Axonal degeneration during aging and its functional role in neurodegenerative disorders. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:451 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00451.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Riancho J, Gonzalo I, Ruiz-Soto M, Berciano J. Why do motor neurons degenerate? Actualization in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurología. 2019;34:27–37 http://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-neurologia-english-edition-495-articulo-why-do-motor-neurons-degenerate-S2173580817301633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hirokawa N: Molecular architecture and dynamics of the neuronal cytoskeleton. In The neuronal cytoskeleton. Edited by Burgoyne R. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1991: 5-74Google Scholar
- 18.Ganguly A, Tang Y, Wang L, Ladt K, Loi J, Dargent B, Leterrier C, Roy S. A dynamic formin-dependent deep F-actin network in axons. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:401–17 http://jcb.rupress.org/content/early/2015/07/21/jcb.201506110.abstract.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Qu Y, Hahn I, Webb SED, Pearce SP, Prokop A. Periodic actin structures in neuronal axons are required to maintain microtubules. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:296–308 http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/early/2016/11/21/mbc.E16-10-0727.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Vassilopoulos S, Gibaud S, Jimenez A, Caillol G, Leterrier C: Ultrastructure of the axonal periodic scaffold reveals a braid-like organization of actin rings. bioRxiv 2019:636217. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/636217v2
- 25.Leterrier C. The axon initial segment: an updated viewpoint. J Neurosci. 2018;38:2135–45 http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/38/9/2135.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Dent EW, Gupton SL, Gertler FB. The growth cone cytoskeleton in axon outgrowth and guidance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a001800 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21106647.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Friede RL, Samorajski T. Axon caliber related to neurofilaments and microtubules in sciatic nerve fibers of rats and mice. Anat Rec. 1970;167:379–87 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=5454590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Rao MV, Campbell J, Yuan A, Kumar A, Gotow T, Uchiyama Y, Nixon RA. The neurofilament middle molecular mass subunit carboxyl-terminal tail domains is essential for the radial growth and cytoskeletal architecture of axons but not for regulating neurofilament transport rate. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1021–31 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14662746.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Eyer J, Cleveland DW, Wong PC, Peterson AC. Pathogenesis of two axonopathies does not require axonal neurofilaments. Nature. 1998;391:584–7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9468135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Allen MJ, Godenschwege TA, Tanouye MA, Phelan P. Making an escape: development and function of the Drosophila giant fibre system. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006;17:31–41 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16378740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Voelzmann A, Hahn I, Pearce S, Sánchez-Soriano NP, Prokop A. A conceptual view at microtubule plus end dynamics in neuronal axons. Brain Res Bulletin. 2016;126:226–37 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923016301885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Sakakibara A, Ando R, Sapir T, Tanaka T. Microtubule dynamics in neuronal morphogenesis. Open Biology. 2013;3:130061 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsob.130061.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Tas RP, Kapitein LC. Exploring cytoskeletal diversity in neurons. Science. 2018;361:231–2 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/361/6399/231.full.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Miller KE, Suter DM. An integrated cytoskeletal model of neurite outgrowth. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:477 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2018.00447.Google Scholar
- 51.Tint I, Jean D, Baas PW, Black MM. Doublecortin associates with microtubules preferentially in regions of the axon displaying actin-rich protrusive structures. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10995–1010 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19726658.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Bodaleo FJ, Gonzalez-Billault C. The presynaptic microtubule cytoskeleton in physiological and pathological conditions: lessons from Drosophila Fragile X Syndrome and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;9:60 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27504085.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Wozniak KM, Vornov JJ, Wu Y, Liu Y, Carozzi VA, Rodriguez-Menendez V, Ballarini E, Alberti P, Pozzi E, Semperboni S, et al. Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Microtubule-Targeted Chemotherapies: Insights into Acute Injury and Long-term Recovery. Cancer Res. 2018;78:817–29 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29191802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Bernier G, Kothary R. Prenatal onset of axonopathy in Dystonia musculorum mice. Dev Genet. 1998;22:160–8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9581287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Dalpe G, Leclerc N, Vallee A, Messer A, Mathieu M, De Repentigny Y, Kothary R. Dystonin is essential for maintaining neuronal cytoskeleton organization. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1998;10:243–57 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9604204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Yin X, Kidd GJ, Ohno N, Perkins GA, Ellisman MH, Bastian C, Brunet S, Baltan S, Trapp BD. Proteolipid protein-deficient myelin promotes axonal mitochondrial dysfunction via altered metabolic coupling. J Cell Biol. 2016;215:531–42 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872255.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Denton KR, Lei L, Grenier J, Rodionov V, Blackstone C, Li XJ. Loss of spastin function results in disease-specific axonal defects in human pluripotent stem cell-based models of hereditary spastic paraplegia. Stem Cells. 2014;32:414–23 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24123785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Tarrade A, Fassier C, Courageot S, Charvin D, Vitte J, Peris L, Thorel A, Mouisel E, Fonknechten N, Roblot N, et al. A mutation of spastin is responsible for swellings and impairment of transport in a region of axon characterized by changes in microtubule composition. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:3544–58 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Fassier C, Tarrade A, Peris L, Courageot S, Mailly P, Dalard C, Delga S, Roblot N, Lefevre J, Job D, et al. Microtubule-targeting drugs rescue axonal swellings in cortical neurons from spastin knockout mice. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:72–83 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22773755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.Hsu J-M, Chen C-H, Chen Y-C, McDonald KL, Gurling M, Lee A, Garriga G, Pan C-L. Genetic analysis of a novel tubulin mutation that redirects synaptic vesicle targeting and causes neurite degeneration in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 67.Fiala JC, Feinberg M, Peters A, Barbas H. Mitochondrial degeneration in dystrophic neurites of senile plaques may lead to extracellular deposition of fine filaments. Brain Struct Funct. 2007;212:195–207 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17717688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 69.Elden AC, Kim H-J, Hart MP, Chen-Plotkin AS, Johnson BS, Fang X, Armakola M, Geser F, Greene R, Lu MM, et al. Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with increased risk for ALS. Nature. 2010;466:1069. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 71.Bellen HJ, Tong C, Tsuda H. 100 years of Drosophila research and its impact on vertebrate neuroscience: a history lesson for the future. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:514–22 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20383202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Beaven R, Dzhindzhev NS, Qu Y, Hahn I, Dajas-Bailador F, Ohkura H, Prokop A. Drosophila CLIP-190 and mammalian CLIP-170 display reduced microtubule plus end association in the nervous system. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26:1491–508 http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/26/8/1491.abstract.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 73.Gonçalves-Pimentel C, Gombos R, Mihály J, Sánchez-Soriano N, Prokop A. Dissecting regulatory networks of filopodia formation in a Drosophila growth cone model. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18340 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0018340.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 74.Qu Y, Hahn I, Lees M, Parkin J, Voelzmann A, Dorey K, Rathbone A, Friel C, Allan V, Okenve Ramos P, et al: Efa6 protects axons and regulates their growth and branching by inhibiting microtubule polymerisation at the cortex. bioRxiv 2018, 10.1101/385658https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/385658v4
- 75.Alves-Silva J, Sánchez-Soriano N, Beaven R, Klein M, Parkin J, Millard T, Bellen H, Venken KJT, Ballestrem C, Kammerer RA, Prokop A. Spectraplakins promote microtubule-mediated axonal growth by functioning as structural microtubule-associated proteins and EB1-dependent +TIPs (Tip Interacting Proteins). J Neurosci. 2012;32:9143–58 http://www.jneurosci.org/content/32/27/9143.full.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.Voelzmann A, Okenve-Ramos P, Qu Y, Chojnowska-Monga M, del Caño-Espinel M, Prokop A, Sánchez-Soriano N. Tau and spectraplakins promote synapse formation and maintenance through Jun kinase and neuronal trafficking. eLife. 2016;5:e14694 https://elifesciences.org/content/5/e14694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Sánchez-Soriano N, Gonçalves-Pimentel C, Beaven R, Haessler U, Ofner L, Ballestrem C, Prokop A. Drosophila growth cones: a genetically tractable platform for the analysis of axonal growth dynamics. Dev Neurobiol. 2010;70:58–71 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dneu.20762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 78.Prokop A, Küppers-Munther B, Sánchez-Soriano N: Using primary neuron cultures of Drosophila to analyse neuronal circuit formation and function. In The making and un-making of neuronal circuits in Drosophila. Volume 69. Edited by Hassan BA. New York: Humana Press; 2012: 225-247.[Walz W (Series Editor): Neuromethods]. http://www.springerlink.com/content/t07618161235u475/#section=1102403&page=1 Google Scholar
- 81.Yogev S, Cooper R, Fetter R, Horowitz M, Shen K. Microtubule organization determines axonal transport dynamics. Neuron. 2016;92:449–60 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627316306377.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 83.Krieg M, Stühmer J, Cueva JG, Fetter R, Spilker K, Cremers D, Shen K, Dunn AR, Goodman MB: Genetic defects in β-spectrin and tau sensitize C. elegans axons to movement-induced damage via torque-tension coupling. Elife 2017, 6:e20172. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20172
- 85.Howard J. Mechanics of motorproteins and the cytoskeleton. Sunderland: Sinauer Assoc.; 2001.Google Scholar
- 87.Sánchez-Soriano N, Travis M, Dajas-Bailador F, Goncalves-Pimentel C, Whitmarsh AJ, Prokop A. Mouse ACF7 and Drosophila Short stop modulate filopodia formation and microtubule organisation during neuronal growth. Journal of cell science. 2009;122:2534–42 http://jcs.biologists.org/content/122/14/2534.long.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 88.Ahmad FJ, He Y, Myers KA, Hasaka TP, Francis F, Black MM, Baas PW. Effects of dynactin disruption and dynein depletion on axonal microtubules. Traffic. 2006;7:524–37 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16643276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 90.Voelzmann A, Liew Y-T, Qu Y, Hahn I, Melero C, Sánchez-Soriano N, Prokop A. Drosophila Short stop as a paradigm for the role and regulation of spectraplakins. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2017;69:40–57 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952117302124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 97.Chaaban S, Brouhard GJ. A microtubule bestiary: structural diversity in tubulin polymers. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:2924–31 http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/28/22/2924.abstract.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 102.Shaw G, Bray D. Movement and extension of isolated growth cones. Exp Cell Res. 1977;104:55–62 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=556695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.Ti S-C, Alushin GM, Kapoor TM. Human β-tubulin isotypes can regulate microtubule protofilament number and stability. Developmental Cell. 2018;47:175–190.e175 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580718306841.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 106.Janke C, Kneussel M. Tubulin post-translational modifications: encoding functions on the neuronal microtubule cytoskeleton. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:362–72 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20541813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 107.Valenstein ML, Roll-Mecak A. Graded control of microtubule severing by tubulin glutamylation. Cell. 2016;164:911–21 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867416000593?via%3Dihub.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 109.Song Y, Kirkpatrick LL, Schilling AB, Helseth DL, Chabot N, Keillor JW, Johnson GV, Brady ST. Transglutaminase and polyamination of tubulin: posttranslational modification for stabilizing axonal microtubules. Neuron. 2013;78:109–23 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23583110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 111.Xu Z, Schaedel L, Portran D, Aguilar A, Gaillard J, Marinkovich MP, Théry M, Nachury MV. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science. 2017;356:328–32 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/356/6335/328.full.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 118.Bechstedt S, Lu K, Brouhard Gary J. Doublecortin recognizes the longitudinal curvature of the microtubule end and lattice. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2366–75 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982214010525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 122.Kerssemakers J, Howard J, Hess H, Diez S. The distance that kinesin-1 holds its cargo from the microtubule surface measured by fluorescence interference contrast microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:15812–7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17035506.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 126.Amos L, Amos W. The bending of sliding microtubules imaged by confocal light microscopy and negative stain electron microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1991;1991:95–101 http://jcs.biologists.org/content/joces/1991/Supplement_14/95.full.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 128.Waterman-Storer CM, Salmon ED. Actomyosin-based retrograde flow of microtubules in the lamella of migrating epithelial cells influences microtubule dynamic instability and turnover and is associated with microtubule breakage and treadmilling. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:417–34 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9334345.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 129.Odde DJ, Ma L, Briggs AH, DeMarco A, Kirschner MW. Microtubule bending and breaking in living fibroblast cells. Journal of cell science. 1999;112:3283–8 http://jcs.biologists.org/content/joces/112/19/3283.full.pdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 131.Dent EW, Kalil K. Axon branching requires interactions between dynamic microtubules and actin filaments. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9757–69 http://www.jneurosci.org.manchester.idm.oclc.org/content/21/24/9757.long.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 140.Nakashima KK, Vibhute MA, Spruijt E. Biomolecular Chemistry in Liquid Phase Separated Compartments. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2019;6:21 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmolb.2019.00021.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 149.Balabanian L, Berger CL, Hendricks AG. Acetylated microtubules are preferentially bundled leading to enhanced kinesin-1 motility. Biophys J. 2017;113:1551–60 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349517308664.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 151.Fourniol FJ, Sindelar CV, Amigues B, Clare DK, Thomas G, Perderiset M, Francis F, Houdusse A, Moores CA. Template-free 13-protofilament microtubule–MAP assembly visualized at 8 Å resolution. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:463–70 http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/191/3/463.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 155.Cross RA. Microtubule lattice plasticity. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;56:88–93 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955067418301418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 159.Kononova O, Kholodov Y, Theisen KE, Marx KA, Dima RI, Ataullakhanov FI, Grishchuk EL, Barsegov V. Tubulin bond energies and microtubule biomechanics determined from nanoindentation in silico. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:17036–45 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja506385p.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 161.Sturgill EG, Ohi R. Microtubule-regulating kinesins. Current Biology. 2013;23:R946–8 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213009883.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 164.Gumy LF, Chew DJ, Tortosa E, Katrukha EA, Kapitein LC, Tolkovsky AM, Hoogenraad CC, Fawcett JW. The kinesin-2 family member KIF3C regulates microtubule dynamics and is required for axon growth and regeneration. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11329–45 http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/33/28/11329.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 166.Strothman C, Farmer V, Arpağ G, Rodgers N, Podolski M, Norris S, Ohi R, Zanic M: Microtubule minus-end stability is dictated by the tubulin off-rate. J Cell Biol 2019:jcb.201905019. http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/early/2019/08/14/jcb.201905019.full.pdf
- 167.Tas RP, Chazeau A, Cloin BMC, Lambers MLA, Hoogenraad CC, Kapitein LC. Differentiation between oppositely oriented microtubules controls polarized neuronal transport. Neuron. 2017;96:1264–71 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627317310711.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 168.Zheng Y, Wildonger J, Ye B, Zhang Y, Kita A, Younger SH, Zimmerman S, Jan LY, Jan YN. Dynein is required for polarized dendritic transport and uniform microtubule orientation in axons. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1172–80 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18758451.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 171.Appert-Rolland C, Ebbinghaus M, Santen L. Intracellular transport driven by cytoskeletal motors: General mechanisms and defects. Physics Reports. 2015;593:1–59 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037015731500335X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 172.Wortman JC, Shrestha UM, Barry DM, Garcia ML, Gross SP, Yu CC. Axonal transport: how high microtubule density can compensate for boundary effects in small-caliber axons. Biophys J. 2014;106:813–23 https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495(14)00075-7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 173.Pannese E, Ledda M, Arcidiacono G, Rigamonti L, Procacci P. A comparison of the density of microtubules in the central and peripheral axonal branches of the pseudounipolar neurons of lizard spinal ganglia. Anat Rec. 1984;208:595–605 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6731865.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 183.Triclin S, Inoue D, Gaillard J, Htet ZM, De Santis M, Portran D, Derivery E, Aumeier C, Schaedel L, John K, et al: Self-repair protects microtubules from their destruction by molecular motors. bioRxiv 2018:499020. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/12/17/499020.full
- 184.Akhmanova A. Strengthening Microtubules by Cuts that Heal. Dev Cell. 2018;47:400–1 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580718309201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 187.Abdul-Majid KB, Jirholt J, Stadelmann C, Stefferl A, Kjellen P, Wallstrom E, Holmdahl R, Lassmann H, Olsson T, Harris RA. Screening of several H-2 congenic mouse strains identified H-2(q) mice as highly susceptible to MOG-induced EAE with minimal adjuvant requirement. J Neuroimmunol. 2000;111:23–33 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11063818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 188.Kuijpers M, van de Willige D, Freal A, Chazeau A, Franker Mariella A, Hofenk J, Rodrigues Ricardo JC, Kapitein Lukas C, Akhmanova A, Jaarsma D, Hoogenraad Casper C. Dynein regulator NDEL1 controls polarized cargo transport at the axon initial segment. Neuron. 2016;89:461–71 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627316000477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 189.Stokin GB, Almenar-Queralt A, Gunawardena S, Rodrigues EM, Falzone T, Kim J, Lillo C, Mount SL, Roberts EA, McGowan E, et al. Amyloid precursor protein-induced axonopathies are independent of amyloid-beta peptides. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:3474–86 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18694898.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 190.Stokin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL, Brusch RG, Rockenstein E, Mount SL, Raman R, Davies P, Masliah E, Williams DS, Goldstein LS. Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Science. 2005;307:1282–8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15731448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 194.Zhang B, Carroll J, Trojanowski JQ, Yao Y, Iba M, Potuzak JS, Hogan AM, Xie SX, Ballatore C, Smith AB 3rd, et al. The microtubule-stabilizing agent, epothilone D, reduces axonal dysfunction, neurotoxicity, cognitive deficits, and Alzheimer-like pathology in an interventional study with aged tau transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32:3601–11 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423084.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 196.Skruber K, Read T-A, Vitriol EA: Reconsidering an active role for G-actin in cytoskeletal regulation. J Cell Sci 2018, 131:10.1242/jcs.203760. http://jcs.biologists.org/content/joces/131/1/jcs203760.full
- 199.Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L: Biochemistry (5th edition). New York: W H Freeman; 2002.Google Scholar
- 200.Hall A, Lalli G. Rho and Ras GTPases in axon growth, guidance, and branching. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001818 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20182621.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 201.McNally FJ, Roll-Mecak A. Microtubule-severing enzymes: From cellular functions to molecular mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:4057–69 http://jcb.rupress.org/content/early/2018/10/31/jcb.201612104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 202.Zala D, Hinckelmann M-V, Yu H, da Cunha L, Menezes M, Liot G, Cordelières Fabrice P, Marco S, Saudou F. Vesicular glycolysis provides on-board energy for fast axonal transport. Cell. 2013;152:479–91 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867412015516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 209.O'Brien ET, Salmon ED, Erickson HP. How calcium causes microtubule depolymerization. Cell Motility. 1997;36:125–35 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0169%281997%2936%3A2%3C125%3A%3AAID-CM3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 214.Wali G, Sutharsan R, Fan Y, Stewart R, Tello Velasquez J, Sue CM, Crane DI, Mackay-Sim A. Mechanism of impaired microtubule-dependent peroxisome trafficking and oxidative stress in SPAST-mutated cells from patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27004. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 216.Poruchynsky MS, Sackett DL, Robey RW, Ward Y, Annunziata C, Fojo T. Proteasome inhibitors increase tubulin polymerization and stabilization in tissue culture cells: A possible mechanism contributing to peripheral neuropathy and cellular toxicity following proteasome inhibition. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:940–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.7.5625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 217.Staff NP, Podratz JL, Grassner L, Bader M, Paz J, Knight AM, Loprinzi CL, Trushina E, Windebank AJ. Bortezomib alters microtubule polymerization and axonal transport in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurotoxicology. 2013;39:124–31 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24035926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 219.Stiess M, Maghelli N, Kapitein LC, Gomis-Ruth S, Wilsch-Brauninger M, Hoogenraad CC, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Bradke F. Axon extension occurs independently of centrosomal microtubule nucleation. Science. 2010;327:704–7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20056854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 220.Basto R, Lau J, Vinogradova T, Gardiol A, Woods CG, Khodjakov A, Raff JW. Flies without centrioles. Cell. 2006;125:1375–86 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16814722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 224.Brandt R, Lee G. The balance between tau protein's microtubule growth and nucleation activities: implications for the formation of axonal microtubules. J Neurochem. 1993;61:997–1005 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=8360696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 226.Cunha-Ferreira I, Chazeau A, Buijs RR, Stucchi R, Will L, Pan X, Adolfs Y, van der Meer C, Wolthuis JC, Kahn OI, et al. The HAUS complex is a key regulator of non-centrosomal microtubule organization during neuronal development. Cell Rep. 2018;24:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 227.Sanchez-Huertas C, Freixo F, Viais R, Lacasa C, Soriano E, Lüders J. Non-centrosomal nucleation mediated by augmin organizes microtubules in post-mitotic neurons and controls axonal microtubule polarity. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12187. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 228.Chen L, Stone MC, Tao J, Rolls MM. Axon injury and stress trigger a microtubule-based neuroprotective pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:11842–7 https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/109/29/11842.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 229.Verma V, Maresca TJ: Direct observation of branching MT nucleation in living animal cells. J Cell Biol 2019:jcb.201904114. http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/early/2019/07/23/jcb.201904114.full.pdf
- 230.Al-Bassam J. Revisiting the tubulin cofactors and Arl2 in the regulation of soluble αβ-tubulin pools and their effect on microtubule dynamics. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:359–63 http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/28/3/359.abstract.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 231.Preitner N, Quan J, Nowakowski Dan W, Hancock Melissa L, Shi J, Tcherkezian J, Young-Pearse Tracy L, Flanagan John G. APC is an RNA-binding protein, and its interactome provides a link to neural development and microtubule assembly. Cell. 2014;158:368–82 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867414007478.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 233.Letourneau PC, Shattuck TA, Ressler AH. "Pull" and "push" in neurite elongation: observations on the effects of different concentrations of cytochalasin B and taxol. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8:193–209 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=2891448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 235.Datar A, Ameeramja J, Bhat A, Srivastava R, Bernal R, Prost J, Callan-Jones A, Pullarkat PA: The roles of microtubules and membrane tension in axonal beading, retraction, and atrophy. bioRxiv 2019:10.1101/575258. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/03/12/575258.full
- 236.Zhou R, Han B, Xia C, Zhuang X. Membrane-associated periodic skeleton is a signaling platform for RTK transactivation in neurons. Science. 2019;365:929–34 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/365/6456/929.full.pdf.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 246.O'Toole M, Lamoureux P, Miller Kyle E. Measurement of subcellular force generation in neurons. Biophys J. 2015;108:1027–37 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349515001150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 248.Lamoureux P, Heidemann SR, Martzke NR, Miller KE. Growth and elongation within and along the axon. Dev Neurobiol. 2010;70:135–49 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19950193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 251.Zheng J, Lamoureux P, Santiago V, Dennerll T, Buxbaum RE, Heidemann SR. Tensile regulation of axonal elongation and initiation. J Neurosci. 1991;11:1117–25 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=2010807.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 254.Turney SG, Ahmed M, Chandrasekar I, Wysolmerski RB, Goeckeler ZM, Rioux RM, Whitesides GM, Bridgman PC. Nerve growth factor stimulates axon outgrowth through negative regulation of growth cone actomyosin restraint of microtubule advance. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27:500–17 http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/early/2015/11/29/mbc.E15-09-0636.abstract.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 260.Franze K, Gerdelmann J, Weick M, Betz T, Pawlizak S, Lakadamyali M, Bayer J, Rillich K, Gogler M, Lu YB, et al. Neurite branch retraction is caused by a threshold-dependent mechanical impact. Biophys J. 2009;97:1883–90 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19804718.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 263.van der Vaart B, van Riel WE, Doodhi H, Kevenaar Josta T, Katrukha Eugene A, Gumy L, Bouchet Benjamin P, Grigoriev I, Spangler Samantha A, Yu Ka L, et al. CFEOM1-associated kinesin KIF21A is a cortical microtubule growth inhibitor. Developmental Cell. 2013;27:145–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 264.Pines MK, Housden BE, Bernard F, Bray SJ, Roper K. The cytolinker Pigs is a direct target and a negative regulator of Notch signalling. Development. 2010;137:913–22 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20150280.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 265.Stroud MJ, Nazgiewicz A, McKenzie EA, Wang Y, Kammerer RA, Ballestrem C. GAS2-like proteins mediate communication between microtubules and actin through interactions with end-binding proteins. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:2672–82 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24706950.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 266.van de Willige D, Hummel JJ, Alkemade C, Kahn OI, Au FK, Qi RZ, Dogterom M, Koenderink GH, Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A: Cytolinker Gas2L1 regulates axon morphology through microtubule-modulated actin stabilization. EMBO Reports 2019, 0:e47732. https://www.embopress.org/doi/abs/10.15252/embr.201947732
- 267.Mattie FJ, Stackpole MM, Stone MC, Clippard JR, Rudnick DA, Qiu Y, Tao J, Allender DL, Parmar M, Rolls MM. Directed microtubule growth, +TIPs, and kinesin-2 are required for uniform microtubule polarity in dendrites. Curr Biol. 2010;20:2169–77 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21145742.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 268.Ageta-Ishihara N, Miyata T, Ohshima C, Watanabe M, Sato Y, Hamamura Y, Higashiyama T, Mazitschek R, Bito H, Kinoshita M. Septins promote dendrite and axon development by negatively regulating microtubule stability via HDAC6-mediated deacetylation. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2532. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 270.Hu J, Bai X, Bowen JR, Dolat L, Korobova F, Yu W, Baas PW, Svitkina T, Gallo G, Spiliotis ET. Septin-driven coordination of actin and microtubule remodeling regulates the collateral branching of axons. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1109–15 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22608511.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 272.Mao C-X, Xiong Y, Xiong Z, Wang Q, Zhang YQ, Jin S. Microtubule-severing protein Katanin regulates neuromuscular junction development and dendritic elaboration in Drosophila. Development. 2014;141:1064–74 http://dev.biologists.org/content/141/5/1064.abstract.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 274.Leo L, Yu W, D'Rozario M, Waddell EA, Marenda DR, Baird MA, Davidson MW, Zhou B, Wu B, Baker L, et al. Vertebrate fidgetin restrains axonal growth by severing labile domains of microtubules. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1723–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 275.Yu W, Qiang L, Solowska JM, Karabay A, Korulu S, Baas PW. The microtubule-severing proteins spastin and katanin participate differently in the formation of axonal branches. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:1485–98 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18234839.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 276.Stewart A, Tsubouchi A, Rolls MM, Tracey WD, Sherwood NT. Katanin p60-like1 promotes microtubule growth and terminal dendrite stability in the larval class IV sensory neurons of Drosophila. J Neurosc. 2012;32:11631–42 http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/32/34/11631.full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 277.Wood JD, Landers JA, Bingley M, McDermott CJ, Thomas-McArthur V, Gleadall LJ, Shaw PJ, Cunliffe VT. The microtubule-severing protein Spastin is essential for axon outgrowth in the zebrafish embryo. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2763–71 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16893913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 279.Karabay A, Yu W, Solowska JM, Baird DH, Baas PW. Axonal growth is sensitive to the levels of katanin, a protein that severs microtubules. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5778–88 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15215300.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 280.Ahmad FJ, Yu W, McNally FJ, Baas PW. An essential role for katanin in severing microtubules in the neuron. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:305–15 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10209026.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 281.Butler R, Wood JD, Landers JA, Cunliffe VT. Genetic and chemical modulation of spastin-dependent axon outgrowth in zebrafish embryos indicates a role for impaired microtubule dynamics in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:743–51 http://dmm.biologists.org/content/3/11-12/743.long.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 282.Riano E, Martignoni M, Mancuso G, Cartelli D, Crippa F, Toldo I, Siciliano G, Di Bella D, Taroni F, Bassi MT, et al. Pleiotropic effects of spastin on neurite growth depending on expression levels. J Neurochem. 2009;108:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05875.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 283.Zhang D, Rogers GC, Buster DW, Sharp DJ. Three microtubule severing enzymes contribute to the "Pacman-flux" machinery that moves chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:231–42 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17452528.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 286.Bailey ME, Sackett DL, Ross JL. Katanin Severing and Binding Microtubules Are Inhibited by Tubulin Carboxy Tails. Biophys J. 2015;109:2546–61 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699919/?otool=igbumllib.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 289.Qiang L, Yu W, Andreadis A, Luo M, Baas PW. Tau protects microtubules in the axon from severing by katanin. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3120–9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16554463.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 291.Jiang K, Faltova L, Hua S, Capitani G, Prota AE, Landgraf C, Volkmer R, Kammerer RA, Steinmetz MO, Akhmanova A: Structural basis of formation of the microtubule minus-end-regulating CAMSAP-katanin complex. Structure 2018, 26:375-382 e374. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395789 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 294.Goodwin SS, Vale RD. Patronin regulates the microtubule network by protecting microtubule minus ends. Cell. 2010;143:263–74 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20946984.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 295.Pongrakhananon V, Saito H, Hiver S, Abe T, Shioi G, Meng W, Takeichi M. CAMSAP3 maintains neuronal polarity through regulation of microtubule stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:9750–5 https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/115/39/9750.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 303.Shoukier M, Neesen J, Sauter SM, Argyriou L, Doerwald N, Pantakani DV, Mannan AU. Expansion of mutation spectrum, determination of mutation cluster regions and predictive structural classification of SPAST mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:187–94 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18701882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 305.Allison R, Edgar JR, Pearson G, Rizo T, Newton T, Gunther S, Berner F, Hague J, Connell JW, Winkler J, et al. Defects in ER-endosome contacts impact lysosome function in hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Cell Biol. 2017;216:1337–55 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389476.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 308.Lee G, Brandt R. Microtubule bundling studies revisited: is there a role for MAPs? Trends in Cell Biology. 1992;2:286–9 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096289249290106W.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 311.de Rooij R, Kuhl E. Microtubule polymerization and cross-link dynamics explain axonal stiffness and damage. Biophys J. 2018;114:201–12 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349517312390.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 312.Lazarus C, Soheilypour M, Mofrad Mohammad RK. Torsional behavior of axonal microtubule bundles. Biophys J. 2015;109:231–9 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349515006128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 313.Li S, Wang C, Nithiarasu P. Effects of the cross-linkers on the buckling of microtubules in cells. J Biomech. 2018;72:167–72 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929018301544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 315.Bodakuntla S, Jijumon AS, Villablanca C, Gonzalez-Billault C, Janke C. Microtubule-Associated Proteins: Structuring the Cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2019.1007.1004 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962892419301205.
- 316.Chapin SJ, Bulinski JC, Gundersen GG. Microtubule bundling in cells. Nature. 1991;349:24 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1670738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 319.Goriounov D, Leung CL, Liem RK. Protein products of human Gas2-related genes on chromosomes 17 and 22 (hGAR17 and hGAR22) associate with both microfilaments and microtubules. Journal of cell science. 2003;116:1045–58 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=12584248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 322.Züchner S, Noureddine M, Kennerson M, Verhoeven K, Claeys K, De Jonghe P, Merory J, Oliveira SA, Speer MC, Stenger JE, et al. Mutations in the pleckstrin homology domain of dynamin 2 cause dominant intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37:289–94 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15731758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 325.Roos J, Hummel T, Ng N, Klämbt C, Davis GW. Drosophila Futsch regulates synaptic microtubule organisation and is necessary for synaptic growth. Neuron. 2000;26:371–82 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10839356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 326.Feltrin D, Fusco L, Witte H, Moretti F, Martin K, Letzelter M, Fluri E, Scheiffele P, Pertz O. Growth cone MKK7 mRNA targeting regulates MAP 1b-dependent microtubule bundling to control neurite elongation. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001439 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 327.Bettencourt da Cruz A, Schwarzel M, Schulze S, Niyyati M, Heisenberg M, Kretzschmar D. Disruption of the MAP 1B-related protein FUTSCH leads to changes in the neuronal cytoskeleton, axonal transport defects, and progressive neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:2433–42 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15772149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 328.Stephan R, Goellner B, Moreno E, Frank CA, Hugenschmidt T, Genoud C, Aberle H, Pielage J. Hierarchical microtubule organization controls axon caliber and transport and determines synaptic structure and stability. Dev Cell. 2015;33:1–17 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580715001057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 329.Hummel T, Krukkert K, Roos J, Davis G, Klämbt C. Drosophila Futsch/22C10 is a MAP 1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development. Neuron. 2000;26:357–70 https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(00)81169-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 330.Migh E, Götz T, Földi I, Szikora S, Gombos R, Darula Z, Medzihradszky KF, Maléth J, Hegyi P, Sigrist S, Mihály J: Microtubule organization in presynaptic boutons relies on the formin DAAM. Development 2018:dev.158519. http://dev.biologists.org/content/develop/early/2018/02/21/dev.158519.full
- 332.Satake T, Yamashita K, Hayashi K, Miyatake S, Tamura-Nakano M, Doi H, Furuta Y, Shioi G, Miura E, Takeo YH, et al. MTCL1 plays an essential role in maintaining Purkinje neuron axon initial segment. EMBO J. 2017;36:1227–42 http://emboj.embopress.org/content/embojnl/36/9/1227.full.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 333.Sato Y, Akitsu M, Amano Y, Yamashita K, Ide M, Shimada K, Yamashita A, Hirano H, Arakawa N, Maki T, et al. The novel PAR-1-binding protein MTCL1 has crucial roles in organizing microtubules in polarizing epithelial cells. Journal of cell science. 2013;126:4671–83 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 334.Peters A, Palay SL. Webster Hd: The fine structure of the nervous system: neurons and their supporting cells. 3rd ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Fine_Structure_of_the_Nervous_System.html?id=eapqAAAAMAAJ&source=kp_cover&redir_esc=y Google Scholar
- 335.Harterink M, Vocking K, Pan X, Soriano Jerez EM, Slenders L, Freal A, Tas RP, van de Wetering WJ, Timmer K, Motshagen J, et al. TRIM46 organizes microtubule fasciculation in the axon initial segment. J Neurosci. 2019;39:4864–73 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 336.van Beuningen Sam FB, Will L, Harterink M, Chazeau A, van Battum EY, Frias Cátia P, Franker Mariella AM, Katrukha Eugene A, Stucchi R, Vocking K, et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron. 2015;88:1208–26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 337.Chung PJ, Song C, Deek J, Miller HP, Li Y, Choi MC, Wilson L, Feinstein SC, Safinya CR. Tau mediates microtubule bundle architectures mimicking fascicles of microtubules found in the axon initial segment. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12278 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12278.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 338.Rosenberg KJ, Ross JL, Feinstein HE, Feinstein SC, Israelachvili J. Complementary dimerization of microtubule-associated tau protein: Implications for microtubule bundling and tau-mediated pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7445–50 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495933.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 339.Méphon-Gaspard A, Boca M, Pioche-Durieu C, Desforges B, Burgo A, Hamon L, Piétrement O, Pastré D. Role of tau in the spatial organization of axonal microtubules: keeping parallel microtubules evenly distributed despite macromolecular crowding. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:3745–60 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27076215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 340.Janning D, Igaev M, Sundermann F, Bruhmann J, Beutel O, Heinisch JJ, Bakota L, Piehler J, Junge W, Brandt R. Single-molecule tracking of tau reveals fast kiss-and-hop interaction with microtubules in living neurons. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:3541–51 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 343.Prezel E, Elie A, Delaroche J, Stoppin-Mellet V, Bosc C, Serre L, Fourest-Lieuvin A, Andrieux A, Vantard M, Arnal I, Zhu X. Tau can switch microtubule network organizations: from random networks to dynamic and stable bundles. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2018;29:154–65 https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/abs/10.1091/mbc.E17-06-0429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 344.Biswas S, Kalil K. The microtubule-associated protein tau mediates the organization of microtubules and their dynamic exploration of actin-rich lamellipodia and filopodia of cortical growth cones. J Neurosci. 2018;38:291–307 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167405.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 345.Cabrales Fontela Y, Kadavath H, Biernat J, Riedel D, Mandelkow E, Zweckstetter M. Multivalent cross-linking of actin filaments and microtubules through the microtubule-associated protein Tau. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1981 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02230-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 346.Maas T, Eidenmuller J, Brandt R. Interaction of tau with the neural membrane cortex is regulated by phosphorylation at sites that are modified in paired helical filaments. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:15733–40 http://www.jbc.org.manchester.idm.oclc.org/content/275/21/15733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 348.Brandt R. Cytoskeletal mechanisms of axon outgrowth and pathfinding. Cell Tissue Res. 1998;292:181–9 https://link-springer-com.manchester.idm.oclc.org/article/10.1007%2Fs004410051049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 349.Baas PW, Qiang L. Tau: it’s not what you yhink. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:452–61 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962892419300388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 351.Trinczek B, Ebneth A, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E. Tau regulates the attachment/detachment but not the speed of motors in microtubule-dependent transport of single vesicles and organelles. Journal of cell science. 1999;112:2355–67 http://jcs.biologists.org/content/joces/112/14/2355.full.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 352.Hernández-Vega A, Braun M, Scharrel L, Jahnel M, Wegmann S, Hyman BT, Alberti S, Diez S, Hyman AA. Local nucleation of microtubule bundles through tubulin concentration into a condensed tau phase. Cell Rep. 2017;20:2304–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.042.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 353.Takei Y, Teng J, Harada A, Hirokawa N. Defects in axonal elongation and neuronal migration in mice with disrupted tau and map 1b genes. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:989–1000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10973990.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 355.Liu M, Nadar VC, Kozielski F, Kozlowska M, Yu W, Baas PW. Kinesin-12, a mitotic microtubule-associated motor protein, impacts axonal growth, navigation, and branching. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14896–906 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21048148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 359.Lu W, Fox P, Lakonishok M, Davidson Michael W, Gelfand Vladimir I. Initial neurite outgrowth in Drosophila neurons is driven by Kinesin-powered microtubule sliding. Current Biology. 2013;23:1018–23 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213004910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 360.Dong Z, Wu S, Zhu C, Wang X, Li Y, Chen X, Liu D, Qiang L, Baas PW, Liu M. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-mediated kif15 mutations accelerate axonal outgrowth during neuronal development and regeneration in zebrafish. Traffic. 2019;20:71–81 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30411440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 361.Baines AJ: Neuronal plasma membrane associated cytoskeleton. In The neuronal cytoskeleton. Edited by Burgoyne R. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1991: 161-183Google Scholar
- 362.Huang CY-M, Rasband MN. Axon initial segments: structure, function, and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2018;1420:46–61 https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nyas.13718.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 369.Lansky Z, Braun M, Lüdecke A, Schlierf M, ten Wolde PR, Janson Marcel E, Diez S. Diffusible crosslinkers generate directed forces in microtubule networks. Cell. 2015;160:1159–68 http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(15)00129-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 370.Lu W, Gelfand VI: Moonlighting Motors: Kinesin, Dynein, and Cell Polarity. Trends Cell Biol 2017http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28284467
- 371.He Y, Francis F, Myers KA, Yu W, Black MM, Baas PW. Role of cytoplasmic dynein in the axonal transport of microtubules and neurofilaments. J Cell Biol. 2005;168:697–703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15728192.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 372.Myers KA, He Y, Hasaka TP, Baas PW. Microtubule transport in the axon: Re-thinking a potential role for the actin cytoskeleton. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:107–18 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16514008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 376.Bottenberg W, Sánchez-Soriano N, Alves-Silva J, Hahn I, Mende M, Prokop A. Context-specific requirements of functional domains of the Spectraplakin Short stop in vivo. Mech Dev. 2009;126:489–502 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19409984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 377.Prokop A, Uhler J, Roote J, Bate MC. The kakapo mutation affects terminal arborisation and central dendritic sprouting of Drosophila motorneurons. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:1283–94 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9832556.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 378.Noordstra I, Liu Q, Nijenhuis W, Hua S, Jiang K, Baars M, Remmelzwaal S, Martin M, Kapitein LC, Akhmanova A. Control of apico-basal epithelial polarity by the microtubule minus-end-binding protein CAMSAP3 and spectraplakin ACF7. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:4278–88 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 379.Ning W, Yu Y, Xu H, Liu X, Wang D, Wang J, Wang Y, Meng W. The CAMSAP3-ACF7 complex couples noncentrosomal microtubules with actin filaments to coordinate their dynamics. Dev Cell. 2016;39:61–74 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580716305998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 380.Yau KW, van Beuningen SF, Cunha-Ferreira I, Cloin BM, van Battum EY, Will L, Schatzle P, Tas RP, van Krugten J, Katrukha EA, et al. Microtubule minus-end binding protein CAMSAP2 controls axon specification and dendrite development. Neuron. 2014;82:1058–73 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 382.Gu C, Yaddanapudi S, Weins A, Osborn T, Reiser J, Pollak M, Hartwig J, Sever S. Direct dynamin–actin interactions regulate the actin cytoskeleton. The EMBO Journal. 2010;29:3593–606 http://emboj.embopress.org/content/embojnl/29/21/3593.full.pdf.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 389.Pan S, Chan JR. Regulation and dysregulation of axon infrastructure by myelinating glia. Journal Cell Biol. 2017;216:3903–16 http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/216/12/3903.full.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 390.Eira J, Silva CS, Sousa MM, Liz MA. The cytoskeleton as a novel therapeutic target for old neurodegenerative disorders. Progr Neurobiol. 2016;141:61–82 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008215300800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 394.Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum S, Hudspeth AJ: Principles of neural science (5th edition). 5th edn: McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/manchester/detail.action?docID=4959346#
- 399.Shigeoka T, Koppers M, Wong HH-W, Lin JQ, Dwivedy A, Nascimento JdF, Cagnetta R, van Tartwijk F, Strohl F, Cioni J-M, et al: On-site ribosome remodeling by locally synthesized ribosomal proteins in axons. bioRxiv 2018:500033. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2018/12/19/500033.full
- 400.Frühbeis C, Fröhlich D, Kuo WP, Amphornrat J, Thilemann S, Saab AS, Kirchhoff F, Möbius W, Goebbels S, Nave KA, et al. Neurotransmitter-triggered transfer of exosomes mediates oligodendrocyte-neuron communication. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001604 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874151.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 401.Rajendran L, Bali J, Barr MM, Court FA, Kramer-Albers EM, Picou F, Raposo G, van der Vos KE, van Niel G, Wang J, Breakefield XO. Emerging roles of extracellular vesicles in the nervous system. J Neurosci. 2014;34:15482–9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25392515.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 405.Hur EM. Saijilafu, Lee BD, Kim SJ, Xu WL, Zhou FQ: GSK3 controls axon growth via CLASP-mediated regulation of growth cone microtubules. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1968–81 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=21937714.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 417.Gosselin P, Mohrbach H, Kulić IM, Ziebert F. On complex, curved trajectories in microtubule gliding. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 2016;318–319:105–11 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167278915002183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.