Management, morphological and genetic diversity of domesticated agaves in Michoacán, México
- 10 Downloads
Pulque is a fermented beverage prepared with sap of Agave species in Mexico. Management of agaves for this purpose has motivated domestication of some species and high phenotypic variation that commonly causes uncertainty about the taxonomic identity of varieties traditionally managed by people. This study assumed that varieties of crop species continually arise from mutations, sexual reproduction and hybridization, among other processes, and some of them are favoured and maintained by humans. Identifying these varieties may be difficult and a challenging issue for botanists and evolutionary biologists studying processes of domestication. Through a case study, we analysed the traditional varieties of agaves used to produce pulque in Michoacán, Mexico. We aimed at identifying the varieties, analysing the relatedness among them and developing a methodological approach that could help solve taxonomic problems and study variation under domestication of this and other plant groups. We documented (1) the traditional varieties of agave used and their identity, (2) how these varieties are perceived, used and managed by the local people and (3) how management influences phenotypic and genetic variation among varieties.
We interviewed pulque producers in two localities of the state of Michoacán, Mexico, where we recorded management practices of agaves, the traditional varieties used, the attributes characterizing those varieties, the varieties preferred by people, and features and mechanisms of selection. We conducted multivariate analyses of morphological features of the agave varieties, as well as genetic diversity and genetic distance studies among agave varieties through 11 nuclear microsatellites.
Seven traditional varieties of Agave were recorded in the study area. Multivariate analyses of morphology identified varieties belonging to the species A. salmiana, A. mapisaga and, presumably, A. americana. The preferred varieties have morphological features selected to make easier their management and produce higher sap yields. Genetic diversities (HE = 0. 470 to 0.594) were high compared with other Agave species with similar life history traits and use. Genetic distance analyses grouped the varieties “Verde” and “Negro” (identified as A. salmiana), whereas the varieties “Tarímbaro” and “Listoncillo” (identified as A. mapisaga) formed another group. The varieties “Blanco” and “Carrizaleño” (most probably being A. americana) clustered with varieties of A. salmiana, whereas the variety “Cenizo” appeared as a distinct group. Bayesian analysis indicated that most individuals of varieties of A. salmiana form a group and those of the varieties of A. mapisaga form another, whereas individuals of the varieties putatively belonging to A. americana clustered in similar proportions with both groups.
The traditional pulque production in the study area is an ongoing practice. It is still an important source of products for direct consumption by households and generation of economic incomes and as part of the cultural identity of local people. The most used traditional variety exhibited a marked gigantism, and although these agaves are mainly asexually propagated, populations have high genetic diversity. The local producers promote the maintenance of different traditional varieties. Our study shows the value of an integral research approach including ethnobiological, morphological and genetic information to clarify the state of variation influenced by humans on agaves, but it would be helpful to study other organisms under domestication. In addition, such approach would help to document human and non-human mechanisms generating crop varieties managed by local people.
KeywordsDomestication Fermented beverages Mesoamerica Pulque agaves Traditional knowledge
The genus Agave comprises 210 species belonging to the family Asparagaceae , naturally distributed from southern USA, Mexico, the Caribbean region, Central and northern South America to Colombia and Venezuela . Mexico is the centre of diversification and domestication of Agave, with 76% of the taxa described for this genus occurring in its territory, 61% of them being endemic [3, 4]. Agaves are mainly representative of arid and semiarid ecosystems, but they also occur in mountainous temperate humid and sub-humid areas [2, 3, 4, 5].
Because of their distribution, abundance and morphophysiological characteristics, agaves have been used by different human groups since prehistory [5, 6, 7, 8]. The main uses of these plants, documented by archaeologists, anthropologists and ethnobotanists include fibre (leaves), food (baked leaves, stems and stalks, and boiled and cooked flower buds), beverages (fresh sap: aguamiel, fermented sap: pulque and distilled must: mezcal), medicine (leaves), house construction (stalks) and live fences [6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
Archaeological studies in caves of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley revealed that agaves were among the main components of diet of the earliest hunter-gatherer people of the region. The remains recorded suggest this fact, since these include chewed fibre of agave identified in cave floors and in human coprolites from different stratigraphic levels representing different times of human occupation of the studied caves of the region, from 12,000 to 8 000 years before the present [6, 7, 8].
Use of agaves for preparing beverages derives from the extraction of the sap, which is traditionally called aguamiel. This practice could have originated from the observation of nature by people, since several animals, mainly rodents and lagomorphs, drink that sap of wild agaves excavating holes at the base of their lateral leaves [11, 12]; however, clear evidence of this use are lithic tools used to favour accumulation of sap for then extraction [13, 14, 15]. The oldest record of using agave sap by Mesoamerican peoples is a scraper piece of obsidian (a concave instrument used for scraping the apical meristem for allowing the accumulation of sap) which is nearly 2 300 years of antiquity. It was found in Huapalcalco, in the current state of Hidalgo, central Mexico [12, 15]. Although this record does not allow inferring about fermentation techniques, it makes possible identifying that extraction and consumption of aguamiel was systematic at that time.
Pulque is the name of the beverage resulting from the fermentation of aguamiel, which is carried out by microorganisms naturally associated to the sap, like lactic acid bacteria and yeasts [16, 17, 18, 19]. A simple storing of sap determines its fermentation into pulque in one or two days; therefore, the early use of aguamiel could have been associated to preparation of pulque. In the archaeological site of Teotihuacán, in central México, organic residuals recorded in pottery are evidence of storing and consumption of fermented sap in habitational complexes of the city, approximately between 1730 and 1450 years before the present [20, 21]. In addition, there is pictographic evidence of the extraction of sap and consumption of pulque in pre-Columbian and Colonial documents. In “La Relación de Michoacán” (Chronicles of Michoacán) , a document of the XVI Century, the history and traditions of the ancient habitants of southwestern Mexico are recapitulated. In that document, two paintings can be found representing the pulque agaves and the extraction of sap by the P’urhépecha people.
According to Colunga-GarcíaMarín et al. , 41 Agave taxa (species and intraspecific botanical categories) have been recorded to be used for extracting aguamiel and producing pulque in México. The information about agave management is relevant for analzing their role in past and current societies, particularly the human practices and decisions to transform, adjust, maintain or recover resources according to cultural purposes [24, 25]. Such information allows identifying that their recurrent management may lead to domestication, a process through which organisms experience phenotypic and genotypic changes, as a consequence of differential reproduction of individuals favoured by humans through conscious or unconscious selection . Phenotypic attributes differentiating domesticated organisms from their wild ancestors were recognized by Darwin [27, 28], and more recently, several authors have called them domestication syndrome [29, 30]. The domestication syndrome in agaves has been influenced by human selection directed to favour features for different purposes. For instance, larger plant size favours increasing amount of edible matter and sap, while larger leaves favour increasing the amount of fibre . In addition, people may favour features like decreasing the number and size of spines and removing irritating secondary metabolites, which makes easier the management of agave plants [31, 32, 33].
At least 10 species and subspecies of agaves were domesticated in Mexico, and the continuous management by traditional handlers in different regions has generated numerous traditional varieties of these plants, which have not been clearly described or classified [9, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Traditional varieties are those variants of crops that are recognized, named, managed, propagated and preserved by the local producers and smallholders. These varieties are strongly associated with the knowledge of the producers, specific uses and purposes, but whose formal taxonomic identity is in some cases unclear. These are commonly intraspecific categories, but some of them are probably of inter-varietal or interspecific hybrid origin. Therefore, we focused our attention to characterize the agave varieties of a particular area, based on morphological, genetic and ethnobiological approaches [37, 38, 39]. In this study, we make use of the term traditional varieties to distinguish them from varieties and cultivar categories defined by the formal plant taxonomy.
In species and traditional varieties of agaves used for sap consumption, the features favoured by human selection are (1) larger amount and quality of sap (higher content of sugars), (2) gigantism of the plant size, which is related with production of a higher amount of sap, (3) decreasing number and size of spines and leave teeth, (4) low concentrations of saponins and (5) high production of vegetative propagules to make easier and more intensive cultivation of the desirable phenotypes [9, 31, 32, 33, 40, 41].
A study that illustrates how complex the traditional varieties of agave may be was that by Mora-López et al. , who evaluated the morphometry of species of the Section Salmianae, considering varieties of Agave macroculmis Tod, A. mapisaga Trel. and A. salmiana Otto ex Salm, in the Altiplano Meridional (Southern Highlands) of the Central-Northern region of México. These authors recorded 62 traditional varieties of agave, with A. mapisaga having plants with the largest size and lowest number and size of teeth, while A. macroculmis had the lowest size and greater teeth number and size, and A. salmiana had the highest morphological variation.
The state of Michoacán is the setting of the traditional preparation of pulque by the Puhrépecha and offers an interesting cultural area for studying variation of agaves associated to ancient management. The species most widely used for producing pulque are A. salmiana, A. mapisaga, A. americana L. and A. hookeri Jacobi. The latter species is endemic of the region, but it is rarely used at present; it can be found at low densities in live fences and its use is considered almost lost [5, 9]. Recent studies identified that A. hookeri shows clear signs of domestication, notably gigantism, and loss of genetic variation compared with its putative wild ancestor A. inaequidens Koch [31, 32].
The intensive management of agaves for producing pulque and other purposes has motivated human selection and domestication determining high morphophysiological variation that frequently causes uncertainty about the taxonomic identity of the traditional varieties of agave. Identifying traditional varieties is part of the process of understanding how those varieties are associated to human management. In agaves, as in all crop species, domestication continually generates new varieties, but sometimes it is difficult to know their nature and their relation to cultural values . Therefore, identifying affinities of traditional varieties to some species may allow explaining their origin and relations, which is in turn important for characterizing and managing genetic resources.
Genetic diversity of agave populations is generally high, whereas genetic differentiation is low . But patterns vary depending on their natural history, as well as their type of use, management and domestication. One of the extreme cases is the almost null genetic variation in the intensive managed Agave tequilana Weber, which contrasts with the high levels of genetic variation exhibited by populations or their wild relatives in forests and those maintained in agroforestry systems [34, 44]. For some agaves, used for producing pulque, studies have reported low genetic diversity, high structure and low gene flow [32, 45], and all these patterns are possibly responses to selection favouring certain phenotypes, vegetative propagation and limited sexual reproduction . Biological populations differentiate according to the types and frequencies of alleles and genotypes. Such differentiation is called genetic structure. It is particularly high when gen flow among populations is low. Parameter FST evaluates structure in a range of values between 0 and 1, the minimum and maximum values of differentiation or structure, respectively. The populations studied differentiating between 0 and 0.05 represent very low structure, those between 0.05 and 0.15 express moderate structure, and those between 0.15 and 0.25 have high, whereas those > 0.25 have very high structure [46, 47].
The ancient and current processes of domestication of agaves have determined progressive diversification, which in addition to hybridisation and local adaptation have contributed to generate complexes of phenotypic variation, whose taxonomic identity is commonly difficult to characterize. According to the use of agaves, the domestication syndrome may have different expressions, which may leave prints of past or current processes of human selection and may be helpful for characterizing the potential of genetic resources. Such situation makes necessary to carry out efforts for identifying specific and intraspecific taxa, documenting the state of variation and the evolutionary relations among taxa, in order to understand the origin of such variation, the natural and human factors influencing it and the optimum conditions for designing strategies of conservation of genetic resources considering all such factors.
The aims of this study are to (1) document ethnobotanical aspects on use of traditional varieties of agaves and preparation of pulque in localities of Michoacán, central Mexico, (2) document the perception of the agave varieties by local people, their particular attributes, management types and mechanisms of selection and maintenance and (3) characterize morphological and genetic similarities of the agave varieties, and a more precise characterization of the domestication syndrome of these plants. We hypothesized that phenotypical features resulting from human selection are reflected in the traditional varieties recognized by local people based on their attributes, forms of use and management types. In addition, the varieties more intensely managed would exhibit the clearest features of domestication syndrome.
Materials and methods
Agave salmiana belongs to the section Salmianae, which is widely cultivated in the states of Tlaxcala, Michoacán, Aguascalientes, San Luis Potosí, Hidalgo, Oaxaca and Puebla. In the latter states, it is possible to find small wild individuals that are likely ancestors of the crops. Agave mapisaga is larger than A. salmiana, and it is common to find them growing together. It is mainly found in the states of México, Morelos, Puebla, Michoacán and Zacatecas, but in addition, we have registered it in the states of Hidalgo and Tlaxcala. Agave americana is found in the states of Nuevo León, Michoacán and Oaxaca. Because these species are cultivated together, hybridization among the cultivars is likely. The propagation of these species is mainly vegetative through suckering rhizomes or by sprouts in the corm. Sexual reproduction is limited or null, since people cut the apical meristem to harvest the sap, thus preventing the development of the inflorescence . These three species are widely cultivated [5, 10].
The other locality is Santiago Undameo (SU), located in the municipality of Morelia at the southwest of the city (Fig. 1), where annual temperature is on average 17 °C, and precipitation 800–1000 mm per year, with a rainy season from May to October . Human activities are predominantly agriculture, farming fields and pastures for livestock, and cultivation of agave for preparing pulque.
Both communities studied are the main providers of pulque to the city of Morelia. It is particularly important to study management of agaves and pulque in this region because it has been insufficiently studied compared to the production systems of pulque in other parts of central Mexico. We centered our attention on local varieties of some Agave species or interspecific hybrids to develop a methodological approach helpful for studying other species of Agave and crop plants.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with most of the pulque producers in the villages studied (seven in T and five in SU), which allowed documenting management systems of pulque agaves, description of the traditional agave varieties, characterizing their distinctive features, and the quality and quantity of their sap, as well as the management of the sap to prepare pulque.
We measured 72 agaves of different traditional varieties. These plants were selected according to their development stage, all of them mature agaves ready to extract their sap, identified according to the criteria of the local producers. Then, 12 measurements were conducted in vegetative parts following Figueredo et al. , and eight relations among some variables were estimated. In total, 20 morphological characters were analyzed. The closest taxonomic identity was approached based on the taxonomic keys developed by Gentry .
Tests of normality and variance equality were performed for all datasets, and based on such tests, we decided to perform non-parametric analyses (Kruskal Wallis test) and paired comparison through IBM-SPSS Statistics 22, in order to identify how morphological characters studied differed between the varieties studied. Principal component (PCA) and cluster (CA) analyses were carried out, with the purpose of classifying the sampled populations and individual plants. We used the software R (v. 3.5.0), and because of differences associated to the type of character and the measurement units of the variables, we standardized the data matrix using the function scale (mean-centering). In addition, Bootstrapping was carried out to evaluate the optimum number of clusters and the cohesion between them, represented by the Jaccard index (0 represents a null cohesion and 1 a high cohesion).
Characteristics of the 11 nuclear microsatellites used in genetics analysis for species domesticated agave in the state of Michoacán, Mexico
Allele size range (bp)
Parker et al. 2014 
Lindsay et al. 2012 
Cabrera-Toledo et al. unpublished data
Ethnobotany of agave management
Characteristics of the traditional varieties of agaves identified by producers in the state of Michoacán
Traditional variety name
Location (measured plants)
It is the most widely used variety, for the quantity and quality of its sap, produces on average 3 L a day, for 4 months and is valued for the high sweetness of its sap. This maguey exceeds 2 m in height, is leafy, with broad leaves and mostly grooved towards the tip, and has lateral spaced teeth and a prominent terminal thorn. Its coloration is an intense green and is very abundant in both locations.
SU and T (n = 17)
Agave salmiana var. salmiana Álvarez-Ríos collection 7, 8
It is a variety recognized by the attributes that are similar to “Verde” variety; it is only distinguished because it has a darker green coloration. Just one producer identifies it in SU, the rest do not distinguish between “Verde” and “Negro” variety.
SU (n = 18)
A. salmiana var. salmiana Álvarez-Ríos collection 9, 10
This variety is little used in SU, so its abundance is reduced, producers say that the sap is not as sweet as Verde variety, but produces more, about four liters on average per day. It is larger and reaches 3 m high; its leaves are thin and long, so they lose rigidity. The lateral teeth are small and seem to disappear. It receives the name of Tarímbaro since according to the producers this variety was brought from that locality.
SU (n = 2)
A. mapisaga var. mapisaga Álvarez-Ríos collection 13, 14
This variety is not abundant in SU, only two individuals were registered. It is little used since it is affirmed that the sap is insipid and the produced pulque is not so good. This variety has a grayish appearance, hence the name "Cenizo." It is smaller than other varieties, and it does not reach 2 m high, with small erect leaves; it has big lateral teeth with a hook shape. It produces one and a half liters per day.
SU (n = 2)
Most probably A. americana var. americana Álvarez-Ríos collection 1, 2
Its characteristics are the same as “Tarímbaro” variety. People name it “Listoncillo,” because of its length, it is thin, and its fallen leaves, which resemble a ribbon. Producers also claim that their sap is less sweet than “Verde” variety, it gives 4 L on average per day for five months. In T, it is as abundant as “Verde” variety; it is common to find exclusive accumulations of this variety.
T (n = 27)
A. mapisaga var. mapisaga Álvarez-Ríos collection 11, 12
It is a grayish variety, with slightly grooved and erect leaves. It exceeds two meters in height, its lateral teeth are hooked and has a big terminal spine. It is less used than “Verde” and “Listoncillo” variety because the aguamiel is not as rich (tasty), since for producers it is less sweet. It produces one and a half liters per day.
T (n = 2)
Most probably A. americana var. americana Álvarez-Ríos collection 5, 6
It is a grayish agave, with slightly flat and erect leaves that have a peculiar widening in the middle part. It is about 2 m high, without being leafy. They are particularly fibrous, as a person interviewed said "they are very hard, they are like reeds," hence their name. It has hooked lateral teeth. Its sap is very sweet at the beginning of production, but after a month and a half or 2 months, according to people interviewed, it becomes insipid "it becomes like water". This is the variety that is in lowest proportion in T. It produces one and a half liters per day.
T (n = 4)
Most probably A. americana var. americana Álvarez-Ríos collection 3, 4
The pulque producers never collect the seeds of agave to propagate them, and it is rare to let the agaves bloom, as people interviewed said “... only [they leave standing] some agaves forgotten...” since using the agaves the inflorescences have to be removed before their development. According to people, only agaves occurring in areas of difficult access, or those that are unnoticed, or those deliberately left to develop flowers and fruits may bloom. The pulque producers affirm that an agave is ready to produce pulque when it is 8 to 10 years old. This can be distinguished by indicators such as the thinning of the apical meristem, “the maguey heart (central apex) becomes very thin;” the leaves furthest from the meristem become expanded while those closer enclose the meristem. The pulque producers interviewed describe this stage saying that “the maguey starts to be like a sponge.” Other producers identify this stage based on the number and size of leaves. For instance, one person interviewed said: “you can see when it is good to produce because it has exceptionally large leaves, it is well leafless and then you count the leaves, if they are 40 it is already good.”
Sap extraction is carried out when an agave is mature, and at that stage, the apical meristem is cut off, generating a cavity where the sap flows and accumulates. The producers firstly remove a couple of leaves to make easier the access to the centre of the plant, then they cut the edges of the adjacent leaves to avoid scratches with the lateral teeth. Following this procedure, the meristem is cut from the union with the first leaves, then excavated to form the cavity called “cajete” (Fig. 4b–d). When the cajete is ready, it is covered with the cut leaves and stones; the collection of sap starts during the days after this activity (Fig. 4e).
The aguamiel is collected with a plastic cup and then poured in a bucket. After each event of sap collection, it is necessary to scrape the cajete with a tool called “raspador,” which is a sharp metal spoon used to remove the tissue that forms as a scar (Fig. 4f–h). Producing this injury to the plant allows the sap flowing to be collected. In the first days of this activity, the sap is scarce, people interviewed said that “it produces just a small glass,” which is not consumed because people say it is bitter, but after 3 days the sap increases its volume and quality. An agave may produce 2.5 to 4 L per day, for 3 months on average, and up to 5 months the larger plants. The agave produces aguamiel until it dries; this is when all the leaves lose their turgidity and wither and the sap stops flowing.
Some producers carry out agaves scraping and collecting of their sap once or twice per day during the dry season (March to May); they consider it is better to extract twice per day because heat accelerates the process of fermentation of the sap and it may become sour when stored, but during the cold season (from November to February) they do not have this problem. Producers who collect agave sap once per day carry out this activity in the morning, from 05:00 to 07:00, while people who collect twice per day carry out the second sap collecting in the afternoon, from 17:00 to 19:00.
According to producers interviewed, the best time for pulque production is the dry season (from October to April), because during the rainy season (May to September) water may infiltrate the agave tissue and that condition decreases the quality of the sap to be fermented and the quality of pulque flavour. During the rainy season, the producers tie a plastic cover over the agaves to prevent that water introduces into the cavity where the sap accumulates.
Each producer has 10 to 15 agaves producing at the same time, from these agaves in total they extract on average 32 ± 2.7 L in T (n = 7) and 27 ± 2.2 L in SU (n = 5) per day during the dry season. While in the rainy season in SU people only extract 10 to 15 L per day, until the plants stop producing aguamiel. In T, the producers interviewed said to extract about 10 L less than in the dry season, but all of them continued the activity in both seasons.
After sap is collected, it is transported to the producers’ houses, into spaces specially destined to the elaboration of pulque. The elaboration of pulque in T occurs in fresh rooms, with little exposure to sunlight, and people consider it convenient to maintain low temperatures for a good preservation of the beverage. People maintain the “pie de pulque” (“foot of pulque”), which is the remaining sediment from pulque prepared the day before, generally less than 1 L, which is used for enhancing. A woman interviewed said that she adds foot of pulque since with it “the aguamiel works faster and makes pulque tastier.” According to the producers, after 3 h of fermentation, the pulque is ready to be consumed (Fig. 4i).
In SU after collected, aguamiel is strained and placed in a pot over a fire, to give it a slight boil (no more than one minute). As soon as the aguamiel begins boiling, people remove it from the heat and let it cool for an hour, then mix it with the foot of pulque. The drink is fermented for a couple of hours, the effervescence takes place and after 2 h it is considered that the pulque is ready to be consumed. According to pulque producers of SU, the sap generates an irritation called “carame,” then by boiling the aguamiel they avoid that irritation.
Once the pulque is ready to be consumed, the producers sell it in their homes or in the tianguis (itinerant markets) or established markets. The average price is $20 pesos (nearly 1 U.S. dollar) per L in SU and $16 pesos for T (nearly 0.8 U. S. dollars) per L (Fig. 4j).
Morphological variation of agaves
The interviews allowed identifying the following traditional varieties of agave: “Verde,” “Negro,” “Tarímbaro,” and “Cenizo” in SU and “Verde,” “Listoncillo,” “Blanco,” and “Carrizaleño” in T (Table 2, Fig. 3). The most used variety of agave in SU is the “Verde,” while in T the most used are the “Verde” and the “Listoncillo.” The varieties “Cenizo” and “Tarímbaro” in SU, and the “Blanco” and “Carrizaleño” in T, are used in smaller proportion, because the sap of these varieties is less valued than that of the other varieties, also because plants of these varieties are perceived to have higher dentition. However, people said they use these varieties when the preferred ones are scarce.
Table 2 summarizes data for the characters measured in the seven traditional varieties identified. For all the characters, we found significant differences between the varieties (p ≤ 0.001). The main trends were a greater general size of plants (GLP), greater average diameter (D) and leaf length (LL) of the “Tarímbaro” and “Listoncillo” varieties. Differences between these varieties for the 20 characteristics analyzed were not significant, suggesting that they both correspond to the same species, according to the general morphology, A. mapisaga. var. mapisaga (the rosettes are nearly 3 m in height, and the diameter of up to 4 m, the leaves are linear with a length greater than 2 m). These varieties are followed in size by the “Verde” and “Negro” varieties, which, according to the comparisons, were not significantly different among themselves, and whose general morphology corresponds to A. salmiana var. salmiana (the leaves are lanceolate, the rosette small, with large teeth). A noticeable difference of these varieties with those of A. mapisaga var. mapisaga is that leaves are significantly wider (LW).
We found that the varieties “Cenizo,” “Blanco” and “Carrizaleño” have characters like leaf width (LW), leaf length (LL) and general plant length (GPL) resembling A. salmiana var. salmiana, but other characters such as the shape of leaves, dentition, terminal thorn length (TTL) and plant colour are similar to A. americana var. americana
Regarding characters associated with dentition, even when A. mapisaga var. mapisaga exhibited more teeth, which is associated with the larger size of its leaves, these teeth and the terminal spine were smaller than those of the other varieties. The terminal spine of A. salmiana var. salmiana was longer, with more and larger teeth than all agaves here studied, while A. americana has large teeth, but more spaced among them along the margin of the leaf, exhibiting strong differences in these characters with A. mapisaga var. mapisaga.
Based on the analyses carried out and the review of taxonomic descriptions , we can say that the varieties “Listoncillo” and “Tarímbaro” may belong to Agave mapisaga var. mapisaga. It is the species of the genus with the largest sized individuals, characterized for its elongated and generally folded leaves, as well as small lateral teeth ranging from 2 to 5 mm in length . The varieties “Verde” and “Negro” may be Agave salmiana var. salmiana; although the varieties are identified as different due to their colour, the morphometry of the plants is similar to A. salmiana var. salmiana, which is characterized by its large size, although smaller than A. mapisaga, a spaced dentition and the peculiar shape of its leaves: broad, convex at the base and concave upward with the sigmoid curved apex .
Regarding the rest of the varieties used in the area, the taxonomic identification does not correspond clearly with features of Agave americana, which according to Gentry  has lanceolate leaves, narrowed towards the base, rounded down, which from the upper 2/3 of the leaves these tend to flatten and are firm, thick, straight and ascending; it has lateral teeth in a remarkable hook and terminal thorn of 3 to 6 cm in length, in addition to its glaucous tones. With the features listed above and the analyses carried out, we propose that the varieties “Blanco,” “Carrizaleño” and “Cenizo” correspond to Agave americana but not clearly defined.
Vegetative morphological characteristics and genetic diversity of the seven traditional varieties of agaves, identified by producers in the localities of Santiago Undameo and Tarímbaro, Michoacán
A. salmiana var. salmiana
A. mapisaga var. mapisaga
Most probably A. americana var. americana
General plant lenght (GPL)
209.18 ± 4.12a
214.17 ± 5.87a
269.00 ± 11.00ab
274.68 ± 4.31b
238.00 ± 12.00ab
167.00 ± 13.00a
218.00 ± 10.17ab
Stem lenght (SL)
74.06 ± 3.63a
80.44 ± 3.67ab
67.50 ± 2.50abc
66.00 ± 2.36bc
55.00 ± 7.00abc
50.50 ± 5.50abc
46.25 ± 3.12c
Mean diameter of the plant (D)
296.82 ± 12.31ac
294.06 ± 8.28ac
411.75 ± 42.25b
363.57 ± 13.88b
392.00 ± 9.50b
266.25 ± 3.75 ac
257.63 ± 18.90c
Leaf lenght (LL)
153.21 ± 3.66a
137.06 ± 5.79a
203.00 ± 19.00ab
229.32 ± 3.74b
168.50 ± 2.50ab
125.50 ± 9.50a
167.75 ± 6.28ab
Leaf width at middle (LW)
26.50 ± 0.40a
27.17 ± 0.63a
24.00 ± 0.00ab
22.69 ± 0.46b
29.50 ± 0.50ab
21.50 ± 0.50ab
27.75 ± 2.29ab
5.79 ± 0.12a
5.10 ± 0.24a
8.46 ± 0.79ab
10.26 ± 0.30b
5.71 ± 0.01ab
5.85 ± 0.58ab
6.18 ± 0.58ab
2.12 ± 0.07a
1.75 ± 0.10abc
3.02 ± 0.39abcd
3.57 ± 0.10c
3.11 ± 0.35abcd
2.49 ± 0.08abcd
3.68 ± 0.31d
Terminal thorn length (TTL)
7.30 ± 0.24a
6.87 ± 0.18a
3.88 ± 0.12abc
3.29 ± 0.07b
4.13 ± 0.62abc
3.34 ± 0.34abc
3.26 ± 0.11c
Terminal thorn width at the base (TTW)
1.09 ± 0.03a
1.17 ± 0.04ad
0.57 ± 0.01b
0.70 ± 0.02cb
1.13 ± 0.12abcd
0.65 ± 0.02abcd
0.68 ± 0.03bcd
6.75 ± 0.28a
6.00 ± 0.28a
6.81 ± 0.03ab
4.78 ± 0.14b
3.76 ± 0.96ab
5.18 ± 0.65ab
4.85 ± 0.25ab
0.05 ± 0.00 a
0.05 ± 0.00 a
0.02 ± 0.00 ab
0.01 ± 0.00 b
0.03 ± 0.00 ab
0.03 ± 0.00 ab
0.02 ± 0.00 ab
Total number of teeth (TEET)
38.94 ± 3.39 a
33.50 ± 1.07 a
65.50 ± 1.50 ab
79.19 ± 2.56 b
37.00 ± 1.00 ab
36.50 ± 3.50 ab
35.75 ± 1.80 a
0.26 ± 0.02 ac
0.27 ± 0.01 ac
0.33 ± 0.02 ab
0.35 ± 0.01 b
0.22 ± 0.00 abc
0.29 ± 0.01 abc
0.21 ± 0.01 c
Number of teeth in 10 cm2 (TEE10)
3.00 ± 0.17 ac
3.11 ± 0.11 ac
4.00 ± 1.00 ab
4.03 ± 0.26 ab
2.00 ± 0.00 c
3.00 ± 0.00 abcd
2.50 ± 0.29 cd
Teeth length (LTEE)
1.45 ± 0.06a
1.82 ± 0.07abc
1.06 ± 0.28abc
1.32 ± 0.07bc
2.39 ± 0.06abc
1.19 ± 0.05abc
1.00 ± 0.25c
0.01 ± 0.0001ab
0.014 ± 0.002bd
0.005 ± 0.001abcd
0.006 ± 0.00c
0.014 ± 0.00abcd
0.01 ± 0.002abcd
0.006 ± 0.002d
Teeth width (WTEE)
0.58 ± 0.04a
0.57 ± 0.02a
0.31 ± 0.07ab
0.32 ± 0.02 b
0.80 ± 0.08a
0.60 ± 0.11ab
0.70 ± 0.08a
2.64 ± 0.19abc
3.25 ± 0.11 ac
3.38 ± 0.16abc
4.20 ± 0.18 b
3.00 ± 0.23abc
2.05 ± 0.30abc
1.54 ± 0.51abc
Distance between teeth (DTEE)
2.05 ± 0.14a
1.78 ± 0.11a
1.16 ± 0.29ab
1.15 ± 0.09b
3.02 ± 0.25ab
3.33 ± 0.61ab
4.41 ± 0.65a
0.01 ± 0.00a
0.01 ± 0.00a
0.01 ± 0.00ab
0.01 ± 0.00b
0.02 ± 0.00ab
0.03 ± 0.01a
0.03 ± 0.00a
Effective number of alleles (AE)
2.230 ± 0.273
2.183 ± 0.313
2.079 ± 0.166
2.739 ± 0.261
1.661 ± 0.321
1.667 ± 0.389
2.316 ± 0.397
Observed heterozygosity (HO)
0.602 ± 0.120
0.586 ± 0.118
0.682 ± 0.102
0.645 ± 0.108
0.364 ± 0.136
0.364 ± 0.136
0.439 ± 0.128
Expected heterozygosity (HE)
0.473 ± 0.070
0.445 ± 0.075
0.477 ± 0.055
0.583 ± 0.062
0.295 ± 0.090
0.364 ± 0.090
0.403 ± 0.102
The expected heterozygosity (HE) levels ranged from 0.117 to 0.827 for the ten polymorphic loci. A. mapisaga var. mapisaga exhibited the highest value of HE with a value of 0.586 ± 0.063, followed by the supposed A. americana with an average value of 0.527 ± 0.073 and A. salmiana var. salmiana with 0.470 ± 0.075, the trends being similar at the level of varieties of A. salmiana var. salmiana and A. mapisaga var. mapisaga, and a decrease in the levels of this parameter was observed in the varieties of the varieties that we consider most likely to be A. americana (Table 3).
The analysis of Bayesian grouping indicates that the most likely genetic groups is K = 2, with most individuals of the varieties of A. salmiana var. salmiana assigned to the green colour genetic group, and the varieties of A. mapisaga var. mapisaga forming the red colour group. For the three varieties considered closely related to A. americana, the assignment to a specific group is unclear, and individuals have similar percentages for red and green groups (Fig. 6b).
Results of this study indicate that there are differential management practices of agaves, as well as in the extraction of aguamiel and pulque production among the localities studied. The seven traditional varieties are maintained in different proportions in the production units due to their morphological characteristics and the quality of their sap. The agaves exhibit gigantism and certain characteristics related to the spines and dentition, which correspond to the features selected for their use and management. In addition, the varieties showed genetic patterns related to the degree of management and domestication as discussed in the following sections.
Selection and maintenance of traditional varieties of Agave
Out of the seven traditional varieties of pulque agaves reported for both communities, only one is shared among them: “Verde” (A. salmiana), the most abundant variety because of the following reasons: (1) the producers of both communities perceive it as the variety that produces the best quality of sap (sweetest), (2) it produces high volumes of sap (3 L per plant per day) and (3) it has successful vegetative reproduction, producing many clones in short time.
In other regions of Mexico, a high number of traditional varieties of agave for pulque production are also reported. In Nanacamilpa and Calpulalpan, in the western region of the state of Tlaxcala, ten traditional varieties of agaves were reported by Álvarez-Ríos , Álvarez-Duarte et al. , Reyes-Agüero et al. , seven for A. salmiana and three of A. mapisaga. In that region, producers prefer traditional varieties of A. salmiana because they consider their sap to be the one with the highest quality and sweeter [60, 61]. In the Hñähñu region of the state of Hidalgo, Reyes-Agüero et al.  reported 16 traditional varieties, nine correspond to A. salmiana var. salmiana, four to A. salmiana subsp. crassispina and three to A. mapisaga. Also, in the latter region, A. salmiana var. salmiana is the most used specie to produce pulque, because varieties of this specie have a faster development to produce sap (6 to 8 years) than other varieties and species (e.g., 10 years for A. mapisaga). In addition, the traditional varieties of A. salmiana produce a high volume of sap, for instance, Reyes-Agüero et al.  reports that the largest variety “Max'o'uada” (2.7 m GPL) produce 10 L per day.
Similarly, in both localities of this study, the producers maintain other varieties of agave different from those of A. salmiana, and this is for different reasons. In the case of “Listoncillo” and “Tarimbaro” (A. mapisaga), although the sap of these varieties is of lower quality according to the perception of the producers (less sweet), these plants produce a higher volume of sap (4 L per plant per day) than those of A. salmiana. This is because they are varieties of greater dimensions (GPL, D, LL) and therefore with higher volumes of sap. This complementary presence of A. mapisaga in pulque production systems is also observed in the regions of Hidalgo and Tlaxcala, where it is common to find traditional varieties of this species, although with smaller abundances because these are less valued and used [61, 62].
In the case of the varieties “Blanco,” “Carrizaleño” and “Cenizo” (most probably A. americana var. americana), the producers maintain only few individuals of these varieties because they produce smaller volumes of sap (1.5 L per plant per day) of lower quality (less sweet to producers' perception) than the other varieties. However, with their maintenance, they are available and used when the other varieties become scarce, functioning as reserve of plant resources when the producers do not have other varieties ready to produce. The other reason for maintaining these varieties is teething (TTL, TTW, WTEE, LTEE), so these plants function as excellent living fences, delimiting and protecting terrains, crops and other agave varieties with less teething. This is an extended use in different regions of Mexico, using different Agave species, such as Agave karwinskii Zucc., A. rhodacantha Trel. and A. fourcroydes Lem, as well as those identified in this study [10, 63, 64, 65].
Producers maintain several varieties of pulque agaves because due to their properties these varieties have particular roles. The multipurpose use of agaves has been described in other rural systems in Mexico. For instance, Torres et al.  reported 22 categories of use for this genus, and in the systems where agaves are found, they have a structural, ecological-functional and utilitarian roles, satisfying multiple needs.
Morphological-genetic variation and domestication of Agave
The identification of varieties in the studied communities accounts for the in situ maintenance of the diversity existing in this group of plants, as well as the importance of these for the communities. The traditional varieties most commonly used correspond to A. salmiana var. salmiana and A. mapisaga var. mapisaga, which are the largest sized varieties producing greater volume and sweeter sap, traits considered expressions of the domestication syndromes in the genus. Similar patterns were registered by Alfaro et al.  and by Mora-López et al.  for varieties of A. mapisaga the main agave crop used for preparing pulque, together with A. salmiana var. salmiana which has high morphological variation. In counterpart, the less used varieties are agaves identified most probably as Agave americana, which have smaller size, lower quantity and quality of their sap and whose morphological features make it difficult to handle them.
It is still necessary to conduct studies about the sweetness of the sap, to corroborate if the species and varieties mostly used produce sap with a higher content of sugars than those less used taxa. Also, more studies are needed to corroborate that saponins decrease as part of the domestication syndromes.
The cross amplification of the 11 nuclear microsatellites was viable for the species and varieties studied in this research. We find levels of genetic diversity that are in the registered range for other agaves, with the same molecular marker and similar life history characteristics. These are the cases of Agave utahensis subsp. utahensis Engelm. (HE = 0.4905) and A. utahensis subsp. kaibabensis (HE = 0.4081), distributed in the Mojave Desert and the Colorado Plateau in the Southwestern United States, which reproduce asexually . In A. hookeri, a species used in the Purhépecha Plateau region for producing pulque, we reported values of genetic variation close to those reported in this study (HE = 0.485), besides the fixation of heterozygotes , as a characteristic that distinguishes species under artificial selection, where some individuals (varieties or morphotypes) could show advantages over other genotypes [32, 35].
For the three species studied in Michoacán, the way of propagation is mainly asexual; however, the values were high compared to those registered for other species used to produce pulque, but with different molecular marker. Microsatellites are codominant and polymorphic molecular markers, and the sample size in this study is relatively small, and these could be the reason why we found high levels of genetic diversity. In fact, the results found for the putative Agave americana may be due to possible hybridization events, which has been mentioned as a common process in the genus Agave . We do not rule out this possibility because eventually some individuals may “scape” from being used and having sexual reproduction; nevertheless, the possible hybrids should be still corroborated through experimental crosses. It is also pertinent to perform analyzes with conserved genome regions that would allow to establish the relationships between these varieties.
In this sense, it is important to emphasize that the exclusively vegetative propagation can lead to dramatic cases such as the “Blue agave” (A. tequilana var. azul), which due to the tequila-mezcal boom of the last decades, has led to its very low genetic diversity as a consequence of vegetative propagation through suckers. Trejo et al.  reported a diversity of zero in the intensive plantations of this agave in Tequila, Jalisco. Although the vegetative propagation allows an exponential increase in the size of the agave crops, taken to the extreme, it can generate problems in the genetic diversity of the populations, since it has a very limited range to generate genetic variability, which results in an offspring of genetically identical individuals, making them vulnerable to changes in weather conditions or the incidence of more aggressive pests .
In the studied communities, the inclusion of different varieties of pulque agaves inside a parcel, fence or patch may favour the reduction of the risk due to pests or diseases, associated with the reduction of genetic diversity in populations propagated by asexual methods.
The handling of pulque in Michoacán is a current activity with cultural and economic importance to people interviewed. Local households directly consume maize, beans and fodder they produce. Livestock (cows or sheep) are used as meat during feasts or are commercialized for attending emergencies. Producing pulque offers direct benefits through its direct consumption and as a source of economic income to the families that sell the product. Everyday people sell pulque, on average 30 L per day that is 600 Mexican pesos, nearly 30 US dollars.
The most used varieties showed gigantism of the whole plant and reduction of dentition and spikiness; these tendencies are apparently result of the human selection favouring plants with these characters in greater frequency. However, the differences in the observed characteristics could be partly due to the intrinsic characteristics of each species, not only human selection. It would be recommendable, for instance, to make comparisons with the closest wild relatives of the Salmianae group (e.g. A. salmiana ssp. crassispina or A. macroculmis), to a better understanding of tendencies of the domestication syndrome in these species. This analysis is difficult for A. mapisaga since its wild ancestors remain uncertain.
Despite the vegetative reproduction of the species studied, the levels of genetic diversity were high, which may be the result of intrinsic characteristics of the species, and this genetic diversity is maintained and promoted by the management practices of maguey producers, which consist in introducing plants from other areas, which, together with the eventual sexual reproduction, enrich and maintain the diverse genetic pool in their productive systems. Although pulque producers distinguish several varieties, our morphometric and genetic studies allow identifying that Agave salmiana and A. mapisaga remain as discrete taxonomic units (species). For the varieties that were assigned to A. americana, the taxonomic identity is not clear enough and the morphology separates them as a discrete group, but the genetic information keeps these varieties as a diffuse group.
A detailed study of other phenotypic characteristics and regions of the genome that are under selection would allow to appreciate other trends of domestication in this group of plants.
Integrating studies on management and human selection influencing variation, as well as morphological and genetic characterization of such variation is crucial for understanding the nature and correct identification of variants of Agave species like those documented in this study and that are common in other species and species complexes of this genus.
We consider relevant the peculiar way of elaboration of pulque in SU where the sap is boiled before the elaboration of pulque; it is necessary to carry out chemical and microbiological studies to analyze the effects of this practice on the drink. It is necessary to make further studies on pulque handling and the production system in SU, since it has unusual features compared with other pulque production systems in Mexico.
The authors thank people of the communities where the studies were carried out. Their hospitality and kindness made easier the hard fieldwork, and their knowledge about the studied resources was crucial for us to understand many aspects of our research. We also thank Lucía Pérez-Volkow, Paulina Camorlinga and Cesar I. Ojeda-Linares for their valuable help in the fieldwork.
GDAR designed a methodological approach to the ethnobotanical study, did the fieldwork, analyzed the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. FPT helped in field and the standardization and analysis of genetics, as well as in data capture and analysis of morphological data. CJFU designed a methodological approach to the morphological and genetic study, did the fieldwork, analyzed the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. AC conceived and designed the study, wrote and edited the manuscript, and got financial support for carrying out the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was financed by the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM, the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) which provided a grant for postgraduate studies of the first author, and financial support from the research project CONACYT/ A1-S-14306. Also, the authors thank financial support from the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT, research project IN206217 and IN206520).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
At the beginning of the research, we established contact with authorities and persons of the communities, to whom we presented the study project, its aims and methods and asked their permit to conduct it. Then, we explained more detail and asked their consent to people who in the first step accepted to collaborate with us. All information obtained (written testimonies, audios, photography, plants measured in the field, and collecting of tissue samples of agaves for genetic studies) were previously asked to people and conducted only after their acceptance.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.García-Mendoza AJ. Distribution of Agave (Agavaceae) in Mexico. Cact Suc J. 2002;74:177–88.Google Scholar
- 3.García-Mendoza AJ. Agavaceae. In: Medina R, editor. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. Suppl: 88. México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM; 2011.Google Scholar
- 4.García-Mendoza AJ, Franco-Martínez I, Sandoval-Gutiérrez D. Cuatro especies nuevas de Agave (Asparagaceae, Agavoideae) del sur de México. Acta Botánica Mexicana. 2019;126. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1461.
- 5.Gentry S. Agaves of Continental North America. USA: The University of Arizona Press; 1982.Google Scholar
- 6.Smith EC. Plant Remains. In: Byers D, editor. The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume 1: Environment and Subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 220–55.Google Scholar
- 7.RS MN. A summary of the subsistence. In: Byers D, editor. The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume 1: Environment and Subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 290–310.Google Scholar
- 8.Callen EO. Analysis of the Tehuacan coprolites. In: Byers D, editor. The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume 1: Environment and Subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 261–89.Google Scholar
- 9.Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Torres I, Casas A, Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Rangel-Landa S, Delgado-Lemus A, Carrillo-Galván G. Los agaves y las prácticas mesoamericanas de aprovechamiento, manejo y domesticación. In: Casas A, Torres-Guevara J, Parra F, editors. Domesticación en el Continente Americano. Vol. 2. Investigación para el Manejo Sustentable de Recursos Genéticos en el Nuevo Mundo. México: UNAM-UNALM; 2017. p. 273–308.Google Scholar
- 11.Martín del Campo R. El pulque en el México precortesiano. México: Instituto de Biología, UNAM; 1938.Google Scholar
- 12.Goncalves de Lima O. El maguey y el pulque en los códices mexicanos. México: FCE; 1986.Google Scholar
- 13.Álvarez-Palma A, Canssiano G, Villa-Kamel A. La explotación del maguey pulquero en la zona de Metztitlan: datos etnográficos y arqueológicos. Dimensión Antropológica. 1998;13:7–30.Google Scholar
- 14.Lorenzo-Monterrubio A. Las haciendas pulqueras de México. México: Coordinación de Estudios de Posgrado de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.Fournier P. Los hñänñü del Valle del Mezquital: maguey, pulque y alfarería. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia; 2007.Google Scholar
- 16.Lappe-Oliveras P, Moreno-Terrazas R, Arrizón-Gaviño J, Herrera-Suárez T, García-Mendoza A, Gschaedler-Mathis A. Yeasts associated with the production of Mexican alcoholic nondistilled and distilled Agave beverages. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:1037–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00430.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Escalante A, Giles-Gómez M, Hernández G, Córdova-Aguilar MS, López-Munguía A, Gosset G, Bolívar F. Analysis of bacterial community during the fermentation of pulque, a traditional Mexican alcoholic beverage, using a polyphasic approach. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;124(2):126–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Escalante A, López-Soto DR, Velázquez-Gutiérrez JE, Giles-Gómez M, Bolívar F, López Munguía A. Pulque, a traditional Mexican alcoholic fermented beverage: Historical, microbiological, and technical aspects. Front Microbiol. 2016;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01026.
- 19.Ortiz-Basurto RI, Pourcelly G, Doco T, Williams P, Dornier M, Belleville MP. Analysis of the main components of the aguamiel produced by the maguey-pulquero (Agave mapisaga) throughout the harvest period. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(10):3682–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf072767h.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.de Alcalá J. La Relación de Michoacán. El Colegio de Michoacán: México; 2016.Google Scholar
- 23.Colunga-García Marín P, Eguiarte L, Larqué A, Zizumbo-Villarreal D. En lo ancestral hay futuro: del tequila, los mezcales y otros agaves. CICY-CONACYT-CONABIO-INE: Mexico; 2007.Google Scholar
- 25.Casas A, Blancas J, Pérez E, Torres I, Vallejo M, Rangel-Rangel S, Moreno-Calles AI, Farfán B. Manejo sustenatable de recursos naturales: naturaleza y cultura. In: Arias G, Farfán B, Corral C, Rendón H, Herrera M, Servín H, González M, Hernández S, Corre F, Acatitla C, editors. Sustentabilidad e interculturalidad paradigmas entre la relación cultura y naturaleza. México: Universidad Intercultural Indígena de Michoacán; 2014. p. 10–9.Google Scholar
- 28.Darwin C. The variation of plants and animals under domestication. London: John Murray; 1868.Google Scholar
- 31.Figueredo CJ, Casas A, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P, Nassar JM, González A. Morphological variation, management and domestication of ‘maguey alto’ (Agave inaequidens) and ‘maguey manso’ (A. hookeri) in Michoacán, México. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(66). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-%204269-10-66.
- 32.Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Casas A, Torres-García I. Morphological and genetic divergence between Agave inaequidens, A. cupreata and the domesticated A. hookeri. Analysis of their evolutionary relationships. PLoS One. 2017;12(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187260.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Figueredo-Urbina CJ, Casas A, Martínez-Díaz Y, Santos-Zea L, Gutiérrez-Uribe J. Domestication and saponins contents in a gradient of management intensity of agaves: Agave cupreata, A. inaequidens and A. hookeri in central Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2018;65:1133–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0601-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Vargas-Ponce O, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Martínez-Castillo J, Coello-Coello J, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Diversity and structure of landraces of Agave grown for spirits under traditional agriculture: a comparison with wild populations of A. angustifolia (Agavaceae) and commercial plantations of A. tequilana. Am J Bot. 2009;96:448–57. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Mora-López J, Reyes-Agüero L, Flores-Flores JA, Peña-Valdivia JL, Beatriz C, Aguirre-Rivera JR. Variación morfológica y humanización de la sección Salmianae del género Agave. Agrociencia. 2011;45(4):465–77.Google Scholar
- 39.Casas A. Semillas de agrobiodiversidad. LEISA. 2019;35(2):5–7.Google Scholar
- 40.Leal-Díaz AM, Santos-Zea L, Martínez-Escobedo HC, Guajardo-Flores D, Gutiérrez-Uribe JA, Serna-Saldivar SO. Effect of Agave americana and Agave salmiana Ripeness on Saponin Content from Aguamiel (Agave Sap). J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63(15):3924–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Casas A, Parra F. La domesticación como proceso evolutivo. In: Casas A, Torres-Guevara J, Parra F, editors. Domesticación en el Continente Americano. Vol. 1. Manejo de biodiversidad y evolución dirigida por las culturas del Nuevo Mundo. Perú: UNAM-UNALM; 2016. p. 133–58.Google Scholar
- 44.Trejo L, Limones V, Peña G, Scheinvar E, Vargas-Ponce O, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Genetic variation and relationships among agaves related to the production of Tequila and Mezcal in Jalisco. Indust Crops Prod. 2018;125:140–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Alfaro-Rojas G, Legaria-Solano JP, Rodríguez-Pérez JE. Diversidad genética en poblaciones de agaves pulqueros (Agave spp.) del nororiente del Estado de México. Rev Fitotec Mex. 2007;30(1):1–12.Google Scholar
- 46.Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among Natural Populations. USA: University of Chicago Press; 1978.Google Scholar
- 47.Hartl DL, Clark GC. Principles of Population Genetics. USA: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland; 1997.Google Scholar
- 48.Cortés-Máximo JC. El valle de Tarímbaro. Economía y sociedad en el siglo XIX. México: UMSNH, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas; 1999.Google Scholar
- 49.Secretaría de Urbanismo y Medio Ambiente del Estado de Michoacán. Programa de Ordenamiento Territorial de la Zona Metropolitana de Morelia. POTZMM. México: Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán de Ocampo; 2009.Google Scholar
- 50.Lefort F, Douglas GC. Occurrence and detection of triploids by microsatellite analysis. In: Douglas GC editor. Strategies for improvement of forest tree species. Dublin: Proceedings of the Teagasc/TDC Symposium on Forest Genetics, COFORD; 1999. p. 19–35.Google Scholar
- 52.Pacheco-Torres F. Estandarización de técnicas de análisis genéticos y fisiológicos para el estudio de la evolución de Agaves bajo domesticación. Bachelor thesis. México: Instituto Tecnológico de Morelia; 2019.Google Scholar
- 56.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-%20294X.2005.02553.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Earl DA. Structure harvester v0.6. 2011. http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/struct_harvest/. Accessed 2017 May 10.
- 60.Álvarez-Ríos GD. Del maguey al vaso: el manejo del pulque en las pulquerías del Distrito Federal y en las localidades abastecedoras. Bachelor thesis. México: UNAM; 2015.Google Scholar
- 62.Reyes-Agüero J, Peña-Valdivia C, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Mora-López J. Infraspecific variation of Agave mapisaga Trel. and A. salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck. (Asparagaceae) related to ancestral usages at the Hñähñu region in central Mexico. Agrociencia. 2019;53(4):563–79.Google Scholar
- 63.Vargas-Ponce O, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. In situ diversity and maintanenace of traditional Agave landraces used in spirits production in West-Central Mexico. Economic Botany. 2007;61:362. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[362:ISDAMO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Mariaca-Méndez R. El huerto familiar del sureste de México. México: Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Protección Ambiental del Estado de Tabasco-El Colegio de la Frontera Sur; 2012.Google Scholar
- 65.González-Jácome A. Sistemas agrícolas en orografías complejas: Las terrazas de Tlaxcala. In: Moreno-Calles AI, Casas A, Toledo VM, Vallejo-Ramos M, editors. Etnoagroforestería en México. México: UNAM, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores-Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad; 2016. p. 111–44.Google Scholar
- 67.Palomino G, Martínez J, Méndez I. Variación inter e intraespecífica en especies de Agave por citometría de flujo y análisis de sus cromosomas. In: Colunga-García Marín P, Eguiarte L, Larqué A, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, editors. En lo ancestral hay futuro: del tequila, los mezcales y otros Agaves. Mexico: CICY-CONACYT-CONABIO-INE; 2007. p. 41–65.Google Scholar
- 68.Robert ML, Herrera J, Arce-Montoya M. La biotecnología aplicada al mejoramiento genético de los agaves. In: Colunga-García Marín P, Eguiarte L, Larqué A, Zizumbo-Villarreal D, editors. En lo ancestral hay futuro: del tequila, los mezcales y otros agaves. Mexico: CICY-CONACYT-CONABIO-INE; 2007. p. 369–84.Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.