Modern and traditional approaches combined into an effective graybox mathematical model of fullblood acidbase
Abstract
Background
The acidity of human body fluids, expressed by the pH, is physiologically regulated in a narrow range, which is required for the proper function of cellular metabolism. Acidbase disorders are common especially in intensive care, and the acidbase status is one of the vital clinical signs for the patient management. Because acidbase balance is connected to many bodily processes and regulations, complex mathematical models are needed to get insight into the mixed disorders and to act accordingly. The goal of this study is to develop a fullblood acidbase model, designed to be further integrated into more complex human physiology models.
Results
We have developed computationally simple and robust fullblood model, yet thorough enough to cover most of the common pathologies. Thanks to its simplicity and usage of Modelica language, it is suitable to be embedded within more elaborate systems. We achieved the simplification by a combination of behavioral SiggaardAndersen’s traditional approach for erythrocyte modeling and the mechanistic Stewart’s physicochemical approach for plasma modeling. The resulting model is capable of providing variations in arterial pCO2, base excess, strong ion difference, hematocrit, plasma protein, phosphates and hemodilution/hemoconcentration, but insensitive to DPG and CO concentrations.
Conclusions
This study presents a straightforward unification of SiggaardAndersen’s and Stewart’s acidbase models. The resulting fullblood acidbase model is designed to be a core part of a complex dynamic wholebody acidbase and gas transfer model.
Keywords
Acidbase modeling Physicochemical acidbase Behavioral acidbase SiggaardAndersen Modelica Physiology PhysiolibraryBackground
Acidbase disturbances are associated with a number of fluid, electrolyte, metabolic and respiratory disorders. Understanding the pathogenesis and the underlying pathophysiological processes is crucial for proper diagnostics and treatment, especially in acute medicine, anaesthesiology and during artificial respiration. Complex mathematical models help to uncover the pathogenesis of complex bodily disorders.
Two major approaches for mathematical modeling of the acidbase status of blood are widely employed. The traditional model by SiggaardAndersen [1] (SA) is a behavioral model of full blood acidbase (i.e. including erythrocytes), but it is originally defined for standard albumin and phosphates only (though added later [2]) and, on its own, the model is unable to assess hemodilution and hemoconcentration (e.g. during fluid replacement), and the individual levels of ions are not considered. The second model, Stewart’s physicochemical [3] model, or the socalled modern approach, is a structural model of plasma only, but it is essential for assessing hemodilution, ion and protein imbalances, which are common in critically ill patients. However neither of these is satisfactory as a complete model.
The Stewart’s physicochemical approach has been further extended to overcome some of its disadvantages. Rees and Andreasen shown the extension to full blood and enhanced it by circulation, blood gases, interstitium and cellular compartments [4]. Wooten later presented an extension to the extracellular compartment [5] and most recently, Wolf [6] proposed a profound steadystate physicochemical model of erythrocyteplasmainterstitiumcell compartments, including detailed ion and water balance. It has been built with the purpose to mechanistically describe complex physicochemical processes, which is, however, computationally demanding and hard to solve due to a large system of nonlinear equations. This prevents us from integrating the detailed models into more complex models, or from usage for patientspecific identification.
Described approaches [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] are, however, designed for steadystate situations. To extend the wholebody acidbase assessment by bodily regulatory loops and to show pathogenesis of developing disorders in time, one needs to construct even larger integrative model, including important bodily compartments (interstitial fluid, cells) and regulations (kidney, liver, respiratory regulation) interconnected by a circulation of fullblood, the core component of our approach [7]. From the authors’ experience, these subcomponents however need to be based on computationally robust submodels, which are yet precise enough to describe the physiology.
The aim of this study is to develop a detailed, yet computationally effective, full blood model by combining the two predominant approaches to blood acidbase balance. The resulting combined model will become an essential part of a future complex dynamic wholebody acidbase and blood gas transfer model following the border flux theory [7] to assess dynamic bodily compensations.
Methods
where pH_{HCT1} = pH_{SA} and pH_{HCT0} = pH_{PC}. Note that pH_{HCT1} does not represent the pH inside an erythrocyte, as modeled by Raftos et al., Rees et al. or Wolf and DeLand [11, 12, 13]. In contrast, it is a limit of the pH outside erythrocytes, as the hematocrit of this theoretical compartment (the ratio of erythrocytes) approaches 1. For computation of pH_{HCT1}, we employ our formalization of SiggaardAndersen’s nomogram, using a set of three sixthorder and a fourth order polynomials, whereas pH_{HCT0} (effectively plasma only) is given by Fencl’s simple plasma description [14]. However, the particular models used can be replaced by more complex descriptions, with some tradeoff between level of detail and numerical complexity. Please refer to the online supplement for the details regarding the calculation of pH_{HCT1} by own formalization of SiggaardAndersen’s nomogram (eqs. 1–11 in the Additional file 1) and on calculation of pH_{HCT0} from the physicochemical model (eqs. 12–16 in the Additional file 1).
BE_{HCT0} (Base excess of the zerohematocrit compartment) is formed by the physicochemical model of plasma, so in this case it equals BE_{PC}.
A Modelica tool (tested in Dymola 2016 by Dassault Systémes and OpenModelica 1.11 by OpenModelica Consortium) automatically solves the set of coupled equations, employs necessary numerical methods and finds the steadystate solution.
The model is then validated by a visual comparison with the contemporary models in use.
We executed a steadystate sensitivity analysis of the buffer capacity for albumin and phosphate concentration levels on the combined model in comparison with contemporary models. The initial plasma concentrations were varied from 50 to 200% of the nominal value (4.4 g/dl for albumin and 1.15 g/dl for phosphate). The BE was held constant during the changes; therefore, according to eq. (5), the plasma SID was also varied.
For the lack of established metric to compare the computational complexity and solvability of equationbased models, the former is demonstrated by a sum of nontrivial equations and the latter by the initialization time (through the initial value of CPU time variable, provided by the Modelica tool). We show the values of our Combined model compared to our Modelica implementation of the Wolf model, as a representative of a complete physicochemical approach. The models were compared in Dymola 2016, on a reference computer with Windows 10 64b and i73667 U processor. To correctly count small time spans, each model was run 1000 times in parallel and then the CPU time was divided by the same factor.
The model source code implemented in the Modelica language, including our implementation of the Wolf’s model and source codes for the figures, is accessible at [18].
Results
The main result of the present study is the combination of the SiggaardAndersen and Stewart’s physicochemical models into a single model, so that we can perform calculations for dilution, albumin, phosphate and the buffer capacity of erythrocytes within a joint computationally effective combined model. The secondary result is the definition of NSID, an indicator showing the relation of BE and SID, each a flagship of its own approach. Thanks to NSID, we can quantify shifts in BE due to the dilution and/or changes in albumin levels or differences in SID due to varying pCO_{2} in full blood.
The results of sensitivity analysis at various plasma albumin concentrations at constant BE are outlined in Fig. 2b (compared with the FiggeFencl model and the later albuminsensitive VanSlyke equation). Due to the dilution of plasma volume by erythrocytes, the sensitivity to albumin concentration in full blood is lower than the sensitivity in plasma. The results of sensitivity analysis of phosphate concentration were negligible at this scale and are not shown.
Discussion
Unification of modern and traditional approaches
The preferred bedside approach to acidbase evaluation still remains under debate, for further information on this issue see [23, 24, 25]. A number of authors have strived to compare the traditional approach to the physicochemical, to be used at the bedside (e.g. [26, 27]) or even make use of both at once [28]. However, although different mathematical formalism, these two major approaches give similar information [29] and some studies conclude that, in principle, neither of the two methods offer a notable advantage [29, 30, 31].
Some previous works already attempted to find a relationship, e.g. Schlichtig [15] addressed the question of how base excess (BE) could have been increased, even though the strong ion difference (SID) had remained unchanged among hypoproteinaemia patients, by proposing SIDEx based on the SA approach to the Van Slyke eq. [9]. Wooten later demonstrated mathematically, that “BE and the change in SID are numerically the same for plasma, provided that the concentrations of plasma noncarbonate buffers remain constant” [16], Matousek continued in the mathematical comparison [29, 32]. We extend the comparison, which was made mostly for plasma, to full blood and variable albumin and phosphate levels and present a method of combining both traditional and physicochemical approaches. NSID also indicates the desired value of SID during albumin and phosphate disorders.
The combined model
The resulting Combined model fits the fullblood SiggaardAndersen model (by definition) and also the contemporary physicochemical model by Wolf [13] reduced to the plasmaerythrocyte compartment. Our contribution lies in the extending the classical physicochemical Stewart approach with the buffering effect of erythrocytes and their effects on SID during variable pCO_{2}, while employing also the BE metric for quantization of H^{+}/HCO_{3}^{−} flow balances. The resulting model is computationally effective and the solution does not exhibit numerical problems within normal input ranges.
During the pCO_{2} titration (Fig. 3b), it can be seen that the SID of plasma in whole blood is not independent of pCO_{2} and therefore could not serve as an independent state property. On the contrary, the BE_{OX} (BE correction for virtual fully oxygenated blood, which could be calculated e.g. as in [33]), together with total O_{2} and total CO_{2} blood concentrations, are then a truly independent state properties of the fullblood component (as implemented in accompanied model [18]).
The concept of NSID, redefined for standard interstitium conditions, is then together with the eq. (5) usable also for calculations of BE in interstitial fluid to interconnect the blood with the interstitial compartment.
The proposed model does not depend on any new parameter or set any limitation to the contemporary approaches; rather, it solely joins them using the additional assumption of passive ion exchange only.
Combined model assumptions and limitations
The Combined model relies on fundamental assumptions of each of the combined approaches. The erythrocytes in the HCT1 compartment provide an additional buffer, mostly due to the binding of H^{+} to hemoglobin. This is associated with interchange of Cl^{−} for HCO^{−} _{3}, also during the change in pCO_{2}, which has been described in numerous textbooks. The H^{+} / HCO_{3}^{−} flows are not directly conserved, as it might be buffered by a number of mechanisms, but persists in the form of BE metric. In Stewart’s terms, the H^{+}/HCO_{3}^{−} flows are expressed in the form of SID change, i.e. here as exchange for Cl^{−}.
To maintain the electroneutrality, we assume 1:1 transfer. As a complement of the reduced Cl^{−} in the plasma, the HCO_{3}^{−} in Fig. 3b is rising and so is the total SID. Again, this could be viewed from two standpoints: in SiggaardAndersen’s traditional approach it is the change of BE, e.g. + 1 M of HCO_{3}^{−} equals the change of BE by plus one. In Stewart’s terms, this equals to the change in SID by + 1 (as shown by [5]). In the current case of HCO_{3}^{−} to Cl^{−} exchange, it is decrease of Cl^{−} by exactly 1 M.
Our approach is generally limited by the measured data for behavioral model  the plasma is mechanistically extendable and replaceable by more complex models (see the next section), but the reactions in erythrocytes are measured for standard conditions only  that is normal concentration of DPG (5,0 mmol/l), fetal hemoglobin (0 mmol/l) and CO (0 mmol/l). To take these into account, the behavioral description would need to be radically extended by a number of dimensions, impairing the computational effectivity.
The variouscomplexity implementation
Our implementation in Modelica language enables switching complexity of a particular compartment. That is, we can use three different models for formulation of the physicochemical plasma compartment with various complexity: the simplest model of Fencl [34], the FiggeFencl model [14], updated to version 3.0 [20] to quantify albumin in detail, or Wolf’s plasma compartment from [35] in current version v3.51 to consider also effects of Mg^{2+} and Ca^{2+} binding on albumin). The tradeoff is computational complexity. For description of the SiggaardAndersen erythrocytes compartment, we include the original formulation of the VanSlyke eq. [9], our exact formalization using the set of four sixthorder polynomials and the simplest model of Zander [36]. Optionally, the computation can be enhanced with dilution. This allows to choose a simple to mediumcomplex description, based on current modeling needs. The fullblood component is supposed to be used in multiple arterial and venous parts of a complex model, thus the low complexity and robustness are vital.
Computation complexity
Because the acidbase computations are highly nonlinear, iterative algorithms which converge to the solution are often used (as employed by e. g. SiggaardAndersen’s OSA [37], FiggeFencl calculations [20] or even by the newest Wolf model [13] in the form of a running constraintunknown optimization problem). From the authors observation, the algorithm may diverge and fail to find any solution or there might be more possible solutions to the formulation of the problem, therefore these models are often sensitive to the initial guess of unknown variables and could have problems for states far from the physiological norm (usually being the initial guess). This makes acidbase modeling particularly challenging, as small changes to guesses of state variables may lead to potentially invalid solution.
The numerical solvability of the equationbased models depends especially on the nonlinearity of the problem, particularly on the Jacobian matrix condition number of the equation system. This is, however, very specific to the chosen tool and usage of the certain model and, regrettably, no such formal metric is currently established (F. Casella, personal communication, November 2017). For model comparison, we use a number of nontrivial equations, which might be a good indicator for overall model complexity. To assess the solvability, we propose to use the time needed to consistently initialize the equation set, that is to find exactly one solution. For harder tasks, the solver employs several iterative methods one after another to overcome the convergence problems caused by nonlinearities, which will affect the initialization time. Sometimes, the solution may not be found. From our experience, these two metrics does not necessarily correspond to each other.
Wolf model [35] is the most complete mechanistic description of whole body acidbase. The model is available as a VisSim simulator, which is however unsuitable for integration into other models. Convergence to a solution of its original implementation takes approximately 5  20s on the reference computer. The computation time of our reimplementation in modern equationbased Modelica language is negligible (almost instant  see Fig. 5), however it uncovers numerical instabilities and thus this model, as a whole, is unsuitable to be a part of larger integrative model. Our Modelica implementation of Wolf’s EP (erythrocyte  plasma) has 77 nontrivial (other than direct assignment) equations and is numerically hard to solve  some input settings (e.g. low pCO2 and high BE) lead to invalid solutions and some Modelica tools are even unable to compute the erythrocyteplasma model correctly at all (yet does not have any problems with the proposed Combined model). Although we admire the level of detail of the Wolf’s mechanistic model, for our needs it is unnecessarily complex, even when reduced to EP compartments.
Albumin
The Combined model has been originally designed with focus on precise albumin computation (when the FiggeFencl plasma model is employed) in combination with hemoglobine buffering. Although the albumin concentration is considered important, Figs. 2b and 3 suggest that the plasma protein buffer capacity is significantly lower than the buffer capacity of hemoglobin.
Clinical observations favor the second case, where the SID is reported normal during hypoproteinemic alkalosis [38]. Some later studies [27, 39] challenge the existence of hypoproteinemic alkalosis in their study dataset, but we theorize that the effect (elevated BE) of albumin depletion in these studies has already been compensated. The exact explanation of this phenomenon is yet to be addressed by the fullbody model, which would extend the currently presented model.
Conclusion
When the inner details of any component are not the objective in complex integrative modeling, we can significantly reduce the complexity by substituting it with the behavioral description, yet still retain mechanistic properties of other components and its interactions.
We present a method to quantify the interconnection of two generally used and wellknown approaches to acidbase balance, using no additional parameters or assumptions other than passive ion exchange.
The resulting Combined model of fullblood acidbase balance unites the advantages of each approach: it can simulate variations in albumin level, buffer the effect of erythrocytes and predict a reaction to hemodilution and hemoconcentration, yet remains computationally simple. On the other hand, the proposed approach is insensitive to nonnormal DPG, HbF and CO concentrations.
The combination gives an additional insight to the acidbase balance by establishing the relationship between the SID and the BE (using the defined NSID in the eq. (5)).
The model is designed to have a variable computational complexity and to be effectively extended by other bodily compartments (interstitial fluid, intracellular fluid, metabolism) and regulations (respiratory and renal) to assess the wholebody dynamic acidbase status.
Notes
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank to Karel Roubík and Arnošt Mládek for a careful review, to S.E. Rees for a great insight and invaluable comments and to Francesco Casella for discussion on numerical solvability of the equationbased models.
Funding
This study has been supported by the TRIO MPO FV20628 grant.
Availability of data and materials

Project name: Full blood acidbase

Project home page: https://github.com/filipjezek/fullbloodacidbase/

Archived version: DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1134853

Operating system(s): Platform independent

Programming language: Modelica 3.2.1

Other requirements: For some parts, Physiolibrary is required (available at physiolibrary.org or bundled with OpenModelica)

License: GNU GPLv3

Any restrictions to use by nonacademics: additional licence needed
Authors’ contributions
JK initiated the study, FJ implemented the models and performed the comparative analysis. FJ and JK wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary material
References
 1.SiggaardAndersen O, Others. The acidbase status of the blood. Munksgaard.; 1974.Google Scholar
 2.SiggaardAndersen O, FoghAndersen N. Base excess or buffer base (strong ion difference) as measure of a nonrespiratory acidbase disturbance. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1995;107:123–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 3.Stewart PA. How to understand acidbase: A quantitative acid base primer for biology and medicine: Elsevier; 1981.Google Scholar
 4.Andreassen S, Rees SE. Mathematical models of oxygen and carbon dioxide storage and transport: interstitial fluid and tissue stores and wholebody transport. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;33:265–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 5.Wooten EW. The standard strong ion difference, standard total titratable base, and their relationship to the Boston compensation rules and the Van Slyke equation for extracellular fluid. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24:177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 6.Wolf MB. Whole body acidbase and fluidelectrolyte balance: a mathematical model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;305:F1118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 7.Kofranek J, Matousek S, Andrlik M. Border flux balance approach towards modelling acidbase chemistry and blood gases transport. In: In: Proceedings of the 6th EUROSIM congress on modelling and simulation. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana; 2007. p. 1–9.Google Scholar
 8.Andersen OS. The pHlog pCO2 blood acidbase nomogram revised. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1962;14:598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 9.SiggaardAndersen O. The van Slyke equation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1977;146:15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 10.Figge J, Rossing TH, Fencl V. The role of serum proteins in acidbase equilibria. J Lab Clin Med. 1991;117:453–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 11.Raftos JE, Bulliman BT, Kuchel PW. Evaluation of an electrochemical model of erythrocyte pH buffering using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance data. J Gen Physiol. 1990;95:1183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 12.Rees SE, Klæstrup E, Handy J, Andreassen S, Kristensen SR. Mathematical modelling of the acid–base chemistry and oxygenation of blood: a mass balance, mass action approach including plasma and red blood cells. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:483–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 13.Wolf MB, Deland EC. A comprehensive, computermodelbased approach for diagnosis and treatment of complex acidbase disorders in criticallyill patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 14.Fencl V, Jabor A, Kazda A, Figge J. Diagnosis of Metabolic Acid–Base Disturbances in Critically Ill Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:2246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 15.Schlichtig R. [Base Excess] vs [Strong ION Difference]. In: Nemoto EM, JC LM, Cooper C, Delpy D, Groebe K, Hunt TK, et al., editors. Oxygen Transport to Tissue XVIII. US: Springer; 1997. p. 91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 16.Wooten EW. Calculation of physiological acidbase parameters in multicompartment systems with application to human blood. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:2333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 17.Singer RB, Hastings AB. An improved clinical method for the estimation of disturbances of the acidbase balance of human blood. Medicine. 1948;27:223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 18.Ježek F. fullbloodacidbase. Github. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1134853.
 19.SiggaardAndersen O. Textbook on the AcidBase and Oxygen Status of the Blood. AcidBase and Oxygen Status of the Blood. 2010; http://www.siggaardandersen.dk/OsaTextbook.htm. Accessed 7 Jul 2016
 20.Figge J. The FiggeFencl Quantitative Physicochemical Model of Human AcidBase Physiology (Version 3.0). FiggeFencl.org  FiggeFencl Quantitative Physicochemical Model of Human AcidBase Physiology. 27 October, 2013. http://www.figgefencl.org/model.html. Accessed 22 Jun 2016.
 21.Morgan TJ. The Stewart approachone clinician’s perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2009;30:41–54.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
 22.Lang W, Zander R. Prediction of dilutional acidosis based on the revised classical dilution concept for bicarbonate. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 23.Kurtz I, Kraut J, Ornekian V, Nguyen MK. Acidbase analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonatecentered approaches. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294:F1009–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 24.Severinghaus JW. SiggaardAndersen and the “Great TransAtlantic AcidBase Debate.”. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1993;53:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 25.Berend K. Acidbase pathophysiology after 130 years: confusing, irrational and controversial. J Nephrol. 2013;26:254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 26.Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acidbase physiology. Crit Care. 2005;9:500–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 27.Dubin A, Menises MM, Masevicius FD, Moseinco MC, Kutscherauer DO, Ventrice E, et al. Comparison of three different methods of evaluation of metabolic acidbase disorders*. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 28.Kishen R, Honoré PM, Jacobs R, JoannesBoyau O, De Waele E, De Regt J, et al. Facing acidbase disorders in the third millennium  the Stewart approach revisited. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:209–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
 29.Matousek S, Handy J, Rees SE. Acidbase chemistry of plasma: consolidation of the traditional and modern approaches from a mathematical and clinical perspective. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 30.Masevicius FD, Dubin A. Has Stewart approach improved our ability to diagnose acidbase disorders in critically ill patients? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;4:62–70.Google Scholar
 31.Rastegar A. Clinical utility of Stewart’s method in diagnosis and management of acidbase disorders. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 32.Matoušek S. Reunified description of acidbase physiology and chemistry of blood plasma: PhD. Charles University in Prague; 2013. https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/download/140030054/?lang=cs
 33.Lutz J, Schulze HG, Michael UF. Calculation of O2 saturation and of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve for different species, using a new programmable pocket calculator. Pflugers Arch. 1975;359:285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 34.Fencl V, Jabor A, Kazda A, Figge J. Appendix of Diagnosis of Metabolic Acid–Base Disturbances in Critically Ill Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:2246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 35.Wolf MB. Comprehensive diagnosis of wholebody acidbase and fluidelectrolyte disorders using a mathematical model and wholebody base excess. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:475–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 36.Zander R. Die korrekte Bestimmung des Base Excess (BE, mmol/l) im Blut. AINS  Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin. Schmerztherapie. 1995;30(S 1):S36–8.Google Scholar
 37.SiggaardAndersen M, SiggaardAndersen O. Oxygen status algorithm, version 3, with some applications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1995;107:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 38.McAuliffe JJ, Lind LJ, Leith DE, Fencl V. Hypoproteinemic alkalosis. Am J Med. 1986;81:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 39.Tuhay G, Pein MC, Masevicius FD, Kutscherauer DO, Dubin A. Severe hyperlactatemia with normal base excess: a quantitative analysis using conventional and Stewart approaches. Crit Care. 2008;12:R66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.