Malaria Journal

, 17:145 | Cite as

New endoperoxides highly active in vivo and in vitro against artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum

  • Lis Lobo
  • Lília I. L. Cabral
  • Maria Inês Sena
  • Bruno Guerreiro
  • António Sebastião Rodrigues
  • Valter Ferreira de Andrade-Neto
  • Maria L. S. Cristiano
  • Fatima Nogueira
Open Access
Research

Abstract

Background

The emergence and spread of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapy in Southeast Asia prompted the need to develop new endoperoxide-type drugs.

Methods

A chemically diverse library of endoperoxides was designed and synthesized. The compounds were screened for in vitro and in vivo anti-malarial activity using, respectively, the SYBR Green I assay and a mouse model. Ring survival and mature stage survival assays were performed against artemisinin-resistant and artemisinin-sensitive P. falciparum strains. Cytotoxicity was evaluated against mammalian cell lines V79 and HepG2, using the MTT assay.

Results

The synthesis and anti-malarial activity of 21 new endoperoxide-derived compounds is reported, where the peroxide pharmacophore is part of a trioxolane (ozonide) or a tetraoxane moiety, flanked by adamantane and a substituted cyclohexyl ring. Eight compounds exhibited sub-micromolar anti-malarial activity (IC50 0.3–71.1 nM), no cross-resistance with artemisinin or quinolone derivatives and negligible cytotoxicity towards mammalian cells. From these, six produced ring stage survival < 1% against the resistant strain IPC5202 and three of them totally suppressed Plasmodium berghei parasitaemia in mice after oral administration.

Conclusion

The investigated, trioxolane–tetrazole conjugates LC131 and LC136 emerged as potential anti-malarial candidates; they show negligible toxicity towards mammalian cells, ability to kill intra-erythrocytic asexual stages of artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum and capacity to totally suppress P. berghei parasitaemia in mice.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum Antimalarial drug resistance Trioxolane–tetrazole conjugates Tetraoxane–tetrazole conjugates In vivo antimalarial activity 

Background

Between 2000 and 2015, malaria incidence rates fell by 37% and malaria mortality by 60%. These achievements can be largely attributed to the implementation of the artemisinin (ART)-based combination therapy (ACT) as first-line treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in endemic countries [1]. Artemisinin and its semisynthetic derivatives (ARTs), e.g. artesunate (ATN) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA), display a much better pharmacologic profile than other anti-malarials in use and nowadays world-wide P. falciparum malaria treatment relies on ACT, although resistance to ARTs is now evident in several Southeast Asian countries [2, 3, 4, 5]. Currently, reports of clinical failure of ARTs in areas coincident with partner drug resistance are increasing [6, 7]. Resistance to ARTs has been associated with mutations in the Kelch protein, K13 (PF3D7_1343700) and manifested as delayed parasite clearance [8].

Another relevant issue related to the widespread application of artemisinins (ARTs) is the difficulty in maintaining the drug supply; artemisinin is extracted from Artemisia annua in low yield and ART-derivatives are obtained by a long and expensive semi-synthesis process [9]. These circumstances pushed efforts towards the development of a next generation of potent anti-malarial endoperoxides, equally effective against ART-susceptible and -resistant strains of P. falciparum, as well as safer and cheaper than ARTs. Synthetic trioxolanes [10] and tetraoxanes [11] are particularly promising in this context, exhibiting anti-malarial activity similar to ARTs. Amenable synthetic routes have been developed to both compound classes, enabling the preparation of chemically diverse libraries of analogues for further structure–activity relationship analysis, selection of leads, optimization and development into anti-malarial drugs or drug-candidates. This approach has yielded ozonides OZ277 (arterolane) [12] and OZ439 (artefenomel) [13], but recent studies reported that OZ277 and OZ439 are compromised by the presence of K13 mutations due to potential cross-resistance with DHA [13, 14, 15].

In a recent study, three synthetic trioxolanes were tested in vivo against a mouse model infected with artemisinin resistant parasites and the compounds showed high efficacy in clearing the infection [16]. These results inspired the expansion of the library of compounds and further investigation of their efficacy against artemisinin-resistant (ART-R) P. falciparum strains.

The synthesis and anti-malarial activity of an endoperoxide-type library of compounds (trioxolanes and tetraoxanes) is reported. These can be easily synthesized from relatively cheap starting materials (preparation of the 21 compounds requires from 3 to 6 synthetic steps, depending on the cyclohexyl substitution).

Methods

Synthesis

The procedures for the preparation of the trioxolane- and tetraoxane-derived compounds were developed by us or adapted from the literature [17]. Details for the synthesis and chemical characterization of the 21 peroxide-type compounds and their precursors are included as Additional file 1.

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity against mammalian cells

Cytotoxicity was assessed on the mammalian cell lines HepG2-A16 (human hepatoma) and V79 (Chinese hamster lung), using a MTT based assay, as previously described [18]. Tests were conducted in triplicate for each compound, at a range of concentrations (1 mM–1.372 μM), and with culture media containing 0.5% DMSO (no drug). V79 and HepG2 cell lines were incubated for 24 and 48 h, respectively (media changed at 24 h intervals). Absorbance was read at 570 nm on a multi-mode microplate reader (Triad, Dynex Technologies), to produce a log dose-dependence curve. The LD50 value for each compound was estimated by non-linear interpolation of the dose-dependence curve (GraphPad Software).

Parasite cultivation

Laboratory-adapted P. falciparum 3D7 (chloroquine and mefloquine sensitive), Dd2 (chloroquine-resistant, mefloquine-resistant), IPC5202 (MRA-1240, MR4, ATCC® Manassas Virginia) and IPC4912 (MRA-1241, MR4, ATCC® Manassas Virginia) (artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum) were continuously cultured and sorbitol synchronized, as previously described [19].

IC50 determination

Staging and parasitaemia were determined by light microscopy of Giemsa-stained thin blood smears. Anti-malarial activity was determined using the SYBR Green I assay, as previously described [20]. Briefly, early ring stage parasites (> 80% of rings) were challenged with a 1:3 serial dilution of each compound, in concentrations ranging from 10,000–0.169 nM. Fluorescence intensity was measured with a multi-mode microplate reader (Triad, Dynex Technologies), with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 535 nm, respectively, and analysed by nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism to determine IC50 values.

Ring (RSA) and mature-stage (MSA) survival assay

Ring-stage survival assays (RSA) were carried out as described in [21], with modifications. Parasite cultures were synchronized once, with 5% sorbitol, and in the next reinvasion cycle, twice, with a 6 h interval. Parasites at the ring-stage (< 10 h) or mature-stage (> 36 h) post-invasion (1% parasitaemia and 2% haematocrit) were exposed during 6 h to 700 nM dihydroartemisinin (DHA) or to ≅ 10 × IC50 of each of the tested compounds. Then, plates were centrifuged and supernatant replaced by drug-free culture media. After additional incubation during 66 h for ring-stage, and 42 h for mature-stage, susceptibility was assessed microscopically on Giemsa-stained thin blood smears by estimating the percentage of viable parasites that developed into a second generation of rings or trophozoites.

In vivo anti-malarial assays

In vivo tests were performed following the Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in The Care and Use of Animals of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte—Brazil (CEUA/UFRN/46/2013). Evaluation of anti-malarial activity in vivo was carried out using the Peters’ 4-day suppressive test [22], with modifications, as previously described [23, 24, 25]. Swiss albino mice were infected with Plasmodium berghei NK65 and randomly allocated to groups of five animals. Animals were treated with 50 mg/kg/day of each of the tested compounds (dissolved in PBS containing 1% DMSO), administrated orally, for four consecutive days. The control group was treated with a solution of PBS/1% DMSO. On days 5 (D5), 7 (D7) and 10 (D10) after parasite inoculation, tail blood smears were Giemsa-stained and examined microscopically to estimate parasitaemia. Acute toxicity testing was carried out to determine adverse effects due to compounds (including weight loss, hair appearance, skin wounds and behavioural changes), and recorded daily [26].

Results

Synthesis

A representative library of 21 compounds with potential antiplasmodial activity was designed and synthesized. All compounds proposed include a peroxide-type pharmacophore (trioxolane- or tetraoxane-based) flanked by adamantane and a suitably functionalized cyclohexyl ring. The endoperoxides LC50, LC67 and LC140 were used as intermediates for the preparation of other compounds, altering the cyclohexyl substitution. The synthesis of the trioxolane–tetrazole, tetraoxane-tetrazole and trioxolane–saccharyl conjugates was achieved using a convergent approach whereby the endoperoxide and tetrazole or saccharyl building blocks were separately prepared and then linked to form the desired endoperoxide-based targets. In our library, the chemical diversity is introduced in the cyclohexyl moiety (Fig. 1). Synthetic trioxolanes (compounds LC28, LC50, LC67, LC68, LC92, LC93, LC94, LC95, LC129, LC130, LC131, LC132, LC136, LC142, MIS13, MIS14, MIS15, MIS16; Fig. 1: Scheme 1) and tetraoxanes (compounds LC140, LC163; Fig. 1: Scheme 2) were prepared using the synthetic approaches depicted in Schemes 1 and 2.
Fig. 1

Structural representations of the trioxolanes, tetraoxanes and derivatives of artemisinin investigated in this work. Scheme 1: Representation of the synthetic routes to the trioxolanes prepared; reagents and conditions: (i) Pyridine, MeONH2, MeOH, r.t; (ii) 1,4-Cyclohexane, O3, DCM/pentane, − 78 °C; (iii) LC133, O3, DCM/pentane, − 78 °C; (iv) Ethyl 4-oxocyclohexanecarboxylate, O3, DCM/pentane, − 78 ºC; (v) LC64, AcOH, DCE, NaBH(OAc)3, r.t.; (vi) Trichloroacetic acid, DCM, H2O, r.t.; (vii) 5-Aminotetrazole, DCE, AcOH, NaBH(OAc)3, r.t.; (viii) LiBH4, Et2O, LiBH(Et)3, r.t.; (vi) KOH (3M), MeOH, 60 °C; (x) Phthalimide, Ph3P, DIAD, THF, 0ºC; (xi) Hydrazine hydrate, chloroform/MeOH, 60 °C; (xii) 3-Chloro-1,2-benzisothiazole-1,1-dioxide, THF, 60 °C; (xiii) 3-Chloro-1,2-benzisothiazole-1,1-dioxide, TEA, toluene, 45 °C; (xiv) 2-Methyl-2H-tetrazole-5-amine, TEA, mesyl chloride, THF, 60 ºC; (xv) 5-Chloro-1-phenyl-tetrazole, TEA, mesyl chloride, THF, 60 °C; (xvi) tert-Butyl(4-aminobutyl)carbamate, EDC, HOBt, N-methylmorpholine, DCM, r.t.; (xvii) Trichloroacetic acid, DCM, H2O, r.t.; (xviii) Butylamine, EDC, HOBt, N-Methylmorpholine, DCM, r.t.; (ix) 1-Aminobutane, EDC, HOBt, N-Methylmorpholine, DCM, r.t.; Scheme 2: Representation of the synthetic route to tetraoxanes LC140 and LC163; reagents and conditions: (i) HCO2H, CH3CN, H2O2 50%, 0 °C; (ii) 1,4-Cyclohexanone, DCM, HBF4, 0 °C; (iii) 5-Aminotetrazole, DCE, AcOH, NaBH(OAc)3, r.t.

Cytotoxicity against mammalian cells

In order to evaluate the selectivity of compounds for parasite over mammalian cells, their cytotoxicity was assessed in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) and hamster lung (V79) cells. All tested compounds presented low or undetectable cytotoxicity in both cell lines. The selectivity index (SI) for each compound is expressed by the ratio between its cytotoxicity and antiplasmodial activity (SI = LD50 in mammalian cells/IC50 P. falciparum). At a maximum dose of 1 mM, only MIS13 and MIS14 revealed some in vitro cytotoxicity, inducing a decrease in HepG2 survival of ≅ 30%. The remaining compounds displayed high selectivity indexes (SI > 273) (Additional file 1).

In vitro activity of new endoperoxides

Initially, all 21 synthesized endoperoxides were screened for their in vitro anti-malarial activity against chloroquine-susceptible (3D7) and multidrug-resistant (Dd2) P. falciparum strains (Table 1; Additional file 1), using a whole-cell SYBR Green I based assay. The IC50 values were calculated from at least 3 experiments, carried out in triplicates. The obtained IC50 for the control drug CQ against 3D7 and Dd2, fell within the expected range (Table 1). Among the 21 compounds, 12 showed sub-micromolar activity (IC50 < 1 μM) against both 3D7 and Dd2 strains, with 9 exhibiting IC50 values < 100 nM (LC92, LC129, LC130, LC131, LC132, LC136, LC163, MIS13 and MIS14) (Additional file 1). These 9 compounds were further tested against two ART-R strains (IPC5202 and IPC4912) and, except for MIS14, presented very promising anti-malarial activity, with IC50 values ranging from 0.3 to 71.1 nM (Table 1). In addition to sub-micromolar activity, these eight compounds also demonstrated high selectivity towards the parasite (Additional file 1) and a low resistance index (RI; ranging from 0.10 to 2.43), indicating absence of cross resistance with ARTs (Table 1). Thus, compounds LC92, LC129, LC130, LC131, LC132, LC136, LC163 and MIS13 were selected for further studies.
Table 1

Antiplasmodial activity in vitro (IC50) against resistant and sensitive P. falciparum strains

SD standard deviation, ART artemisinin, ATN artesunate, DHA dihydroartemisinin, CQ chloroquine, n.d. not determined

RIa: resistance index = IC50 (Dd2)/IC50 (3D7)

RIb: resistance index = IC50 (IPC5202)/IC50 (3D7)

RIc: resistance index = IC50 (IPC4912)/IC50 (3D7)

Ring and mature-stage survival rate

Resistance to ARTs in vivo is characterized by a delayed parasite-clearance time. Up to now this phenotype could not be evidenced using the standard in vitro 48–72 h inhibitory assay, expressed as IC50 [13, 21, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31], probably due to the elevated resistance of the very young-ring stages of the parasites. Hence, the phenotypic assay, ring-stage survival assay (RSA), was used to assess the activity of the 8 compounds selected (LC92, LC129, LC130, LC131, LC132, LC136, LC163 and MIS13). Young ring-stage survival of P. falciparum parasites carrying the K13 R539T polymorphism (IPC5202) associated with high RSA and 3D7 were challenged during 6 h with 700 nM DHA or a concentration of 10xIC50 of each of the tested compounds. Generally, the 8 endoperoxides demonstrated higher activity than DHA against the resistant strain (Fig. 2a). It is generally accepted that a survival rate RSA < 1% corresponds to a susceptible behaviour. The 8 endoperoxides were able to reduced RSA < 1% (Fig. 2a) in both ART-R and ART-S strains (IPC5202 and 3D7). On the other hand, DHA exposure resulted in a higher survival rate of the ART-R (up to 25%) than the susceptible 3D7. Concerning the new trioxolanes, no cross-resistance with DHA was apparent for parasites carrying the K13 R539T mutation (Table 1). However, for the tetraoxane LC163 both ART-S and ART-R strains exhibited ring-stage survival above 1% (6.9 ± 1.6 and 2.0 ± 1.9, respectively), although no cross-resistance was observed (Table 1). Mature-stages of both the ART-S and ART-R parasites exhibited full susceptibility to all of the 8 selected endoperoxides, which appear to offer a better performance than DHA (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

Ring-stage (RSA) and mature-stage (MSA) survival rate, expressed as the percentage of viable parasites. Rings (a) and trophozoites (b) were treated with a pulse of 700 nM of DHA or (10 × IC50) synthetic endoperoxides in strains 3D7 and IPC5202

In vivo anti-malarial activity

The 8 best performing compounds were administered orally at 50 mg/kg/day and demonstrated a high inhibition capacity, with parasitaemia ranging from 0 to 0.19 ± 0.12% on day 5 post-infection (Table 2). The efficacy difference was very significant (P < 0.0002), compared to the vehicle-treated mice; the control inhibited parasitaemia by 1.51% ± 0.22 (Table 2). On day 10 post-infection, mice in the control group developed significant parasitaemia (5.65–6.6%), whereas 5 of the compounds led to an appreciable reduction in parasitaemia (0.31 ± 0.10–1.32 ± 1.24%) and the remaining 3 compounds completely suppressed parasitaemia (Table 2). Although at a low level, in the group treated with LC92 5 animals developed parasitaemia from day 5 onwards. In the group treated with MIS13 only 1/5 mice presented parasitaemia on day 5, and by day 10 the five mice were cured. Even though MIS13 was the most cytotoxic in vitro against HepG2 cells, from the range of 21 compounds tested, no adverse effects were observed in vivo. During the experimental procedure, the animals were monitored daily and no adverse effects were observed for any of the tested compounds. Appreciable in vivo anti-malarial activity was observed for the two sacharyl substituted compounds (LC129, LC130). LC129 kept parasitaemia at a low level, but failed to completely suppress it. On the other hand, LC130 was able to suppress parasitaemia until day 5 but recrudescence occurred on day 7 (2/5 mice were parasitemic) and by day 10 all animals presented parasitaemia (Table 2), although significantly lower than in the control group (P = 0.017). In the group treated with LC132 and LC163 recrudescence also occurred on day 10. However, a strong in vivo anti-malarial effect against P. berghei was observed with LC131 and LC136, with complete suppression of parasitaemia throughout the experiment (10 days), suggesting that sufficient plasma concentration was attained, hence indicating a promising bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile.
Table 2

In vivo anti-malarial activity against Plasmodium berghei

Compound

Dose (mg/kg/day)

Mean parasitaemia ± SD (% inhibition of parasite growth)b

Day 5

Day 7

Day 10

Controla

 

1.51 ± 0.22

3.58 ± 0.81

5.65 ± 0.43

LC92

50

0.02 ± 0.05 (98.34)

0.46 ± 0.60 (86.99)

0.77 ± 0.26 (86.27)

LC129

50

0.19 ± 0.12 (87.60)

1.76 ± 1.36 (50.69)

1.32 ± 1.24 (76.67)

LC130

50

0 (100)

1.4 ± 0.94 (60.83)

1.32 ± 0.24 (76.67)

LC131

50

0 (100)

0 (100)

0 (100)

LC132

50

0 (100)

0 (100)

0.31 ± 0.10 (94.46)

LC136

50

0 (100)

0 (100)

0 (100)

MIS13

50

0.11 ± 0.19 (92.56)

0.05 ± 0.10 (98.60)

0 (100)

LC163

50

0 (100)

0 (100)

0.2 ± 0.13 (96.46)

SD standard deviation

aControl: treated with PBS 1% DMSO

bParasitaemia reduction compared to untreated control group

Discussion

The new peroxide-type compounds tested have shown low or undetectable cytotoxicity against human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) and hamster lung (V79) cell lines. It is generally accepted that, if SI > 10, the observed pharmacological activity is not due to cytotoxicity [32, 33]. Since the SI values calculated for the compounds are considerably higher, that the activity exhibited by the compounds is unlikely due to general cellular toxicity, but rather due to specific antiplasmodial activity. The eight endoperoxides selected from our library that met the criteria—SI > 100 and IC50 < 100 nM [34] were evaluated for in vitro and in vivo efficacy, demonstrating IC50 values in the range of those exhibited by ARTs and a strong curative effect in vivo, with a parasitaemia reduction on day 10 above 76% (Tables 1, 2). These 8 compounds were particularly active against intra erythrocytic stages, across all four P. falciparum strains tested, with IC50 values ranging from 0.3 to 71.1 nM and high selectivity for the parasite. Even though LC136 presented RIs > 1 (up to 2.43), the values fall within the range of those exhibited by ARTs for the same parasite strains (0.62–8.32; Table 1).

Results show that the nature of the cyclohexyl substituent affects antiplasmodial activity. For instance, LC92 exhibited IC50 values up to 11 times higher than the control drugs (ART derivatives) while its counterpart MIS13 was shown to be as effective as ARTs across the four parasite strains, with no apparent cross resistance. This increased activity probably arises from an improvement in pharmacokinetic properties due to: (i) a more substituted amino functionality that increases the overall hydrophilicity and favours protonation in acidic environments; and (ii) to the BOC-protection of the side chain that facilitates the transport of MIS13 through the cell membrane (compared to LC92) [35]. Although MIS13 induced a slight cytotoxicity in vitro (30% reduction in survival of HepG2 cells at 1 mM), no adverse effects were observed in vivo. Only 1/5 animals treated with MIS13 presented parasitaemia on day 5, which gradually decreased until 0% by day 10, whereas in the group treated with LC92 all animals presented residual parasitaemia during the 10 days.

Compounds LC131, LC132 and LC136, comprising a tetrazole moiety linked to the trioxolane pharmacophore, exhibited an excellent anti-malarial profile, both in vitro and in vivo. Tetrazole-containing drugs and drug-candidates are thriving in medicinal chemistry [36, 37] and many are effective therapeutic agents for various pathogenesis, showing a wide range of pharmacological activities, such as antimicrobial, antibacterial, antifungal, and antitubercular [38, 39, 40, 41]. The tetrazole moiety has been described as metabolically stable, featuring in the structure of several drugs and drug-candidates, usually as a surrogate for the carboxylic acid functionality, and generally improving the pharmacokinetic profile [42, 43]. The higher metabolic stability conferred by the tetrazole [42, 43, 44, 45, 46] could be improving the pharmacological properties or increasing accumulation (due to the electron-withdrawing properties). In line with this, a better in vivo anti-malarial profile for the tetrazole conjugates LC131, LC132, LC136 and LC163, was observed, particularly for trioxolanes LC131 and LC136, which exhibited a curative effect in mice with total suppression of parasitaemia from day 5 to day 10. To assess the nature of the tetrazole moiety contribution to the anti-malarial activity, the tetrazole building blocks (LC133 and LC126II; Additional file 1) were separately tested and revealed to be devoid of antiplasmodial activity. The ether-linked tetrazolyl–trioxolane conjugate LC132 was up to 12 times less active than LC131 or LC136 and, in vivo, allowed recrudescence on day 10. Probably, this compound is less stable due to the possibility of thermally-induced 1,3-isomerization of the alkyl-trioxolane moiety [47], as the C(alkyl)-O bond is relatively weak due to the electron withdrawing effect of the tetrazole heterocycle. Comparatively, the amino-linked conjugates LC131 and LC136 are chemically more stable. LC131 and LC136 exhibited an exceptionally good in vitro anti-malarial profile against both ART-R and ART-S parasites, comparable to that of the control drugs ART, ATN and DHA. The ability of the amino group to protonate in the acidic environment of the food vacuole probably confers additional anti-malarial efficacy by facilitating accumulation, placing the two new compounds as promising drug candidates. In conjugates LC131 and LC136 the heteroaromatic substituent is a 2-substituted 5-aminotetrazole (in LC136 the tetrazole ring exhibits tautomerism, with the 2-H tautomer being favoured in the gas phase) [48]. An additional interest of this substitution pattern resides in the potential of 2,5-disubstituted tetrazoles to act as probes. It was demonstrated that, upon narrow-band UV-induced irradiation, 2,5-dissubstituted tetrazoles generate nitrile imine dipolar species in situ, via extrusion of N2, which may then react with an alkene dipolarophile through a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction [49, 50]. Thus, the trioxolane–tetrazole conjugates LC131 and LC136 could also be developed as tags for mechanistic studies.

Compound LC163 is a tetraoxane–tetrazole conjugate structurally related to the trioxolane LC136. The results show that replacement of the trioxolane by a tetraoxane ring, as the pharmacophore, leads to a decreased anti-malarial activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Even though the RIs for LC163 are low, the corresponding IC50 values for the resistant strains IPC4912 and IPC5202 are, respectively, 3 and 42 times higher than those found for trioxolane LC136. The reason for this difference is still elusive [51], so detailed structural studies on both compounds are planned.

The saccharyl substituent present in compounds LC129 and LC130 is also electron withdrawing and metabolically stable. Additionally, the saccharyl system is thermally and photochemically more stable than the tetrazole system and is generally found to improve the overall stability of the molecule [27], although it is worth noting that LC129 is prone to Chapman-type isomerization [27]. The anti-malarial profile exhibited by the trioxolane–saccharyl conjugates LC129 and LC130 was slightly inferior to that of their tetrazole analogues (Tables 1, 2). As for trioxolane–tetrazoles, the saccharyl building block was tested separately and revealed to be devoid of antiplasmodial activity (Additional file 1). Hence, the anti-malarial activity demonstrated by the trioxolane–saccharyl conjugates can be ascribed to the presence of the trioxolane pharmacophore.

Structural analogies between DHA, trioxolanes and tetraoxanes may accommodate similar modes of action, hence some level of cross resistance [10, 28, 29, 30, 31, 52]. In the light of this, it was investigated whether parasites expressing variant forms R539T (IPC502) and I543T (IPC4912) of K13 are cross-resistant to the newly synthesized trioxolanes and tetraoxanes.

ARTs resistance cannot be evidenced by the standard in vitro IC50 assay [13, 21, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Critical for the development of anti-malarials is the evaluation of their activity against ART-R parasites, which has been defined as delayed parasite clearance in patients [53]. Slow parasite clearance of P. falciparum malaria in patients results from reduced ring-stage susceptibility [53, 54, 55, 56], this increasing the need for new compounds with a low RSA. The mutation R539T (present in IPC5202) is one of the k13 mutations that confer high levels of DHA resistance in vitro [31, 52, 57]. We explored the susceptibility of the IPC5202 ring and mature-stage parasites (RSA and MSA) to the best performing compounds. As depicted in Fig. 2, the endoperoxides selected demonstrated higher activity than DHA, both against ring and mature stages. As expected, DHA exposure resulted in a higher survival rate of IPC5202 (up to 25%) than for 3D7 [58, 59], though lower than in other reports [60]. A survival rate RSA < 1% is generally considered as susceptible behaviour. The tested trioxolanes were able to reduce ring survival to less than 1% in both resistant and susceptible strains (IPC5202 and 3D7), hence no cross-resistance with DHA is apparent, even in parasites carrying the K13 mutation R539T. This notable observation indicates that our compounds have an improved range of activity, compared to other trioxolanes in use, namely the registered drug OZ277, which is compromised by K13 mutations [31]. Regarding the tetraoxane LC163, both the K13 wild type (3D7) and mutant (IPC5202) parasites presented RSA > 1% (though not significantly different). These observations are in agreement with data recently published showing that a tetraoxane also allowed growth above 1% in RSA assay in a strain carrying K13 R538T mutation [61]. The results indicate therefore that the anti-malarial activity of the newly synthesized endoperoxides is not compromised by the K13 mutation R539T, a mutation that confers high levels of in vitro resistance and has been associated with delayed parasite clearance in patients [8, 62, 63, 64, 65]. The mature-stage assay (MSA) evidenced nearly full susceptibility of the two strains to all of the eight compounds (Fig. 2). Thus, all compounds performed better than DHA. Typically, DHA allows a ≅ 1% of viable mature-stage [13, 21]. ARTs resistance phenotypes are associated with a decreased susceptibility of the ring stage to enter dormancy, a decreased sensitivity of mature-stage parasites and a faster recovery from dormancy [66, 67]. Currently these parameters are being addressed in order to gather more information regarding the mode of action of the more promising compounds.

As expected, no cross-resistance of the proposed compounds with quinolone-type anti-malarials is foreseeable, as the calculated RIs for Dd2 and 3D7 were ≅1 (Table 1), which is considerably lower than the RI determined for CQ (21.5) [20, 68].

Conclusion

The compounds LC131, LC136 and MIS13 demonstrated to be the most promising; they showed nanomolar activity against ART-resistant P. falciparum parasites, negligible toxicity towards mammalian cells, totally suppressed P. berghei parasitaemia in mice and showed no cross resistance with CQ and ARTs.

These compounds can be easily prepared from relatively cheap starting materials. For instance, LC136 requires only 3 synthetic steps. On the other hand, ART-derivatives are obtained from the expensive natural product artemisinin through semi-synthesis. Thus, besides the excellent pharmacologic properties, an anti-malarial peroxide-type formulation based on trioxolane LC136 could be cheaper than those based on current ART-derivatives, while offering a comparable, or even better, anti-malarial profile.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

LL carried out the in vitro and in vivo anti-malarial evaluation of the tested compounds, participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. LC carried out the synthesis of most of the tested compounds, participated in the design of the study and of the synthetic routes and drafted the manuscript. MIS and BG carried out the synthesis of intermediate compounds and of the target MIS13 and reviewed critically the manuscript. SR participated in the design of the study, and reviewed critically the manuscript. VAN participated in the design of the study, coordinated the in vivo anti-malarial evaluation of the tested compounds, and reviewed critically the manuscript. MLC participated in the conception, design and coordination of the study. Proposed the range of compounds investigated and synthetic routes, coordinated the synthesis, the analysis and interpretation of the results and the manuscript preparation. FN participated in the conception, design and coordination of the study. Coordinated the in vitro anti-malarial evaluation of the tested compounds, the analysis and interpretation of the results and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, and FEDER, through projects GHTM—UID/Multi/04413/2013, CCMAR—UID/Multi/04326/2013, ToxOmics—UID/BIM/00009/2013, PTDC/MAR-BIO/4132/2014; CAPES Fundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, through the scholarship 99999.009153/2013-06; VFAN (306993/2015-5) is a CNPq/PQ-Research Productivity Fellowship recipient. We thank MR4 for providing us with malaria parasites contributed by Didier Menard, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12936_2018_2281_MOESM1_ESM.docx (516 kb)
Additional file 1. Synthetic procedures and experimental details for the preparation and chemical characterization of compounds.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. World Malaria report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dondorp AM, Fairhurst RM, Slutsker L, Macarthur JR, Breman JG, Guerin PJ, et al. The threat of artemisinin-resistant malaria. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1073–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noedl H, Se Y, Sriwichai S, Schaecher K, Teja-Isavadharm P, Smith B, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Cambodia: a clinical trial designed to address an emerging problem in Southeast Asia. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:e82–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lubell Y, Dondorp A, Guérin PJ, Drake T, Meek S, Ashley E, et al. Artemisinin resistance—modelling the potential human and economic costs. Malar J. 2014;13:452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tun KM, Imwong M, Lwin KM, Win AA, Hlaing TM, Hlaing T, et al. Spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Myanmar: a cross-sectional survey of the K13 molecular marker. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:415–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Mao S, Sopha C, et al. Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a multisite prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:357–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spring MD, Lin JT, Manning JE, Vanachayangkul P, Somethy S, Bun R, et al. Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine failure associated with a triple mutant including kelch13 C580Y in Cambodia: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:683–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois A-C, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wells TNC, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Van Voorhis WC. Malaria medicines: a glass half full? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:424–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vennerstrom JL, Arbe-Barnes S, Brun R, Charman SA, Chiu FCK, Chollet J, et al. Identification of an antimalarial synthetic trioxolane drug development candidate. Nature. 2004;430:900–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fontaine SD, Spangler B, Gut J, Lauterwasser EMW, Rosenthal PJ, Renslo AR. Drug delivery to the malaria parasite using an arterolane-like scaffold. ChemMedChem. 2015;10:47–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:411–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang T, Xie SC, Cao P, Giannangelo C, McCaw J, Creek DJ, et al. Comparison of the exposure time dependence of the activities of synthetic ozonide antimalarials and dihydroartemisinin against K13 wild-type and mutant Plasmodium falciparum strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4501–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siriwardana A, Iyengar K, Roepe PD. Endoperoxide drug cross-resistance patterns for Plasmodium falciparum exhibiting an artemisinin delayed-clearance phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:6952–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Stokes BH, Ehrenberger M, Crane AA, Fidock DA. Plasmodium falciparum K13 mutations differentially impact ozonide susceptibility and parasite fitness in vitro. MBio. 2017;8:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lobo L, de Sousa B, Cabral L, Cristiano MLS, Nogueira F. Highly active ozonides selected against drug resistant malaria. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111(7):450–3.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fügi MA, Wittlin S, Dong Y, Vennerstrom JL. Probing the antimalarial mechanism of artemisinin and OZ277 (arterolane) with nonperoxidic isosteres and nitroxyl radicals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1042–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santos SA, Lukens AK, Coelho L, Nogueira F, Wirth DF, Mazitschek R, et al. Exploring the 3-piperidin-4-yl-1H-indole scaffold as a novel antimalarial chemotype. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;102:320–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.07.047 (Epub 2015 Jul 31).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nogueira F, Diez A, Radfar A, Pérez-Benavente S, do Rosario VE, Puyet A, et al. Early transcriptional response to chloroquine of the Plasmodium falciparum antioxidant defence in sensitive and resistant clones. Acta Trop. 2010;114:109–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Machado M, Murtinheira F, Lobo ENF. Whole-Cell SYBR Green I assay for antimalarial activity assessment. Ann Clin Med Microbiol. 2016;2:1010.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Khim N, Sreng S, Chim P, Kim S, et al. Novel phenotypic assays for the detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: in vitro and ex vivo drug-response studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:1043–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peters W. Drug resistance in Plasmodium berghei Vincke and Lips, 1948. 3. Multiple drug resistance. Exp Parasitol. 1965;17:97–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carvalho LH, Brandão MG, Santos-Filho D, Lopes JL, Krettli AU. Antimalarial activity of crude extracts from Brazilian plants studied in vivo in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice and in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum in culture. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 1991;24:1113–23.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baptista FG, Pamplona A, Pena AC, Mota MM, Pied S, Vigario AM. Accumulation of Plasmodium berghei-infected red blood cells in the brain is crucial for the development of cerebral malaria in mice. Infect Immun. 2010;78:4033–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mota M, Lobo L, da Costa JG, Costa L, Rocha e Silva H, Rocha L, et al. In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activity of essential oils and chemical components from three medicinal plants found in northeastern Brazil. Planta Med. 2012;78:658–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Sena Pereira VS, Silva de Oliveira CB, Fumagalli F, Emery F, da Silva NB, de Andrade-Neto VF. Cytotoxicity, hemolysis and in vivo acute toxicity of 2-hydroxy-3-anilino-1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives. Toxicol Reports. 2016;3:756–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ismael A, Borba A, Henriques MSC, Paixão JA, Fausto R, Cristiano MLS. Structure and photochemistry of a saccharyl thiotetrazole. J Org Chem. 2015;80:392–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang Y, Dong Y, Vennerstrom JL. Synthetic peroxides as antimalarials. Med Res Rev. 2004;24:425–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jourdan J, Matile H, Reift E, Biehlmaier O, Dong Y, Wang X, et al. Monoclonal antibodies that recognize the alkylation signature of antimalarial ozonides OZ277 (arterolane) and OZ439 (artefenomel). ACS Infect Dis. 2016;2:54–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ismail HM, Barton V, Phanchana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Wong MHL, Hemingway J, et al. Artemisinin activity-based probes identify multiple molecular targets within the asexual stage of the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum 3D7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:2080–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Stokes BH, Ehrenberger M, Crane AA, Fidock DA. Plasmodium falciparum K13 mutations differentially impact ozonide susceptibility and parasite fitness in vitro. MBio. 2017;8:e00172–217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weniger B, Robledo S, Arango GJ, Deharo E, Aragón R, Muñoz V, et al. Antiprotozoal activities of Colombian plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;78:193–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Soh PN, Benoit-Vical F. Are West African plants a source of future antimalarial drugs? J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;114:130–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nwaka S, Hudson A. Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:941–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Drąg-Zalesińska M, Wysocka T, Borska S, Drąg M, Poręba M, Choromańska A, et al. The new esters derivatives of betulin and betulinic acid in epidermoid squamous carcinoma treatment—in vitro studies. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;72:91–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Herr RJ. 5-Substituted-1H-tetrazoles as carboxylic acid isosteres: medicinal chemistry and synthetic methods. Bioorg Med Chem. 2002;10:3379–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fan X, Zhang X, Bories C, Loiseau PM, Torrence PF. The Ugi reaction in the generation of new nucleosides as potential antiviral and antileishmanial agents. Bioorg Chem. 2007;35:121–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Upadhayaya RS, Jain S, Sinha N, Kishore N, Chandra R, Arora SK. Synthesis of novel substituted tetrazoles having antifungal activity. Eur J Med Chem. 2004;39:579–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Adamec J, Waisser K, Kunes J, Kaustová J. A note on the antitubercular activities of 1-aryl-5-benzylsulfanyltetrazoles. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2005;338:385–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schaffert ES, Höfner G, Wanner KT. Aminomethyltetrazoles as potential inhibitors of the γ-aminobutyric acid transporters mGAT1-mGAT4: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:6492–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mohite PB, Bhaskar VH. In vitro evaluation of tetrazoles as a novel class of Antimycobacterium tuberculosis agents. Adv Pharm Bull. 2012;2:31–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh H, Chawla AS, Kapoor VK, Paul D, Malhotra RK. Medicinal chemistry of tetrazoles. Prog Med Chem. 1980;17:151–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Arulmurugan S, Kavitha HP. Synthesis and potential cytotoxic activity of some new benzoxazoles, imidazoles, benzimidazoles and tetrazoles. Acta Pharm. 2013;63:253–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chauhan K, Sharma M, Trivedi P, Chaturvedi V, Chauhan PMS. New class of methyl tetrazole based hybrid of (Z)-5-benzylidene-2-(piperazin-1-yl)thiazol-4(%H)-one as potent antitubercular agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:4166–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tukulula M, Njoroge M, Mugumbate GC, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ, Barteau S, et al. Tetrazole-based deoxyamodiaquines: synthesis, ADME/PK profiling and pharmacological evaluation as potential antimalarial agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:4904–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chauhan K, Sharma M, Trivedi P, Chaturvedi V, Chauhan PMS. New class of methyl tetrazole based hybrid of (Z)-5-benzylidene-2-(piperazin-1-yl)thiazol-4(%H)-one as potent antitubercular agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:4166–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Araújo NCP, Barroca PMM, Bickley JF, Brigas AF, Cristiano MLS, Johnstone RAW, et al. Structural effects on sigmatropic shifts in heteroaromatic allyl ethers Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: selected crystal data for compound 7. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 2002;1:1213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gómez-Zavaglia A, Reva ID, Frija L, Cristiano ML, Fausto R. Molecular structure, vibrational spectra and photochemistry of 2-methyl-2H-tetrazol-5-amine in solid argon. J Phys Chem A. 2005;109:7967–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li Z, Qian L, Li L, Bernhammer JC, Huynh HV, Lee JS, et al. Tetrazole photoclick chemistry: reinvestigating its suitability as a bioorthogonal reaction and potential applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55:2002–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ismael A, Fausto R, Cristiano MLS. Photochemistry of 1- and 2-methyl-5-aminotetrazoles: structural effects on reaction pathways. J Org Chem. 2016;81:11656–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fernández I, Robert A. Peroxide bond strength of antimalarial drugs containing an endoperoxide cycle. Relation with biological activity. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:4098–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang Z, Wang Y, Cabrera M, Zhang Y, Gupta B, Wu Y, et al. Artemisinin resistance at the China-Myanmar border and association with mutations in the K13 propeller gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6952–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:455–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chotivanich K, Tripura R, Das D, Yi P, Day NPJ, Pukrittayakamee S, et al. Laboratory detection of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3157–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in Western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Amaratunga C, Sreng S, Suon S, Phelps ES, Stepniewska K, Lim P, et al. Artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Pursat province, western Cambodia: a parasite clearance rate study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:851–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Duru V, Ramadani AP, et al. Drug resistance. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science. 2015;347:428–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kite WA, Melendez-Muniz VA, Moraes Barros RR, Wellems TE, Sá JM. Alternative methods for the Plasmodium falciparum artemisinin ring-stage survival assay with increased simplicity and parasite stage-specificity. Malar J. 2016;15:94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thuy-Nhien N, Tuyen NK, Tong NT, Vy NT, Thanh NV, Van HT, et al. K13 propeller mutations in Plasmodium falciparum populations in regions of malaria endemicity in Vietnam from 2009–2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01578–616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chaorattanakawee S, Lon C, Jongsakul K, Gawee J, Sok S, Sundrakes S, et al. Ex vivo piperaquine resistance developed rapidly in Plasmodium falciparum isolates in northern Cambodia compared to Thailand. Malar J. 2016;15:519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    O’Neill PM, Amewu RK, Charman SA, Sabbani S, Gnädig NF, Straimer J, et al. A tetraoxane-based antimalarial drug candidate that overcomes PfK13-C580Y dependent artemisinin resistance. Nat Commun. 2017;8:151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ménard D, Khim N, Beghain J, Adegnika AA, Shafiul-Alam M, Amodu O, et al. A Worldwide map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller polymorphisms. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2453–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Takala-Harrison S, Clark TG, Jacob CG, Cummings MP, Miotto O, Dondorp AM, et al. Genetic loci associated with delayed clearance of Plasmodium falciparum following artemisinin treatment in Southeast Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:240–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Takala-Harrison S, Jacob CG, Arze C, Cummings MP, Silva JC, Dondorp AM, et al. Independent emergence of artemisinin resistance mutations among Plasmodium falciparum in Southeast Asia. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:670–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Straimer J, Gnadig NF, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Duru V, Ramadani AP, et al. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science. 2015;347:428–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Witkowski B, Khim N, Chim P, Kim S, Ke S, Kloeung N, et al. Reduced artemisinin susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum ring stages in western Cambodia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:914–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Teuscher F, Chen N, Kyle DE, Gatton ML, Cheng Q. Phenotypic changes in artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum lines in vitro: evidence for decreased sensitivity to dormancy and growth inhibition. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:428–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Paulo A, Figueiras M, Machado M, Charneira C, Lavrado J, Santos SA, et al. Bis-alkylamine Indolo[3,2-b]quinolines as hemozoin ligands: implications for antimalarial cytostatic and cytocidal activities. J Med Chem. 2014;57:3295–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Unidade de Ensino e Investigação de Parasitologia MédicaInstituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNLLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMARUniversidade do Algarve, UAlgFaroPortugal
  3. 3.Departmento de Química e Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, FCTUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  4. 4.Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, Genetics, Oncology and Human ToxicologyNova Medical SchoolLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Laboratório de Biologia da Malária e Toxoplasmose, Departamento de Microbiologia e ParasitologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil

Personalised recommendations